Good day everyone and welcome to the Eagle Materials conference call for fiscal 2018. This call is being recorded. At this time, I would like to turn the call over to Eagle's President and CEO, Mr. Dave Powers. Mr. Powers, please go ahead, sir.

Thank you, Brian. Good morning and welcome to Eagle Materials conference call for our fiscal year and fourth fiscal quarter of 2018. We're glad that you could be with us today. Joining me today are Craig Kesler, our Chief Financial Officer, and Bob Stewart, Executive Vice President of Strategy, Corporate Development and Communications. There will be a slide presentation made in connection with this call. To access it, please go to eaglematerials.com and click on the link to the Webcast. While you're accessing the slides, please note that the first slide covers our cautionary disclosure regarding forward-looking statements made during this call. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties and could cause results to differ from those discussed during the call. For further information, please refer to this disclosure, which is also included at the end of our press release. Let me begin by saying this has been a good year for Eagle Materials as we reported earnings per share of up 29% on record revenues and extended our track record of the industry-leading margin performance. Our fourth quarter was adversely affected by weather, which has been widely chronicled, and we had a few one-time items as well, but in my view it was a respectable quarter all in all. The fundamentals of our business are strong and getting stronger. Our sales volumes in April compared to a year ago encourage us and we are out of the gates and off to a fast start. We strongly believe the best is yet to come. Cement is largely a regional business in the U.S. We have some of our regions that have become very tight, while others have been sequentially later in the recovery. We are seeing some things in the market that tell us we are approaching a point…

Thank you, Dave. Eagle's fiscal year 2018 revenue was a record $1.4 million, an increase of 14% from the prior year, reflecting improved sales volumes and prices across most of our businesses. Eagle's annual earnings per share improved 29% to a record $5.28. As we mentioned in the press release, Eagle's fourth quarter financial results include a $6 million pre-tax charge related to the settlement of an antitrust lawsuit brought by a group of homebuilders against American Gypsum. We continue to deny all wrongdoing but we made a business decision to avoid the further expense, distraction and litigation risk. Our fourth quarter results also include $4 million of personnel related expenses, including an increased contribution made to the Eagle profit sharing plan and a pension settlement charge. We have nearly fully funded our pension liabilities and the charge reflects the results of lumpsum payments taken by inactive employees which reduced the pension participants by approximately 15%. This next slide highlights the results of our Heavy Materials sector, which includes our Cement, Concrete and Aggregates segments. A 10% improvement in Cement sales volume and improved pricing were the primary drivers of the 12% increase in Eagle's annual comparative of Heavy Materials revenue. Operating earnings from our Heavy Materials business improved 15% to a record $197 million, reflecting the addition of the Fairborn business and improved pricing. Moving to the Light Materials sector, which includes our Wallboard and Paperboard segments, improved sales volumes and net sales prices drove a 4% improvement in our annual comparative of Light Materials revenue. Annual operating earnings in our Light Materials business declined 3% to $191 million, reflecting higher OCC costs, offset slightly by higher net sales prices. It is worth noting, OCC costs have dramatically abated through the second half of the year and have remained…

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Brent Thielman from D.A. Davidson. Your line is now open.

Dave, on the cement side, I was hoping that you could elaborate a little more on your comments, or at least what you're seeing in terms of some of the tension developing in the heartland, and are you seeing any more momentum in some of the public sector work that's been kind of late to form, some things that maybe they be a little more optimistic about the volumes on that side of the business?

We are seeing an increase in public sector work. Our backlog of bids has been substantially increased versus prior year at this time and it's really affecting our volume. When I look at our April shipments on a per day basis versus last April on a per day basis, we are up well over 10%.

Okay. And is that the same for the JV as well? I know volumes have been under pressure there for a few quarters now.

Our plant is sold out at this time and we are importing a little bit of product up to our max. So, our volumes are – we are tight in Texas, we are real tight.

Okay. And then maybe on the freight side for wallboard, I think last call you talked about kind of around a $2 headwind to mill net. Is that roughly what played out this quarter and is that kind of still the expectation going forward?

Actually, Brent, freight is going to be a little higher for us. We are in the middle of negotiating with carriers. We're probably 70% done. And right now we are anticipating about a 10% to 12% increase in our outbound freight numbers as we look at it today.

Okay. And then last one if I could, just Craig, do you have the average price for that 350,000 shares you acquired in the quarter?

$102 a share.

Okay, great. Thank you. I'll turn it over.

Our next question comes from the line of Scott Schrier from Citi. Your line is now open.

I wanted to first ask about the wallboard. Obviously, the 8% sequential pricing is very strong. Volumes came in, and I understand the timing of the pre-buy, but just looking at the national data, volumes came in a little light. So, I just want to see how you are thinking about the balance between price versus volume and how to think about that going forward.

No, we always try and maximize the volume-price relationship to generate the most gross profit dollars. And the way we looked at it, let's lean on price in the first quarter, because we felt very strongly the volume was going to come to us, and it has.

Got it. And in that pricing number, was there any role that geographic mix might have played in the quarter due to all the weather that we have seen?

No, we didn't see any at all.

Got it. And then, following up on the last question on the cost inflation, but just thinking about it more on the cement side, can you help us think about are there any buckets that we should be considering that you're going to see some increases in cement price or cement costs?

Scott, the cement business is predominantly energy focused, between fuel and electricity, and we weren't seeing any significant movements there or any unusual movements. There is always some inflationary pressures. Really the point that Dave made on the wallboard outbound freight, it does impact some of the inbound raw materials if you are railing or trucking those materials into your facilities. So, it will be more on the freight side than the underlying commodities.

And on the rail side, I know you called out some rail congestion and logistics issues in frac sand. Did we see any of that in cement and should we expect to see any of that in cement?

Scott, I'll just tell you, we are seeing very tight shipping utilization across the country and almost across all the products. And whether you're talking about wallboard, cement, or frac sand, the rails are extremely congested, which is causing delays for turns of railcars, which is really causing each individual region to become very tight, and Dave mentioned it, around the cement. It's just getting harder to ship things further and that's just raising utilization rates, and you are trying to ship as much as you can underneath the umbrella of your facility. So, I won't just speak to that on one business line. That's what we are doing across all the business lines at this point, making those decisions to meet customer needs to the best of our abilities.

In addition to rail, truck is also very tight, and that's why you are seeing the rates come up, and we struggle to get carriers to put a truck under our load from time to time.

Got it, great. That's helpful. Thank you, gentlemen.

Our next question comes from the line of Jerry Revich from Goldman Sachs. Your line is now open.

I'm wondering if you folks can talk about the cadence of cement pricing actions this year, how that compares to last year. So, your sequential price increase in cement was lighter this quarter than the March quarter over the past couple of years. So, is it the timing of increases, is it mix, can you just help us get a feel for how pricing actions are stacking up this year versus last year?

We did announce price increases this year very similar to last year, and it's a little too early to measure that, but we were partially successful on these increases. We did have a couple of competitive situations that we chose to meet in February. We did have several jobs that as you know didn't ship in the December-ending quarter because of weather and hurricanes and other things. We honored those prices and we are now shipping those jobs. So, those two things did affect our mill net a little bit.

And Dave, how does that cadence play out over the next couple of quarters? Are those jobs done? So, as those jobs finish shipping and hopefully the competitive environment becomes less competitive over the course of the construction season, are you expecting sequential cement price increases from a realized standpoint as we go through the year because of those two factors?

We expect, as those jobs roll off, and they will roll off mid-summer, to get a little bit of margin improvement, yes.

Okay, thank you. And then in terms of the cement year-over-year operating profit performance, obviously a seasonally weak quarter overall on top of the weather issues, but I'm wondering if you could just step us through what were the biggest headwinds beyond volumes that offset the contribution of the new cement asset in driving the year-over-year EBIT decline, is it maintenance timing, can you just maybe give us the broad strokes, Craig?

Sure. I'll point to the volume and the impact that weather had on the volume. On the cost side, our performance was pretty good and we did have a 6% or 7% improvement in net cement sales prices. But when you have a January and February, and for many of our markets even in the March here, you are talking about in places like Missouri average rainfall of more than 700% from where we were the prior year, Illinois same type of increase, Texas, parts of Texas set records in January and February for the amount of rain that fell, those are – when you are impacting sales volumes to that degree, your fixed cost absorption is going to be overcome by any price improvement. So, as volumes start to pick up here in the construction season, that will solve a lot of those issues.

And our next question comes from the line of Adam Thalhimer from Thompson Davis. Your line is now open.

The 10% volume growth you saw in April, that was in cement, correct?

Yes. So as Dave said, the production season has gotten off to a very good start here in April and volumes have been strong in cement, as well as even on the Light side, the business has started off the construction season on to foot.

I might add, in the Light side, the gypsum business, our growth April over April on a per-day shipping basis is up in the high single-digits.

Okay, perfect. That was the next question. And then I'm a little confused just on the cement pricing commentary, because we started the call and we said, conditions are very tight, maybe the tightest we have seen in years, but then in the Q&A we have talked about some weakness in some markets. Can you just give a little more color on how you are thinking about holding on cement price?

We do understand the supply/demand dynamics and the impact it can have on price. We continue to evaluate these dynamics. We have made no decisions at this point going forward, and if and when we do, our customers will be the first to know.

But just in general, I mean what – I guess that tightness you talked about in your opening comments, I mean just some high-level thoughts on what that could mean for pricing?

I understand your question. I think the point we're trying to make is, it's not an exact timing as far as when the prices will increase and how much of the recent increases have been realized. I think the communication is around tightness across the whole system, and over a period of time as utilization rates rise and again back to this freight cost going up and shipping radiuses shrinking, that should be supportive of this business for the next several years rather than trying to figure out which individual quarter or how much. We're looking at the next two to three years or more of a very good environment to be running this business.

Okay, perfect. Thanks guys.

Our next question comes from the line of Philip Ng from Jefferies. Your line is now open.

This is actually Colin on for Phil. Just going back to the cement side and pricing, I was just wondering, you guys talked about markets being tight in places like Texas. Is there a specific market, is there an opportunity for a second price increase ahead of where you're standing at your other markets?

I can tell you we are looking at that now but we have made no decisions. And there are several strong markets. Texas is one, Colorado is one, Nevada is another one. We continue to evaluate the supply/demand dynamics on a daily basis.

Okay. And then just in terms of the wallboard, some of your competitors have announced the second price increase. Just given where demand trends and raw material inflation are, can you give any color around the opportunity to realize a second price increase in that market?

Again, we continue to look at the supply/demand dynamics on a daily basis and we'll do what's right for American Gypsum and its customers. And when we do, our customers will be the first to know.

Okay, thank you very much.

Our next question comes from the line of Joshua Wilson from Raymond James. Your line is now open.

Thanks for fitting me in. A clarification question first, the $4 million in personnel expenses that you called out, is all of that one-time in nature or is some of that part of a new normal?

Most of that is non-recurring. Certainly the pension piece and the profit sharing was a one-time adjustment that we made this year. So, yes, most of it is non-recurring.

And then regarding freight, you talked about the outbound freight inflation for wallboard. Can you address that as it relates to your other segments?

Fortunately, most of the other businesses, for the vast majority of them, they are either customer pick-up or priced FOB the mine or FOB a basin. So, freight is not a comportment in those businesses, like it is in wallboard.

Got it. And then could you give us a sense of what the Fairborn volume or sales were in the quarter?

Yes. So, if you look at our sales volume, and we'll just talk about it on an annual basis, our total cement shipments were up 10%, they would have been almost virtually flat without Fairborn.

Thanks. Good luck with the next quarter.

Our next question comes from the line of Blake Hirschman from Stephens. Your line is now open.

My first one, I think I heard you mention that net cement prices were up 6% or 7%. I just wanted to get a little bit of clarity as to what exactly that number was referring to?

So that's in the press release. If you look at cement, prices per ton were up 6%.

Got it, on a per ton basis, okay. And then second, apologies if I missed it, but I was looking to see what the impact of OCC prices were on a year-over-year basis. I think last year in the first quarter it was about a $3.5 million headwind. So I was just curious to get an update there.

So, OCC prices are down almost 50% from where we were a year ago, and that certainly runs through the paper business but it also impacts the wallboard business, but the way we price is on a quarterly lag. So, you've seen a little bit of benefit in the wallboard business, but not all of it. But as you could see a pretty dramatic improvement in the profitability of the paper mill, we are going from the $6.7 million of earnings to a little over $10 million with a big significant piece of that being the drop in OCC prices.

Got it. And then last one for me, it's a smaller piece of the business for you guys, but I saw that concrete pricing was down year-over-year I believe. Just curious if that might have been due to mix or kind of what was driving that. Thanks.

Just regional mix there. We have got three small divisions spread across in the country and no real mix there.

And that concludes our Q&A session. I will like to turn the call back to Mr. Dave Powers for any closing remarks.

I do want to thank you all for your anticipation and we look forward to seeing you later this summer.