Good morning, and welcome to the F.N.B. Corporation Second Quarter 2024 Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions] After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. [Operator Instructions] Please note this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Lisa Hajdu, Manager of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Welcome to our earnings call. This conference call of FNB Corporation and the reports that filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission also contain forward-looking statements and non-GAAP financial measures. Non-GAAP financial measures should be viewed in addition to and not as an alternative for our reported results prepared in accordance with GAAP. Reconciliations of GAAP to non-GAAP operating measures to the most directly comparable financial measures are included in our presentation materials and in our earnings release. Please refer to these non-GAAP and forward-looking statement disclosures contained in our related materials, reports and registration statements filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and available on our corporate website. A replay of this call will be available until Thursday, July 25, and the webcast link will be posted to the About Us, Investor Relations section of our corporate website. I will now turn the call over to Vince Delie, Chairman, President and CEO.

Thank you, and welcome to our second quarter earnings call. Joining me today are Vince Calabrese, our Chief Financial Officer; and Gary Guerrieri, our Chief Credit Officer. FNB reported solid second quarter results with net income available to common shareholders of $123 million or $0.34 per diluted common share. Pre-provision net revenue increased over 4% linked-quarter supported by our well managed expenses and continued strong non-interest income levels. Tangible book value per share grew 12% year-over-year to reach a record high at $9.88. The second quarter's performance was driven by our long-term strategic goals to gain market share through loan and deposit growth, diversify revenue streams and manage risk. As we have previously mentioned, FNB is well-positioned to steadily increase market share in this volatile environment given the strength of our capital and liquidity position and adherence to our consistent and conservative underwriting guidance. FNB reported linked-quarter loan and deposit growth of 3.6% and 1% respectively, demonstrating our ability to execute on this strategy. Both of these results exceeded the published H8 data this quarter for both large and small institutions. The loan and deposit growth benefited from our investments in our digital eStore with total interactions increasing 22% year-over-year. The increase in commercial loans was driven by activity across the footprint highlighted by double-digit year-over-year growth across the Carolinas. Our Pittsburgh and Cleveland regions and commercial equipment finance business also posted strong contributions. The increase in FNB's commercial real estate portfolio included fundings on previously originated projects. On a spot basis, consumer loans grew 5% linked-quarter led by growth in residential mortgages. While growth in this portfolio is seasonally higher in the second quarter, our results also reflect the continued successful execution in key markets by our expanded mortgage banker team and longstanding strategy of serving the purchase market.…

Thank you, Vince, and good morning, everyone. We ended the quarter with our asset quality metrics remaining at solid levels. Petty of the link would see finished the quarter at 63 basis points down one bit from the prior quarter. NPLs and OREO remain unchanged, ending at 33 basis points, a multi-year low, with net charge-offs at 9 basis points, reflecting solid performance in the current economic environment. Total provision expense for the quarter stood at $20.2 million, with $12.8 million utilized to support loan growth and the remainder providing for charge-offs. Our ended funding reserve stands at $419 million, up $12.5 million in the quarter, ending at 1.24%. When including acquired unamortized loan discounts, our reserve stands at 1.35%, and our NPL coverage position remains strong at 421%, inclusive of the discounts. We continue to successfully execute on our strategy to monitor the non-owner CRE portfolio. Monthly, we analyze and segment upcoming and previously resolved maturities, largest exposures and market conditions for the various property types across our footprint. At quarter end, delinquency and NPLs for the non-owner occupied CRE portfolio improved slightly and continued to remain very low at 16 and 12 basis points, respectively. Net charge-offs reflected solid performance for the quarter at 4 basis points again confirming our consistent underwriting and strong sponsorship. The non-owner occupied office portfolio delinquency totaled 4 basis points with no NPLs largely in line with the prior quarter. We maintained strong focus on credit risk management and our portfolio continues to perform well throughout numerous economic cycles. Quarterly, we performed specific in-depth reviews of our portfolios along with a full portfolio stress test. Our stress testing results for this quarter have again shown lower net charge-offs and stable provision compared to the prior quarter's results with our current ACL covering approximately 90% of our projected charge-offs in a severe economic downturn. Again confirming that our well balanced loan portfolio enables us to withstand various stressed economic scenarios. In closing, our asset quality metrics ended the quarter at good levels and our loan portfolio continues to remain stable. Our continuous investments in credit risk management systems and corresponding staff complements our consistent underwriting and core credit philosophy. Our experienced banking teams and tenured leadership have positioned the company well to continue to achieve prudent loan growth while proactively managing credit risk through many economic cycles. I'll now turn the call over to Vince Calabrese, our Chief Financial Officer for his remarks.

Thanks, Gary and good morning. Today, I will focus on the second quarter's financial results and walk through our Q3 and full year guidance. As Vince mentioned, total loans and leases ended the quarter $33.8 billion, a linked-quarter increase of $1.2 billion or 3. 6%. This growth included $633 million in consumer loans driven by the seasonal peak of residential mortgage originations and $540 million in commercial loans and leases reflecting healthy activity in C&I and equipment finance as well as additional growth from fundings on previously committed commercial real estate projects. Total deposits ended the quarter at $35 billion an increase of $259 million linked-quarter, including growth in security deposits of $202 million and non-interest bearing deposits of $80 million as the seasonal build and public funds deposits has begun. The loan to deposit ratio increased to 96% at June 30th, compared to 94% at March 31st. We expect this ratio to decline in the medium-term, both organically and with several initiatives our team has implemented. Starting on the loan side of the equation, the second quarter's robust loan growth was higher than forecasted due to the seasonality of our mortgage business and stronger commercial client acquisition across the footprint. We expect loan growth to return to historical levels for the remainder of the year as pipelines have declined somewhat given the strong production in the quarter and the typical pause in client activity leading up to the presidential election. Looking at deposits, we currently have several deposit gathering initiatives targeting both commercial and consumer balances, including a strong treasury management pipeline and a new 5 month CD consumer money market promotion. Given the short duration of these promotions, we should be able to quickly reprice them lower when rates fall. Over the past year, our deposit growth and…

Thank you, Vince. This year celebrates our 160th anniversary as a Nationally Chartered Bank obtained through the National Banking Act in 1864. Through the execution of our growth strategy, FNB has continued prosper and develop into a diversified $48 billion regional financial institution. This quarter's results continue to reflect those efforts with resilient balance sheet, strong capital generation, ample liquidity and linked-quarter growth in pre-provision net revenue. We consistently received national recognition that affirms our competitive advantage with prominent publications such as Forbes ranking FNB, one of America's best Banks and naming us to its Global 2,000 listed companies based on sales, profit, assets and market value. Our strategic emphasis on innovation is integral to our success and we continue to earn national attention for digital engagement and leadership. Most recently, FNB's eStore won Best Digital initiative at the 2024 Banking Tech Awards USA. These awards highlight outstanding achievements and success in the U.S. Banking and FinTech Industry. In addition to winning Best Digital initiative, FNB was honored among the nation's top 5 largest financial institutions as a finalist for best use of technology and consumer banking, best user or customer experience initiative and top innovation. We also continue to earn awards for our commitment to our employees who enable our success. During the second quarter, we extended the long list of top workplace honors we received nationally. In the financial services industry and throughout our footprint with specific awards for culture, excellence, and leadership. As we reflect on a solid quarter, I want to thank our team for their many contributions. We appreciate your dedication. By maintaining our focus on our shared principles and goals, we are poised to navigate the ever-changing macroeconomic landscape and deliver for our customers, communities and shareholders.

We will now begin the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions]. The first question comes from Daniel Tamayo from Raymond James.

Good morning, guys. Thank you for taking my questions. Maybe starting on the balance sheet side, you talked about a slowing of loan growth in the back half of the year relative to what's been -- or what was a pretty strong quarter in the second quarter. Obviously, you had a lot of residential mortgage growth. You had some commercial real estate growth and some commercial growth as well. Maybe you can talk about just the mix that you're expecting in the back half, if you expect that slowing to come from the residential side. Obviously, some seasonality in the second quarter here, but if that's part of it, if you're also seeing -- expecting a slowing on the commercial real estate side with construction fundings slowing, just curious on the mix you expect.

I don't do mortgage growth. [Indiscernible] I was going to turn it over to Vince Calabrese. I think a couple of things. First of all, the mortgage growth is seasonal. So, we've already started to see, as we move into the third quarter, we started to see lower locks in our pipeline. So, we expect that to come down fairly substantially. So, less being put on the balance sheet as we move forward there through the second half of the year. The construction fundings were on committed -- primarily committed obligations, we do quite a bit where we do the construction financing and it's taken out by some form down the road. So, those fund ups occur natural funding as we move through the construction period. So, that presented growth this quarter. And then we had some pretty robust growth in equipment finance. We've been doing pretty well there with leases pretty much across the footprint. And there were some renewable energy deals that closed, I think, in the last quarter of last year. And the balance is there. I think we've exceeded $1 billion in balances in that book of business. So, it's grown immensely over time and continues to grow. C&I has contributed there were some significant growth in the Carolinas, Pittsburgh, Cleveland contributed. So, it was really coming from a bunch of areas fairly robust. In certain areas it appears we've been taking share from others. So I think the disruption that occurred really kind of mix it up with the customer base and gave us an opportunity to get out and pitch new transactions, which I think is very positive. The growth was higher than I expected, but I think it's okay because it positions us well moving into '25 given how we're shifting to a more liability sensitive balance sheet and putting those assets on really sets us up for '25 from an earnings perspective that we can continue to generate deposits. So I think that on the loan side that's why we're guiding. Our guidance hasn't changed. We're expecting to produce the same level that we forecast at the beginning of the year, but it's a little lumpy. And I'll tell you pipelines are down. We booked quite a bit this quarter. So we're moving into the next quarter down about 10% of commercial pipelines. And it's still a little sluggish on the consumer side. So we haven't seen as much -- what we've seen more mortgage -- first mortgage volume, there was much less home equity HELOC volume. So they kind of offset each other. And we're not expecting that to come back this year. So that's how the book just performs. The only other category, I think, I didn't speak about was indirect auto. I don't know Gary what your thoughts are there, right?

Yes. But we had a solid growth quarter in Q2, which is again seasonal very similar to the mortgage. We're getting really high quality paper there with focus on profitability. So improving margins and playing at the high end of the FICO band is really working well for us. But again that's seasonal, we're going to pick our spots and manage that through those seasonal periods. So we expect that to come down as we move toward the latter half of the year as well.

And then from a funding perspective, if we're able to execute our plan, we have seen growth in our treasury management pipeline. So we're seeing some very large good opportunities where we're the principal bank that should bring in demand deposits as we move forward. I think the bright spot here while we had to fund that growth with borrowings temporarily, the upside for us in the long run is to replace that with lower cost funding. And I think we've proven what we can do that. So the upside into '25 is us replacing those borrowings with deposits. And if you look at the demand deposit base, it's been stable. We've been at 29% for several quarters. We had growth in demand deposits which you're not seeing across some pretty decent growth in certain categories we've priced up to bring the targets on. We have not been as aggressive as others throughout the cycle. We're starting to look at pockets for us to price up to bring in deposits which also leads low-cost deposits in the fourth-store strategies kind of in the whole book, attracting those demand deposits as well.

Our beta performance goes to that point too, right? It's up very gradually from last quarter 36.5% to 38%. So that again is thus protecting the overall profitability.

Yes. As you can imagine, it's a challenging time to navigate. We don't want to pull back. I think a lot of competitors have shrunk their balance sheet or pulled back. I think this is an opportunity for us to go after some share bring in households and do what we do well, which is convert them to primary clients. So I hope that helps.

Yes. No, that's terrific. I really appreciate all that color. Maybe a quick follow-up. Just you touched on it at the end there on the funding side, but you also mentioned in the prepared comments about deposit initiatives in the back half of the year to kind of right size the loan deposit ratio. So just curious if you go into a little more detail about what you were thinking and how that could impact kind of funding costs --

Sure. We've modified the incentive plans for the consumer bank. We have kind of a kicker for deposit growth. So you're shipping the loan growth is pretty miniscule in that segment. So we thought, hey, we'll incentive to go after the deposits. We have a number of calling initiatives across the company on larger treasury management opportunities. We've won a bunch of transactions that haven't funded yet, which are fairly sizable. It seems like clients are willing to talk to us, given our performance over this past cycle. So, we've proven that we're capable of handling those relationships without a cycle and without any issues. I think that the people are very focused on it. Our teams are focused on it. And as long as we manage them in that direction and focus mainly on funding, that's going to pay off. And the other thing is the eStore, the investment in digital and additional technology, the interactions are up 22%. We're starting to get some traction there on the consumer side. And then I don't want to get into excruciating detail, but there are things that we do from an incentive compensation perspective, kind of across the board to send deposit growth. And then we've done some things on the mortgage side where we've used data analytics to cross-sell customers that we bring in, particularly in the physician's grow up and the jumbo mortgage segment. And we're partnering with wealth to do some things. And brokerage, we're working on a money market product that we'll work in and hand with our brokerage sales, which should help. So there's a bunch of things going on. And I think that it's going to take a little bit of time to get some lift out of it. But certainly, as we move into the second half of this year and into '25, we should see the benefits and everything from a funding perspective.

The next question comes from Frank Schiraldi with Piper Sandler.

Good morning, guys. Another strong fee income quarter and guide for continued strengths. Just curious, a bigger picture if you could share, your thoughts as you continue to grow out these businesses where you think you can grow the fee income side of the picture of two as a percentage of the total revenue pie. And maybe do you see any fee businesses in particular that you want to ramp up or you need to ramp up to get there?

Yes. We -- I think long term, this is long term. We've talked about this in the past. We just put information in our deck. We targeted at 30% of total revenue. We almost got there. But then the world changed in terms of net interest income. So it diluted that effort. But I think that's really the long term target. We want to continue to build out those fee-based businesses and make sure that it starts to consume more of the total revenue. That 30% target is kind of our target. Again, it's not something we're going to get to immediately, but we strive to get there. I think we've had great success in capital markets. We've done well building out our derivatives platform, our syndications platform. We have debt capital markets group that we've formed. It's a bond record for debt offerings. We I think there's opportunity for us to do things from an advisory perspective. I think there's opportunity for us to continue to focus on building out public finance. There are things that I think in the future businesses that are bolt-on businesses that will contribute and help continue to diversify that the income base. Given our size and our -- the span of the company, the markets that we compete in, I think we have a terrific opportunity to capitalize on those segments. And I think once we move into our building, we build a trading floor so we could bring all those capital markets groups together. It's fairly impressive. I think bringing clients in and showing them that we have these capabilities will lead to additional opportunities for us. And then on the wealth side, we have opportunities there. I think we've only scratched the surface in terms of building out our teams in…

In fact, I would just comment that the percent of revenue is a function of the industry environment. So, growing that absolute level given all the initiatives Vince talked about has been to keep focus and that just keeps building.

And then just maybe a quick follow-up just with some slower long growth relatively speaking to the second quarter, some slow growth in the back half of the year. And with you guys already above your target capital levels, just wondering and I know you bought back a little bit in the second quarter, but would you expect buyback activity to maybe ramp up here? Or are you more price sensitive? Obviously, we've seen a reasonable alley in bank stocks. So just wondering how we should think about buyback activity maybe as you see it today.

Yeah, I would say the level of activity we had in the second quarter, we really just to kind of buyback some of the incentive shares that were issued earlier in the year. So $250,000 that we bought. As we sit here today the focus on capital kind of building from here. At this point, we don't have any plans to repurchase shares looking at the second half of the year. I mean, I can change the environment changes, but right now, using the capital to support the loan growth, I think the fact that you were able to support the robust loan growth that we had this quarter at capital ratio CET1 hold at 10.2% and TCE ratio [indiscernible]. So holding those levels of capital and supporting the loan growth, I think is kind of the best use of the capital at this point. And the buyback will be part of our operation every year as we go forward. But as we sit here today, I think the best use is still letting that gradually build a little bit --

The next question comes from Casey Haire with Jefferies.

Great. Thanks. Good morning, everyone. A couple of follow-up questions on the funding strategy. So just wondering, what does the guide assume in terms of the borrowings that I'm assuming that stays there or is there an opportunity with these deposit initiatives to pay some of that down?

Yes. I would say that the guide basically has the increased liability position that we're entering the third quarter that's baked into that. So the better we do on the initiatives that are described, there's obviously opportunity, additional loan growth, as well as replace some of those short-term borrowings. And I should comment too, the short-term borrowings are that short-term. So when the Fed does cut, the rate on those is going to come down in tandem with the rate coming down. So we made a decision during the quarter, given the loan growth to kind of forego a little bit of earnings in the short run in the second quarter, but position us so that we can benefit from the down rates as we go forward.

No, I understood. Okay. And it sounds like these deposit initiatives are -- it doesn't sound like they're CDs. So just wondering to the extent that they're successful, what is the new money rate on these deposits that you hope to bring in versus the 5% borrowing yield?

Yes. I mean, it'll be a mix, Casey. I mean, we still have some level of CDs coming in. I mean, it's definitely slow. So the kind of remixing of what it was last year -- we looked at the second quarter, literally, we -- these CDs, $36 million on average a month. So where we had a high of $164 million last July. So the shifting there is definitely slow, but there's still -- customers are still grabbing those rates, right?

Yes. Our people aren't incentive to originally CD.

Right. That's a key point. And I think the operating account initiatives have been talking about calling on companies, new customers to come in, bringing in their operating accounts, non-interest bearing is obviously the key focus. So it's hard to predict any certainty of the mix, but it'll be a little bit of both. And the CD that's their customers want to drive or rates start to come down. So you have some attractive off ones there. I think that the importance as we move forward is just growing the total deposits.

Okay. And then just last one for me. Slide 16, the balance sheet repricing. Thanks for sharing that. So the new money bond yield on the roll-off rate of 250, just curious what yield you're getting on reinvestment. And then that swap with an 87 bps average received rate -- is that $1 billion, does that mature? Is that ratable throughout '25? Just looking for the maturity date on that?

Yes. A couple of comments on that. I think we added this content just to give everybody a little more understanding kind of what's on the need. So if we kind of roll through the pieces. Now the cash flow the $50 million annual cash flow coming off of $250 million. I mean today, we're investing $4.5 billion to $4.75 billion. During the second quarter, our guys did a great job opportunistically investing earlier in the quarter, kind of south -- I mean, north of 5%.

So we're speaking to Page 16 in the deck. It's still over nine months. Absolutely.

No, not a good point because I do want to talk through that. And then these other pieces here give us some flexibility as we move forward. I mean, $6.9 billion of time deposits, weighted average maturity in 9 months. And the CD promotions we've had over the last year 7 months, 13 months, today, our best rate is on a 5 month. So the idea is that when the Fed does start to move, we have the ability to maturing and we can kind of reprice those. So that's an important point. We have another $4 billion in non-maturity deposits with rates above $4.75 billion. Those are very repriceable. Again, once the Fed moves and basically if the Fed is expected to continue to move after that first move. So that gives us some flexibility the $4.5 billion of short-term or floating rate borrowings, again, those will just reprice down. So that's another lever for us. And then the $1 billion of swaps at the bottom there, Casey, is really -- they're going to mature $250 million a quarter next year. The 87 basis points is what we're receiving today. I mean that's a negative carry today of $10 million to $11 million a quarter. And that's going to start to go away in January.

The next question comes from Russell Gunther with Stephens.

Maybe just a follow-up on the discussion we were just having. Given your move towards neutral and some of the balance sheet repricing we just discussed, is an initial Fed cut still a negative to the NIM as deposit costs lag or can some of that fixed repricing dynamic overcome a headwind from an initial step down?

Yes. I think it depends on kind of what the expectation is for cut kind of after that first cut, as Vince kind of talked about. If that down rates are expected to continue. That gives us a lot more cover to be aggressive on the deposit pricing side. I'd say if it's one and done, like -- we kind of have in our guidance. There probably is some short-term timing issues where it probably is a near-term negative and then there's some timing constraints with how fast we can reprice deposits. But if there is several more cuts baked into the curve, and that's kind of expected on the client side that gives us a lot more cover to act more aggressively and hopefully, we can capture some of that downside beta a little bit quicker than we think here.

And then just could you guys talk about deposit pricing competition in your markets just broadly. Getting some, I don't know, mixed messages early in earnings season, particularly out of the Southeast. There are some peers are talking about accelerated competition, others talking about successfully walking down promo rates. Just your overall thought would be helpful in terms of where you think deposit costs are ahead of the next couple of quarters.

I think that many of our competitors have kind of shifted once they connect and priced up deposits to basically -- they have backed off. So I think a lot of the larger competitors have backed off a little bit. So if you look at the promotional pricing that's out there, you're going to see 25 to 50 basis point reduction versus what was running in the heat of I call it the micro liquidity crisis. But I think that's why you're getting mixed signals. I think it's different at each institution. And then all of a sudden, you'll see somebody emerge and they'll have a really aggressive rate. So I think they've moved -- people generally move -- companies that generally move in to a strategy that we had where they were selective repricing our products and maybe doing a more quiet promotional pricing versus what's on their website. So you're going to hear a mix bag. I mean, it's going to be all of -- so I would say it's less competitive than it was other than spots. There's still some irrational pricing out there. So depending on who's calling on your client you need to react to that, right? So that's where I think we are. But I do -- just in the surveys that we do, we do a lot of work on monitoring whose pricing what we've seen a pullback in the stated pricing, the promotional pricing that's out there that we can see from many of our competitors. So it's come down. But then, like I said, every once in a while somebody emerges with a really aggressive brand. But if the term has come in. A lot of the competitors are doing what we are doing, they're shortening the duration of the time deposit portfolio by putting out a more aggressive CD that's priced shorter by months, 3 months, 6 months. We see it all over the place, the pricing has moved in anyway. That's what we're seeing.

I would just add there, too, it depends on if the bank is from in loans or not, right? So depending on who you're talking to the banks that aren't growing loans at all, they're just managing the rates down more because they're not trying to generate deposits with our growth and bringing in all those new customers it's a different environment that you want to deposits. So it really depends on the market and the bank.

As you read through the -- as I read through the earnings release is, I can see that. I can see we're -- our margin contracted because we were lending improve their margin, right? We've seen inflows of deposits and given the pricing is all over the board. So it's choppy. It's still competitive. And I think people are just retrenching the situation on an individual basis.

I would just add, too, to the margin compression as we said, it was down 9 basis points for the quarter. But if you look at the dollars of net interest income, right, which is most critical from a online profitability standpoint. We were down $3.1 million this quarter, $5 million decline last quarter or $6 million the quarter before. So kind of in line with that. So -- and then to go forward, as I mentioned earlier, more success we have with the deposit initiatives and then rates come down, we can replace always [indiscernible] 16 that I talked about that gives you a kind of positive momentum as you go forward.

Got it. Well, guys, I appreciate both your thoughts on the question. I guess the last one for me and understanding it sounds like we are poised to be flat to up on NII going forward, but a little incremental pressure overall to the guide. Would you guys consider another securities portfolio repositioning? Or how does that currently sit in your opportunity set?

Yes. I would just say that the net interest income, I mean, we expect the second quarter to be the trough in net interest income dollars. So we do expect it to move up the next couple of quarters just on all the things that we described. And then we evaluate the whole balance sheet on a regular basis. So as we said, with what we did in the fourth quarter, we were very thoughtful about the size of that and the nature of the overall optimization strategy we deployed. So we look at everything. So everything is kind of on the table from a recess standpoint. But I think we're focused primarily on the organic growth in the loans and then all the deposit initiatives really fund the loan growth.

It really helps us to bring those households on. I mean that helps us -- in the future helps us generate additional business. I think we've done a pretty good job of selling to that customer base.

The next question comes from Manuel Navas with D.A. Davidson.

If the Fed points to kind of a continued down rate cycle, could you have upside to the high end of your NII range? Or would it actually maybe exceed it? Just kind of some thoughts on that kind of variability that you kind of touched on briefly before.

Yes. Manuel, I think -- like I said, our guide has one cut in it right now and that's it for the year. If there were more kind of cuts baked into the curve. I think the upside really would show up at '25. I think that sets us up really well for what '25 could look like, especially if the curve uninverted after, I don't know how long it's been 2 years now of inversion. So I think that would be more of a '25 impact. I'm sure it would be helpful. But like I said, there's some mechanics on the timing of when CDs mature, some of that's locked in. So with 5 months CDs that are coming on now, a lot of the repricing happens at the end of the year. I think that really sets us up for 2025.

And our brand is pretty tight. As you know, if you look at the guide for that interest income. It's a pretty tight band there.

In the last 3 years, this third quarter has certainly been pretty good deposit growth quarter. I think you have some seasonality that you touched on in meeting flows. Can you just kind of touch on that kind of just organic better deposit trends this quarter potential?

Yes. Go ahead.

I was going to say, yes, the normal seasonal surge that we see in deposits, particularly on the municipal side, happens kind of now through October, November time frame, and that can be $600 million to $800 million kind of peak to trough and usually we got them in the first quarter and then [indiscernible]. So that seasonality we expect, and that will be supplemented by the initiative Vince talked about earlier as far as the commercial and consumer deposits.

Can you -- at least where your NIM kind of ended the quarter? Sometimes you show where it's progressed monthly basis?

Yes. The monthly -- I mean, the monthly margin there was some move in the last month of the quarter, it was within a basis point or 2 of the quarterly average.

The next question comes from Kelly Motta with KBW.

I think you've touched on it a bit, but clearly, loan growth was incredibly strong, and it's a great operating need to win new households and clients to the firm. Just wondering where you're seeing the greatest opportunity to take share, whether it's a certain region or segment of the business?

Yes. And we've seen some pretty decent growth coming out of the Carolinas. I think that continues to be an area with upside for us. I think that we've only started to scratch the surface in terms of our calling activity there. So there's quite a bit on the table. And as we moved into South Carolina, we've built out building out Greenville and South Charleston. There's a lot of opportunity there for us, both from a wealth private banking and commercial banking. So we continue to see good growth in those areas in Charlotte, we've had some good success. We've had success in the -- from a deposit perspective, we've had great success in Wilmington and [indiscernible]. So we're pretty optimistic about the Southeast. And then Pittsburgh continues to perform very well. We have a lot of upside there. We have significant share here in the Pittsburgh market. So I think in certain business lines were undersized. Mortgage, I don't think we're sized appropriately given the deposit share that we have here. So there's some opportunity there for us to continue to grow in the Pittsburgh market from the consumer lending perspective. And basically, from a C&I perspective, we're not penetrated in this market. So there's quite a bit to do. Cleveland was sluggish over the last few years, but I think there's upside in the Cleveland market for us in C&I. And then I mentioned equipment finance, I think, equipment finances has done very well and should continue to do well as we move through this period, get through the election because there's been kind of a hold up on some small ticket capital spending from the C&I base. We'll see that release as we move past November when there's more clarity on what's going to happen. I think those are the areas that I think have the most upside for us. And then on the flip side of that, there's less activity going on in CRE, obviously, right? Business it's happening.

And then understanding these things take time. Just wondering if we could get your updated thoughts on M&A, clearly, valuations across the board have improved and especially in light of potentially more accommodating regulatory environment potentially on the horizon. Just wondering, updated thoughts, any thoughts on potentially where would be looking to add density or fill in.

Yes, I think it's going to be the same answer we've given in the last few quarters. We're going to be opportunistic we are focused internally. We have a number of major initiatives going on right now and building out heightened standards capabilities were focusing on building out the digital platform. You remember when you came and met with us, we had quite a bit that we were tackling. That doesn't mean M&A is off the table. It's just that we've been focused internally to strengthen the platform, right, so that we can grow and expand and benefit from the scale that we put on. So I would say it's the same. We'll be opportunistic and look for opportunities in market. We've been building out Virginia on a de novo basis. So we've seen a lot of branch announcements in Northern Virginia. I think we are open to 2 more coming online in the near term. And then Richmond, we've been focusing on. So that's kind of happening organically. And then in the Carolinas, we're building out the Charlotte market, the intercity Charlotte market, [indiscernible] largely outside of the city of Charlotte. So that we're looking at opportunities to go in there. So you'll see some de novo expansion in those markets, which I think Charlotte, in particular, should bring us some good opportunities from a consumer and a small business perspective. We build out that channel.

Understood. You guys certainly have plenty of green shoots internally. Maybe last question for me, just a model refresher here. On the expense side, you have about a $7 million double carry from the excess lease expense while you're still leasing. Can you remind us, does that doesn't carry through to 2025? Is that correct? Or is there any kind of change in plans or timing with the move to the new building?

Yes, Kelly, it's Jim Dutey. That's exactly right. Yes. Once we move in, in fourth quarter is our planned movement data of about ’24 that double carry on the current leases that we have pull in. So it's not a carry forward in '25.

The next question comes from Brian Martin with Janney.

That -- net expense reduction, can you remind us what that is on the building and on the property?

It's basically the timing of our move, we lease a number of locations here because we have a lot of people spread across lab locations here in North Shore. So it was the timing, if the rent expense that started on the building. We're paying rent on all these other locations until we can shift into the building, which we're scheduled to do in November, early December this year. So the question was, what happens with that additional rent expense that goes away. So we're double -- right now, we have double expenses.

Brian, there's a footnote on the Slide 20, the guidance slide, which just report $7 million of renting expense. Yes. And we're not actually paying double -- it's -- we got free rent for the move, but from a GAAP accounting [indiscernible] we indirect you.

And then just on the funding cost, can you talk up -- I mean, can you give any sense on -- I know you talked about the margin inflecting as far as the cost of deposits kind of do those begin to plateau here? I guess they've been -- the rate of increase has obviously been narrowing. But just, I guess, when do you expect the deposit cost to kind of plateau?

I mean it's hard to say. I mean, it's still moving up a little bit. I mentioned the CD mix shift has definitely slowed quite a bit. So if you look at the total deposit costs at the end of on a spot basis in [indiscernible] with 204 in the first quarter. And if you went back, it's definitely an increase has slowed. I guess it becomes a function of -- what Chris was talking about earlier is if the Fed does cut and there's a expectation they're going to keep cutting obviously, that's giving more ability to raise that down. All the pieces on Slide 16 that I went through, there's a lot of levers there and flexibility that, again, if the expectation is that that's going to continue to cut after hopefully running in September, then a lot of those pieces are in play and have ability.

But I would say if you look at the makeup of the deposit base, it's not going to be -- I don't see pricing increasing draw in deposits. Like I said, we've seen a number of competitors reduced their promotional pricing. So I think it's more a function of shift. So are we able to hold the demand deposits to be able to hold the low-cost interest checking and we're able to hold that right without migration. I think the outflows have slowed dramatically. So we should be seeing initiatives that we're in right? New initiatives are focused more on lower cost deposit categories. So I think it would help us, but it's all a function of mix at this point.

And Brian, from a beta standpoint, I guess our beta has been very strong. The 38% versus the peers. We've been a good bit better than peers and we would expect that just too gradually go up a little bit more from here, probably similar to what it did kind of first to second quarter. So just as another indicator.

Yes. Okay. That's helpful. And then maybe just one for Gary. On the credit side, the stress testing, Gary, anything -- I mean, anything you're seeing from a sign of weakness or potential concerns given things sound very good and just the granularity and all the credit performance. But as you kind of do the stress test every quarter, is there anything coming up that's got you maybe more alerted to it, just paying closer attention to it?

Brian, I think over the last 3 quarters now, and we stress test, as you know, every quarter. Over the last 3 quarters, we've seen improvements from a potential charge-off and loss perspective. So those updates and those reviews around the severe economy continued to show improvement we're very, very aggressive in managing the book, as you all know. And that test that our team goes through each and every quarter is really showing positive results for us as we continue to migrate through the current economy.

Yes, that's -- sorry, okay. I think that's really it for me. I guess maybe one last just modeling question. I think did you guys mention that there was some impairment on the mortgage this quarter? Or was that -- did I not hear that right?

No, it's normal fair value marks on the overall portfolio. Brian, that's all. And I mean, acting any quarter-to-quarter, anywhere from $1 million one way to $1 million or $2 million one way to $1 million or $2 million the other way. So it was just kind of hedging the pipeline.

This concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Vincent Delie for any closing remarks.

Thank you. Thank you, everybody. I appreciate your interest and great questions. I hope we've answered everybody's questions. We're very optimistic as we move forward. I think we had a great opportunity. As we said in the previous call, we will go after market share because we were in a position to do that. I think we have a great opportunity to create some pretty positive financial outcomes as we move forward and execute our plans to drive deposit growth in the second half of the year. So really appreciate it and appreciate your interest and thank you again, and thank you to all of our employees for their hard work and a lot of listening. I know we all appreciate it. So thank you. Take care.

The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.