Hello and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Freshworks' Second Quarter 2023 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speakers' presentation, there'll be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions]. I would now like to hand the call over to Joon Huh.

Thank you. Good afternoon and welcome to Freshworks' second quarter 2023 earnings conference call. Joining me today are Girish Mathrubootham, Freshworks' Chief Executive Officer; Dennis Woodside, Freshworks' President; and Tyler Sloat, Freshworks' Chief Financial Officer. The primary purpose of today's call is to provide you with information regarding our second quarter 2023 performance and our financial outlook for our third quarter and full year 2023. Some of our discussion and responses to your questions may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are based on Freshworks' current expectations and estimates about its business and industry, including our financial outlook, macroeconomic uncertainties, management's beliefs and certain other assumptions made by the company, all of which are subject to change. These statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. Such risks include but are not limited to, our ability to sustain our growth, to innovate, to meet customer demand and to control costs and improve operating efficiency. For a discussion of material risks and other important factors that could affect our results, please refer to today's earnings release, our most recently filed Form 10-K and Form 10-Q and our other periodic filings with SEC. Freshworks assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements in order to reflect events or circumstances that may arise after the date of this call, except as required by law. During the course of today's call, we will refer to certain non-GAAP financial measures, reconciliations between GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures for historical periods are included in our earnings release, which is available on our Investor Relations website at ir.freshworks.com. I encourage you to visit our Investor Relations site to access our earnings release, supplemental earnings slides, periodic SEC reports, a replay of today's call or to learn more about Freshworks. And with that, let me turn it over to Girish.

Thank you, Joon, and welcome everyone. Thank you for joining us today on Freshworks earnings call covering our second quarter of 2023. We delivered a strong Q2 and outperformed our estimates across all our key financial metrics. Our revenue exceeded the high-end of our financial outlook range coming in at $145.1 million for the quarter. We continue to improve our business efficiency leading to free cash flow of $18.1 million, significantly surpassing our expectations. I'm really proud of our team effort this quarter. We made a number of operational changes at the beginning of the year to go after larger customers and target a more profitable segment of the market and we are starting to see the benefits in our results. As a reminder, we have included these financial highlights in the supplemental earnings slides on our Investor Relations website. We will also hold our first investor day on September 7 in San Francisco. I look forward to seeing you there. Now I'll get into our business drivers beginning with product innovation. In June, we showcased our Freddy AI strategy, introducing new generative AI capabilities that can be used across product lines. First, is Freddy Self-service, which helps businesses offer personalized customer and employee service with conversational bots. Next is Freddy Copilot, which is a personal assistant that works like an always on AI collaborator, offering contextual information and insight and offloading repetitive tasks. And finally, with Freddy Insights, we are leveraging AI to provide even more proactive insights and recommendations through a conversational interface. All three Freddy AI capabilities can help IT professionals, salespeople, marketers and support agents work more efficiently. Powered by Freddy AI, our self-service experience including fresh bots for CX and virtual agents in IT, assisted customers in more than 220 million interactions in Q2. Later…

Thanks, G and thank you everyone. We appreciate you joining us for today's call. As you can see in our Q2 results, we're starting to realize some of the benefits of the strategic go-to-market decisions we made earlier this year. We are seeing that our actions that set us on a path to win bigger deals, expand within existing accounts, and improve our operating efficiency are working to drive profitable growth for Freshworks. In January, we shifted our field teams to focus on landing bigger customers and this quarter, we began to see the results. In Q2 Freshworks customers paying us over $50,000 in ARR grew 33% year-over-year, up from the 30% growth we saw in Q1. This customer cohort now represents 46% of our ARR as larger customers are fueling the growth of our business. Recent examples include a large American consumer product company, a famous British car company, a well-known Japanese tech conglomerate, and Clopay Corporation. Clopay is North America's leading garage door manufacturer and came to Freshworks to improve customer engagement. The increasing multi-channel interactions with garage door dealers through calls, mobile chats, website forms, and physical walk-ins necessitated a unified platform for a better agent and customer experience. Clopay chose Freshdesk, Freshchat and Freshcolor to achieve this and continues to see significant customer service benefits. Also in January, we solidified teams dedicated to ensuring our customers succeed and grow with us. We are seeing results from that change in Q2. Of our net customer adds over $50,000 in ARR, the majority is coming from expansion. Our net expansion for our mid-market and enterprise accounts was 12%, which is well above the average rate for the company. Our average realized price per seat for ITSM for which we issued price changes in January increased by 4%, and…

Thanks, Dennis, and thanks again to everyone for joining us. Once again, we had a strong quarter in Q2. We beat our revenue growth estimates and create significant leverage in the business to expand both non-GAAP operating and free cash flow margins by 5 percentage points quarter-over-quarter. We are starting to realize the financial benefits resulting from the operational changes made earlier in the year, and we're creating a healthier foundation to position the business for profitable long-term growth. For our call today, I'll cover the Q2 financial results, provide background on the key metrics and close with our forward-looking commentary and expectations for Q3 and the full year 2023. I'll include constant currency comparisons for certain metrics to provide a better view of our business trends. And as a reminder, most of our discussion will be focused on non-GAAP financial results, which exclude the impact of stock-based compensation expenses and other adjustments. Starting with the income statement. Revenue grew 20% year-over-year, adjusting for constant currency. On an as-reported basis, revenue grew 19% to $145.1 million as we saw negative impacts on currency rates for the dollar against the euro and pound over the past year. New business strength in ITSM continued to drive much of the growth in Q2, while expansion rates overall ticked down slightly in the quarter. In Q2, our non-GAAP gross margins increased 1 percentage point quarter-over-quarter to 84% as a result of efficiency improvements on our infrastructure spend, AWS costs and other one-time items. Our non-GAAP operating expenses were relatively flat quarter-over-quarter and down more than $5 million year-over-year. The majority of the decrease year-over-year was driven by lower sales and marketing expenses of $4 million as we improved spend in our go-to-market efforts. This includes shifting focus towards a more durable, higher-yielding customer base.…

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] And our first question comes from Brent Bracelin with Piper Sandler. Please proceed.

Thank you for taking the question. Good afternoon. Obviously, it looks like fundamentals here are stabilizing. Dennis, maybe for you, could you double click into the acceleration you saw in the [50,000k] [ph] cohort. I think it looked like the acceleration there improved from a 30% growth to 33%. Is that tied to some of the changes you made in internal execution? Or do you think there's something else that's resonating with those larger customers about the product? Thanks.

Thanks for the question, Brent. So absolutely, we are starting to realize the benefits, a lot of the changes that we made back in January and that has enabled us to create an even stronger and healthier base of these larger customers to grow from. Our product has advanced at a very high rate over the last couple of years. If you look at the ITSM products specifically. We have ITSM, we have ITOM, we have ESM now. All those are resonating in the market and our sellers are doing quite well. So we're getting more at that and we've just put more wood behind the not huge deals, but slightly larger deals and you're seeing that in the numbers for sure.

It comes from the line of Ryan MacWilliams with Barclays. Please proceed.

Hey, guys. Thanks for taking the question. Really excited to see the AI product announcements coming. Tyler, just on the contribution from the AI products and the new pricing. Are these contemplated in forward guidance? And I guess, how do you envision this layering into your model in the coming quarters or years? Thanks.

Hey, Ryan. Thanks for the question. So no, we actually haven't built in any upside from the products and the pricing changes that are coming forward because I think it is so early that we'll have to learn. But our guidance is essentially reflective of what we see today based on what we have and what we expect to sell without any upside from AI.

Great. And also pleased to see the strong profitability improvement in the quarter. What were some of the drivers there? And are there any changes in the head count materially contributed to this improvement? Thanks.

Yes, you're right. We're really excited about the kind of efficiency initiatives that we put in place at the beginning of the year and how those have played out. And we've always thought we've had leverage in the model and can feel like we continue to have leverage in the model, which we obviously built that into a lot of our guidance going forward. Head count wise, we haven't had to do anything dramatic. We've actually just been moving to kind of culture performance and everything else as we move forward and making sure we have the right people in the right places.

It comes from the line of Pinjalim Bora with JPMorgan. Please proceed.

Congrats on the quarter. One question on just maybe talk about your conversations with your customers about kind of appetite for AI and a Copilot, trying to understand how should we think of kind of the ramp or uptake of Freddy Copilot within the CX business? And how are you thinking of pricing kind of the other copilots and self-serve and insight tools?

Hey, Pinjalim. Thanks for the question. This is Girish. So we are working -- first of all, our Freddy Copilot is -- think of it as an AI assistant for all of our users, whether it's customer service people or sales folks, et cetera. So we have several early adopter customers who we are working with in terms of seeing it. One example I can give you is a customer -- a shipping and postal company in New York is actually using this customer service people are using some of the early features that we launched in terms of creating replies for customers, summarizing it and things like that. So we also are looking at making sure that the Copilot can help automate routine manual tasks. So we are excited. We are in like more than 2,000 customers that we are working with as early adopters. So we are trying to monetize the Copilot soon in a matter of time.

Interesting. Got it. Thanks. And on free cash flow, it seems like, if I remember that correctly, I think when you entered the year, it was about $10 million for the year and then you went to $20 million, now you're talking about $60 million. How much of that ramp is because of this change in duration towards annual?

Yes, I would say not that impacted. It does have a little bit of impact to our billings numbers. But the actual change in annual collections that's not really driving our operational kind of performance. A lot of it is around just prudence that we've had on the cost side and prudence around hiring. The duration billing is pretty nominal.

[Operator Instructions]. It comes from the line of Brian Peterson with Raymond James. Please proceed.

Congrats on the quarter. Just one for me. On AI and all the product announcements you have, I know there's a lot of in-market products that you're already selling today, but I'd love to understand on the sales and marketing front, as AI becomes more commonplace, do you think that changes kind of the medium-term ramp for those products as they build from where they are today? I hope I can get some perspective on that. Thanks guys.

Sure, Brian. I'll take that. So this is a quick brief. We announced Freddy Self-service for customer and employee self-service. Freddy Copilot, which is like an AI assistant for our users and then Freddy Insights for data driven and insight leaders. So what we're trying to do is, like on August 3 when we are launching our new customer service suite, we will be monetizing our Freddy Self-service product through our Freshbots. And then our copilot, which we are thinking of -- it will be priced at $29 per agent but it will be monetized later. We are still working with early adopter customers, as we mentioned, and Freddy Insights will follow that soon.

It comes from the line of Patrick Walravens with JMP Securities. Please go ahead.

Congratulations on the second really good quarter in a row. So G, one area that I've been wondering a lot about is sort of the resources that you need to deliver generative AI solutions. So in particular, do you have enough sort of PhD level AI talent to design these? And then do you have access to the GPUs for the trading and [indiscernible]?

So Pat, we are making those investments. So we have -- like I don't know the exact count of how many PhDs we have, but we have AI leaders from Microsoft who have much some experience working in our team. So we are also working with some of the technology providers, whether it's Azure, Open AI or some of the other leading providers out there. We are also in the process of investing in AI to kind of build domain-specific and customer-specific large language models. So as part of that, we are thinking of setting up some AI labs in India. So that is in the plan.

Great. And then what about -- all this NVIDIA stuff, how hard is it to actually get access to the GPU power that you need to train these models?

Yes. I think we have heard Sathya Nadella say that if that becomes a scarcity to cause disruption. So that is one of the reasons why we want to set up investments so that we have access to that. And some of our -- like we see investors have also offered us access to GPUs through their connect. So I think we are -- for now, we don't face shortage, but like we are all waiting to see how things play out in the future.

It comes from the line of DJ Hynes with Canaccord Genuity. Please proceed.

Tyler, I want to ask on the billings guide. So look, if my numbers are right, I think in Q1, it was 20% constant currency growth. This quarter improved to 21% normalized. I think you said you're guiding to 17% in Q3. I mean from all the qualitative, quantitative commentary, it sounds like you guys feel pretty good about business momentum. I'm just wondering if that's like typical prudence or are you seeing something in the business that would suggest things might slow again in Q3. Just any kind of high-level thoughts there would be helpful.

Yes. Thanks, DJ. No, we really are trying to call it as we see it. We don't see a slowdown per se. We did say that we expect net dollar retention to kind of come down to 105%, 106%. We had actually expected a little bit higher churn coming into the year. We didn't see it in Q1. Q2 ticked up slightly, but it actually was better than our expectations. We do still think there's going to be some continued pressure there, and that's why we're saying it's going to come down. And then the expansion motion, which we started talking about at the beginning of last year, is still seeing pressure. And so what we're trying to do is just call it as we see it, and then obviously, we will update it as we go along.

It comes from the line of Elizabeth Porter with Morgan Stanley. Please proceed.

I wanted to ask about the move up market and pricing, you guys have expanded the portfolio, which along with the go-to-market motion, has allowed you to be more successful upmarket. Yet pricing still largely balances being able to address both the low-end of customers and the high-end of customers. I know you called out price increases in ITSM. But just more broadly, how do you think about pricing as a lever as you focus more on upmarket customers? Thank you.

Elizabeth, it's Dennis. Thanks for the question. We see pricing as a lever that we absolutely are going to be focused on. We made our -- one of our first pricing moves this year in our IT suite, where we took prices up. And as I said in the remarks, we saw about a 4% price increase realized there and that the way we roll prices out, it's for net new customers and then renewing customers. We're seeing an opportunity with renewing customers across all products to realize more price as we have deals that are coming up for renewal that may have been on higher levels of discount than we need to make today, given the rapid advance of the product and the value that we're delivering to those customers. And that also is a lever for us to bring ARPA up, and you're seeing it in the ARPA numbers. So I think as the company gets better at thinking about price and pricing to value, price will become a bigger lever for us going forward. It's absolutely one of those things I'm focused on. And we want to preserve our position in the marketplace. We still have a meaningful TCO advantage against all of our competitors, both in terms of our ticket prices as well as the actual cost of implementing our software. So we have room for sure. We want to be thoughtful about any kind of price changes, but there's absolutely room for us to be more sophisticated about pricing. You're seeing it with the AI pricing as well, where we're going to be pricing our AI add-on at about $29 a seat. You're seeing it with bot pricing, which we're going to announce later this week a revised bot pricing scheme, which will allow us to monetize bots at a higher rate.

It comes from the line of Taylor McGinnis with UBS. Please proceed.

So the billings performance relative to the guide was really solid. And if I adjust for days in the quarter, it looks like the sequential growth in the 3Q guide is roughly a point stronger than what you guided to in 2Q. I know that you said churn picked up a little. But I guess, how would you characterize the demand environment in June and July versus what we've seen previously? Are we starting to lap some of the rightsizing or slower expansion activity that could be helping? Are you seeing signs of improvement, or is it largely just driven by some of the sales changes you've made?

Yes. I think largely, it's gone along as we expected, Taylor. I mean, clearly, our guidance is taken into -- affect all the information we know right now. And so in terms of how the quarter is going, it's as expected. The guide, like I said earlier, we are really trying to call it as we see it. I think if you look at billings, it was impacted slightly by kind of a move to larger customers that tend to pay annually in advance. And specifically, our new business in Q2 was really strong, specifically with ITSM in the field motion. We would expect that to continue, but we built all that kind of into our guidance.

It comes from the line of Adam Bergere with Bank of America. Please proceed.

Can you expand on any differences you may be seeing in demand expansion or churn in front office versus back office solutions? For example, just comparing maybe the CRM business versus Freshservice. And then, also just thinking about front office versus back office, what do you think will have, which will AI have a greater value proposition for? Thanks.

One I start and then have G talk about some of the AI stuff. I think, generally speaking, let me just start kind of a little bit higher level. In terms of new business, we're seeing IT in particular, do very well. And I think that's partly because the product has come a long way. We've introduced ITOM ESM capabilities and a number of other aspects of functionality that makes the product really suitable for that solid mid-market business, which for us is about a 5,000 employee company. Our largest customers tend to be more of the customer service product set. And that's because we tend to have a lot more agents in a customer support team than you do over in IT. So we see quite a bit of expansion there. We are seeing, as we move into larger accounts, those larger accounts are expanding at higher rates than our smaller accounts, and that's also helping us drive or sustain the net expansion rate that we've seen. So I think the demand is slightly different than that. We are seeing very strong demand on the IT side. We're seeing more muted demand for new business on the CX side. We're seeing reasonable demand, I would say, on the expand motion for CX and IT is a newer product or newer, large installed base there, the expansion motion also is quite good with products like ESM, that gives us a whole new expansion motion for those customers. So that gives you a little bit of a flavor. And Gee, maybe you can talk about the AI stuff?

Yes. I'd quickly add, Adam, while we expect AI adoption and transformation across all products, I think the biggest change is going to come or the demand is going to come from customers self-service in the front office.

It comes from the line of Alex Zukin with Wolfe Research. Please proceed.

Just two quick ones for me. So if we step back and think about just the arc of the demand trends and optimization trends in your end markets, as we look -- kind of coming out of the quarter versus going in, are we through kind of peak pain in your market? You had monthly contracts you were first in and arguably maybe even first out from some of these optimization trends. But can you maybe just comment, I'm not asking for the all clear, but just conceptualize kind of as you see the demand patterns evolving coming out of this quarter, you mentioned it was a little bit better on the retention front than you were anticipating. I understand the guidance, but just help us understand that. And I've got a quick follow-up on AI.

Yes. Alex. This is Tyler. I'll take that one. I think just in terms of the demand trends, I think they are kind of staying relatively constant, meaning that we do expect there to be continued pressure on the expansion motion and we do think there's going to be a little bit of increased pressure on churn, which is why we're saying, hey, we think net dollar retention could be 105%, 106%. We do think it will stabilize there. And a lot of it is how just the number is calculated with the year-over-year and as we kind of annualize some of the stuff that happened last year. So from that perspective, okay, we think there's still going to be a little pressure there. On the field motion, we mentioned, like we had some really good new business in the field and some really good execution and a lot of recipes for our products mean that the markets are really receptive specifically for Freshservice, and we would expect that to continue.

Just to add a little bit more color there. So remember the TAM in the markets that we're playing in are massive and relatively fragmented. Yes, there are large competitors, but there's a lot of room. There's still a lot of legacy players that are not innovating as fast as we are, and our product is improving every month. So we have a lot of runway. The changes that we made on go-to-market and just driving this more balanced focus on both inbound and outbound sales, SMB, mid-market and enterprise, bringing in the leadership in the teams that can build a very large field business. Those changes just happened in Q1. So we're starting, as we said in the kind of the opening, we're starting to see the impact but there's a long way to go. And I think there's a lot of upside. We're seeing more of that in more big deals than we ever had. We're closing more big deals every quarter than we ever had in prior quarters. We have goals around a number of, as an example, 30k deals that we need to close in a quarter. Last quarter, we handily beat that goal, and those numbers go up every quarter. So I think that the long-term mark is still -- we're still pretty early in that and how the go-to-market changes are going to play out in the business, and we're feeling really good about how that's going to take us.

So that's super insightful. I'm going to -- and hopefully, I'm going to roll with the conceptual questions, but I want to ask one about AI because Dennis, you mentioned pricing and G, you talked about pricing a few times on this call. And look, I think everyone is a little struck by some of the pricing announcements for AI SKUs for the copilots. You talked about $30. I think that's -- if the largest adoption is going to come from Freshsales and Pros, your most popular SKU, that's a 60% uplift on customers that would be adopting Pro, that's obviously at less price. But just help us understand, like I guess, the rationale for that pricing, why that's going to drive success. And ultimately, I know you're not guiding to it, but as we think about either how this layers into driving greater adoption of specific products or adoption of the copilot SKU within your cohorts. Like what's the -- at a high level, the uplift or the growth tailwind over time we should expect from AI layering into the model?

So Alex, I think it's still early days. I can give you a brief on, how we are thinking about the pricing. We have still not decided on which plans exactly are going to have the $29 add-on. Are we going to make it available for everybody? But the whole idea is to look at it from a productivity standpoint, hey, if agents are going to be, like say, 20%, 30%, 40% more productive because the copilot helps them get their job done faster and automates like routine task for them, then businesses are going to save on agent costs. And so like if it's a 20% productivity, like how can we actually capture some of that value? So that's the thought process in terms of how we are thinking about this. But I think it's a win-win for both customers and Freshworks. But still early days, and maybe we'll have more color for you in our Investor Day on September 7.

It comes from the line of Rob Oliver with Baird. Please proceed.

Dennis, I appreciate all the color you've given in the prepared remarks and in response to the questions on that over $50,000 cohort, which sounds like it's going really well. I just wanted to ask on that. You did say at the outset that multiproduct is now up to 25% of customers. So since the IPO, you guys have done a nice job sort of migrating that up. When you look at the enterprise opportunity and today, maybe the NRR expansion you're seeing there, is that mostly just seat expansions within core products already sold? Or are you already seeing meaningful cross-sell of, say, Freshservice into Freshdesk? And maybe if you could just talk a little bit about that opportunity for you guys, that would be helpful.

Yes. So I would say the strength is a combination of net new business. So a number of the wins that I talked about, like the large steel company, well, actually, that was an expansion, b, the net new still is a big part of our growth story. And really, that's because you have a lot of vendors or a lot of customers who are coming up on a 3-year contract, a 2-year contract. We were not really in the mid-market game 2 or 3 years ago, and they're looking for an alternative that provides higher value, a modern interface for their agents and fast time to value. We offer all that. So we're getting more and more of those that's on the new side. On the expansion side, we are seeing the opportunity to cross-sell true cross-persona sales. And an example with the steel company that I mentioned in the remarks, that's an example of that kind of a cross-sell the Trainline, another example of a cross persona sale where, I think we started out on the sports side and moved into the IT side. So one of the things that we did at the beginning of the year is separate, remember the kind of the hunting motion from the farming motion. And we need to perfect the art of going out and winning new business, and we need to perfect the art of seeing opportunities within existing accounts, servicing new needs and then getting in front of the right decision makers to prove what we have, a solution that we have and add value to their business. And that's where we're starting to see that pay off in these true cross-persona sales, that's where you get the big expansions. So that's a little bit of color of kind of how we're thinking about the opportunity there.

It comes from the line of Brian Schwartz with Oppenheimer & Company.

Congratulations on a real nice quarter. Just one more on the AI topic. G, maybe just to ask you a question on thinking about the right pace of adoption within the installed base for the AI products. Is there any way of comparing that to any of your previous product launches or -- any insights on how we should think about the uptake of those products as they continue to get rolled out? Thank you.

So thanks for the question, Brian. So I think first thing we are excited about is the August 3 launch of our modern customer service suite. So we think that actually represents what could be the future of how customer service should look like starting from Gen AI based and natural language conversational self-service, handing off seamlessly through human agent support and then enabling seamless collaboration with ticketing. So we're bringing it all together. Also, our customers who use standalone or buying standalone Freshdesk or Freshchat products will also have access to this. But it's not a onetime event, Brian. So there is a lot of stuff that we are going to continuously keep building in terms of all these three pillars of self-service as well as copilot as well as insights. So I think we will continue to see a rolling thunder kind of adoption as opposed to one big band adoption.

It comes from the line of Brent Thill with Jefferies. Please proceed.

Dennis, you mentioned the go-to-market changes in Q1. I'm curious how far are you into those changes? Do you have more that you're making, or do you feel that the go-to-market sales team is in the right spot, you're going to run this playbook in the current form? Any more color in terms of how you're thinking about that would be helpful.

I think we're getting there, but there's still more work to do. So remember, think of our business as an inbound business, which is very meaningful for us, a lot of our larger accounts started out as an inbound lead and then you've got the outbound business. And a lot of the commentary that I've had has been focused on the outbound business because that's to me coming in, that was such the kind of the near-term and clear opportunity. One of the areas that we've been focusing on more recently is that inbound business. And really, okay, now that we've kind of got what we think is outbound on the right track, we're getting the right people in, we're starting to see some traction. What can we do in that inbound business to really fire that up. And I was talking about cross-sell before, getting better at cross-sell, servicing other products in, if you're in Freshsales, surfacing Freshservice, those sorts of things are tactics that we can do much better than we've done in the past and we're starting to invest in. So really getting back to that product-led growth thesis and bringing some innovation to how our products can grow themselves. That's another area of growth for us. So I think that we're just finding more and more pockets of growth in the business. On the field side, the leaders that we brought in really have joined us in the last two quarters. So it takes time for them to get up to speed. They need to get their teams kind of focused in a way that they want. And we believe that's going to continue to pay off throughout the rest of this year. But Q2 was a good indicator that the changes are taking root and that we've got a lot of opportunity if we can get this right.

It comes from the line of Scott Berg with Needham & Company. Please proceed.

Congrats on a really nice quarter. And thanks for taking my question. I guess I also have a question for Dennis on the upmarket traction that you're having there. I think we probably all agree Dennis, at least from the outside looking in, that your success in a short timeframe of markets probably a lot better than what we all expected. But how do you think about what that trajectory looks like? Can you move even further into the enterprise, or do you think you have a targeted end market that I don't know, reflects the high-end of the mid-market, low-end of the enterprise, however you're structuring it? And then within that, do you think about competitors any differently if you try to target even further upmarket? Thank you.

Yes. So we think of our ICP today really is that 5,000 person solid mid-market business, right? Where you have a sophisticated IT team, you have a demanding internal audience if it's on the IT side or you have a demanding customer base if you're talking on the customer support side. You need to offer on the customer support side, the kind of conversational interface that their end customers are demanding, chat and tech service, all that stuff. And you want something that's fast time to value, you can't afford or you don't want to pay for a large group of consultants just to implement your product. That's where we really shine. Now that said, more and more larger companies are demonstrating those characteristics. So the steel company that I mentioned, actually there's a second steel company that we won this quarter. In both cases, they were looking for a solution that was easier to use, to implement, to modify workflows for, to solve for their -- in both cases, IT issues. And so some of these larger companies that are well above that 5,000 person ICT, they are demonstrating similar characteristics, and that's where we have an opportunity at that lower end of the enterprise today. Now as our product matures, and we have a very exciting roadmap for both the CRM products and the IT products. As they mature, that's going to open up more and more opportunity for us. So the art is to make sure that you're focused on the near term at the areas that have the highest opportunity and then pick off those larger accounts that happen to be demonstrating the characteristics that you know you can satisfy and then gradually moving more and more upmarket. So I don't think that -- we think that there's a hard limit on where we can go just based on the customers we have today. We just have to be thoughtful about how we get there.

It's coming from the line of Nick Altmann with Scotiabank. Please proceed.

Awesome. Thanks guys for taking the question. The margins in the quarter and the free cash flow guide was very impressive. So I guess my question is really around the trade-off of growth versus margin improvements. I know there's some one-time items this year, but some of the underlying metrics suggest that there is some level of stabilization. So I guess, with that in mind, how are you guys sort of thinking about margin leverage over the coming years in a time where things seem to be stabilizing, the go-to-market tweaks seem to be working nicely and you have a handful of new exciting SKUs coming online.

Yes. Nick. This is Tyler. I'll answer that. You're right. We've actually had great performance on the bottom-line and margins doing really well. We've always said we thought we had leverage in the model and we kind of just really focused on that. Now we do want to be clear, when we are not producing cash and profits at the expense of growth. And we're going to continue to invest in our go-to-market motions and in the [net machine] [ph]. We want to make sure those are efficient investments that we get back the right returns. But we are really focused on continuing to invest there and continue to grow and to fuel that growth. And we're going to do the same next year. And this is something we'll probably talk about a bit in our Investor Day on September 7 as we kind of break that down, but absolutely, we think there's a huge opportunity across all our product lines and we're going to continue to fund, capturing market for those opportunities.

Thank you, everybody, for your time. This is the end of the Q&A. Thank you all for participating, and you may now disconnect.