Thank you for holding, and welcome everyone to the TechnipFMC Second Quarter 2023 Earnings Conference Call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speakers' remarks, there will be a question and answer session. [Operator Instructions] Thank you. I will now turn the call over to Matt Seinsheimer, Senior Vice President, Investor Relations and Corporate Development. Mr. Seinsheimer, please go ahead.

Thank you, Jack. Good morning and good afternoon, and welcome to TechnipFMC’s second quarter 2023 earnings conference call. Our news release and financial statements issued earlier today can be found on our website. I would like to caution you with respect to any forward looking statements made during this call. Although these forward looking statements are based on our current expectations, beliefs and assumptions regarding future developments and business conditions, they are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by these statements. Non-material factors that could cause our actual results to differ from our projected results are described in our most recent 10-K, most recent 10-Q and other periodic filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. We wish to caution you not to place undue reliance on any forward looking statements which speak only as of the date hereof. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any of our forward looking statements after the date they are made, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. I will now turn the call over to Doug Pferdehirt, TechnipFMC’s Chair and Chief Executive Officer.

Thank you, Matt. Good morning and good afternoon and thank you for participating in today’s earnings call. Our second quarter results reflect both strong operational performance and the achievement of several financial commitments. Subsea inbound orders were 4.1 billion in the period representing a book-to-bill of 2.5. We delivered strong sequential improvement in adjusted EBITDA margin for both Subsea and Surface technologies, including a 420 basis point increase in Subsea to 14.4%, the highest quarterly margin since 2018. Free cash flow was 103 million in the quarter and just yesterday we provided two updates to our plans for shareholder distributions. With the first being the initiation of a quarterly dividend and the second announcing the doubling of our previous share buyback authorization to $800 million. Alf will cover these updates in more detail. When taken together, these successes demonstrate that we are clearly focused on what we believe to be the most important drivers of shareholder value. Continuing with total company financial highlights in the quarter revenue was 2 billion. Adjusted EBITDA was 254 million with an adjusted EBITDA margin of 12.9%, when excluding foreign exchange impacts. Total company inbound for the period was 4.4 billion. Total company backlog ended the period at 13.3 billion. Subsea backlog grew 29% sequentially to 12.1 billion, of which 81% will be converted into revenue beyond the current year. I would like to take a moment to highlight the quality of the inbound secured in the period. Subsea orders included six integrated projects, including the direct award of our largest iEPCI to date a contract from Equinor for the BM-C-33 development in Brazil year. Year-to-date, iEPCI has accounted for more than 50% of our order intake. We continue to expect iEPCI to achieve its highest ever inbound in 2023, enabled by a record level…

Thanks Doug. Revenue in the quarter was 2 billion. EBITDA was 254 million when excluding, foreign exchange loss. The impact of the previously disclosed legal settlement and restructuring and other charges. Operationally, we delivered strong sequential results. In Subsea revenue was 1.6 billion, up 17% from the first quarter. The increase was largely due to higher project activity in South America, the North Sea and the Gulf of Mexico. Services revenue also increased when compared to the first quarter due to seasonal improvement, including higher installation and intervention activity. Adjusted EBITDA was 234 million with a margin of 14.4%, up 420 basis points from the first quarter. Results benefited from the higher revenue, improved margins in backlog and increased installation in services activity. In Surface Technologies revenue was 354 million, up 7% from the first quarter. Revenue increased primarily due to higher activity in the Middle East and North America. Adjusted EBITDA was 47 million a 16% sequential increase. Results benefited from higher revenue and improved operational performance. Adjusted EBITDA margin was 13.3%, up 110 basis points versus the first quarter. Turning to corporate and other items in the period. Corporate expense was 154 million excluding a non-recurring legal settlement charge, totaling 127 million corporate expense was 27 million. The non-recurring legal settlement charge in the period was related to the resolution of all outstanding matters with a French National Prosecutor's Office. As previously disclosed technique, TechnipFMC is responsible for 195 million of the legal settlement. The charge represented an increase to the existing provision to now reflect the value of the total liability. Net interest expense was 30 million and lastly, tax expense in the quarter was 43 million. Cashflow from operating activities was 156 million. Capital expenditures were 53 million. This resulted in free cash flow of 103…

[Operator Instructions] David Anderson with Barclays. Your line is open.

So the massive Subsea order intake this quarter sort of speaks for itself in the wake of all the offshore FIDs we saw this quarter. So just curious in your view that incremental billion dollars that you are looking on the order outlook this year. Are these orders being pulled forward, kind of compared to what you were expecting or are these on top of what you internally forecast as it relates to that three-year order outlook that you provided earlier this year? Thanks.

Thanks Dave. I appreciate it. I think that is an important that we clarify. The strength of the first half is obviously exceptional including this quarter, which was truly exceptional. Not just in quantity but in quality. And that is why I really tried to emphasize that in my script. We continue to be very selective. We are humbled and honored to be in a position to do so. And we clearly demonstrated in the prepared remarks the quality of that inbound in the quarter. As we look forward, we remain deeply committed to the 25 billion by 2025. There's no concern, if you will, about things being pulled forward. We are very confident, even more so obviously, but remain extremely confident in the 2025 outlook for 25 billion by 2025. What's kind of unique about the strength of the first half of the year is it is actually enabled us to take a view of 2024, which is a, I know a bit earlier than we normally would, but I'm actually going to let Alf share the good news.

Well, thank you Doug. Yes, clearly the strong Q3 inbound, which primarily really will impact revenue in 2024 and beyond is going to be very beneficial for us to move forward with an outlook here. So this is an early look. So, as I mentioned in my prepared remarks, our updated company guidance for full-year 2023 is approximately 880 million of adjusted EBITDA excluding the foreign exchange component. And that implies roughly a 30% growth versus 2022. So now if you take that and look into next year, and given the strength of the first half of inbound and given, how much of that will actually impact 2024 and given how much, how the quality of that inbound and how much that helps the margin embedded in the backlog, my confidence in our ability to successfully meet our commitments. On top of that, I believe we can deliver growth in adjusted EBITDA of 35% in 2024.

So that was actually where I was going. My follow-up question I guess is sort of related to this. I'm just curious about manufacturing utilization and, and how that might change in the next coming 12 to 24-months. And maybe you just answered part of that just with the surge of orders in the first half of the year. Doug, I think you said 70% of the inbound this year is Subsea 2.0 or somewhere thereabouts. Even if the orders - even if the peso orders were to slow a bit in the second half, I'm just wondering, would you expect to be kind of close to full utilization or at least what you would consider optimal manufacturing utilization. How about the back part of 2024? Just sort of thinking about Subsea margin progression lighter the higher than expected throughput next year and into 2025?

Sure, Dave. So, we laid out already our ambition for 2025 to take Subsea margins all the way to 18%. We updated that I think just a couple of quarters ago. Obviously having these high quality orders and one way that we define that is, as you just described, which is Subsea 2.0, gives us that greater confidence. And it is not only the confidence to be able to achieve the margins, but also to be able to take the volume and give our customers the confidence to be able to give us the orders because they have seen the profound change that Subsea 2.0 or the configure-to-order operating model has had on our company. And they have all been on this journey with us. The vast majority of them have spent considerable time within our facilities. They see what it does to the pace and the cadence and the throughput, which is what really allows us to be able to continue to enjoy the success and have confidence in the road that we are on. And I will always repeat what we said here a few quarters ago, which are these are major milestones, but they are just major milestones and a more ambitious journey.

Understood thanks dough. I appreciate it.

Arun Jayaram with JPMorgan Securities. Your line is open.

Doug, I wanted to get your thoughts on just the quality or mix of orders that you are seeing this year, you now expect 70% of your orders to be integrated services, direct awards or subsea services. And I just wonder if you could talk about how the market is evolving for Subsea 2.0? And how does the favorable mix - how does that impact your thoughts on your 2025 margin guide of 18% in Subsea?

Thank you, Arun. Clearly, the market has spoken both in terms of Subsea 2.0 and in terms of iEPCI, both setting a record this quarter iEPCI now achieving 50%. It is quite remarkable. And again, we remain very humbled with the level of confidence and trust that our clients put into our company. These are major projects, but they do so because of the company that has been created and because of the operating model that exists. Their greatest focus is on ensuring quality capacity within the industry. And we have demonstrated time and time again to them through - this isn't the first quarter or first year that we have been doing this. We have been doing this for a few years now, to where they really have all enjoyed the benefits associated with our new operating model and our ability to be able to give them the confidence that we will be able to deliver a project safely, on time and on budget, and that really remains the primary focus for them. So look, I think the 70% is a phenomenal metric. And it is one that is unique to our company, but it is one that we cherish, and it is one that we don't see any reason that it is going to vary in any great degree from that 70% because, again, our journey is not done. And everything that we are talking about today, we are well into the next generations of the way of the operating model as well as the innovation and the technology that we are bringing into the market, both for the traditional energy, but as well for the new energy market. So high level of confidence, Arun, it just gives you that much more certainty because you know what you are putting through your facilities, you know the work that you are performing. And it is not just us, it is our supply chain which we depend upon their performance and they get the same benefits as we do from this high-quality inbound.

Great. My follow-up, Doug, I was wondering if you could describe what you are seeing in some of the emerging offshore basins more exploration-driven Patrick at Total had some positive comments on Suriname, and we did note that you raised in your subsidy opportunity list the potential project size to over $1 billion in Block 58. So wondering if you could give us a sense of what you are seeing in some of these emerging deepwater basins. Suriname, Namibia, et cetera?

Sure. I mean that is - we can add South Africa, Tanzania, Colombia, the Eastern Med resurgence in Mexico and Mozambique, all, if you will, to that list. The first two being ones that there's a lot of eyes upon being both Suriname and Namibia important to note that in our $25 billion inbound objective, it is really not depending upon these emerging basins, which give the strength to the what happens in the latter part and into the next decade, which is when these projects will continue to add it to a significant level of subsea opportunities going forward. Look, I don't have any unique and I certainly wouldn't share - be respectful of our customers who speak often about their exploration and their focus area. I think if you just follow kind of the exploration activity and the rig contracts that are being taken on I would consider that to be a level of enthusiasm and is certainly attractive enough to draw the capital into those basins. We remain very focused. Our intent is certainly to treat those basins and to create early success as we have done in Guyana and Mozambique. And that is by working very closely with our partners, building upon our long-term relationship and bringing them something that is unique and different from the rest of the market, and that is the iEPCI 2.0.

Great, I will handle it back. Thanks Dough.

Luke Lemoine with Piper Sandler. Your line is open.

You just had a monster quarter in orders and raised your guide for the year, but this doesn't include any 2.0, which you have talked about could be I believe, over $8 billion in orders through 2030. Can you talk more about this product? When do you think an order can be received and maybe how conversations are going with customers?

Sure, Luke. Thanks. Actually, it was a pretty big quarter for us in terms of our milestone on the journey. We have been working through a joint industry program with all of the major players that you would expect and they are actually working with us on a standard all electric system that will provide them the - will fulfill the opportunity set that they need. At the same time, and I talked about this maybe a quarter - this - maybe last quarter or the quarter before, but what's really drawing our attention is the CC U.S. or, in particular, what we call the integrated carbon transportation system, where we will be taking from the emitter and taking the CO2 offshore and injecting it Subsea, which would certainly be the most favorable way to do it, both from an ESG point of view and from a social point of view as well. So the CO2 market is really looking like it is going to benefit from our configurable [eCO2.0] (Ph), as we call it. It is a tree that is designed to be unique for that application, and we are seeing several opportunities for that at this time as well. The benefit we have is we have over 600 systems installed using our all electric technology, mainly around the valve actuation. So they have been in the water a long time. They have been tested for a long time. They are the industry standard. So we will be able to build upon that as we build out the complete subsea all electric architecture. And I do want to include our relationship we have with Halliburton in that as well because it is also about providing electric controls in the wellbore as well that don't rely on electric hydraulic, which then we can go to an all-electric system. So I think what we have put together between our own technology and that with our partners is quite unique. And we continue to be excited, not only again for the traditional energy, but also for the CO2 market when it comes to all electric systems.

Alright, great. Thanks Dough.

Kurt Hallead with the Benchmark Company. Your line is open.

So Doug, yes, I wanted to maybe get a little bit more insight around this competitive moat that FTI has been able to develop with the Subsea 2.0 as well as the iEPCI, et cetera. And you kind of heavily emphasize the amount of business that is coming in because of that dynamic. So how much of a competitive moat is that how long can you sustain it? And what are the key factors for an oil company when they are deciding to kind of go with what you are doing? Is it economics related? Is it execution related? Just wanted to give a little bit more color because I know the real - you got a lot of opportunities here extending out into the end of the decade. And clearly, the oil companies find a lot of value in what you are doing. So just looking for more and more color on that.

Sure, Kurt. So first and foremost, we are extremely respectful of our competition and respect what they do. We have chosen to take a different path. We started that an earn back in 2014 - or 2015, you could argue as early as 2014 in terms of the Subsea 2.0 engineering work that went into the development of the configurable system. But that led to a joint venture, which led to the creation of TechnipFMC back on the 17th of January 2017. It is really a combination. I mean, we are doing things differently. We believe it is better, but again, be respectful of what they are doing. And on top of that, we have built deep relationships with our customers where they know they can trust us and they know that we are focused on this business. We are a pure play, this is what we do. We believe we do it very well, but we enjoy doing it, and this is what we want to do. And our challenge that we put in front of ourselves every day is to ensure that we create success for our customers and to make sure that the offshore market continues to economically be robust for them. And how do we do that? And this factors into maybe the second part of your question, is we do that by a relentless focus on certainty because what they are looking at right now is an economic view that yes, there is a capital cost to do the project, ,but it is the certainty in the delivery of the project and when the economics start to get negatively affected, it is when projects are delivered late. And we are out there giving our customers a value proposition with iEPCI 2.0 that is unique to our company, where we can give them first oil or first gas, up to a year earlier than the competition. So not only does that have a significant impact on their project returns upfront, but then they trust that we will actually deliver it. And that is what we have built. We have done it consistently, and we will continue to do it consistently. And they have grown to acknowledge that. They see that we have done things differently. We are a very different company than we had been, like others, traditionally. We use that period of time of five to eight years to really redesign, reshape, reengineer the entire company to where we are today. That being said, I will close by saying, again, we are respectful of our competition. We are humbled by the trust that our customers place in us, and we have a relentless focus to continue to drive further differentiation or maybe using your analogy to deepen and widen the moat every single day.

Great, that is awesome color. So one other thing that you flagged here today was this 20-year frame agreement with Chevron, I know that FTI has had frame agreements with major oil companies for periods of time. But clearly, you felt it was extremely important to highlight this one in particular. So is this - I guess, in your mind, do you think that this is a start of a trend where you are going to see more opportunities to have these extended frame agreements. Just to add a little more insight if you can on that, that would be great.

Sure. As you pointed out, we have a long history of deep and long relationships, many of which are exclusive with our company and have really built differentiation for us. We earn those every single day. But the reason specifically for calling out the Chevron frame agreement was because of the adoption of Subsea 2.0. So this is the first frame agreement with Chevron where they are going to the Subsea 2.0 configurable product family, which was a real highlight for us.

Okay, sounds great. Thanks Dough.

[Operator Instruction] Marc Bianchi with TD Cowen. Your line I open.

I wanted to ask a little bit more about the orders for this year. Now you have got this upgraded guidance of $9 billion. That leaves about $2.3 billion in the second half. How are you thinking about the unannounced and announced portions of this? By my math, it would seem to assume maybe a slightly lower unannounced piece and almost zero large awards. Is that the right way to be thinking about the outlook here?

Marc, I don't know that I would draw any - might be early to draw any strong determination of the mix. There will be more announced awards. I will certainly confirm that. Obviously the strong base from our subsea services and as you know, the continued level of unannounced awards. So I think what you saw in the second quarter was just a phenomenal and a phenomenal mix of announced awards in the second quarter, probably a bit higher in that mix, if you will, that you rightfully laid out. So if you kind of look at that recipe going forward, there will be more announced awards, but probably not to the same level as we saw in the second quarter, which was quite exceptional. Again, I think I just want to make sure the focus remains on the $25 billion. That is where our focus is. And our level of confidence has increased significantly in our ability to be able to achieve the $25 billion over, I guess, it would be what now the next 10 quarters or so.

And that was the final question. I will now turn the call back over to Matt Seinsheimer for final remarks.

This concludes our second quarter conference call. A replay of the call will be available on our website beginning at approximately 8:00 p.m. British Summer Time today. If you have any further questions, please feel free to reach out to the Investor Relations team. Thanks so much for joining us. Jack, you may end the call.

This concludes today's conference. We thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.