Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to the Fulton Financial First Quarter Results Conference Call. This call is being recorded. I will now like to turn the call over to Jason Weber, Senior Vice President and Director of Corporate Development. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you, Tracy. Good morning. Thanks for joining us for Fulton Financial's conference call and webcast to discuss our earnings for the first quarter of 2016. Your host for today’s conference call is Phil Wenger, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Fulton Financial Corporation. Joining Phil is Pat Barrett, Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Our comments today will refer to the financial information and related Slide presentation included with our earnings announcements, which we released at 4:30 yesterday afternoon. These documents can be found on our Web site at fulton.com by clicking on Investor Relations and then on News. The slides can also be found on the Presentations page under Investor Relations on our Web site. On this call, representatives of Fulton may make forward-looking statements with respect to Fulton’s financial condition, results of operations and business. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties, and other factors some of which are beyond Fulton’s control and difficult to predict and which could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in the forward-looking statements. Fulton undertakes no obligation, other than as required by law, to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. In our earnings release, we’ve included our Safe Harbor statement and forward-looking statements, we refer you to this section, and we incorporate into today’s presentation. For a more complete discussion of certain risks and uncertainties affecting Fulton, please see the sections entitled Risk Factors and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition, Results of Operations set forth in Fulton’s filings with the SEC. In discussing Fulton’s performance, representatives of Fulton may refer to non-GAAP financial measures. Please refer to the supplemental financial information included in the Fulton's earnings announcement released yesterday for a reconciliation of those non-GAAP financial measures to the most comparable GAAP measures. Now I’d like to turn the call over to your host, Phil Wenger.

Thanks, Jason and good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us. I have a few prepared remarks before our CFO; Pat Barrett, shares the details of our first quarter financial performance and discusses our 2016 outlook. When he concludes, we will open the phone lines for questions. Before we get into the details of the first quarter, I would like to provide an update on our BSA/AML enforcement actions. We believe we’ve made the investments necessary to comply with the requirements of the enforcement actions and we continue to work on improving execution in order to make our BSA/AML infrastructure sustainable in a manner that is consistent with regulatory expectations. Having said that, we are not certain over what time frame our regulators will lift the enforcement actions could be listed in 2016 is also quite likely that one or more of the enforcement actions will remain in place beyond 2016. While resolution of the BSA/AML enforcement actions remains a top priority for us, we continue to be focused on initiatives to move the organization forward. Specifically, we are focused on organically growing new organization, simplifying our corporate structure and enhancing our processes, while controlling cost to drive efficiency. As we move through 2016 and beyond, we look forward to telling you more about the changes we are making. At this time, I’d like to share some highlights from the first quarter. We reported diluted per share earnings of $0.22, which was flat linked quarter and year-over-year. However excluding security gains, pre-provision net revenue increased applications $5.1 million or 11.2% year-over-year. Our return on assets was 0.86% and our return on tangible equity was 10.07% for the quarter. Average loans increased 4.4% from the prior quarter, loan demand is two points softer than the first quarter, in addition line borrowers…

Thank you, Phil, and good morning to everyone on the call, unless I heard, otherwise quarterly comparisons with the fourth quarter of 2015, starting on Slide 4. Phil noted earnings per diluted share this quarter were $0.22 on net income of $38 million representing a slight decrease from prior quarter. Earnings per diluted share were unchanged from both the first and fourth quarters of 2015 reflecting the impact of share repurchases. First quarter earnings reflected an increase in net interest income and a decrease from the provision for credit losses partially offset by the effects of seasonality that resulted in lower fee income a slight increase in non-interest expenses. Moving to Slide 5, our net interest income improved by more than 4%, despite one less day in the quarter. This improvement was driven by a 4 basis point increase in net interest margin, and 1% increase in average earnings assets, primarily the result of $194 million increase in average loans. The yield on average earnings assets improved 5 basis points, outpacing the slight increase in the cost of average interest bearing liabilities. 5 basis point increase in earning asset yields was driven by higher yields on loans, largely reflecting the impact of the short term rate increase in December. Average interest bearing liabilities were up 1.7% due largely to $164 million increase in average short term borrowings. This change in funding mix to lower cost short term borrowings partially mitigated a 2 basis point increase in interest bearing deposit cost. Turning to credit on Slide 6, based on our valuation of all relevant credit quality factors, we recorded $1.5 million provision for credit losses in the first quarter, which is $1.2 million lower than the provision in the previous quarter. The allowance for loan and lease losses declined slightly as…

Thank you [Operator Instructions]. And we’ll go first to Preeti Dixit with J. P. Morgan.

Phil, just to follow up on the consent orders, could you give us some more color on what developments took place in the quarter, is it now easy to believe one or more enforcement actions could extend to 2017?

So, I think we had normal updates. I don’t think we can really comment that specifically on what happens with our regulators. So I am sorry I can’t give you more detail.

Okay. But is it the where maybe there is different regulatory expectations across various subsidiaries?

I think that could be one of the situations here.

Second, your thought on expenses, could you have what the seasonal FICO impact was this quarter? And as we look through the balance of the year to get to that low to mid-single digit growth, it sounds like expenses would be flat to ramping a bit higher from the $120 million this quarter? Is that the right way to think about it? Maybe you could give us some color on your expectations for the expense line?

Sure, we typically see you went from a $1 million to $2 million hit in the first quarter from the seasonal uptick in payroll taxes and I think your assumption is pretty reasonable.

Okay. Helpful. Then on the fees, obviously fourth quarter was a pretty strong result but you're keeping your mid to high single-digit growth expectations. Could you give us some color on where you're seeing the most opportunity to move the needle on the fee revenues?

Well, I would say as we go through the balance of the year we believe that mortgage, SBA loans and swap fees will be large contributors to our increase.

Okay. That's helpful. I'll step out for now. Thank you.

[Operator Instructions] And we'll go next to Matthew Breese with Piper Jaffray.

Hi, guys. This is Brody Preston on the call for Matt Breese.

Can you speak up please, I'm sorry can we have your name again.

This is Brody Preston on the call for Matt Breese. I saw you guys -- you said you repurchased $11 million. Could you give me the average price paid for that and the amount of shares?

It was 917,000 shares, so the average price would 11.9956 or $12.

Thank you. Do you guys have a near-term outlook for the margin in light of guidance for 2016 of a flat margin versus 2015, like next quarter or two?

You know there's so much near term volatility that can move it one or two basis points around things that are tough to predict like non-interest to be effective of non-accrual loans moving into and out of an interest recovery and loan fees and repayments. And we try to kind of just stick to a general range we still think that the zero to three basis point volatility on a quarterly basis resulting in potentially a pretty stable margin throughout the year is the right way to think about that. So you do the math, we could give back a little bit of the margin percentage improvement we saw this quarter it was about comes in at levels that we guided to. So Brody in addition to that I would say in quarters that we don't have a rate increase we still have some pressure on margin and the guidance that we gave we have essentially one more rate increase this year in that guidance. It's the early third quarter so if we hit that we could see the positive impact if we don't get that you could see negative fall off as we pass mid-year.

Great. Thank you. And one more for you guys. Does the current loan pipeline suggest that the mid to high single-digit loan growth is still achievable in 2016?

We believe that it is yes.

Okay, thank you very much.

And we'll go next to Bob Ramsey with FBR.

Hey, good morning, guys. Saw a nice improvement on the outside services and professional fees. I'm just curious if it's a good trajectory to expect through 2016 those items that continue to gradually drift lower? And then, I know you gave color on timing or the uncertainty around timing of getting the consent orders lifted. Just kind of curious, is there much of a direct tie between that and seeing some of these regulatory costs come down? Or are you guys making your investments and doing what needs to be done and there's not a direct link between the timing of expenses coming down and the consent order getting lifted?

So there were a number of things in there. You know I think a gradual reduction is a valid assumption, they could have some volatility till then. We will continue to spend whenever we need to on the BSA AML side and I think the guidance that we gave you assumes that. Remind you too that the BSA AML cost from an outside services and consulting perspective are a minority of what we spend in outside services and consulting so we've had a lot of activity going on, platform investment, whether it's IT or process or other and there's some impact from a processing perspective as well on that line volume.

Okay, fair enough. And then shifting gears to talk about provision, given more credits today, I know you guys have source that provisional be driven by loan growth. Is it fair to think that you apply something similar to the allowance to loan ratio today to net loan growth and that’s the way to think about what provision expense will be?

I think we’ve been guiding that the provision on a quarterly basis it will be in the range between 0 and $5 million, and I would continue to give that guidance. And say that in quarters, if we have a quarter where there is not much loan growth, it should be to the lower end of that guidance. And then the higher the loan growth is, the closer you would get to the higher end.

And we’ll go next to Joe Glaude with Merion Capital Group.

Just follow up a little bit on that last question from Bob, just in regards to asset quality and good trends there. And I think you alluded to it in the remarks. But just wondering what the trends were and such far and early stage delinquencies are there moving in the same direction as the MPLs or anything to notice there.

Yes, I would say that there was metrics move down more than some of the ones that we stated in the call.

And we’ll go next to Matt Schultheis with Boenning.

Couple of quick questions, it looks to me like in March you hired an SBA lender. And I was wondering if she came over with her whole team, or if that was a one-off? And if you anticipate or brining her whole team over?

So, it has been in the newspapers that we hired Lynn Ozer. And we hired in addition to her a number of SBA people and some are from her team and some were from other areas. But we have made a substantial investment into the SBA category.

Continues to going around that she's sort of in garden period with her former employer?

I don’t know that we can really comment on anything, we could…

Understood. With the positive growth in the quarter, was any of that tied to the quasi solving of the Pennsylvania budget in past where they freed up some state funds late in the year, and so there was some seasonal municipal flows that normally happened earlier in the year but all got jumped into the first quarter. Did you experienced some of that as well, or is that…

I would say the answer to that question is no. Right at the end of the quarter and we had the same curiosity about what impact it would have, but it ended up being nothing that was measurable.

And is that budget impasse affecting you guys in anyway besides those deposit flows, any concerns that your borrowers or your customers have, or some of your, even maybe your nonprofits regarding the environment in general.

I don’t -- we have not seen any impact on credit, we did put some short term financing packages in place for school districts and municipalities. But I would say that there really hasn’t been that much borrowing against them.

And we’ll go next to Frank Schiraldi with Sandler O'Neill.

Good morning. Just a couple of follow-ups on some things already been discussed. Just on the provisioning again, Phil, correct me if I'm wrong. I think in the past you've suggested the reserve to loan ratio will probably bottom out somewhere above the 1% level. Just wondering, am I remembering that right and is that still the thinking?

I would say it could still go a little lower, but it should bottom out above the 1%. But that will depend on a lot of metrics.

And then just on the mid to high single-digit loan growth for the year, is there a specific geography within the footprint that would be an outlier in terms of driving that growth? And as a follow-up to that, we've heard a lot about potential market dislocation in Southeast PA. Has that started to flow through into loan growth already or is that largely something we should see go forward?

So we are expecting loan growth in all our markets and I would say on the market disruption side, there is more of that happening in Pennsylvania and that started really in the second half of last year and we see it continuing this year.

Okay, thank you.

[Operator Instructions] And we'll go next to Michael Perito with Keefe, Bruyette & Woods.

Good morning. Couple quick questions. I jumped on the call a little late so I apologize if I missed this. First, on the share repurchase, I know you guys mentioned how much left you have on the authorization. Any comments on your outlook for the remainder of the year, given where the share prices moved up to and how you guys are thinking about incremental buybacks going forward?

We don't have a lot of comments, I will say, in factor, things that factor into that are how much growth we get because we do want to fund our growth first and the price has some impact.

Is this fair to assume that if you guys hit your growth guidance and this share price remains where it is, that you guys will have some level of activity in the buyback for the balance of the year?

I think that's a fair.

Thanks. And then the second question kind of more detailed question on the margin. It looks like in the savings and interest growing demand products that over the last, call it, four or five quarters, you guys have actually had some real modest but some slight pickup in pricing. Any thoughts on how you guys are thinking about your deposit pricing going into the rest of the year here? Is that something you expect to continue, or will it be relatively flat? Obviously, I know it depends on what the rates do, but any update there would be helpful.

We've got impact, we've got couple of things that we're, one is in fact the short term rate increases and we did see some impacts in the quarter from the 25 bip increase in December that rose to probably 20 to 25% of our demand deposit line, these would be index linked deposits that automatically reprice. And other than that it would be competitive pressure that would really cause rates to change and to date we really haven't seen much if any impact on competition for deposits in our markets.

So pricing competition still generally not there as it stands today?

Correct, yes.

Alright thanks guy, appreciate it.

Thank you.

It appears there are no further questions at this time, I'd like to turn the conference back to Phil Wenger for any additional or closing remarks.

Well thank you all for joining us today, we hope you will be able to be with us when we discuss second quarter results in July.