Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Liberty Media Corporation 2018 Q1 Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded today, May 9. I would now like to turn the conference over to Courtnee Chan, Senior Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you. Before we begin, we'd like to remind everyone that this call includes certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including statements about business strategies, market potential, new service and product launches, discussions involving IR communications, plans for the Battery Atlanta, matters relating to Formula One including future financial performance, expenses, brand expansion, including internationally, the launch of F1 TV Pro and other digital initiatives, new races, experience improvement, merchandizing, sponsorship, promotion and television and other matters that are not historical facts. These forward-looking involve statements involve many risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such statements, including without limitation, possible changes in market acceptance of new products or services, the ability of our businesses to attract and retain customers, competitive issues, regulatory issues, and the availability of capital on terms acceptable to Liberty Media. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this call and Liberty Media expressly disclaims any obligation or undertaking to disseminate any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect any change in Liberty Media's expectations with regard thereto or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based. On today's call, we will discuss certain non-GAAP financial measures, including adjusted OIBDA of Liberty Media and adjusted EBITDA of Sirius XM. The required definitions and reconciliations, Schedules 1, 2, 3 can be found at the end of the earnings press release issued today, which is available on our Web site. This call also may include certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 regarding Liberty TripAdvisor Holdings. These forward-looking statements involve many risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such statements. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this call and Liberty TripAdvisor Holdings expressly disclaims any obligation or undertaking to disseminate any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect any change in Liberty TripAdvisor Holdings' expectations with regard thereto or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based. Now I would like to introduce Greg Maffei, Liberty's President and CEO.

Thank you, Courtnee. Good morning to all of you. Today speaking on the call, we will also have Liberty CFO, Mark Carleton; and Formula One's Chairman and CEO, Chase Carey. We and other members of management team will be available to answer questions at the end of our prepared remarks. Also we will be available to answer questions on Liberty TripAdvisor. Starting with Liberty Sirius XM, during the quarter we initiated our repurchases of Liberty Sirius XM stock fueled by last quarter's exchangeable net debt offering, and we bought back a 100 million shares as of April 30th. We effectively bought the Sirius XM at a [indiscernible] price of $4.36 a share, which we consider pretty darn attractive. On iHeart, we own today about $660 million of bonds. And we remain interested in the company at the right price. Turning to Sirius XM itself, I know that they had very strong first quarter results, beating consensus pretty much across the board. Revenue was up 6% to $1.4 billion, self-pay net add subscribers were up 1.56 million. And our ownership, as of April 23rd, so the 70.6%, didn't increase that much during the quarter as zero purchases at Sirius XM as they described were somewhat slow due to the rising stock price, a high-quality problem. Looking at the Formula One group, we're off to an exciting start to the 2018 season. Through four races we've had three different drivers from three different teams win races. We continue to see more overtaking and more drama on the track. We are continuing our discussions as Chase will outline further with the teams on changes to the sport to build further excitement in the years ahead. The planned launch of our OTT product will be this weekend at the Barcelona Grand Prix. And we…

Thank you, Greg. On the financial side, at quarter end, Liberty Sirius XM Group had attributed cash and liquid investments of $579 million, excluding $79 million of cash held at Sirius XM. The value of the Sirius XM common stock held at Liberty Sirius XM, as of May 8, was $21 billion. And we're now just short of $1.15 billion in debt against these holdings, including our new exchangeable debentures. We increased our borrowing capacity under the Sirius XM margin loan for future investing and general corporate purposes, it was at $1 billion, we took it up to $1.35 billion, but no additional amounts were drawn. Formula One Group had attributed cash and liquid investments of $130 million excluding $140 million of cash at F1, Formula One Group holds public market securities with a market value of approximately $3.7 billion as of May 8, including the inner group interest in the Braves Group; the $2.3 billion of attributed debt excluding the debt at F1. Braves Group had attributed cash and liquid investments of $114 million. At quarter end, Liberty Sirius XM Group had an attributed principal amount of debt of $8 billion which includes $6.9 billion of debt at Sirius XM. Formula One Group had an attributed principal amount of debt of $5.4 billion which includes $3.1 billion of debt at F1 and the Braves Group had an attributed principal amount of debt of $603 million. F1's total net debt to covenant OIBDA ratio as defined in their credit facilities was approximately 6.8 times, as of March 31, which is down from the 7.1 times as of year-end. Our maximal allowable leverage ratio is 8.7 times. We hit a target of around five to six times OIBDA, and those leverage ratios are for the Formula One business, not for Formula One Group. Chase will talk a little bit more about what's going on at Formula One in a minute. In the press release we've included some Formula One Q1 pro forma financial information. As we talked about previously, these numbers could vary quarterly, and that can impact the comparability from year-to-year. This happened in the first quarter of '18 due to the total number of number of races this year, and our proportional recognition of revenue over the course of the year, as well as F2 revenue and costs. Ideally it's best to look at the business on an annual basis where you can. Additionally this year we adopted the new revenue recognition accounting standard relating to certain of our contracts. We expect the adoption of this standard will be neutral to our results on an annual basis. And with that, I'll turn it over to Mr. Chase Carey.

Thank you, Mark. We're four races into our 21-race 2018 season. And as Greg noted, it has been an exciting start to the year on the track, with three different drivers in three different teams winning races. We had the Barcelona this weekend to begin the European part of our schedule, with nine European events as well as our Montreal event between now and early September. It's also been a busy start to the year for our overall business as we continue to move forward on a wide range of key initiatives to build the long-term value of Formula One. On the motorsport side of our business we have advanced discussions with the teams on the long-term structure of the sport. The key areas of focus include the cost of running a team, revenue distribution, the next generation engine, the aerodynamics of the car, and simplification of rules and regulations. Our goal is to put in place a structure that makes the sport more exiting and compelling for fans and a healthier business for those in Formula One as well as potential new entrants. On the commercial side of our business we're moving forward with a wide range of initiatives in the digital front. This week we will launch our inaugural live Grand Prix over the top product called F1 TV Pro. This product is a work in progress, and we'll continue to add features like Formula Two, Formula Three, expanded data and archives. We're very excited to move forward with this important new dimension to our business. We also continue to improve our products. This summer, as part of our efforts to connect with fans, we'll re-launch the F1 app, called F1 Access. We will launch a new responsive web platform and build new ways to monetize that engagement.…

So, thank you Chase, and I want to thank everyone for joining us. With that, Operator we're ready to open up the questions?

[Operator Instructions] our first call will come from Bryan Kraft with Deutsche Bank. Please go ahead.

Hi, good morning. Thanks. I have a question on broadcast revenue. In the earnings release, you attributed a decline in broadcast revenue to having one more race in 2018 versus 2017. In order for the per race revenue to be down year-over-year that would mean, I think total of 2018 broadcast revenue growth is going to be less than 5%, I guess, I just want to see if that conclusion is correct, or if there's some other cause of the broadcast revenue decline that maybe wasn't mentioned in the press release? Thanks.

Chase, you want to take that or you want us to track?

I guess it's a little bit in the weeds and the percentages. So I'm not sure the math, I mean it is 21 versus 20. And I'm dynamic that factors into what gets recognized, but I guess by the way the math works out, I don't -- you know, I think essentially broadcast revenue is recognized largely across races. We have won more races this year. So it was 120, last year it's 121 this year, and I think what the math works out there.

I guess I'd also note these contracts are lumpy, so overall we do have some increases coming some of them take a while to kick in.

Is that, I mean Greg that and Chase to follow-up there, I mean are you saying that over the course of the season some of the renewals in 2018 will kick in and therefore we're not necessarily seeing a full per race run rate in the first quarter?

No, I think the lumpiness would be more annual than within -- we mostly renew contracts every year for the start of the season. So I think the lumpiness is more when are the annuals -- as you're trying to extrapolate annual increases, the lumpiness comes more from when our contracts being renewed year-to-year and not within a year.

Right. But as you know, Bryan, we're not here to give guidance on that. Thank you.

Understood. Okay, thanks.

Thank you. Our next question will come from Vijay Jayant with Evercore. Please go ahead.

Thanks. For Chase, obviously you are going through these negotiations for the 2021 Season, can you just help us understand I mean with all these various facets to these agreements, will all come up together, or will they'd be the World Motorsports Counsel on Indian specification versus GM economics and the like? Just trying to understand when will we have more sort of clarity on that. And if you could help us on how TV viewership for Formula 1 was through 1Q given the new feature, it would be very helpful. Thank you.

Sure. Yes, in terms about the timing of these discussions with the teams, I guess in general, we'd like to do sooner rather than later, I'm not going to give up deadline some aspects of it actually really won't have an effect till 2021 -- it doesn't mean we won't -- I think we are for planning purposes for everybody's sake I think we will look up obviously get it done much earlier. Their aspects of it that realistically have to be resolved much earlier, I guess outside the engine, the new engine that's being one in particular just the lead on of the R&D and the work in developing an engine really means that sort of neat stuff. Beyond of course midyear, these things are somewhat interrelated though, yes, clearly not all completely interrelated, but I think we have this as a priority. Our goal is to move forward as quickly as possible. We're engaged with all the teams both as a group and individually because it's difficult when you have too many at a room sometimes the conversation get circular. But I think we're actually making good progress on it, and certainly plan to try and address things as quickly as possible. But it may not have everything addressed in one big -- with one big ball wrapped around it because as I said, there are things that probably have longer lead times than others. So I think for the sake of planning and looking to the future, we've looked up get things resolved in the short-term not the long-term. TV viewership in the first four races is down a touch there mid -- down single-digits it's really driven -- the down is driven by two factors, really two countries; Italy, where we've moved platforms from probably being more free to a bit more -- to more paddy. So that's probably had the biggest impact. And Brazil is a country that without fully [indiscernible] racing, so he was our Brazilian driver has it impacted and leadership there. As for the majority of the countries -- and take the top 20 countries, the majority of those are up, but the impact in those two markets brings it sort of down mid single-digits.

All right, thanks so much.

Thank you. Our next question will come from David Karnovsky with JPMorgan. Please go ahead.

Thank you. Just a follow-up to that last question, Chase, can you just talk about what type of response you received from many fan that you have done also the sponsor partners typically fresh TV product that you put out?

It's actually great. You're never going to get 100%, people get used to things they've had for years. And so, I think we recognized it'll always be a degree of a mixed bag. But overall, the response to the wide range, I've just read an article an hour ago on the graphics packages, and some research that came back really positive on that, sort of particularly I guess it was on the newest feature where we've put them some data on top of the halo. But the general reaction to things I was talking about whether it's the graphics, the sound, the camera angles, the reaction to -- the season in general has been for us really encouraging. I think we feel good about the reception and the response we're getting, they are from fans and most of the research that we are doing.

Okay. And then, just regarding the potential Miami Grandprix, is there anything you've been working with the new race commodores or anything different about this partnership that you strive to structure relative to some of your legacy deals? Thanks.

So, every deal is unique, and you know, this deal is not going to be realistically -- you know, this is not a done deal yet, we have some steps to go through, but yes, each deal is unique, and I think we knew going into the US market, which is more like a developed market, you know, we're going to have unique aspects to it. But that would be true for other races we have in other places. I mean, everybody has seen these deals to be a sort of a one-note song, and realistically, you know, there are always a lot of moving parts around sponsorships and hospitality, and other components that go into it, different economics, industry races, the track. So, they are unique but not the structure that we think is one that gives us a really exciting race focus, fan proposition, and a business proposition. We think this really -- we believe it's going to happen and we hope it's going to happen. We think this race could probably be a real significant race for us on the schedule.

Thank you.

Thank you. We will now move to Barton Crockett with B. Riley FBR. Please go ahead with your question.

Hey, guys, this is [indiscernible] on for Barton. Thank you for taking my question. I have one for Chase and one for Gregg. For Chase, on F1 passing through, some of Ferrari's commentary, seems like you guys are making some good progress on the negotiations with them. Can you just give us a little bit more color on what you're seeing, where you're going with the teams, and kind of what is still a roadblock? And then, for Gregg, if you could provide us with an update on your discussions for the quarter and the 40% stake in iHeart, I know there is some of it that you're still exploring off the table for now and then, if you could provide any updates on the rationale for that investment, and if you got any new learnings? That would be great. Thank you.

I guess on the discussions, I don't want to say too much. I guess we've studied General in the past. I think these stakes of discussions, negotiations, what you want to call it, are best said in private and described -- done in private, not in public, and then explained when you get through it, and export, in recent years has been under-served by trying to negotiate things too often in public and portray things in public. So, I don't want to get into the weeds. Just what I would say is, realistically, I think we have broad based agreements on the basic -- I think everybody agrees on sort of the basic goals and the basic structures. I think the discussions therefore become more that compromise us in the specifics, as you go through it, as opposed to broad philosophical direction. So I think we -- I think there's agreement on the philosophical direction that we're putting forth. But clearly there are differing views as you get into the specifics that are involved in any one of those components.

That's great. Thank you.

And I've heard -- I think the process is evolving as they go through their Chapter 11 proceedings. Creditors are gaining an understanding of what they are proposing to buy. I think at some point they are going to re-engage with us, and if the price is attractive, as I said, we would be interested. And the rationale for that is there are both -- I think some opportunities around radio. They're still having interest toward radio, and are so interested in some of the assets that we have, including serious investment in Pandora. I think there are both synergies on the revenue side and on the cost side potentially. And iHeart is an attractive free cash flow generator. The wide pricing in combination with that is -- those are the factors and it will be additive to our music holdings.

Great, thank you very much guys.

Thank you. John Tinker with Gabelli has our next question. Please go ahead.

Hi, thank you. Just changing companies a minute. We have a lot of Braves. Could you just give us some idea as to what you might get from the sale of the residences? And are you thinking about selling more assets? And also, I know it's a very small state, but you still actually have a piece of Bamtech [ph]. Is there any value there or is it so small it doesn't matter?

Well, I think on the -- this is Mark Carleton on the residential side. We are going through a process and we certainly haven't gotten to the point that the process where we are talking about ranges of dollars, but certainly the areas, the ranges we've discussed are pretty lucrative. And I think in general, as we look at those projects down at the Battery, to the extent that we think it makes most sense to sell those off to our partners or others, we will certainly look at those if it's logical and lucrative. And so far, we are performing well above what our projections have been on lease up, and on revenue, and on activity down there. So it's going very well. But obviously, being able to maintain the look and feel of SunTrust Park and the entire Battery and the experience for fans is key. But we will -- we will be opportunistic as some of these projects get closer to completion and get fully onto them.

If I might just add a little -- we think the Battery combined with the Braves is a unique live experience. Our strength comes from developing interesting opportunities around that including residential, including office, including the live nation music centers, that music environment we have there, all of those things. But we don't really necessarily see ourselves as long-term holders of real estate assets. We see ourselves as people developing interesting opportunities.

And Bamtech, because you still seem to be spending a lot of money, and I think there's still a lot of small pieces at the backend.

Yes, I think that's really being driven at the board level of MLB and we're curtailing that. We did receive, as you know, capital RD from that. I think we are very happy with the price that Disney paid us for that asset, and we are enthusiastic to receive the backend. I don't think it's been disclosed how much the value of that is going to be yet.

Correct.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question will come from Brandon Ross with BTIG. Please go ahead.

Hi. Thanks for taking the questions. Two: first, NASCAR appears to be for sale, just curious Greg and Chase to get your thoughts on that asset, and then on the Liberty Sirius discount. You bought back what, a $100 million over the last three months, but the spread continues to widen. What's the path from here? How do you think you are going to effect change in that spread? And I guess, related is if Siri was willing to do in the RMT, would you be open to that at this point, or do you see an eventual GCI-type franchise in there? Just like to know your thoughts. Thanks.

Chase, you want to go first on NASCAR?

Yes. I guess first and foremost, I'm focused on priority one, for our Sirius is really getting Formula 1 to where we think it can and it should be in the over the next couple of years. So, we are not trying to put blinders on, but I think we have -- we feel we have an opportunity to take this business to another level and you know if that is what's driving it -- and NASCAR is a fairly different franchise for us. If you look at the fan base, the regionalization of it is in the US, not even broad-based to US, US sport -- I don't -- I think people -- we've all raced cars. I'm not sure beyond that if there's a lot that sort of would really make it a natural fit for us. It would certainly give a scale in the US, and we could use that scale to build, but I think there are probably more differences than similarities in that and I think for us, our priority is really making Formula 1 everything it can be, and focusing on things that would really strengthen Formula 1, and get a unique way. Liberty may have a different perspective. They acquire more businesses than we do. As I said, I'm only worrying about one business which is Formula 1, and I think there're limits to what degree that fits in a way that would really make one plus one is free, and it -- we probably might take on it, although the guys sometimes look at more businesses than we do so maybe have different view.

But we are largely integrated with Chase, I think it's not as clear what the synergies are between the two assets and I would know, the trends have not been perfect in NASCAR unless we had a good thesis on how and why we can fix them, it's not an obvious to us. On the second point about the discount, we are taking advantage that I know we bought back the stock, I would expect that we will buyback more stock and we will continue to take advantage of the market once we give us out of the discount. Is there a GCI transaction or RMT out there maybe but I don't see that as - there is a silver ball I need that there is a - we do think that we think are logical instead and if the market wants to give us the stock at discount we are going to continue to buy it back and take advantage of it, you may know that Sirius bought less back of their own and we bought more back here to speak to something about what is the combination of their stock price in our discount, so we will see.

Thank you.

Thank you. Our final question today will come from Jason Bazinet with Citi. Please go ahead, sir.

Sorry question for Mr. Maffei. I'm asking you a question that's really one that I should be able to answer but I can't, do you have a hypothesis in terms of why the sort of customary, the produciary discount became uncustomary this year?

I think -- Jason, thank you. We talked about some of them in the past relating to general of the supplier where, there is now currently a far larger market cap at Liberty Sirius and there is a Sirius, Sirius has a been a far larger consumer of its own stock than we have of Liberty Sirius. My understanding is that there have been a number of other type situations where hedge funds have not had success and had to blowout their positions including potentially this one, which may have widen the spread, the fear that we might utilize Liberty Sirius XM currency to overpay for and dilute ourselves by purchasing SXM stock. All of those I think are potential factors you could have point to and why it has widened is probably the number three guidance. I think one joined up point out there is no borrow on the Sirius, which is another thing exacerbating some of the internal mechanics around, why people are not having that discount. But when I noticed the grey people want to give us that stock at a discount. We are likely to continue to take advantage of it and we've been sometimes collaborating and finding way to take advantage of it in better ways like in GCI transaction.

Do you think the potential purchase of iHeart as part of it? Now that if you are going from a track or discount to tracker plus complexity pro forma?

That's a decent thesis, I think you should - that wouldn't be just with us. I think however that ends up; it is not like we are going to do an iHeart transaction apart from Sirius. We bought it that because that's something we do probably with more efficiency and more regulatory than Siri. But all of our actions there are fully coordinated with Sirius; it would not be like we are going to do this thing on a same level basis.

Thank you very much.

That's the last question for the day. Thank you all for joining us. We look forward to speaking with you next quarter if not sooner.

All right. Take care.

Thanks, Chase.