Good afternoon, everyone. Welcome to Forward Air's Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2025 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to turn the call over to Mr. Tony Carreno, Senior Vice President of Treasury and Investor Relations. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you, operator, and good afternoon, everyone. Welcome to Forward Air's Fourth Quarter and Year-End 2025 Earnings Conference Call. With us this afternoon are Shawn Stewart, President and Chief Executive Officer; and Jamie Pierson, Chief Financial Officer. By now, you should have received the press release announcing Forward Air's fourth quarter 2025 results, which was also furnished to the SEC on Form 8-K. We have also furnished a slide presentation outlining fourth quarter 2025 earnings highlights and a business update. Both the press release and slide presentation for this call are accessible on the Investor Relations section of Forward Air's website at forwardair.com. Please be aware that certain statements in the company's earnings release announcement and on this conference call may be considered forward-looking statements. This includes statements which are based on expectations, intentions and projections regarding the company's future performance, anticipated events or trends and other matters that are not historical facts, including statements regarding our fiscal year 2026. These statements are not a guarantee of future performance and are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. For additional information concerning these risks and factors, please refer to our filings with the SEC and the press release and slide presentation relating to this earnings call. Listeners are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this call. The company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, unless required by law. During the call, there may also be a discussion of financial metrics that do not conform to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles or GAAP. Management uses non-GAAP measures internally to understand, manage and evaluate our business and make operating decisions. Definitions and reconciliations of these non-GAAP measures to their most directly comparable GAAP measures are included in today's press release and slide presentation. I will now turn the call over to Shawn.

Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us. I really appreciate your interest in Forward Air Corporation. There are 3 main topics that I would like to cover on today's call. First, I will provide an update on our strategic alternatives review process. Second, I will review some key achievements in 2025. Third, I will share some thoughts on our 2026 priorities before turning the call over to Jamie. Regarding the strategic review, we have continued to make progress since our last update in November and believe we are nearing the conclusion. As we have said from the onset, this has been an extremely comprehensive review in an incredibly difficult logistics environment and broader economic backdrop, which has contributed to the length of the process. When we have updates to share on the review, we will. Beyond that, we are going to remain focused on operating the company, preparing for the cycle to turn so we can take advantage of when it does and keep today's comments focused on the actual results. With that, let's turn to the second topic. For the full year 2025, we reported consolidated EBITDA, which is calculated pursuant to our credit agreement of $307 million compared to $311 million in 2024. As we mentioned last year, we expected the quality of our earnings to continue to improve as historical pro forma and synergy savings roll off, and that is exactly what has happened. To that point, adjusted EBITDA in 2025 improved $40 million year-over-year to $293 million compared to $253 million in 2024. I am proud of our team for holding serve and focusing on what we can control and delivering these results while actively transforming the company and in the face of a multiyear freight recession. We remain focused on the customer and…

Thanks, Shawn, and good afternoon, everyone. For the fourth quarter of 2025, we reported another solid $75 million consolidated EBITDA quarter. Actually, to be very specific, it was a $77 million quarter, and that is compared to $72 million in the fourth quarter a year ago. As you heard from Shawn, for the full year, consolidated EBITDA was $307 million, which was in line with the $311 million for 2024. As usual, we have detailed the information used to reconcile the adjusted and consolidated EBITDA results on Slide 31 of the presentation. And before you ask, should I note that you will, in the fourth quarter, our operating expenses were negatively impacted by a $20 million charge for the impairment of software implementation costs. Being a noncash charge, as you would expect, the credit agreement allows us to add these costs back. Regarding consolidated EBITDA for the prior 3 quarters, we've adjusted the previously reported amounts by the actions we took in the fourth quarter to improve our cost structure. If you will remember, the credit agreement also allows us to add back pro forma savings from these actions to be included in our historical consolidated EBITDA and requires that we spread back in time to the period in which the expense would have been incurred. As such, we have appropriately adjusted the prior quarters to reflect the impacts of the cost savings. If you would, please reference Page 12 of the slide presentation issued today, and you will be able to see what we reported in the past and updated for the most recent cost out and pro forma actions. Turning to the segments. Expedited Freight fourth quarter reported EBITDA improved to $25 million compared to $18 million a year ago. We also saw a significant improvement in year-over-year…

Thank you, Jamie. In closing, we finished the year with momentum despite economic headwinds and a significant ongoing organizational transformation. Performing under these conditions underscore the resilience of our business and the strength of our team. I am incredibly proud of their unwavering commitment to our customers and their disciplined execution. Their ability to operate with precision while maintaining rigorous cost control has meaningfully strengthened our performance and enhanced our flexibility. This focus has not only delivered results in a challenging environment, but also positioned us well to capture opportunities as the market conditions improve. I am highly confident in the foundation we are building. We are entering the next phase of the business from a position of strength, well equipped to drive sustainable long-term growth and to continue delivering meaningful, measurable value to our shareholders. We believe we are well positioned to benefit as freight markets stabilize and recover. As we move into Q&A, we ask that the questions focus on the state of the industry and the business. Thank you in advance. I will now turn the call over to the operator to take questions. Operator?

[Operator Instructions] We'll go first today to Bruce Chan with Stifel.

Congrats on all the progress that you've seen so far. Maybe just to start here, it's been a while since we've had an up cycle, and you've obviously had a lot of change to the Expedited Freight segment since then. So -- maybe you can just remind us of how your model performs in a recovery scenario, especially if there's a big truckload supply element as you talked about, Jamie. Just trying to get a sense here of how we should be thinking about maybe gross margin squeeze in expedited and then in brokerage versus truckload and maybe where you're at in terms of third-party PC linehaul miles.

Bruce has about 5 questions in one sentence. So let me...

It's good to hear from you, Bruce.

Yes. Let me see if I can start from the top down. So in terms of how we perform in, I guess, a squeezed environment, I would say if you go back and look at the last probably 5, maybe going on 6 or 7 years, we outperformed the space given the flexibility of our operating model. And I say this because we are fixed in the terminal side and incredibly variable on the PT, which is one of your questions. So we can add capacity that being defined by drivers, tractors and trailers, probably faster than just about anybody in the space. So if I went back and looked at it on a quarterly, maybe even an annual basis, we might positively comp to the industry average EBITDA margin, but not by much. We don't. So -- but there is a time of volatility to where, at least on the ground side, we will probably outperform. Now that isn't the same thing about warehouse, which is probably pretty flat, air and ocean, which is given today's announcement, anybody's guess. But I think that given where we are right now at 10% EBITDA margins relative to the industry's 20%, I would suspect that we would make up a lot of that ground. That was a terrible witty in a lot of that ground. It was a double entendre. It was not intended.

That's a good one. Okay. That's super helpful. And maybe for my, I guess, second or sixth question here. Omni, obviously performing a lot better than expected. Can you maybe just help us to get a sense of what an appropriate midterm margin should look like there and what seasonality should look like there?

Yes. So Bruce, as you know, it's a pretty diverse portfolio. So when you look at whether it be obviously ground feeding into the network or the contract logistics, air and ocean customs brokerage. So it's really our focused growth in all of those areas and really play into the advantages of that diversification so that when one is up or one is down, the other one is up, et cetera. So that's really what we've seen in the success of 2025 and what we really intend to continue to push through 2026 and beyond. We've got the right leadership with the right experience, with the right focus in each one of those areas moving forward. And the other complement, I would say, is, I call it synergy selling, but it's looking at customers that have a wallet share in one of those areas, but not in the others. And we have a very robust team focused on that wallet share across the product offerings to continue to have the organic growth and further diversifying customer portfolios across those offerings. So that's really what's happening here within the Omni area.

Okay. But there's nothing in customs brokerage or bonded warehousing or something that should lead us to believe that you were over earning in this period or something like that?

No, not significantly. I mean, obviously, yes, duty drawback on the customs brokerage side is huge right now with all the tariff stuff, but it's not significant revenue streams. It's just an uptick. But no, nothing in particular to your point, other than just growth and organic growth across the portfolio of those customers.

Yes. If you look at the earnings presentation, Bruce, you'll see our margins in the Omni segment are pretty strong. So what Shawn said about growth, it couldn't be more spot on...

We go next now to Stephanie Moore with Jefferies.

I appreciate all the color and appreciate maybe the commentary you provided on the state of the underlying market as the year has progressed thus far. So maybe it would be helpful for -- if you could provide any additional commentary in terms of what your customers are saying, especially with this most recent ISM print inflecting positive for the first time in a long time. I mean customers actually founding more upbeat and any differentiation you can make amongst whether it's the LTL or Omni customers or the likes would also be helpful.

I think, Stephanie, from me, and I'll let Jamie chime in here. I think from our customers' experience with us, on a consistent basis has given them comfort whether you're talking about the legacy Forward Air freight forwarder 3PLs. We've been very consistent with them and very active and transparent with them. And then the consistency on the omni side of our solutioning and cross-functional service offerings over the last 2 years with all the changes we made. And to me, it's no differently than any of us when we are buying the service, we want to go to the best and very consistent, and that will keep us coming back for more. And that's really our recipe that's working for us. And so no real secret other than that. That's what we're seeing.

Yes. I'd say is, and I think I said it in my comments, looking at the ISM print and especially focus on new orders, I think everyone gets super excited about seeing the new orders pop. But if you look at it, I mean, there's been 3 months over the last 36 that it's been even marginally positive over 50. And the most recent print of obviously, doesn't make a trend. We're going to need to see a consistent trend, at least a report over 50 for at least 2, if not 3 or more months to see that, that's sustainable, and it's not an aberration in the actual results.

Absolutely. I think that's helpful. And then maybe sticking with Omni, I think the performance, as you noted, and we could all see, has been very strong. Do you find that this is more so a function of your own kind of company-specific actions -- and/or do you think that you're seeing some green shoots within the underlying market? Maybe just any kind of parsing out of that there as well. And then my third question, just to throw it out there and then I'm done, I promise, would be, do you think you're starting to see any of the synergies of kind of offering the two services starting to form in 2026?

I wouldn't say any green shoots other than our commercial organization has been rebuilt by Eric Brandt. I would say we've got our swagger back. We've got a detailed focus. We know what we want to do and how we perform well, and we know what we're not, and we're not going to offer that -- those offerings. So we're staying really laser-focused on selling solutions that are in our wheelhouse -- and I would say we're really not offering the two. The two are really one. And although we have an indirect and a direct channel on the sales side, but operationally and what I mentioned in my openings around -- on ground, that is the legacy Forward network. Everything in ground on the omni side has rolled over into the legacy Forward side, if you will. And I don't even like to use the legacy this or legacy that. But for this call, we will. But we just talk about really focused on the customer experience with our assets and solutions holistically, but always respecting the sales channels and making sure we don't have conflicts.

We'll go next now to Scott Group with Wolfe Research.

So I know you don't want to say too much on the process. I just want to make sure we're getting the message right. I think last quarter, you said it's taking a while and there's maybe a churn of interested parties, maybe less interest from some and new interest from others, if I understand what you were trying to say last quarter. Maybe just an update on that. Are we still seeing that churn? Or is there some other reason why this is taking so long?

Yes, Scott, I can't say any more than I said. But we're -- I feel confident that we are coming to a conclusion here and more to come as that rounds itself out.

I guess we're now -- Jamie, your comment, we're getting more optimistic since the year started. I guess we're about 2/3 of the way through Q1 now. Can you give us some update on sort of what you're seeing in the business? Like LTL tonnage, I think, was down 10%, 11% per day in Q4. What are you seeing in January, February?

Yes. Scott, we don't give guidance on that. And I always appreciate you asking at least there's one consistency amongst the calls. But what I would say is it's probably just normal seasonality. We're not going to comment on change in tonnage or price at this point in time. But if you just look over the last probably 2 years, it's probably not that much different in the first quarter than what you would have anticipated.

Okay. Maybe I'll ask one more, maybe we can maybe get an answer here. Give us some puts and takes on cash flow for this year, how you think -- what's -- how should we think about CapEx? And then I think the leverage covenant starts to get a little bit tougher each quarter this year. Just any thoughts on where you think you'll end the year on -- or how you're thinking about progress on deleveraging this year?

Yes. So what's great about 2025, Scott, is we reached that inflection point. So if you look at the statement of cash flow when we filed the K, you're going to see that we spent about $166 million in interest, another $25 million plus or minus in financing leases and another is $27 million in CapEx. So once we reach that inflection point, every incremental dollar over that amount actually starts to fall straight to the bottom line in terms of cash. So we reached that point in '25. We generated -- I know it sounds like small, but it's not the fact that it's only $1 million in increase in cash from '24 to '25. It's the fact that we dug out one hell of a hole in '24 to actually accomplish that in '25. So we're going to continue to focus on improving or increasing sales while actually holding the operating leverage that the team has built over the last 18 months.

So -- but similar in terms of CapEx and all that for this year?

Yes, we might have a little bit more in CapEx. But as a percent of revenue, I don't see it's going to be that demonstrably different than the past.

We'll go next now to Harrison Bauer with Susquehanna.

You emphasized the importance of volume driving incremental margins this year in your expedited business. It sounds like you view volume as having a higher profit contribution rather than your price cost outlook for 2026. Can you maybe speak to the directional outlook, particularly within Expedited Freight for pricing this year as you begin to lap prior pricing actions? As weight per shipment improves, would you expect any mix-related pressure on net yields?

Again, Harrison, probably 3 different questions in there. But I think what you're getting at is incremental shipments and having a disproportionate positive contribution, if I'm following that correctly. Is that right?

Yes, you got it. And just generally, what pricing within that business, what you expect if you expect volumes to be the bigger contributor to incrementals?

Yes. Well, right now, we're focused more about increasing and improving the density of the network and the falling profitability margin that comes out of it. And I say that as everybody knows on this call, including you, that there is a trade-off between price and volume. And given the decrease in tonnage that we've seen over the last 1 or 2 years, we've created excess capacity within the ground network. And with all the cost-out actions, all the synergies, all the closings of the facilities and the headcount rationalization, we have created an incredibly strong model with operating leverage, whereby all else being equal, assuming price is the same, if you drop in one incremental shipment into the network, it is much more profitable than the previous shipment. So we've got probably -- it's hard to say because capacity is defined by the lowest common denominator of 4 or 5 different metrics, whether it be terminals, doors, drivers, tractors, trailers, but you add one more shipment on that trailer that's already dispatched. You've already incurred the cost for it, it's going to be much more accretive than the prior shipment, again, all else being equal. And obviously, if price takes off, then that's free margin for all intents and purposes. Shawn, anything to add to that?

And then maybe just a follow-up along the -- sticking with pricing. In Intermodal in your drayage business, can you maybe help us understand the driver behind the notable change in the revenue per shipment this quarter and that inflected negative pretty different from the recent trends that you had in that business?

Yes. This one is an easy one, Harrison. I think this is a simple supply and demand. The port volumes are down somewhere between 5% to 10%. And it's not like the ground or the LTL network. It's much more, I guess, volatile in terms of the supply falling off, which is to say that it's much more elastic pricing in intermodal than it is probably in the linehaul business.

I would say, Harrison, there's two major revenue streams there. We have quite a few storage depots in country. And so you have the dray move lesser to the intermodal over the rail and your other major revenue stream outside of just normal port drayage or rail drayage is the storage of the container in our depot yard. So it just depends on what that mix is per quarter. And I would say that also helped us with the slowdown of the port drayage in Q4. We had some decent revenues on the storage side. So that's what supports the margin as well.

We'll take a follow-up question now from Bruce Chan at Stifel.

Yes. I appreciate the follow-up, guys. Looking through the deck, I'm reminded that you have some nice data center exposure in contract logistics through one of the legacy Omni OpCos. Can you just maybe give us a sense of what that looks like as a percent of revenue and maybe what growth has looked like there recently?

I think one of the slides depicts the percentage...

Yes, it shows -- hold on one second, Bruce. If you look at Page 7, -- it breaks up what we're -- when Shawn said, hey, we're going to be cutting the scene in terms of our products. We've updated this slide to show the percentage of the revenue in terms of the total for the entire fiscal year of 2025. So you'll see that contract logistics is about 15%, but that's global.

But, Bruce, the major concentration is in North America and Asia Pacific. So that's the majority where of our contract logistics revenue come from.

Okay. So fair to assume there's a good chunk of that data center and high-tech exposure in there?

Say it again, Bruce?

So fair to assume that there's a good chunk of data center and high-tech exposure in there?

It's in there, but I wouldn't say it is a good portion of our business, obviously, but it's not the only thing in there. You're going to see textiles in there. You're going to see tech outside of data center. You're going to see some automotive. So it's -- I would say it's not just in that area.

Yes. And I know you haven't had a chance to read it yet, Bruce. But we've been talking about under that vertical being tech, data, medical and then kind of a complex, high-value end market.

Okay. Great. And then what does the growth look like in that data center business? Has that been scaling with all the activity that we've been seeing in that space?

Yes, for sure. I mean we're scaling with it. There's a lot of players in the space, but we're there, and we're taking every wallet share we can grab. We're pretty good at it. And with the high-value, high-risk area of this business, going from our world-class warehouses on the contract logistics side into our trucks, into the clean rooms of the data centers, we're very good at the service, and we continue to gain momentum here.

And gentlemen, it appears we have no further questions today. Mr. Stewart, I'd like to turn things back to you, sir, for any closing comments.

All right. Well, thank you so much, and we really appreciate your interest and your support of us. It was a great year, and we remain extremely confident in our strategy and look forward to updating you on our progress next quarter if something happens between then. So I appreciate the time today. And if you have any follow-up questions, please reach out to Tony, and we'll be in touch. Thank you. Have a great week.

Thank you, gentlemen. Again, ladies and gentlemen, this concludes Forward Air's Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2025 Earnings Conference Call. Please disconnect your line at this time, and have a wonderful day. Goodbye.