David A. R. Dullum
Analyst · Jefferies
Well, thank you, David, and good morning all. As we get into the main part of the review of the quarter, I would like to quickly refresh our memories on what it is we actually do here. And of course the business of Gladstone Investment is to provide capital for businesses that are being purchased with a management team and other equity investors. These are usually companies with annual sales generally between about $20 million and $100 million, which is what we describe as the lower middle market.
We provide subordinated debt and equity and occasionally we do some senior debt if it helps the transaction. This combination of debt and equity produces a mix of assets which is the key really to our strategy. Our debt investments, they provide the income to grow our dividends while we expect the equity that we invest in to appreciate and build the shareholder value over the longer term. At September 30, 2012, quarter just ended, and based on their actual costs, our investments consisted of a mix of approximately $221 million or roughly 70% in debt investments and these produce income and about $96 million or approximately 30% in the equity securities portion and this is where we expect to produce capital gains overtime.
This ratio of 70:30 is slightly higher, frankly, in the equity proportion and we would like to have as our goal of roughly 80% debt, 20% equity. But this happens for a number reasons, in some cases the ratio is affected if we have loan payoffs relative to equity or if we in certain cases, which we do occasionally, have to convert a loan to equity in a particular company. Also, obviously, if we like the equity in a transaction, we will tend to do a little higher proportion of equity in a transaction. Always keeping in mind, though, what our expectation is on the current cash pay for the portfolio in general.
In the most recent quarter, our total interest bearing debt portfolio had a 12.5% cash yield, which is actually up from about 12.2% from the prior year’s quarter. The interest bearing debt is our primary source of cash to pay our dividend. Additionally, we often have success fees as a component of our debt instrument. Now success fees, these are contractually due upon the sale of a portfolio company, although the portfolio company can pay early at its option. So we recognize these success fees as income only when we receive the cash.
During our most recent quarter, we received cash and reported success fee income of $400,000. Further, as of September 30, 2012, approximately 76% of our interest bearing debt has these success fees due, with an average contractual rate accruing at about 3.2% per annum on all of the outstanding debt. So it’s pretty decent rate of return. In total, on all debt securities, this has created success fees owed to us of approximately $11 million, which is today about $0.50 a share.
Now we do not have these success fees recorded on our balance sheet though we do report them in the written part of our report to shareholders. Please know though that there is no guarantee that we will be able to collect all of the success fees owed to us. Now while the equity securities we own is not producing current cash income, we do expect that these equities to appreciate and add to the shareholder value. Since mid-2010 for instance, we have realized capital gains of about $29.3 million and this is through the stock ownership in various portfolio companies.
So as our portfolio builds, our goals continue to be to increase the interest income and the payout to dividends and also to seek asset appreciation through growth and equity value of the stocks of course that we own. Now, how do we do all this? Well, deal origination. Generally, we obtain our investment opportunities by partnering with management teams, private equity firms and other sponsors of buyouts. So our combination of debt and equity gives us, we believe, a competitive advantage in this area, in that it provides 2 very important portions on the capital structure in a buyout transaction.
In addition, we may find opportunities to provide capital which support a business owner who is not really seeking to sell the company outright, but wishes to sell a portion of his company or her company, while financing continued growth. Now in this case we will invest in debt and equity in exchange for a significant ownership in that particular business. Interestingly in July, the SEC approved an exemptive order that we had applied for a while ago, that expands our ability to co-invest with our sister BDC, Gladstone Capital Corporation. Now this provides origination opportunities on a broader range of companies and actually flexibility to invest in some larger companies while at the same time keeping our investment amount in a single portfolio company within the regulatory guidelines of each individual business development company, meaning Gladstone Capital and Gladstone Investment.
To date, we have made none of these co-investments. In September 2012, our board of directors approved limited revisions to our investment objectives and strategies, which will go into effect on January 1, 2013. All of our current portfolio investments, just so you know it’s -- do fit within the scope of our revised objectives and strategies and no changes will need to be made to the current portfolio as a result of this revision. What sort of the activity did we have for the quarter?
Well, we added 2 new buyouts to our portfolio. We invested $22.5 million in a company called Ginsey Holdings. This is a company which designs and markets a broad line of branded juvenile and adult bathroom products, although they are expanding into other parts of the house, if you will. We also invested $21.3 million in a company called Drew Foam Companies, which is a foam molder and fabricator for packaging some aspects of construction and insulated shipping container applications. We also invested about $6.7 million in 6 of our existing portfolio companies and we actually received back repayments of approximately $14.2 million.
After the quarter-end, we invested about $0.5 million additionally, and received principal repayments of approximately $1.6 million, again from couple of our existing portfolio companies. The result of all of this is that at the end of the quarter, we had $317 million invested in portfolio companies at cost. We maintained our dividend to stockholders for the quarter ended September 30 of $0.05 per share per month. And our board has also declared a dividend of $0.05 per share per month through December of this year. So we certainly hope to continue to make favorable dividend payouts for the foreseeable future.
In updating the actual portfolio itself, in general the companies are performing well, not without challenges, however. And this is why we do work very diligently through our investment management approach, which as I have mentioned in the past, is to limit losses, increase our equity value and preserve the cash flow from our portfolio companies. The things we do for this are, such as we do some strategic and business planning, elsewhere we work with outside resources assisting the portfolio of companies in continuing to review their competitive position and talent among other key business metrics. So we need to be proactive there.
When necessary, we provide operating management support and here we are able to tap experienced operating management talent from our staff or from a pool of talent that we have cultivated over the years. These folks help the portfolio companies streamline operations and evaluate add-on acquisitions as may come up. Also, we have mentioned this before, it’s really an interesting tool in that we conduct conferences for the CEOs of our portfolios companies. These conferences facilitate interaction between the portfolio companies management teams so they can exchange ideas such as best practices in purchasing, pricing, organization, health and manufacturing disciplines. We believe these activities are really important as a competitive strength to the total portfolio and that we have had very good results and by [ph] in fact from the CEOs of our portfolio of companies and we expect to continue doing this.
Now the result of all these efforts is really reflected in really turnaround performances of 2 of our portfolio companies that we had briefly mentioned in the past. One is Galaxy Tools and the other is a company called CCE. Now, in case of Galaxy, we restructured in July of 2010. We actually converted about $12.3 million of our total debt investment into preferred equity, and as a result of all that we actually experienced cumulative unrealized depreciation of about $19.4 million through June 30, 2012. Along the way we made some executive management changes. We facilitated strategic planning. And these have resulted in significant growth, cost savings, and now positive earnings. Therefore, these efforts are beginning to really be reflected in the value of the company and we have seen $5.8 million in unrealized appreciation during the quarter. So we are headed in the right direction and the prospect is very good.
For CCE, we restructured that in October of 2011, where we converted $4 million of our debt in to preferred equity, replaced the remaining debt investment on a non-accrual status, and as a result of all that we experienced cumulative unrealized depreciation of approximately $11.7 million through March of 2012. Now as with Galaxy, we made some changes here and we implemented these and these have resulted again in positive earnings. Now being reflected in the company's unrealized appreciation over the last 2 quarters of $6.9 million. Additionally, CCE is again making its interest payments to us and now we expect to have them back on accrual status for the quarter ending December 30, 2012.
So Galaxy and CCE are really good examples of this philosophy we talk about and the dedication to get our investments operationally sound, preserve shareholder capital versus say walking away from an investment because things are not going well. And therefore our companies, when they get difficult, we stick with our companies. We still have work to do though, with companies such as ASH, which is the one that’s still on non-accrual, though in general we believe our overall portfolio is really well balanced at this point.
How is our marketplace for transactions? Well, flow of opportunities for buyouts, we believe it continues to be very good both in terms of quality and quantity. The general economic conditions of course still continue to create uncertainty, and we continue to see improved stability in the middle market companies returning to profitability in some cases. So this improvement is causing an increase in the supply of quality businesses that are for sale, as certainly owners are taking advantage of these positive results. Senior bank financing is also becoming available and pretty reasonable price which accommodates the leverage in any particular transaction.
So as a result we are finding good opportunities where the valuations that we look at and the way in which we look at companies relative to what's called EBITDA or the operating cash flow, we can pay around 5x to 6.5x for these companies. There are certainly higher valuations out there and we try to tend to avoid these. So what's in our pipeline? Well, it keeps growing. We have stepped up our marketing and our deal-generating activity. We do stress our competitive advantage I mentioned earlier, where we are able to provide the subordinated debt and the equity in combination to help a transaction get completed.
However, we do continue to be cautious about the economy and we are diligent in pursuit of new investments. We do believe that our marketing efforts and the presence in the marketplace should allow us to continue on this growth trend with additional new investments over the next year. So the outlook and our goal for the fund is to maximize our distribution shareholders while achieving solid growth in both equity values and assets in the portfolio through these proprietary investments in the lower middle market company buyout arena.
And with that, I will turn it back over to David Gladstone.