Hello, everyone, and welcome to GBDC's Earnings Call for the Fiscal Year and Quarter Ended September 30, 2023. Before we begin, I'd like to take a moment to remind our listeners that remarks made during this call may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Statements other than statements of historical facts made during this call may constitute forward-looking statements and are not guarantees of future performance or results and involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors, including those described from time-to-time in GBDC's SEC filings. For materials we intend to refer to on today's earnings call, please visit the Investor Resources tab on the homepage of our website, which is www.golubcapitalbdc.com, and click on the Events Presentations link. Our earnings release is also available on our website in the Investor Resources section. As a reminder, this call is being recorded. With that, I'm pleased to turn the call over to David Golub, Chief Executive Officer of GBDC.

Hello, everybody, and thanks for joining us today. I'm joined today by Chris Ericson, our Chief Financial Officer; and by Matt Benton, our Chief Operating Officer. For those of you who are new to GBDC, let me start with a quick recap on our investment strategy. Our investment strategy is and since inception, it has been, to focus on providing first-lien senior secured loans to healthy, resilient middle market companies, generally companies that are backed by strong partnership oriented private equity sponsors. Yesterday, we issued our earnings press release for the quarter and fiscal year ended September 30 and we posted an earnings presentation on our website. We'll be referring to this presentation during today's call. I'm going to start as usual with some headlines and I'm going to then lead into a summary of performance for the quarter, then, Matt and Chris are going to go through financial results for the quarter in more detail, and finally, I'll wrap up with our outlook for the coming period. After that, we'll take some questions. The headline is that GBDC had an excellent fiscal fourth quarter, you got a glimpse of this in the preliminary fiscal Q4 results that GBDC announced on October 17th. Let me touch on some of the highlights. Adjusted net investment income per share was $0.50 a record. Also of note, this represented an adjusted NII return on average equity of 13.3%. Adjusted earnings per share came to $0.60, this corresponds to an adjusted return on equity of 16%. Credit results were very strong. We had net realized and unrealized gains for the quarter of $0.10 per share. We saw a decrease in non-accruals and we saw stable internal performance ratings. These factors altogether drove a $0.19 increase quarter-over-quarter in NAV per share, a sequential increase of 1.3%, bringing NAV per share to $15.02 as of September 30th. GBDC's excellent results for the quarter capped off a very strong fiscal 2023. Over the year, we saw $1.73 of adjusted NII per share, $1.52 of adjusted earnings per share, $1.40 per share of distributions paid, you'll recall that GBDC increased our base quarterly distribution by $0.07 per share during the fiscal year, and introduced a new variable supplemental distribution framework. We saw strong credit results, I view fiscal 2023 as one of GBDC's best years ever from a credit perspective and GBDC's Investment Manager during the year permanently reduced its base management fee rate from 1.375% to 1.0% per annum that was effective July 1. In short, we executed on our investment strategy. We leveraged the competitive advantages of the Golub Capital platform and we raised the bar for shareholders. With that, let me hand the floor to Matt to walk through our results in more detail.

Thanks, David. I'm going to start on Slide 4. As David just previewed, GBDC's earnings for the quarter ended September 30 were record setting. Adjusted NII per share was $0.50, a 13% which will increase from the prior quarter's $0.44 per share of adjusted NII. This corresponds to an adjusted NII ROAE of 13.3%. Net income per share increased to $0.60 from $0.43 per share in the prior quarter and represented an adjusted ROAE of 16%. GBDC's record profitability was driven by three key factors, first and foremost, Credit. GBDC had a net realized and unrealized gain on investments of $0.10 per share. This gain was due to both strong credit fundamentals and tightening credit spreads in the market. The second key driver was continued higher base rates. Finally, fiscal Q4 benefited from the previously announced reduction of GBDC's base management fee rate to 1% per annum. The portfolio and balance sheet update generally reflects the continuation of trends from the June 30, 2023 quarter. Net funds declined by $8.4 million sequentially. While we saw a modest uptick in deal activity in calendar Q3 relative to the first half of the year, the pace of new investments remains muted. This is perfectly fine for GBDC. Its model doesn't depend on fee income from new originations or repayments to drive strong returns. The overall credit performance of GBDC's investment portfolio remained strong. Non-accruals continued to decrease. Non-accruals as a percentage of total debt investments at cost decreased to 1.6% from 1.8% at 06/30/2023. As a percentage of total debt investments at fair value, non-accruals decreased to 1.2% from 1.5% at 06/30/23. To put this in context, non-accruals are now back where they were in March and June of 2022. Turning to internal performance ratings, these also remain strong. Investments in rating…

Thanks, Matt. Turning to Slide 7, you can see how the key earnings drivers Matt just described translated into solid growth in NAV per share. The combination of high short-term interest rates, attractive credit spreads, and GBDC's locked-in, low cost leverage profile drove record adjusted NII per share of $0.50, a level meaningfully higher than dividends paid out. In addition, the reversal of prior unrealized appreciation on investments contributed to $0.10 per share of adjusted net realized and unrealized gains. Together, these results drove a net asset value per share increase to $15.02, up $0.19 per share from the prior quarter. Let's now go through the details of GBDC's financial results for the quarter ended September 30, 2023. We've already covered the key points on Slide 9, so we'll start on Slide 10, which summarizes our origination activity for the quarter. Net funds growth quarter-over-quarter was modestly negative as fundings of new investment commitments, delayed draw term loan funding and positive fair value changes of existing investments were outpaced by exits and sales of investments. Market wide deal activity has been slow since last year and remained slow in the September 30th quarter. While we saw a modest uptick in deal activity in calendar Q3 and in our pipeline for calendar Q4, our sense is that a significant rebound is more likely to be a 2024 event. Amid this relatively slow new deal environment, Golub Capital has remained highly selective, closing approximately 1.4% of deals reviewed calendar year-to-date. That's meaningfully lower than our typical 2% to 4% selectivity rate and reflects our focus on quality over quantity. The asset mix of new investments shown in the middle of the slide remained predominantly one-stop loans. Looking at the bottom of the slide, the weighted average rate on new investments decreased by…

Thanks, Chris. Let's move on to Slides 14 and 15 and take a closer look at credit quality metrics. The overall message is that credit trends remain solid and stable. On Slide 14, you can see the non-accruals decreased by 30 basis points sequentially to 1.2% of total debt investments at fair value. We returned one investment to accrual status, which was offset by the addition of one investment to non-accrual status in fiscal Q4. Slide 15 shows the trend in internal performance ratings on GBDC's investments. As of September 30, 2023, around 85% of GBDC's investments were rated 4 or 5, which means they're performing as expected or better than expected at underwriting. The proportion of loans rated 1 and 2, which are the loans we believe are most likely to see significant credit impairment, remain very low at 30 basis points of the portfolio at fair value, the proportion of loans rated 3 increased modestly to 14.6%. You'll recall in our prior conversations that Category 3 loans are performing below expectations or are expected to perform below expectations. When a loan migrates to Category 3, it automatically triggers heightened scrutiny and oversight. It doesn't mean that we necessarily expect a default or loss. Given today's uncertain environment, we think it's prudent to be proactive about moving credits down to Category 3. We'd rather have false positives than miss opportunities for early intervention. This idea of airing on the side of enhanced scrutiny was also the motivation for the portfolio resiliency work that we first described in Q4 of 2022. You'll recall that this work was designed to screen our middle market portfolio for potential vulnerability on a number of dimensions. For example, interest rates, inflation, quality of earnings, and to focus our resources on shoring up credits that…

Thanks, Matt. So, to sum up, GBDC had an excellent quarter and an excellent fiscal year ended September 30. Higher rates helped, a lower base management fee also helped. But the key driver was strong credit results and GBDC's strong credit results, they didn't just happen. They were the result of Golub Capital's processes working again. Over the last 13 years that GBDC has been a public company, its credit results have been best-in-class and fiscal '23 was no different. Our origination team found us opportunities to lend to resilient businesses in resilient industries backed by top-quality sponsors. Our underwriting teams, they carefully selected borrowers that were likely to pay us back across a wide range of different scenarios. Golub Capital’s selectivity ratio of just 1.4% on a year-to-date basis, it shows that deal teams are prioritizing quality over quantity. And our portfolio monitoring, it always emphasizes early intervention after careful name-by-name portfolio reviews. Let me wrap up by talking about our outlook. Overall, I'm cautiously optimistic. I want to talk some more about both the reason for the optimism and the reason for the cautiousness. Let's talk about the optimism first. The economy continues to surprise to the upside, that's a positive. We're also seeing some improvement in middle market M&A activity. That's also a positive. I think the competitive position of Golub Capital has really never been stronger, that's a third positive. From a credit perspective, there are also some good signs. As Matt reported, the vast preponderance of the portfolio is performing well. And while high rates add a higher fixed charge burden for borrowers, the flip side is extra interest income for GBDC, and this gives us a greater margin of safety. Finally, we now have over a year's worth of data about how our portfolio…

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Finian O'Shea with Wells Fargo. Your line is open.

Hey, everyone. Good morning. David, I appreciate some of the macro commentary at the end. Just wanted to drill into that a bit. It sounds like there are green shoots in M&A, which should be good for activity. But can you juxtapose that against the meaningful direct lending inflows we're seeing in the non-traded perpetual BDC channel? How is that impacting the terms and spreads we're seeing today? And do you think there's enough M&A to go around in light of this very powerful fundraising? Thank you.

Thanks, Fin. So it's interesting, we are seeing some countervailing forces right now. On the one hand, we started off, say, summer of '22 in a particularly lender-friendly environment. The BSL market was dislocated as a consequence of the rise in interest rates and the swoon in equity and debt markets generally. There wasn't a robust ability for borrowers to get new deals done in the broadly syndicated market. And consequently, there was a lot of demand in the private market -- in private credit markets, even though M&A was relatively slow, that meant there was a robust pool of deals for us and for other private credit players to choose from. In the last, I would say, six weeks, we've seen a pretty significant increase in the level of M&A activity. And I think from an origination standpoint, Q4 will be a markedly higher quarter for us and for the industry than the last several quarters have been. Having said that, to your point, we've seen a lot of fundraising in direct lending strategies aimed at very large deals, aimed at this BSL replacement market. We play in that market, but that's about, it's 20% of what we do, whereas we have a whole series of competitors where it's basically 100% of what they do. We've seen some very significant spread compression and shift toward more borrower friendly terms and activity in that space. And that's been a trend for months now, but I do think that it's accelerated in the last six weeks or so. For us, this is not a great problem because our focus is on the traditional middle market. I do think you're going to start to see indicia of spread compression in next quarter's earnings reports from the players who focus on the larger market.

That's helpful. Thank you. And also appreciate the color you gave on interest coverage. For the names that have tighter interest coverage, I'm sure that's sort of a spectrum. To what extent are you seeing sponsors put money in? And if not very much, do you see '24 -- 2024 as sort of a make or break timeframe in the need for the sponsor to come up with money and capitalize these companies that, that is, if interest rates remain high? Just any color on that topic? Thank you.

So the question is, what about companies that are tight on interest coverage or fixed charge coverage? How are they managing that? And the answer is, we're seeing a number of different approaches. We're absolutely seeing sponsors step up and put incremental equity in in a large number of cases. We're also seeing companies undertake other strategies in order to create liquidity. Sometimes that's the creation of a HoldCo note or a new PIK preferred issuance. Sometimes it's also growth. Growth has done a good job for many of our borrowers of creating more free cash flow generation that's enabled the formerly tight ratios to look better. So we're seeing different companies approach this in a variety of different ways. I don't think there is one clear pattern to point to. I do think that private equity sponsors are, in general being pretty constructive in addressing liquidity needs in their portfolio companies.

Awesome. Thanks so much.

Your next question comes from the line of Robert Dodd with Raymond James. Your line is open.

Hi, guys. Congratulations on the quarter on the credit quality. So, two questions, one iskind of a follow on to Fin and David your comments there that you've seen some spread compression in the upper end of the market and also that the terms are shifting to a little bit more borrower-friendly at that end of the market. And I think it was Chris or maybe Matt in their prepared remarks said that you've seen the overall spread compression, but the EBITDA definitions and total leverage were still favorable overall. And so that would tend to imply that you hadn’t seen that shift in the bulk, like the 80% of the other stuff. How confident are you that the terms will continue to be diverged between the top end of the market and the more core middle market as we go into 2024 or do you think they're going to converge in 2024, even in the core middle market is going to shift to a much more borrower-friendly set of structures? Hopefully that question is clear enough?

Yeah. Here's how I would describe it, Robert. There is always -- think of it as a pendulum. There is always a swinging between more borrower-friendly and more lender-friendly conditions. And the swing tends to happen first in the broadly syndicated market. Today, that market is not terribly active. So the first place we're really seeing it is in the BSL replacement market, the larger end of the direct lending market. And to Fin's point, that's the place that's seen the most inflows -- the most capital inflows through these non-traded BDC structures. I don't think the middle market and the larger market are disconnected. I think, things tend to happen in the middle market with a lag and to a more modulated degree, and I think that's the pattern we'll see again in 2024.

Got it. Thank you. And then the second one, unrelated to that. On your unsecured notes, you did have an April '24 maturity. I mean, you've got plenty of liquidity on the revolver to just pay it off if you wanted to. But can you give us the thoughts on what that is with a positive outlook? I presume you don't want your unsecured mix to shrink too much? Positive outlook from the rating agencies, that is. So can you give us some thoughts and obviously, borrowing costs are higher today on a fixed rate, but would you be looking to swap or anything like that on that if you were to refinance them?

So all good questions that we're actively looking at. I think your statement is correct that over time we want to maintain unsecureds as really meaningful and important, the right hand side of the GBDC balance sheet. And we're going to always be looking at when's the right time to issue and in connection with issuing, whether the right decision is to swap into floating or not. I think these are all under active consideration.

Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Ryan Lynch with KBW. Your line is open.

Hey, good morning. My first question I had was just related to credit quality. When I look at your overall credit statistics, non-accruals loss in your portfolio, they've been really, really good on a bottom-line standpoint. But I'm just curious when I look at your kind of portfolio monitoring and rating scale, there's been a pretty meaningful uptick, maybe sort of a doubling of those rated 3 credits, over the last year. Those aren't credits that are significantly underperforming, but there is maybe some worrisome there. So how should investors think about, overall credit's been fantastic thus far, but those rated 3 credits have maybe doubled over the last year. How should investors think about that?

So it's a great question, Ryan, and it's one that's a little challenging for us. It's challenging because we're naturally conservative. So we -- and Matt talked about this to a degree. We have an internal modus operandi of downgrading credits to 3, maybe earlier than some of our peers, and we do that because it's part of our process. It's part of, what happens after that is, it triggers a higher level of monitoring, it triggers a level of involvement with management teams and with sponsors. It triggers a whole series of activities that we think are integral to our sustaining that long-term favorable track record that you just alluded to. The place where we see the greatest correlation with future credit losses is in Category 1 and 2 credits. And you didn't mention it, but I will. It's actually fallen over the course of the last year. It's gone from 1.3% to 0.3%. That's an exceptionally low number. So I think you've got to look at the whole picture. Anybody who says that the increase in interest rates that we've seen is irrelevant from a credit perspective doesn't know math. Math does make interest coverage, fixed charge coverage, much harder at today's interest levels than they were in 2021, all things being equal, and our rating system reflects this, our approach to credit decision-making and credit monitoring reflects this.

Okay. That's helpful background on all that. The other question I had was, you mentioned spreads sort of compressing. Maybe some of this is more focused on some of the upper middle market but certainly spreads compressing a little bit, maybe some borrower friendly terms more in the upper middle market, we'll see if that translates to the kind of the core middle market. But my question is kind of why?Why is that occurring? Just because, from a high level,and that's something commonly we've heard from others as well, but I'm just curious, there's been a lot of capital raised and it's been, I feel like, pretty consistent throughout 2023 is from private credit looking to deploy. But now that it seems that there's starting to become some increases in deal flow and deal activity. Now there's a pretty big supply potentially of coming onto the marketplace of guys looking for, additional credit out there. And so it seems like that would actually better balance the supply and demand issue. But it seems that now that there's actually an increase in deal flow and activity, it seems that, that's actually becoming more borrower friendly, which seems a little bit counterintuitive. More people are coming to the market looking for credit. It seems like that would maybe work a little bit more in favor of the lender side. So I'd love to just hear you explain what you're seeing and why.

I don't have an answer for you on that. I think you're correct in your description of what we're seeing. And I'm not sure I have a better explanation than you do on the why. Dynamics like this tend to be a function of supply and demand. So I think we'll get a better sense for those dynamics over the course of the coming months. I think it may get worse from a spread standpoint. Wouldn't shock me.

Got it. Okay. Just the last question I had was, you and others have talked about, kind of seeing a little bit of green shoots and maybe a pickup in activity. In order for that activity, you're talking about maybe a little bit of a rebound now and into the year-end and then potentially a bigger pickup in activity into 2024. I'm just curious, in order for that deal activity to actually cross the finish line and come to fruition, do you get the sense that market conditions just have to sort of stay the same and stabilize right around here or does anything have to change like a cut in base rate, a much stronger sort of growing economy? Or do you think if we just kind of stabilize right around these sort of levels from an economic standpoint, do you think that you'll continue to see a big uptick in deals crossing the finish line at 2024?

I think the things that reduce uncertainty would help. So, by way of example, if we get more data suggesting that the economy is continuing to grow, that inflation is continuing to grind lower, that would be helpful. If we got internationally, some good news in respect of the two wars that are underway, that would be helpful. I think the biggest obstacle right now to seeing a significant rebound, a significant and sustained rebound in deal activity, is the level of uncertainty out there. Having said that, I think we've had a fair bit of time go by since June '22, when the M&A environment took a sudden slowdown in the context of higher rates and the swoons in both equity and credit markets. And I think that's helped a lot in recalibrating valuation, and expectations on the part of both buyers and sellers. There's still in many cases a gap, but I think that gap has narrowed, and I think continued reduction in uncertainty would help in further narrowing.

Okay. Understood. That's all for me today. I appreciate the time.

Thanks, Ryan.

There are no further questions at this time. I will turn the call back to Mr. David Golub for closing remarks.

Well, thank you all for giving us a bit of your time today. I hope you found this call helpful. We look forward to talking to you next quarter. And as always, if you have any questions in the interim, please feel free to reach out. Have a great Thanksgiving everybody.

This concludes today's conference call. We thank you for joining. You may now disconnect your lines.