Good morning and welcome to the GEO Group Third Quarter 2020 Earnings Conference Call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. Should you need assistance, please signal a conference specialist by pressing the star key followed by zero. After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. Please note this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Pablo Paez, Executive Vice President of Corporate Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you, operator. Good morning everyone and thank you for joining us for today's discussion of The GEO Group's third quarter 2020 earnings results. With us today are George Zoley, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, and Founder. Brian Evans, Chief Financial Officer. Ann Schlarb, President of GEO Care, and Blake Davis, President of GEO Secure Services. This morning, we will discuss our third quarter results and outlook. We will conclude the call with a question and answer session. This conference call is also being webcast live on our investor website at investors.geogroup.com. Today, we will discuss non-GAAP basis information. A reconciliation from non-GAAP basis information to GAAP basis results is included in the press release and supplemental disclosure we issued this morning. Additionally, much of the information we will discuss today, including the answers we give in response to your questions may include forward-looking statements regarding our beliefs and current expectations with respect to various matters. These forward-looking statements are intended to fall within the Safe Harbor provisions of the securities laws. Our actual results may differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors contained in our Securities and Exchange Commission filings, including the Form 10-K, 10-Q, and 8-K reports. With that, please allow me to turn this call over to our Chairman and CEO, George Zoley. George?

Thank you, Pablo, and good morning to everyone. This morning we reported our third quarter results and increased our financial guidance for the fourth quarter in the full year. During the third quarter, we experienced a continuation of the favorable cost trends we had experienced in the second quarter, which resulted in better than expected financial performance. While we are encouraged by these favorable cost trends over the last two quarters, we continue to face operational and financial challenges associated with the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Our front-line employees have continued to show incredible commitment and resilience as our company manages through these unprecedented times. From the outset of the pandemic, our facilities have implemented steps to mitigate the risks of COVID-19 to all of those in our care and our employees, and we are continuously evaluating these steps. We remain focused on procuring personal protective equipment, including face masks for all employees, inmates, and detainees at our residential facilities, and we have been steadily ramping up our diagnostic testing capabilities, most recently with the acquisition of 45 Abbott rapid test of devices that we expect to have deployed to our GEO Secure Services facilities by the end of November. Ensuring the health and safety of all of those in our facilities and our employees has always been our number one priority, and we believe the steps we have taken across our facilities and our - and our focus on personal protected equipment and testing have allowed GEO to mitigate the risks associated with the pandemic. While we have continued our operations as an essential government services provider, the COVID pandemic has had a negative financial impact across several segments of our company. Over the last two quarters, we have experienced a decline in overall occupancy levels at our Federal facilities…

Thank you, George. Good morning, everyone. Today we reported third quarter revenues of approximately $579 million and net income attributable to GEO of $0.33 per diluted share. Our third quarter results reflect a $300,000 pre-tax loss on real estate assets, a $1.5 million pre-tax gain on the extinguishment of debt, $1.9 million in pre-tax start-up expenses, $1.7 million in pre-tax close-out expenses, and $2.6 million in pre-tax COVID-related expenses. Excluding these items, we reported third quarter adjusted net income of $0.37 per diluted share. We also reported third quarter AFFO of $0.67 per diluted share. Moving to our outlook, the COVID-19 pandemic continues to have a negative impact on several segments of our company. The pandemic has resulted in lower occupancy levels at several of our facilities and programs beginning in late March and continuing through the second and third quarters. While occupancy levels have begun to stabilize, we expect lower occupancy levels at our ICE and US Marshals facilities to continue through the end of the year. Our GEO Care segment also continues to experience lower occupancy levels in our residential re-entry centers, day reporting programs, and use services facilities, which we expect to continue through the end of the year. As George mentioned, the Federal Bureau of Prisons has extended our contract for our company-owned 1900-bed D. Ray James facility in Georgia through the end of January 2021. As we had previously announced, the Bureau had decided to not renew --, to not rebid this contract due to the decline in federal prison populations, driven in part by the COVID-19 pandemic. Our revised guidance for the fourth quarter and the full year now reflects the four-month extension of the D. Ray James contract which we had previously expected to expire on September 30. Our guidance also reflects the…

Thanks, Brian, and good morning to everyone. I'd like to provide you with an update on our GEO Secure Services business unit and our continued efforts to mitigate the risks associated with COVID-19. From the start of the pandemic, we have taken steps at all of our facilities, which are consistent with the COVID-19 guidance issued for correctional and detention facilities by the CDC. This guidance covers best practices, including the implementation of quarantine, cohorting and medical isolation procedures and educational guidance of - to our employees and individuals in our care on the best preventative measures. We continue to exercise paid leave and paid time off policies to allow our employees to remain home if they exhibit flu-like symptoms or to care for a family member. We have continued to focus our efforts on increased sanitation measures and the deployment of personal protective equipment, including face masks for all of our employees and all those in our care. We have also increased testing at all of our facilities and have recently begun deploying Abbott rapid test devices to our secure services facilities. We are testing a larger percentage of inmates and detainees during the intake process and through the month of October, we have conducted more than 41,000 tests at our facilities. We are continuously evaluating the steps we have taken, and we'll make adjustments to these steps as appropriate and necessary based on updated guidance by the CDC and other best practices. We remain incredibly grateful for our frontline employees who continue making daily sacrifices to report to work and provide high quality and compassionate care for all of those in our facility. Before I turn the call to Ann, I would like to briefly discuss a few operational highlights. In the third quarter, we began the activation of our company-owned Golden State ICE Annex in California, which we expect to achieve normalized operations during the fourth quarter of 2020. Effective this week, we also entered into an operational contract modification to continue the process of activating the Desert View ICE Annex in California, and we remain hopeful to be able to activate our company-owned Central Valley California Annex in the near future. During the third quarter, we also entered into a 4-month extension through the end of January 2021 with the Federal Bureau of Prisons for our D. Ray James, Georgia facility. This contract was previously set to expire on September 30. Additionally, we recently completed the deactivation of our out-of-state contract with the State of Idaho at the Eagle Pass, Texas facility. We have entered into an agreement with the United States Marshal Service for the use of Eagle Pass during 2021. Finally, in Australia, we have now completed a 480-bed expansion at the Junee Correctional Center increasing total capacity to 1280 beds and a 137-bed expansion at the Fulham Correctional Centre, bringing total capacity to 1045 beds. At this time, I will turn the call over to Ann for a review of GEO Care.

Thank you, Blake, and good morning everyone. I'd like to provide you with an update on the continued steps we are taking to mitigate the risks of COVID-19 across our GEO Care business unit. Consistent with the efforts undertaken by our GEO Secure Services facilities, we have issued COVID-19 guidance for all of our residential facilities in GEO Reentry and GEO Youth Services, consistent with the guidance issued by the CDC. This guidance includes quarantine and cohorting policies and procedures as well as educational guidance to our employees and all individuals in our care on the best preventative measures to mitigate the spread of COVID-19. We have focused our efforts on increased sanitation measures, deployment of personal protective equipment, including face masks and testing. We continue to exercise paid leave and paid time off policies to allow our employees to remain home if needed, and we have implemented additional screening measures for entry into our facilities. We continuously evaluate these steps, and we'll make adjustments as appropriate and necessary based on updated guidance by the CDC and other best practices. The COVID-19 pandemic has had a negative impact on several of our residential reentry centers and nonresidential day reporting programs, which continue to experience lower occupancy and referral levels. The pandemic has also impacted occupancy levels in our youth services segment and as we previously disclosed, COVID-19 related challenges led to the closure of our Hector Garza facility in Texas during the third quarter Notwithstanding these unprecedented challenges, we have had several recent positive highlights. During the third quarter, we completed the reactivation of our company-owned Park View Center in Alaska under a new 112-bed contract with the Alaska Department of Corrections. We also recently activated 11 new day reporting program sites in Tennessee with a capacity to serve approximately 2900 participants under a new contract with the Tennessee Department of Corrections. These recent milestones are indicative of the resilience of our GEO Care divisions which have remained focused on delivering high quality services to the participants in our care on behalf of our government agency partners. We remain very proud of our front-line employees who continue to report to work every day to deliver rehabilitation and reentry programming to those in our care, often in new and innovative ways including through virtual technologies. At this time, I'll turn the call back to George for his closing remarks.

Thank you, Ann. We are incredibly proud of all of our employees whose daily commitment and dedication we believe has allowed our company to mitigate the risks of the unprecedented global COVID-19 pandemic. Despite the significant challenges associated with COVID-19, we believe that our earnings and cash flows remain strong, and our business is supported by long-term real estate assets and high-quality contracts entailing essential government services. We provided a high-quality essential services for more than 30 years under both Democratic and Republican administrations and under chambers of Congress controlled by both parties. We believe that our company will continue to be able to provide innovative and diversified services to the Federal Government under either party following the upcoming election. We recognize that the current political rhetoric and mischaracterization of our role as the government services provider has created concerns regarding our future access to capital, but our board has taken steps to reduce our quarterly dividend payments in order to preserve capital and allocate our excess cash flows towards debt repayment. Our management team remains focused on effectively allocating capital, and we believe that these steps will allow us to balance providing value to our shareholders, while focusing on paying down debt and deleveraging. That completes our presentation. We will be glad to address any questions.

We will now begin the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] The first question comes from Joe Gomes of Noble Capital, please go ahead.

Good morning and thanks for taking my questions.

Good morning.

Just wanted to kind of start on the big picture and you've talked a little bit about - about, I don't know if you give a little more color or detail on this election and what your guy's thoughts or what you're preparing for if Biden wins versus Trump wins. Biden has made some comments about eliminating the use of private companies, just trying to get a little more color and detail on what your thoughts are and what you guys are looking at going forward after the election?

It wouldn't be appropriate for us to speculate on the potential outcome of the presidential election, but as we've mentioned earlier, we provided a high-quality essential services to the federal government for more than 30 years under both Democratic and Republican administrations and under different controls of Congress by both parties. So we grew fairly steadily under the Obama-Biden administration previously and unless there is a major change in border security, I don't know that there will be much changes. So, we will look at whether there is actual policy differences that applied to our business as if there is a change of parties but otherwise, we are just continue to do our job and try to do our best to mitigate the COVID-19 pandemic. But as we've stressed, we have 3.5 decades of high-quality services under both parties.

Okay, thank you for that and on the D. Ray James, obviously congrats on getting the extension there, but what, what changed at least in your guys' opinion from the BOP saying in the second quarter, basically saying, we don't need the facility anymore to all of a sudden and saying, oh, wait a minute, we'll give you at least four more months on the facility that we need it. I mean what happened or what turned around there on the BOP side?

We obviously can't speak for the BOP, but we would - hazard to guess that - being in the middle of COVID-19 pandemic may have something to do about shutting down a facility and having to transfer a lot of people to other facilities, which would be very problematic.

Okay. And you mentioned again, congrats on some of the recent activations here at Golden State and Desert View this week. You mentioned that Desert View was a contract modification, what modifications were made for that?

That will involve the use of the facility in part by the US Marshals Service.

Okay. Okay. On Eagle Pass, you talked about the US Marshals Service will be using that in 2021. Are there any major differences in that contract versus the other contracts, maybe that were signed 6, 9, 12 months ago, and just reflecting the COVID situation in declining populations that have occurred or is there contract pretty much similar to the previous contracts that you have signed with the US Marshal Service?

Well, they're very different clients. One is the State client with a fairly stable population and the other one is a Federal agency that is holding presentence criminals and with where there is a lot of turnover of those individuals inside the facility, so operationally, it's a very different kind of situation, but financially, they are very similar.

Okay. And I know in many industries, given what's going on here with the pandemic - has stressed state budgets significantly, as you guys have contract renewals coming up, has there been pushback from the state in terms of pricing or is it they're taking more of a wait and see approach given the pandemic, just any color or detail there would be appreciated.

I think the states are taking a wait and see approach, particularly with regard whether there will be a second stimulus bill passed and many, if not most of the states are not currently in session. There'll be reviewing their budgets early next year.

Okay. And have you made any progress in any of the property sales that you've talked about last quarter and again today?

Well we progressed in identifying facilities and trying to group them between potential sales to governmental agencies versus third parties due to their real estate value and in their particular locations, so we don't have a sale as yet, but we are positioning and progressing in our execution of that strategy.

Okay and one last one from me and I'll get back in queue. Thank you for all the answers to my questions. Just in the last quarter you guys had talked about some of the other opportunities out there, one was in Nebraska, just trying to get a little update there and is there anything else that has popped up since the second quarter that is in the pipeline that could be potential new opportunities for you guys?

I think the Nebraska. The Nebraska RFP is moving forward, but it's kind of slow at this point.

ICE has issued a request for information for location of capacity in the Northeast, and we are preparing to respond to that.

Okay, great, thank you very much. Appreciate it.

The next question is from Mitra Ramgopal of Sidoti. Please go ahead.

Yes, hi, good morning. Thanks for taking the questions. First, I just wanted to get a sense on the cost trends you're seeing and obviously on one side you're incurring increased spending related to COVID, but I think you're benefiting recently from lower medical cost, et cetera. And I was just ordering how it at feared in 3Q, given that we are hearing that elective procedures are starting to pick up, et cetera, if that's becoming less of a tailwind for you?

While we still had experienced a fair amount of that in third quarter, the main savings areas have been labor just due to lower occupancy levels in the facility. So, we've been able to manage staff differently and reduce over time and then secondarily, has been the medical off sites as we've discussed before. We are starting to see I think some return to normalcy, but I don't think it's moved all the way back to where it was pre-COVID, but we are seeing some of that and we've been, for the balance of this year, I think we've been cautious in how much additional credit we've taken for that in the fourth quarter.

Okay, thanks. And as it relates to the incremental expenses related to COVID, are you able to pass that on at any level in terms of whether it's new contract negotiations or pricing?

A little bit of it, it depends. We have and the pro forma adjustments don't include anything that we can pass on to the customer. I'd say that's our net cost. So, we're working that side of it, but it's limited what we'll be able to pass on that which we can, we're working to do that.

Okay and then just coming back to the contract retention. Obviously, this year it's going to be down versus what we've seen historically. Just wanted to get a sense in terms of obviously with COVID, It seems it's still, it's going to be disruptive at least next few quarters with the recent surges, just sense us how you view contract retention in terms of maybe not picking back up potential in 2021 and beyond?

Well, as you know, the contract retention rate in the industry is very high. We had the one contract that wasn't renewed as George discussed earlier, the D. Ray James facility. The other one that I think of that material was the Eagle Pass facility, but those were out of state inmates and it's pretty typical within the industry for those beds to go back to their state of origin or whatever or they needed more capacity and we just couldn't provide that. So that's why they moved away, but we've already, as George discussed and Blake discussed are expecting to be able to activate that facility with the US Marshal Service.

Okay, that's great. And as it relates to capital allocation, I know debt reduction remains the priority right now, but given where the stocks at, I was wondering if maybe share repurchases resulting that might also be on the table in terms of use of capital at this point?

I think it's always it potential but our main focus is as George indicated maintaining the dividend which is returning something to shareholders focusing on debt repayment and then we do still see that we'll have a need for some growth investments. So, as we mentioned during the call, we increased our expected capital outlay for this year related to the activation of the facilities in California for ICE. So it's possible, but I'd say it's farther down the wrong right now of where we're going to allocate capital towards.

Okay, now that is fair. And then on the CapEx allocation, obviously it's higher this year and you're still going through the budget process for next year, but is it fair to assume we probably see it return to more normal levels?

Well, I think we'll see a step down some next year, there still may be some of this capital related to the ICE project in California and then as we've previously discussed, we also have some replacement of equipment in the electronic monitoring business as a result of changing technology there. So, it will still have some reasonable amount of CapEx next year, but it will be less than this year, for how much I can't say exactly, probably at least $20 million.

Okay, thanks. And then finally just on a big picture. As a result of COVID, I was just wondering if, just from a competitive environment as it relates to being able to bring on new business, et cetera. How would you characterize it?

Well, we are developing new businesses, our new announcements regarding the ICE annexes has taken place. One is fully activated. Another one is expected to be activated this year, and a third will be activated we believe shortly. It's the beginning of next year. And then our Eagle Pass facility is, we expect the Marshal Service to activate that facility is beginning of next year as well. So we have a lot of continued growth issues that as Brian just said, we have to spend some money to repurpose these facilities for the particular client and, we are glad to do so. We're glad we have this growth opportunity.

Okay. Thanks again for taking the questions.

The next question is from Nick Jarmoszuk of Stifel. Please go ahead.

Hi, good morning. What, if we get an update on the asset sale figure proceeds. I believe last quarter, as mentioned, it could be up to $100 million. Is that still the right ballpark to think about?

Yes, I think that's the number we're targeting that wouldn't necessarily I'll be in one year. But over a several year period, we think we can maybe achieve that.

And then how should we think about proceeds, where would they be applied to?

Well, we will apply those to reducing debt, as we talked about before. Typically, just from a flexibility perspective, we will reduce the revolver and then over the longer term, we may be able to reduce some of the bonds outstanding.

Question on the D. Ray James facility, what's your estimate for how long it takes to relocate the entire population? What I'm getting at is, would there be another extension?

That's a call by the Bureau of Prisons, but right now we're looking probably at about a three months demobilization plan and that can always be extended by the Bureau of Prisons. It's a lot of it depends on the COVID environment and if it improves on the Federal side and how things progress with a vaccine or just general medical care.

Within the facility, have you seen any actions that they are winding down operations there or is it, does it, is it more business as usual?

We have, we have reduced the number over the last few months and then it stalled for about 30 days, while we reassessed and the Bureau does have plans to demobilize at a very gradual pace. As I stated, that pace will be dictated by their need and this COVID environment.

And then with the other facilities, could you provide an estimate for how many of them are generating the contracted minimums?

You say generating the contract in minimum facilities that are at or below their contract minimums?

Yes.

So, all of our BOP facilities for, may except maybe one, are full fixed price contracts. So, there always it 100% of the revenues. I think there is one that's still an older version of the contract is 95% guarantee. All of our ICE contracts except one I believe have minimum fixed payments per month. And given ICE is operating temple [ph] right now, all of those facilities are at or below their minimum occupancy and that's what we've assumed for our forecast for the year starting. We did that back in the second quarter when we revised our forecast and then our Marshals contracts, it's a mix. Some of them have the fixed payments, some of them don't. The Marshals' populations are down some, but not as much as ICE and then lastly, most of our state contracts have some sort of fixed component as well, and the state populations have stayed - have come down a little bit, but are still quite a bit higher than the Federal populations outside the BOP, and they are more in line with their traditional averages.

So, with the '21 outlook and the budget you're putting together, how can we think about upside-downside between they're being the COVID resolution and effective vaccine and stabilization of for all infection rate versus a pandemic that extends for still, still a number of quarters. What's the, how can we think about the upside-downside scenario there?

Well, obviously, we're still in the middle of the - we're still building our budget. We're going to be flexible around COVID, what's going on in the market, but I think from a - from a planning perspective that we're going to go based on what we know today. There is talk about vaccines and that, but nothing in the market. So, we will continue to sort of I think apply the more the current status quo, maybe we'll see some improvement late next year, but there is no public information that would say otherwise currently. So, we think that's the most prudent and cautious way to do our planning for next year.

And then last question just on the '22 notes, can you talk about how you think about the refinancing options there?

Well, as we said before, we have, we have liquidity under the revolver. We will continue to monitor the market and if there seems to be an opportunistic time to go either do a refinancing from using another bond or we may look at alternative structures like a convertible note or something like that, but we think that there is there is definitely access in capacity to be able to replace those notes or take them out.

Thank you.

The next question is from Matthew Larson of National Securities. Please go ahead.

Thanks, guys, for taking my call. Question is more on the big picture. All right, you guys are essentially a landlord and you have a tenant which fortunately pays other bills. I would, the New York City and there is long term landlord you own skyscrapers and what have you and nobody showing up at the office and no one's paying rent and I say no one, I don't mean literally, but so based on what our cap rate that these buildings were worth, certainly are less and the future is going to look a little different. We don't know how many, how much space is going to be required and how many inmates aren't coming back to the prison, okay, if I can make the analogy with you all whereas some inmates have been let out because of COVID, prison reform, or liberal I'll say a little more progressive sorts of notions about just letting people out early, so but at least your tenants have been paying, and I assume we'll get through this and I assume there will be a need for prisons, and it might be reduced, but the rhetoric we've seen has been on the federal level, and if I'm not mistaken, 80% plus of your contracts are with states and if states budgets are stretched, it seems to me that would be more interested in spending whatever money they have on education, infrastructure things like that and outsourcing prison or detention centers would be preferable versus taking it on themselves or building a new facility. I mean, is that an accurate statement about the state of affairs of your business? It's depressed because every real estate-oriented businesses depressed and yours, it seems the prices of your stock, and your main competitor - your main public competitor are certainly down dramatically and as if they're going out of business. I'm actually I shouldn't say things like that, but as if they're malls or something like that, which people may not ever go back to. With that in mind, is there a sense that states will continue to keep you as clients, regardless of what one administration might feel about for profit prisons, and therefore it doesn't affect the bulk of your business?

Well, in our 35-year track record, we have a retention track record of over 90% because we are in the Central Government services provider at the Federal and state levels, and Federal - state levels in many cases, states have preferred allowing the private sector to come in and use private sector financing to build these new facilities that were needed because of overcrowding situations in their own prisons. That benefited them by allowing them to use their scarce financial resources to apply to other areas like building schools. So, we are glad to have done that over the last three decades and expect that we will continue to be favored to do that. At the federal level, there is, we operate on behalf of three federal agencies, the BOP, the Marshal Service, and ICE. BOP is an operator and they have their own facilities, and our facilities have been a supplement to theirs, holding primarily criminal aliens. For the Marshal Service and ICE, they are not operators. They depend on either the private sector or in combination with the public sector to provide the capacity for --their needs, and we've been doing that for 35 years, and we expect to continue to do that, because they don't have their own facilities. They are not operators. Unlike the BOP which has its own facilities, US Marshal Service and ICE have used primarily the private sector and the public sector to provide them with facilities and capacity to carry out their responsibilities, and we've been a major player in that scenario.

All right. So, then I could draw from that, right now the border is shut down more than it would normally be because of COVID. In the same way, I can't fly to Paris because they are not going to let me land or I will have to quarantine myself. There is greater restriction of people coming over the border, you don't seem to hear about a border crisis anymore from either side of the aisle. But if one administration got in - I do not blame if Democratic administration came in and they have been the ones who have been more likely to talk about doing away with the for-profit prisons, one could generalize that may be the border openings would be more porous and there will be a need to house these folks in detention centers until their individual situations are adjudicated, alright? So, I mean it seems to me that that could actually, since you said ICE doesn't have any facilities on their own, they would need people like yourself. So, I'll just make it as the comments and unless it's you feel that that's completely way off, then a lot of the concern, not a lot, some portion of the concern of shutting down or not doing business private prisons is maybe blown because if ICE doesn't have their own, they're going to need somebody and you've been there for decades and if as long as you're supplying a fair and competitive product, then presumably you'll still get some business from ICE regardless of who is in the White - who would administrations in the White House is that reasonably accurate thing to say?

I think it is. As long as there is a policy of Border Enforcement, we will play - continue to play a role in supporting that policy.

Okay. And then, another thing that it has been an issue is that you've essentially been red lined by all the major banks, where they just don't want to loan to you presumably for politically correct reasons or are they just don't need the bad press, which to me is it's just kind of a libertarian. I think that's discriminatory and essentially, it's redlining. Is there any sort of legal recourse you might have about having some of the financing markets closed down to you, which just simply because you're in a business that you know, JP Morgan doesn't feel they need the bad press or A, is that something that could be brought up, since you are supplying the needed service for most people I think we believe that, some people feel that, I mean some people feel that any sort of - I really don't understand the point of the folks that feel that a for-profit prison is some sort of a bad thing unless you're supplying a substandard service, but I guess I'm just talking about the financing thing, I mean is that something that seems discriminatory to you and maybe there some recourse, but secondarily is there plenty of money out there albeit maybe at a higher cost from private equity or - or private sources who really don't care about politicians spitting something in some way, so that regardless of the political wins going forward you will always have access to some capital to just be more expensive, which might cut into your, you know your bottom line. Is that also an accurate thing to say?

This is Brian. First on the question of discriminatory lending and whatnot. You know, there's been some discussion at the federal level, I think from the Office of the Currency of the Comptroller and some of the US members of the Senate Finance Committees, et cetera., pressing that issue and I think we'll just have to see how it works out. Our industry isn't the only one who's been facing that issue. We're a smaller industry, but the oil and gas industry has been facing that sort of pressure as well. The gun industry and the ammunition industry are facing that. So there is a number of different industries that have that as you point out are all legal industries providing lawful services, et cetera. And we'll just have to see how that works out. But we're obviously monitoring that situation. And then as far as the capital markets, we do continue to believe that we'll have access as you said, the prices may be higher, but that's part of the reason why we're focusing on making some modest debt reduction also to offset those potential higher prices. And I think as the political rhetoric and situation stabilizes that will also help with the prices in the market over time.

All right. And just wanted two other things, because I'm trying to look at the whole - the big picture here, particularly because of the level of your company's stock price, I know that's probably looked at pretty closely by you all. I know that George made some very large stock purchases this year. Nobody knows the business better than him. This is George I'm speaking with? I'm not sure.

Yes, it is.

Okay. I'm sorry. So, you certainly know the business better than anybody, and I guess what I'm saying is that, if the public markets currently are not rewarding you all for your earnings power or the fact that you have AAA tenants paying you rent even though they might need a little less space going forward because of COVID or prison reform or who knows what or a closing of the border at some point that will stabilize and I would assume you would rationalize your capacity, but one way to do that would be to sell some of your facilities to the states or the Federal government, if they want to manage it themselves, I guess I've read up or I've gotten, I've been on the impression that you're facilities are perhaps superior to some of the ones the states own or the Fed's might own that are decades old, and if it's anything like public schools versus private schools here in New York, there is a significant difference in quality. So if necessary, are these facilities you could sell so that one could put kind of a floor under what the value of your company is regardless of whether they that you were shut down to a greater degree because we live in very unusual times and you have - no one has no idea what some administration might do just to score some points or if they just completely open up the jail doors to - in the name of prison reform. So, is that A, an option and B, if your stock prices don't - if your stock price doesn't recover, I mean could you just go private? I mean, a private equity firm who may not care - it might multi-billion dollar private equity firm may not care about public opinion. They realize it's a long game 10 or 15 years, administrations come and go. I also can say this Obama, his talking point when he was trying to get elected in LA, was he was going to close Guantanamo in eight years, he never did, so that these things really never come off and with all the problems facing, any numerous administration, it seems to me closing for-profit prison has got a ranked pretty far down there. I mean we have bigger things facing our country than that. So, do you feel that there is private equity money out there that would pay a premium for you all if the public markets are not rewarding you for your, your earnings capability?

You know, a lot of good questions. But we're not going to make any dramatic situations in the transitional period that I think the country's sense. The economy is in a transitional period because of this pandemic, and people will have to see beyond where we are now to normalization to a path forward and not to overreact to temporary circumstances. We've been around for 35 years on, I hope we're around another 35 years, and we'll just work our way through this and the way we do it has been through what we believe is our track record for operational excellence. Yes, we do have the best facilities of our - of the kind we operate in the world, whether they're state facilities or Federal facilities. So, we are proud of the facilities we operate. Yes, they are better than our counterpart governmental facilities and the asset value of those facilities is probably $4 billion or $5 billion, but we're not going to be reckless in cashing them in at time - in a stressful time that's just transitional, it's not appropriate. There is no need to make these dramatic decisions when you're going through a period that is stressful to the economy and to the political situation at the federal and state levels, but we have a lot of options. We are aware of what those options are, and we will monitor the situation and take action as necessary.

Okay. I mean that's just kind of what I wanted to, wanted to hear because when stocks get into the single digits and they're heading south, a lot of it is just probably just selling by endowments or foundations or who knows public pension plans or just momentum selling that could be putting in a climactic low, and so what I wanted to hear is what you told me is that you have facilities that have significant value. It's not as if you're - I'm not suggesting one sell them or anything like that. I'm. What I'm saying is that in the worst-case scenario, you have assets that someone is going to value at some point. And even if you lease them out to state or federal people and let them run them, they represent an asset that has a long life ahead of them. And so that investing - trading in the single digits that have never really been there in years, one has to know their downside and it's my sense that if I can have a five-year viewpoint or 10-year, then that's the time to consider them strongly and so I'm just trying to figure out what the data says. It sounds like you do have access to some financing if necessary, even if it costs you a little more, whether it's convertible or through other sources. You have assets that have value on their own and going forward, society will be as it is, there'll be a need for housing prisoners or people coming over the border or who knows what and you all have been supplying that service for 35 years. There's no reason to think that you won't be for the next 35 years or so. All right, thanks so much for answering my questions, and I guess letting me to - I guess express a little bit of my, my just opinion, if nothing else, so I'll move on and let somebody else ask their question.

Thank you for those questions.

The next question is from Bill Fan of New York Life. Please go ahead.

Yes, hi. Can you hear me. Thank you. Hello.

Yes, we can hear you.

Great. Yes, thank you for taking my question. I got a lot of the questions have concerned about political. I don't want to ask that. I just want to ask, assuming no big political headwinds to us, just considering about COVID, I think in the short term, it's going to be, continue to have some pressure but there should be no problem about us alive, unlike in those - unlike or any other, but do you see, I mean like a turning point was the upside growth in the longer view two years later, or the legacy is there a lot of upside?

Once the vaccine is made available nationally, we think there'll be a restoration of normal enforcement policies, and we would have higher occupancies at our facilities and restore revenues that we've seen decrease during this pandemic. So, by many estimates, that will occur sometime next year.

That concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to George Zoley for closing remarks.

Well, thank you for those exciting questions, and we'll look forward to addressing you in the next quarterly conference call. Thank you.

The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.