Good day, and welcome to the GEO Group Fourth Quarter 2023 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Please note, today’s event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Pablo Paez, Executive Vice President of Corporate Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you, operator. Good morning, everyone and thank you for joining us for today’s discussion of the GEO Group’s fourth quarter and full year 2023 earnings results. With us today are George Zoley, Executive Chairman of the Board; Brian Evans, Chief Executive Officer; Wayne Calabrese, President and Chief Operating Officer; Shayn March, Acting Chief Financial Officer; and James Black, President of GEO Secure Services. This morning, we will discuss our fourth quarter and full year results as well as our outlook. We will conclude the call with a question-and-answer session. This conference call is also being webcast live on our investor website at investors.geogroup.com. Today, we will discuss non-GAAP basis information. A reconciliation from non-GAAP basis information to GAAP basis results is included in the press release and the supplemental disclosure we issued this morning. Additionally, much of the information we will discuss today, including the answers we give in response to your questions, may include forward-looking statements regarding our beliefs and current expectations with respect to various matters. These forward-looking statements are intended to fall within the safe harbor provisions of the securities laws. Our actual results may differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors contained in our Securities and Exchange Commission filings, including the Form 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K reports. With that, please allow me to turn this call over to our Executive Chairman, George Zoley. George?

Thank you, Pablo, and good morning to everyone. Thank you for joining us on our fourth quarter 2023 earnings call. I’m joined today by our newly reorganized senior management team, including our new CEO, Brian Evans, our new President and Chief Operating Officer, Wayne Calabrese, and our new Acting Chief Financial Officer, Shayn March, along with our President of GEO Secure Services James Black. While Brian, Shayn and Wayne are new to their positions they have each been with the company a long time. During today’s call, we will review our fourth quarter financial results for 2023 recap the annual operational milestones for each of our business segments, provide an update of our continued efforts to reduce debt and deleverage our balance sheet and discuss our initial financial guidance for 2024, which includes a range of assumptions primarily related to the ongoing federal budget discussions in Congress. During the fourth quarter of 2023, our diversified business units continued to deliver strong operational and financial performance. This morning, we reported fourth quarter ‘23 revenues of approximately $608 million and GAAP net income of approximately $32 million. We also reported fourth quarter ‘23 adjusted EBITDA of approximately $129 million, which represents a sequential increase of 8% from the third quarter of 2023. During the fourth quarter, our Security Services business unit renewed 2 important contracts at the federal level. In Colorado, we renewed our contract with ICE for the provision of the company owned 1,532-bed Aurora ICE Processing Center and associated secure support services for a 1-year term. In California, we renewed our contract with U.S. Marshall for the provision of secure support services at the government-owned 512-bed El Centro detention facility for a 2-year term. At the state level, we received a 2-year renewal of our lease agreement with the state…

Thank you, George. Good morning, everyone. As the prior CFO for 14 years, it is my pleasure to join George and our senior management team and the new capacity of CEO as we work together to continue to execute our company’s strategic priorities. Our continued and steady financial performance is underpinned by the strength of our diversified services platform. Over the past 20 years, our Board and our management team have implemented a disciplined strategy to pursue diversified opportunities that grow our company both organically and through strategic acquisitions of businesses and assets. We believe this growth and investment strategy has positioned GEO as a leading diversified services provider in our industry. And the strength of this diversification has allowed us to deliver steady operational and financial results through challenging periods. Over the course of the COVID pandemic, we were able to offset declines in our secure services and residential reentry revenues with increases in our community-based and nonresidential program. Similarly, in 2021 and 2022, we were able to offset the loss of our Bureau of Prisons contract revenues with increases in our electronic monitoring and supervision services revenues. And in 2023, we offset declines in our electronic monitoring segment with growth from several of our diversified segments, including our secure transportation and international businesses. As we look forward to 2024, we believe that we are taking a prudent approach to our initial financial guidance given the uncertainty surrounding the outcome and timing of the ongoing federal budget discussions in Congress. While decisions related to federal funding and related policies are out of GEO control, as a company we are positioned to continue to support ICE and the U.S. Marshall with a spectrum of support services and solutions, including additional bed capacity, secure transportation, electronic monitoring technologies and case management…

Thank you, Brian. Good morning, everyone. Today, we reported fourth quarter 2023 GAAP net income of approximately $32 million and quarterly revenues of approximately $608 million. We also reported fourth quarter 2023 adjusted EBITDA of approximately $129 million. Looking at each of our segments, managed-only revenues for the fourth quarter of 2023 increased by approximately 18% from 1 year ago. This increase was driven by higher revenues in our secured transportation in international segments related to our new subcontract provide air support services for ICE and our new healthcare contract in Victoria, Australia, respectively. Fourth quarter 2023 revenues for our owned and leased secure services facilities increased by approximately 4% from 1 year ago, which was primarily driven by increased population at our ICE [indiscernible]. Further, quarter revenues in our GEO Reentry segment also increased year-over-year with fourth quarter 2023 revenues from our residential reentry centers and our nonresidential reentry programs experiencing an 11% increase and a 32% increase, respectively. These revenue increases were offset by lower revenue from our electronic monitoring and supervision Services segment during the fourth quarter of 2023 as a result of lower participation counts under the ISAP contract compared to the fourth quarter of 2022. Our fourth quarter 2023 results also reflect a year-over-year decrease in net interest expense due to the repayment of debt throughout the year as well as due to higher interest income compared to fourth quarter 2022. Our effective tax rate for the fourth quarter of 2023 was approximately 20%. Moving to our guidance for 2024. As George and Brian discussed, we believe that ICE continues to face budgetary pressures and the outcome and timing of ongoing federal budget discussions in Congress remains uncertain. Recent news articles have reported that ICE is facing a $700 million budget deficit that will be…

Thank you, Shayn. Good morning, everyone. It is my pleasure to review the annual milestones for GEO Secure Services. During 2023, we renewed 15 secure services contracts, including 10 contracts at the federal level with ICE and the U.S. Marshall. During the year, our Secure Services facility is also successfully underwent a total of 209 audits, including internal audits, government reviews, third-party accreditations and Prison Rape Elimination Act or pre-certifications. Wells of our secure services facilities received accreditation from the American Correctional Association with an average score of 99.3%, and another 14 facilities received precertification. Our GTI Transportation division and our GEO Amey UK joint venture completed approximately 18 million miles driven in the United States and the UK during the year. Moving to current trends for our government agency partners. At the federal level, populations at our U.S. Marshall detention facilities remained stable throughout 2023. Our U.S. Marshall facilities around the country support the agency as it carries out its mission of providing custodial services for pretrial detainees facing federal criminal proceeding. We believe that our U.S. Marshall facilities provide needed bed space in their federal courthouses, where there is generally a lack of suitable alternative detention capacity. In the fourth quarter, we renewed our contract with the U.S. Marshall to provide secure residential support services for the government-owned 512-bed El Centro detention facility for a 2-year term. Moving to our ICE Processing Centers. We experienced a steady increase in ICE populations throughout 2023. And most recently, we saw an 18% increase during the fourth quarter of 2023. During the fourth quarter, we also renewed our contract with ICE for the provision of the 1,532 bed Aurora ICE Processing Center and related secure residential support services in Colorado. Additionally, as we previously disclosed in December of 2023, we received…

Thank you, James. I’m pleased to provide an overview of the annual operational milestones for our GEO Care business unit. In 2023, we renewed 32 residential reentry center contracts, including 16 contracts with the Federal Bureau of Prisons. Additionally, we renewed 52 nonresidential day reporting center contracts. During the year, our residential reentry centers, nonresidential day reporting centers and ISAP offices successfully underwent a combined total of 338 audits, including internal audits, government reviews, third-party accreditations and pre-certifications. 11 of our residential reentry centers received accreditation from the American Correctional Association in 2023, with an average accreditation score of 99.9% and 8 of our residential reentry centers received pre-certifications. Our 35 residential reentry centers provide transitional housing and rehabilitation programs for individuals reentering their communities across 14 states. Our nonresidential and day reporting centers provide high-quality community-based services, including cognitive behavioral treatment for up to approximately 9,100 parole and probationers at approximately 90 locations across 10 different states. All key outcome metrics in our reentry programs showed improvement throughout the year, attesting to our evidence-based practices and a track record for lowering the rate of recidivism. Moving to our GEO in-prison programs and Continuum of Care division. In 2023, we delivered enhanced in-custody rehabilitation to an average daily population of approximately 2,600 individuals at 30 in-prison program sites in 7 states and post-release services to approximately 21,000 individuals at 13 Continuum of Care sites in 8 states. During the year, we renewed 5 in-prison treatment contracts across the country. Our in-custody rehabilitation services include academic programs focused on helping those in our care attain high school equivalency diplomas. We’ve made a significant investment to equip all of our classrooms with smart boards to aid in the delivery of academic instruction at all our facilities. We have also focused on developing…

Thanks, Wayne. In closing, our diversified business units delivered strong financial and operational performance throughout 2023. We’ve taken what we believe is a prudent approach to our initial financial guidance for 2024, given the uncertainty surrounding current federal budget discussions in Congress. However, as we said today, we believe we have several opportunities for potential upside. We are actively marketing our current idle facilities and our diversified services as we pursue quality growth opportunities for our company. We also remain focused on reducing our overall net debt and refinancing portions of our debt. These efforts are aimed at reducing our annual interest costs and gaining the flexibility of potential return of capital to shareholders in the future. Operational, we remain steadfast in our commitment to achieving operational excellence in the daily delivery of our services on behalf of our government agency partners. We are grateful for our 18,000 employees worldwide, whose dedication and professionalism has allowed GEO to accomplish the milestones we have highlighted for you today. That completes our remarks and we’d be glad to take some questions Operator?

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] And today’s first question comes from Joe Gomes with NOBLE Capital. Please go ahead.

Good morning. Nice quarter.

Thank you.

So you mentioned, George, in your remarks about the underfunding of ICE. And I’m sure you guys have seen the reports that it came out yesterday, another article today about speculation, call it, that they’re going to release people from ICE down to 22,000 beds from the current, as you said, $38,500. And I was just trying to get your thoughts on that happening. I understand you don’t know about the funding yet, just more general your thoughts. And has something like this ever occurred previously in ICE where they just had a mass release excluding the COVID time frame?

I don’t think there’s been anything of comparable scope and nature as being discussed in the press release that came from the White House regarding ICE populations. But I’m encouraged by reading one of the news articles today that the House Republicans are planning to unveil Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan and boarder bill as an alternative to the border-free package that was passed by the Senate Tuesday. And the lawmakers are expected to release this bill any day now. So our hope is one of optimism that funding for Foreign aid can be tied to funding for border security in a comprehensive and compromise basis that will take care of the critical elements in both issues.

Okay, thanks. And as we all know; you have a number of contracts at your facilities that have guaranteed levels. I’m just wondering, are all those facilities now at or above those levels? Or do you still have a couple that are below those guaranteed levels?

I think most are above those levels. And most of our facilities do have those guarantees where you referenced. The higher levels are most likely along the southern border locations where the activity is most prevalent. We do have capacity, as was mentioned previously, between 7,000 and 9,000 we call them incremental beds at existing facilities that could be provided to ICE depending on the result of additional funding for the agency.

Okay. And just shifting gears here for a second, we talked in the past; there was a request for information about monitoring. And I was just wondering if there’s been any update on that or any movement on that potential change in the monitoring?

I think that was RFI, request for information, and we submitted our response to that request, but we haven’t heard anything more about that. We are aware of certain ideas about extending the ISAP program and the use of ankle monitors to heads of households. And that is possibly predicated on additional funding as well.

Okay. And anything new that you can point to on the state and the local level for new business?

I think there are states that are facing problems because of aging facilities in particular. I think most states are facing those kind of problems. And that means a combination of either consolidation of populations within larger facilities are actually building new facilities or leasing facilities for that purpose as we have done with clients in Oklahoma and New Mexico. So as time progresses, I think there will be more opportunities for us to market our idle facilities within those states that are facing those kinds of problems.

Okay. And one more for me. G&A was a little bit higher than we had expected in the quarter. Was there anything unusual in that? Or is that just seasonality?

This is Brian. That was just year-end true-up some professional fees and other things going on, nothing specific. We don’t expect in our guidance that, that run rate that occurred in the fourth quarter, so we assume a little bit lower run-rate going forward.

Great. Thanks for taking the questions. I’ll get back in queue.

Thank you.

Thank you. And our next question today comes from Brian Violino with Wedbush Securities. Please go ahead.

Great, tanks. Good morning. Nice quarter. Thanks for taking my questions. Just wanted to clarify some of the assumptions in the guidance. In the high end, you’re assuming it sounds like incremental funding increases. I’m just curious, could you talk to the volume of funding increase you’re baking into that high-end assumption? I’m assuming it’s nowhere near the numbers that the center was throwing out just given the numbers. And then does your midpoint guidance assume any incremental funding as well? I know that the low end doesn’t, but I’m curious about the mid end – midpoint, sorry.

This is Brian. The high end, as we said, is really only moderate. I don’t think it assumes significant additional funding. It assumes maybe there might be some reprogramming and ICE uses a few incremental more beds or slightly increases the participant count in ISAP. Remember, we said in the fourth quarter, we were in the 190,000 to 195,000 participant level. It’s down slightly from that currently. And then the low end is the same. It just assumes maybe some slight continued reduction in the ISAP participant counts, and then maybe some modest reduction if – right now, ICE is currently at 38,000 plus they’re funded for 34 supposedly. So maybe they go back down closer to the 34,000 or something like that, but nothing about like what George was talking about previously either on the upside or the downside.

Got it. Okay. And then in terms of these articles coming out recently about the reduction in detainees, do you think there’s any possibility I know it’s probably hard to tell that there could be an opportunity to move those detainees into ATD program, if there’s some incremental savings from the budget perspective?

That is a possibility. We are staffed up and scale up for that kind of policy change, if that’s so desired. The ISAP program has been talked about with respect to expanding it to other groups of individuals. And certainly, if there’s a desire to reduce detention beds and place those people under the ISAP monitoring program, we’re ready to assist in that policy change.

Okay, thanks. And last one for me. You saw a pretty nice uptick in your NOI margins across almost all your segments. Just wanted to get your view on the sustainability of those margins to 2024, is there anything seasonal or one-time on the operating expense line that we should be aware of that was benefiting you this quarter?

No. I think as the populations in our facilities as we talked about, has rebounded nicely, especially in our ICE facilities, but also to some degree in our Marshall facilities. And I think to the degree that, that holds going next year, we should be able to sustain that, except the first quarter is a little bit lower for the reasons that Shayn mentioned previously. There’s some seasonality as well as the impact of payroll-related taxes in the first quarter. So that will put a little bit of downward pressure.

Okay, great. Thank you.

Thank you. And our next question comes from Brendan McCarthy with Sidoti. Please go ahead.

Hey, good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. Just to follow-up on the potential release of the thousands of ICE detainees. I believe I saw there was a bed count number thrown out there, potentially bringing the number of beds funded down to around 22,000. I was just curious, is that number captured in the low end of the guidance range?

No. And just as a reminder, our facilities, as George was mentioning earlier have for the most part, all of our contracts, except for one, have fixed payment structure, which represents a significant component of the revenue. And when the ICE populations were lower historically during the COVID pandemic that protected significantly and enhanced or supported the predictability of our cash flow. So, while there would be some impact if they went that low, it would not be as significant as it might seem on a per bed basis. As George said, it may impact a few facilities where we are already above those guarantees, but at some of those facilities, those incremental per diems above the guarantees are lower. So, it would not be a dollar for dollar impact, if you will.

Got it. And is it safe to assume the only instance that may happen is if the government were to shutdown come March 8th or is that fair to assume?

No, I don’t think it would happen during that time. And I don’t sense that there is an immediate desire to do that. I think all likelihood is that people will await the results of the final budget decisions that will take place by the end of the first week of March.

Got it. And then I noticed in the fourth quarter, there was a nice jump in interest income. What drove that specifically?

That’s going to be predominantly higher interest rates by the end of the year plus some cash balances we have internationally.

Got it. Okay. And one last question from me. I have been reading into this speculated release and reporting management program, it sounds like something that ICE may try and rebrand the ATD program into from my research, but just wondering if you can provide some insight on the potential development of that program and whether you think ATD will somehow evolve into that?

I think there was a discussion about doing that, but we haven’t heard anything more as to whether those ideas have progressed.

Understood. That’s all for me. Thank you.

[Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from Kirk Ludtke with Imperial Capital. Please go ahead.

Hello everyone. Congratulations on the quarter. Thanks for the call.

Thank you.

Just a couple of follow-ups, you mentioned in your remarks that the Senate bill included $1.3 billion of funding for alternatives to detention. I was curious, did it break that down into how much of that would be allocated to ISAP?

No, it did not. And that was the original Senate bill. It’s not the one that passed, which was just the four need funding.

Correct, yes. I am just curious because it’s who knows it might – that type – some of that might show up in future proposals. So, I was curious. Changing topics for a second here on electronic monitoring, revenues were down year-over-year, but margins were remarkably stable. Can you talk about the cost structure in that business, or how are you able to maintain margins with such a meaningful year-over-year decline in revenues?

Sure. I mean I think a lot of it is just product mix and the products that we are using, some of those products we own outright and they are already mostly paid for and depreciated, so.

And we found some cost efficiency.

Yes. And during the year last year, we benefited from the full impact of those that were somewhat negotiated at the end of ‘22 and early ‘23 and that helped as well.

Got it. Thank you. That’s helpful. And then with respect to the – you mentioned the technology in that in ISAP is evolving. Can you talk about what you expect to happen with respect to the technology in that program and how it might impact margins and CapEx?

Well, all technologies, I think are obligated to continue to develop and evolve as our products, which presently include ankle monitors, phones and the new watches that we’ve developed. It’s called the VeriWatch. And we continue to think through replacements for those items in the future or replacements or inclusion of those monitoring mechanisms.

Okay. Thank you. Last call, you mentioned that county jails in Northern States were moving away from DHS and ICE and that might be an opportunity down the road, do you – I guess is there any way to put a range on that? How many beds you think might be in play this year?

It’s obviously going to depend on getting additional funding for ICE as we move through the fiscal year. And those opportunities are probably going to pop up in the second half of the year, assuming additional funding.

Got it. That’s helpful. Thank you. I appreciate it.

Thank you. And our next question comes from Greg Gibas with Northland Securities. Please go ahead.

Hi. Thanks guys. Congrats on the quarter. Thanks for taking the questions. I wanted to get a sense because I know we expected a little bit of a rebound in the second half of 2023 and ISAP participants that didn’t necessarily happen. And I just wanted to see if you had visibility on how those populations are expected to change or is it really stable or flat kind of the best assumption right now as we await more visibility from whether there is going to be government funding?

We really won’t know anything until the end of the first week of March. That’s the deadline for the existing continuing resolutions. And the funding for – the balance of the fiscal year will be determined by, I believe March 8th, unless there is the government shutdown of some sort, which we hope there is not.

Okay. That’s fair. Just wanted to see if you had any insight on whether that would change otherwise. I wanted to also ask, just with respect to your cost structure in 2024, any notable changes or variations on expenses relative to 2023 that are worth calling out, or is the cost structure going to be pretty steady comparatively?

I would say it’s going to be pretty steady comparatively. The biggest maybe line item change will be as we continue to reduce our debt, the interest expense year-over-year should be lower, I think what about, $20 million, $25 million. And that doesn’t – our guidance does not assume any benefit from any refinancing that may take place during the year as we discussed. We are looking at in the second half of the year at the latest at trying to redo or re-price or refinance the term loan. So, that could provide some additional benefit or upside.

Got it. I guess just last one, and I apologize if I missed this, but regarding sales, the potential sale of larger assets, has anything changed there in terms of interest levels or you might be able – the range of values that you could receive? Just curious if – I know that’s been something you have looked at the last several quarters. So, if there is anything different in terms of the potential sales of larger assets.

No. Our larger assets, what we have done is redeploy them through leases, most recently in Oklahoma and then a year or 2 years before that was New Mexico. Partly it’s driven from a state level by their funding issues and their budget issues and their ability to be able to make a large acquisition like that. So, I think it’s probably likely that it’s more preferable from their perspective to lease than to buy, but we will continue to look at both if it makes sense.

Okay. Thanks guys.

Thank you. And ladies and gentlemen, this concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to George Zoley for any closing remarks.

Thank you for joining us on this call. We look forward to addressing you on the next call.

Thank you, sir. This concludes today’s conference call. We thank you all for attending today’s presentation. You may now disconnect your lines and have a wonderful day.