Welcome to the Globus Medical Third Quarter Fiscal 2020 Earnings Call. At this time, all lines will be on mute and the question-and-answer session will be held after the prepared remarks. I will now turn the call over to Brian Kearns, Senior Vice President of Business Development and Investor Relations. Mr. Kearns, please go ahead.

Thank you, Chanel, and thank you, everyone, for being with us today. Joining today's call from Globus Medical will be Dave Demski, President and CEO; Dan Scavilla, Executive Vice President, Chief Commercial Officer; and Keith Pfeil, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. This review is being made available via webcast accessible through the Investor Relations section of the Globus Medical website at www.globusmedical.com. Before we begin, let me remind you that some of the statements made during this review are or may be considered forward-looking statements. Our Form 10-K for the 2019 fiscal year and our subsequent filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission identify certain factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those projected in any forward-looking statements made today. Our SEC filings, including the 10-K, are available on our website. We do not undertake to update any forward-looking statements as a result of new information or future events or developments. Our discussion today will also include certain financial measures that are not calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles or GAAP. We believe these non-GAAP financial measures provide additional information pertinent to our business performance. These non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered replacements for and should be read together with the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures. Reconciliations to the most directly comparable GAAP measures are available on the schedules accompanying the press release and on the Investor Relations section of the Globus Medical website. With that, I'll now turn the call over to Dave Demski, our President and CEO.

Thank you, Brian, and good afternoon, everyone. I'm very excited to report record revenue, record non-GAAP EPS and outstanding adjusted EBITDA for Q3. Not only are we seeing a healthy bounce back in surgical procedures, we are taking market share and growing. Revenue for the quarter was $216 million, up 10% from Q3 '19. Musculoskeletal Solutions increased by 14%, led by our U.S. spinal implant business, which grew at a stellar 17% in Q3. The revenue from enabling technologies was $9 million, up 66% sequentially compared to Q2, but down by $5 million compared to Q3 '19. To give some perspective on the enabling technology results, the third quarter is traditionally the slowest quarter for capital sales. However, last year, we grew by 125% in the third quarter and posted $14 million in revenue, tying our highest quarter for the year. Given these challenging comps, the sequential improvement is more indicative of the health of this part of our business. As the economy opened back up in Q3, our capital teams were able to begin rebuilding our pipelines and moving deals along. Many of these deals closed in October, and we have actually sold more robots in October than we did for all of Q3. Non-GAAP EPS was $0.49 per share, up 15% from Q3 '19, matching the best quarter in our history. Adjusted EBITDA was also a healthy 35% for the quarter. These results highlight the lean, efficient operating philosophy built into our business. Our profitability was somewhat inflated in Q3 due to issues unique to the pandemic, such as limited travel, the elimination of the most peer-to-peer cadaveric educational activities and the change in industry conference participation to virtual events. On the flip side, the results also reflect continued investments in and trauma, which resulted in a drag…

Thanks, Dave, and good afternoon, everyone. Though we continue to navigate through uncertain times, Globus delivered an exceptional third quarter performance demonstrating strong market share growth, while seeing a return of elective procedures. As we progress through the pandemic, we remain focused on competitive recruiting and onboarding and continued investment in R&D to drive new and exciting product launches, the contributions from those new products and a focused approach to selling our Excelsius robot. These objectives, coupled with our focus on execution, have proven successful and are evident in our Q3 results. We remain well positioned to continue driving above-market share gains as we look to the future. Overall, our Q3 revenue was $216.1 million, an increase of 10.1% as reported, with the same number of selling days in the U.S. and international, but one less selling day in Japan. Third quarter net income was $44.2 million, up 15.4% over the prior year third quarter. Non-GAAP net income was $49.1 million, driving $0.49 of fully diluted earnings per share, representing 14.9% growth over the prior year. Adjusted EBITDA was 34.8%, and our free cash flow was $35.9 million. Turning our attention to sales. Our third quarter U.S. revenue was $182.1 million or 11.9% higher than the third quarter of 2019, driven by the strong bounce back of U.S. spine partially offset by lower INR sales due to the lingering impacts of COVID-19. Our U.S. spinal implant business showed great momentum in the quarter and continues to drive above-market growth as we drive further penetration. International revenue for the third quarter was $34 million, higher by 1.4% over the prior year quarter. The performance of our spinal implant business varied by region, showing strong growth within Spain, Australia, Germany and Italy; however, we continue to see ongoing COVID impacts in Japan,…

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Matt Miksic with Crédit Suisse. Your line is open.

Can you hear me okay?

Yes, Matt.

Congrats on a really strong quarter given the environment for lots of reasons. If you could maybe just give us a sense of what the tone of -- it sounds like a robot purchases are accelerating here a little bit. Sort of what's the tone and the type of interest that you're getting in that channel? Anything you could tell us of how that's evolved, say, since the summertime and into here in October, when it seems like things are picking up. And then I had one follow-up.

Yes. Thanks, Matt. I think I would characterize it as strong, certainly strong interest, if you go back kind of to our history with this technology, when we first bought it, it was a huge amount of skepticism most surgeons thought I'll never use something like that. It started to grow where there was interest in sort of tire kickers and then the early adopters. And I feel like we're switching over, we're about on the verge where it's becoming -- the question is, when am I going to adopt this in my practice? It's becoming much more mainstream and common, not that people have done that yet, but the attitude of surgeons is well beyond the skepticism we saw early, and they're interested in understanding how we can benefit them and coming at it with that perspective. So the pipeline is really strong right now. A lot of interest and we really haven't experienced a ton of impact due to COVID in terms of closing them. So it's really encouraging.

That's great. And then I guess the other is -- and you probably spent a fair amount of time talking about this, maybe this today, tonight and the next week or so, at least, is just what, if anything, in terms of the tone of procedures looks like? Things were encouraging and from June to July and seemed encouraging into maybe August and September. And then now we see what we see all over the news and folks are a little bit more concerned about the prospect beginning cases done or whatever might happen in the next couple of months. Anything that you can call out as to what you're seeing or what maybe your surgeons are expecting over the next several months, maybe even as it pertains to what we learned back in August, July and August in some of the areas that were under some heightened pressure would be helpful.

Yes. Good question. I mean we -- our results in the third quarter really are reflective of the fact that we've seen rolling shutdowns of electives in various pockets throughout the country, even in Q3. San Antonio was down for a little bit. We do a lot of business in Charleston, South Carolina. There are parts of that were shut down. They've come back on hearing reports, like flagstaff was down a couple of weeks ago. So it's there are pockets. We're not seeing that massive across the board shut down of electives, and they're coming back much quicker as well. So our business has actually grown in October. We had the best week of our -- in our history last week as a company in the U.S. So even in spite of these rolling shutdowns, the volumes out there are very strong. And I think that, coupled with the fact that we're growing as a company is produced through the results we continue to see even into last week and this week.

Our next question comes from Shagun Singh with Wells Fargo. Your line is open.

I'm wondering if you guys can give us a little more color on the growth rate you may be seeing in October. I know you mentioned that you're up at any incremental color there. And then I'm just curious if you can talk a little bit about the imaging platform. You were to make the submission in Q4 with expected launch in Q1 '21. I'm just wondering, are you guys on track and should we expect a limited or a full launch once you commercialize?

Thanks, Shagun. No specifics on October, we're having a great month. Just put it that way, which as I talked to Matt about, we're seeing strong surgical volumes in the U.S. from an implant side. And clearly, we had a good month when it comes to robots. In terms of the imaging system, yes, we're on track. We're actually very happy with the final touches of the verification, validation activities and the various tests that it has to pass. We're in the final throes of that where we expect to file with FDA in November. And it's up to them, but we expect that we'd be able to launch this in Q1. I don't think you'll see much revenue impact in Q1. And as we ramp our production, even the first half of the year will be a little bit muted, but we think this could have a significant impact in the second half of next year.

That's helpful. And then if I could just squeeze in one other additional question. Could you just discuss your initial thoughts on the corporate tax reform under a likely Biden administration and what should we expect? And how do you expect to offset the impact?

Thanks, Shagun. I mean, at this point, I really have no comment on that. Our view is that if there is a change in corporate tax due to an administration change, it's going to affect the market as a whole and we will deal with that at the appropriate time.

Our next question comes from David Lewis with Morgan Stanley. Your line is open.

Just a couple for me here. I guess the first maybe for Dave, for you, I mean, the U.S. traction the last quarter and this, again, this quarter is pretty substance. I just wondering if you can give us some more granularity on what you think is driving that? I know we have COVID recovery, but it's pretty clear the momentum you built last year is sort of return this year and it does appear that you're taking share. So I sort of wondered if you could kind of flush out new products, rep acquisition, lower attrition, what has sort of accelerated, what looks like a kind of a share capture situation these last six months for you? And then I had a couple of follow-up for Keith.

Sure, David. Well, you hit it a couple of major factors. First of all, we've had some great product introductions this year. We're getting a lot of traction from our HEDRON line or 3D spacers. SABLE is our -- I think is our fourth generation of expandable T lift device. That's been going extremely well. We saw resonate, which is our new cervical plate tick off this quarter. Combine that with the growing base of robots out there, I mean, each one produces some pull through, but as we've got this large installed base, there's some momentum behind that. And then our recruiting and onboarding, and I separate that into two buckets, right, recruiting is just getting the folks hired onboarding is the process that our folks go about like trying to convert that business. While the rep is on his non-compete, our folks around him have to do that. And then as they come off their non-competes either at 12 months or 18 months, that's when we'll see a significant growth as well. So, you're seeing the combination of all those things occurring and really being executed quite well by our U.S. sales team. So, it's all of the above.

Okay, very helpful. And then, Keith, I appreciate the margin commentary you gave us for next year. I wonder if you could just help us kind of underpin your confidence in sort of getting to those margin numbers, which are materially up over 2019. And maybe you could help us, I mean, numbers clearly have you growing double digits to '21 over '19 and any granularity you can provide in terms of how we should be thinking about U.S. trends? Obviously, ex-U.S. is probably going to be a little more sluggish. Any focus you can give us on the top or bottom line for next year other than margins would be very, very helpful?

Yes. Thanks for the question. I'll talk a little bit about margins. We've talked before about Globus being in the 33% to 37% range for EBITDA. This quarter, we landed to I did call out that we had a little bit of a tailwind because of some travel and training in SG&A, but we did a little bit of a headwind in COGS because of that higher inventory reserve. Assuming that we go into next year and have normal sales or what I would say, sales not impacted by COVID, I'm pretty comfortable that we're going to be in that 33% to 37% range. But I would still caution that I don't want to give a specific number at this point. But as we landed this quarter, to me, points to a bright feature as we move ahead. As I look up into gross margin as we move ahead and continue to drive penetration in the U.S. market, the profitability on those U.S. sales will help drive incremental dollars dropping to the bottom line, which helps the overall story because you're going to get leverage on your fixed cost. But at the same time, you're going to see continued investment in depreciation or city investment in sets. This is going to drive additional depreciation expense. So as I look ahead, I still feel good about a mid-70s gross profit in a non-COVID environment or in sales that aren't impacted by COVID.

Our next question comes from Ryan Zimmerman with BTIG. Your line is open.

This is actually Max on for Ryan. Just wanted to go back to the pull-through aspect of robotic deployments, and in the past, and today, you talked about how, as the installed base grows, we should see Porto grow kind of exponentially. Just wondering if you can provide some more detail around the efficiencies and pull-through you saw in the third quarter as a result of already having robotic systems in place? And then just kind of thinking, moving ahead, if you think about an exponential pull-through graph, say, is there a certain number of placements where you think pull-through takes off? And if so, do you kind of have a good sense of when we could possibly -- or when you could possibly hit that milestone?

Yes. Thanks, Matt. Probably not going to be able to help you out much on the analytics there. Just conceptually, as we sell a robot, they work much more efficiently. The cases go much better with our screws. So that right there creates some pull through. We also have done deals where there's an implant purchase component to the deal. So that is a built-in structural factor. And then long term, as we see surgeons adopt the technology, the hope there and our strategic goal is to get their partners and the other folks operating in that hospital to utilize the robot as well. And potentially pull their implant business along with the surgeon champion who usually -- there's usually one or two surgeons who champion the purchase of the robot, but there's oftentimes several surgeons operating in the hospital. So that's been our focus of late is to drive that adoption, make sure it's a good launch in terms of the folks that bought it, and that gives us the basis then to go after other surgeons. Don't really have any analytical or numbers to share with you from that impact, but I can tell you that -- it's there, and it's part of the reason for our growth.

Got it. And then switching topics a little bit. I'm going to go back to HEDRON and Sable again. And just trying to get a sense of how much demand you weren't able to fill in the third quarter. And whether or not you can provide any detail around what that potential impact would have been to the top line? And then you had your increased manufacturing capacity come online in the fourth quarter. Will you be able to backfill any of these orders? I'm just trying to get a sense of whether or not we could see a Bolus of revenue from these products in the fourth quarter and/or early 2021.

Yes. You're probably not going to see it in the fourth quarter that the capacity is coming online. In November, and we really can't get products actually made and through the whole process and sterilize until late in the quarter. So I don't think you're going to see a big incremental impact from Q3 to Q4, but that should be in place next year. There really is no opportunity to backfill the orders. Those cases are done. Those surgeries have been performed and the patients are hopefully home and doing well. So we just have to focus on the future. Give you some quantitative metrics, we're doubling our capacity. So we expect to double what we can sell as we go forward. And clearly, if we have more traction than that, we'll continue to add capacity as we see it.

Our next question comes from Matthew O'brien with Piper Sandler. Your line is open.

This is Patrick on for Matt. We really appreciate you taking the time and answering our questions. I wanted to look at robotics to start. I found it really interesting. Last quarter, you kind of talked about the spectrum for capital. And it seems like a lot of the work, you have a ton of surgeon interest, which is really great. But you mentioned there's certain hospitals who -- they just don't have the time to speak with you because they're impacted by coronavirus. At the same time, you have hospitals who really want to differentiate themselves, get that Excelsius in and take advantage of the situation. I'm just curious if you could kind of expand on the dynamics you're seeing in that marketplace right now? Are things shifting more towards hospitals wanting to differentiate themselves or some of those customers willing to talk to you? Any color there would be appreciated. Then I have a quick follow-up.

Sure, Patrick. We're gaining more access. I mean, that's really the message is in Q3, we were shut down from face-to-face interactions, which we attempted to stay in front of folks as best we could virtually, but that just wasn't that effective in terms of really cementing their interest and getting them to go forward with executives to purchase the equipment. So I think now that we're able to be in front of folks, as I mentioned to one of the earlier callers, the tone has changed a little bit towards how is this going to help my practice versus I don't need it. And the skepticism that we saw in the early days, I think it's not only us. It's the fact that we have competition out there that are also extolling the benefits of robotic surgery. We have like striker with Mako really driving the use of robotics in orthopedics. So I think that general tone has really changed, and I think will continue to change as we get more and more systems out there. It's just going to become the way surgery is done. And at that point, the battle is who's got the best system, who can offer the most advantages, and I feel good about where we stand competitively.

Our next question comes from Richard Newitter with SVB Leerink. Your line is open.

And congrats on the quarter in a challenging environment. I just want to sure I heard correctly, I think you said that you're on track to grow on a total consolidated revenue basis for 2020. And if that's the case, especially since you said that you expect growth in enabling technologies in 4Q relative to last year, I'm just curious would that -- that implies a double-digit trend sustaining for total revenue growth in 4Q of this year? Is that the underlying assumption there? That the U.S. continues at this mid-to high-teens level? Or is there a pickup in international to kind of get there? I'm just curious what the embedded expectation is you're going to continue to grow double digits, and in fact, potentially accelerate on a total revenue basis?

Hey, Rich, thanks. Just to clarify, so we're on track in the U.S. to achieve year-to-date growth, the U.S. implants, actually by the end of this week and the end of October. It's a goal to grow consolidated for the years. So I would not say that we're on track for that, but I think we have a really good shot at it. We really haven't sliced and diced where those components are coming from. But on an overall basis, we believe that, that's achievable, and we're certainly working hard to get there.

Okay. But based on the trend that you're saying is strengthening seemingly in October. There's nothing else equal to suggest that you wouldn't at least be stable in the U.S. core spine business, if not better, on the implant side, all else equal for the rest of the quarter, correct?

Our U.S. spine business is really strong right now. We have a great October. I haven't gone back and said, what we did last October. So I don't have the growth numbers in my mind. But I can tell you sequentially and qualitatively, we had -- we're having a really good month. So I'm expecting enabling to grow for the quarter given the strong start in the pipeline that we have. How it all shakes out into each piece? I'm not sure what those growth rates are.

Okay. That's helpful. And then just I think someone got at this in an earlier question. I just want to take your fulfill it kind of the market improvement in the U.S. versus what you're doing better than others and share gains? Could you give us a sense what you think the normalized kind of spine market growth rate is right now relative to your kind of 17%, you're clearly taking share. What how much does the market potentially just pick up from some of the backlog work down and maybe be shaped recovery versus just purely Globus specific issues that are benefiting you?

Yes. I really don't know where to draw that line. Both are occurring. We certainly saw a nice bounce back in procedures overall. So it would be interesting to see how the other folks report on that. But we're all -- I know that we're taking market share. We just don't have the granularity in our systems to differentiate those 2. So -- sorry, that can't be more helpful.

Okay. And actually, maybe one last one. Biologics, I think you called out low teens growth for that business. I know that had been a business that was pressured due to some product disruption issues in the past. What was the growth rate last quarter? And is that a good trajectory for that business going forward?

I don't know the quarter -- the growth rate last quarter. We didn't comment on it. We saw some things resolved this quarter. That's why we called it out. And frankly, we have some more opportunities in front of us. So I'm hopeful 2021 will be even better as we resolve some of the outstanding issues.

Our next question comes from Matt Taylor with UBS. Your line is open.

So I guess I just wanted to focus again on the robotics pickup here. It's a little surprising, frankly, given the environment. Do you think any of the enhancements that you're working on are helping to separate you from competitors? Or do you think this is more of a demand for overall robotics? I'd love to hear about how those enhancements could be playing into the yes.

Yes, I do think the enhancements are helping us sell robots, not only the enhancements, but just the longer we get out there, I think it's established that our our programs are operating at a really high level. There's a lot of adoption. Surgeons are really seeing value in the technology. I'm not sure that's always true for our competition. So that's also a factor. I can't really speak to what the overall market is doing, but I know that as we get into head-to-head evaluations from a technology, usability, functionality standpoint, we consistently grade out as much better than the other alternatives.

And I was hoping you could offer some thoughts on the outlook for your trauma business. I imagine it's harder to break into some hospitals when the environment is like you do have some momentum going now. Do you think that could continue to back up? And what are the gating factors for trauma to become a bigger part of your business?

Thanks. I appreciate the question. We did have record sales in Q3. And what's promising with that is over half of that growth came from new surgeons, while COVID is certainly taxing the VAT committees and allowing new products and selling is down somewhat we're getting the right traction, the right approach. I think we all remain bullish on the investment and see growth coming out of trauma through the rest of this year and certainly into 2021. Again, certainly hindered by some of the COVID activity, but offset again by strong recruiting that still continues with us.

Our next question comes from Kyle Rose with Canaccord. Your line is open.

So I kind of want to stick on the robot theme here and maybe less what you're seeing, I guess, year-to-date, but talk more about the future. So you've just recently launched the interbody module, you're going to submit the imaging platform at year-end and launch that next year. I guess, just help us understand what the addition of the imaging platform does from your enabling strategy and then how we should think about the next steps of innovation across robotics?

Sure, Kyle. The imaging component really if you think about computer-assisted spine surgery, you have two components. One would be just navigation. So pre-hand navigation, where you're using 3D images combined with navigation to track where you are in the case. And then robotics is the next evolution where you're using the robot to guide the instruments to do the procedure. We've been competing in the robotics space, clearly, but there's a strong installed base of pure navigators and not all of you experienced a lot of benefit from going from freehand to navigated. So we want to be -- we want to -- we're really expanding our portfolio to be able to address the navigators, if you will, who are not ready to make the move into robotics. And that's a pretty substantial segment. So it just gives us one more tool to address that overall computer-assisted group. And I think as you look forward, I don't think we've really unveiled much of what we're working on beyond imaging and navigation. I think we've talked about the fact that we're working on a robot to help do Total knee and then ultimately, total hips. That will be probably the next thing on the horizon. And then -- and we do have a couple of other projects, but we're not ready to unveil those just yet. We're focused more on the next steps, which will be the imaging system, the navigation that goes along with that and then the cranial rollout.

Great. I appreciate that additional color there. And you talked the last couple of quarters, just about some of the encouraging metrics you're seeing from a utilization side and the pull-through on the robots. You also talked about focused more on utilization with the implant sales team. Can you maybe talk about how that focus with the implant sales teams has evolved over the course of the past several years is just the fact that you've got enough systems in place that now you can have the implant guys call on it? Or is there something different about the sales process that you're seeing evolve?

So it's not the sales process so much. We just -- we still have a capital team that works together with our implant teams to follow through on the capital sale. It's really once that robot gets installed, we want the implant team to own the day-to-day operation of it as they become experts in how that technology benefits surgeons under patients, they become more effective in converting the surgeon -- the competitive surgeon down the hall who doesn't use our implants uses the robotic technology and the advantages that, that brings. To convert that surgeon over to using that robot, which means they're going to use our implants as well.

Our next question comes from Taylor Crumb with Securities [ph]. Your line is open.

And congrats on the quarter. So we're getting asked, I think, quite a bit about 2021, and just any guidelines or commentary you guys can provide going forward would be helpful. I mean a lot of companies, I think, are looking at 2019 as sort of a baseline or normal year. And right now, The Street is modeling mid-teens growth off of that 2019 level for you guys in 2021 is that sort of a reasonable place to be? Or is there anything else we should be considering as we look into next year?

Thanks for the question. This is Keith. As we think about 2021, I think it's really premature to be discussing where we think we're going to land. We really want to get through this quarter. Some of the news that came out today regarding cases rising across Europe and concerns that it's going to come over to the U.S. I think given that, I would like to get through this next quarter. And as we get to 2021, if we're in a position to give guidance, give guidance at that point.

Great. And then just a couple on the enabling tech business, I mean it sounds to me like you guys are on track right now to deliver a record quarter in the robotics segment. So I guess I just want to understand sort of the durability of the momentum you're seeing in October. I mean, could this be a $15 million to $20 million quarter for the enabling tech business? And then just a follow-up on the imaging system, I mean, it sounds like you guys are expecting to launch in the first quarter. Just would love to understand how you're thinking about the launch strategy and just compare, contrast it with what you saw when you launched Excelsius? Because I think, Dave, you made a good point that docs were super skeptical, I think when you first launched the robot. So I think I would love a little bit more clarity on both those items.

Sure, Kayla. Well, we did 14 million in the fourth quarter last year, and we're going to -- we expect to be more than that. That's probably all I can share with you on where we expect to land this quarter. And in terms of the imaging system, yes, that's a much different launch than it was really evangelical sale when we got out there with ExcelsiusGPS. But the imaging system is really targeted at an installed base of navigators. The robotics is really expanding the pie, if you will, for computer assisted, where we're going after that installed base with the imaging system. So we'll be focused on big installations there. And walking through with the surgeons, the advantages that our technology has over what they're using today, which as we've been able to preview it a little bit and get some feedback from our design teams and some of the showings we've had in ASK, those advantages seem to be very compelling. There's a lot of excitement and a lot of anticipation of the launch.

Our next question comes from Jason Mit with Northland Securities. Your line is open.

First off, I don't know if it's possible to quantitate the COVID impact in the quarter. I mean first off, was there any at all in the U.S.? And you did point out some of the OUS, but I'd love to see what -- how you guys quantitate that?

I'm not sure, I understand when you say the impact…

I'm just curious, if you look at procedure volumes and if you look at your accounts, is there a way of kind of understanding what the range of potential of COVID impact was this quarter?

Analytically, no, we don't have the ability to sort of differentiate between whether that was a patient that was supposed to be operated on in May or one that came in last week. But I can tell you anecdotally, we've certainly got to bounce back. We -- as we alluded to last quarter, we started seeing a real uptick in procedural volume really June, and then that continued through the entire third quarter, which is kind of unusual from a seasonality standpoint. So clearly, those -- a lot of that activity was because of the bounce back from the second quarter. But I can say, at the same time, I know from our recruiting and our new products, the information we gather on that that we're getting new surgeons and new customers. So it's both. But we don't have the ability to tell you which piece is growth and which is the market. So I think as the other folks report, as the bigger companies report, you guys will get a sense for that overall growth and how market shares have shifted.

Okay. That's helpful. And then on the recruiting side, I mean, that is a big driver or one of the pieces on your driving success here. Obviously, you continued at a record pace. I think you've hinted it in the last couple of quarters that it seems like where you pull from, which is the larger companies in general, there's a lot of excitement to come up with Globus, for a variety of reasons. I wonder, though, it sounds like the pace is continuing. Do you sense that your larger competitors are pulling back at all? And as I look across the landscape as well, do you have a sense of whether other companies are trying to step up recruiting efforts or actually pulling back given the uncertainty?

No, I think everybody is recruiting. I think the advantage we have is the technology that we have, the implant technology, which we've been a leader in for 17 or 18 years. And now you couple that with our enabling platform, the success we've had in robotics, the imaging system coming. I think perhaps we're just excited about selling new technology. It gives them ability to grow, to grow their business and they're in common they're influenced. So they want to come to a company that has great technology. So, I don't think it's the fact that we recruit, I think it's just the tools we have to recruit with.

Okay. And then just last quick question. NASS was kind of online and not getting a lot of attention. Is there any new product 3D launches that you had during NASS that you think are worth highlighting the likely drive 2021?

No, I don't think we rolled anything out at NASS. So, we're focused on those 3D printed cages that we alluded to earlier. The new cervical plate is doing really well, stable. We've got a couple more things we're trying to get out by the end of this year. But we're always, at any time, we have 20 or 30 projects in development in spine alone. So we've, over the years, established just a continuous pipeline of innovation.

Our next question comes from Steven Lichtman with Oppenheimer. Your line is open.

We were just wondering if you could provide maybe some more color on what you're seeing in terms of patient flow today versus pre-COVID. Last quarter, I think you called out an average of about 85% of pre-COVID levels. Has that returned to 100% at all during 3Q and looking ahead do you see the increasing shift of procedures to ASCs offsetting any downturns?

Yes. Thanks, Steve. We gather that information last quarter because we knew that was a significant question on folks' minds, and it's not part of our normal analytics. So we did not update it. So I really can't provide more color on it. I know our volumes continue to be strong. So I assume that means the clinic flow is adequate and potentially strong. And in terms -- I think your second question was about ASCs. I didn't quite hear it all. So maybe you could repeat it.

Yes. I was just wondering if the increasing shift of procedures to ASCs, could that potentially offset any future downturns if the buyers has more of a Resurgence in the fall/winter time line?

Certainly and we saw that the first time around. There was some shift into ASCs for the easier cases, but they can't really do the complex stuff in the ASC. So if we have a big country-wide kind of shutdown that we saw in the past will be impacted. As I spoke about earlier, what we're seeing now are the sporadic smaller, less duration kind of shutdowns, which have not impacted us to the extent that we saw back in the second quarter.

Okay, great. That's helpful. Just one quick follow-up on the progress in trauma. Any color you can provide on how many reps you have in the field currently? And any new products in 2021 that we should be focused on?

This is Keith. I actually don't have any comment on that in terms of the number of reps. We just -- we're going to continue to recruit and add to our business as we move forward and continue to watch it grow sequentially and year-over-year.

[Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from Matthew Blackman with Stifel. Your line is open.

I just wanted to actually start on international, where it looks like you're back to roughly pre-COVID revenue levels. Can you help us think through how that business tracks back towards pre-COVID growth rates? And I appreciate that the resurgence of the case is a confounder, but beyond COVID, are there specific items you need to execute on to get you back to sustainable double-digit growth.

Beyond COVID, we just -- we have to do the things that we've always done to be successful, which starts with technology, getting our best technology in front of surgeons, hiring reps, having to make sure we have a strong sales force and a good representation. And then as we've added in the last several years is driving the enabling technology, which has frankly been surprisingly strong. When we first got into this, I was concern that the price tag would be prohibitive for some of the international markets, but we haven't really seen that. We've seen strong demand and really around the world and the placements have been really encouraging. And we have approval in Japan now, which is our largest international market, and we're hopeful that we can get a system or two installed in the fourth quarter. Certainly a lot of interest there and that will be a big opportunity for us going forward.

I appreciate that. And then my last question. You were sort of asked this on trauma. I'd ask it again a little bit differently. It's just thinking through sort of the biggest gating factors left to tackle. When I think about it, obviously, there are multiple elements here is the portfolio. It's hiring, training and set deployment. I'm sure there are others. But are there any one or two that as you look out over the next 12 months out of that list or others that you would have us think about as being sort of the most important and how we should think about them evolving again, over the next -- and you pick the time frame, 12 months, 24 months?

Well, I think you picked most of the points, but we'll go at 12 months from now. Right now, it's going to be about expanding the footprint through feet on the street. So recruiting and taking the existing pipeline that we have will be key. At the same time, gaining access and additional access into the accounts where we're in and getting more procedures with the sets we have. That will become the majority of growth and drivers for us in the first 12 months. The second 12 months are getting up to a 24-month question. It's going to be a continued expansion of the portfolio to where we can meaningfully displace existing competition with our full portfolio. That's really what the second wave will come in, while we continue to expand feet on The Street and gain access.

With no further questions, I will now conclude the Globus Medical Third Quarter 2020 Earnings Release Conference Call. Thank you all for joining us. You may now disconnect.