Thank you for joining Gold Resource Corporation’s Third Quarter 2016 Conference Call. Mr. Jason Reid, CEO, will be hosting today’s call. Following Mr. Reid’s opening remarks, there will be a question-and-answer period. As a reminder, today’s call is being recorded. Please go ahead, Mr. Reid.

Thank you. Good morning, everyone. And thank you for joining Gold Resource Corporation’s 2016 third quarter conference call. I expect this to be a relatively short conference call with my comments running approximately 15 minutes followed by a Q&A. Joining me on the call today for the Q&A portion will be Mr. John Labate, our Chief Financial Officer. Let me remind everyone that certain statements made on this call are not historical facts and are considered forward-looking statements. These statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties as described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and other SEC filings, which could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by our comments. Forward-looking statements in the earnings release that we issued yesterday, along with the comments on this call are made only as of today, November 3, 2016, and we undertake no obligation to publicly update any of these forward-looking statements as actual events unfold. You can find a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures referred to in our remarks in our Form 10-Q filed with the SEC for the quarter ended September 30, 2016. The third quarter of 2016 was another good quarter, operationally with net income of $1.6 million or $0.03 per share for the quarter, now totaling $0.15 for the first nine months of 2016. We added $4 million to our cash and cash equivalents account, now totaling over $17 million when compared to $13 million the previous quarter. It was a very exciting and positive quarter regarding our M&A activity in which we acquired two, high-grade properties in Nevada’s Walker Lane mineral belt with the Isabela Pearl development project and the Mina Gold exploration property, both adding critical mass to our Nevada mining unit and both are viewed as potential open…

Thank you. [Operator Instructions]

While we are waiting, in case, there are calls, I would like to read a email question that came in from Robert Anderson. His question is, please explain while in Q2 GORO made $0.10 on $26.2 million in revenue, while in Q3 was $21.4 million, and we only made $0.03 a share. In addition, the average price of the metals were up considerably, so the net per tonne should be up as well. Thank you, Robert. Robert, thank you for you call. I’m going to return this question over to John and then, I’ll weigh in on it is well.

Thanks Jason. Q3 was a good quarter but Q2 was an extremely good quarter from an income statement point of view, and it benefited from a couple of things. One, depending upon where we’re in deposit, grades can vary significantly. And in Q2 grades for gold and silver were up tremendously. Gold was almost 3.5 grams. So, we benefited from significantly higher production. Production of gold was 10,000 ounces in Q2 and 6,000 in Q3. And that additional production fell almost directly to the bottom line in Q2. Additionally, Q2 production cost benefited from the recently enacted diesel credit in Mexico that contributed $1.7 million in Q2; in Q3, the associated number was 600,000. And that’s primarily because we had a catch-up in Q2, because it was recently enacted and the methodology had just been determined in Q2. So, while Q3 was good, Q2 was unusually good because of those factors.

Thanks John. Yes, as he mentioned and I just want to reiterate as John mentioned, grade is the driver in large part on quarter-on-quarter variables. And as John mentioned, the second quarter grade was better than the third. As has been the case and will always continue to be the case, grade will vary quarter-on-quarter, depending on where we are in the deposit. It’s one of the reasons why we’re so excited to get the Switchback. Anybody who has looked at our corporate presentation and looked at the drill results slide or just being pay attention and watching our press releases, the gold grade at Switchback is great, not that the Arista isn’t but the gold by all indications could see a bump. So, we’re very excited that A, we’re now developing a Switchback. And as we start over time pulling tonnes from there that will also impact the grade, which in turn impacts all these variables that address your question. So hopefully, Robert, that answered your question. We appreciate you writing that in. And operator, are there any questions on the line?

Yes, we will take our first phone question. Please go ahead, caller.

Hi, Jason. My name is Mark Smith. I call into these pretty regularly and a shareholder. What a head spinner of a good quarter as far as the good news is coming out, appreciate your long, view vision for development and in this Company. So, I have about three questions, should be pretty quick. Did I hear you say that you will likely finish the low grade stockpile open pit processing by the end of the year or somewhere there about?

That’s correct. Basically, what we’re doing is we’re pushing that to the flotation circuit. So, we actually stop running Arista and then we only run open pit for a couple of days, the flotation circuit. And so, depending on how many days in the month we do that, dictates how quickly we’ll go to that open pit stockpile. There is a chance we’ll be done with that open pit stockpile by year-end. The net effect, as I mentioned on this call and have mentioned in chat emphasized with our shareholders, that lowers the overall grade. I mean we are dealing with a much higher graded ungrounded Arista and it’s a poly metallic situation with high grade gold, silver, copper, lead and zinc. The open pit is just gold, very little silver and no base metals. So, it does degrade a bit the average grades anyway for the quarter . So, yes, there is a good chance we’ll be done, at the end of the quarter, with the stockpile. Now, having said that too, we've gone back and we’re finding some extensions to the open pit. As we've mentioned in the past, we are considering chasing those but we've also been able to pull a little bit of tones from the bottom of the open pit, not a lot and it won't be a lot but those -- whenever we're running open pit though, it's going to lower the grade.

Okay. Secondly, the sale price for the silver was 20.79 that you indicated in your report. Was that after the byproducts corrections?

Okay. Say that question again. I believe...

The 20.79 sale price of silver, was that after byproduct credits?

No, I think you are referring -- that was just the average realized price of silver that we sold for the quarter, just silver, no credits in that. The credits kick in when you are talking about cash cost and we apply base metal credits to that number. But the silver number I referred to, and John correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe that's just the average realized price.

That is. And part of that there was a very high price for the quarter. We sell, as you know, our concentrates on a provisional basis, and some of the pricing goes out as far as two months. So, some of the second quarter sliver sales were finalized in Q3 and we got the benefit of the higher prices in early Q3. And that's what has driven that higher average realized price.

Okay. So that drives me to my next question, which is the Shanghai Gold Exchange versus the COMEX selling endpoint. I noticed that the Shanghai Gold Exchange price for silver was as high as $0.80 per ounce higher even last week and it was $0.59 yesterday. And does your end market -- is that, are you using the Shanghai Gold Exchange now?

No, we are not. The Shanghai Gold Exchange is fairly new and it is making waves. And as you are referring to, the prices are higher. All we can hope for is they start pushing to true price discovery and we will see higher metal prices, which should translate into our benchmarks. But no, our current contract does not account for the Shanghai Gold price.

I'd like to urge you then as a shareholder that to look into exploiting that up to $0.70 to $0.80 an ounce on silver. And then that leads me to my next question. Is it still too early then to say what the estimate grade and tonnage will be for Alta Gracia, is that correct?

We have some initial grade estimates and it's on the presentation on our corporate website. But, keep in mind that the approach we have being trucking or to a strategically located mill, enables us to view all the rest of the properties in our 55-kilometer structural corridor with the lens of all we have to do is justify mining and trucking costs. And as soon as we can do that and make money, we can move forward. So, we've taken a look at Alta Gracia and it’s got some old historic mine workings or quite a few actually, and the particular one we are chasing is called Mirador. It's an old mine in which they’ve left a lot of pillars, lot of stopes and there some untouched mineral at back end of this mine. And again, you can see some of the sections, longitudinal sections of that on our corporate website. So, we do have estimates but those estimates are just hey, we have reached the threshold to move forward and make money here. So, that’s what we are doing. As we develop it, as we -- as it start spinning off cash flow, we want it to fund itself and help drill, exploration, drill itself, and further define the resource and hopefully expand upon that and doing so, see a higher grade as well. But we have some initial estimates on that.

Okay, I'll refer to your website then on that. But, keep going. And you are doing a great job, Jason. I appreciate you.

Mark, I appreciate the call. And I just want to emphasize and I’ll try to make this short. But you started out saying long-term development approach, and that absolutely is what we are doing at Switchback. It would be so easy to just go after the first stope we could get. And we see a shot in the arm, I believe a big one doing that. But if we do that, then we limit the long-term approach of having a lot of development in front of us and a lot of working faces. So, we are going to take the approach, again, to emphasize this hopefully over the next year, just take time to develop this whole thing. Excuse me, not the whole thing, but a portion of it, develop a large portion of it, so that the following year, we are going to have a lot of stopes ready to go. And that’s going to make 2018 very exciting. That’s a conscious decision we are making today. It would be so much easier if we were chasing, trying to impress everybody on a quarter-on-quarter-on-quarter basis to do that. But instead, we are going to back off as far as that goes and focus on development for the long-term of this Company.

Yes. I appreciated that as those metals really were in the doldrums of a very low point, you didn’t go high grading the mine. So, thanks a lot.

Okay. Mark, I appreciate your questions. Thank you very much.

And our next question, please go ahead.

Jason. Hi this is Harvey Walden. [Ph] Certainly exciting news, a lot of things going on, on many different fronts. And what I am getting from that is there is going to be a lot of cost associated with all of these various exploratory and development projects going on. So, I am wondering from a planning standpoint, how you are factoring in the potential for increased dividends into all of these cost equations.

Great question. Anybody who is been a shareholder for us for a while truly understands that we are very focused on the dividend, having returned $108 million back to the shareholders in dividends as a junior mining company. The dividends are always in our discussions. As far as costs, yes, there are a lot of costs coming up. If we are going to build a mine that has a cost associated with that. Now, the El Aguila project’s Arista mine has been able to absorb dividends, exploration, developing the mine at Alta Gracia, acquiring properties in Nevada, exploring properties in Nevada all in the back of the Arista. Arista is bread and butter so to speak. Now, depending on where metal prices are, that will dictate how much revenue we are going to generate from the Arista. If metal prices spike, I hope we can do everything we want to do from the revenue from Arista, including building the Isabela Pearl. Taking that approach is going to be difficult to substantially increase the dividend. But having said that, we’re very motivated to increase this dividend. And for building a project and metal prices launch, we might have a capital to put the dividend back to $0.06 a share for instance, hypothetically, a month. But we probably wouldn’t do that because we’re going to allocate that capital to build the project for the longer term. So, now we have a 100% increase to our gold, so now we can then go back to the $0.06. So it’s a balancing act. I can’t give you any insight as to when we may plan to increase the dividend or not. That’s always something we talk about at every Board meeting. But in large part, it’s going to be driven solely by the gold price. So, if you have the opinion that the gold price is bottomed and it’s had a great run this year, thus far its’ pulled back a bit, but there is all sorts of reasons why the gold price could run. And that could enable us to pay for everything we want to do and pay a higher dividend. So again, a large part would be dictated by that gold price. But hopefully that answers your question, Harvey. But yes, it’s very complicated but it’s a lot of -- there is a lot of moving parts to that, but you get my point.

Sure, I do. And I understand the moving parts and certainly the metal prices are a very, very big moving part, which you have no control over. However, I remember from the beginning of the Company, the mantra always was one-third, one-third, one-third. So, really the thrust of my question is are you sticking to that as you move into this phase of the Company’s development or are you moving away from that or more toward, I don’t know, some other balance?

Sure. No, it’s great question. We’ve said it in the past that we’ve moved away from the third. And I’ll say it again to be clear here, we move away from the third, third, third for the time being. It would be great to someday go back to a third, third, third. We’re going to be hopefully building a project that’s going to increase our gold production by 100%. So that’s going to -- we’re not going to be able to do a third, third, third. After that, hey, that might be back on the table. So, I think the clearest way I can answer your question is for now, we are returning as much back to the shareholders as we can, balancing the needs of the Company needs, as far as operations and growth, paying taxes and paying the dividend. So, we’re not doing the third, third, third yet but hey, in the future we might go back to that.

Got it. Okay. Thanks for answering the question. And I hope things continue as they have been going.

Hey, thank you. It’s very exciting time for us. We’re feeling pretty good that we’re poised to be the next gold producer in Nevada. And that could do really good things for all the shareholders. So, thanks, Harvey.

And this concludes today’s quarter-and-answer session. Mr. Reid, I would like to turn the conference back to you for any additional or closing remarks.

Again, thank you everybody for joining the conference call. And we will talk to you next quarter. Thank you.