Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by, and welcome to the Third Quarter 2026 Haemonetics Corporation Earnings Conference Call. At this time, participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speakers' presentation, there will be a question and answer session. To ask a question during this session, you would need to press star 11 on your telephone. You would then hear an automated message of asking your hand is raised. To withdraw your question, please press star 11 again. Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. I would like now to turn the conference over to Olga Guyette, Vice President, Investor Relations and Treasury. Please go ahead. Good morning, and thank you for joining us for Haemonetics Third Quarter Fiscal Year 2026 Conference Call and Webcast. I'm joined today by Christopher Simon, our CEO, and James D'Arecca, our CFO. This morning, we released our third quarter and year-to-date fiscal 2026 results and updated full-year fiscal 2026 guidance. The materials, including our earnings release, Form 10-Q, and the supplemental earnings presentation, are available on our Investor Relations website and in this morning's press release. Before we begin, I'd like to remind everyone that we will use both reported and organic revenue growth rates that exclude the impact of FX, the divestiture of the whole blood product line, and the exit of certain liquid solution products. Organic Growth x CSL also excludes the impact of the previously disclosed transition of CSL's US disposable business. We'll also refer to other non-GAAP financial measures to help investors understand Haemonetics' ongoing business performance. Please note that these measures exclude certain charges and income items. A full list of excluded items, reconciliations to our GAAP results, and comparisons with the prior year periods are provided in our earnings release. Our remarks today include forward-looking statements, and our actual results may differ materially from the anticipated results. Factors that may cause our results to differ include those referenced in the safe harbor statement in today's release, and in our other SEC filings. We do not undertake any obligation to update these forward-looking statements. And now I'd like to turn it over to Christopher Simon.

Thanks, Olga. Good morning, and thank you for joining us today. We delivered a strong quarter and we are raising our full-year revenue, earnings, and free cash flow guidance. Nexus and TEG delivered outsized growth driven by sustained share gains, innovation-based pricing, and durable end-market demand, demonstrating the strength and resilience of these core products and our increasingly productive operating model. Third-quarter revenue was $339 million, bringing year-to-date revenue to $988 million. Reported revenue reflects the $153 million impact of last year's portfolio transitions. Allowing for these nonrecurring items, underlying performance remains strong. With organic growth ex CSL of 8% in the quarter and 10% year-to-date. Adjusted earnings per share increased 10% in the quarter and 11% year-to-date to $1.31 and $3.67 per share, respectively, underscoring both the quality and the durability of our earnings. With that context, let's review our businesses in more detail. Hospital revenue was $144 million in the quarter and $429 million year-to-date, down 1% in the quarter and up 2% year-to-date organically. As strong performance in Blood Management Technologies offset softness in interventional technologies. Blood management technologies delivered solid growth, up 8% in the quarter and 11% year-to-date, driven by sustained double-digit growth in hemostasis management. Momentum was fueled by TEG 6s disposable sales and rapid adoption of the global heparinase neutralization cartridge, which continues to accelerate account conversions and penetration. We have significant runway to upgrade legacy TEG 5,000 systems, increase TEG 6s device sales and utilization, and expand share within current indications. The launch of the HN cartridge in EMEA and Japan further strengthens our global leadership and adds international growth vectors to the $400 million plus serviceable market. Growth elsewhere in BMT was modest, with transfusion management gains largely offset by a decline in cell salvage driven by a tough comp following…

Thank you, Chris. Good morning, everyone. We delivered another quarter of strong financial performance marked by sustained margin expansion and improving cash flow. While we continue to take steps to recapture growth momentum in interventional technologies, our results highlight the benefits of our portfolio transformation structural improvements supporting profitability, and the multiple performance levers supporting continued progress toward our long-range plan objectives. Adjusted gross margin was 60.2% in the third quarter and 60.5% year-to-date representing increases of 250 and 390 basis points respectively. Similar to the prior quarters, margin expansion was driven by the adoption of Nexus, with Persona Technology, divestiture of the whole blood business and blood center and our expanding share in both plasma and blood management technologies. These same drivers are expected to support similar gross margins for the remainder of the year. Adjusted operating expenses in the third quarter were $115 million, up $3 million or 3% primarily reflecting adjustments in performance-based compensation due to continued outperformance across the consolidated results. We have also remained deliberate in prioritizing targeted investments in R&D and innovation to support long-term growth. Year-to-date, adjusted operating expenses were $343 million, modestly above $339 million last year. Largely due to the same factors impacting the third quarter. Adjusted operating income was flat versus the prior year in the third quarter at $89 million and adjusted operating margin expanded 60 basis points year-over-year to 26.3%. In the third quarter, operating margin expansion was driven primarily by the improved margin profile of our plasma and blood center businesses. Supported by share gains on NexSys PCS with Persona and the divestiture of the whole blood business. This was partially offset by modest margin pressure in hospital, reflecting continued softness in interventional technologies and the resulting impact on operating leverage. On a year-to-date basis, all segments…

Thanks, James. Before we open the line for questions, I wanna share a few summary thoughts. We are executing with discipline. Delivering solid revenue performance, expanding margins, growing earnings, and generating strong cash flow while advancing our strategic priorities and transforming our operating model. Year-to-date, our results are anchored by strong execution across two of our three growth engines, plasma, and our hospital-based blood management technologies. These businesses are delivering consistent sales growth. Continued share gains and increasing profitability. That strength provides both stability and flexibility as we take targeted actions to strengthen the interventional technologies franchise. We remain firmly committed to returning this franchise to sustainable growth in fiscal 2027. The actions required to restore growth momentum are fully funded and largely within our control. As comparisons improve, and our commercial organization rallies, the targeted actions underway will translate into stronger results. Supported by the anticipated MVP XL label expansion, and The US launch PercuSeal Elite. We expect this business to drive growth and operating leverage while strengthening its competitive advantage. Looking beyond revenue, our portfolio transformation continues to deliver meaningful results across the P&L. Since the start of this transformation, nearly four years ago now, we have expanded adjusted operating margins by 770 basis points. Including 200 basis points year-to-date enabling earnings growth despite the nonrecurring plasma and divested blood center revenue. This earnings leverage reflects a structurally improved business model and it is both durable and scalable positioning us to continue generating earnings growth ahead of revenue well into the future. Lastly, our strong and consistent free cash flow conversion supports a resilient balance sheet and long-term value creation. Our capital allocation priorities remain unchanged. Investing in organic growth, meeting upcoming debt obligations, and opportunistically returning cash to shareholders, while preserving balance sheet flexibility. Thank you. Operator, please open the line for questions.

Please press 11 again. And our first question is going to come from Rohin Patel with JPMorgan. Your line is open.

Hi. Thanks for taking the question. Good morning, everyone. I just wanted to start off with plasma, and you had a nice quarter here. And maybe if you could just help parse out kind of the delta between collections recovery and what the market growth looked like underlying as well as your share gains. And looking forward, I guess, think we're turning our as we turn our attention to fiscal year 2027, obviously, you've had a big benefit from share gains this year. So how are you thinking about that next year and kind of coupled with the collections growth, what can we expect to see on a more sustainable basis for plasma looking forward? And then I have a follow-up.

Morning, Rohin. It's Chris. Thanks for the question. Yeah. Plasma and I don't mean to sound boastful on this, but I don't think we've ever been in a better position on the plasma business than we are today. We talk about the trifecta which is a combination of share gains. And to your question specifically, for third quarter and most of this year, share gains have carried us and, that comes in two flavors. It's both us picking up share from our direct competitor but it's also our customers enabled with the best technology gaining share from their competitors. And I think the dual benefit there is fully half of the growth you see here from us in the quarter. We still have, and this will really be the final quarter of annualizing the price benefits associated with rolling out that new technology. And then the third piece is collection volume. And what we saw on collection volume in the quarter is a further uptick above seasonality of demand there. We're now growing you know, double digits both in The US and internationally in terms of collection volume. So, you know, the trifecta, if you will, of price share and volume. You know, as we turn to FY 27, this is a point in time, I'll just remind our listeners that this is our third quarter earnings call. We've got we'll talk more in May when we issue guidance for the broader business. For FY '27. This is a point in time where we have the detailed sit-down discussions with our customers and get a clear picture for their demand. What I can tell you in the, you know, at the early stages of those discussions, they're enthusiastic about the environment. They, both their end market demand as well as the collections environment here in The US and internationally where they continue to outpace. So we're confident in plasma's ability to play its role as part of our overall growth engine going forward.

Thanks, Chris. And maybe the next one question for James. I think as we look at margins in the quarter, you saw a sequential kind of step down in adjusted operating margin this quarter. I know you kind of mentioned some incremental expenses by Mass Hospital. Margins were about 200 basis points lower versus last quarter. And about 100 basis points lower year over year, so that could have also contributed a bit. So I guess as you look ahead, and specifically, I guess, longer term, do you expect the leverage to come from with kind of a more challenged hospital business? And are you expecting kind of the same level of margin expansion that you saw in fiscal twenty six next year, and beyond. And just maybe it'd be helpful if you could help frame of the puts and takes. Thanks.

Yeah. Sure, Rohin. So I mean, overall, we are pleased with our margin expansion this year. As it really underscores the quality of our portfolio. As you mentioned, we're up 60 basis points in the quarter. It's up 200 basis points year-to-date. And all businesses contributed to that expansion. I would just caution you on the quarterly performance by segment. That could be uneven, you know, just due to product mix, and revenue timing, expense cadence, and so forth. So we like to look at that more on a year-to-date or a trailing nine-month to twelve-month basis. But you know, overall, you know, we are we're pleased with know, the way this is played out. Now as we move into the future, you know, we'll look to see smaller increments in margin improvement. So, like, the 200 basis points improvement that we saw this year that is going to begin to slow down as we get into the future. The increments in operating margin improvement will be less. They'll be 50 basis points or 100 basis points, you know, something more in that range. But overall, there's still room to grow here. Operating margin. And I'll just touch on the point that you brought up on leverage. So yeah, so it'd be the if the hospital business is having a slower quarter, you're going to see a leverage impact on us. And we saw a bit of that in the quarter, but plasma was so strong, it was able to overcome that. We also were able to overcome we had a performance-based compensation increment in this quarter. Due to the performance of the company overall for the year. And that also was a dynamic versus the quarter. In the previous year as well. So that added to it as well. Just to close out, as we finish the year, we held our operating margin guidance at 26% to 27% range that we came out with at the beginning of the year. We may be towards the lower end of that range, and that's all pretty much related to VIVUSURE and the timing of expenses around the launch of PercuSeal Elite.

Thank you. And the next question will come from Marie Thibault with BTIG. Your line's open.

Good morning. Thanks for taking the questions, and nice job on the quarter. Just wanted to ask one here. And it's really on the IVP business. I know that we're expecting to see a return to growth in fiscal year 2027. Maybe you could just give us kind of you know, more of a peek into what's actually happening on the ground. Is the competitor who was rather aggressive with pricing and free product is that sort of out of the market at this point? How has your sales team sort of found its footing? Any more details on all of that? And then any timing, I guess, on the MVP label expansion that you referenced? For taking the question.

Great. Marie, it's Chris. Thank you. Yes. In the quarter, if I step back and look at IBT, holistically, it's important to understand. And we're focused on this as much as anything in the company right now in terms of returning that franchise to growth and a positive contribution. The negative in the quarter was fully 70% of the 12% decline that we experienced was a function of esophageal cooling, and the disruption from PFA coupled with a leveling out of the OEM agreement that we think largely annualized is at this point. So it's just important to keep that in mind. Eight and a half of the 12% decline is attributable to those two factors. For vascular closure, you know, it's our number one focus. I've said this recently, you know, that I wanna make sure I just reiterate. We are confident we've got the right team. The strategy and the tactics they've put forth are the right ones to return to growth. That effort is fully funded, and you see that kind of in our current P&L. And, you know, at this point, we're just putting steps together to do the things that we need to do to be able to return and see that in our operating results as we get into FY '27. And we're confident that we have, you know, the right things in place to do that. We definitely woke up the competition. And that comes in different flavors. But from where we sit, and, you know, I happen to be sitting with a group of our advisers last night in electrophysiology. There's no question that the product is highly competitive. It's a superior product to what's out there. And know, we've got the clinical support to back that up. One of the things that we're looking forward to is that MVP XL label expansion. It's with FDA. The dialogue has been very constructive. Not gonna try to handicap exactly when the release might come. But it opens up a number of things for us when it does. And I think it would allow us to more broadly promote the product. It lets us work with a number of the IDNs and increasingly with the ASCs to be able to get the product on contract. And we think that, you know, top down as well as the bottom-up grassroots work that we're already doing, bodes well for him to be an important part of the recovery to come.

Very good. Thank you so much.

Thank you. And the next question will come from Joanne Wuensch with Citi. Your line is open.

Good morning, and thank you so much for answering the question. Could you give us a little bit of color on the VIVUSURE acquisition? You talked about bringing the product to market in 2027. Anything that you've learned from your initial investment that helps you position for that product launch, or is there anything on the financial aspect of it that you can share at this stage? Thank you.

Thanks, Joanne. Appreciate the question. We're excited about VIVUSHORE and the PercuSeal Elite product coming to market here shortly. We consummated and acted on our option because we really believe that this will meaningfully extend our leadership in vascular closure. It gives us a credible path to category leadership across small, medium, and now large bore procedures as well. It puts us squarely in structural heart. With both TAVR and EVAR procedures. You know, French openings that push into the mid-twenties and products gonna be indicated for that. It's a really meaningful advance versus what's in the market today. So we're excited. We sized that at roughly a $300 million addressable market, two-thirds of its here in The US. It sits, as I said, at the intersection of vast closure and structural heart, which should be a true tuck-in opportunity for us. So we're gearing up for the launch. We are learning from things that went well and less well in our prior launch. And so we're taking a very measured approach. And it'll be a stepwise, progress as we go. Once we have, you know, the official, approval from FDA, we'll be very clear about our plans, but it's gonna be stepwise. We're excited about the longer-term potential. But we're gonna take the steps that we need early to position this product for long-term success.

As my follow-up question, there was a phrase you used during your opening remarks to deploy capital in a balanced fashion. I was hoping you could provide some color on how you think about deploying capital at this stage. Thank you so much.

Joanna, it's James. If I could take a pass at that. So when I think about capital deployment, we strive to be disciplined, balanced, and returns-focused. That's how we think about it. It all starts with strong and growing free cash flow. That provides us the flexibility. We had 95% free cash flow conversion to date, over $200 million in free cash flow this year. So we're well-positioned. And for the future, that should continue. The most capital-intensive phase of our transformation is largely behind us. So our priorities remain clear. And really, they're unchanged. In the near term, we prioritize organic growth. We have some debt reduction coming up here. With the convertible notes that are due here in March. And we also prioritize share buybacks. You saw us do some of that just here at the end of the quarter. So longer term, once IVT execution is restored, we then will look more towards the opportunity for additional M&A like Vivashore. But that's the overall framework about how we're thinking about capital deployment.

Thank you. And the next question will come from David Rescott with Baird. Your line is open.

Great. Thanks, and good morning. I wanted to follow-up on some of the comments around the plasma collection and a broader market growth? And curious to understand maybe the metrics or visibility you have into the forward-looking outlook for that segment? I think in the past, you've talked about how there can be ebbs and flows to the business or to the collections market. And I think prior to the past two quarters, you were maybe in that ebb period of low to no growth. And now you've got two quarters of high single and now low double-digit seemingly market collection growth. So I'm curious, one, on and again, how you're gauging, you know, the sustainability of this accelerated period? And I guess, you know, if the end period was six or so quarters, if that's right, you know, why would it be, you know, unreasonable to think that this elevated collection market growth you've seen now for two quarters should not sustain in the flow period, we'll say, for a few more quarters.

I think you're right. And I think that's not dissimilar to how we are thinking about it. We work backwards from the end market. When we look at the demand for immunoglobulin-based therapy, both primary and secondary immune deficiency, as well as autoimmune diseases, there is meaningful unmet need where Ig is unequivocally still the first-line therapy. For a whole host of reasons. It works very well. It's cost-effective. Etcetera. So we look at the end market demand. We listen carefully to what our customers are saying to their shareholders and work backwards from that. That bodes very well near intermediate and longer term for this industry. When we step in and now look at what that will translate to in the inevitable cyclicality of collections and inventory levels, our view is that this meaningful uptick in demand actually began six quarters ago. And we met the early stages of that when we rolled out Persona. And a 10% yield enhancement across the industry. So that gives us confidence that, you know, where are we in the cycle? We're in a building phase, and we're, you know, absolutely enabling that. For our customers with our technology. In terms of where we go from here, you know, we'll have those discussions. We'll get very clear how many new centers, what's the volume demand, what are they looking at, and we'll back that into our forecast for FY '27. At this stage, and I think we established this, you know, earlier in the year, we're gonna guide to the things that we can control. And that's the share uptick in terms of new centers coming over, and it's a function of the price annualization. So that's what you see reflected in our guidance. We're very happy that we've been able to guide upward with each successive quarter here. But in terms of the volume, I don't disagree with anything you've asserted, but we're not gonna put that into our guidance at this stage because we don't control it directly.

Okay. That's helpful. And on VAScADE, I'm curious more on the vascular closure market. I think you again called out increasing PFA as part of a headwind in the business. If I heard that correctly. I think the latest updates we have at this point maybe is PSA and NAF is 70% or so of the market in The U.S. So therefore, the increasing utilization of PFA is now in theory should have less of a magnitude of an impact on the broader electrophysiology market growth that's eligible for a vascular occlusion device. So interested to hear what your views are on maybe some of those PFA headwinds beginning to lap and whether the vascular closure market or the interest in vascular closure devices is continuing to step higher. And so that as you lap PFA conversion, maybe the VCD kind of market growth on a blended basis should begin to, you know, step back up to higher levels. Thank you.

David, the effect you're calling out is really important. I think the PFA launch has been a defining event in electrophysiology for AFib for sure. And some of it is just, you know, we talked about it earlier, kind of sucking out, you know, all the oxygen from the room. And being all-consuming in terms of getting clinician mind share. A lot of that has played through as you highlight there is an effect ongoing with the number of access sites. Exactly where that will land, we're still understanding because we're, you know, it's new therapeutic adoption. We know that, in some cases, it's a reduction in the number of access sites. It's certainly a change in the sizing, which is why the MVP XL product and the upcoming, anticipated FDA release is so critical to be able to compete in that space. We are seeing an uptick in concomitant therapy between AFib and left atrial appendage. That's a net negative in terms of the access sites. I say all that because it will affect the overall size of it affects the overall growth rate in the category in the near term. But as you highlight, as that levels out, and I'll leave it to you and others to kind of, you know, forecast exactly when that plays out. But as that levels out, what you will see in terms of access site availability for us, which really determines the TAM, is it'll regress to the category's growth rate. And as near as we can tell, that category growth is at least mid-teens at this point, which is an uptick for us going forward and gives us optimism about our ability to return to growth in '27 and beyond. So we'll see. We'll work our way through it. We think we've got a really good product. And the main thing we need to do is execute in particular head-to-head against our competition where we have lost share. Given the underperformance we've experienced year-to-date. Think it's entirely addressable. We think we have a better product. We need to make sure our execution matches that.

Perfect. Thank you.

Thank you. And our next question comes from Anthony Petrone with Mizuho. Your line is open.

Thanks, and good morning, everyone. Making sure you guys can hear me. Have me coming in okay?

Yes. We do.

Okay. Great. Two questions. One plasma, one IVT. Chris, on plasma, we're hearing, you know, the competitor in The US. There have been issues you mentioned in your prepared remarks that one of the flavors of share gains here is actually at the center level. And presumably, donors moving away from the competitor wanting to donate on Nexus. You know? So when you think about that, you know, that's a risk for CSL. What's the latest thinking on the potential that CSL, you know, comes back to Nexus in some way is that a potential? If so, what do you think that can look like? And then I'll have a follow-up on IVT.

Yeah, Drew. Thanks for the question. That Yeah. I made the assertion upfront that I don't think plasma has ever been stronger across multiple dimensions. And that starts with the quality of our relationships. And I think, you know, a number of things that the team did really well through the pandemic and the recovery is they were there for folks. No stockouts. No backorders. We never failed to make a delivery on the devices or the capital, you know, the disposables. That continues. We value our relationship with CSL as we do with all of our customers. We're delighted to have 100% of their international business, to have their US software on a long-term agreement. And so, you know, we'll continue to earn all of our customers' trust day in, day out. And I think that bodes really well for our trajectory going forward. Let me just leave it there.

Very helpful. And then on IVT, one of the drivers going forward here is side of service. And ASCs are, you know, sort of a new channel here for electrophysiology. Pulmonary vein isolation specifically. It feels like that's where those surgeries are headed. But that seems like it's greenfield for vascular closure as well. So maybe just a little bit on ASC. Like, how penetrated are you there at the moment? And are those, like, new sites where really, you can kinda gain new ground here going forward? And how does that play in the world trajectory for Basketball?

Yep. Thanks. I mentioned that we had our electrophysiology advisory board here with us in Boston yesterday, and several of those clinicians are running some of the largest ASCs in the country. They're our customers. We've done a bunch of things with them that I think bode well for our presence in the ASCs. When I take a step back just to put a little flesh around the efforts we have underway, one of the critical gaps that we identified earlier in the year is corporate accounts presence. Both for ASCs, as well as for IDNs. And we've meaningfully strengthened that capability over the course of the year. We think what we offer in vascular closure, particularly now that we have this full spectrum from six French to 25 French, is the opportunity to be their partner on vascular closure and increasingly push venous and arterial across the board. So conversation is know, how does this fit in in their operations? Speed of ambulation, the absence of narcotics, the reduction in rebleeds, is all very powerful value prop for the ASCs. We think that establishes a new growth vector for us heading into FY '27. We're gonna be excited to capitalize on it.

Thank you. Thank you. And the next question will come from Mike Matson Needham and Company. Your line is open.

Yes, thanks. So wanted to ask one on in Interventional Technologies, the Savvy Wire product. I didn't really hear any commentary on that. So can you talk about maybe what the growth was with that? And what the what you need to do to kinda make that become more of a growth driver? Because it seems like a pretty unique and interesting product within that portfolio.

Yeah. Mike, thanks for the question. Savvy Wire is a mixed story for us at the moment. I called out this 70% you know, fully eight and a half points of the 12 points of decline in interventional was attributed to esophageal cooling and the OEM portion of SavvyWire. And so we have a very good relationship with that we inherited when with the Opsense acquisition. Where, you know, we're providing the product for the Impella pump. There's been some releveling of that. There's a dual manufacturing site and kind of, you know, kind of rebalancing that's largely played through. We may have one more quarter of that that we have to work through. But, you know, that will ultimately regress to the growth of the underlying pump market, which we think is mid-teens or better, and we're excited about that. In the near term and in the quarter, it was absolutely a headwind for us. If I flip over to the other side of the Guidewire business, the actual, you know, structural heart play, very powerful. And we see good uptake there. The bifurcation of our efforts between closure and structural heart guidewire has helped. Although it's still, in fairness, early innings. From in into that focus. We're cautiously optimistic. We think that'll be a big part of what drives us in '27. We need to see that come through. Interestingly, we don't talk much about OptiWire, which is the other part of the Guidewire business. But one of the things we're hearing back to the prior question about the ASCs, OptiWire is very attractively priced for what it has a really clean value proposition. And seems to be gaining early traction with the ASCs. We hope be able to build upon that going forward.

Okay. Thanks. And then blood center was this quarter, and I think you said it was positive year-to-date. So are we now at a point where that business can stay in the green in terms of growth from here, especially given this the plasma part of the business seems like it's seeing stronger growth.

Yeah. It's a tale of two halves. As we go through that. I think as it pertains to plasma apheresis, this is done by the blood center customers. So as an example, it's Egypt, but I could say the same thing about France or Canada or Turkey. We are working with local blood center customers that have partnered with one of the larger cell sourcing fractionators to help collect them, you know, help them get collected and kind of drive forward. And so we offer them a turnkey proposition. That's what's gonna drive the continued performance in blood center globally. The other half of the business is the remaining '27, but we will see a relative difference between two paths of that business going forward.

Okay. Thank you.

Thank you. And the next question will come from Michael with Barrington Research. Your line is open.

Good morning. Hey, Chris. So the guide for hospital for fiscal twenty six seems to imply that you guys deliver the best quarter in hospital on a reported basis of the year. And I'm just curious, is that mostly a function of sort of the order timing issue reversing? Or are you seeing meaningful sort of clawbacks on some of the business that you may have lost in Escrow closure. I'm just curious, it's a fairly bullish forecast relative to what you guys reported? I'm just curious what's driving that. Thanks.

Mike, thanks for the question. You're exactly right. It is a bullish forecast for the fourth quarter. We felt comfortable guiding to the low end of the existing range because predominantly of the strength that we're seeing in blood management technologies this quarter. Right? TEG continues to push forward. We're, you know, we're midstream here in this PEG 5,000 system upgrade. We have line of sight to the capital there. That has us enthusiastic. And then we're seeing this really meaningful uptake on a TEG disposable basis we're generating roughly twice the usage from the existing tag successes that we did, you know, even just two years ago. So BMT is gonna have to carry the water for us for sure. In the fourth quarter, well onto the double digits. But to your question, we also need to see a beginning of the stabilization in IVT. And I think some of that is order timing. Some of that is head-to-head competition where you know, we're clawing back things we lost or stabilizing. And, you know, we talk a lot about the investments we need to make in interventional technologies. I've called those out repeatedly. I feel like we've made the investment. We're not looking at further dilution or outflows there. You'll see certain things. We've guaranteed some of these highly competitive territories. On a quota basis to get the right people in the seat and get them motivated. So there's some expense associated with that. That's already, you know, reflected in our P&L. We are also being purposeful about things that, you know, would encourage new usage without wrecking our margins. So we're going to continue to make those investments. We think we'll begin to see the stabilization of that in the fourth quarter. So we pair the losses, not entirely, but partially. And the combination of those two things, really strong, continued strong performance in BMT, with the beginnings of stabilization in IVT should get us to land where we wanna land for the year. But also set us up nicely for growth in FY '27 across the hospital franchise.

Okay, great. And if I could follow-up, and you may have partially answered this question in your response just now. But you guys, a couple of quarters ago, when sort of ran into meaningful issues in vascular closure, sort of called out 50 accounts where you felt like, we sort of got our lunch eaten in some of these in these fifty accounts. And obviously, you put in a lot of changes very quickly as a response. And I'm just curious, I assume that you're probably tracking data from those 50 accounts that you guys identified six months ago. And I'm just curious, you know, is are you at this point, sort of trading punches or are you still losing a little there, but do you feel like you're sort of seeing some anecdotal evidence of the turnaround? Or what are you seeing in those accounts that you identified a couple of quarters ago?

Yeah. Like, the tagline, I assure you we are giving at least as good as we get these days. One of the things we've done is really strengthen our commercial operations. We have a much better handle through some of the obvious tools, Salesforce, etcetera, that track that performance. So we are paying very close attention to the individual account wins and losses and win backs, you know, are super critical for our longer-term success. We have two very different competitors. One is the established, you know, industry standard, and they've meaningfully beefed up their commercial presence. They're working through their corporate accounts team with their new product launch in AFib. So, you know, that's formidable, and we wanna be mindful of that. We think there's a role for us as a more innovative highly legitimate number two in the category. On the other end, yeah, we talk about, you know, the mixed product and some of the things they did early on to secure a foothold. We made it easy on them. I can assure you there's nothing easy about it in that category today. We have a team that's fit for task that's out there fighting for what's rightfully theirs. We value the win backs highly, and I can tell you the balance has shifted. And that's what gives us optimism on a go-forward basis that, you know, it was never the product. And it was never the market. And therefore, you know, we control this outcome if we're committed to it. And I assure you, we have no higher priority as a company right now than to return IVT to growth and that starts with vascular closure. Especially in AFib.

Great. Thanks, Chris.

Thank you. And the next question will come from Andrew Cooper with Raymond James. Your line is open.

Thanks, everybody. Maybe first, wanna follow-up on something you just said there, Chris. When you said the balance has shifted. Can you give us a little bit of a sense for what is it that you're seeing that is telling you that that balance has shifted? Because I think we've all sort of known for some time that the Vascaid product MVP and XL, you know, are well thought of by clinicians. And so when we look at the data, when we look at the performance, I don't think that piece is what's changed. So what informs that view that the balance has shifted kind of ahead of seeing the volume and the revenues showing that shift?

Yep. I think the bifurcation that we put in place earlier in the year is really starting to yield the results we. We have 200 field-based representatives who get out of bed every day and think first, second, and third about closure. And we know that more than two-thirds of that opportunity today is in electrophysiology in, you know, for MVP and for MVP. So, you know, we're tracking how those folks are spending their time and, you know, their win rates, and we're increasingly confident about that. You know, we still had gaps in our own field force, open territories where we had faced the most stiff competition and our folks weren't able to respond for whatever set of reasons. So as we close those vacancies, as we watch these new reps come up the learning curve, it's really powerful. And I don't think we've said this publicly before, but at this point, you know, fully 60% of our field team has been in their territory, in their current role, less than six months. That's an important number to keep in mind as you gauge our competitive response. There is a learning curve. These are very talented individuals when they were hired. Because they were fit for purpose for the task we need from them. And they have a faster uptick than you would otherwise expect, but there's still an uptick. And we've gotta give this team an opportunity to really get traction. I think, as I called out earlier, some of the key account work we're doing with the IDNs is providing them the air cover to be able to go in and pull through the business. I think that's another place where we were getting out executed by the competition. We've turned the tide on that, and I'm pleased to say we've turned the tide on that without meaningfully compromising our gross margin, our price points. We have a great product when it's properly presented and has the appropriate air cover, we win. And that's what you should expect from us going forward.

Okay. That's super helpful, and look forward to sort of seeing the fruits of all that come together. Shifting a little bit to plasma, I did just wanna ask, and I think maybe you touched on it a little. But when we look at the fiscal three q going into the fiscal four q implied numbers, looks like a little bit bigger than the typical seasonal step down in fiscal four q. So just wanna get a sense for is that conservatism? Was there any stocking around some of these fair gains or anything to think about on know, I know you had that chunky software renewal earlier in the year. Just trying to get a sense for anything that would explain maybe that step down or you know, is it really just trying to take a prudent approach to close out the year?

Yeah. Prudence is the exact right word, Andrew. We had a really good third quarter, obviously, above historic seasonality, number one driver in the quarter and now year-to-date were the share gains. So there was nothing around, you know, order timing or one-offs that you need to factor in there. It's just us guiding on the things we can directly control, you know, for further share uptick in the final stages of annualization from last year's technology rollout. You know, collection volume, Yep. We'll leave it to you guys to figure out what you think is the right number to plug in there. Our guidance reflects what we can control.

Okay. Great. I'll stop there. Thank you.

Thank you.

Thank you. I am showing no further questions in the queue. This will conclude today's conference call. Thank you for participating and you may now disconnect.