Good morning, and thank you for joining us. This is an important quarter for Cybin, one that sets the stage for an active year of milestones. In September, Doug Drysdale stepped down as Chief Executive Officer. On behalf of the Board and the company, I want to thank Doug for his contributions. As Co-Founder and Executive Chair, I stepped in as Interim CEO while maintaining continuity and momentum. The Board's search for a permanent CEO is underway. Through this transition, our priorities remain the same: patient-focused rigorous science, disciplined education as our execution and clear communication. We have tightened operational cadence and disclosure discipline, and we'll be adding targeted talent and scientific advisory board expertise to support late-stage execution and launch readiness. Our strategy starts where care happens in the clinic. What I mean by this is that we are designing therapy days that fit within existing schedules with short predictable sessions and a staff-light workflow that clinic teams can run without new infrastructure. From there, we focus -- our focus turns to maintaining wellness. Durability is built into the plan with an efficient retreatment approach that aims to reduce visit burden compared with today's multi-visit standards, so clinics can scale capacity and patients can plan their lives. Progress with regulators follows the same discipline. We move step by step anchored in data rather than speculation, and we'll communicate milestones as they are achieved. The capital plan matches that pace. Following our recent $175 million financing, we are focusing on advancing our programs towards major data readouts. With that context, let me turn to the quarter and the progress we've made. Before we proceed to the agenda, a brief overview of our pipeline. For those of you who are new to the Cybin story, we have 2 lead programs. CYB003,…

Thank you, Eric. Our Phase III PARADIGME program is moving forward as planned. Dosing is underway in approach across U.S. sites and participants have rolled over into extend to generate durability data once the double-blind period concludes. In parallel, EMBRACE has been cleared to commence in the United States, U.K., multiple countries in the European Union and Australia, giving us a truly global footprint. The study targets approximately 330 participants across about 60 clinical sites and is structured with 3 arms to evaluate 2 active doses against placebo in patients with depression whose symptoms remain inadequately controlled on background therapy. The primary endpoint is the change from baseline in MADRS total score at 6 weeks after the first dose. The design is built for clinical reality. CYB003 is intended to run as a predictable staff-light session that fits within existing clinic infrastructure. Prior clinical data showed sustained response and remission at 12 months after 2 16-milligram doses, and our extension work is aimed at translating that durability into an efficient retreatment approach that reduces visit burden compared with today's multi-visit standards. On the regulatory front, our posture remains conservative and specific. Near-term touch points focus on clean study conduct, global site activation and data quality reviews as we advance towards pivotal readouts. In anxiety, the work is tracking on schedule. We have completed enrollment in the randomized double-blind Phase II study of CYB004 and remain on track for top line data in the first calendar quarter of 2026. The study evaluates 2 intramuscular doses given 3 weeks apart with efficacy assessed at 6 and 12 weeks and optional follow-up out to 12 months. The design permits concomitant antidepressants or anxiolytics and allows comorbid depression, which helps the results reflect real clinical populations. Just as important, intramuscular administration supports short, predictable sessions that fit a standard clinic day, so sites can manage throughput with existing rooms and personnel. The protocol also captures information to guide an efficient treatment -- retreatment approach if patients need it. aligning durability with practical clinic operations. I will now turn the call back to Eric to discuss the platform and commercial readiness.

Thank you, Amir. Our focus is to make these therapies workable in the real world, not just on paper. Achieving that goal begins with dependable supply. With Thermo Fisher in place for both drug substance and capsule drug product in the United States, we have a manufacturing footprint size for Phase III and commercialization, which gives sites the predictability to plan therapy days within their existing 4 walls. From there, we extend into the clinic. Through our partnership with Osmind, we have access to a broad network of psychiatric practices, point-of-care software and real-world data, so clinics can map out our protocols onto the schedules they already run. Staggered starts, defined observation windows and clear rule definitions are intended to support predictable session scheduling within existing rooms and teams without requiring new infrastructure. Throughput only matters if the session itself is practical. CYB003 is designed to live inside a standard interventional psychiatry day, offering predictable timing for patients and staff. CYB004 delivered intramuscularly targets a briefing clinic experience that simplifies room turnover and staffing compared with all-day alternatives. The combination is intentional, one program suited to establish clinic rhythms, another built for speed and simplicity, both aiming to raise capacity without raising complexity. Durability is the other half of practicality. Phase II CYB003 data showed sustained response and remission at 12 months after just 2 doses. And our extension work is there to translate that durability into an efficient retreatment approach. The goal is fewer visits and more efficient planning for clinics and payers alike with clear criteria for when patients should return, how long a session should take and how that fits across a full clinic day. We're advancing this platform with a conservative regulatory posture and a disciplined capital plan. Underpinning it all is steady leadership. We manage…

Thank you, Eric. During the quarter, cash-based operating expenses consisting of research, general and administrative costs totaled $28.5 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2025, compared to $18.2 million in the same period last year. Net loss was $33.7 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2025, compared to a net loss of $41.9 million in the same period last year. Cash flows used in operating activities were $34.5 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2025, again, compared to $19.1 million in the same period last year. Operating loss was $28.9 million and net loss for the quarter was $33.7 million or $1.39 per basic and diluted share based on a weighted average share count of 24.2 million shares. We ended the quarter with cash, cash equivalents and investments of $83.8 million. Subsequent to quarter end, we closed a financing of $175 million, which together with our quarter end balance provides flexibility to execute our plan. We continue to allocate capital to measurable milestones and corporate uses remain limited and targeted. Based on our current operating plan, we expect our cash resources to fund key data readouts in 2026 and fund operations into 2027. I will now hand it back over to Eric for closing remarks.

Thank you, Greg. In the quarters ahead, our focus is execution against measurable milestones across the business. For CYB003, we will continue dosing and approach and expand EMBRACE site activation across clear geographies, keeping study conduct and data quality at the center of the plan as we progress towards a Phase III top line in Q4 of 2026. For CYB004, the path runs through database lock protocol-specified analysis and preparation of a clear top line package in the first quarter of 2026. In parallel, we will advance commercial and manufacturing readiness, so sites have reliable supply and a practical clinic day model as data matures, and we will continue to pace investment to milestones. This forward plan also includes leadership. The CEO search is active and progressing, and we'll provide an update when there is news. Day-to-day execution remains stable under the current structure with operating cadence and disclosure discipline intact. Taken together, clinical progress, measured capital deployment, commercial preparation and leadership continuity position the company to navigate the next 2 data events and the steps that follow. To summarize, we have executed through a leadership transition, advanced our late-stage programs, strengthened the balance sheet and prepared for scale with a model built for clinical reality. The work ahead is clear: deliver clean data on time, maintain a conservative and specific regulatory posture and keep capital focused on milestones that move the programs forward. I want to thank all of our employees, investigators, investors, partners and most importantly, the patients and families who make this progress possible. We look forward to updating you as we meet our milestones. Operator, please open the phone line for questions.[ id="-1" name="Operator" /> [Operator Instructions] And we'll take our first question from Pete Stavropoulos with Cantor Fitzgerald.

This is Sarah on for Pete. Two questions from us. One on the CYB004 and the other one on the 003 program. First off, around 004 and GAD, you completed enrollment in early September. Congratulations on that. And you have a readout on 1Q '26, where you enrolled a total of 36 patients. What would you like to see from this study that would give you confidence to move forward into P3s? Is it statistical significance on the primary endpoint? Is it directional data suggesting improvement sufficient? And then what can we expect to see in 1Q? Are you going to provide the 6-week data for the primary endpoint, HAM-A? Or will you provide efficacy data through 12 weeks?

I can take that one. Thank you, Sarah, for the question. And yes, we've completed enrollment in that study. As you probably know, it's a study with 2 arms, 1 low dose arm, which potentially is sub-psychedelic and a full threshold dose. We look at that as a sort of dose response type of study. We would love to see some separation between the 2. As you state there, directional data is what we are looking for, a trend in change or trend in separation between the 2 and also within subject differences in change from baseline, at least with the threshold dose. This is a proof-of-concept study, not necessarily designed as a fully powered study. But if we see a statistically significant difference, we'll be thrilled. But as you say, directional data, trend in improvement and a dose response between the 2 arms is what we are looking for. And we'll share this in first quarter. We will aim to share HAM-A data out through 12 [Technical Difficulty].

Awesome. And then one more question from me. The P2 CYB003 data suggests that 2 doses may keep patients in remission for up to a year commercially. And then taking into account the psychologic experience associated with psilocin, what do you see as the minimum durability threshold needed to compete with SPRAVATO? And how are you thinking about the trade-off between durability versus time spent in clinics from both a payer perspective reimbursement? [ id="-1" name="Operator" /> One moment please while we reconnect Dr. Amir.

Can you hear me now? Sorry, I'm back. [ id="-1" name="Operator" /> Yes, sir, loud and clear.

Apologies for that. Can you repeat the question?

The P2 CYB003 data suggests that 2 doses may keep patients in remission for up to a year commercially and taking into account the psychedelic experience associated with psilocin, like what do you see as the minimum durability threshold needed to compete with SPRAVATO?

Yes. I mean when you look at the guidance that the agency provides for evaluation of these therapies, they want data up to 12 weeks, which is 3 months. We will be thrilled to see effects that are maintained out to 3 months. We are hoping for better. As you know, with our Phase II data, we showed durability out to a year. But based on what is the expectation of the agency, 12 weeks at a minimum would be great. [ id="-1" name="Operator" /> Our next question will come from Patrick Trucchio with H.C. Wainwright.

Congrats on all the progress. I just wanted to get a clarification on the CYB004 program, just in terms of what we should expect as far as statistical powering and the definition of clinically meaningful HAM-A improvement? And then separately, I'm just wondering for CYB003, what operational milestones remain to complete enrollment in APPROACH and our site activations tracking to plan?

[Technical Difficulty] As I stated earlier, it's not a formally powered study. We would, however, be looking at an improvement from baseline within subject within the arms. A clinically meaningful effect would be somewhere around 4 to 5 points on the HAM-A. A trend to difference between the 2 arms would be important as well because we want to look at some dose response between the 2 arms. [Technical Difficulty] study in the sense that it's not a pivotal study, those statistical significance would be amazing. You had a question on CYB003 as well. CYB003 is tracking as to plan. So we remain on target to complete enrollment by mid of next year and deliver top line data by the end of next year.

Great. And if I could, just a separate question on -- as these programs are advancing into later stage and are in late-stage development, I'm just wondering what has been your engagement with payers at this stage and CYB003 and CYB004 and as well with the product profile that's emerging for both of these compounds, how you would expect positioning of them in the market relative to what's already available in TRD with SPRAVATO, given that this is with CYB003, we're looking at MDD, CYB004 GAD. But I'm just wondering how you're thinking about this early payer engagement and as well the product profile positioning against both compounds available, but also those that are in development.

Thanks for that, Patrick. I'll take this one. So I mean, as you might imagine, at this stage, it's a little bit early, but payer engagement, of course, has begun. Commenting further, I guess, on how that develops and how ultimately with SPRAVATO, you could compare to the commercial... [ id="-1" name="Operator" /> All right. One moment. It looks like he has disconnected. If anybody else wants to take this question, while we reconnect him.

So while George is dialing back in, so we have been doing some preliminary market research. But as George reiterated, it is a bit early for -- at least for CYB004. And both the programs, we see them fitting into what is emerging now as an interventional psychiatry paradigm, which really has been spearheaded with SPRAVATO, creating the infrastructure out there. We see these as intermittent treatments that will fit right into that model where patients come in for treatment on an intermittent basis, have the treatment in the clinic and then return for their additional dosing as and when necessary. The infrastructure is there. And we believe with the GAD for CYB004 and with adjunctive and inadequate responder for CYB003, those kind of address the spectrum of the most burdensome or most resource-intensive patients that you typically see in a psychiatry practice. [ id="-1" name="Operator" /> And George has reconnected. We'll go to the next question from Jim Molloy with Alliance Global Partners.

This is Laura Suriel on for Jim Molly. So for the ongoing APPROACH trial, you mentioned how you're planning to have a total of 45 clinical trial sites within the U.S. So you may just provide a bit more detail on the criteria behind choosing these sites and the activation process involved and also as well as when you might think you have all 45 of these sites fully activated and onboard for the study?

Yes. So I can take that. So we are using a mixture of sites that are experienced in clinical trials and a smaller proportion of sites that are less experienced in psychiatry trials. We also have a mixture of sites that are experienced in conducting trials with psychedelics. And then there are other sites that we have included that are experienced in CNS trials in general, but not necessarily psychedelics. As you can imagine, with the number of clinical trials ongoing right now in psychedelics, there is, of course, competition for resources at sites, and we've been very careful in selecting sites that one either have a proven track record of delivering high-quality data or have the -- if they are not experienced in psychedelics, they have the necessary experience and expertise in the psychiatry space in general in other trials, and we are confident that they will deliver good quality data. You referred to the number of sites. Yes, we've got 45 sites selected for this study. Virtually all of them are onboarded by now. What's important is with the number of sites that we have activated, we still remain on track to deliver or complete enrollment by mid of next year with top line data by the end of the year.

Great. And then also, I know the current focus right now is on the CYB003 and the 004 programs. But can you just provide a bit more color on the preclinical 005 program, maybe just on the status of the preclinical studies and any potential partnership opportunities that you may be in discussions with?

Yes. For CYB005, we are doing a number of preclinical profiling studies to characterize the receptor profile, the brain penetration as well as the primary and secondary pharmacodynamics with a range of compounds in that class, which we believe would be well suited to -- actually with some of the neuropsychiatric conditions where there is significant unmet need. So that work is ongoing. And when there is information to share with the market, we will do so. [ id="-1" name="Operator" /> Our next question will come from Eddie Hickman with Guggenheim.

Congrats on all the progress. Just 2 for me. How much visibility do you have into the blinded baseline patient characteristic data from the APPROACH study? And can you talk at all about how this patient population will differ from a TRD population as it relates to baseline? And secondly, what agreement do you have with the FDA related to the safety database for 003 and what you'll need to provide a regulatory filing? Is there a minimum number of retreatments per year needed in extend?

I missed the second one. Can you repeat the second question? [ id="-1" name="Operator" /> Dr. Amir, you're cutting in and out. connect Dr. Amir...

Can you hear me now?

Yes, I can hear you.

Sorry, do you mind Eddie repeating that question?

Yes. So I was asking the first question is how much visibility do you have into the blinded baseline patient characteristic data from the APPROACH study and how this population may differ from a TRD population? And then on the safety database, what you'll need in a regulatory filing, is there a minimum number of retreatments per year needed in the EXTEND trial?

Yes. Thank you. So the safety -- as the trial is ongoing, the data is blinded. We are performing checks as necessary or as possible with blinded data, which essentially are quality checks in a blinded manner. And since this is a pivotal trial, we are, of course, being very careful with the data. There are other checks built into the database, which ensures that there any flags with respect to data quality. They are raised to us immediately if there is a reason for concern. So far, we haven't had anything flagged in the database. So we are confident that the data quality is being maintained. In terms of how this is different from the TRD population. So this group of patients is earlier in the treatment cycle. So these are patients who are inadequately responding. And they may have failed 1 treatment or they may have failed 1 and been on their second treatment, but not adequately responding, but not fully failed. So they are not that 1/3 of the patient population that remains after multiple treatment trials. So it's about 2/3 of -- if you think of the depression population as a whole, this is the first 2/3 of those patients in the treatment cycle, whereas TRD would be the last 2/3 left after multiple treatment cycles. In terms of ends, the -- or safety database, the safety database really is a function of the frequency of administration. Given that this is an intermittent treatment, what we have discussed with the agency as part of our BTD discussions is that the data that we will provide to them, the numbers that we provide to them across the 3 studies would be sufficient to support an NDA. But of course, again, it depends on what we find out in the long-term extension study with respect to treatment frequency. [ id="-1" name="Operator" /> Our next question will come from Elemer Piros with Lucid Capital Partners.

Yes. I just wanted to get maybe just one tiny detail on the loan repayment. If you could clarify how much was repaid and what was the prepayment penalty or the early repayment fees?

Thank you. Yes, we repaid High Trail $20 million and the repayment fee ended up being 10%.

10%, so it wasn't a $50 million loan.

The loan -- yes, the loan was structured as a convertible debt, and they had converted the other $30 million. Approximately.

Converted the other. [ id="-1" name="Operator" /> Our next question will come from Sumant Kulkarni with Canaccord Genuity.

Nice to see the progress. I have 3. On CYB003, during your pivotal trial program, how important is it that patients remain compliant with their background antidepressant use?

Sorry, I was speaking on mute, Sumant, taking that question. The -- so for our patients in the APPROACH study and EMBRACE because this is adjunctive, the instructions to the patients and requirements in the protocol is that they remain on their background antidepressant medication. We do not expect them or advise them to come off their antidepressant medication during the treatment period.

Got it. And then on 004, do you see an eventual pivotal program involving an intramuscular route of delivery? And what are some of the key challenges of developing an oral formulation? And my last question is, what are some of the specific qualities that you believe are must-haves for an incoming CEO?

I can take the first 2. Eric can take the last one. So right now, yes, intramuscular is the route of administration that we plan to progress in Phase III. It's a very convenient form of administration, which also gives us what we need in terms of the plasma exposures and the acute experience, which cannot be achieved with something like oral. With oral, the elimination is pretty rapid. And DMP or CYB004 does not reach the plasma PK levels, the threshold that is necessary for a breakthrough experience, which, as we know, is necessary for therapeutic efficacy. That we are achieving with intramuscular. It's well tolerated. So that is what we are going to take into Phase III.

And maybe I can also add, Amir, that the intramuscular route is one that as we are aware from our market research with the interventional psychiatry clinics is one that is also being used currently by interventional psychiatrists administering ketamine. And so that gives us some confidence that it is a route that will get -- will reach adoption in the market.

And with regards to your question regarding CEO qualities, I mean, obviously, we've been at it for only about 8 weeks right now. The Board is spearheading that process. And at the moment, we're looking for the qualities that this company and its shareholders deserve, a successful steward of capital that investors can feel confident in, someone that has executed in the past, bringing a novel drug to market ideally through commercialization, an individual that has transacted and dealt with big pharma in the past as well. These are all table stakes for us and the next individual that will be sitting in the chair. [ id="-1" name="Operator" /> At this time, there are no further questions in the queue. So I'd like to turn the call back over to Eric for any additional or closing remarks.

No further remarks. I just want to thank everybody for attending the call today. It's been a very exciting time for Cybin, and we look forward to delivering some fantastic updates for everybody in the future. Thank you all for your support. [ id="-1" name="Operator" /> Thank you, ladies and gentlemen. This does conclude today's program, and we appreciate your participation. You may disconnect at any time.