And then volume, you mentioned that the volume had declined for the period year-on-year, I suppose. But for the automobiles, actually, the volume sales increased as compared to the plan for the automobile businesses for the third quarter. You're comparing from same time last year, right? And for the original plans, third quarter, we had actually overachieved the plan for the third quarter automobile. And as compared to last year, it declined because of the next 3-year semiconductor impact that is the largest, and also Chinese market for ICE. EV -- NEV market is increasing or expanding in China and ICE market is shrinking in China, because of which volume in China is in a tough situation. So year-on-year, it dropped. That is about the volume. And what was the next question? Alliance question, right? And Nissan Alliance. Well, actually, with Nissan, the integration possibility, we do not talk about that at all now. And I have to say that. And another thing is that as you said now, development cost will be needed in the future, for instance, software, architecture and so forth require investments. And for the future EVs, batteries, e-axle, if we can commonize those or have a co-development together, that will help reduce the development cost, or cost itself may reduce, thanks to that. However, for those matters, we continue to discuss with Nissan. However, not just Nissan, if it is possible to build a relationship like them with other alternative companies, of course, as long as we can expect a win-win results altogether, of course, for those, we will continue to consider other possibilities. And that is all for your question.