Welcome to the Hologic Incorporated Q3 fiscal year 2008 earnings results conference call. Today’s conference is being recorded. Before we begin, management of Hologic Incorporated has asked that the following statement to be read. Certain statements made by management of Hologic Incorporated during the course of this conference may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may cause actual results, performance or achievements of Hologic to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among others, those detailed from time-to-time in the company’s filings with Securities and Exchange Commission. We express disclaim any obligation or undertaking to release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statements to reflect any change in our expectations or any change in events, conditions, or circumstances on which any such statement is based. At this time, for opening remarks and introduction, I would like to turn the conference over to Glenn Muir. Please, go ahead, sir.

Well, Wendy, Glenn is going to go second, and this is Jack Cumming's, so welcome everybody here today. Thank you for attending our third quarter fiscal 2008 conference call. Joining me on the call this morning is Rob Cascella, our President and COO; Howard Doran, our President, the Diagnostics Group; and Glenn Muir, our Chief Financial Officer. Before proceeding, I want to remind everybody the Safe Harbor Statement accompanying our press release and that applies to the comments made during this call. We are very pleased to share with you our fiscal third quarter financials results for the period ending June 28, 2008, and as is my usual custom, I will briefly touch on the highlights and then let Glenn provide you with further details on our operational progress, give you some guidance for the remainder of fiscal 2008, and then, of course, we will open it up for questions. Let's start with quarterly performance. This has been, the third quarter, our 18th consecutive quarter, where Hologic achieved record earnings, posting $85 million in non-GAAP adjusted net income. That represents a 209% increase compared to our non-GAAP adjusted net income of $27 million in the third quarter of fiscal '07. On a GAAP basis, we reported net income of $61 million or $0.24 per diluted share, which included one-time non-recurring and other charges, which Glenn is going to go into detail. Consistency breeds success and as stated 18 consecutive quarters of earnings growth is no small task. Our focus on judiciously managing cost and improving operating efficiencies continues to pay off obviously by our performance. As stated in our press release, fiscal '08 third quarter revenues totaled $429 million, which represented a 124% increase over the third quarter of fiscal '07 and the increase was primarily due to the contribution…

Thanks, Jack. I would like to now expand on the financial results of the quarter. My comments are also summarized in a PowerPoint accessed on the IR page of our corporate website at hologic.com. My presentation today includes certain non-GAAP financial measures and a reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to their most directly comparable GAAP counterparts is set forth in the same PowerPoint presentation at hologic.com. Third quarter earnings adjusted for acquisition cost increased again to a record high, and was a bit higher than our guidance in our last earnings call. Even though revenues were down slightly from last quarter Q2, they were up 13% year-over-year on a pro forma basis including Cytyc. Our number one sales driver continues to be sales of Selenia. In this quarter, we sold a record 429 Digital Mammography Systems. Domestically, we shipped 348 Selenias, and internationally we shipped 81. Total Selenia revenues this quarter were just over $118 million. Our challenge this quarter was Q2, the March quarter, which benefited from an unusual increase in SecurView Workstation and a favorable product mix, which was not repeatable. Q2 also included a one-quarter surge in Multicare table sales, as we sold 116 tables last quarter compared to the more normal 88 systems, we have sold this quarter. This alone was a $3 million difference. Digital detectors sold to an OEM, were expected to be down, but not quite the $3.5 million drop we ended up with this quarter, as we only sold 30. Included in our GAAP results, our two acquisition-related charges that totaled $37 million for the amortization of intangible asset and the restructuring related to our acquisitions. Absent, these acquisition-related charges, our pretax earnings this quarter would be a $131.9 million and using our effective tax rate of 35.6% net income would…

Thank you very much Glen. Let me try to sum up very quickly here and that is that, for Q3 overall, the revenues were not up to our expectations and we felt that because of the mix of our peripherals etcetera. It would certainly took ahead on the revenue side and we expected to be more normalized over the next few quarters. On the very positive side, we did have a record number of Selenia sold; we had a record number of Selenia orders taken. We had a growth part of gross margin improvement. We sold ten Tomos. We beat our EPS prognostication. Our operating margin was up and overall we thought it was a good quarter. We also believe that looking at Q4, we anticipate we are going to set another record of Selenia units sold. We are going to set another record for taking Selenia orders. We are going to continue to sell strongly the Tomosynthesis product overseas. We are going to see a continued recovery from NovaSure with sequential growth in the quarter over Q3 and we see a double-digit growth in FY '09. Through at the end of today, will be the end of July here, so far and at this point we have no pregnancies in our Adiana, a program on three years and will be filing that information to the FDA and looking forward to receiving approval from them. Relative to Tomo, we have all the data onhand to answer the FDA's questions. We will be moving as quickly as possible and putting all of our resources against that and intent to meet with them over the course of the next month or so, based on our submission and trying to work with them to get a panel scheduled and finally get this approved. So, with that I would now like to open the call up, to questions and Wendy if you would take over.

Certainly, Sir. (Operator instructions). We will take our first question from Eric Lo with Merrill Lynch.

Good morning. I was just hoping to touch on the FDA request a little bit. What is the timing in terms of getting those submissions and what is your expectation in terms of potential FDA panel date?

Eric, the best way to think about this is that the FDA will have somewhere in the area of about 130 days to 140 days inclusive of a panel review once the additional information is resubmitted. So, from our perspective instead of what our original expectations were of a fiscal Q1 release, we are looking at our fiscal Q2 release obviously depending on FDA approval. However, the date and the time period that the FDA remaining is inclusive of a time to schedule and hold the panel review and that is not to exceed I think it is precisely a 132 days.

I see. How about in Selenia? You mentioned that average selling prices came down in the quarter. You turnover most of the backlog within the next quarter. How much visibility, do you have in terms of the sales per order that you get?

Yes and just to be clear that mathematically calculated ASP and the decline in that is virtually a 100% related to the fact that in the prior quarter, we had a significant number of peripheral devices and workstations included in each Selenia Gantry sale. That number of workstations and peripheral devices dropped, as a percentage of total Selenias in the quarter. So, that if you look at ASPs of a Gantry, they have held consistently relative to a quarter-over-quarter review for the last probably five quarters. We are not seeing the market erosion. This was caused by a configuration mix. As to your question about looking forward, we have about, as we can press our backlog to a level of a 60 day turnover or 90 day turnover roughly 50% of the quarter is in backlog, as we enter the quarter. Even though, there is more units in backlog not all of those are scheduled to ship in the quarter. What that means is that by mid quarter, we filled out the balance of what we think our quarterly expectations are going to be. So, we are subjected to whatever the new orders that are much more of a book and bill type that arrived during that quarter, we are subjected at that point. So, whatever the configurations are; whatever the market mix is; whatever the product mix might be. So, the answer to your question about 50% of our quarter on Selenia is in backlog and the balance of it is a book and bill as the quarter unfolds.

Okay. Are you seeing a longer sale cycle for Selenia right now? Also in Europe, I noticed that the number of placements came down sequentially. I was just wondering if there has been any impact in terms of slowing economy in Europe?

No. The question on the sale cycle, I think that it is certainly a more diligent sale cycle on the part of our customers, as we reach beyond the normal Hologic installed base. I think it still shows in our market share that we are winning a disproportionately high share within new deal closures. Our OUS or Europe specifically, I think there were some lumpiness in terms of order timing. However, we are very bullish about international and about the successes that we have seen in markets around the world. So, I do not think it is not a linear trend by any stretch of the imagination, but the potential is there for significant growth.

Okay. Last question for Glenn. I noticed sequentially between fiscal Q3 and fiscal Q2, we saw about a 110 basis point gross margin improvement and 170 basis point EBITDA improvement. I was just wondering, what was driving that leverage considering the sales and the sales mix is relatively similar between the two quarters?

Yes Eric, I think the big part of that is the streamlining of the operation itself. We have much benefit from the combined resources even on the manufacturing side from a purchasing standpoint. We are making a lot of progress with the two companies so that is showing up on the gross margin line as well. I think, we have had improved our operation in general even when we think about Breast Health for a moment and the synergies between the operation in Delaware and the operation in Germany things like warrantee and scrap cost have continually comedown and those are part of our overall progress that we are making and I think we will continue to see that as we go forward as well. Even if the revenues will not increasing as higher the rate, as we might have thought we will still get benefit. I mean, we will clearly get gross margin benefit with an increase in revenues. However, in any case, we do believe we will continue to get margin expansion from some of the improvements that we put in place.

Did you have anything in terms of the provisions for obsolescence, double accounts, or warranties or the like?

There was one warranty; I am sorry one product obsolescence item that was the hit in Q2 that affected the Skeletal Health group to the extent of $2 million that is fully taking care of that at this point.

What about provisions going forward?

No. I think we are comfortable, where we are.

Okay. Great, thank you. I will get back into queue.

Thank you. We will now move to our next question with Amit Hazan with Oppenheimer. Please go ahead with your question sir.

Thanks. Hi, good morning. I wanted to with your stock down 14% or so I thought I would ask a couple of big picture questions because I think that is what people are most concerned about. So, first of all, as it relates to the fourth quarter guidance, I am hoping you can be very specific on why you lowered that guidance maybe talk a little about the primary detector customer, how big of sales number that is for you? Then the street right now is at about 14% growth for fiscal '09? I am wondering if you can just generally give us some comfort around that number or give people an idea of what you are expecting for next year?

Well, I think we can do this in combination of ways. Glenn, do you want to or Rob.

Let me start a little bit on Q4. I think Q4 in last quarters guidance call really reflected a higher Q3. I mean, we have to put in perspective that Q3 was $5 million shorter than we were anticipating that did lead to what our Q4 views would be. That being said, if we look at Q3 to Q4 and if we look at where the growth is coming from sequentially, the number one driver is the addition of about $6 million from the Third Wave. On top of that, if we look at the four reporting segments, we are expecting sequential growth from the June to September quarter in each of those four segments. Just to remind everybody that summer quarter is not a particularly a hot quarter from a shipping quarter for the company. Of all the four segments is the Breast Health that we think will grow the greatest. So, of the remaining $3 million to $4 million in growth, the big chunk will be Selenia, as we increased our Selenias by five units that will bring us to this $438 to $439 million levels. I appreciate for the year at the $1.67 billion it is a bit lower than where we thought we would be before. At the last quarterly call, we identified the four segments and I know that those four segments added up to $1.685 billion. So, we are about $15 million shorter from where we thought or certainly the pieces we were most comfortable with at the last conference call.

Rob, do you want to add any color.

No I think that when we look at Q4, I think that the order rate is expected to be substantially higher. So, we feel very bullish about it. The question is, all those customers going to be in a position to take delivery of what we think the new incoming orders will be for this fourth quarter. So, I do not know if the revenue guidance tells the entire story, I think that order rate will be a compelling factor for us and we feel very optimistic about the trends that we see both on the Selenia side and also for that matter on the NovaSure side for Q4.

Right. All the businesses, diagnostics included are all trending up. So, I mean, we feel good about the quarter. We have certainly with a little bit of our tail between our legs are looking at these numbers, as conservatively as we can and as rationally as we can. Selenia, we are certainly not backing off of the fact that Selenia remained strong for us if the bookings would not be strong that would give us a great pause. However, as I said we expect to set a record. Rob has talked about the normalizing of the peripherals, which certainly is going to help. The fact on the detector, it accelerated, it was a couple of million bucks more than we expected for the decline, which certainly, did not help us. We have factored that in now and we are going to move forward.

Okay. Just a couple of follow-ups on this because I think it is very important. Your guidance last quarter was not $1.685 it was $1.700 as per your press release, which means that you have a reduction in about $30 million or so. So, with the mix in the quarter being $5 million, where is that other $25 million coming from specifically?

Amit I appreciate that last quarter our guidance was $1.7. However, in fact we identified $1.685 and I do not want to put here, but that $15 million in upside was not identified. We felt very good about the business at that time and we felt strength would come through within those four segments. We are not seeing that right now. I think as we have discussed on the Breast Health side even though the Selenia units are increasing we have to respect that some of the product configuration and mix changes is causing us to generate a slightly lower revenue level than we would have thought previously.

Okay. Just another big picture question; just because again I think this is critical. The Cytyc business just generally, if we think about the Cytyc business over the last couple of years, it is grown about 20% and if we look at the March quarter, it grew about 12% and we look at this quarter it grew about 1% year-over-year. Now, we recognize that NovaSure is probably a good part of that? However, if you take a step back and think about that business, think about your acquisition a year ago what has gone wrong? I can not imagine that 1% growth is what you expected. So, can you give us some color on what has gone wrong so far and hopefully some comfort with where you think growth for that business can be over the next year?

Yes. This is Rob. I think it can really be summarized very quickly and that is that the original expectations on the NovaSure business, where they would follow the trend that had been achieved in the prior year. When we got involved in the business and realized where that business needed to be relative to continued growth, a repositioning had to take place. We expected after our repositioning from last quarter that would actually take a couple of quarters. We think we are on the right track relative to our refocusing of sales and our sales program and sales incentive, but the recovery of trying to get back to the normal growth trend for that business is certainly not going to happen in a quarter. So, we believe that when we lookout at '09, we can resume a normal growth trend for that business, which is good solid double-digit growth, but it was not going to recover in a 90-day period. So, at the end of the day, our expectations were that we would have a tremendous cash flow business with our diagnostic franchise. We have a growth driver in NovaSure and it is now a matter of recovery mode for NovaSure with growth expectations for the future. We think that is happening very near term and we think that is happening at a faster rate then we thought last quarter. However, again that was probably the expectation that even when you look at our year end projections in it the thought was that NovaSure was going to be the biggest shortfall from our original expectations and it is proving to be so. It is on clear path right now that we think represents good solid growth for the upcoming year.

Okay. Thank you.

Thank you. Now from Morgan Stanley, we have David Lewis.

Hi, good morning. So for Robert, for Jack, I am trying to understand is boxes are not materially different, but obviously mix played a difficult role here this quarter. Could you think about our business from where you are penetration stand, whether it is 30% or 40%? Presumably more customers are going to be purchasing their second, third and fourth box, not their first box on a go-forward basis. I am trying to understand how mix is going to be transient? This mix, as you have seen, is here to stay and more of a nature of where you are on your development cycle. How am I mistaken?

Yes. It is an excellent point. I think the difference is that we found that revenue from a mixed perspective and configuration mix in Q2 was extraordinary, meaning that about 70% of the number of Selenias that went out carried a workstation within. That is extraordinary if you look at our trend, which has been running somewhere from the mid 50% to 60%. So what happened in Q3 was that we went back to a level that was around the mid 50% range. We believed that a normalized trend is not 50 nor is it 70. It should be running at around 60%. So when we look at our historical numbers of that draw of workstations, we think that over the next quarter to two we will be back at a rate of running at around 60%. Now, I will give you a couple of factors that, obviously, you are right as existing customers buy more modalities it changes that percentage. The other fact of the marketplace is that there are a lot of new single unit customers that will end up having to buy a workstation. Then, finally, in order to display tomo images at some point in the future, the only display technology that will work with tomo is our own display. So as customers buy workstations, they are looking at our proprietary workstation and also looking at our gantry for fear that when tomo does become a product that they already have a workstation technology that is compliant with it. So, there is a lot of factors that will be playing on the percentage of workstation draws to gantries. We just believe that we will be back to a normalized trend of around 60%.

Rob, is that a reasonable trend for fiscal 09'?

Yes.

Okay. So just coming back to the point that is been asked before here, if your boxes are where you saw and mix is really not changing from a term perspective and Breast is the disconnect, where is the disconnect coming from?

Maybe we are not explaining it appropriately. The disconnect was from Q2 to Q3. We had a very high percentage of workstations. When we looked at our backlog going into Q3, it would have suggested that same level of mix, as I indicated earlier, about 50% of our revenues coming out of backlog these days going into a new quarter. Mid-quarter, as we fill out the revenue requirements for the quarter, it is really a matter of whatever the customer requirement is, and it happened that in Q3 there are lot of filling orders of customers that already own Selenias, buying single units and selling and so forth. So that the disconnect from, let's say, our expectation was that the mix changed dramatically from Q2 and it changed dramatically from what the backlog profile was going into Q3.

I understand that. I am saying on a go-forward basis, if you saw for the year mix was going to be on a certain level and the boxes are generally coming in where you said they are going to come into, there is still a revenue disconnect which is largely in breast health. I think what I am trying to figure out is what is that disconnect. The mix is what you thought it was going to be and the boxes were where you thought they were going to be, where is the revenue disconnect?

I think what our expectations are is that when we start looking at the trends of some of our product configurations, not so much workstations even, but also some of our DC to screening units, those units that have been modified for screening-only, hub/spoke type distributed mammography applications, they do carry a lower ASP. So that when we look at those in the marketplace it is not pricing erosion, because you will that our gross margins will be improved as a result of selling them because there is cost taken out of them as well. That is another factor that as you look at absolute units and compare that to revenue dollars, there is a difference in terms of what the mathematically calculated ASP would yield as a selling price as a result of these different types of Selenias that are now entering the market.

That is very clear. Thank you. Just two more quick questions on this broader topic. One would be market share. Jack, you gave some interesting numbers on market share. If you just go up to MQSA data, which is an imperfect tool, it suggests some share moderation, if you would talk to that? Perhaps, Glenn, if you could talk to or update us on where we are in customer fulfillment, it is been coming down? Where are we now and when will we get a going to normalized customer fulfillment?

Well, on MQSA we are around 57% market share. Interesting, over the course of the last year, there is been some over 400 additional units that are out in the field today where that is been the number of sites have gone down over the years and the number of units held steady state. However, there has been this increase of 400, which is surprising, but nice to see that there has been some expansion. It could be just a sheer ageing of the population, more women that are now age eligible to be getting mammograms, although as you have read in the papers, I have that the American Cancer Society would like to see the interval a lot closer by women, and whether in today's economic times or not, that is going to be impacted, going forward or not, we do not know. We do not see that because the weights are still so far out at most of the centers. Our expectations are is that we are going to continue to grow market share. I mean, we are not satisfied with that 57% and we expect that that will be continuing to rise over the course of the next year. MQSA showed, if I remember, 38% this year as far as the amount of penetration. If you looked at a year earlier, the penetration was about 22%. So we certainly have seen some very nice growth over the course of the next year, over this last year. You had a question David that I am not sure I understood. You were trying to ask Glenn.

Yes. In terms of fulfillment, Glenn has been talking about customer fulfillment levels coming down which obviously has implications to your backlog. I just want to know where we are in that process and when it is going to stabilize.

Yes. David, I think we have made terrific strides as far as fulfillment. As Rob mentioned, at the beginning of a quarter, we have a pretty good idea of about 50% of the Selenias where they will ship at the last half of the quarter. There is, of course, some change between customer gains, and it is really based on customer readiness, which is ready at that time to take the product. So to the extent, a year ago, our customer fulfillment was more driven by the manufacturing capacity in what we had in the supply chain. Today, it is focused more on customer readiness. So if we think about the backlog we have now a 500 in one unit, I would expect that that may continue to drop ever so slightly. I would not expect as big of a drop as in this quarter. We are pretty close to where we want to be. As Jack said earlier, this quarter, Q4, this summer quarter, we do expect our orders for Selenias to be higher than Q3. So this will be an improved booking quarter for Hologic. With that in mind, we have also indicated we are expecting an increase in the number of Selenias shipped and installed for revenue, so both of those numbers are going up. So to a certain extent, the backlog may come down ever so slightly, but we are close to where we wanted to be as far as a 90-day or so cycle.

Okay. One last quick question, just on leverage given where the stock is trading today. Obviously, that was very strong in this quarter. When you think about your Selenia business, Glenn, Jack or Rob, would you think about the outlook for fiscal '09? The leverage you are seeing this quarter, do you think it is sustainable? Can it improve even in a more difficult Selenia mixed environment?

Rob will answer that. I just wanted to mention also one thing, David, about backlog. That is when you look at the last six quarters, actually there has not been a quarter where we have not been over 500 units in backlog. So it has been pretty steady state and then our order rate, our trending on the order rate has also been pretty consistent. As you could see it certainly did go up this quarter over the last quarter and the quarter before. So it is trending in the right direction and I know there was some apprehension expressed about is it getting softer when we looked at it from Q1 to Q2. So with that, I think, I will turn it over to Rob to ask a question. I was actually just buying him time probably.

No, not at all. I think, as we look out at '09, we see continued improvement relative to gross margins and margins overall, and there was a couple of reasons for that. Glenn indicated some of the operating synergies and our efforts to cost reduce products, which is an ongoing effort in the company. Then secondly, what we see is the introduction of couple of new platform products that will carry very attractive gross margins. So, mainly Tomosynthesis and in addition to that the introduction of Adiana and then Cervista, which being our Cervista high-risk HPV test. So all of those, when we look at gross margins will be additive in terms of gross margin returns. Right hopefully that answers your question, David.

Thank you very much.

Sure.

Thank you. We will now move to Amit Bhalla with Citi.

Hi, it is Amit Bhalla with Citi. On the Breast business, I understand the quarter-over-quarter decline in ASPs. I was hoping Glenn you could give me a little bit more color on the performance of some of the other businesses, the Suros, MammoPad, the Cervista did we see sequential growth and wherever you can give me some more granularity on the sales that would be helpful?

That is Rob part.

Yes and this is Rob. The specific numbers we can share as well, but our IBS Group or Interventional Breast Solutions Group had strong sequential growth as we look at both our ATEC business, Celero business and MammoPad business. The businesses has been achieving greater market share. We have had tremendous adoption of our Celero product which is our hand-held ultrasound-guided biopsy product and in addition to that the MammoPad has been certainly not stellar growth but a steady growth business for us. In fact we have very optimistic expectations for that as it is being integrated in with our Selenia sales at this point in time. So, when we look at it, that business is growing at a rate of $2 million or $3 million a quarter and it is in terms of our share of overall unit, we represent somewhere north of a third of all the vacuum units that are being sold and we are rapidly becoming the preferred choice in the guided hand-held biopsy market with our Celero.

Would you comment on Cervista. Can you give me a specific Suros dollar amount for the quarter? I have just a couple of follow-ups.

Well, we are hoping not to get all that Amit. I think as Rob said that group was up a couple of million dollars and we had growth in each of those areas, Celero, Suros, MammoPad. Cervista in general was up by $4 million from Q2 to Q3. We hit and continues to grow. We hit $45 million in revenues for that Cervista group in Q3 and that is expected to continue to grow. That has become a rapidly-growing business of ours, as you would expect. As we have all these new Selenias in the field and we are getting close to 90% compliance as far as customers buying a service contract either at the time of sale or very often even after the first year warranty ends. So, we continued to expand that service business.

Just last two here. What were ThinPrep volumes in the quarter and Rob for fiscal 2009 give us an idea of how higher Tomos prices are going to impact overall ASPs and our outlook for total Selenia unit. Thanks?

Yes. As far as our Diagnostic business what we saw was a moderate growth for the quarter and that was primarily driven by greater imager adoption in the US and very strong international growth. So, we are really holding the plan on the Diagnostic business there were no surprises. We have been running in that area of really virtually flat in terms of vial units or filter units for ThinPrep and the growth has been and remains one of higher imager adoption in international. Relative to what we see going forward for next year, when we look at ASPs it will be much more on the digital mammography side or it will be much more about some of the things that we are doing with different configurations of the product. We believe that we can go after a much deeper share of the low end market with some of the things that we are working on in terms of additional de-featuring of our Selenia. We are in a tremendous position of advantage because of the costs that we have taken out of the product and we continue to do that with some of the feature elimination. Why we want to do that is, is that there has always been a question about how deep can we go into the digital mammography market. We think we can take a much bigger share of the ultra low end with some of the things that we are working on that does not mean that we are going to cannibalize our mid to high-end market quite the contrary because where our Selenia dimensions comes out it will be sold as a 2D premium unit. So, it will sell at a price higher than Selenia and then finally when Tomo is released it will sell at another $150,000 premium over that. So, what we are trying to do is really dissect the market into deeper penetration in the low end and then capturing the high end with our advanced technology the Tomosynthesis. Does that answer your question?

Yes. I just want to know, what was the outlook for fiscal '09 units?

We have not finished our plan yet and I would say that we are expecting unit growth in just in summary. It would be a disservice if I gave you a quick number other than that we are still optimistic about growth, both domestic and clearly internationally on digital mammography.

All right, thanks.

Sure.

Thank you, sir. We are now moving on to Charles Chon with Goldman Sachs.

Yes, good morning. Thank you for taking the call. One housekeeping item to start. Can you breakdown the Selenia backlog number for us between US and international?

Glenn, do you want to…

Yes. Charlie, I do not have the exact number Charlie but we are tracking where we have been? Our bookings have been 80% US and 20% international and our backlog pretty much reflects that.

Okay, great. Thank you very much. Just looking at the middle of the income statement here, I know there were some timing issues in R&D that could hit some of the sequential variability that we are seeing through the year up to this point. How should we think about R&D going forward should the fourth quarter R&D stay at the same taproot spending level, as we saw here in the third quarter or is it just a number that is determined as the percentage of revenues for you at this point?

Well in particular for Q4 if we look at the three categories in operating expenses, I would expect each of them to trend up slightly in Q4 and I say that actually without Third Wave, the numbers we are looking at now it do not include Third Wave. So, if we look at it as an absolute we should see those operating expenses increase by about $2 million. I think as we go forward though Charlie that in absolute dollars they are not going to increase as fast as revenues and you are going to see that on a percent of revenue basis these operating expenses are going to fall from the 30% down to the 29% level and that includes R&D as well. Now Q4, off course, now, we will have Third Wave. So, that will jump the R&D expense up considerably because we will be adding $9 to $10 million of total operating expenses from Third Wave.

If I can add, on a dollar basis, there will be continued investment across all product lines. So, we do not see that trending downward. I agree that as a percentage of revenue it will, but in absolute dollars there will be ongoing investment in the Breast Health area, primarily as a result of, advanced clinical trials over the course of ’09, as we broaden our experience with Tomosynthesis and a lot of that will be used for reimbursement purposes clearly in the area of both NovaSure and Adiana, we will have second-generation products that are already in our roadmap for those. So there will be ongoing investments of some substance. Obviously, Third Wave will be a very expensive R&D endeavor for us, but again, very positive in terms of the revenues it will yield.

Rob, I think we want to do justice to Diagnostics in that that we are investing in the Diagnostics area where we have some new products advancements to our inventories that are going to be coming out and we will be launching internationally first.

Absolutely.

Okay, great. My final question is I just want to go back to a very basic question on backlog again. Can you help us understand how you have a sustainable business if the number of Selenia pieces continues to outpace the new orders? Why does backlog not need to grow meaningfully to give you that runway for continued growth in this category?

Well, it is a very good point. If you look at the trend of our business, and we have always said that orders are rather lumpy, and so they are not linear. So when you might look at a couple of quarters ago where we had a high concentration of very high volume orders that were shippable over multiple months, even multiple quarters, it created a surge in backlog, as you will. We have been working that off. In fact, you are absolutely right, if at some point there is not a crossover or at least an equalization in terms of backlog being neutral, then there is no way to run the business on a book-and-bill basis. We believe that the order rate will be very high for our Q4. As a result of that, we will be at a backlog-neutral state. As long as we can remain backlog-neutral, or with some modifications, either slight increase or slight decreases, then that is a manageable business for us. Utmost important factor is that our order rate continues to grow on a quarterly basis. At some point, because of the surge in larger quantity orders, there will be excess orders over revenue in one given quarter, and then quite the reverse in another series of quarters thereafter. So when we look at it, we try to look at our bookings rate in terms of our growth factor on much more of an annual basis or a rolling series of quarter basis, because there really is no linearity in the way that orders are received.

Thank you very much.

Thank you, sir. Tycho Peterson with JPMorgan has our next question.

Thanks for taking the call. On the configuration issues, not to beat a dead horse here, but One of the questions we are struggling with is, what is the underlying market dynamic here? Perhaps, Rob, I will direct this to you, if you can give us a sense whether this is a function of more additional sales to your existing customer base or are you really pushing into those smaller tertiary centers? Then, as we think about that, just how often you are running into CR and whether you expected more of a pricing dynamic going forward? It would be helpful.

Sure. I think that if we think about the workstation mix element of our revenue, that is clearly just the dynamics of the orders, meaning that if in fact this happened to be a quarter where we were shipping to a lot of existing customers that did not need workstations, then it did change the composition of Selenia revenue or ASP is. If we look normally, Tycho, as we go deeper into the market and sell to smaller accounts, the draw of workstations would actually be greater. It would be higher, because each of those would need a workstation, so it is not an incremental Selenia. What we may find as we go deeper into the market and we are doing much more head-to-head competition with likes of Fuji or maybe other low-end players, is that sure though there will be much more aggressive pricing, but that is where we think this new series of de-featured Selenias will be a competitive advantage for us. It will have all the clinical benefits of a DR-type digital mammography system, but be featured equivalent to that of a CR system and be priced in that same pricing category.

Okay.

Does that help?

Yes, that does help. As I step back a little and look at what you had talked about last quarter, I mean some of this had been telegraphed but the broader question that I have here is in terms of systems planning, ERP, your ability to forecast and have good visibility on the business going forward, can you give us a sense as to, A), where your comfort level is; and B), are there steps being taken to improve visibility because I do feel like there is a little bit of a disconnect between the message the Street tends to get intra-quarter, and obviously the results we see here. So I am just wondering if you can comment on that.

Yes. As I said earlier, we have visibility now because we have compressed our delivery date so much in terms of customers now are taking deliveries in 30 days and 60 days that about 50% of our revenue for the quarter is coming out of backlog. What that is done is put much more pressure on our ability or our needs to do not just planning of units and customers, but also a better job at configuration forecasting on the parts of our sales organization. So we have modified our order planning process, so that now we always plan on a bi-weekly basis. Now what we have done is expand that, not more frequently, but more comprehensively. What that means is that our sales directors throughout the United States and abroad not only give us Selenia units but give us a Selenia configuration breakdown. So we know what units are going with workstations, what units are going with connectivity devices, what units are de-featured screening units versus otherwise. So, we are making an effort and have made an effort over this past quarter to fine-tune the planning process to give us better visibility, not only for guidance for you folks, but also from our manufacturability point of view, so that we can fine-tune what our MRP might be to that given quarter or otherwise.

Okay. Then with regards to the detector point transition, can you just talk a little bit about what you are thinking for this coming quarter and next year? I mean, do we get over the big hump in that shift?

You mean relative to…

To the OEM, the supplier agreement.

Third party? Yes, I think we will be out of that business by July of next year.

Well, we know we will be out of it except for service parts, but the reality is that is going to continue to spinout and we think that is good for our customer and for our sales for own differentiation. The acceleration caught us a little bit by surprise at the level it was, but fundamentally it is again better for both us and it allows us to keep our own eye on our own product and only have to manufacturer one at our facility down in Delaware.

Just to add to that, we have a new design, FDA-approved detector that if we do not want to make available to a third-party. As a result of that, we were very direct in terms of not providing improvements on an OEM basis. So, by exiting this agreement, we have an advantage in our detector technology that is proprietary to Hologic. That is exactly the position that we want to be in.

Okay. Then just thinking a little bit about tomo, I do not know if you are willing to the number of questions you have received from FDA, but some parameters on that will be helpful? Then, also, how do we think about booking revenues? I mean is there a longer validation period and when do you expect to start booking revenues in Europe for tomo?

Well, I will give you the depth of the questions. It will give you an idea at least about how the FDA works. When we did our filing for the bone product relative to a software change, they came back with 15 pages of questions on a change for our bone densitometry system, which we were more than pleased to fill out. With the complexity of this system, quite frankly, it was in the same area, maybe a couple of more pages. The number of pages is not really important. It could be one page, and be devastating to you, it could be 50 pages and it is a lot to do about nothing. I mean we take all their questions seriously. However, in this particular regard, they want to see the data sliced and diced the way they want to review it. We thought we had done that, but they have also changed out people at the FDA. There are some new folks that are there that maybe have a different orientation or focus than former members. Since this is a first of kind product they are giving at a very tight look. It is nothing that we have not answered for other products that we have filed on. Its just going to take us to wait through the data to get back to them with this, but all the data is here in hand we will have gone through with all exhaustibly over the weekend and Monday meeting to a person, who is doing what so we can get it back to them as soon as possible. Rob you want to...

Just to the other part of your question, Tycho, in our December quarter, we will be shipping tomo units in Europe.

In terms of the validation period, can you just comment on...

The validation period for the tomo unit?

Yes.

In what respect? I am sorry, maybe I misunderstood.

Even though there is an initial validation period over which you will not be booking revenues? Are you actually going to booking immediately on installation and…

No, they will get booked immediately on installation. I mean, we have been validating this product in the fields with baby units for probably in the last six months.

Yes, okay.

So I mean, we have units in Europe. We have units throughout the United States is really our field validation. So, that these units when they ship, there'll be revenue upon installation just like the current Selenias are with maybe some modifications for software elements or things like that. Again, it is revenue upon shipment.

Okay. Then just finally on, as we think about HPV adoption in Europe, can you just talk a little bit about the infrastructure in place? How many labs you are using in tests that was an ASR and how we think about the sales force and some of the other dynamics there going forward?

Yes. Currently we are doing little with HPV in Europe meaning Third Wave was doing really virtually nothing with the product OUS certainly shipping it domestically under an ASR model. Relative to what our expectations are for the current market, I would like Howard to maybe share on that a bit as well.

Yes. The customers that are currently using the HPV assay on the ASR format are obviously on the US today. There was about mid-30s of those that exist. I think Jack in his comments had alluded to what our plans are from a training perspective next week. In the month of August we will have all US sales folks trained as well as our international folks. We have approximately similar size sales teams in both of those markets in the Europe as we do in the US and we will be starting ground floor from an international perspective, but we will be trying to expand those customers that currently are using the ASR formats now as well as pepping others to be ready on day one upon FDA approval. All teams will be out hitting the street talking about the product, as we breakthrough the balance of August and they complete their training.

Okay, great. Thank you very much.

Now, we will take a question from Peter Bye with Jefferies & Company. Peter Bye - Jefferies & Company: Hey, thanks. Obviously pretty exhaustive questions. When you look at on the growth it is obviously decelerated the last two couple of quarters $22 million to $13 million and I think your fiscal Q4 guidance implied 8% to 9% pro forma organic growth. When does that turnaround? Do we have to wait for the impact of the new products in the US next year with the Tomo launch Adiana later in the year and perhaps the HPV in the US at the end of fiscal Q2? How should I think about it when we look at next year? What is there to reverse the deceleration in growth?

I think a couple of things. Again I think that we have some exciting things happening on the Breast Health side and not just in the area of x-ray imaging or mammography. We have a brand new product platform coming out in our interventional products business, which will be hands down competitive win over the other players in the marketplace not that we have been lagging in that business at all. Again this will be a driver for both international and our domestic customers. Secondly, we are already on a recovery track for NovaSure which has been if you take an averaging of these businesses that business is not growing has been a detriment to what our overall growth this quarter-to-quarter. We believe that we will back on track relative to NovaSure, as we enter into 09. So, that is a positive trend in addition to and this is irrespective of Tomosynthesis or otherwise. Thirdly, I should say we will have the introduction of Adiana into that market, which will be yet another new product that will drive growth. Then finally, we touched on our service annuity that business is expected to grow in a rate of probably 35% to 40% next year. So, when we look at these businesses, there is a little bit of a flattening that as you have indicated on quarter-over-quarter growth but for some of the reasons that we just gave looking at next year, we see a lot of bright prospects with respect to the product lines that I have covered. Peter Bye - Jefferies & Company: So, You think that fiscal Q4 is the trough in the deceleration of the growth rate?

Yes. I think what we are seeing is that for next year, we will have several new products or enhancements to products and three primary FDA clearances on enhancements to existing products or new products, which will drive growth. Peter Bye - Jefferies & Company: Okay, great. You just pretty completely, but just on the mix of the Selenia systems, you would thought that fiscal Q2 with the mix was going to continue on with what you have in the order backlog and it was running above historical trends. You ended essentially flat with historical decisions that would suggest the back half of the quarter was below historical trends on the mix shift within that. Is that a way to look at it?

Yes. We look at what happened in Q3. I mean, I will give you a specific data point just to I mean we went from 70% draw in workstations in Q2 down to about 55% draw. We normally run at around 60%. Peter Bye - Jefferies & Company: You entered the quarter running at the higher end. So, it was a drop off below historical in the back half, but you have already seen that rebound and what we have seen in this quarter already today?

Well, what we are looking at is the trend from a bookings prospective that gets us back to what we thought the normalized trend would be for the out quarter meaning going into Q4. Now that does not mean that, there will not be a further improvement. What our position was that over the next couple of quarters actually I think we stated three, that we believe that we will resume the normalized trend of our workstation additions to Selenia Gantry's. That is for a couple of reasons as I said I mean clearly one thing that works against that mix as existing customers buy Gantry's, they do not always buy workstation. The other offset of that is, as new customers that are lower end customers, are buying Gantry's they typically have to buy a workstation with their Gantry because there are no other alternatives at that point for them. The further enhancement to why more workstations will be sold is that as they say people are interested in the future. Tomosynethesis images or 3-D mammography images are proprietary to our workstation. So, you will not be able to display tomo images, if you are using a third-party workstation and that is not because we designed it that way that is simply because there are, it is so new that there are no standard relative to PACS companies or third-party workstation companies being able to display those protocols. Peter Bye - Jefferies & Company: All right, great. Could you give us color on the tomo orders you have are you buying back their digital or they are keeping the Selenium?

Yes. These were all incremental units. We think for early adaptors they are probably not going to trade in their Selenia, we think that they will end up buying an incremental unit and these are all just to be clear these are international units.

Right. Peter Bye - Jefferies & Company: Right. I understood. Can you give us any sense of flavor of how long that runway is that for incremental before you will start doing the swap out?

We have said before that if we do a cross section of the US market right now there is probably 600 to 700 sites that would be defined as those are that are early adaptor, academic sites, those that want to be first with technology. So, when we look out at the next couple of years, we will target those as being the sites that are probably new Tomo Systems there could be interesting Selenia customers but are not trading in Selenia at that point. Peter Bye - Jefferies & Company: Okay, thanks.

Thank you, Peter. The questions, the granularity that you folks are looking for we welcome so that we do not confuse you more than we normally do on every quarters call and we spare Glenn a little bit. Since I travel extensively internationally and he has been active in presenting the Tomosynthesis story, there is not one customer that I have talked to or sold the system to that even thought about and these are Selenia users and non-Selenia users even thought about a trade in. Just what is happening internationally is the same that is happening in the U.S. and that is as mammographies continuing to grow there is more pressure on these centers to be able to try to treat the number of patients in a reasonable period of time and they need more systems clearly internationally than they do domestically.

Thank you, sir. Next we have Bruce Jackson with RBC Capital Markets.

Good morning. Speaking just on European 3-D tomo and ultrasound, can you tell us are they being shipped with CAD and what average pricing are we getting on those units?

Well, I am going to let Rob answer this because he discounts and I never do.

Generally we have not sold a lot of CAD OUS, particularly in Europe and most of this has been in Europe. We would expect that when we start selling tomo units outside of Europe; let's say in Latin America and probably Asia that there will be a CAD option that will be included in it. The pricing, as you recall, these are dealers that we are selling to and then the dealers are selling to an end customer. We have achieved the pricing target that we thought was appropriate for the dealers. To be more specific, as we said a tomo unit was probably going to sell for somewhere in the area of around $0.5 million, including the gantry workstation and the tomo features. While there is a dealer discount off of that, obviously on a transfer price basis, our dealer sales are going to average somewhere in the area of around $400,000, a little over $400,000 per unit.

Then moving over to the Diagnostic business, should we get the percentage of ThinPrep slides that were imaged during the quarter? Speaking of the new imager, can you tell us what the changes are compared to the existing imager?

Yes. For the quarter, approximately 60% of our ThinPreps in the US were imaged and in reference to some additional development work. If you really think about the very small laboratory, the labs under 10,000 annual preps per year, we are working on a solution that will be of lower cost, slightly de-featured. That will basically take your microscope and have a lot of the imager capabilities on it, where we can do it at certainly lower cost points and better margin for that business because the mathematics of smaller lab times to click see just do not work for our larger units. So this has been a development project for the last couple of years. We will be launching it internationally first by the end of '09 and we will plan on releasing that to the US market, but it is really for those laboratory that can not play an imaging today, but would certainly like the increased quality and the incremental reimbursement associated with it. We think we have a very elegant solution for those folks.

I might add also, Howard that is because our group added R2 what we have done is we have had our CAD group in California working with the CAD group in Marlborough to continually fine-tune our imager here and our algorithms, looking to improve those. So anything that we can do to provide more capability and insight to the pathologist and cytologist is clearly what we are wanting. We are certainly working in that regard to improve on that by itself in our current imager product.

The new imager will have algorithm improvements with it?

We have a development project that actually we are working on a new algorithm that we believe will be placed into, obviously, the new product we are talking about today. At this point, we have plans of updating it in our existing platform as well.

Okay. Then last question, going to the Third Wave HPV ASRs, can you just talk a little bit about what your current pricing strategy is on that product compared to Digene? Are you going to be using the same pricing strategy once the test is launched commercially?

I think as we talked about the day of the acquisitions is that we are going to be talking about global economics within the laboratory. As a refresher, we think that the real benefits of this product are several. The first is operational benefits. We think there is real hard dollar in savings for the operations of the laboratories that choose our assay. Second, again QNS, which is a problem today for laboratories, we continue to get reports that it is about 5% of the test. They can not run the assay on using the Digene products out of the same profile. That was down to around 1% when you used the Third Wave Cervista assay. So that is, again, real hard dollars associated with incremental revenue that is being lost by our laboratory customers today that will be gained in the future. Having 16 to 18 genotyping is again going to be a new opportunity and new incremental revenue opportunity for those labs. I frankly think, the last thing we want to talk about is before we have covered all those bases there is price. I think we are going to be price point because all of the other features and benefits that we have that add incremental revenue and take cost out of laboratories.

Alright, thanks.

Thank you.

Thank you, sir. Now from SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, we have Jonathan Block.

Thank you. First question, if I can start with the pipeline. Jack, I know you mentioned that the FDA may be a bit overwhelmed with the number of the filings that they have in the front of them. There seems to be some concern among investors with the time line of some of other products that you have in the pipeline. So with what you know today, are you still comfortable when we turned to HPV and Adiana that those products were going to get through the process in the first half of your fiscal year '09?

I think you can guess my answer, and the answer is yes. First of all, it is a different group that is looking at it than the medical device side. We have been in really constant communication with them. They have done a wonderful job with the Third Wave people and with us. Adiana, of course, we owe them the information which we will be gathering starting next week. You say we are optimistic, we are optimistic based on the response to-date. We have had several delays on the device side. It has been highly disappointing, which is an understatement. We have tried to comply with everything that they have asked. We have worked hand-in-hand with them. Reality is apparently that has not been good enough. We think their questions are valid, good questions. We are going to try to make it easier for them to understand this data and we are going to also ask if they can work maybe harder to try to get through it when we give them that information. Hopefully, that can happen. Positive certainly on the Third Wave and the Adiana, and we already know where we are relative to tomo.

Okay. Maybe just a quick clarification on the Adiana. I believe in your prepared remarks you said no additional pregnancies. I was just a little confused. Is that you are talking about no additional pregnancies since the FDA came back to you and requested a third-year data. Is that correct?

That is correct?

Okay. Shifting gears over to the mammo side, international was a little bit below our expectations. So, we would just love to hear some thoughts there. Is that just variability? Do you think you may have lost a little bit of share in the quarter? I also think you mentioned international order numbers, if you did, I missed it. Could you repeat it please?

Sure, I think Rob can do it. Go ahead, Rob.

Yes, I think it is just that the whole discussion of linearity we had. Again, I think a couple of orders from a revenue perspective that did not shift. We also had a couple of new orders that due to timing did not come in, have been insisted to come in. So I think we are going to see a bit of peaks and valleys. Overall the international market is growing at a significant rate, I mean, certainly north of 20% easily.

Okay. Just one last one. We heard that GE had a pretty strong FFDM quarter here in. Maybe if you can just comment inter-player, was there anything different in terms of the dynamics between GE, Siemens, Fuji, et cetera?

No. I think we have seen the typical aggressive selling tactics on the parts of both players, GE and Siemens. I do not think that it was any more extraordinary that it has been. We have been running in the area of high 50s, low 60s relative to our market share and we remain consistent in that area. I think there is always going to be a time where one of these competitors wins a large deal or a series of deals. In fact, not that any of us like it, but I think that keeps the markets rational. We want that to be the case, so then the prices are not in a free fall because of desperation on the parts on one of our competitors. I do not feel that we have lost market share if that is the specific question. I think, we are gaining share overseas and I think we have maintained our share in the US.

Okay, great. Thank you.

Thank you very much.

Thank you. Moving on to Isaac Ro with Leerink Swann…

Hello. Thank you for taking the question. If you look at your backlog for Selenia today versus where it was last quarter, how is the percent of new digital customers versus existing digital customers, how is that complexion changed?

In terms of defining the complexion change is…

I think, it means all customers versus taking market share away from GE or Siemens customer is that what you are saying?

Well, obviously you have more to do with how many of the customers will bring you the digital altogether they are looking at users versus digital.

Yes. I think that is a good question. I would still say that probably 75% of our customers are new customers that are just buying digital and 25% of those that are buying additional digital units.

Okay. Then you mentioned that you are surprised in Selenia configuration is changing presumably that was in the back half of the quarter given your visibility cutting in, was it due to a handful of large customers or just trying to understand how that surprise came about that you had a decent amount of visibility to start.?

Well, let me…

Can I amend your word surprise, I think as the quarter unfolds and that we are taking new orders over the course of the quarter about 50% of the quarter is known at the beginning of the quarter that is what is in backlog. So, as we are getting new orders the composition of those customers changed in terms of the composition that was received in Q2 and that is what led to the difference in terms of that makes of customers that were buying workstation and the mix that was not. Again and I know we touched on it last quarter and probably because of all the discussions around NovaSure, I did not touch on it enough. It was really our Q2 that had an extraordinary high draw of workstations and peripheral devices in comparison to what happened in Q3. Then the factor in Q3 was that as we filled out the quarter with those customers that are much more of a book and bill. It happened that the vast majority of those towards the later part of the quarter, who are all either existing customers that were buying normal Selenias for but no workstation or it was customers that were buying just our screening units for their outlying satellite areas.

Okay. Then just to get back to that first question. You said 75% were new digital. What was that ratio 75:25 this quarter what was it maybe a year ago?

I would say that, that is a good question as well. I would probably say that it was probably more like 90:10 given that there were far fewer customers that were repurchasing more Selenia at that point. There was a higher adoption of new customers converting to digital for the first time.

Okay. Then just lastly, just to clarify on Tomo. You said each one requires its own workstation is that true as you scale up some multiple tomo systems as well?

What the real point that I am making is that if you are a Selenia user today and you use our workstation, if you buy a tomo unit, you do not have to buy a workstation. We will upgrade your workstation for you with software. If you do not use our workstation and you buy a tomo unit, you are a going to have to buy our workstation as well. So, the reason why I think that is important for you to note is that as we sell Selenia today those customers that are thinking about the future recognize that in order to display at some point when they upgrade to tomo images it would be a much more cost effective for them to buy the workstations now. That was my point.

Okay. So, if your customer today that buys Selenia and does not choose to use the Hologic workstation are you seeing anything in the market, is there a second or third-party workstation provider that is undercutting you on pricing that maybe the reason why you are not seen this high on the tax rate?

What it really is that the customers would obviously prefer to use their PACS workstations, if they could their problem has been that since the inception of digital mammography the PACS companies have a difficult time in keeping up with the changing requirements of a subspecialty like breast imaging because we are dedicated to breast imaging and our R&D resources going to only workstation requirements for breast imaging it is really difficult for a generic workstation to have the same workflow and functionality as ours. So, those that are on a tight budget and are not concerned with high volume workflow and do have a PACS probably would end up using their PACS workstations. Those that are of a higher volume, where those that are not on a PACS would end up buying our workstation because number one if you are interested in workflow and protocols flexibility that would be ours. Secondly, if you are a small entity it does not really have a PACS and uses the virtual PACS or storage, you are going to need our workstation in any of them. So, there is really not a lot of alternatives from a third-party standalone workstation. A couple of companies have things like that [Axis] sells one, Kodak sells one I think [Cidera] up in Canada sells one those are not predominant factors it is generally, if you are on a enterprise PACS then you are comfortable with using network station from mammography you probably will not buy the vendors proprietary workstation.

Got it. Lastly I saw the other day there was an FDA advisory on FFDM/ PACS image identification issues is there any impact for you is your technology impacted by that?

No as a matter of fact I mean, there (inaudible) whole initiative that is IAG, which is digital mammography standardizations for the formatting of images and communications or otherwise. We are actually the industry coacher on that and we think participating in the development for standard for digital mammography. So, we think we are in compliant with changing requirements related to image structure and connectivity.

Great, thank you.

We will hear next from Jayson Bedford with Raymond James & Associates. Jayson Bedford - Raymond James & Associates: Thanks. In the interest of wrapping this up by noon, I will make it quick. Just quickly, Rob the de-featured Selenia is that the Selenia as I am just wondering if so on a percentage basis how much does this represent of the total Selenia volume.

Yes and when we look at it is a offshoot from the Selenia S and I will explain that. Then we are running at on our S and then our low end units probably somewhere in the area of 14%, 15% of total Selenias. So that it is not on an overwhelming percentage of the numbers of units that are going out these days but it still it is a growing percentage. So, if you look back a year that number was probably around 5%. If we think about the Selenia S it is a fully functioning new Selenia all but for the capabilities to do diagnostics. What I am referring to is even a depth below that. It is a strip Selenia with a modified acquisition counsel not the same workflow capabilities of even the Selenia S and some of the other features that would be extracted from it are really designed to make it the equivalent of what a user experiences with let's say CR and the almost lack of workflow that you have with CR. So, it is really being designed to be a step above that. Certainly below the S and will be on a pricing threshold that let this compete in a very basement place of the market where if there is that last 10% or 15% of units that will be sold in that battlefront that this new product or this de-featured product will be used to go to penetrate that. Jayson Bedford - Raymond James & Associates: Okay, that is helpful. Rob, just to my understanding, you can not sell the tomo product even for 2-D until you get FDA approval, correct?

That is correct. Jayson Bedford - Raymond James & Associates: Okay. Lastly, I realized that you do not want to give '09 guidance but would you expect to grow earnings at least double digits in fiscal '09 possibly in the mid-teens?

Glenn, this is your moment.

Jayson, we were not prepared to go into '09 at all. I mean the part of the problem is, I do not even want to come up with an estimate that might be considered too low. I think we need to take appropriate amount of time and to set the expectations appropriately, which we will do at the Q4 conference call. I think as we have discussed and we think about digital mammography in general, we are looking for an increase in the total number of units in '09. I think Rob said that earlier. He also talked about many of the new products that will be coming out in the '09 timeframe that we expect to get traction in '09 and then certainly into '10. I think besides that if you look at the leverage we are beginning to exhibit both on the gross margin and cost of sales line, I think we are all pretty bullish about what is possible in the '09 timeframe. Jayson Bedford - Raymond James & Associates: Okay, Glenn. Outside of Third Wave, are there any large incremental costs that will hit the model in fiscal '09?

I do not know. We are all looking at each other. I think the answer is no. The business is established. We have some new factory things going in Costa Rico with our surgical products, but those investments have already been there. Jayson Bedford - Raymond James & Associates: Right. Okay, fair enough. Thanks.

Thank you, Jayson.

Alan Croll, a private investor has our next question.

Gentlemen, I am wondering whether your backlog represents 100% binding contracts or some of them are cancelable for this Selenia?

There is nothing that would stop a customer from canceling an order. They are binding contracts, but clearly if a customer decides at any point, other than week before we are about to put on the truck, that they can certainly exit one of our contracts. Now maybe another question should be, has that happened? I can tell you that of any of our Selenia orders, we have not had a Selenia order cancellation since the inception of the product.

The customers pay a restocking charge if they opt to cancel. The reality is, as Rob said, it has not happened. I remember that it happened in the first year of selling one customer and that was (inaudible) corrected. That has not happened since we have sold several thousands of systems.

Does that include not coming back to you for price reduction in order to consulate the sale?

Once that agreement is signed that price is set.

Okay. I have another question about your press release. There is a discussion about some increases in cost of products sold associated with the write-off of a Third Wave inventory at fair value and it says you have not determined the amount of increases because you have not yet value the underlying assets. I am wondering how did you buy the company without valuing the underlying assets.

Alan, in the purchase price allocation we take a number of different steps to value both the underlying technology and some of the R&D projects that would lead to an in-process R&D write-off. That is a pretty involved step that I think relates specific to some intangible assets as opposed to the ongoing value we think we will derive from the earnings of Third Wave overtime. So this is an accounting allocation that needs to be made simply in the purchase accounting side of things.

Okay. Two more questions. One, can you tell me what was the rationale for splitting the stock in the most recent split because it seems like the stock is already gone down 50% since that time? Was there any rationale to that split?

Yes. The split we are talking about is a split that was effected in early April, the two-for-one split. At that time, we were bullish and continue to be on the prospects of the company and we felt that by splitting it, we could broaden the distribution of our stock at that time.

I would add this also, and that when you look at the drop, as a shareholder that is a very fair question, I think more fair is the drop in the stock and that is that we took a big hit, as you know, last quarters.

Well, you have taken a big hit each of the last three quarters

Well, that is good. Let's look at that. We have had record revenues and earnings for 17 consecutive quarters. Our revenue for the first time in 18 quarters was not a record, but we had 18 consecutive record earnings. With that we have faced an economy that is certainly been anemic where we have been in a recession although the current administration has not figured that out yet. We took about a 7 point drop on NovaSure not meeting Street expectations which has been a lot to do about nothing. The reality is though that in this quarter-to-quarter world you have you continually have to meet expectations. We have done that consistently, whether the Street believes that the fundamentals of this company are not as solid as they have once been, we can not do anything about that except continue to try to outperform which we have done consistently. I think the last thing this company would ever do is apologize for incredibly solid performance, and as a medtech company, one of the best performing companies out there. As a shareholder myself, that is considerably down as others are. We are bitterly disappointed by the Street's reaction to the last several quarters. As far as this quarter goes, we understand it more so than we clearly did last quarter. I read the vagaries of guessing where the stock is going to go up to the analyst.

Well, I notice on the insider transactions that confidence has not really been translated into purchases by insiders. In fact, when the stock was around 70 before this split there were many, many sales by insiders. Is your confidence going to be translated into further acquisitions of shares by yourself or by your peers?

Well, I can tell you this that we have been unable to, because of the Third Wave transaction, make any purchases during this last quarter, which, obviously, we all would have done at the price of the stock. Our windows as a senior team are much, much limited compared to a person at not the Senior VP level or Director level or above, but it is a fair question. At the price point it is today, it certainly is not appealing one as long as we are not blocked by our attorneys.

Okay, thank you.

Thank you for the question.

Thank you. We will now hear from Mike Child with Civic Global Health.

Hi. Two questions. One is on your Q4 guidance for Selenia unit sales; can you give us a rough idea of the US versus OUS breakdown? I think historically its range from 18% to 24% as OUS.

I think its going to be probably in that same area of the 80/20, maybe a percent or two maybe south of that. 100 units potentially internationally in the balance in the US.

Okay. Jack, I think in your prepared remarks you mentioned something about double-digit growth in fiscal '09. Did I mishear that, and then what were you referring to? Was it top line or bottom line or…

I was referring to NovaSure. So you actually do not think I talk expect…

Okay. All right. Thanks.

It was for NovaSure. We had said in the last quarter that we thought based on the information we had we thought it would be around 9% and the Street said you can do better than that. We said until we got at least through the quarter and into the fourth quarter, we would not be able to, we would not come back and say any more. We have vetted a lot of issues there. Our sales force has responded positively. Our customers have responded positively. We have got a growing percent of backlog that will be used each quarter to make our number. So we are feeling certainly more confident in double-digits is where we are in NovaSure for next year.

Okay. Great. Thank you.

Thank you.

Sir, it appears that we have no further questions. I will turn the conference back over to you for any closing or additional remarks.

Well, I think anything at this point might be anticlimactic. I appreciate everyone's patience as we have done it to our call. I would like to thank all of the associates for Hologic worldwide for their unwavering commitment to delivering certainly the best technology available, the best service available. They have consistently outperformed. Our goal of trying to be a company providing the best technology for women is something that we take passionately and we will continue to. We also understand the frustration of our shareholders. We continue to work to outperform. I think our record shows that. The record of our gross margin, the record of our EPS I think is an indication. We re certainly have our hands around this business, even if there is a drip in our revenue it shows that we clearly know what we are doing. We cannot manage the things, like the FDA and other things that are beyond our control. All we can do is continue to work within the system and try to get it to work more in our favor. That is what we are going to work hard on in this next coming quarter. We are still very optimistic for the future of this company. That has never changed. Going forward, we expect great things. So with that, I thank everybody for taking the time to be with us today and wish them good health. Thank you very much, Wendy.

You are welcome sir. That does conclude today's conference call. Thank you for your participation. Have a great day.