Good afternoon, and welcome to the Third Quarter 2017 HP Inc. Earnings Conference Call. My name is Denise, and I'll be your conference moderator for today's call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded for replay purposes. I would now like to turn the presentation over to your host for today's call, Steve Fieler, Head of Treasury. Please proceed.

Good afternoon. I'm Steve Fieler, Head of Treasury for HP Inc., and I'd like to welcome you to the fiscal 2017 third quarter earnings conference call with Dion Weisler, HP's President and Chief Executive Officer; and Cathie Lesjak, HP's Chief Financial Officer. Before handing the call over to Dion, let me remind you that this call is being webcast. A replay of the webcast will be made available shortly after the call for approximately 1 year. We posted the earnings release and the accompanying slide presentation on our Investor Relations web page at www.hp.com. As always, elements of this presentation are forward-looking and are based on our best view of the world and our businesses as we see them today. For more detailed information, please see disclaimers in the earnings materials relating to forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. For a discussion of some of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, please refer to HP's SEC reports, including our most recent Form 10-K. HP assumes no obligation and does not intend to update any such forward-looking statements. We also note that the financial information discussed on this call reflects estimates based on information available at this time and could differ materially from the amounts ultimately reported in HP's Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2017, and HP's other SEC filings. For financial information that has been expressed on a non-GAAP basis, we've included reconciliations to the comparable GAAP information. Please refer to the tables and slide presentation accompanying today's earnings release. And now I'll hand it over to Dion.

Thank you, Steve, and good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us today. It was another outstanding quarter showcasing strong execution of our strategy. I'm very pleased with our sustained performance and continued momentum. We are striking the right balance in how we plan, innovate and consistently deliver. We are competing and winning in our core print and PC markets. We're entering new growth markets and natural adjacencies with the right products, supply chain and go-to-market with world-class sustainability. We're investing in future categories where we can disrupt with innovation, and we are relentlessly focused on increasing productivity and taking cost out of the business. With that context, let me highlight a few outstanding results for the quarter. We delivered non-GAAP diluted net earnings per share of $0.43, at the high-end of our outlook range. We grew net revenue 10% year-over-year to $13.1 billion, and for the second consecutive quarter, achieved growth in both Personal Systems and Print segments. And we continue to see broad-based growth across all regions with double-digit year-over-year increases in both EMEA and APJ. We surpassed our expectations entering the year delivering free cash flow of approximately $1.7 billion for the quarter and $2.8 billion year-to-date. And through quarter 3, we returned approximately $1.6 billion to shareholders through share repurchases and dividends. In the past 7 quarters since HP became a standalone company, you've heard us talk about reinvention. We reinvented ourselves, our company and our solutions to amaze our customers, partners, employees and shareholders. Reinvention is a long journey, but we're driving consistent results and seeing our hard work and dedication bear fruit. Make no mistake, there is much more work to do based on the volatility of our markets, but the past several quarters reflect our ability to consistently execute with a healthy…

Thanks, Dion. We've continued the momentum from our strong first half, and I'm very pleased with our third quarter results. We delivered net revenue of $13.1 billion, up 10% year-over-year as reported or 11% in constant currency. We continue to see broad-based and consistent performance across businesses and geographies. Regionally, year-over-year, Americas grew 8%; EMEA was up 14%; and APJ grew 15%, all in constant currency. Gross margin at 18.6% was up 30 basis points year-over-year. The increase was driven primarily by Print margins resulting from productivity improvements and higher supplies mix, partially offset by higher commodity cost in Personal Systems. Sequentially, gross margin was down 60 basis points, driven by an unfavorable print mix and a higher sequential growth in Personal Systems. Non-GAAP operating expenses of $1.4 billion were up 35% as reported, but this year-over-year variance is largely driven by gains recorded last year resulting from the divestiture of certain marketing optimization software assets. Sequentially, operating expenses were down 1%. Net OI&E expense was $66 million for the quarter with a non-GAAP tax rate of 22% and a diluted share count of approximately 1.7 billion shares. We delivered non-GAAP diluted net earnings per share of $0.43. Non-GAAP diluted net earnings per share primarily excludes restructuring other charges of $46 million and acquisition-related charges of $40 million, partially offset by nonoperating retirement-related credits of $34 million, tax indemnification credits of $10 million and the related tax impact on these charges. In Q3, GAAP diluted net earnings per share from continuing operations was $0.41. Turning to the segments. Personal Systems net revenue was an impressive $8.4 billion, up 12% year-over-year as reported or 13% in constant currency. This was our fifth consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth and third consecutive quarter of double-digit constant currency growth. We continue to segment the…

[Operator Instructions] And your first question will be from Sherri Scribner of Deutsche Bank.

You guys have done a good job of returning supplies to some modest growth when you make the adjustments from last year. We saw 2% growth this quarter, which was the same growth we saw last year. What type of long-term growth would you expect based on the 4-box model? Should we assume that supply is generally flat long term or do you think that growth is modestly single digits? At some way, it would be helpful to learn your long-term perspective.

I think it's important to remind everybody how we define stabilization. We've done that on previous calls, and we've said that supplies revenue and constant currency not declining further is our definition. We also walked you over the last couple of years through the 4-box model drivers and our consistent focus on driving improvement across each of those 4 boxes. Now in quarter 3, our focus and execution over the last 2 years on all 4 of those drivers saw the supplies revenue mature and stabilize 1 quarter ahead of plan, and we're very, very encouraged by that. As it relates to quarter 4, we're on track for supplies revenue to be flat to slightly up in constant currency as well as being adjusted for last year's supplies sales model change. Beyond quarter 4, we believe we can drive further improvements across all the 4-box model drivers to impact supplies revenue as we go forward.

And Sherri, we'll talk more about FY '18 specifically at our Security Analyst Meeting in October. So everyone should join us then.

The next question will be from Wamsi Mohan of Bank of America Merrill Lynch.

As part of shipping this installed base that you talked about sort of placing high-value printers, you've seen some deceleration in the growth rates on printer placements. How much of that is an opt-out of lower NPV printers versus competitive dynamics or versus the market slowdown? And do you feel that the installed base is shaping up to a profile that can keep this positive supplies growth over the next year or so on an organic basis as you're defining on this adjusted basis? And I have a follow-up for Cathie.

Sure. So from a growth perspective -- first off, it's a little bit tougher compare, right? So if you actually look at what's happened to unit growth, kind of each of the quarters this year, each quarter the previous year is a bit tougher. So I think that's part of what's going on. And then the other part is that we are very much focused on high-value units. As we've talked about before, all units are not created equal in the market, and where we want to focus all of our energy is really on positive NPV. And those typically are really the high usage categories. That's where we want to grow and where we want to gain share.

And so double-clicking a little bit on that, Wamsi, I would say that the team continues to execute on both the core and the growth initiatives and they're maintaining sort of steady momentum in print hardware as we have over the last several quarters. In quarter 3, print hardware units grew 1% year-over-year. But notably, this was driven by better-than-normal sequential growth of 4%. And we achieved slight increases year-over-year in both Commercial and Consumer hardware, which was driven by a very disciplined focus on the 4-box model drivers, particularly high-quality units that you're referring to there in your questions such as growth in the office A4 laser market. Of course, this comes with high usage. Double-digit growth in multifunction value, that's the 21st consecutive quarter in a row of growth in that segment. We are ramping our A3 business for the first full quarter. We only have 6% market share, as you'll recall, of this $55 billion market. Encouraging thing is that is up 1%. We were 5% last quarter and homing also, which is a more profitable part of the market for us due to the full verticalization of our technology. We're pleased with the results but obviously, always more work that we can do.

If I could follow up on your free cash flow, you're now achieving $3 billion here, and that's including some restructuring payments as well. How close is this to what you would call normalized free cash flow for the company?

So I think -- I don't think there is necessarily a normalized free cash flow. One of the things that you saw in the strength of our free cash flow this quarter was the business mix impact. So when Personal Systems grows $700 million revenue sequentially, or 10% well above normal sequential, you're going to see a big increase in accounts payable as you saw and a lot of free cash flow. So the concept of normalized free cash flow is really not one that I can really comment on directly.

The next question will be from Katy Huberty of Morgan Stanley.

I'm trying to decipher your comments on PC revenue for the fourth quarter. Do you see a scenario where PC revenue actually declines sequentially? Or your commentary is just that it grows slower than normal seasonality and then maybe in that answered comment on which market, Consumer or Commercial, you see more price sensitivity? And then I have a follow-up.

Sure, Katy. So instead it will grow less quickly than what is typical seasonality, not that it'll decline. We do expect it will grow sequentially. And then in terms of price sensitivity, we see the greatest impact in the Commercial space. Consumer price increases have taken hold, and we continue to perform very well in the Consumer space. I think Consumer revenue is up 14% year-over-year even though we have done price increases. So it's much more in the Commercial space. And our view is that -- as we mentioned on the Q2 call, that it would take a quarter for them to kind of catch up. And we did see some of that in Q3, hence some of the sequential improvement in operating profit for Personal Systems.

Okay. And can you share some metrics around the A3 success thus far? I know it's early, but any color on how many partners you've ramped? Any customer numbers? And then as you think about this going forward and we try to track the business, are you planning to break out any metrics more consistently so we can monitor how the business scales?

We don't release a lot of detail around the business for obvious competitive reasons, but what I would tell you and to give you a little bit of color is that I'm very encouraged by the initial progress. I'm excited by our future in this $55 billion market. We only have 6% share of this $55 billion market in the last quarter. It was our first full quarter of shipments. The customer reception is particularly positive and particularly positive around our security message, having the most secure printers on the market as well as the choices that are available to our customers from a technology perspective. They're able to choose both ink-based solutions and laser-based solutions. We are -- as it relates to go to market, we're ahead on our partner on-boarding targets across all 3 regions, across transactional managed print service channels as well as the traditional copier partners that we were looking to on-board. The pipeline is very strong. We have a very clear ambition to be a relevant A3 player, and we're on track to doing that. If we can add just 10 points of revenue share in the next 3 to 5 years or so, that's $5.5 billion of top line and the associated OP drop. So encouraged with our first full quarter start here.

And let me just add, Dion mentioned that we had 6% share. That is up both year-on-year and sequentially, a point or a little over a point. So that's one of the metrics you can absolutely see externally and track as we make progress here.

The next question will be from Steve Milunovich of UBS.

Dion, you mentioned reinvention a few times, and that's your tagline that we've written about and have some interest in. Regarding that, first of all, what's changed? Parent HP tried to kind of get back to the invent idea without a lot of success. What's different about what you're doing particularly in terms of the new product pipeline? And then second, why should investors be excited about this? I remember when the split first happened, a number of HPQ investors were kind of saying, "I don't want to hear about growth. I just want the cash flow." What gives you confidence you'll get a substantial return on capital on your investment in the new product areas?

That's a great question. And the way we think about it is to anchor ourselves in our strategy, which straddles multiple time periods. The core is all about the here and now. It's our core businesses of Printing and Personal Systems. We have to be excellent in the core. I would say we're doing a lot of things differently right across the company. We begin our journey through customer insights, and we've really bolstered our customer insights team, listening to our customers, working with our customers to help define and build our products. Then we go to work on the cost associated with those products, the full bill of materials, taking out the cost that we can and adding in the sprinkles of magic that delight our customers. And that's across the entire portfolio, both Printing and Personal Systems. The third thing we've done differently is really put a focus on design. Design really matters in a OneLife world. Whether it's the design of our award-winning x360 or our new Sprocket printer that is the sprocket for your pocket. We really do think about how customers use our products every single day. And then we think about what really concerns customers, what's most on their mind. Things like security. It's a dangerous world out there. And for us to have the most secure printers and personal systems on the market is important to our customers, therefore it's important to us, and we invest heavily in that area. And then right across the company, we reinvent all of our processes. We take out nonrevenue-generating costs in our business that allows us to continue to innovate across the core but also invest in our future growth areas. And we only have 3 of those. We have our A3 business that we see as a $55 billion opportunity; we have our graphics business, which continues to grow; and commercial mobility. And that's over the next 2 to 3 years. And the third time horizon is, obviously, that sort of fleet of 10 years-plus where we contemplate our future around immersive computing and 3D printing where we've got some very strong indicators as we release our new 3D printers into the market globally.

The next question will be from Jim Suva of Citigroup.

I have a question and a follow-up, and I'll ask them both at the same time. The first question is I think, Cathie, in her prepared remarks mentioned that the goal is to have printers that consume more ink and more NPV and that yield itself to more Consumer -- I'm sorry, more Commercial growth over Consumer growth. But Cathie, if I look back, it looks like the past 3 quarters or so, Consumer unit have meaningfully outgrown Commercial units. And maybe -- I don't know if that's due to Sprocket or something else there, but it looks like while the goal is to grow the Commercial, it looks like actually Consumer has been growing much faster. And then the follow-up question is on the seasonality for PCs, you mentioned the market will still grow, but you'll undergrow normal seasonal. Do you expect to lose share this quarter? Or why do you think you'll be below seasonal? Is that because of pricing action? And do you think you'll maintain share or lose or cede some share?

So Jim, let me take the second one first, just to make sure that we're all communicating well. What I said was that our business in Personal Systems would grow slower than normal seasonality for our business. We have been outgrowing the market by quite a bit. So I don't expect that we will lose share even though our revenue will be a little bit behind normal seasonality.

And as it relates to printer hardware, obviously, not all print units are created equally. And I mentioned a couple of data points earlier, there's certain segments of the Commercial market that we are very interested in, the growth in office A4 laser, which comes with that high usage is very important to us. The double-digit growth in multifunction value is also very important to us. Obviously, ramping the A3 market goes without saying. And it means not abandoning our traditional home ink markets. We have done very well there with the release of new desktop printers as well as the Sprocket, which is obviously exciting a customer that, in many cases, have never had access to print in the past. The subsegment of demographics that are buying sprockets are largely millennials, in many cases their first print experience. And what they're finding is that they store what they like and they print what they love.

The next question will be from Toni Sacconaghi of Bernstein.

I have a question and a follow-up. First on the question, I know you talked about currency really not having an impact in Q4 because of the way hedges work for HP. But if we just step back from that, I think entering fiscal '16, you talked about a currency headwind of $0.34 to EPS for HP when the dollar was at 3% to 4% headwind. I think spot rates would point to $1 being a 2% tailwind for fiscal '18, which if you just did sort of the blind linear math would suggest you should have a $0.15 to $0.20 benefit looking forward. So I understand hedges need to roll off, and that's why you don't really expect much impact in Q4. But as we just think about currency more broadly looking forward, given we saw a really material hurt in '16, why couldn't we see a really material benefit looking forward as spot rates stay where they are? And I have a follow-up, please.

So Toni, we'll talk more about '18, obviously, at the Security Analyst Meeting in October. But I think one of the things that needs to be brought into that analysis is what's going to happen in the market from a pricing perspective. We've now seen in fiscal '17 pretty significant price increases. And so if there is a tailwind from currency in '18, my -- our expectation is that prices are going to have to come down pretty significantly to relieve some of the pressure that's building because we've been increasing prices this year. And so then it's going to be, ultimately, what is the total impact is going to be how many price declines do you have to do and what impact does that have on both revenue and EPS.

I'm going to tell you I spent my life in sales, a large part of it in any case. And one of the hardest things that any salesperson ever has to do is to stand in front of a customer and convince them why their price has to go up, either through [ cost currency ] or cost headwinds or other issues that impact the business. So I think Christoph, Nick and Richard, our 3 regional presidents, along with their sales team have done an outstanding job in doing that repricing. But as you get in front of those customers, whilst they understand for the large part that they have to pay more for the products that they receive and they see the value in their products, they expect that as currency goes the other way that you equally reprice the products as well. And I think that's very much worth keeping in mind. As we head into the Security Analyst Meeting. we'll talk more about it.

And then just to follow up, in your guidance for Q4, you've talked about PCs being up sequentially although not as much. Typically, the Printing business is also up, and yet the midpoint of your EPS guidance is up only fractionally. I'm wondering if you can comment about whether there are any assumptions for Samsung accretion or dilution that are embedded in your Q4 guidance or how specifically you might be thinking about component costs or other operating profit forces at work on Q4. Because I think just at a high level, given that revenue should grow between Q3 and Q4, I probably would've expected a little more EPS upside.

So first on the Samsung part of your question, Toni, we don't expect that Samsung is going to close until calendar Q4, so we do not expect it in our fiscal Q4. And so I think that's important. It will be -- Q4 will be without Samsung. And then in terms of kind of the puts and takes of the sequential view, probably, the 2 biggest things to call out, first is commodity costs. We do expect commodity cost to go up sequentially, and so that will be a bit of a headwind. But probably, the bigger impact is just the opportunity that we see to place more positive NPV units. And so that's really what is kind of the biggest impact sequentially on EPS -- I'm sorry, relative to normal seasonality.

The next question will be from Shannon Cross of Cross Research.

Can you talk a bit more about the underlying dynamics of the supplies revenue growth you saw and that you're expecting? And specifically, I'm thinking about, between ink and toner, how the growth in Commercial print, which is mainly ink, is maybe mixing it a little bit toward ink. I don't know if that doesn't work because of the offset of Consumer but obviously, with the higher margin benefit from ink, I'm just wondering how we should sort of think about what's going on there below the 2% growth.

So Shannon, I think it's a bit difficult. I don't -- we don't break out kind of that level of detail. What we have talked about is obviously our Commercial. Our Commercial business is bigger because of the usage than our Consumer business. And therefore, you'll see a difference in toner and ink as a result of that. Although just to be clear, some of the Consumer now has our low-end laser in it. So when we talk about our home print system, it includes low-end laser. But ultimately, what's going to drive the supplies is really the 4-box model drivers. So it's really -- it's not ink or toner. It's really about driving across the 4 boxes, focusing on placing the right units, the high-quality units, working on your installed base, working on, obviously, our market share or aftermarket market share as well as the pricing related to supplies.

Okay. And then I guess I had a follow-up on the commodity side. Cathie, you had mentioned you expect commodity costs to actually go up in the fiscal fourth quarter. I know some people that we've talked to are thinking more flat, so I'm just trying to figure out is that a reflection of contracts going off that are going to reset? Or are there specific areas where you think that you're going to need to buy more? And also, is this -- any of that reflected in what's going on in your inventory in this quarter as well?

Sure. So I'm not aware of other views that say it's going to be flat. We actually think it's going to continue to go up but at a slower rate. This is particularly true from a DRAM perspective. And then when you step back and you look at it, kind of Q4 versus Q3, in the course of Q3, the commodity prices continue to go up. So of course, that will represent a headwind for us in Q4. But we do expect some additional increases in commodities in Q4 as well.

The other thing I would add to that, Shannon, is that staying out in front of these cost increases and being proactive has really worked for us. We called this particular issue well before our competitors and we took very early action here, and we did not get caught behind the curve. The other thing we did is we took some strategic decisions to leverage the balance sheet. We secured inventory as our highest priority, and you heard me talk about that in the last couple of earnings calls because that then at least gives the opportunity for the sales team to go out and reprice our products. If you don't have them because you haven't gone and secured them in a tough buying environment, then obviously, you have not opportunity there. So we're very predictable for our suppliers, that helps them through a time when they have to put up their cost and they were in shortage. And then of course, as I mentioned before, the team went out. The sales team, the category team did an excellent job of repricing the products. And our customers still see a lot of value in the incredible innovation that's going into them.

The next question will be from Abhey Lamba of Mizuho.

Cathie, you mentioned the price increases are impacting commercial PC demand, and that's also the market where we have aging hardware installed base. So how do you think it plays out? Do you think it pushes out demand until prices become more reasonable in their mind? Or will there be pricing pressures where we would see unit sales for that lower price? How do you expect the commercial demand to kind of play out from here on out?

I think you've got to take a several quarter view of the personal systems market. I think the first thing that's important to remember is it's still a $333 billion market, and about 1 in 5 machines have got an HP logo and it's very quickly becoming 1 in 4, we're creeping up there, that the top 4 players including us, in aggregate, grew 1%. And we grew a 5-point premium to that. So the big are getting bigger, and we're growing much faster than the big 4 in total. And that's really off the back of innovation. That's what we're focused on, is delighting our customers and surprising them and amazing them with our products. And I think we have the best product line we've ever had, and that's picked up quite regularly now by third-party reviewers that look at our products relative to our competitors. For us, it's about driving a continuous transformation of the business to more profitable subcategories where we can get value for that innovation. In quarter 3, that paid off again. We did have incredible top line growth of 12%, sequential growth in operating profit as well as share gains. But just recall that share gains are not the objective but rather the outcome. There's no magic pill here. I don't think the markets as they move from quarter-to-quarter ever really are given a magic pill except for when it's sort of like the last month or 2 before an operating system changes over. This was broad based across all categories, all regions. Desktops back to growth as well. Channel inventory, aged inventory, very well managed. A lot of kudos to our team in all the regions in the business unit in the supply chain and the functions. And I think we're in a very good position to compete as we go forward as the various dynamics play out in the market.

And the other thing I would add is that I was asked to make a relative comment and we saw Consumer revenue this year -- or this quarter grow 14% year-over-year and Commercial, 11%. Last quarter, we said that the Commercial price increases were going to take a while to work their way through, and we saw some of that pick up in Q3. So I wouldn't -- I'm not suggesting that Commercial customers are completely sitting on the sidelines at all. I think that with our great product line up, we're certainly able to make the sales that we need to make in that space and get them off kind of the fence.

The next question will be from Rod Hall of JPMorgan.

I guess I had one accounting question for Cathie and then a follow-up to that. So I noticed that the other income expense last year in the fiscal fourth quarter was a pretty big negative number, Cathie. And I wonder if you could just kind of help us understand what that might look like this year and also may be comment on interest income expense, how that -- how you would expect that to come out in the fiscal fourth quarter of this year. And then I have a follow-up.

So let's just make sure we're level set. So what I have is for OI&E last year was a negative $65 million in Q3 and for this year, it's a negative $66 million. So I don't see a real big difference there on a year-over-year basis? Are you looking at a full year basis -- pardon me?

Yes, I was referring to the October quarter of last year. So last year, the October quarter, other income and expense, I see a minus 435. Do you have a different number?

Sorry, I'm not -- I haven't been focused on Q4 last year. I don't remember off the top of my head what happened last. Can we take that offline? And I can look it up and maybe even while we're talking here, I can look it up, but I haven't focused on it.

Okay. Yes, because it's been a big fluctuation last year so I just wanted to make sure that -- just to understand if it was likely to do that again this year from a modeling point of view. And then on OpEx, OpEx numbers were a little higher than we had modeled. Maybe we just mismodeled it in July, but just wanted to understand in the October guidance, what you're thinking in terms of operating margins and OpEx.

I'm sorry, can you say that again?

I was just wondering on the October guidance, if you could talk a little bit about what you're thinking, what you're thinking in terms of operating margins and OpEx and what some of the drivers of that might be.

So the big drivers off of normal sequential performance from Q3 to Q4 is basically the units that we expect to be able to place. We have made great progress in our Printing business on our cost structure, and that is enabling us to go into the market and find opportunities that used to be negative NPV opportunities that are now positive NPV opportunities, and we expect to take advantage of those opportunities. That's the biggest reason for not being a normal sequential. The other is that we do have commodity cost increases that we see in Personal Systems. We don't guide at a OpEx or an operating profit level.

Okay. Since I missed the first one Cathie, could I just ask you to comment a little bit on how far out you're hedged on commodities? Are you guys pretty well-hedged looking forward? Or will you have to add to inventory over time to protect yourself from commodity prices in the future?

So we will -- we are very fairly well hedged in the sense that we have a fair amount of inventory, strategic by inventory, but that's never for multiple quarters or has never been for multiple quarters. And so we will absolutely face increasing commodity cost both in Q4, to some extent, and into '18.

The next question will be from -- and the last question, I apologize, will be from Ananda Baruah of Loop Capital.

Cathie, just going back to the normalized though, about the free cash flow question. From before your comments around sort of normalized not being applicable today as it used to be, do you feel that maybe with what's going on in sort of higher-quality supplies and ongoing traction in PCs that the cash conversion cycle could actually be in the process of redefining itself? And if you think that maybe it is, how would you like us to kind of think about that?

I don't really think of the cash conversion cycle as redefining itself. So this quarter, very pleased with the performance. We had a cash conversion cycle of minus 35 days, which was 5 days better sequentially. But as I mentioned, that was really driven by the incredible strength and sequential performance of the Personal Systems business. Because the Personal Systems business has such a negative cash conversion cycle that when it grows, its growth increases sequentially. You're going to see a fair amount of free cash flow. Similarly, if the growth is less in the following -- in the next quarter sequentially, you're actually going to see a little bit of a reduction in free cash flow. What we expect for this year is that we would do at least $3 billion in free cash flow. So making great progress on free cash flow. And that our cash conversion cycle would likely end the year at a minus 29 days, kind of in line with FY '16's exit. And I think of that more as kind of the range that I would be modeling over the longer term.

So I'd like to thank everybody for taking the time to join us today. The key takeaways I'd love you to leave the call with is the following: we stabilized revenue a quarter earlier than we expected; we posted double-digit total revenue growth in the quarter; we delivered non-GAAP EPS at the high end of our outlook range; and we generated $1.7 billion in free cash flow. We have growth across all segments and regions and sustained success across the 3 time horizons of our core growth and future pillars. And that's really important in the way we're delivering for today, by providing real opportunity for long-term growth into the future. Everyday, we wake up knowing that we need to amaze our customers and partners with the most competitive disruptive portfolio. It's job #1 for us. Very proud of the outstanding execution of the strategy from the team and believe that our very best days still lie ahead of us. I look forward to seeing you all at SAM on Thursday, October 12 in Palo Alto. Thanks very much for your time.

Thanks a lot.

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, the conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.