Good morning, everyone. My name is Beau and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to Harmony Bioscience's Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2024 Financial Results Conference Call. All participant lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speaker's remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. [Operator Instructions] I will now turn the call over to Mr. Brennan Doyle, Head of Investor Relations. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you, operator. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us today as we review Harmony Bioscience's fourth quarter and full year 2024 financial results and provide a business update. Before we start, I encourage everyone to go to the Investor section of our website to find the materials that accompany our discussion today, including a reconciliation of our GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures. At this stage of our life cycle, we believe non-GAAP financial results better represent the underlying business performance. Our speakers on today's call are Dr. Jeffrey Dayno, President and CEO; Jeffrey Dierks, Chief Commercial Officer, Dr. Kumar Budur, Chief Medical and scientific Officer, and Sandip Kapadia, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Administrative Officer. As a reminder, we will be making forward-looking statements today, which are based on our current expectations and beliefs. These statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially, and we undertake no obligation to update these statements, even if circumstances change. We encourage you to consult the risk factors referenced in our SEC filings for additional details. I would now like to turn the call over to our CEO, Dr. Jeffrey Dayno. Jeff?

Thank you, Brennan. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining our call today. 2024 was a year of strong execution and meaningful progress for Harmony Biosciences. We continue to strengthen our leadership position in Sleep/Wake, while advancing and expanding one of the most robust, late-stage CNS pipelines in the industry. Beginning at our Investor Day last October, we outlined a clear path toward becoming the leading CNS Company, focused on developing and delivering innovative treatments for patients with unmet medical needs. That path includes advancing our late-stage pipeline to deliver one or more new product or indication launches each year over the coming years. We remain committed to delivering on our promise to patients, while generating long-term, durable value creation for shareholders. In fact, our current pipeline, if successful, is poised to deliver over $3 billion in net revenue going forward. 2024 was also a year of exceptional growth in both our commercial business and in our pipeline, through strategic acquisitions. Our net product revenues in 2024 were $714.7 million, representing 23% growth year-over-year. In Q4 alone, we generated $201.3 million in net revenue. This momentum is reflective of the continued durable growth of WAKIX in narcolepsy based on its broad clinical utility and differentiated profile as the first and only FDA-approved once-daily non-scheduled treatment for narcolepsy and our proven commercial execution. We remain confident in WAKIX being a $1 billion plus opportunity in narcolepsy alone, and we are on our way to achieving that milestone well before WAKIX LOE in 2030. On that topic, today we are also announcing our first generic settlement agreement with Novagen Pharma, resolving the patent infringement litigation related to Novagen's abbreviated new drug application for a generic version of Pitolisant hydrochloride. As part of the agreement, Novagen will have a license to sell…

Thanks, Jeff. Q4 and full year 2024 showed continued strength in our underlying business fundamentals and durable growth as we surpassed $700 million in net sales and over 7,000 average patients on WAKIX. Net sales for the fourth quarter were $201.3 million, and full year 2024 net revenue was $714.7 million, a 23% increase from full year 2023. We continue to see strong double-digit growth in net revenue for WAKIX heading into year six of our commercialization, demonstrating continual high interest of WAKIX in the narcolepsy market. The solid net sales performance in 2024 reaffirms our confidence in WAKIX representing a potential $1 billion plus opportunity in narcolepsy alone. For the fourth quarter of 2024, we saw continued growth in the average number of patients on WAKIX, and in the WAKIX prescriber base, both facilitated by favorable market access as seen on slide five. The average number of patients on WAKIX increased to approximately 7,100 in the fourth quarter. We're extremely pleased with the approximate 300 sequential increase in average patients on WAKIX from what we reported last quarter. We saw continued growth in pediatric narcolepsy prescriptions and prescribers in Q4, but consistent with Q3, the vast majority of our growth came from the adult narcolepsy, which constitutes approximately 95% of the diagnosed narcolepsy opportunity. The growth in average patients in the fourth quarter was in line with our expectation and reaffirms our confidence in future growth with WAKIX. Fueling the growth in patient ads on WAKIX was the strength of the WAKIX prescriber base. We saw solid growth in the WAKIX prescriber base beyond Oxybate REMS enrolled healthcare professionals, demonstrating that WAKIX continues to expand the branded writer segment of the market beyond the Oxybates. We're now more than 50% penetrated in this segment of approximately 5,000 healthcare professionals…

Thank you, Jeff. Good morning to everyone, and thank you for joining us today. In R&D, we continue to make good progress in advancing our pipeline across 13 development programs, eight different assets, and three distinct franchises focused on rare neurological indications with high unmet medical needs. We currently have four Phase 3 Registrational Trials ongoing in four distinct indications, and we will have six Phase 3 Registrational Trials by the end of the year. This makes our portfolio one of the robust late-stage pipelines in the industry, with the potential to deliver launches every year in the coming years. Our full clinical development pipeline is shown on Slide 8, and the clinical development highlights are on Slide 9 through slide 13. Starting with our Sleep/Wake franchise, as we discussed recently, we received an RTF for IH sNDA. We are deeply disappointed with this outcome. The rationale that the FDA provided for the RTF was based on data from the randomized withdrawal phase of the INTUNE study. However, as we have discussed previously, the data from the open-label phase showed the patients experienced improvements on the effort-sleepiness scale that were about five times greater than what is recognized as clinically meaningful, and the majority of the patients in the long-term extension study achieved normal levels of wakefulness and sustained this response beyond one year. This data, along with real-world data from the physicians treating IH, and a compassionate youth program, as well as the well established safety and tolerability profile of WAKIX, and its non-integrated status made a strong benefit-risk proposition for pitolisant in IH. This is why we permitted the sNDA for pitolisant in IH, because it was the right thing to do for our patients. Our commitment to bring pitolisant for patients with idiopathic hypersomnia remains unchanged. We…

Thank you, Kumar, and good morning everyone. This morning, we issued our fourth quarter earnings release and filed our 10-K, where you will find the details of our fourth quarter and full year 2024 financial and operating results. Our financial performance is also shown on Slides 14 through 16. We finished the year with great momentum across the business, delivering strong growth across several of our key metrics, setting us up for another successful year in 2025. We continue to be a profitable, cash-generating company, able to fund the growth and advancement of our pipeline, fully with the strength of our balance sheet. We delivered another year of double-digit top-line growth as we reported $714.7 million in annual WAKIX net revenue, while continuing to be a profitable, cash-generating biotech company. Our strong financial performance combined with a solid balance sheet, including approximately $576 million in cash and cash equivalents, positions us well to continue advancing our industry-leading pipeline, along with driving continued commercialization of WAKIX and narcolepsy. For the fourth quarter of 2024, we reported net revenues of $201.3 million, as compared to $168.4 million in the prior year quarter, representing year-over-year growth of 20% in our highest quarter to-date. Performance in the quarter reflects the strong, sustained underlying demand for WAKIX. We also reported total operating expenses for the fourth quarter of $91.1 million, compared to $85.1 million in the same quarter in 2023, representing a 7% increase. The growth was primarily driven by our expanding late-stage pipeline, along with investments for the commercialization of WAKIX and narcolepsy. Non-GAAP adjusted net income for the fourth quarter of 2024 was $63 million, or $1.08 per diluted share, compared to $42.8 million or $0.73 per diluted share in the prior year quarter. We believe the non-GAAP adjusted net income better reflects…

Thank you, Sandip, and thanks everyone for joining our call today. As you have heard, 2025 is set up to be a transformational year for Harmony. With a market-leading Sleep/Wake franchise, a catalyst-risk pipeline, and a clear path for continued growth, we are in a strong position to execute on our vision of becoming the leading CNS Company focused on delivering innovative treatments to patients with unmet needs. 2025 will be a pivotal moment in our long-term growth strategy. I am proud of the progress that the Harmony team has made, and we are well-positioned to deliver on our promise to patients while also generating durable, long-term value creation for our shareholders. Thank you again, and I will now turn the call back over to the operator. Operator?

Thank you, Dr. Dayno. [Operator Instructions] We'll go first this morning to Charles Duncan at Cantor Fitzgerald.

Hey. Good morning, Jeff and team. Congrats on a nice fourth quarter of patient ads for WAKIX. Since I'm going to ask just one question, it’ll be multi-part. It's on ZYN002 and the Phase 3 study. Kumar suggested you are pleased with how it's going. I'm wondering if you can provide any color on, I guess, beyond the methylation rates, how do you feel about the range of weight in terms of the patients being enrolled or ages? And then finally, how is the open label extension going? What's been the rollover rate into that?

Yes. Good morning, Charles, and thanks for your question on ZYN002 and the ongoing Phase 3 RECONNECT trial. Kumar, more color on Charles' question.

Yes. Hey, good morning, Charles. Thanks for the question. We are very pleased with the way the trial is ongoing, Charles. We are on track for top-line data in the third quarter of this year. The primary endpoint is in patients with complete methylation, but we are also enrolling a nominal number of patients who also have partial methylation. If the primary endpoint in patients with complete methylation is positive, and if we see a strong signal in patients with partial methylation, there is an opportunity for a broader label. In terms of your question in terms of age, we are enrolling patients in the age group of three to 30 years, and in terms of weight, the weight is variable, obviously depending on many factors, including the age. And one of the things that we did in the RECONNECT study is we went higher on the dose in patients who weigh more than 50 kilograms. The dose is 750 milligrams per day administered in two equally divided doses, that’s 375 BID. In fact the open-label or rather long-term extension study, a good proportion of patients are rolling over into long-term extension study, and we have discussed this in the past. Currently, if you look at all the way back to the patients who enrolled in the very first Fragile X syndrome study, some of these patients are exposed to ZYN002 for over eight years now. This level of persistency is unprecedented in neuropsychiatric trials. It just speaks to the durable efficacy or sleepiness of ZYN002 in this patient population. I hope that answers all of your questions. I know it was a multi-part question. I did not want to miss anything. Thank you.

Super. That's helpful. Looking forward to the data.

Thank you, Charles.

Thank you. We go next now to Francois Brisebois at Oppenheimer.

This is John Gregory Dean on for Francois Brisebois at Oppenheimer. Thank you for taking our questions. I was wondering, why should we feel comfortable that Pitolisant HD has a higher likelihood of success in IH patients?

John, thank you for your question. I think we have data with regards to and Kumar can expand, you know showing dose exposure response with Pitolisant over the years in the clinical trials that have been done.

Hey Franc, good morning. Thanks for the question. Look, I would like to answer this question in two parts. First and foremost, the evidence for efficacy of Pitolisant in patients with idiopathic hypersomnia in general. The INTUNE study clearly showed the magnitude of efficacy. The open-label part [inaudible] compared to what is recognized as clinically meaningful. In the long-term extension study, patients continued to derive benefit one year out, and they were meeting the normal range for the wakefulness. And moving on to pitolisant HD formulation, it's an optimized formulation of pitolisant with an optimized PK profile and the higher dose, and there is a body of evidence from all of our clinical trials that show a clear dose response and exposure response. So based on all of this data, we have high confidence that pitolisant HD will not just be efficacious in patients with idiopathic hypersomnia, but we will see a larger magnitude of efficacy and excessive data in sleepiness, and also impact symptoms like sleep inertia, which is a core symptom in patients with idiopathic hypersomnia for which there are no approved treatments. And finally, the trial design, Franc. The upcoming study which we plan to initiate in the fourth quarter of 2025, will be a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel-arm study. And with randomized with all study design, there are some challenges on how to interpret the data, and the traditional parallel-arm design study will be much more helpful in the interpretation of the data.

Franc, thank you.

Thank you.

We go next now to David Amsellem at Piper Sandler.

Hey, thanks. So regarding pitolisant HD, I want to drill down in your assumption for 2028 PDUFA. There's obviously a number of trials in NT1 and NT2 and eventually the IH for various orexin agonists. So can you talk to how you are feeling about pace of enrollment of your pitolisant HD trials and how confident you are in your 2028 assumptions, given that you are competing for patients? Thanks.

Yeah, good morning, David. No, great question. I think Kumar can give you sort of our assumptions and the plan on the development program.

Hey, good morning, David. Thanks for the question. Yeah, there is competition. Many clinical trials are ongoing, but if you look and compare and contrast the clinical trials in Narcolepsy with idiopathic hypersomia, there are relatively less number of clinical trials in idiopathic hypersomia. And the good thing is, based on the data from the INTUNE study, we have already showed a robust signal, and that will definitely help with the recruitment of pitolisant HD clinical trials compared to other clinical trials that are ongoing or that are coming up. And also, this is a global clinical trial. We just completed idiopathic hypersomia clinical trial, so we have established relationship with the site. We know these sites very well. Our long-term extension study is still ongoing, so we have continued relationship with these sites. All of these things will factor into on how we will recruit for our upcoming Phase 3 clinical trial with pitolisant HD. We are confident in the timeline.

What about competition for patients with Narcolepsy?

Yeah, good question, David. So we are also on track to commence Phase 3 study in narcolepsy with pitolisant HD in the fourth quarter and anticipated PDUFA date in 2028. Once again, I would like to refer back to, we know this space. We have been working with these investigators for a number of years. We know the site, and also this is going to be a global clinical trial. Our partner, Bioprojet, they are very active in Europe. So based on everything that we know about the disease condition, the clinical trial site, the investigators, we feel confident with our timeline.

Yeah David, I would also add, I think we have plans with regard to other regions globally where we are able to sort of access in terms of accelerating that trial, having access to patients and being able to hit our timelines.

All right. Thank you.

Thanks, David.

Thank you. We go next now to Graig Suvannavejh at Mizuho Securities.

Good morning. Congrats on the quarter and the year and thanks for taking my questions. I just want to first congratulate you on the patent settlement which you announced this morning. I was wondering if you can comment what the status is of the remaining patent challenges. If you could remind us how many other patent challenges there are. And also, I believe, in your third quarter, there were upcoming dates potentially even starting next month in terms of litigation. So if you could just remind us on timelines with the litigation and potential kind of next steps there. Thank you.

Yeah, sure Graig. Yeah, good morning. So I think that with regards to the ongoing process, obviously this morning we announced the first generic settlement agreement with Novagen Pharma, and it's one of the seven ANDA filers. With regards to the next steps, I think it's important to remember that both, the regulatory and legal processes continue forward in parallel with regards to the ANDA process. So, while we'll see the ongoing process, I think the Markman hearing as we mentioned is scheduled for March, and that sets up the claims construction, and then followed by the trial, which will take place in 2026. I think, we are beyond the first settlement. We're actively engaged with the other ANDA filers, but obviously we can't comment on ongoing litigation matters, and we'll provide updates as appropriate. But I think what is important to remember, and in terms of sharing the news, that the Novagen settlement really reinforces the strength and durability of Harmony's intellectual property, and I think it also shows how we're committed to vigorously defend the intellectual property on the state, and we'll provide updates as appropriate going forward on the rest of the ANDA litigation process.

Okay. Thank you.

We'll go next now to Ami Fadia at Needham.

Hi. Good morning. Thanks for taking my question. I've got one question and a follow-up. Firstly, just on ZYN002, with the data coming up later this year, it's certainly a focus for investors. Could you sort of frame what would be success for the trial in terms of the endpoints and how much of a clinically meaningful change you would like to see? And can you remind us if the FDA would accept the first sort of Phase 2/3 study, the CONNECT study, as part of the filing package, sort of with the two Phase 3 trials that are required? And then just separately on the idiopathic hypersomnia study for the high-dose, maybe aside from the change in the trial design, what else do you think you need to do in terms of perhaps the duration for which you study the patients, etc., to really sort of tease out the benefit of the Pitolisant in IH? Thank you.

Yes. Good morning, Ami. Thanks for your question. Thanks for your interest in ZYN002. And I think Kumar can address that, so you understand what success would look like on that Phase 3 trial. Kumar?

Hey. Good morning, Ami. Thanks for the question. ZYN002 is our next major catalyst, top-line data readout scheduled for third quarter of this year. Regarding your question about what a successful trial would look like, a successful outcome for this trial will be defined by demonstrating a statistically significant and clinically meaningful outcome on the primary endpoint, which is the social avoidance subscale in patients with complete methylation. In essence, Ami, what we are trying to do in RECONNECT study is replicating the positive findings that we saw in the CONNECT study in patients with complete methylation on social avoidance subscale in this particular patient population. In terms of your question about will the FDA accept the Phase 2.3 CONNECT study data, yes, they will, because at the end of the day, this will contribute to the totality of evidence, not just from an efficacy perspective, but also from a safety and tolerability perspective, and also the extensive data that we continue to generate from the long-term extension study. Because Fragile X Syndrome is a rare condition, what we need is only one adequately and well-controlled study that shows statistical significance. The data from the CONNECT study will be supportive data in our NDA package if the study is positive. Finally, in terms of your question about idiopathic hypersomnia, pitolisant HD, and the trial design, we have a good idea Ami, in terms of the duration of the study and the end point, again based on the INTUNE study. The data from the INTUNE study, granted that the primary end point was not statistically significant in the randomized withdrawal period of the study, the data from the open-labeled long-term extension study gave us a pretty good idea in terms of what to expect with pitolisant in general, and especially with pitolisant HD, which is an optimized and a higher dose formulation. One last thing which I actually missed to say, is you also asked about the clinical meaningfulness. In the social avoidance subscale for patients with Fragile X Syndrome, a change in about three points from baseline is considered as clinically meaningful. I hope I answered all of your questions. Thanks, Ami.

That was very helpful. Thank you.

Thanks, Ami.

We'll go next now to David Wong at Deutsche Bank.

Hi there. Congrats on the quarter and taking my questions. So I had two here. So the first one, just with Pitolisant HD, could you elaborate a little bit more about the rationale and approach to look at fatigue and sleep inertia in narcolepsy and IH, respectively? And do you plan to, I guess, pursue these as co-primary end points? Are you looking for labeled indications? And how does that sort of enhance the overall commercial opportunity? And then also on your orexin 2-receptor agonist, I was wondering about how you're thinking about the first-in-human study there, and would you do what some of your peers have done in terms of looking at sleep-deprived healthy volunteers? Thanks a lot.

Thanks, David. Let me just start and then Kumar can expand. With regards to sleep inertia as a key symptom in patients with IH, in addition to EDS and also in pursuit of a differentiated label, sleep inertia somewhat pathognomonic, if you will, like cataplexy is for narcolepsy. So that is the rationale behind that. And it's also there are scales that are fit for purpose that can address that. In terms of the other thinking around how we'll capture that in the development program, Kumar?

Yes. Hey, good morning, David. Thanks for the question. So in terms of sleep inertia, David, again, we generated a lot of data from the INTUNE study and most of it was discussed at our investor's meeting last year. The sleep inertia questionnaire that we utilized at one of the end points in the INTUNE study showed a pretty good response, and the response was sustained beyond 13 months in a vast majority of the patients. So we know Pitolisant works in sleep inertia, and we know we can capture that improvement via sleep inertia questionnaire. In terms of your question on how do we want here the label, of course the goal is always to get it in the label, differentiated label with Pitolisant HD in patients with idiopathic hypersomnia. Regarding your question on Orexin receptor agonist, based on the preclinical data, the potency, the selectivity, potential for quantitative dosing, novel chemical structure, good preclinical safety and efficacy data, we believe this is potentially a best-in-class Orexin receptor agonist. We are on track for IMPD submission in the middle of 2025 this year, and we will pursue first-in-human studies in the second half of this year. In terms of how we do that, the goal is to have a nimble and an accelerated clinical development program to make sure that we have the right data set as we move from one phase of development to the next. We will definitely leverage some of the lessons from other development programs, which are slightly ahead of us. In terms of details, whether healthy volunteers, sleep-deprived healthy volunteers, directly to patients, that's something that we will disclose in due course of time as we approach those clinical trials.

Thanks, Kumar.

Thank you. We go next now to Ash Verma at UBS.

Great. Thanks for taking my question. So I wanted to ask about the orexin pipeline asset. There's some emerging literature that is pointing that agonizing orexin can accelerate Alzheimer's pathology, and this has been shown in preclinical and clinical models now. So I wanted to understand, like how do you think about this as an effect on your program, and would that be at higher doses? And lastly, is that something that would be on the radar of the FDA? Thanks.

Hey, Ash. Good morning, and thanks for the question. Ash, this is something that used to be discussed many years ago, because in some of the preclinical experiments, there was some increase in tau proteins in the cerebral spinal fluid in the preclinical experiments. That had more to do with the orexin-1 receptor agonist, but really, what eventually was concluded is it's actually the insomnia and the sleep deprivation that increased the tau levels, rather than anything to do with the orexin receptor agonist or antagonist itself. So this is not something that we have seen in any of our preclinical models, and also this is not something that has been seen in some of the ongoing clinical trials, and some of who actually have long-term data, for example, in the TAK-994 study that was discontinued because of safety issues. So for now, that is not a concern. I don't think there is any level of evidence to suggest any increased risk of cognitive impairment with orexin-2 receptor agonist.

Thanks Kumar.

Thank you. We go next now to Patrick Trucchio at H.C. Wainwright.

Good morning, and thank you for taking my question. This is Luis Santos, in for Patrick. On Pitolisant’s GR, the gastrointestinal formulation, the bioequivalence study is expected to read out this third quarter. What key data points do you expect would support the regulatory submission, and is that regulatory submission still on track for later this year, beginning of next year, for PDUFA date next year? Thank you.

Yes. Thanks Luis, for your question. Kumar?

Good morning. Thanks for the question. We are on schedule to initiate the pivotal bioequivalence study this quarter, and the top-line data we expect to be available in the third quarter. This is a standard pivotal bioequivalence study where we aim to show bioequivalence, which is 80% to 125% of the range, for within the 90% confidence interval for CMAT and AUC. In terms of the PDUFA, we are on track for a PDUFA date in 2026.

Thanks, Kumar.

Thank you. We’ll go next now to Jason Gerberry at Bank of America.

Hey, guys. Thanks for taking my questions. I wanted to hit on two topics today, and this is Pavan for Jason. The first is, regarding the RTF letter for pitolisant in IH, can you elaborate on the specific concerns raised by the FDA regarding the INTUNE study data, and how does this inform the Phase 3 trial for pitolisant HD, which is expected to start in 4Q 2025? Maybe if you can provide some more details on the planned trial design, including primary and secondary endpoints and the planned duration of treatment. I'm trying to get at how this trial addressed the limitations of the INTUNE study and provide more robust evidence of efficacy. And then my second question is with regards to the next-gen pitolisant. Can you remind us what evidence supports the hypothesis that higher doses of pitolisant provide greater weight-promoting efficacy without introducing a saturation effect on H3 receptor inverse agonism? Thank you.

Yeah. Let me address your first question with regards to the RTF. I think that basically the RTF was based on the FDA's review. It was on the primary endpoint. That was not statistically significant when they were looking at the sNDA submission. A very traditional sort of conservative approach to that analysis, despite the totality of the evidence and the robustness of the signal that we've seen. But I think as we shared, really the focus is on pitolisant HD and the longer term opportunity there with regards to the plan to pursue a Phase 3 clinical trial initiated in the fourth quarter, with a randomized prospective parallel group design, which was in concurrence with the agency in terms of the trial design. And then all of the clinical trials with pitolisant and narcolepsy utilizing that design and demonstrating the strong efficacy on excessive daytime sleepiness. So that is the focus there as we go forward, with regards to the IH program in pitolisant HD.

Yeah. Hey, good morning, Pavan. Thanks for the question. Pavan, in terms of the pitolisant HD program as mentioned earlier, we are on track to initiate the study in Q4 of this year and with the potential to do for data in 2028. In terms of the evidence itself, there is a body of evidence from all of our clinical trials that shows a dose response and exposure response with pitolisant. The original trial, original pivotal narcolepsy trials that were conducted by our partner Bioprojet many, many years ago, employed a dose to effect dosing strategy. Therefore, some of the higher doses were never really interrogated. So here we have an opportunity to do that with an optimized formulation at a higher dose and capture the larger efficacy that we anticipate with the higher dose based on the data that we have. We will be doing this without compromising on the safety or tolerability associated with pitolisant. We disclosed data where we did a Phase 1b study where pitolisant was administered up to 180 milligrams in repeat dose study, and the safety and tolerability was consistent with the established safety and tolerability profile of pitolisant. So a really nice opportunity to generate efficacy and safety data in narcolepsy, also targeting fatigue in idiopathic hypersomnia, also targeting sleep inertia and an opportunity to have a differentiated label in both of these indications. Thank you.

Thanks, Kumar.

Thank you.

Thank you. And there are no further questions today. Dr. Dayno, I'd like to turn things back to you sir for any closing comments.

Yeah, thank you Beau. And thanks everyone for your interest in Harmony Biosciences and for joining us on this call today and I wish everyone have a great rest of your day. Thank you.

Thank you very much, Dr. Dayno. Again, ladies and gentlemen, this does conclude Harmony Biosciences fourth quarter and full year 2024 financial results conference call. You may now disconnect your line and have a wonderful day. Goodbye!