Greetings and welcome to the Huntsman Corporation Second Quarter 2021 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A brief question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce your host Ivan Marcuse, Vice President of Investor Relations. Thank you sir. You may begin.

Thank you, Christine and good morning everyone. Welcome to Huntsman's second quarter 2021 earnings call. Joining us on the call today are Peter Huntsman, Chairman CEO and President; Phil Lister, Executive Vice President and CFO; and Tony Hankins, President of Polyurethanes. This morning before market opened, we released our earnings for the second quarter of 2021 via press release and posted to our website huntsman.com. We also posted a set of slides on our website which we will use on the call this morning while presenting our results. During this call, we may make statements about our projections or expectations for the future. All such statements are forward-looking statements and while they reflect our current expectations, they involve risks and uncertainties and are not guarantees of future performance. You should review our filings with the SEC for more information regarding the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from these projections or expectations. We do not plan on publicly updating or revising any forward-looking statements during the quarter. We also refer to non-GAAP financial measures such as diluted adjusted EBITDA, adjusted net income or loss, and free cash flow. You can find reconciliations to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures in our earnings release which has been posted to our website, huntsman.com. I will now turn the call over to Peter Huntsman, our Chairman, CEO, and President.

Thank you, Ivan. Good morning everybody and thank you for taking the time to join us this morning. Let's start out on slide number three. Adjusted EBITDA for our Polyurethanes division in the second quarter was $208 million versus $31 million a year ago. Our Polyurethanes division continued to improve posting 13% year-on-year volume growth and 18% adjusted EBITDA margins. Our differentiated volume which includes our spray insulation, automotive, and elastomers businesses grew by 22%. As a reminder, during the second quarter, we conducted a major turnaround at our MDI facility in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. This turnaround occurs once every four years with many third-party supply facilities carrying out turnarounds at the same time. Downtime associated with the turnaround negatively impacted volumes and adjusted EBITDA by approximately $35 million in the quarter. This was $10 million more than we communicated to you last quarter as several third-party issues delayed our start-up and forced the plant to run at lower rates for an extended period in May and June. The good news is that this turnaround is behind us and operations at Rotterdam have returned to normal. Excluding the impact of the Rotterdam turnaround, our total volumes would have grown at 22% year-on-year as we were essentially sold out on our MDI units worldwide. We continue to see a strong recovery in our Americas and Asian regions with MDI volumes growing 15% and 13% respectively versus the first quarter. Significantly higher margins also drove year-over-year adjusted EBITDA growth in the quarter. Higher average selling prices offset higher raw material costs and unplanned outages. We believe that longer term supply and demand fundamentals in the MDI industry will remain balanced and margins will remain at a fairly healthy level for the foreseeable future. Growth in our core construction markets, including insulation adhesives…

Thank you, Peter. Turning to slide 7. We were pleased to see the continuation of a strong recovery across the portfolio. Adjusted EBITDA increased by $280 million year-over-year and by $45 million or 16% quarter-over-quarter. The improvement in EBITDA from the prior quarter is in spite of an approximate $35 million impact from the extended turnaround at our Rotterdam MDI facility. In particular, we were pleased with the performance of both the Advanced Materials and the Performance Products divisions both of which achieved strong adjusted EBITDA margins in the quarter and where we are investing inorganically and organically to grow these two divisions. The increase in volumes year-on-year is primarily attributed to strong growth since the depth of the global pandemic across the majority of our portfolio and businesses. Variable margins significantly improved leading to adjusted EBITDA margins moving into the high teens at 17%. Sales price increases exceeded some rapid increases in raw materials, which have occurred since the beginning of the year. Turning to slide 8. We continue to make good progress with the integration of our recent acquisitions. A reminder that our Huntsman Building Solutions target synergies have been exceeded and our Advanced Materials acquisitions of Gabriel and CVC remain on track to deliver $23 million of synergies. In addition, our cost optimization plans also remain on track with our program and Performance Products fully completed. In total, we expect to achieve full year acquisition synergies and cost optimization of approximately $90 million in 2021 with a target of approximately $110 million in 2022. Turning to slide 9. We had a use of free cash flow from continuing operations of $83 million in the second quarter, as a result of the extended turnaround at our Rotterdam MDI facility. The Rotterdam MDI turnaround is now behind us for…

Thank you, Phil. I think the results of this past quarter marked a significant milestone and our recovery from the recent calamitous results of the past five quarters due to a global pandemic. The last time we had a quarter of this level of EBITDA was in 2017, 2018 during a time when our Polyurethane business was enjoying unusually strong market conditions. At that time, MDI made up as much as 74% of our EBITDA. I think it is worth pausing and asking what is different today and what more is there yet to come. This past quarter, Polyurethanes made up 54% of our adjusted EBITDA as we see the result of a stronger performance products and recovery in Advanced Materials and the Textile Effects business that is likewise seeing a return to normality. I hardly see the second quarter as being peak results. As I look at the coming quarters, we will see the effects of the completion of our Geismar, Louisiana MDI splitter that will start generating EBITDA in the second quarter of next year. We'll also see the benefits of an additional $20 million of cost savings as we streamline our Polyurethanes business. Our Polyurethanes spray foam business has been constrained due to raw material supply issues that will be solved in the second half of this year. MDI remains well balanced. However, during the second half of this year just over 10% of the global capacity of MDI will be lost due to announced closures for needed maintenance work. This will be taking place at a time when our facilities ought to be operating at design rates and sold out. In our Performance Products division, we saw strong margins and some onetime benefits, but the core of this business has fundamentally changed. We've expanded our customer…

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Frank Mitsch with Fermium Research. Please proceed with your question.

Good morning. And congrats Phil on being named CFO. Peter working through the numbers, it looks like you're expecting third quarter to be better than the second quarter in terms of EBITDA and that typically is not the case with Huntsman. I think you have to go back several years when you find something like that. So, given that you're not anticipating to see kind of that typical seasonality or there's other factors at work in terms of inventories etcetera what does your early read on fourth quarter suggest? That is typically you see even greater seasonality in the fourth quarter? Is this an anomalous year. How should we be thinking about the seasonality impact on Huntsman?

Well, I think that as we look into the third quarter, we will see a little bit of seasonality for the third quarter. We're also going to see the reversal of the T&I or the downtime that we saw in Rotterdam. And when we back that out as well as some of the cost reductions that continue to flow through and the pricing initiatives that we have, I think that we're going to see -- you're right a stronger third quarter certainly in our second quarter. And we'll see our corporate expenses at that time in the third quarter and probably about the same in the fourth quarter about $50 million a quarter. I'll remind you that there is some LIFO charges in that number. And also, we're seeing recovery in our business travel and expenses and so forth just associated with running the business. So we look at that third quarter we feel very confident about it. Again at this time barring a major pandemic closure of the economy or anything, I would think that our fourth quarter is going to continue to be strong. And I think our second half of the year again from, where I sit right now should be a stronger half than the first half of the year. And again that's looking at the present demand trends and so forth. Still very early in the third quarter but I've got quite a bit of confidence. I did mention that we're looking at about a 10% losing about 10% of the capacity in the third quarter. That will also be about 10% of the industry capacity for MDI in the fourth quarter as well, as we see a number of plants that are coming down for maintenance and some of those have been postponed since earlier in the year to the second half of this year. And I don't see a lot of movement from that scheduling or further delays if you will. So, I think in the second half of this year we're going to see some pretty good demand and probably some constrained capacity.

Our next question comes from the line of Angel Castillo with Morgan Stanley. Please proceed with your question.

Hi. Thanks for taking my question. Congrats on the strong quarter. And Phil, welcome as well. Just a quick question on MDI. I'm curious, you talked about the differentiated volumes being stronger in the quarter than kind of the overall segment. And just as you look at those end markets and kind of the mix between kind of the more commodity versus the differentiated volumes curious, if you could give us more color. What are you seeing beyond those volumes kind of going forward? And what does that mean for your margins as well in terms of -- we all track MDI spreads but in terms of the mix that that could benefit?

Well, I'm going to have Tony Hankins, who's our Divisional President perhaps comment on some of the macro trends that we're seeing regionally. But as we look at it globally again, we're looking at an environment, where we're trying to take as much as our more commoditized tonnage and moving that into further downstream. Again, I just want to remind the market that there will be some times when people might be scratching their heads saying "Why aren't we benefiting as much during some of the cyclical upside that you see on some of the more commoditized grades in some of these times of outages and so forth?" But I think we're trying to look at an MDI business that delivers more reliable margins as a better consistent cash flow and isn't so dependent on spot pricing. So Tony, any comments that you have about some of the regional impacts we're seeing?

Yes. Thank you. We're seeing very strong demand right now in two of our three core downstream franchises the Huntsman Building Solutions, which is spray foam. And our elastomers business particularly, the footwear business and the industrial assets business, where we're seeing very strong double-digit growth there right through the second half of the year. But we sold out. We've got an eight-week order backlog in HBS. The good news in that business is commercial construction is starting to pick up and we're seeing spray foam moving into that much more stronger than the past, in addition to the residential construction area which has been very strong as you know with the new home build. So we're very, very pleased about that. Automotive has been off about 10% this quarter because of the chip shortage. I think that's going to ease up a bit towards the end of the year. That's clearly constraining automotive. But we move those products into our -- into other chemistries as Peter, said on the call. Those are the chemistries that things like flexible foam into memory foam mattresses and pillows, where we've seen 35% quarter-on-quarter growth in those areas. So we're very, very optimistic and very upbeat about growth going forward in the second half in our downstream differentiated businesses and we're moving molecules from our component side of the business into those downstream markets. That's the whole strategy of valuing moving from components to specialty where the margins are higher, where the earnings are sustainable and where we're seeing real benefit particularly from the infrastructure build and the climate change investments, which are going to be made in not just the coming quarters but the coming years. So I'm very, very upbeat about these downstream businesses that we serve.

Our next question comes from the line of Bob Koort with Goldman Sachs. Please proceed with your question.

Thank you very much. Peter, I was curious you made a note that you're going to start maybe buying back some stock and also suggested that maybe multiples in the marketplace are a little elevated. You guys have been very exceptional at selling assets. Is there any scope maybe to monetize some more assets and take advantage of those bids? And what will be the hurdle or limiting gate factor on how much or what price you buy back stock would you think?

Well, Bob very good question. And we're going to be looking at on a -- really on a case-by-case basis as we weigh the alternative uses of capital. Frankly, I'd rather see cash going into business expansion and M&A than share buyback. But again it's a pretty simple equation is when we balance that return on capital employed and share buybacks versus M&A. So I think it needs to be a measured approach and something that we're going to be looking at carefully throughout the second half. And it's part of the balanced approach that we have as we've done in the past. Just to remind the market here that we bought in nearly $0.5 billion of our own shares over the last two to 2.5 years with the proceeds coming from Indorama and just cash coming from the operations of the business. I see that continuing. But yes as we look at possible asset sales as I've said in past calls, we continue to look at our overall portfolio. And as we find opportunities where those looking at our business will put a higher value on certain assets that perhaps than we may have internally we'll certainly entertain that. And as I've said in the past again we certainly are not at a point where I'd say that there's nothing for sale within the company. So again that's not to say that we're out trying to sell off divisions or anything. But again it is to say that I think that any company has got to be able to look at where they can refresh and how they can refresh their portfolio.

Our next question comes from the line of Hassan Ahmed with Alembic Global. Please proceed with your question.

Good morning. Peter, I just wanted to focus on the Q3 guidance you've given, specifically for the Polyurethanes business. I mean if I adjust for lost earnings from the Rotterdam turnaround, it seems that you guys are guiding to flat to slightly up EBITDA Q2 to Q3. And then if I sort of triangulate that with some of the comments that I heard, it seems that probably volumes are going to be up and this is all obviously adjusted for the Rotterdam turnaround. It seems volumes will be up in Q3 sequentially. You guys have pricing initiatives in place. So what am I missing here? From the sounds of it, it seems Q2 to Q3 Polyurethane segment EBITDA should be up nicely. So are you guys being relatively conservative with that guidance?

Well, I would never accuse Mr. Hankins here of sandbagging numbers Hassan. But I would put a couple of things in mind. On the positive side, well, let me start with the need on the two areas of concern that I have looking into the third quarter, one of those is going to be the lower number in that polyurethane numbers. We have our joint venture from our PO/MTBE joint venture the equity earnings coming out of that in China. In the second quarter, I think that we had better -- quite a bit, better-than-average-earnings in the second quarter coming from that. And I see that cooling in the third quarter that -- of which is selling propylene oxide and MTBE. As those markets come into better balance, I think that those earnings probably will be slowing a bit in the third quarter. In the third quarter also we're going to be seeing the effects of higher raw materials particularly benzene. Now we're seeing benzene coming off of a recent $4 to $5 high this past quarter and dropping down to the $3 and change area, but remember that, our time of buying the benzene, transporting the benzene, converting it to nitrobenzene, aniline crude MDI working it through our system, typically is about a quarter impact. And so what we saw in raw material increases in the second quarter will be hitting us in the third. So on the negative side I'd say, again, some pressures on the earnings on the PO/MTBE side and also having to deal with higher raw material costs in benzene that we know will be coming working its way through the system. On the positive side yes the T&I is behind us. We have greater volumes and we are going to be pushing for price…

Our next question comes from the line of Kevin McCarthy with Vertical Research Partners. Please proceed with your question.

Good morning. This is Cory [ph] on for Kevin. Looking at the Performance Products segment, we've heard that Huntsman is out with a price increase of $0.08 per pound for maleic anhydride in the third quarter – sorry, effective August 1. Can you talk about maybe some of the price drivers for maleic and maybe the sustainability of those drivers as you see it through the second half and into next year? And maybe could you break that down by region? I think we've seen a little bit of weakening in Europe versus the US and China? Thank you.

Yes. When we look at our maleic businesses, bear in mind, one of the two major drivers there is most products. Raw materials in the second quarter, we saw an average raw material cost for the business across the board just under $1 a gallon. And we see a current price of around $1.30 a gallon. So 30-something percent increase in raw material prices, which are going to necessitate higher selling prices for our maleic to offset that. We're also seeing very strong demand in the maleic, particularly in North America and in Asia. I think that we're seeing decent demand in Europe not as strong as they are in North America and in Asia. But I continue to be quite bullish on the maleic business. I think the fundamentals of it are strong. We're a global leader in the capacity and in the economics and in the technology to produce maleic. And I continue to believe it's going to be continue to be a business that delivers a very strong results for us.

Our next question comes from the line of Mike Leithead with Barclays. Please proceed with your question.

Great. Thanks. Good morning. Question just on the raw material front. I think outside of benzene, the company is a fairly decent sized buyer of chlorine and Epi. And if you look at those products, there's been not only a fair amount of supply disruptions lately but the largest US producer of both products has been pretty vocal that price is only going to go upward moving forward. So just curious, how you think about your security of supply there and your ability to get pricing to offset that.

Well, look, it is a time when as we see the recovery of the global economy, the demand that's being pulled on the global economy that we are going to see raw material pressure probably across the board. I will just note though that, as we are looking into the third quarter into the fourth quarter, we are starting to see prices diminish on the raw material front. Benzene seemingly has peaked in the second quarter going into the third quarter. And typically going into the winter months the gasoline slate, a lot of what refineries produce will also – you'll start seeing a diminishment in some of those values as well. On our epichlorohydrin and chlorine so far I'm not going to comment on particular buying strategies and so forth. But in the area, particularly of epichlorohydrin, there have been some disruptions in – from the supply, particularly from Asia. Those things will be worked through. Look we've been buyers or producers of epichlorohydrin for many years. And this is a global commodity. It's going to move with supply and demand. And that's just the way it is. I think in many commodities in this industry, you sometimes get in those positions where you think prices are always going to stay high and prices will never diminish and economic reality will hit you, particularly in commodities when you've got global competition. So, I think longer term in spite of people trying to lock in long-term prices quote forever, the institutes of the markets will continue to be the same. I don't see any fundamental change in that. When you look -- and also and you look in China, our large MDI plant. We have HCL recycling there meaning that we recycle our chlorine. We're looking at the possibility in the economic models of doing that more widespread throughout the company. And I think as you start looking at technologies, more and more our technologies, not only will be for -- from an environmental point of view but how do we reduce -- how do we recycle and how do we capitalize on technologies that allow us to have better reliability, less materials coming into our facilities and utilize technology to basically make more with less. And I think that that's a trend that we're going to continue to see across the board.

Our next question comes from the line of David Begleiter with Deutsche Bank. Please proceed with your question.

Thank you. Peter, just on polyurethane, you mentioned that 54% of EBITDA today is from that segment. Can you talk about how much of that is now downstream differentiated EBITDA versus commodity EBITDA, and how's it compared to a number of years ago?

Well, I think as we look at that commodity versus downstream, I mean I think it's a little bit -- I'm a bit hesitant to give an exact number on that, because not everything fits exactly in those two buckets. But I would look at Tony Hankins here and say, we're probably looking at somewhere between two-thirds to -- probably closer to three-quarters of our EBITDA is being earned by our differentiated products. Tony, you see that?

No, that's absolutely right, Peter. I think we're very differentiated in Europe. The figure in Europe is higher than that. I think in America, it's -- the Americas is 70% 75%. The Patriot splitter investment is really going to help us move that even further downstream. And in China, it's up 50-50, and that's the area we've got to be more working to really start converting more of that component where we see the spike from the fly-ups into more downstream stable lenses. So, yeah, overall, Peter, about 70%, 75%.

Thank you.

Our next question comes from the line of John Roberts with UBS. Please proceed with your question.

Thank you. Back to the Performance Products segment, Peter. Vegetable oil is also used in unsaturated polyester sort of different chemical route to some of the products. Is the surge in vegetable oil contributing to the supportive pricing there on maleic?

No, not that we're saying that vegetable is a product we follow very closely, and we look at the alternative technologies and usage in those areas. And so -- but, I don't see it having any impact at this time.

And then you talked about some constraints in PU foam volume there. Is it your propylene oxide supply from Indorama, or was it blowing agents or some other additive that might be constraining the PU foams?

Tony, do you want to comment on that?

Yes. John, I think it's a wide range of raw materials. I mean polyols have been constrained, particularly in North America this past quarter, but also catalyst blowing agents, release agents. I mean right across the board, I think raw materials have been very tight, and so things like butane dial, which go into the CPU business. We're hopeful that's going to get a lot better in the second half. But, yes, it's been -- particularly in our Huntsman Building Solutions business has been very restrictive of our ability to really capitalize on the strong growth. So we're working hard to alleviate that with alternative products and remixing of chemistry.

Our next question comes from the line of Mike Sison with Wells Fargo. Please proceed with your question.

Hey, guys. Nice quarter. Peter, the MDI prices in China were pretty volatile in 2Q. And I know the U.S. and Europe was a little bit more stable, but you were able to hit your outlook for Polyurethanes. And given the volatility, why do you think that was the case? Have you done enough in that portfolio to be able to manage the volatility in component pricing? And then, any thoughts on any new industry capacity coming on in 2022? Just if you have any insight there. Thanks.

Yes. And very quickly and if I'm rather quick in my answers over the next couple, we've still got quite a few questions. I know, there's other companies that have their announced earnings, they'll start in about 10 minutes. So if I give rather quick answers, my apologies. We kind of -- I'd like to try to get as many questions as possible. On the Chinese polymer MDI, it remains volatile. I wish we had a crystal ball that could see into the quarter and see where that price is. But I would remind you that pMDI is only 5% of all of Huntsman's portfolio and it's only 10% of Polyurethanes. So if we're getting it right, I think, it's more that we're getting the other 90% right. And maybe that other 10%, I'd like to think we're getting it right, but we try to be as transparent with the market. As soon as we see something, we try to pass that on to the market. On capacity, it's coming on. Look, I don't -- outside of China, in some announcements that have been made, I don't see any greenfield. And when I say greenfield, I mean a brand-new MDI site anywhere in the world. I mean you're looking at four to five years to be able to build such a site. There isn't any even in the planning and permitting stages at this point. Again, there are some expansions taking place on existing facilities and so forth, but I don't see any significant capacity coming on in MDI for the foreseeable future. When I say foreseeable future, I mean over the course of the next several years. Next question, please.

Our next question comes from P.J. Juvekar with Citi. Please proceed with your question.

Hi, Peter, it's Eric Petrie on for P.J. If I annualize first half performance products EBITDA, I get $300 million versus normalized the $200 million to $225 million that you put out there. So is that level sustainable, or do you see kind of normalization in the composites area?

On Performance Products, I see a little bit of seasonality. Third quarter is probably going to be down a bit from the second quarter, $5 million $7 million down from the second quarter, just because of some of the seasonality and turnaround that we have. But by and large, I see it moving in -- second half can be a little bit weaker than first half, but not materially, somewhere in that 260, 270-ish sort of number, be my guest. I hope there'd be some upside to that.

Our next question comes from the line of Arun Viswanathan with RBC. Please proceed with your question.

Great. Thanks for taking my question. I just wanted to get your thoughts on reliability. Obviously, we've had some force majeures here and production discipline – disruptions at some of your competitor facilities. I guess, do you view that positively? And I guess, any comment on your own system? Obviously, there's maintenance going on but do you expect kind of continued disruptions in the industry going forward? Thanks.

I would never wish disruption on any of our competitors. But – and now having said that, I think that, when you look at the configuration in this industry of the size of some of these lines that have been built 400,000 tons sort of lines. It used to be when a line went down you were losing 50,000 or 100,000 tons of material, when lines in MDI line to go down you need a very, very small amount of contaminants to get into that system to put a line down. And when you see a single line now of 300,000, 400,000, 500,000 metric tons and a line of that magnitude comes down for maintenance or cleaning, you are going to see it impact literally the global balance. So I think that's a factor. And the other factor that, I would say is that, as you look at most of these MDI plants, I think our competitors, I think are very, very well built. They're very well – they're very well maintained. But they're also dependent on infrastructure that in many cases around the world is strained. It's older. I look at a lot of the chemical infrastructure here in North America. Much of it, you get these brand-new billion-dollar facilities, and they're being operated with an infrastructure that's 30 or 40 years old. And so it's not just the facilities themselves, but a lot of it is when you see a storm come through, freeze come through something of that nature. You're looking a lot at third-party issues. And look at the outage that we suffered in the second quarter due to the Netherlands was a product pipeline that suffered corrosion that supplied a supplier to a supplier to us. And so I mean, you're kind of like three times removed of an older pipeline that had some corrosion unexpected corrosion in it. So I think as you look at more of an interchangeable and an interconnected industry, I think if anything, I'm not sure that, really gets better. I think, we're just going to have to – maintenance is going to have to be – is going to continue to be paramount.

Our next question comes from the line of Alex Yefremov with KeyBanc. Please proceed with your question.

Thank you, and good morning, everyone. Peter, do you expect typical seasonality in the fourth quarter in polyurethanes and Advanced Materials, or given the trends you just discussed could we see maybe flat Q4 versus Q3?

Yes, I do see seasonality. I mean, there will be the typical closures. Every year for some reason we have this phenomenon called Thanksgiving and Christmas, the New Year's that seemingly slow things down. And yeah, we will see that. I do think that to offset – my only point in saying that, I'm optimistic on the fourth quarter is I think that some of that seasonality will be offset by possible – possible supply shortages, and price increases. And if those things happen then you'll see some of that seasonality will be muted. But yeah, there will be a slowdown in demand, and that's just something that will happen.

Our next question comes from the line of Matthew Blair with Tudor, Pickering, Holt. Please proceed with your question.

Hey, good morning Peter and Phil. You had a press release during the quarter that highlighted your increasing exposure to EV batteries. I was hoping you could just talk about what is your content per vehicle? I guess in terms of pounds for traditional ICE vehicle? And then what would you target for an EV? How much of a difference do you think there will be?

Well, the vast majority of what we're putting in an ICE vehicle today will be in an EV vehicle going forward. I mean if you think about lightweight is of paramount important. Comfort insulation, you want to make sure that you're driving a car that has MDIC not TDI that has no low or no VOCs in its catalyst. I'm just trying to promote Tony's products there. And -- but as you think about what we can be doing here on an EV that does not go into an ICE vehicle, you're going to see areas of the carbonates that go into the batteries themselves. You're going to see even a greater emphasis I believe on light-weighting on the heat insulation around batteries. I think that's going to be Huntsman material. And as we look kind of in that further -- past the next two or three years, take a look at the video that we just released on our MIRALON product that's on our website and on social media sites. And this is -- there are some really exciting materials that are going to be coming out not only from Huntsman, but from our industry that will be doing a better job in light-weighting, in adhesion, in structural strength, and so forth stuff that isn't even on the market. And I'm not talking 10 or 20 years down the road, I'm talking two or three years down the road. But I think it's going to revolutionize a lot and will increase not only the battery functionality in an EV, but also in existing ICE vehicles as well.

Our next question comes from the line of Laurence Alexander with Jefferies. Please proceed with your question.

Just two quick ones. Do you expect your own maintenance costs to go up as a percentage of sales or assets over the next few years? And have you pulled forward any productivity from 2022, 2023, or should you be able to maintain the same productivity run rate?

I think on both of those Laurence we think that the maintenance costs that we have had traditionally over the last 10 years will be consistent over the course of the next couple of years and we'll be discussing this in more detail as we get into our Investor Day and so forth. But I -- look as we sell off more and more of our heavy chemicals and you're maintaining more system houses and our spray foam facilities and so on you just don't -- we obviously spend I think very generously on maintenance. You just don't have the high cost that you do on some of these larger facilities that we used to have. So, as we look at our productivity, we look at our maintenance and so forth, I think it's well balanced and I think it's going to continue as it has been over the course of the last decade. We're going to continue to be very disciplined in our CapEx and we're going to be calibrating that CapEx around our projected EBITDA. We're not going to be cutting any of our maintenance and our requirements in the HNS. But as we look at that 40% threshold it is a very important number for us and there might be some projects that we delay some expansion business projects that we delay. I think hitting that number and maintaining that sort of discipline is very important to this company. And operator, I see that we're at the top of the hour. Why don't we take one more question here? And again, I want to thank everybody for having taken the time to join us.

Thank you. Our final question comes from the line of Mike Harrison with Seaport Research. Please proceed with your question.

Hi. Good morning. Thanks for squeezing me in. Peter, can you maybe give a little more color on the strategic refresh that you referred to in the Performance Products segment. What changes have you made in addition to the $7 million of cost takeout that you completed? And what gives you confidence that you're going to see sustained improvement in that business? Thanks.

Well, I think that we're spending a lot of money and we have a very good product pipeline in that area. If you were to look at this business five years ago, you would have seen a very heavy focus on our surfactants business, a lot of our crop protection businesses and so forth. And this would have been because of the business that we sold two years ago coming up on two years Indorama where that business was largely integrated with an upstream ethane to ethylene, ethylene oxide, propylene oxide and we're taking those molecules. And I think moving those into more of a -- well, a more commoditized market those that rewarded us for volume over value per pound. And now that those are standalone businesses, we're looking at the molecules, we're looking at the technology, and we're looking at how do we achieve through less volume more value. And I think that's going to continue. And as we look at the strength of our maleic anhydride business the -- not just the integration going into UPR, but in other areas as a fuel additive, a lube oil, protective agent and so forth that maleic business is going to continue to be a value to us. As we look at our amines and we start focusing as we mentioned earlier into a whole new area of semiconductors into batteries and electricity and into polyurethane catalysts again, remember, these are the products that are fueling the growth that we are seeing in the spray foam business on the polyurethane side. This is an interdivisional supply channel that we have here and we see a tremendous opportunity to help grow that business at a very strong double-digit growth rate here over the course of the next couple of years. So as we see that, I guess, my point is we're focused more on value on a per pound basis. We're focused more on where we're going to be having perhaps a little bit smaller nimbler business than where we were a couple of years ago, when we were moving mass commoditization and surfactants and so forth. Not that those are bad markets, we're just, I think, they're focused on pricing, technology and execution. And I think that we're starting to see the benefit of that coming through. Thank you very much.

We have reached the end of the question-and-answer session, and with that the conclusion of today's call. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation and have a wonderful day.