Good morning, and welcome to the Q1 Earnings Call for Hut 8 Mining Corp. My name is Cheryl, and I'll be your operator for today’s call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] [Technical Difficulty]

And then jump into a summary of our Q1 results. I'll then turn things over to Jamie and we'll open it up for some Q&A. In addition to the press release issued earlier today, you can find our financial statements and MD&A on both SEDAR and shortly on our website at hut8mining.com. Unless noted otherwise all amounts referred to are denominated in Canadian dollars. I'd like to remind you that comments made during this call may include forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable Securities Legislation regarding the future performance of Hut 8 Mining Corp and its subsidiaries. These statements are current expectations and, as such, are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from current expectations. These risks and uncertainties include the factors discussed in the Company's annual information form for the year ended December 31, 2020. At this time, I will walk through our financial highlights. Hut 8 achieved record level financial results in the quarter ended March 31, 2021, based on the combination of the strong mining results of 539 new Bitcoin and robust Bitcoin price appreciation well in excess of the company's marginal cost of mining. Total revenue was $32.5 million versus $12.7 million in the first quarter of 2020. In addition to our core revenue stream being digital assets mined, we also recognized $1.4 million of hosting services revenue and 530,000 of interest income associated with our Bitcoin lending arrangement with Genesis. We view these revenue streams as strategically valuable and that they provide us fiat currency cash flows, which helps to sustain our strategy to hold Bitcoin rather than sell Bitcoin to fund a fiat denominated operating expenses. Revenue from digital assets mined was $30.6 million, up from $12.7 million in the first quarter of…

Thank you so much, Shane. It's great to have you on Board. I also want to thank all of you on the line for taking the time to join us this morning. I want to thank our shareholders for staying strong and having faith in us during periods of volatility and growth. I also want to thank the Hut 8 team for enabling me to executing my plan to build Canada's next big tech story. For those of you who may not know, I come from the traditional technology space and my passion is helping to create value by driving growth and innovation in great Canadian companies like Hut 8. I joined Hut 8 because I saw an opportunity to transform and drive innovation at a cutting-edge technology company, sitting at the forefront of the next great technological revolution. My goal over the past five months has been to create a growth in revenue diversification strategy for Hut 8 and bring some value to our shareholders. My focus has been on hiring a best-in-class leadership team to design a master plan to grow shareholder value regardless of digital asset volatility, a plan to drive innovation and corporate growth that puts the environment, our communities and governance into priority view at our boardroom table. We've looked at creative ways to execute on our mission to huddle and earn fiat while building ancillary business lines and revenue generation like growing out our hosting line of business. We started the year by raising capital and paying off our outstanding debt obligation, thereby fundamentally reducing exposure and strengthening our balance sheet. We then leveraged our extraordinary balance of self-mined Bitcoin and initiated strategic partnerships with Genesis and subsequently Galaxy Digital, who are both providing us the ability to earn fiat income on our Bitcoin…

Thank you. We will now begin the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Deepak Kaushal. Your line is now open.

Hi. Good morning, guys. Thanks for taking my questions. I've just got a couple of detailed questions on the results, and then a couple of big picture questions, if I may. So just to start off, Shane, welcome onboard. Just the question on the utilization rate in Q1. What kind of utilization rates are you guys running? And was there any kind of capacity lost that you didn't expect due to either whether in early January or as you were upgrading to new machines?

I can take that one Deepak, and also, good morning, Deepak. We did face some curtailment of energy in February, primarily due to extreme weather conditions that were in Alberta at that time. And I think as you know, ourselves and most Bitcoin miners during peak power conditions, when communities require energy, we allow the energy to go back to the grid and therefore go back to the community. So during some harsh periods in January and February, we redirected power to the grid accordingly.

Got it. Okay. That makes sense, and that helps explain some of the number [indiscernible]. On the cost side to that, I know that you guys have undertaken in the past some cost rationalization on the operation side, and then there's been some more increases with some new executives on Board. Are you now at a fully baked cost structure? Was that fully baked in Q1? Or what can we expect in terms of quarterly costs going forward directionally, if not quantitatively?

Yes. I think, directionally, we have the team in place that we need to have in place.

Okay. And was that – I assume that wasn't fully baked in, in Q1 or would you expect the Q1 cost structure to be consistent going forward?

I think Q1, and I'll defer to Shane on the detail. Q1 had some costs in it that we don't expect to repeat going forward. He referenced some of the share-based compensation items being not expected to repeat at these levels. Shane, I don't know if you have any other detail to add for Deepak on that.

Yes. I was going to add details – the line item I would look to Deepak is professional fees. I do think is for sure heavy. Tanya Woods who joined us a few months ago as well has been leading a thorough governance review as Jaime referenced in her comments. And there's definitely some costs flowing through there that won't be fully repeating, and then the caveat to that as you can imagine. For sure, I need to dig in further with the team and we'll really have a more refined quarterly view going forward. But I expect from a salary and benefits perspective that we're more or less there recognizing that there is in the $1.9 million salary and benefit figure, $1.2 million of that I would truly characterize as one-time in nature that relates to a payroll tax – payments related to vested RSUs.

Got it. And in terms of the direct costs for – that are including gross mining margin to operate the mine, is that fully optimized now that you've severed the professional service agreement with Bitfury et cetera?

I don't think, I wouldn't say we're as fully done yet Deepak. As you know, we hired Jason Zaluski in February as our new Head of Technology and we're still going through all of the nuts and bolts of our operations. So I wouldn't say that that's fully complete yet. And then the other thing, as I know you know, as we've got – we have equipment still coming in from MicroBT over the next few months as well as when the NVIDIA cards come online also over the next few months, that's going to change the cost profile as well.

Okay. That's helpful. Thanks for delving into those details for me. The two big picture questions I have, one is on M&A. Jaime, we've seen a bit of horse trading going on in the market in recent weeks. I'm wondering what your thoughts are on M&A in general from a big picture? How active do you want Hut 8 to be in terms of M&A? And then what are your kind of high level criteria or objectives from that perspective?

Yes. I think, we have to think through that as a team, so I wouldn't be comfortable commenting on that at this point, Deepak.

Okay. And then I'll just jump to my last one then. I'm just curious on good comments and thoughts on the carbon – carbonization or decarbonization of the mining industry for crypto. I'm looking forward to seeing how you guys innovate through that. When I think about costs like interim costs, like carbon taxes and carbon credits, are those something that you guys will impact your financials in the near-term? How should I think about that in the near-term as you move towards a more fully carbon neutral footprint?

I think it's too soon to give you that answer with any definition Deepak, but certainly, as we look at our expansion with Validus Power, we expect our costs associated with carbon to be much more controlled.

Okay. So I'll put those questions on the shelf then, and as you guys evolve with the new team and the new thinking, I'll come back with those. Thanks again.

Yes. Absolutely. Anytime, Deepak. Thanks.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Brett. Your line is now open.

Thank you.

Good morning, Brett.

Good morning, Jaime. Hope all is well, and you had a good weekend with your family. I'll start with a few questions around expansion. Has there been a full transition from Slushpool to Foundry or mining at this point? There was that announcement. Has that been fully transitioned at this point exiting the quarter?

Yes. We're fully transitioned to Foundry and the Foundry is our largest pool, so the majority of our hashrate is in the Foundry pool, but we also have some with Luxor. As I hope you saw the announcement of us in the Luxor pool and that also plays into our intention to mine Ethereum with the new NVIDIA card purchase. So we'll use the Luxor pool to mine the Ethereum network, but initially to continue to settle in Bitcoin through that pool.

Great. And the other question around expansion with NVIDIA, is it a fully baked in rackable solution that you're getting from NVIDIA? Or are you partnering with some other system integrator to do the build out in the summer for it with the NVIDIA GPUs?

All that has been announced so far that the actual direct purchase of the NVIDIA cards that we've purchased from NVIDIA and we're still sorting through the further details associated with that program.

Okay. So there could be some more CapEx – like more CapEx on that build out then once it gets fully integrated operationally over the course of the summer?

Yes.

Okay, great. And then I guess another metric – operational metric that I'm looking at because a lot of other mining miners do it in terms as an example, is they kind of do a petahash per megawatt. Do you know what your current kind of expectation is for that, for efficiency once you get the new expansions in place, like what the petahash per megawatt would be? If you have that metric or maybe you would move towards that for shareholders so they understand where your expansion is in the efficiency.

Yes. So we don't have that metric. And as you know, the GPU mining equipment is measured in gigahash. So we do need to sort through how we kind of represent those two metrics. So I can't answer it today, but it is something that we're sorting through and we'll work to have for our next earnings results.

Sure. Okay. And I'll just follow-up with one more item. With regard to current capacity, I know there is indications on that you have nine institutional Blockboxes in effect. Are those like new build out Blockboxes? Are they – like with those institutional clients that are outside of in-house mining? Are those recent expansions? Because I believe 94 is what you currently indicated in-house and those nine would be separate from the 94 that you have in terms of Blockbox data centers.

I think about it more in megawatts, so we have 109 megawatts actively in production, a 100 megawatts being used for self-mining, all currently ASIC-based and nine megawatts being used for hosting.

Okay. That's it. Thank you, Jamie.

No problem anytime. Thanks, Brett.

Thank you. Our next question comes from [Luke Cunningham]. Your line is now open.

Good morning, Luke.

Good morning. I want to thank you personally as a shareholder. The team that you've created is I believe second to none even with this 104 price. And we're holding on tight. And I just want to again, thank you because our TSFAs are showing up really good and I see green in more ways than one for Hut.

Thank you, Luke.

I'll let you get back to your job. Keep driving the shift forward.

That's so sweet. Thank you for taking the time this morning.

Yes. You’re plagued with a lot of wonderful problems, but you're handling them very, very well. I think the team is marvelous.

Thank you so much. I really appreciate it.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Kevin. Your line is now open.

Good morning.

Good morning, Jamie. Thank you for taking my questions. I appreciate it. Could you just give us a little insight on the Whatsminer, the M30Ss that are coming in? Are you going to replace existing equipment? Just some insight on that?

Yes. So initially we will replace existing equipment because we are at maximum power capacity. But as you know, we're looking to stand up the initial 35 megawatts of the new sites through our partnership with Validus this fall. So we will monitor the conditions in the environment and see what the productive life is of the equipment that we take offline to be replaced with the MicroBT units over the next few months.

Okay. With regard to Validus, where do you think you're going to go? I mean, do you have land established for that? How should we think about sort of the footprint there and the infrastructure build?

Yes. So we haven't announced the exact location yet, but I can tell you it will be in the Province of Alberta.

Okay. So that'll make it easier from an operational perspective given…

Yes.

Okay.

Yes. Exactly. It will allow us to continue to take advantage of the tech shop that we have. I think, as you know, we do our own onsite repair and maintenance of our equipment. We've got an onsite tech shop in Medicine Hat, which also does the repair and maintenance for our equipment in Drumheller. So again, we see a lot of value driving continued economies of scale by remaining in Alberta. And we love obviously the province, the climate is incredibly favorable for Bitcoin mining, and the local government again very supportive of this kind of innovation in the province. So we're really, really happy just to continue to expand in Alberta and work with the team there.

Well, thank you for giving us more insight on your growth trajectory. That's very helpful. Just a little bit of more help on the timing. I know you've talked to the fall timeframe, but do you think that's before the end of the third quarter? Or how should we think about that?

No. I think it's – we're working through – obviously, there's a lot of detailed planning to go into this – standing up this initial incremental 35 megawatts. So I think a reasonable expectation would be the October, November timeframe. But as I say, we're still very much going through detailed planning exercise right now.

Okay. Can you speak to the pool fees at Luxor? I'm not familiar with that one. And how they might compare with Foundry?

Both Foundry and Luxor pool fees highly competitive in the space and have provided significant savings from what we've paid historically.

At slush? Okay. Thanks so much, Jamie, and welcome aboard, Shane.

Thanks Kevin.

Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question comes from [Manbar Singh]. Your line is now open.

Good morning, Manbar.

Good morning, Jamie. How are you?

Okay. Well, thank you.

All right. Thank you. Jamie, I was just wondering, can you provide some insight on the Validus deal in terms of – you guys have a 100 megawatts that you guys are going to be taking on. You provided information on consumption for four of those megawatts with the recent NVIDIA purchase. Can you just fill us in on the other 96 megawatts water expansion plans?

As I just said with Kevin, we're working through standing up the initial 35 megawatts, so that 35 megawatts is what we are looking to stand up later this year, and then we will build a path for there. So this arrangement with Validus gives us up to 100 megawatts and we do need to work through the timing associated with that full build out, but the first 35 will come this fall.

Okay. Sorry, I had missed that. Is there any more information you can provide on the Validus deal in terms of how the profits or the generation of BTC is going to be divvied in terms of the supplier of the flare gas Validus and yourself. Is there any information? I mean, we have very limited information on this deal so far.

Yes. So there's quite a bit of information provided in the MD&A that was released this morning, so I encourage you to look to that. It's really – there's not a split involved of Bitcoin, so it's more of a typical power purchase agreement, although we do have – we've got a rate buy down element in it so that our effective rate will be incredibly competitive. So if you don't include the rate buy down, the rate is less than C$0.03 inclusive. So we're really excited about this partnership and we pay energy costs as we traditionally would.

Well, I didn't know its C$0.03. That's really good actually. A follow-up question from yesterday's update regarding NASDAQ. It said there's plans since you've applied since March. Has there been any back and forth? Where are we at right now? How long do you anticipate for us to get a better answer on that of successful listing, unsuccessful listing? When do you anticipate to share that with shareholders?

We anticipate as we get concrete information that we can continue to share, we will. At this point, I can't give any further guidance than what was released yesterday publicly.

Okay. That's all for me. Thank you.

My pleasure. Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Sally. Your line is now open.

Hi, Jaime, and the rest of the team. Thanks for the meeting. I have a couple of questions. I'll start with the first, is around the communication strategy for the corporate. We have been observing recently that there is a lot of voice around institution service kind of strategy for the corporate, and that comes with a kind of a specific treatment that eventually go around information protection when it comes to the NASDAQ, when it comes to other aspects of the corporate. I'd love to understand how do you see this moving forward for the corporate from the past four months, given the fact that up until recently, I think still majority around retail investors? And again, the sentiment on the market is that lots of information such as the NASDAQ listing should have been communicated regularly to the people, although we do understand that there is a limitation around the regulatory constraints for the information to be shared. So I'd like to take your views around that.

Yes. So my views around that are, look, we very much err on the side of conservatism and we want to make sure that when we're communicating, we're confident in what's being communicated. And we really look to the leadership of the larger publicly traded technology firms, and we're trying to model much more kind of conservative traditional approach to how we interact and how we disseminate information.

The second question would be around the timelines accuracy. If I may, when initially the MicroBT announced, it was announced for six months and today's announcement for MD&A, it was said in August, which is almost an eight months kind of a thing. And it's becoming a kind of a thing that timelines do extend. I do understand that so far, for example, for NVIDIA with given some of which is a period of time, it's not even a month kind of a thing. So how would you see the communication around those kinds of things? The major event that eventually are being tracked by investor in order for us to size the potential gains for the corporate by the event happening. And with this slippages in the timeline, how do you think the communication could have been driven or could happen? So we can at least have a clear figure around when things would happen given the fact that they are communicated to us early on?

Right. So NVIDIA, we've communicated that we expect all of the equipment to be up and hashing by the end of August. And then with respect to the MicroBT equipment, the first batch of 400 units was delivered in February and the balance we expect to be up and hashing by the end of July. So the six-month window being February through July. As you know, we do have to work very closely with the supply chain given the constraints that exists in the supply chain, but we are confident based on our most recent communications with our partners that the end of July is still the timeframe that we should expect. And we are expecting deliveries over the next few weeks.

That's super. I would go back as a follow-up question to the earlier question asked around the operational costs. We could see that there is an increase on the investor and public relation costs, regulatory costs, and what would drive regulatory costs to increase and public relations given the fact that we haven't seen much being done on both fronts?

So I would answer that, obviously, as we look, we've gone through the process of working with NASDAQ. There's incremental regulatory cost associated with that. And with respect to – we've actually done quite a bit of work with respect to marketing and public relations. As you would see through what's been happening on social media, we've been incredibly much more active in interactions with the media and a variety of different events. So that's where those costs can be related to.

That's super. The next question is around the estimates again. Initially on, I think February 16, the company did announce that it can generate given the current capacity and network conditions around 6.8 Bitcoin per day. On 24th announcement, it was only a 6.1, in today announcement with the quarterly results for the quarter, I think it was 5.9 Bitcoin per day. And for the period between March 24 and May 12, it’s even I think 5.8.7 or 8, which is less than 6.8, given the fact that on the period after March there was reduction on the difficulty given what happened in China. So we thought that eventually there'll be an increased productivity for the month of April. How would you comment on that given the fact that the number was given initially of around 6.8 Bitcoin per day?

So any time those numbers are put out, they are based on the economics of the day at full capacity, but as you know, those are variables that change on a daily basis. There are impacts to powers. We spoke earlier about moving power to the communities when they need them for peak power purposes. So ideal conditions don't always exist then, of course, we have seen a lot of movement both up and down on the difficulty side. So it's really – you kind of – you need to run the estimates almost on a daily basis given what's happening in the broader environment. So they're very much for guidance purposes only, and they absolutely fluctuate on a daily basis based on what's actually happening in the field.

But don't you see the disperse between 6.8 and 5.9 big given the overall conservatism on the way that the corporates is being run. Because I thought when 6.8 was announced initially that this was the conservative kind of thing given that as we established initially, we are following a very conservative kind of permission. So – I think on the communications side.

Yes. I believe that was an estimate on a day. And again, we very much cancel that the estimates need to be made directly by investors using all of the variables and information publicly available.

Yes. That's great. The next question is around the ESG score. Should we expect something around an ESG score for the corporate given that the recent announcement around the appointment of sustainability head, because again, lots of…

Yes. So Ronnie just joined us a few weeks ago and he's working very, very hard at establishing baselines and objective data that we can then set targets against. And as these programs get built out, we'll absolutely communicate them. But our first step, obviously was hiring and dedicated resource to focus on this area for us and establish objective measurements that we can then build programs again. So that's all very much a work in progress.

That's super. The next question is around the strategy. Today, we are having 2,000 coin on yield accounts of the Genesis. Given the announcement today, we have 1,500 coins, hypothetically sitting either. So what's the plan – why don't this kind of agreement to the Foundry eventually ended up everything on a yield account. What's the corporate view around the number of coins, which are significant 1,500 that has to think seemingly idle for now?

Well, I think it's great that our shareholders are so excited about this pivot that we've made to start to earn yield on Bitcoin. This is something that only we started doing it in January as you know. And it's an area that, obviously Shane has only been with us now for a few weeks as well. But certainly on Shane's list of things to dig into is how can we best continue to put our Bitcoin to work and generate yield, while it continues to accumulate in value on our balance sheet assuming that Bitcoin appreciates in value itself. So I can't answer what Shane is going come back with. But it's great to hear that you support the strategy that we've employed to start generating yield with that balance, and certainly it's something that we'll look into further under Shane's tenure.

That's super. My last question is around the blockboxes. With the agreement – just to understand, for any new expansion now that you are going to have, would we need to have another set of blockboxes from Bitfury or would we have this part of the Validus agreement that they will be building the data centers within which the miner would be working? So I'm not so much – sure how to understand around the blockboxes future. Are they going to continue with us part of the infrastructure for the mining?

So yes, we do really like the container-based system for our data centers. And we are looking at what we would want to do as far as purchase of incremental containers for the new site. We do have some containers that due to the better efficiency of some of our newer equipment, it's actually freed up some container. So we'll be able to move some of our existing containers that are no longer needed at our Drumheller and Medicine Hat sites, they'll be able to move to the new site. So we will be able to repurpose some of our existing containers for that. But future expansion where new containers are required, we will look to industry partners and explore the different solutions now available for new containers.

Thanks a lot for your patience. And I would like also to thank the IR team. They have been very responsive with all the messages and communications that we have been sending. And if I may talk on behalf of everyone, I think the whole team is performing very great. And we are watching for each separate announcement that you guys are doing. We are watching for you. And hopefully we will waiting for the next quarter, meeting to see another impressive results hopefully.

Amazing. Thank you so much for your support and your – your compliment that really means a lot and thank you for your time this morning.

Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question comes from [Zach Woods]. Your line is now open.

Good morning, Zach.

Good morning, Jamie. Hi, everyone. I just wanted to ask a quick question on what your plans were for your fleet upgrades. Will legacy miners be sold at premiums during the bull market? Or will you hold them in storage until your energy infrastructure is built out to accommodate them?

So we're actively exploring all of those options. And I can't answer it today because we haven't made a decision.

Okay. But could you speak on – would you – if the price was right for those miners?

Are you making me an offer, Zach? I think you're trying to buy something from me right now.

If you're open for it, sure. But [indiscernible] pretty high, I think I might wait for the bear market to buy any more miners.

So Zach, you think of bear markets coming? Do you?

Bear market is always coming. Just don't know when.

Well, I'm not a seller of equipment today, Zach, unfortunately.

Okay. Well, that's good to know too. All right. Thank you guys.

Of course.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Mike Richard. Your line is now open.

Good morning, Mike.

Hey. Good morning. Jamie. I just have a quick question for you. I remember hearing you talk earlier in January and February, you wanted to be the gold standard and you were trying to diversify your revenue streams away from mining. And just wanted to hear any thoughts or any plans you have ongoing?

Not away adjacent to mining. Mining is absolutely core to our business, but as you know, we do have the hosting line of business. We've also expanded on the yield side now. So I think you're up to speed with how that diversification is starting to play out. And it's still very much in support of our core strategy being mining. The other strategic nuance for us, which is new is, of course, expanding into GPU-based mining and starting to mine the Ethereum network, which we think gives us a great opportunity for incremental optionality and diversification away from just being tied to the Bitcoin network and Bitcoin mining economics associated with ASICs directly. So I think it's been a very busy four months as we've announced different portions of how that strategy is actually being executed against.

Yes, indeed. I do like the execution. I do like – I think the CMPs will provide value. I was just – maybe I was making an assumption. I really thought you guys would try and diversify away from mining, keep it like core, but try to do some other types of revenue streams or try and even out the revenues throughout bull cycles and bear cycles. So is there nothing at all in that plant could diversify away from mining?

So hosting is a different type of revenue right. So I think we'll continue to look at where we can grow on the hosting side of the business. And then I think the best way for me to answer is, again, it's – I've only been here five months. I think we've done a lot in the area of diversification as I've just kind of rattled off again. And I can't speak to what we might do next. But I believe we're charting that path through the execution you've seen so far.

Okay. And one last question I have, what is Hut’s competitive advantage versus its peers for mining? Obviously the Bitcoin mining economics means that as long as there's like the profits to be made in mining, the network hashrate always goes up, right? People put on more and more machines. So the business model is – you need to continuously add capital to upgrade your fleet just to maintain your percentage of the whole network, right? So let's say you had 1% of the whole network, like, I think you almost had last year, but if the Bitcoin network doubles, you essentially only have 0.5% of the network hashrate. So effectively Bitcoin mining, you always need to spend capital just to maintain the same network hashrate. So how does Hut create excess value for shareholders moving forward compared to other companies?

Yes. So I think it kind of points back to what we just talked about. We're really proud of having the largest self-mined Bitcoin balance of any publicly traded miner. So all 3,500 of our Bitcoin or Bitcoin that we mined and we're actively putting to work through the yield account as we've talked about, and then again, our pivot – our strategic pivot with the NVIDIA purchase and going into CPE mining gives us optionality to mine other networks. And again, as I think you know, our expectation of the 10,000 cards that we purchased from an NVIDIA from a power usage perspective, we expect that whole kind of fleet, if you will, to use less than four megawatts of power, and it gives us optionality to mine. Obviously we're going to start with Ethereum, but there are other networks that can be mined as well. And it gives us the opportunity for some optionality and diversification away from being tied exclusively to the Bitcoin network economics.

Okay. And to kind of go further on that, let's say you want to start mining Ethereum, obviously the most profitable right now. But let's say they go proof-of-stake in a year or so. What are the margins on just doing typical data center work for that side once you switch over to that eventually?

Well, so I definitely would point you to our FAQ and if Ethereum goes, proof-of-stake partway through next year. We would look at something like Ethereum Classic, which is also very profitable in today's economics. So that's kind of the optionality there. We aren't just tied to Ethereum, when we make this investment in the GPU mining cards, and that's one of the things that's really compelling about it.

Okay. Well, thanks for answering my questions.

Well, anytime. Thanks for joining this morning.

Thank you. And we have a follow-up question from Manbar Singh. Your line is now open.

Hey, Jamie. Sorry, I forgot to ask one more question. It's regarding your share price actually, since about 10 weeks ago, I'd say almost all miners have relatively gone down. Your biggest competitor from what I see is probably Bitfarms just because they're on the TSX as well. Comparatively speaking, we've lost about 65% of shareholder value. What are your plans aside from what you said to kind of correct that and get us back on our feet?

Well, you certainly know all of my plans.

I know, is there anything that you can – any other information you can provide because I mean, it kind of feels like we're in the bear market right now as a shareholder?

Look, unfortunately, I can't give you any incremental information over and above everything that we've shared today. Obviously our NASDAQ intention announcement yesterday we think is important, and we will continue to work to drive long-term value. And that's the way we're really looking at making decisions on how we make investments, how we look at the growth of the business. It's all about the long-term health of the business and long-term value being that we look to create for shareholders.

Do you anticipate future dilution in order to raise capital to further expand?

I can't speak to that at this point in time.

All right. Thank you.

No problem. Thanks again.

And speakers, we have no further questions in queue at this time.

Thank you, Cheryl, and thank you again everybody for joining this morning. I look forward to speaking to you again soon.

Thank you, ladies and gentlemen. This concludes today's conference. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.