Good day, and welcome to the Second Quarter 2025 Howmet Aerospace Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Please note this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Paul Luther, Vice President, Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Megan. Good morning, and welcome to the Howmet Aerospace Second Quarter 2025 Results Conference Call. I'm joined by John Plant, Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; and Ken Giacobbe, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. After comments by John and Ken, we will have a question-and-answer session. I would like to remind you that today's discussion will contain forward-looking statements relating to future events and expectations. You can find factors that could cause the company's actual results to differ materially from these projections listed in today's presentation and earnings press release and in our most recent SEC filings. In today's presentation, references to EBITDA, operating income and EPS mean adjusted EBITDA, excluding special items, adjusted operating income, excluding special items and adjusted EPS, excluding special items. These measures are among the non-GAAP financial measures that we've included in our discussion. Reconciliations to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures can be found in today's press release and in the appendix in today's presentation. In addition, unless otherwise stated, all comparisons are on a year-over-year basis. With that, I'd like to turn the call over to John.

Thank you, PT, and welcome, everyone. The results for the second quarter were strong. Revenue growth increased 9% year-over-year compared to 6% in the first quarter, and the revenue broke through $2 billion to $2.53 billion and exceeded the high end of guidance. The revenue growth enabled us to carry out the costs of the additional headcount as we prepare for the new capacity coming on at the end of 2025, notably for turbine airfoils and the IGT build-out during 2026 and 2027. EBITDA margins were healthy at 28.7%, up 300 basis points year-over-year, which was excellent given the significant sequential revenue and EBITDA growth. EBITDA was $589 million. Free cash flow was also healthy at $344 million. This cash flow enabled share repurchases of $175 million in the quarter to total $300 million in the first half with an additional $100 million already completed in July. Additionally, debt repayment was $76 million. We also announced an increase in the common stock dividend to $0.12 per quarter starting in August. This is a 20% increase quarter- over-quarter, which builds on the significant increases in 2023 and 2024. Lastly, earnings per share was $0.91, an increase of 36% year-over-year. In terms of business segment commentary, Forged Wheels continues to do well with a 27.5% margin, a slight increase on the first quarter. Additionally, Structure printed another solid quarter with EBITDA margins above 20% the exact number being 21.4%. Lastly, Howmet incrementals were above 60% year-over-year. I'll now pass the call to Ken to comment specifically on market sector performance and provide business segment commentary.

Thank you, John. Good morning, everyone. In the deck, you'll notice that we've added Slide 5, which gives you a quick snapshot of the first half performance. But we're going to move to Slide 6 now to talk about the markets. So end markets continue to be healthy with total revenue up 9% year-over-year and 6% sequentially. Commercial aerospace was up 8%, driven by accelerating demand for engine spares. Commercial aerospace growth is further supported by the record backlog for new, more fuel-efficient aircraft with reduced carbon emissions. Defense aerospace growth continued to be robust, printing record quarterly revenue of $352 million, which was up 21%. Growth was driven by engine spares, new engine builds and F-35 structures. As we expected, commercial transportation was challenging with revenue down 4% in the second quarter, including the pass-through of higher aluminum costs. On a volume basis, wheels volume was down 11%. Although down year-over-year, the Wheels team did an excellent job to flex costs and deliver strong EBITDA margin of 27.5%. Finally, the industrial and other markets were up a healthy 17%, driven by oil and gas, up 26% and IGT up 25%. Within Howmet's markets, the combinations of spares for commercial aerospace, defense aerospace, IGT and oil and gas continues to accelerate and was up 40% in the second quarter and represented 20% of total revenue. As a compare, total spares in 2019 was 11% of total revenue on a smaller base. So in summary, continued strong performance in commercial aerospace, defense, aerospace and industrial, partially offset by commercial transportation. Now let's move to Slide 7. So as usual, we'll start with the P&L. Q2 revenue, EBITDA and earnings per share were all records and exceeded the high end of guidance. Revenue was up 9% year-over-year, exceeding $2 billion. EBITDA outpaced…

Thank you, Ken, and let's move to Slide 12. Firstly, Commercial aerospace is expected to continue to grow. Q2 growth was 8% after some further destocking in certain product areas. This growth starts with passenger miles flowing, which has been solid in Europe, a relatively higher growth in Asia Pacific, while flat in North America. Aircraft backlogs are extraordinarily high due to prior period underbuilds and the need for modern fuel and emissions-efficient aircraft to replace the increasingly aged fleet. There have been positive signs for narrow-body builds with Boeing achieving a recent 38 per month build rate for the 737 MAX. We also believe Airbus has achieved 60 builds per month for the A320/321 with some 60 A320s being gliders at this stage, awaiting engines. Wide-body builds have not increased substantially in the second quarter, but are expected to go a little higher in the fourth quarter and going into 2026. The underlying 737 MAX assumption within our guidance today is raised from 28 per month average for the year to 33 per month average for the year and supports a higher expected revenue, which I'll comment on later. Spares for commercial aerospace, defense aerospace and IGT/industrial have increased by some 40% year-over-year and were at 20% of total revenue. This result is positive with a continued first half rate of it being 20% of total revenue currently. Defense revenue was up 21% and is seemed to continue to exhibit this strength during the balance of the year. IGT, oil and gas and industrial strength in the quarter was exceptional at 17% with IGT up some 25% Growth for the combined IGT, oil and gas and industrial markets is expected to be high single digits for the year. And within the combined number, the IGT market is expected to…

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Myles Walton with Wolfe Research.

John, you can comment on the rationalization of products within structures. How meaningful is that? Is it going to be to the margins as well as maybe any headwind to departing from some lines of businesses or products?

The majority of the rationalization has already occurred on this, Myles. And so if you go back to commentary provided in the two prior earnings calls, I mentioned the sale of one business within structures and also the closure of another manufacturing plant, which was in Europe. And those two combined with us probably possibly being a little bit more discerning on order intake has enabled us to continue the momentum on improved margins. So the way I see it is that revenue has continued to be healthy and grow and margins have solidified. And I quite like, again, the conversation doing a revenue increase and margin enhancement and which has played well for the company. The total revenue, which in our structures business was certainly healthy from the defense side, less so from the commercial aerospace side, but that was essentially due to some destocking, particularly in the, I'll say, distribution market where some orders had been cut, I think as I think Boeing, in particular, decided to do some destocking throughout their supply chain. So I'm not expecting significant further rationalizations, but we always remain alert for anything where if it doesn't really contribute in a significant way to improving the business, then we'll always take a hard look at it.

So should we expect the margins seen year-to-date to persist for the second half within Structures at these new levels?

Well, that was our goal for the second quarter. And I will say, yes, we did achieve it. And so my expectation is that we'll hopefully maintain where we are. So that would be a pretty significant increase year-on-year. And you'll see from the guide that we've maintained our margin outlook of EBITDA above 28%. So that assumes that we'll achieve that objective.

Our next question comes from Sheila Kahyaoglu with Jefferies.

Crazy good results. So can you hear me? By the way, my voice is a little worse.

Yes. No, I can hear you well. By the way, thank you for the compliment. I like the word crazy good.

Yes. Very good. If you could update us on the timing of maybe the revenue contributions from the various engine expansions you've announced across aero and IGT as it seems like CapEx is increasing and pulling forward. Is it fair to think, unlike other companies, profitability on day 1, are those sites dilutive to the segment? How do we think about pricing, expected volumes? And just what are the key pacing items for those coming online?

Okay. So we've got two complete new plants, which are being or have been built in the engine segment and two significant extensions. So that's a lot of square footage that we've been putting in place. The first plant that we have essentially completed now in terms of the construction and equipment that has been arriving is in our Michigan facilities. And I'm expecting some outputs from that, that's salable output in the fourth quarter of the year going into 2026. And I think that's going to be important for us, particularly in the turbine airforce market. And that's supported by the extension that we have done in one of our Tennessee plants. So that covers that one. The other two are aimed at the industrial gas turbine market. Again, these are large -- for the large industrial gas turbines rather than the aero derivatives. And that is a brand-new manufacturing plant in Japan for which that construction will not be completed until the end of this calendar year and then facilitization in the first quarter, probably going into the second quarter of 2026 and therefore, hope for output in the second half of 2026. And then an extension of our plant in Europe, again, with similar time frames with -- so the expansion and capitalization in terms of assets which can produce parts really into the second half of 2026 and then with them both coming on full bore for 2027. So that gives the picture across, say, the aerospace business and the gas turbine business. So quite a lot going on, Sheila.

And how do we think about the profitability profile of those coming online?

I'm expecting that any costs that we incur and we've been incurring costs each quarter, you've seen another headcount increase in the second quarter of just under 400 net new jobs into our engine business. Clearly, we're carrying those employees today and essentially, let's say, training and getting ready for production. And so the drag associated with that has really been offset by the leverage of the volume -- increased volumes. And so it's working out. And. I'm hopeful that as those things in terms of launch costs smooth out as we go into 2026, particularly in the second half and in 2027, that those really get better and enable us to hopefully produce an improved outlook for the business, which is also, I'd say, pretty high today. So that's the expectation, and it's a combination of we hopefully reduced labor cost drag and also less production of scrap because obviously, people are still training and using materials, which don't get sold at this current stage.

Our next question comes from Seth Seifman with JPMorgan.

John, you talked about the strength in the defense end market this quarter and expect continued strength going forward. I guess if you could talk a little bit about the contribution of F-35 in defense overall this year and how you think about setting up for the future in F-35 given some concerns about future production rates.

Yes. So this year, I'd point to -- just on the F-35, I think generally, the defense business has been strong with the legacy programs as well. But specifically for the F-35, we've received, I think, two volume inputs, which have been quite welcome. One is that we appear to have arrived at a tipping point when our spares business for our engine products exceeds the OE production. And so that -- which we've been talking about would happen in 2025 over the last two or three years. It looks as though that moment has arrived. And with the increased build, let's assume 150 aircraft per month -- sorry, per year, for the next few years through the end of the decade means that the fleet will continue to expand from its 1,000, 1,100 to maybe 2,000 aircraft. And therefore, again, we see increasing contributions coming for that spares business as we go forward. The second input to the F-35 volume has been during 2023 and 2024, I noted that our Bulkheads division from our structures business, we were receiving input orders well below the Lockheed production rate as inventory was burned off from the, I'll say, excess supply relative to their COVID impaired builds back in 2020 and 2021. And so as that inventory was depleted, we're now running at a 1:1 rate, we believe, relative to Lockheed's production. And we are also optimistic that with the large input of new orders that have been there into Lockheed for the, I'll say, international programs for that fighter aircraft that we'll see solid 150 per year rates through to the end of the decade and beyond.

Our next question comes from David Strauss with Barclays.

So I think you talked about your forecast for MAX for the year, if you wouldn't mind running through your assumptions on your other key programs, 787, 350 and so on. And then a quick one for Ken. Just if you could quantify, Ken, the amount of the tariff drag in Q2?

Okay. So in terms of underlying assumptions, the major shift from previous commentary was that MAX shift from the average of 28 per month for the year to 33. And that basically assumes that we'll consistently maintain rate 38 for the balance of the year, having come off a significantly lower rate in the early part of the year. 787 should be around six average for the year with us moving to a rate seven, I think, in the second half. So sometime, I'll say, during the third quarter or by end of third quarter, achieving a solid rate seven on a consistent basis. And if I say 350, it's the same six until we understand more about some of the relief of the fuselage constraints there. And the other bright spot, which is not really computed at this stage is, while A320, the builds have been solid, we're still unclear about whether that build will be maintained, and that's also really subject to the supply of engines because of the state of aircraft, the quantity of aircraft with no engines at this point in time. So that covers the major part of it. And I'll cover tariffs rather than break the call up. It's -- we gave you some metrics around the gross and net effect of 80 and 15 on the last call. Since then, tariff drag, we think has probably gotten better. So if we ask to name it today, we'd be going a net effect below 15. But again, as I said, it wasn't going to be material for our year. And so if it was reduced, which it is, it is not significant. So that's been good. And tariff drag for the second quarter was -- which is the -- probably the biggest quarter of drag, but again, that everything is sorted out was below $5 million. Significantly below $5 million in the quarter. And that essentially was down to timing of us incurring the cost and us receiving compensation from our customers.

Our next question comes from Doug Harned with Bernstein.

So industrial is now the fastest-growing part of Engine Products. And is the accelerated growth you're looking at, how does that depend on getting long-term agreements in place such as with Mitsubishi? And basically, where do you stand on this process? And ultimately, how do you expect IGT margins to compare with those in commercial aero?

Okay. So let's do with the margin one first is that IGT and aero are very comparable in terms of margins. So there's no dilution at all from that currently relatively higher growth rates that we see. So that's encouraging. And then in terms of agreements, we now have agreements with, I would say, three of the four majors and completing with the other one in terms of the gas turbine area, the big gas turbines. And we've also just completed agreement with, let's call it, the -- not aero derivatives, but something like that with gas turbines in the up to 35, 38 megawatt type of output. And so our business in aero derivatives is also very strong. It's sometimes a little bit hard for us to truly understand when we receive the orders that which is designated for oil and gas or aero derivatives and then those derivatives going into whether it's the, I'll say, marine market or other military bases or oil and gas or indeed IGT. But the growth rate of aero derivative type of size of turbines is certainly becoming very significant. And the way we see it is going to be a really important part of data center build-out of energy supply over the next few years.

Is there any way to say when you structure these agreements, how soon that growth will come from an individual agreement?

Yes. From an individual agreement, we know pretty well the growth that we'll see. Obviously, it's always dependent upon the complete supply chain. It's not just what Howmet does in terms of provision of the turbine airfoils. But assuming that everybody is on stream for those program and those new product introductions, then we have a pretty good idea of when the increased requirements are there. And essentially lines up with my commentary that I provided earlier in the call, Doug, where we are putting capacity in, and we're seeing increments of that capacity currently, but with the majority of it to come on stream really second half of 2026 and into 2027. There's no major step function this year for sure. Lower capacity because when we stepped it up last year, again, it takes a full 12, 18 months for us to be on. And we've been -- as you can see from our CapEx numbers, been increasing that significantly as we've been moving through 2025, and that takes time to deploy. And we kicked it up again by some $40 million by way of expectation in the -- for this year. So it's a significant outlay that we believe will give us good results and good growth into the future.

Our next question comes from Robert Stallard with Vertical Research.

John, last quarter, you talked about your worry beads, and it does sound like you're a little bit more confident about some of the issues like tariffs or the Boeing build rates than you were three months ago. But I was wondering if there's anything else on your worry radar that we should be worried about.

Well, not really. I mean I can't call the commercial truck market precisely because we're not sure whether any, I'll say, volume buys we may have seen from the additional emissions requirements for '27 would result in security of volumes in the next 12 months. We don't know whether those emissions rates will continue to apply. It depends on what the new administration ultimately decides, albeit I think everybody is now prepared for those new emissions by way of equipment. for the truck. So that's one where it's difficult to be certain. We've tried to be on the cautious side of those assumptions. And so thinking that '26 is similar to '25, but could be better. So that's -- the important thing there is we don't think it's going to get worse, and so that's great. Elsewhere at the moment, things appear to be pretty solid in commercial aero given the backlog, defense, aero budgets, particularly Europe, are going up. F-35 to us seems solid, and we know we've got enhancements coming from the Block V coming in 2028 unless that's delayed another year or so. So that is looking helpful. And the IGT or aero derivatives for the data center business is all solid. So I mean, I still have my -- I'm always -- I think I'm worried -- I'm paid to worry about things and providing I do it, then you don't have to.

Our next question comes from Peter Arment with Baird.

Nice results. John, you've talked a lot about in the past about headcount. And basically, I think in some of your plants, you're producing more parts today than you were, say, in 2019 and you're doing it with a lot less people. And Fasteners this quarter added no people and you had great growth. So maybe just talk a little bit about what you're seeing on the headcount and the productivity that you're actually seeing amongst your various plants?

So I think our productivity numbers for three of our divisions has been really solid. That's clearly not the case in aggregate for our engine business just because of all the amount of people we've been recruiting in preparation for the, let's say, future capacity. The underlying productivity improvement, adding in those gross numbers of maybe 1,500, 1,800 people in the last 12, 18 months is obviously, to some degree, weighing on us as we go through this. But productivity for the company has been solid. It has been helped by some of the automation that we had put in over the last, I'll say, two or three years, albeit now we're slightly pausing on the automation given our first for capital really for capacity. And so where we're putting new equipment in, we're trying to ensure that's at a highly automated level. But we're not yet going back and still completing some of the projects that we know we could do just so we can stay within our marks for capital and, I'll say, free cash flow yield as a percentage of net income where we aspire to get to that 90% on average over the period of time. But the important thing is for us to serve the market, gain the market share. And then if we have the opportunity, let's say, in '27 or '28 to go back and focus and refocus on some of the automation and further labor productivity opportunities that we have. So our pass- through is currently let's build and focus on the capacity and share, and then we'll go back and mop up in a couple of years' time any remaining productivity opportunities that we know we have, which we just can't currently focus on at the moment.

Our next question comes from Ken Herbert with RBC Capital Markets.

I just wanted to follow up on some of your comments on inventory levels and destocking. It seems like that narrative has gotten a little more robust here across the supply chain. And you talked about it a little bit in structures. But as you look across sort of your portfolio, are there any areas where you see incremental risk of this if we do see maybe any slower ramp at either Airbus or Boeing on some of their programs? And how would you characterize for you sort of the inventory or destocking risk over the next few quarters?

So one of the things I noted from this quarter was in some of the other aerospace companies that have reported that they had some, I'll say, high single digit or maybe low double-digit reductions and drawdowns in the OE business for commercial aerospace. And one of the things I thought was particularly good for Howmet was that despite us facing the same customers and the same, I'll say, inventory reductions, our underlying growth was sufficient that our commercial aerospace business was still in positive growth territory despite that. And then when you layer in the additional business of spares, et cetera, then we produced what I think was pretty solid growth for the quarter, which was, again, a higher growth rate than we had in the first quarter. So we've been powering through some of that aerospace destocking, which has been occurring. And I can't be certain exactly where I'll say the likes of Boeing is on it. I read that they're going to maintain a healthy level of inventory of parts to guarantee their build. And I'm sure that they will because they need to achieve that smoothness of build. But in the way we've guided forward, we still layer in there the -- some destocking as we go into the third quarter, while still producing positive growth in our commercial aerospace OE business with the spares and the defense and all that sort of thing. And in aggregate, we expect a higher growth. In fact, I think from our guide, you can see that we've picked up the growth rate to maybe 10%, 11% from what was 9% in the second quarter. So that's, again, a signal of that. But obviously, with the absolute numbers, reflecting the, let's say, the European vacations that occur. So solid year-on-year growth, if anything, a slight acceleration in the second half, starting with the third quarter.

Our next question comes from Scott Deuschle with Deutsche Bank.

John, you had some very strong sequential growth in aerospace fastener revenues this quarter, but it didn't really drop through to sequential EBITDA growth at Fastening Systems. So can you just walk us through why we didn't see much sequential profit drop- through on those higher aerospace sales? And is that just tariff recovery lag as you referenced earlier? Or was that something else?

No, the majority of any -- first of all, I thought 29-point-something percent was pretty good actually, Scott. So it's not exactly a number that I'll say, crying about. Having said that, the -- if you look at the tariff drag that we experienced for the company, then in fact, the highest area of tariff drag was in our fastener business. Again, we're expecting recovery as we go through the year. It's more of a timing issue. But if you adjust for tariff drag, then it's easy to get to a number starting with a 3. And so I don't think that's anything to be concerned about at all. I could go on and say, well, there's FX and this that and the other. But there's no point really. The answer is it was a pretty good margin step-up year-on-year. very sensible in terms of sequential movement given that tariff drag I mentioned to you.

Next question comes from Noah Poponak with Goldman Sachs.

I wondered, is there any framework for -- when we're looking at the upward revision of CapEx each of the last two years, how much you pick up from that in run rate revenue or the content gain on the engines and the IGTs where it's happening as a percentage, anything like that? And then how much of a tailwind and when does CapEx become to free cash as you get through that?

Yes. So right now, clearly, we would not be investing and taking up the CapEx without that expectation of future growth. Some of it, I think, is going to come in 2026 and hopefully, further in 2027 as we've obviously been actually further increased that number. And if we've increased the number, it's going to take a full year plus for that capital to be deployed. And so that's more going to affect '27 than what the increase we just put through on this one, Noah. And then in terms of profile, I think we should be in that 4% zone. And I'm still thinking that we're going to have a pretty elevated number in 2026. So this number, which now is in the high 300s. I see that persisting through next year. And then with the, I'll say, volume aspect of that pressure coming off in '27 into '28, and then we'll have more, I'd say, optionality around investment for the automation and further productivity. So compared to where we've been, which was underspending depreciation, we're now overspending depreciation, but we have a very keen eye on making sure that we achieve our conversion metrics. And so we're not trying to get crazy about it and again, being very discerning of where and how we deploy that capital. And just to reemphasize, the point that in our view, organic growth is by far the best for us in terms of return on capital. You can see the equity returns in the company, and that's really an excellent return on organic growth and capital investment in the company. And given the choice of buying back shares or acquisitive steps, then I'm positive that the organic growth and stepping up CapEx is really good for us and will be good for the future. And it's great if you think about it, that we have those opportunities to deploy the capital. I've not given revenue guidance from it yet. If we follow to plan, then I'm sure we'll be talking about the 2027 revenue picture in November when we talk about earnings then. So I'd prefer to defer on that just at the moment, Noah. But say we do see positive revenue growth as we go into '26 and positive revenue growth into '27. And so we're actually really pleased to deploy the capital and have more opportunities than we're actually capacitizing for.

Our next question comes from Gautam Khanna with TD Cowen.

Great results. I was curious if you could opine on pricing expectations next year and perhaps thereafter, if you expect any change to kind of the rate of net increases you've had?

I haven't really talked much on the pricing front, except to say that we maintain the process that we've been going through, looking at wherever we renew our long-term agreements, what the movement in has been by way of volume and variety and those parts, which have gone from OE to supply or OEM service just to service supply. And so we're following that discipline as we've done now for the last six years. In terms of prior commentary, when I gave specific numbers, which I think the last one was in February of 2024, -- and I said that '25 would be similar, if not greater, is the last word that I used on it in 2025 than '24. And my expectation is we'll continue to process and it will be a similar picture going forward into '26 and into '27. So just that consistent movement, Gautam, in terms of price. Nothing has changed for us by way of process nor by way of annual expectation.

Our next question comes from Scott Mikus with Melius Research.

Industrial policy is a big priority for this administration, and we're in a pretty big ramp on both the commercial aero and defense side. I mean just when we look at the forging assets in the country, there's only four presses that are over 35,000 tons in the U.S. They did back to 40s and 50s and you happen to own two of them. So are there any conversations between you and either the DoD or the administration about construction or upgrades to new heavy forging presses?

There has not been, Scott. I think have we missed something when you asked that question. And it's certainly interesting because that capacity and that scale is unique for us. I think there's only one of the maybe press in the world that can do that, I think, in Russia. So, yes, those are pretty important assets and are certainly absolutely critical to supplying the componentry that will be required for, let's say, the new fighter jet, the F-47 and presumably for the F-55 as well as those examples, plus I'm sure some other aircraft parts. So those presses are, I'll say, vital to the defense industry. And so it's a conversation that maybe we should be having with the DoD by way of support. So I guess thank you for asking the question. It's certainly -- I was thinking about that and maybe it's going to stimulate us into having that conversation.

Our next question comes from Kristine Liwag with Morgan Stanley.

John, it's great to finally see 737 MAX production rates continue to improve. And frankly, look, your execution has been stellar. But everyone in the supply chain needs to execute to be able to build a complete aircraft. So as you look around the industry to see where bottlenecks are for the Boeing and Airbus ramp-ups, what do you monitor as potential canaries in the coal mine?

It's very difficult for us to see through the complete supply base of what might occur. I think there's probably other people better placed to do that and maybe including yourselves. The one area which I think is going to be really important for the industry for -- in the commercial area for the second half and going into 2026 is the build-out of narrow-body engines. I commented earlier that Airbus have reportedly got 60 aircraft awaiting engines now. And therefore, the production of both the LEAP range of engines by CFM and the GTF by Pratt & Whitney are going to be vital to being able to deliver those aircraft and also to build consistently in the second half. And so those production rates have to significantly increase. And my assumption is that they will because at the moment, what we can see on the HPT side, we're intimate particularly in the first few blades of those turbines, there's a relatively good position way of overall inventory to produce. And the strike that happened in the first quarter in Safran is now over, and therefore, that's helping them. And we're supplying now back into volume on the LPT side. So I'm thinking that volumes are going to go up. But the question is with the volume ramps of everybody, then is that supply going to be sufficient for everybody, including spare engines, et cetera, et cetera. So that's the one area which I'm sort of trying to look at more closely because it's closer to home. And elsewhere, it's difficult for me to really see. I mean I can't monitor laboratories or seats or AB system. It's just too difficult.

And maybe if I could have a follow-up there on fasteners. Precision Castparts had their facility accident in the first quarter. Are you seeing the orders materialize from customers to make sure that they can meet all of those products? I mean it is the largest or it was the largest fastener facility for aerospace in the world. And the gains that you're getting, how does that compare to what you initially thought?

So I think PCC is trying really hard to maintain as much production as possible with movements to a plant in California. They've also been moving a lot of equipment that was still functioning or able to be functional from Jenkintown to a local facility. So I believe something in the of several hundred pieces of equipment have been moved. But at the same time, the complete picture cannot be serviced by just them alone. In the last call, I commented that we moved to about $25 million of orders for that, and we're still bidding out several hundred part numbers. The picture today is that we've moved much closer to $40 million. And therefore, that's good. We are still bidding out a lot of part numbers. So we're sort of gradually moving towards what we said as an internal target for us for that business and a healthy increase in revenue for the company as we begin to supply those, not massively today, but increasingly over the next 12 months.

This concludes our question-and-answer session. The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.