Good morning, and welcome to the Howmet Aerospace Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2025 Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Please note, this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Paul Luther, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Gary. Good morning, and welcome to the Howmet Aerospace Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2025 Results Conference Call. I'm joined by John Plant, Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; and Patrick Winterlich, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. After comments by John and Patrick, we will have a question-and-answer session. I would like to remind you that today's discussion will contain forward-looking statements relating to future events and expectations. You can find factors that could cause the company's actual results to differ materially from these projections listed in today's presentation and earnings press release and in our most recent SEC filings. In today's presentation, references to EBITDA, operating income and EPS, mean adjusted EBITDA, excluding special items, adjusted operating income, excluding special items and adjusted EPS, excluding special items. These measures are among the non-GAAP financial measures that we've included in our discussion. Reconciliations to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures can be found in today's press release and in the appendix in today's presentation. In addition, unless otherwise stated, all comparisons are on a year-over-year basis. With that, I'd like to turn the call over to John.

Thank you, PT. Good morning, and welcome to Howmet's Q4 and Full Year 2025 Earnings Call. Let's start with the highlights on Slide #4. Q4 was an extremely solid quarter. Revenue of $2.17 billion was up 15%. Full year revenue was up 11%, and hence, the final quarter saw an acceleration of growth. EBITDA was $653 million, up 29%. Our operating income was $580 million, an increase of 34%. Full year EBITDA of $2.42 billion was an increase of 26%. Free cash flow after record capital spend of $453 million was $1.43 billion, which is more than $100 million above the guidance and a 93% conversion of net income. . Over the last 6 years, aggregate net income conversion to free cash flow has been 95%. Earnings per share were $1.05, an increase of 42% in the quarter over 2024, resulting in a 40% increase for the year. Capital deployment in the quarter included $200 million of share buybacks, $50 million of dividends, $55 million for preferred share redemption and a further $125 million for debt reduction. The closing cash balance was $743 million, allowing for further share buybacks in January and February with $150 million completed quarter-to-date. I'll stop at this point and let Patrick provide commentary by end markets and by segment.

Thank you, John. Good morning, everyone. Please move to Slide 5. Another solid quarter for Howmet's with end markets continuing to be healthy. We are well positioned for the future and continue to invest for growth. Revenue was up 15% in the fourth quarter and up 11% for the full year. Commercial aerospace growth remained strong throughout 2025, with revenue up 13% in the fourth quarter and up 12% for the full year. Commercial aerospace growth is driven by accelerating demand for engine spares and a record backlog for new, more fuel-efficient aircraft with reduced carbon emissions. Commercial aerospace engine spares were up 44% for the full year, driven by both legacy and next-generation engines. Defense aerospace growth continued to be robust at 20% in the fourth quarter. For the full year, Defense aerospace was up 21%, driven by engine spares, which increased 32% as well as new F-35 aircraft builds. Commercial transportation revenue was up 4% in the fourth quarter. However, it was down 5% for the full year, including the pass-through of higher aluminum costs and tariffs. On a volume basis, wheels was down 10% in the fourth quarter and down 13% for the full year. We continue to outperform the market with Howmet's premium products. As mentioned on the Q3 earnings call, we have combined the oil and gas and IGT markets into a single market we are calling gas turbines. The definition of oil and gas versus mid- to small IGT has become blurred since many turbines now have an increasing end use for data centers. We have provided historical gas turbine revenue in the appendix on Page 19. Gas turbine growth has been very strong with revenue up 32% in the fourth quarter and up 25% for the full year. Gas turbine growth is driven…

Thank you, Patrick, and let's move to Slide 11. Let me turn to the outlook for the company and I'll provide summary comments before providing more detail for each market segment. The vast majority of the markets we serve, including commercial aerospace, defense, and land-based gas turbines are in a growth phase. The commercial truck wheel segment is stable at a low level and should begin to show signs of growth towards the latter half of 2026. Firstly, commercial aerospace is buoyed by increased air travel, both domestic and international. The highest growth is seen in Asia Pacific, notably China, but also in North America and in Europe. Freight traffic also continues to grow. Passenger demand combined with the recent multiyear underbuild of commercial aircraft have together led to a record OEM backlog stretching into the next decade. New aircraft builds, including narrow-body, wide-body and freighters are planned to grow at all aircraft manufacturers. I'll provide expected build rates later in the call. . In addition to these robust newbuilds, spares continue to be elevated by the expanding size and growing age of the current fleet of aircraft. This is further enhanced by durability issues found in some modern engines essentially due to higher operating pressures and temperatures, which are required to achieve increased fuel efficiency. Air pollution in certain parts of the world further contribute to the problem. Defense markets, especially fixed wing aircraft are also buoyant. The largest platform, the F-35 continues to be steady for OE builds, again, with a very large new build backlog while spares also continued to grow due to the size of the fleet. In fact, for our Engine Products segment in 2025, the F-35 spares demand exceeded the OE demand for the aggregate value of spare parts provided. The F-15 and F-16…

[Operator Instructions] The first question is from Doug Harned with Bernstein.

John, I'd like to understand sort of how your thinking has evolved when you look ahead over the next 5 years with engine products. Clearly, things have changed. And can you contrast your expectations for the relative growth across commercial, aero, defense, gas turbines as you think about planning, investments and so forth. And then related to this, you just reached a record EBITDA margin of 34%. In [ branding ] products. Are you near a ceiling with this? And what's enabling you to get to these higher margins?

Okay. So as you say by thinking has evolved. I guess, thinking always evolves with the passage of time and the circumstances change. I mean, I think the constant throughout this start off with commercial aerospace, where I've been convinced that growth will be robust and continuing. As you know, sometimes over the last 2 or 3 years or maybe 4 years, it hasn't been quite as good as we had envisaged, and that's principally due to the difficulties in final assembly of aircraft and also engines. But the trajectory has been positive and the future continues to look really good. And so when I consider the backlog the commercial aircraft that are there. I think it is quite extraordinary. And I think the word extraordinary is appropriate. And that applies to both narrow-body aircraft and wide-body aircraft. Since if you were to order a new aircraft today, you're really looking at delivery beyond 2030. If build rates were not to increase that it would be possibly almost towards the end of the 2030 decade. And so there's a very strong requirement for builds to increase. And so I think that backlog number gives great comfort in the investments that we've made. And you've seen our capital expenditure developed very notably over the last few years. And we've talked previously about building out another complete manufacturing plant and extending say, 1.5 manufacturing plants in it for our commercial aerospace business. So that's been very significant, and that's on top of the new engine plant that we built in 2020 coming on stream at that time, we started COVID there's been a tremendous investment for the commercial aerospace market. At the same time, we've seen very solid demand for defense and I think the surprise there has not been the solidity…

Well, and just on margins, the 34%, which was unusually high.

Well, I think it's a good margin. As you know, I never I'm willing to consider what margins are for the future because I find it always a very difficult topic to cover. As you know, we don't seek to take them down at the same time, predicting increases is not something that I've ever been willing to do and because so many factors come into play regarding that. I mean, at the moment, I see, for example, I have to take on additional cost, not only of the new manufacturing plants, but also I think that we're going to sort of recruit another net 1,500 people plus in 2026 into our Engine segment. And so on all of those people would require training and et cetera, et cetera. So there's a lot going on and I'm also very clear that if we were to hit all that marks then again, the output that we need to achieve won't come from just the new capital load, we've got to try to attain further yield improvements, which then requires us to have effective labor and also bringing together all of the -- I'll say, the flow that we have and trying to get more repeatable product through our manufacturing facilities. And I think the opportunity, which I see in the midterm is that we will be able to move for more batch production in the gas turbine area, it's more of a flow style production which, again, towards the end of the decade, should begin to, say, further give us impetus on yields and therefore, margin. But it's way too early to predict that, Doug.

the next question is from Seth Seifman with JPMorgan.

This is Alex on for Seth today. Maybe one kind of more specific to the guide for this year. Based on the guide for Q1, the midpoint of the rest of the guide for 2026 kind of implies minimal improvement in revenue, adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EPS. Now wondering if you could kind of walk us through the puts and takes there and why that is? And also on the margin, the full year guide kind of implies that the margin is going to decline 30 bps for the full year from the 30.6% in Q1. Wondering how much of that might be related to maybe some start-up friction related to the engine capacity additions you're expecting to come online this year? Or if there's maybe some other things we should account for there?

Let's say, the most important thing to note is that we do have an extraordinary amount going on in the company. We are deploying capital for new equipment at an extraordinary rate. We're building -- we're extending 5 new manufacturing plants. And one thing I haven't commented on is that we actually purchased another manufacturing plant. So let's call it a brownfield in February of this year essentially aimed at the gas turbine market because we've literally run out of square footage. And so I mean, all the capacitization that we've been considering. And then as you have heard, we're taking on 2 acquisitions, 1 of which we've closed, 1 of which we expect to close during the year. So between building out of capital equipment, building out of new sites, recruitment of labor and also the acquisitions we've talked about. That's an enormous amount going on and it's always a struggle to believe you'll be successful on every single one of them and et cetera, et cetera. So I mean, for me, 30 basis points of margin is not really significant. I'd look at the incrementals, and I'll say it's like, I think, 43% in Q1 and maybe, I think, 41% for the year. So again, pretty close. And we've got to make sure that all of those new manufacturing facilities come on stream, build products while taking on labor. And there's always the possibility of us not hitting everything in quite the way we do it, and therefore, I think the caution is always the best way. And we take, as you've heard we say in the past I guide seriously. So I think predicting 30.3% EBITDA margins for the year is pretty good at this point. And if we manage everything really well, and maybe it will be better. But at this point, I think we've given you the best shot of what we think is a balanced view of everything that's going on.

The next question is from Robert Stallard with Vertical Research.

John, I just wanted to follow up on your comments on the ITT investment. Do you think the ROIC on all this spending is going to be similar to what you've achieved in commercial and aerospace in the past?

I think, first of all, if you go back and review what I've said publicly is that there essentially is no difference between the margin that we have on gas turbines and put in our commercial aerospace or defense space. And so it's all the order of magnitude. If you look at the embedded return on capital, again, at a very similar nature. Of course, the more, I'll say, brand-new virgin capital, you deploy [ Catacas ] a bit of a drag on those returns. And at the moment, it's difficult to plan out all of the blends that might be going on since we haven't bottomed yet what the final capital deployment will be in the gas turbine sector. As I said, we've completed 3 out of 4 of the major large gas turbine customers or across the whole of the gas turbine segment 4 out of 7. So there's still a lot to consider. And each one of our customers are also looking themselves whether they can achieve an output increase across all of the, I'll say, their own builds plus other, I'll say, component suppliers. So all of those discussions are continuing and therefore, the final capital build and exactly the timing of it will, it's going to be deployed, it's difficult to know. But the direction of what I've tried to indicate, we know it's like we spent maybe 300 -- I can't remember the number there, $350 million plus or minus or $340 million in '24, $450 million in '25, we're saying 470 midpoints with a plus or minus 20%. But if you ask me to give a gut feel, obviously, more like a plus at the side at this point? And '27, again, it's not fully baked by any means, but I envisage at the moment to be at least the amount that we have in 2026 or possibly higher as we complete all of these things. And then just trying to say, bring it all to earth as we plan all these things out. And again, make sure that we can afford as you envelope of cash generation we've talked about. So just specifically being on ROIC, it's also of a similar order of magnitude today but the blends of what's new capital versus the existing base, that can change as we move through the next 2 or 3 years.

The next question is from John Godyn with Citi.

Cash generation has been strong, financial leverage at record lows, like you mentioned. I just wanted to talk about capital deployment a bit. How you're thinking about M&A versus buybacks. And with M&A, we saw the consolidated aerospace manufacturing deal, which was a bit larger. I'm just kind of curious how you're thinking about the landscape for larger M&A and growth opportunities that could unlock.

First of all, we've been -- could you bold on providing returns to our shareholders essentially passing back all of the cash flow that we have achieved whether it's been share repurchase, dividend, I see debt reduction in the same category, while ensuring that we have always invested enough to be able to basically drive the organic growth of the company forward. And you've seen consistently growth in the double-digit area for several years and also indicating another double-digit growth for this year. And if we're successful on all of the capital expenditure this year than I envisioned '27 were also going to be healthy. So I mean, so first priority, John is always the deployment of capital to enable the growth opportunities that we have, say, come to fruition. Then clearly, measure the, I'll say, share buyback and also while taking into account the opportunity for M&A and where the leverage of the balance sheet is. And so if you think about CAM, $1.8 billion is significant. But at the same time, where we think about the leverage is we're below our long-run target average, let's call it, 1.5% or less than that. And so CAM doesn't really stretch us, and we envisage being able to continue to buy back shares as well. So it's not a -- currently, it's not a choice 1 or the other. We're able to -- I'll say, at this point, do it all. We're investing in the business at record levels, so $450 million, trending to $500 million. We're deploying share buyback in a significant way and probably going to end up with a larger buyback in 2026 that we had in 2025. We are deploying capital into CAM of about $1.8 billion. And if I give you dimensions for the [ Butner ] acquisition, it's in that $120 million to $150 million range of capital let's say, about $60 million of revenue. So at the moment, if you think about it and also be kicking up dividend as well, even though the dividend yield is not the highest because we're growing so rapidly. I mean we are managing at this point to do it all. So I don't see why we have to fundamentally say we're going to do one or the other. And so we shall keep doing whether other M&A opportunities come up, but again, be very disciplined. And you've seen in the 2 we've done very much down in the middle of the fairway. It's in segments that we know well, segments that have earned the right to grow, segments that are producing very healthy absolute margins. And so an increased CapEx for fasteners, absolutely. Willingness to deploy for an acquisition, absolutely. And it's not stopping us also buying back shares as an elevated rate above the previous years.

The next question is from Scott Deuschle with Deutsche Bank.

John, given the demand for gas turbines and the unique value that Howmet creates in that market, do you see a future scenario where your gas turbine revenue at interim products could ultimately be larger than the commercial jet engine revenue?

That takes me too far out there. I don't think so because I think our commercial aerospace and our defense aerospace business is also growing rapidly, has grown. And I don't see that at this point in time. So I guess the short answer would be no. I think the most notable thing though, that it's going on, it's not just for us, the growth in absolute volume and I think I've talked about it in the past, but maybe not sufficiently. There's also a product mix change going on at the same time, whereby some of the technologists that was previously deployed in aerospace are also now being deployed in the gas turbine business probably even more so in the small to mid-range gas turbines, but also now in the large gas turbine area, when that is providing air flow passages through the turbine blades and therefore, requiring us to call the core tools to be able to provide those air passage ways. And that, again, produces for us a content increase. So we're looking at the -- both the absolute requirement to build more tunnels plus also the evolving landscape over the next few years, I'll say, more complex type of turbine blades, which again plays to our strength and capabilities. So it's all good, but I'm not yet ready for the premise that it could exceed. I mean, I don't know where we're going to be, say in 2030 or beyond its -- there's a lot of things going to happen yet to get this current obviously, requirements built out. But you do see the need for electricity increasing at a rapid pace, really for not just the next 3 years but well beyond maybe for the next decade and beyond.

The next question is from Sheila Kahyaoglu with Jefferies.

And John, it does seem like you are doing it all. You are in the process of closing CAM and you just did the [ Bruner ] acquisition, marks more M&A than you've done in the past. Maybe if you could just give us greater depth in terms of the market that opens up, the product offering and how you're thinking about maybe the returns as you think about either building or buying in terms of these investments?

Yes. I think the -- so I start with the CAM acquisition. For us, it takes us into the fittings and couplings area of, I'd say, the wider fastener market and that helps us to build out those segments in a more significant way and bring another very powerful force to market with the, I'll say, the backing and the ability to deploy capital behind it. And so that's particularly exciting for us and also, I think it's also exciting for our customers because I think they need and they see the opportunity for Howmet to provide further support in those segments of the market. . I mean at fasteners, of course, it's good, it's interesting, and we appreciate all of it. But I think the main thrust would be in those other adjacent segments that we can build out. So that would give you a bit of a theme on CAM. In terms of Bruno, what we saw so far, if I take just bolts as an example, we've been in the market producing I'll say, the smaller range of bolts, which a threaded bolts in particular, plus obviously nuts, but I'm really concentrated in this discussion on bolts. But we've never really had the ability or the size of capital to manage long lengths of bolts nor diameters in excess of an inch diameter. And so [ Bruner ] offers us a ready-made solution for that. And when we think about the markets that we don't serve, both in aerospace and in parts of industrial, where if we had got that product offering, then we would be more significant in the market and therefore, again, help our growth rate. And that's what [ Bruner] brings to us. And so if we were to try to build out that capability ourselves, particularly in the commercial aerospace segment, by the time you've engineered it or how you've deployed the capital you've got the certifications whereas now we have already made profitable in the base business which we can now seek certification of into certain aerospace applications and also to the wider market. So again, it's where I think the application of the heft of how [ met ] and our commercial position and the ability to deploy capital and make further investments is really going to see a benefit for us and for our customers where we're bringing a powerful new product capability to the market. And so that's the essence of the [ Brewer ] acquisition.

The next question is Myles Walton with Wolfe Research.

You have [ Louis Fed ] on for Myles.

Good morning.

John, I was hoping you could provide some additional color on how spares performed in the fourth quarter and the full year 2025 between commercial and then defense, I guess IGT. And what are your thoughts for 2026?

Yes. So in aggregate, our spares business grew over 30%, probably getting close to 33% for the year. And so again, a very healthy growth rate for us. Against the mark, where I think I said that we saw spares moving towards 20% over '25 and '26 in terms of the total revenue of Howmet. In actual fact, we exceeded that. We were at 21% for the 2025 year. So again, the overall growth rate helped us get to that level and hopefully, that we don't stop at 21%. Inside that 21% is that it's about 40% of our engines business. And to give you one other bit of color inside our overall, let's say, 32%, 33% growth last year. Commercial aero was early 40%. And so healthy growth. And we see that growth continuing into 2026. I haven't called out a specific number yet. But having achieved the 21%, then hopefully, we don't regress from that. And hopefully, it continues to be a larger portion of the Howmet overall revenue picture.

The next question is from Peter Arment with Baird.

Patrick. John, regarding like engine margins in general, like automation has been a big part of kind of a beneficiary for you. Can you maybe give us a little more color on like kind of where you are in the automation journey and for engines and are there other opportunities in the business that you seek for automation?

We spent quite a bit of money over, I'd say, '23, '24 in automation. And that's obviously been very beneficial for us and has help us or need for additional employees, there you can see we've been hiring at a significant rate. We've made sure that all of the new capital we deployed as a high level of automation. So when we showcase our new manufacturing plant in Whitehall next month, you'll see something that I talked about in one of the previous calls about digital thread and to track manufacturing to an extraordinary degree and also allow us to bring I'll say, machine learning and AI to a degree across that plant. And so I'm very hopeful. But I also know that first, for capital has been so high, and it's not just can we deploy the cash, but it's also where we can. It's also the engineering bandwidth, which has been totally absorbed by I'll say, the new markets that we've been developing for and customer requirements. And so it's taken a bit of a back seat in '25 and '26 and so the moment our choice has been will match the market and achieve that. And that's far more important for us to just to say, maintain and grow our market share and meet customer demand, and we have the opportunity in maybe it's '27 or probably more like '28, '29 to go back and also make some of the processes that we did not do while we're doing all of this, even though all the new stuff we're doing is highly automated.

This concludes the question-and-answer session, and the conference has also now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.