Thank you for standing by. This is the conference operator. Welcome to the IAMGOLD Second Quarter 2020 Operating and Financial Results Conference Call and Webcast. As a reminder, all participants are in listen-only mode and the conference is being recorded. [Operator Instructions] At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Indi Gopinathan, Vice President Investor Relations and Corporate Communications for IAMGOLD. Please go ahead.

Thank you very much, Claudia. And welcome everyone to the IAMGOLD second quarter conference call for 2020. Joining me today on the call are Gord Stothart, President and Chief Executive Officer; Carol Banducci, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; Bruno Lemelin, Senior Vice President, Operations and Projects; Craig MacDougall, Senior Vice President, Exploration; and Jeffery Snow, Senior Vice President, Business Development and General Counsel. Our remarks on this call will include forward looking statements. Please refer to the cautionary language regarding forward-looking information in our disclosure documents and be advised that the same cautionary language applies to our remarks during the call. With respect to the technical information to be discussed, please refer to the technical information and qualified persons slide. The slides referenced on this call can be viewed on our website. I will now turn the call over to our President and CEO, Gord Stothart.

Well, thank you, Indi and good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us. So last night, we issued solid operating results for the second quarter of 2020 demonstrating strong operating cash flows on increased margins, and further improvement to our already strong balance sheet. Subsequent to quarter, we announced our decision to go forward with the construction of Côté, a transformational growth project. And like all of you, we've been adapting to our new normal with COVID-19 changing the way we work and for some where we work. We will provide an update on our activities with respect to COVID-19 in a minute. Finally, we are providing updated guidance for the year taking into account the suspension of operations at Rosebel, and the resumption of capital sustaining expenditures. Before I move on to the next slide, I wanted to note here that last night we also announced the retirement of two key members of our executive leadership team. After 13 years with the company, Carol Banducci has advised us of her intention to retire from IAMGOLD on March 31, 2021 Carol has steadfastly seen the company through a bull market, a bear market, and several transitions. Her disciplined approach to financial management is the reason we have the balance sheet we have today. And her success in building an outstanding finance and accounting team has positioned the company exceptionally well today for both challenges and opportunities. I certainly wish her all the best in retirement and look forward to our continued work together over the next several months. In addition, Jeff Snow will be retiring from the company effective August 31, 2020. Jeff has had a storied 39-year career at the intersection of law and mining, and we will miss his wise counsel and wish him all the best…

Thanks, Gord. Listen, I’m going to go off script a little bit here and I just want to thank Gord for those kind words he said earlier. I think it's very much a personal decision to retire. And I'm confident that under Gord’s strong leadership that we have a strong path to transforming this company. We have a great company, we have great people, and we have a great future. So, with that, again, good morning, everybody and turning to the second quarter, the company continues the trend of strong gold margins in the second quarter with strong operating cash flows. The quarter also presented opportunities to execute favorable input cost hedges on both currency and fuel exposures for Côté. With the development of Côté, IAMGOLD will become a growing diversified Canadian company generating superior returns, while prudently managing risk. To achieve this transformational strategy, and in order to mitigate gold price exposure and revenue risks over the construction periods, the company intends under appropriate conditions to hedge 15% to 20% of its total gold production between 2021 and mid-2023 through a combination of options and our callers. Following our construction decision announcement on Côté, credit agencies, S&P and Moody's reaffirmed IAMGOLD’s stable outlook. We continue to prudently manage our balance sheet with cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments and restricted cash of $866 million at the end of the quarter and our virtually undrawn credit facility of $500 million. As Gord mentioned, COVID-19 did impact us in different ways in the quarter. Working capital was higher due to our intentional increase in supplies inventory, as well as the buildup of finished goods due to timing of shipments and the higher cost of inventory. Expect depreciation expense in 2020 to be in the range of $245 million to $255 million, down $5 million from the previous guidance. Our cash taxes guidance remains unchanged at $30 million to $45 million. Revenues in the second quarter were $284.6 million due to strong gold prices, while cost of sales were lower compared to the same prior year period in the prior quarter. The adjusted net earnings for the quarter was $20.1 million or $0.04 per share. Net cash from operating activities before changes in working capital totaled $79 million, following the strength in gold prices, our prudent management of the balance sheet or liquidity excluding restricted cash and including $500 million credit facility totals over $1.3 billion. Our $400 million in senior notes are not due until 2025. Next slide highlights the strength of our financial position relative to our peer group of gold producers. And as you can see, we continue to be in a net cash position with peer leading liquidity. I will now pass the call over to Bruno to discuss operations.

Thank you, Carol. On Slide 17, we are committed to the health and safety of our employees and especially so during this time of the global COVID-19 crisis. In the second quarter of 2020, we achieved not only better than target on the DART rate, which stands for days a week restricted or transfer duties of [0.11]. We work every day to meet or exceed our safety goals, implementing and refreshing a number of initiatives to ensure a safer work environment, including a comprehensive behavior-based safety program. This slide summarizes our results for the quarter with total consolidated attributable production of 155,000 ounces. Cost of sales of $1,030 per ounce sold; total cash costs of $935, an ounce produced; and all-in sustaining costs were $1,189 per ounce sold for the second quarter, I will now review each operation in turn. At Essakane, attributable gold production for the second quarter was 83,000 ounces. We mined higher grade zones in the quarter, but also completed less capitalized waste stripping. All-in sustaining costs were $1,123 for the quarter. By the lifting of the local administrative quarantine during the quarter, we experienced improved productivity. We were able to proceed with a crew change. The prior shift was particularly long, as some employees were on-site for almost two months. For the balance of 2020, we are expecting some graphitic ore which typically negatively impacts recoveries. We anticipate as well the mill optimization project to be delivered late this year or early next. In addition, on the exploration front drilling at Tassiri is completed, and we are compiling these results to assess resource potential. We continue to be vigilant with respect to COVID-19 with enhanced protocols in place to protect our workforce from the coronavirus. In these pictures, we highlight some of the sanitation measures implemented…

Thanks, Bruno and good morning, everyone. Before I begin, please note that the results I talk about today have been previously disclosed in accordance with securities regulations and signed off by the qualified persons within the company reporting them. In 2020, our planned exploration spend was $52 million excluding project development activities and studies, and will involve the completion of approximately 190,000 to 210,000 meters of diamond and reverse circulation drilling to support resource development programs and exploration target evaluation. Although we are maintaining our outlook on our exploration program, we continue to reassess the impacts of the COVID-19 crisis going forward, and we'll adjust accordingly. As we have said before, [industry moved] reserves have been on a steady decline since 2012. IAMGOLD has been working hard to differentiate ourselves from this industry trend. Beyond just replacing reserve balances depleted from mine production, we have also achieved a significant increase in reserves over that time. In 2016, we have not only replaced every ounce mine, but also added over 8 million ounces more than doubling our reserve base. This is the result of a sustained commitment to exploration through the cycle, and the tireless efforts of our exploration and mine geology teams. We believe this is a significant competitive advantage for IAMGOLD and for our future. During the quarter, we announced further infill diamond drilling results from the Rouyn Gold Project as we work to delineate maiden resorts at the Lac Gamble zone, which we feel may have potential to provide satellite feed tour Westwood operation. Highlights include 9.8 meters, grading 27.8 grams per ton gold, which included 4.4 meters grading 58.4 grams per ton gold, and another hole with 9.8 meters grading 10.4 grams per ton gold, which included a three meter interval grading 22.8 grams per ton gold.…

Thanks very much Craig. So, from a strategic perspective, Q2 2020 was really a milestone quarter for the company with the announcement of Côté moving forward. We remain focused on lowering our consolidated cost profile to improve margins and cash flow, increasing our gold production, increasing our operational flexibility, enhancing the geographic diversity of our overall portfolio, and of course, improving returns to shareholders. To best achieve this, we believe we need to achieve self funding at each of our existing operations to ensure exploration activities, corporate functions and financing obligations in aggregate are not a burden on our balance sheet, sequence development of our organic growth pipeline starting with a construction of Côté and continued de-risking Boto. We will also be planning for an exciting future with the advanced of our rich district brownfield and greenfield operation exploration prospects which include Gosselin, Karita and Diakha-Siribaya along with Boto in the Bambouk district in West Africa, Nelligan, Monster Lake in Northeastern Quebec, along the Saramacca Brokolonko trend in Suriname, and our Westwood Hub-and-Spoke model in the Abitibi. Importantly, this all needs to be accomplished while continuing to be leaders in ESG performance through relentless pursuit of our zero harm vision. We continue to guide our efforts in accordance with our vision to be the global leader in creating superior value for our stakeholders through accountable mining, supported by our experienced team of technical, operational and financial professionals. Thank you for joining us today and I will now pass the call over to the operator.

Thank you. We will now begin the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Our first question is from Fahad Tariq with Credit Suisse. Please go ahead.

Hi, good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. Maybe first on Saramacca, can you remind us what construction is left for this year and whether the lower growth CapEx guidance for this year, does that mean there's some spill over of CapEx into 2021? Maybe if you can just give some context on what's left to do at Saramacca and what the CapEx could look like for next year? Thanks.

Bruno, can you address that please?

Yes, certainly. Hello, Fahad. So, the infrastructure that remains to be built is water tank, maintenance shop, and some offices and the rest is just finalizing the paving of the road with the final framework and that's it. So, we don't expect to have much capital to be extended to 2021 as we speak right now.

Okay, great. That's helpful. And just one other question on Westwood, I know you reaffirm the longer-term guidance, but the reserves decline, how should we be thinking about the mine life now at Westwood?

So, we still expect mine life beyond 2030, and as we guided on December 2019, we’re doing a [slower impact] from 100,000 ounces to 125,000 and then to try to get to a run rate 130,000 to 145,000 gold ounces. And we're pretty confident the target is to try to convert back resources and to resolve by adding [rating] at Westwood in the north corridor and [indiscernible] over the next few years. And so, we can upgrade and produce resources to indicated measures and then finalizing the mining plan so they can be put into reserve. And also, we have adjusted our reserve according to a grant condition by adding geotechnical risk adjustment factor and also in changing the dilution and recovery factors associated to our new [indiscernible]. However, we're going to continue to work around these sectors to improve our extraction strategy. So we can put some of those answers back into the reserves. So, when you look at it, all-in-all, with the resource base that we have and the conversion factor that we've had in the past, also looking also at the reconciliation history that we had from reserves to the mill, we are quite confident about our guidance that I just described and to go beyond 2030.

That's helpful. Thank you.

Our next question is from Josh Wilson with RBC Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

Thanks. First question on Westwood, just trying to understand what mining cost assumptions we should be incorporating longer-term? I did notice that the technical report had a mining cost for the mine plan of around CAD224, but the cut-off for reserves was about $50 lower in the 170 range?

Bruno, can you speak to that?

Yes. So, for the – we made – I'm just trying to find the difference between, just give me one second.

Sure.

I can then give you back the answer you [indiscernible] calculation and then maybe what I'll do is, I'll come back with you with extra mining costs and because we have to transform [project] in Westwood and also we have to cut-off grade mining cost, so I want to make sure that the difference between the two, so I’ll come back with you when I [have it. Okay].

Okay. And on the capital side, so the CapEx is $200 million-ish is for the current reserve base. Should we be assuming a similar amount of capital for reserves that will be added? Or is there a lot more development that's required for the current reserve base that's been defined?

That's for [indiscernible]?

For Westwood.

Okay, sorry. Yes. So in fact, we’re going to continue to keep developing Westwood so associated to it, you have natural development [let’s call in other mining infrastructure] that needs to be associated to this when you want to model the additional answers for that.

Okay. And then, last question is related to Westwood, the shaft at one point that has been discussed historically, I don't believe that incorporated for the current reserves. Is that still part of the plan longer-term? Or is that new to access reserves that you would project out to that [2020, 2030] plus timeline?

Right now, we believe that the main access is sufficient as we speak, and, again, we – what we need to do, as we speak, is to further investigate the lower and the eastern side of the mine. And then, we'll be able to develop a mine plan in excess associated with.

Okay. And then…

Sorry, Josh. As we've looked at it, because of the depth of the deposit, the shaft is starting to become a long ways at the bottom end from the deposit, so we've evaluated putting a wins and we've looked at some declines and we're sort of going through that analysis now. You know, either one of those solutions still supports the declaration of resources. Obviously, as we get into reserves, we'll need to crystallize the current plan, the final plan, sorry.

Great. And then one final question. Sorry, I'm plugging on at your time here. For Saramacca, you know, at one point there was a discussion about coming out with an underground study, which would have been, I guess, most beneficial early in the mine life to reduce some of that upfront stripping. Is that currently the plan? Or should we expect the study on that, you know, upcoming?

Right now, we're still figuring out the best option whether to pursue with the open pits at the current price environmental versus the underground. We keep – we still have some investigation to do for the underground to further understand the true value of this option. So, right now as we speak, it's still conceptual and we're still assessing our options that we have at them whether to continue thinking with the open pit or converting it to the underground potential, but as we speak right now, it's too soon to tell.

Great. Those are all my questions. Thank you.

Our next question is from Jackie Przybylowski with BMO Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

Hi, thanks very much. I guess I'll start off, I noticed in the release last night; you didn't talk too much about the Sadiola sale. It was previously forecasted, I guess, to be completed around the end of April. So, I was wondering if you could give us an update on that. I'm guessing there's some delays due to COVID; do you have any idea when that might close?

So Jackie, yes, you're entirely correct. We have seen some delays due to COVID. Most of everything has been inked up. There is a little bit of political machinations going on in Mali right now, not with respect to Sadiola, but more just with respect to the overall politics in Mali and figuring out the path forward for the government. Everything is signed up and ready to go. We're just – really just waiting for a new cabinet to be formed and a new Mines Minister and Finance Minister to be put in place. We anticipate that that may add a little bit of additional time as the new ministers familiarize themselves with the file, but from a bureaucratic point of view and certainly from a business point of view, between ourselves and AngloGold Ashanti and Allied, everything is ready to go, so we're just waiting on finalization right now.

Got it. And maybe if I could just ask a different question on Rosebel, you lowered the guidance and a lot of that looks like it's due to Rosebel. I understand that there is a strike and that you've got productivity hits from the social distancing. Can you quantify how much of the guidance revision, so 40,000 ounce guidance revision, how much of that is due to the strike and how much of that is due to the going forward productivity hitch? And I guess the question being like, would you expect some productivity hits similarly to affect 2021 as well?

I mean, I'll let Bruno answer. I've been – from my perspective about 80% to 90% of it is due to the suspension. There are some productivity hits in the near term, although we are seeing better grades for the remainder of the year, so we are able to compensate some of that. But it's almost a direct one-to-one the changing guidance with respect to Rosebel being the suspension period. You know that's the amount of production we would have had out of Rosebel. As we look to 2021, we're not anticipating any further productivity impacts. We have a plan in place to get back to our full complement of manpower through some additional camp construction. And once we're at full manpower, we'll see full productivity. I don't know if you'd want to add anything else, Bruno?

That's correct, Gord. About 90% of the answers are coming from the suspension of the operation and the rest is just the ramp up to our original run rate.

Got it. That's it for me. Thanks very much.

Thanks, Jackie.

Our next question is from Michael Parkin with National Bank. Please go ahead.

Thanks, guys. Most of my questions were answered, just one housekeeping one. The cash taxes guidance, what gold prices are based off of?

It’s 1,500 Mike.

Okay. And just a little bit on Westwood, with the change here, is there any additional labor changes like I know, you've made some changes recently and we're seeing U.S. dollar operating costs come down. Just trying to get a sense of like, what we could expect going forward with the lower mining rates? Is that going to call for, you know, further reduction in manpower?

Bruno?

Yes. So, we don't expect any further decrease in the workforce. We did an adjustment a year ago to that. And however, for now, we believe we have the workforce to complete the life on mine that we have designed it, but a little bit more personnel needed for the underground operation, but right now as we speak, we believe that the workforce is going to be quite stable, if not just increase a little bit. To come back to the mine operating costs, for mining at Westwood, those are CAD224 per ton.

And then, will milling costs and [site G&A] costs be up?

Yes.

Just because of the lower throughput?

Yes. So CAD26.09 for milling and CAD42.95 for [indiscernible] G&A. So, it's all Canadian dollars.

Okay.

What we're seeing, Mike, is actually with the additional rock that we're putting through from Grand Duke and we anticipate to put through from sale and so forth, the administrative and milling costs actually are lower for the complex as we move forward on a per ton basis, it's assigned to Westwood.

Are you guys doing owner operated for the open pits or are those contracts?

Contracts.

And in fact getting reported through OpEx or is that…

Yes.

Yes, it's getting – it's coming through OpEx.

Okay. All right, that's it for me, guys. Thanks.

Thanks Mike.

Our next question is from Carey MacRury with Canaccord Genuity. Please go ahead.

Hi, good morning, everyone. Just had a question on 2021 CapEx the press release notes, around $250 million for 2021, which isn't too far off from the 2020 guidance once you strip out, you know, Côté and Boto. So, I'm just wondering, you know, if Saramacca spending, you know, expected to be down, and I know that personally affects that lower stripping into 2021. Just how should we think about capital, that number relative to this year's number?

Bruno, do you have a thought on that?

Can you repeat the question, please, sorry, just to make sure?

The question is around, what's our capital expectation for 2021 given the shifts that we've made for 2020.

Yes, I guess it’s…

[Indiscernible] 2021 versus 2020. But again, we would assume that fair market should be down a bit, and then it notes that capital stripping should be lower in 2020, so just trying to understand the 2021 numbers.

Yes, that assumption of our sustaining CapEx for the remainder of 2020 is taking place in Q3 and Q4 and some of the capital project in Q4 and some of the capitalized stripping also will take place in 2021. Right now, it’s a little bit early to see the full impact of the overall envelope. We don't believe that's going to be that material. We believe that we can keep having same production level with a reasonable [capital envelope so].

And maybe I can add that, I mean, again, the 2021 is under review just given, you know, what transpired with COVID this year, and we did redo some of our capitalized stripping this year, so we'll have to look at the new mine plans as Bruno has alluded to. And so, we'll have to look at updating that, you know, perhaps in Q3, but it is under review and just it's something that we're looking at.

And maybe just on the mill de-bottlenecking at Essakane, just what the status of that is and if that can also flow over into 2021?

So, I mean, the current schedule we have right now, Carey, is to complete by the end of the year. There is a possibility it gets pushed a little bit into Q1, mostly on delivery of some of the supplies, again, related to COVID. Our capital assumptions that we put in place assume that we run it out and it's up and running by the end of the year versus – I mean our original intention was to have it up and running in Q3, but that was one of the areas where we – when we went into reduced or COVID impacted activities that we did reduce the level of work on that project.

That's it from me. Thanks.

Thanks Carey.

Our next question is from Tanya Jakusconek from Scotiabank. Please go ahead.

Good morning, everyone. Can you hear me?

Yes.

Great. Thank you. First of all, just I want to say congrats to Carol and Jeff on their retirement. Well done. Maybe I have three questions and I wanted to talk about a couple of quite easy, maybe for you, Carol. Just on the incremental COVID-19 expenses, those are going to be included in other expenses going forward and excluded from your total cash costs and all-in sustaining costs.

Yeah. And again, we do a very detailed review of all the COVID costs, Tanya. So, anything that we think is going to continue will fit in cost of sales, but it's those costs that we think are one-time like for instance premiums that we've paid to employees when we're going through the transition and introducing all the protocols, or if we’ve brought in some additional housing in order to accommodate the employees and do the spacing distancing. So, anything that we've done on a one-time basis has gone through other expenses. So, anything to do with, you know, obviously, productivity levels, because of all the protocols we have put in place that we're not excluding that. So, that's the way that you should be looking at it. It's the one-time costs that we're putting through other expenses. And as you said, they'll be, they will not be included in cash costs or all-in sustaining costs.

Okay, and so Carol, what should we expect going forward on these costs for, let's say the rest of this year?

Right, I mean, I think we're hoping that the worst of it is over, and so, you know, we had obviously, Westwood in care and maintenance has ramped up really quite nicely, and the same with Essakane, we have very specific administrative sort of quarantines that went in place and country, and again, we're operating Essakane, it's been able to operate without any significant interruption. And we've had obviously – we've just come out of this, the suspended operation at Rosebel. So, we're hoping that the worst of it is behind us, and so we're not expecting the same level of cost going forward into the rest of the year. We are expecting some costs, but not to the degree that we experienced in Q2, but like, like, you know, like you – I don't think anybody really knows what might happen with COVID and whether we see another, you know, sort of outbreak. I think we've put all the measures in place, and we've been very, very diligent in all the things that we've done. And we've worked with the various health officials in country. So, like I said, we're hoping that the worst is over, and we won't see the same thing that we experienced in Q2.

Okay. And then maybe on capital allocation board, Carol, you just set current gold prices, obviously, you're going to be generating a lot more cash flow than you budgeted. You know, clearly the construction of Côté, you know, we'll get some, you know, the – quite a bit of that, but what are you thinking about in terms of allocation on any incremental cash flow that you generate due to the higher gold prices?

You know, for rate now, I'll let Carol chime in, but our expectations will continue to conservatively manage the balance sheet. You know, as we look strategically out with a Côté construction, we're very, very comfortable with the level of cash flow we have. And our internal models are using much, much lower gold prices to ensure that we get through while maintaining the required cash balances and our leverage ratios hit below the targets that we've set for ourselves.1 If we generate additional, obviously that helps us work through. We are considering obviously the development of Boto at a later date. So that is also being factored into our analysis where we go, and you know, obviously as prices continue to go up and cash continues to be generated, we'll look at, you know, a little bit of redistribution. Certainly at some point in the future, I'd love to be able to get back to paying some dividends back to shareholders, and help everybody sort of share in the higher gold price. You know, beyond that, we're happy with where we're at and we'd like to get sort of a year of Côté behind us and really understand that everything is truly solid for us. Carol would you add anything else?

Yeah, no, I’d just say, you know, as Gord said, like, we expect this company to generate superior returns and Côté is so transformational for us. You know, we've got a significant spin there and with the guidance we provided is $875 million to $925 million. And so our first priority is making sure that we bought sufficient capital to get this project built and running and once that occurs, we're expecting to be, you know, significantly generating, I mean, significantly generating cash flow. So, I think in the end-term, I think, you know, all of us can appreciate, everybody on the call, I'm sure can appreciate just a significant volatility around the gold price. And so, you know, continues to stay at these levels or continues to rise, definitely, it'll cause us to take a look at sort of what kind of optionality that we have, but, you know, it's three and a half years, and we just need to make sure that we protect the balance sheet in the interim, but our goal is absolutely to generate superior returns and provide returns to our shareholders.

And what's the minimum cash balance that you're going to keep on the balance sheet over the next couple of years?

200 million.

Okay. And my final question, just, you know, for Gord, Bruno, you know, just on the Westwood, I just thought we had moved out 550,000 ounces of reserves into resources, what do you need to see to bring those back into reserves?

Hello Tanya, this is Bruno. So, again like I explained it is – we were very conservative in our assumptions. We want to offer a safe, sustainable, and profitable mind. So, we need to increase our knowledge on those specific zones in terms of the extraction strategy. So, just at this moment, we prefer to risk adjust those folks. So, they are not accounted for in the plan as we speak. However, we are doing many activities to be able to put them back in. So, we need more geotech drilling, modeling on those zones, and also to look at the extraction of other stocks and to see the behavior of the ground to see the confidence that we have to extract the others after that. It's just on this specific zone, seismicity is not applied to all the zones at Westwood, it's only – it is distributed on [indiscernible], but the main central [corridor] it was impacted, we have a lot of work to do to further understand some attributes that we want to be comfortable with before we put those answers back in.

Okay, thank you.

Our last question is from Anita Soni with CIBC World Markets. Please go ahead.

Thank you. So, first off, congratulations, Jeffery and Carol on your impending retirement. And then a second question, Carol, could you just go over – I think you mentioned that you have a policy of hedging going forward, can you just mention those parameters again?

Sure. I mean, in terms of, so there’s couple of things, Anita. So in terms of the inputs, we've already hedged all the fuel exposure for Côté over the construction period. And so, we’ve hedged that with an upper limit of $50. So, we're protected at $50. And on the bottom side, it's, I think it's around 38.50. And then what we've done is, we're also looking to hedge the Canadian Dollar, so we've hedged about 65 million of it in 2023 at 1.36. And we'll continue to watch Canadian dollar. It's obviously much stronger relative to the U.S. dollar. So our intent is, we've got some internal thresholds that we're focused on, and so we'll continue to watch it. And then what we announced this quarter is that, you know, just given, you know, the Côté project and wanting to make sure that we can execute on this transformational project, and really minimize the revenue risk, what we said is, you know, under the right circumstances, we may hedge or we will – we actually intend to hedge gold production. We haven't done anything yet. I'm just watching the gold price and it's sitting at [20.60] right now. So, we would look at doing that and no more than -- and I should say, in the range of 15% to 20% over the next, like I said, three years. It's really focused on 2021, 2022 and half of 2023 and so, we will look at doing it through a combination of options and collars. And as we look at the collars, what we would want to do our strategy would be to ensure that we still provided a substantial amount of upside to our shareholders. And so, we're looking at the ranges right now, and then possibly find some options, which again, out of the money, but creating that floor price on the gold price just because, you know, we just feel that it would might be prudent to do that to protect the balance sheet. So, that's our thinking, Anita.

Okay, thank you. Second question, more for Gord, I guess is, so Saramacca, it's been a while since you’ve really delved in depth into that, you know, it’s kind of supposed to start about this time last year and I'm just trying to get a rough idea of, you know, what the overall parameters were for the Saramacca in terms of tonnage and grade and what we should have been setting our goal posts for because it's been a while since we talked about that?

Yes. I think probably Bruno is more familiar with the current plan. We do expect to get up to pretty much run rate by Q4 and run rate for Saramacca is in the neighborhood of about – I think its 2.5 million to 3 million tons annually coming into the plant, can you fill that in a little bit more for me Bruno?

Exactly. So, we expect to have close to in between 0.75 million to 1 million ton of ore per quarter and this year, it was about 2.5 million like Gord is alluding to. Again, the ramp up is going to depend on the situation at Rosebel, like I mentioned. We are a bit constrained by the number of employees that we can have on the camp. So, we have to add new facilities to increase the workforce on site, so some activities are going to be delayed. Again, we're going to prioritize the treatment of the stockpile Saramacca ore. So we should see a fair ramp up for the Saramacca mining into Q3 and Q4 and getting to a natural run rate of that sense around 0.75 million ton, sorry per quarter, so that's again for 2021, like Carol alluded, we’re going to reaffirm our guidance associated to the other years later.

Okay. And then, in terms of the ore, sorry, the stockpile level, like was that direct ore feed from Saramacca? Was that ore that you had stockpiled from Saramacca?

Yes, we stockpile ore from Saramacca and then get transferred and all to the [indiscernible] actually. Again, it's every month since January we've been adding on the stockpile and as we have just started the – restarted the operation, now we are taking part of that stockpile to be processed at the mill and then the mining will resume as well.

Okay. So what's the level that stockpile right now at Saramacca?

About [0.5 million ton].

In terms of tonnage, yeah.

Sorry, how much?

0.5 million ton.

0.5 million ton. Okay. And then, just in terms of the grade going forward at Rosebel, it was low because you're processing stockpiles or is that kind of – is that – you know once you get through COVID?

Yes, that’s correct.

Okay. So, we should resume sort of more closer to the reserve grades or what you've been doing previously, you know, once sort of physical distancing issues are resolved?

Exactly. And so that's the plan. Stockpile in Saramacca and then we're going to start mining [indiscernible] and then the other pits. So, the grade should be improving.

And then, the overall tonnage at Rosebel is that it can process going forward given that you've got, you know, say 2.5 million to 3 million from Saramacca, what would Rosebel copper be delivering there?

Probably around 3,000 ton per day. It’s a good number as we speak now.

Okay.

It depends on the hardness of the material that we're adding. So, again [indiscernible].

Okay, sounds good.

We’re talking sort of 12 million to 13 million tons annually, including Saramacca.

Okay, sounds good. Alright, thanks. And then last question, so switching gears to Côté, just as we start to focus on – I mean, you're going to [indiscernible] ahead and you're going to be, you know, sort of kind of break ground on this in Q4. I mean, is it – can you just talk about sort of the construction build-out like EPCM, like, are you guys managing the two, who's involved, what's going on? I mean, we've seen a few build-outs in the last few years, but, you know, that we've – given the size of the capital that’s going to be sent, I'd appreciate a few more details on how this is going to unfold.

So, in our relation in July, we sort of laid out the spend on an annual basis or at least the percentage spend of the total on an annual basis. We are using an EPCM contractor. We're using Wood. You know, formerly the guy is from AMEC who helped us prepare the feasibility study in a bit involved in the detail engineering that we've been doing as part of the de-risking exercise. So, right now, the model is EPCM. Given the fact that we've advanced a lot of the engineering to such a high level compared to most projects, we are currently evaluating the opportunity to maybe do some of the packages EPC and lock in the fixed price so that we can execute those projects with even lower risk. So, they are the main driver of the project per se. We do have a full owner’s team that is looking after all of the main activities. We will transition as well to an operational readiness team that's being built. We are eager to really start our owner mining towards the end of 2021 as the initial couple of benches and the overburden will be stripped by contractor, but once we get down to hard rock, we'll start with our own mining fleet towards the end of next year. And the roll-out is, as you said, sort of breaking ground in Q4. We are doing a few activities through the summer here, specifically, some – we're looking to do some [fish salvage] of a couple the lakes in the tailings dam area that would allow us to get into tailings dam construction early next year. And I’d sort of leave it like that. I mean, I can – we can certainly elaborate a little bit more one-on-one, if you like, Anita.

Oh! That’s okay, thank you.

This concludes time allocated for questions. I will now hand the call back over to Indi Gopinathan for closing remarks.

Thank you very much, Claudia. And thanks to everyone for joining us this morning and for your continued interest in IAMGOLD. We look forward to having you join us again for our third quarter 2020 conference call in early November. Goodbye.

This concludes today's conference call. You may disconnect your lines. Thank you for participating and have a pleasant day.