Hello, and thank you for joining us for i-80 Gold Corp. 2025 Fourth Quarter and Full Year Results Conference Call and Webcast. Today's company presenters include Richard Young, President and Chief Executive Officer of i-80 Gold Corp., Paul Chawrun, COO, and Ryan Snow, CFO. Before we continue, please note that today's comments may contain forward-looking statements, which involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially. I ask everyone to refer to slide two of the presentation, which is available on i80gold.com to view the cautionary notes regarding the forward-looking statements made on this call and the risk factors related to these statements. Following today's formal presentation, we will open the call to your questions. I will now hand the call over to Richard Young. Please go ahead. Well, thank you, Joanna.

And hello, and thank you for joining today. Starting with slide three. In 2025, we made significant progress advancing our development plan and recapitalizing the company's balance sheet towards our goal of creating a mid-tier gold producer. From an operating standpoint, we achieved our 2025 production guidance with consolidated gold output of just under 32,000 ounces. That would have been at the higher end of the range had we not had the buildup in inventory at the end of the quarter, and Ryan and Paul will talk about that in a few minutes. Our production does continue to ramp up as Granite Creek ramps up. In parallel we advanced drilling, technical studies, and permitting across our portfolio of projects during the year, keeping us on track towards delivering on key project milestones in our development plan. Drill results, particularly at Granite Creek, were highly encouraging and support our decision to expand the infill and resource expansion programs in 2026. From a development perspective, we began construction of Archimedes, the company's second underground mine. We also capped off the year with the completion of the engineering study for the refurbishment of the Lone Tree process plant, which remains the cornerstone asset in our hub-and-spoke strategy to process material from our three underground mines. The board has approved the notice to proceed to Hatch Engineering for the full $400,000,000 Lone Tree refurbishment. We also executed on a series of recapitalization initiatives and, subsequent to year-end, secured a financing package of up to $500,000,000. The recapitalization is transformational for us as it allows us to advance our development plan unencumbered by the balance sheet. Importantly, the capital that was raised was secured with top-tier financial partners, including Franco-Nevada, National Bank of Canada, and Macquarie, who all share our long-term vision for the company and follow extensive due diligence. Their participation is a testament to the quality of our projects, our team, and our execution plan. I will now turn the call over to Paul Chawrun for a detailed update on the development work. Paul? Thank you, and hello, everybody. Turning to slide four. Operations and development work progressed well over the quarter.

With mining at Granite Creek and advancement rates at Archimedes performing better than planned. We continue to increase our bench strength by hiring talented personnel in the key areas essential to execute on our growth plan, such as geology, mining and metallurgical engineering, as well as supply chain, community relations, and the Lone Tree project owners’ team. I am also pleased to report we achieved our safety performance targets, finishing the year with an improved TRIFR of 0.62, including an incident-free fourth quarter. At Granite Creek Underground, mining activities continued to ramp up due to reduced water-related impact to mine operations, adjustments to the mine sequencing, and the delineation of additional high-grade areas through short-term drilling that were not included in the original resource model. As a result, we mined more mineralized material for the fourth quarter and the full-year period year-over-year. In the fourth quarter, we mined just over 41,000 tonnes of high-grade mineralized material, including approximately 15,000 tonnes of high-grade oxide material at a grade of 11.19 grams per tonne gold, approximately 26,000 tonnes of high-grade sulfide material at just over 9 grams per tonne gold, plus an additional 19,000 tonnes of incremental low-grade oxide material at just over 3 grams per tonne gold. For the year, we mined approximately 142,000 tonnes of high-grade mineralized material, including just over 70,000 tonnes of oxide mineralized material at over 11 grams per tonne gold, close to 72,000 tonnes of sulfide material at 9.08 grams per tonne gold, plus an additional 73,500 tonnes of incremental low-grade material at just below 3 grams per tonne gold. Total gold production was 3,600 ounces and 23,000 ounces for the quarter and full-year period, respectively. And this refers to the gold available for sale at the third-party processing facility, which contributes to the total gold…

Slide 11 outlines the company's 2026 guidance. Overall, the 2026 guidance is largely in line with the preliminary economic assessments published in 2025 with the following exceptions. At Granite Creek, as previously disclosed, the impact of groundwater was not reflected in the PEA. Key aspects of the 2026 mine plan, when accounting for the water ingress impacts from 2025, are an increased development rate compared to the PEA to recover lost development time, higher growth capital due to the additional dewatering infrastructure, and higher recovery rates and increased processing costs associated with the toll milling agreement entered into after the PEA was completed. As a result, for 2026, when compared to the most recent Granite Creek PEA, approximately 20% more material is expected to be mined. Mining, G&A, development and sustaining costs are in line. And the infill and step-out drill programs have expanded due to the successful outcome of the 2025 program. At Archimedes, tonnes and grade mined and development costs are largely in line with the most recent Archimedes PEA. The exception is production and processing costs related to the new toll milling agreement entered into after the PEA was finalized. And the feasibility study-related costs have been brought forward to 2026 from 2028. The cost to bring forward the Archimedes infill drill program is approximately $10,000,000 higher so that an exploration drift can be constructed and cover the additional cost of drilling longer holes earlier than was planned from the upper levels. For Mineral Point, technical and permitting work was brought forward from 2028 to 2026, where an overall infill and step-out drilling, technical work, and early permitting activities are expected to total approximately $50,000,000, the costs of which are covered under the new Franco-Nevada royalty. Other permitting, technical work, and holding costs are largely in line with the PEAs. And with that, I will now turn over the call to Ryan Snow for the financial review.

Thank you, Paul. Turning to slide 12. Gold sales for the year increased to approximately 28,200 ounces, compared to 21,500 ounces in the prior-year period, reflecting the advancements made at Granite Creek as Paul outlined earlier, slightly offset by a lag in the timing of third-party processing. This lag resulted in over 6,500 ounces of sulfide mineralized material in inventory, which we expect to process in the first quarter. When reconciling tonnes mined, gold produced and gold sold, there are two factors to keep in mind. First, there is often a timing difference between mining and production when using a third-party processor, and our agreement allows for up to 120 days for delivered material to be processed. Second, our high-grade oxide material is subject to a 59% payability factor, which impacts gold sold relative to contained ounces produced. We effectively forego 41% of contained ounces per ounce sold. Total revenue from gold sales increased to approximately $95,000,000 for the year, compared to $50,000,000 in the prior year due to selling approximately 6,700 more ounces at an increased realized price of about $1,000 an ounce, despite the inventory buildup referenced earlier. Gross profit for the year improved to $11,500,000 compared to a gross loss of $15,700,000 in 2024, mainly due to the gross profit from Granite Creek being positive in 2025. The company reported a net loss of just under $200,000,000, or $0.10 per share, while adjusted loss was $123,000,000 compared to $111,000,000 the prior year. The roughly $75,000,000 difference between net and adjusted loss was related to non-cash fair value revaluation losses, which are mainly attributable to the increase in metals prices and our share price during 2025, and a non-cash write-down at Lone Tree for assets that were deemed obsolete under the updated refurbishment estimate released in December. The adjusted net loss was largely due to increased predevelopment, evaluation, and exploration expenses as development work increased across multiple projects as part of the company's development plan. Also, as a reminder, under US GAAP, which we transitioned to in 2024, predevelopment, evaluation, and exploration costs are expensed until we declare mineral reserves. We closed the quarter with a cash balance of approximately $63,000,000, down from the previous quarter due to a larger-than-normal buildup of finished goods and stockpile inventories at year-end, as well as the continued investment in drilling programs to support the plan's technical studies and the development plan, investments in Archimedes and Granite Creek development, along with early-stage activities under the limited notice to proceed at Lone Tree. The year-end balance is in line with our expectations under the recapitalization plan.

Moving to slide 13, I am very pleased to present the status of our recapitalization plan. We recently announced the culmination of a very competitive process that resulted in a financing package of up to $500,000,000. This financing package includes a commitment with Franco-Nevada for a $250,000,000 royalty, and a gold prepayment facility for up to $250,000,000 with National Bank of Canada and Macquarie Bank. The $250,000,000 Franco-Nevada royalty is in exchange for a 1.5% life-of-mine net smelter return royalty, stepping up to a 3% life-of-mine net smelter return royalty on 01/01/2031. This royalty will apply to production from all mineral properties in the portfolio. On closing, $225,000,000 will be made available to the company, of which $25,000,000 is required to be allocated to the advancement of Mineral Point in 2026. An additional $25,000,000 of the royalty financing is also expected to be made available in 2026 to further the advancement of Mineral Point following the expenditure of the initial disbursement towards the project. This will allow us to allocate $50,000,000 for resource expansion infill drilling, technical work, and early-stage permitting activities at Mineral Point in the year. The gold prepayment facility with National Bank and Macquarie includes an initial advance of $150,000,000 at closing with the obligation to deliver approximately 40,000 ounces of gold over a 30-month period beginning in January 2028. It also includes an accordion feature that provides access to an additional $100,000,000 for a 24-month period upon closing of the facility, and subject to customary conditions and lender approval. We anticipate executing the accordion feature in 2027, at which point the number of additional gold ounces to be delivered will be determined. Total ounces to be delivered for the full $250,000,000 gold prepayment facility are expected to represent less than 15% of total gold output over…

Well, you, Ryan, and finally turning to slide 15. As we look ahead, we are entering a pivotal period that positions the company to unlock meaningful shareholder value. Fifteen months ago, we laid out a new development plan. Twelve months ago, we filed five PEAs that demonstrated the value within that development plan. And then we spent the last twelve months moving that plan forward, advancing the technical work, and completing the recap. As we look forward over the next twelve to eighteen months, we will publish feasibility studies for our three high-grade underground projects, as well as likely a prefeasibility for our flagship Mineral Point project and potentially our Granite Creek open pit project. We will commence and be well advanced in the refurbishment of the Lone Tree autoclave, and we will be ramping up Archimedes production, our second underground mine. So the goal of the board and the management team over the next twelve to eighteen months is to move our current valuation from trading at a very significant discount to NAV to something closer to NAV as we continue to execute on the development plan that we laid out fifteen months ago. So we appreciate your continued support, and we look forward to updating you as we continue to execute on this development plan. We will now open for questions. Thank you.

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, we will now begin the question and answer session. You will hear a prompt that your hand has been raised. If you wish to decline from the polling process, please press star followed by the two. And if you are using a speakerphone, please lift the handset before pressing any keys. The first question comes from John Tumazos at John Tumazos Very Independent Research. Please go ahead.

Thank you very much for taking my question. Maybe the press release was a little bit concise in describing the Lone Tree $400,000,000 plus CapEx to restart the autoclaves. On a very simple level, the autoclaves are fixed steel vessels, and if they sit there idle ten years, they are not going to rust through. What are the ancillary things that get changed or that became obsolete, or the changes in design? I do not think you are going to put oxide material through the autoclave vessels, so maybe there are separate circuits. Please describe all the different changes to account for the autoclave project costing so much money. Did you go out to other engineering firms besides Hatch and get alternative proposals?

Yeah, John. So first of all, the autoclave vessel needs to be rebricked. They actually call that refractory as well. So that is a bit of a cost. The other thing is the CIL circuit itself. The tanks need to be replaced. We need to install some vessels for some of the off-gas. The other big cost is the filtration system, so we are going with filtered tails and stacked facilities, so it will not be the conventional slurry. And then the other thing is just upgrading some of the instrumentation. And then you add that all up with all those components, and it comes to $430,000,000 in today's capital environment. This project has been worked on for approximately four years. So no. There is a full explanation on our website. I encourage you to take a look at those details.

And, John, just as a reminder, Hatch actually built this facility back in the nineties and knew it better than any other group. They are a global leader in autoclave technology, and we are pleased to have the team on this refurbishment. Thank you. Thanks, John.

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, as a reminder, should you have any questions, next question comes from Don DeMarco from National Bank. Please go ahead.

Good morning, Richard and team. Thanks for taking my question. So first off, at Mineral Point, I see that some of the predevelopment work has been moved forward from 2028. By accelerating this work, does it provide the potential to develop or realize value on this project sooner than its current positioning in Phase Three? Okay. Great. Well, we will certainly look forward to that. And it is an interesting expansion opportunity there. My next question then, just looking at the production guidance, I mean, we are seeing higher production year-over-year. But without the details on costs or terms of the toll milling contracts, what is the best way to model these ounces and capture the year-over-year margin upside in a strong gold tape? So I guess a couple things. So the sulfide toll milling charge is about $275 to $280 per ton, which is about three times higher than what ultimately it will be when we put it through our own facility. You know, we are in a bit of a holding spot until the tech report is done. We will have the tech report completed in the second quarter. And with that, you will have a lot more detail on Granite Creek and the various elements of the cost structure. But until then, our hands are kind of tied. That news will come out in Q2, and just to remind everyone, we are now a US registrant, so we are not able to disclose the results of feasibility studies until the tech report is filed. And so that is why we will see the Cove and Granite Creek tech reports in Q2 as we complete those tech reports and publish them. But we will have a lot more detail on Granite Creek in Q2 as well as Cove, and then Archimedes to follow roughly about a year later. Okay. Great. Well, we will look forward to that. In the interim, we see that the production is higher year-over-year and the gold price is higher year-over-year. But anyway, I will jump back in the queue. That is all for me. Thank you.

Don, yeah, thank you. Yes. So from our perspective and really even from the time that I joined, it was clear that Mineral Point was the most valuable asset within the portfolio, and anything that we could do to accelerate its development would be beneficial to shareholders. So as a result, and with higher gold prices and the recap that we have done, we now have the financial flexibility to advance the drilling and technical work and advance permitting, and we are looking at every option available to us to accelerate that permitting and the ultimate development, likely targeting ahead of the original schedule in the development plan. And just for a reminder to the broader group, based on the 280,000 ounces of gold-equivalent production over a 17-year mine life at basic cost of about $1,400 an ounce. Now with this infill and step-out program that Paul mentioned, we do believe that there are opportunities to expand the resource and ultimately reserve base of this project through the program that has been designed for 2026. Thanks, Don. And just as a reminder, we did generate gross profit at Granite Creek in the second half of the year as we had guided at the outset. And with these higher metal prices, it will generate free cash flow or be expected to even after development costs, growth capital, and the additional infill and step-out drill programs that we have got planned for 2026. Thank you.

We have no further questions at this time. I will turn the call back over to Richard Young for closing comments.

Well, I would like to thank everyone for joining us on this Friday morning. We are excited by the progress that we have made over the last fifteen months. And we believe over the next fifteen to eighteen months we are going to be a long way advanced on completing Phase One of our development plan, which will take production to 150,000 to 200,000 ounces per year at strong margins and free cash flow, as well as moving forward on Mineral Point and our Granite Creek open pit as part of Phase Two and Three. So a lot more news to come as we progress through the course of this year. So thank you very much for your time this morning.

Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes your conference call for today. Thank you for participating, and we ask that you please disconnect your lines.