Welcome to the Investcorp Earnings Conference Call. Your speakers for today's call are Mike Mauer; Chris Jansen; and Rocco DelGuercio. [Operator Instructions] A question-and-answer session will follow the presentation.I'll now turn the call over to your speakers. Gentlemen, you may begin.

Thank you, operator, and thank you all of you for joining us this afternoon. I am joined by Chris Jansen, my Co-Chief Investment Officer; and Rocco DelGuercio, our CFO. Before we begin, Rocco will give our customary disclaimer regarding the information and forward-looking statements. Rocco?

Thanks Mike. I would like to remind everyone that today's call is being recorded and that this call is the property of Investcorp Credit Management BDC. Any unauthorized broadcast of this call in any form is strictly prohibited. Audio replay of the call will be available by visiting our Investor Relations page on our Web site at icmbdc.com.I would also like to call your attention to the Safe Harbor disclosure in our press release regarding forward-looking information and remind everyone that today's call may include forward-looking statements and projections, actual results may differ materially from these projections. We will not update forward-looking statements unless required by law. To obtain copies of our latest SEC filings, please visit our Investor Relations page on our Web site.At this time, I would like to turn the call back to our Chairman and CEO, Michael Mauer.

Thanks Rocco. I want to begin by recognizing the extraordinary times we live in today. The COVID-19 pandemic has caused incredible suffering all over the world and the secondary economic effects have been devastating for both businesses and individuals. We count ourselves among the fortunate and that our team is all safe and healthy and we have been able to seamlessly transition our business to work-from-home environment. Our work to reposition and diversify our portfolio over the past few years has strengthened our position in the midst of this pandemic.We have derisked the portfolio through smaller average-sized positions and an increase in the number of industries we align to and an increase in our number of borrowers. Still, our credit standards have not wavered. By being cautious underwriters, we hope to minimize the number of our borrowers, which is very distressed even in the current environment.We have avoided some of the sectors, which has been hardest hit by the pandemic, such as hospitality, restaurants and retail. We have also been fortunate on occasion with the repayments, including a substantial one from Montreign which vastly improved our position as lenders, at the same time that the casino was closed. The vast majority of our borrowers have ample liquidity are less exposed than the average corporation and should not violate loan covenants. We aren't perfect. We do have four borrowers in the energy sector. Another, Techniplas has struggled with the unprecedented disruption of the auto supply chain in the U.S. and Europe. These are reasons to be cautious but on balance, we are optimistic that our portfolio is well-positioned through this volatile business cycle.As usual, Chris will discuss our investment activity during and after the quarter and then Rocco will walk through our financial results.I'll conclude with some commentary about a few of our investments and conclude my prepared remarks with commentary on our levers, Investcorp's share purchases, our dividends and our outlook for the next few months.As always, we'll end with Q&A. With that, I'll turn it over to Chris.

Thanks Mike.We invested in six portfolio companies this quarter, including four new portfolio companies. All of our investments were first lien. These additions were made between early January and early March. We also had two full realizations during the quarter and three partial realizations. After quarter end, we made two investments in existing portfolio companies, one of which was simply funding under an existing revolving commitment.First, our additional investments in existing portfolio companies: we invested opportunistically in RPX, which has been one of our best-performing borrowers. RPX repaid a majority of its term loan via an asset sale in December 2019 and we purchased some of the loans to hold a better size position. The yield on this new purchase was approximately 8.1%. ACProducts refinanced its debt facilities in February. We had a full realization of our existing position and made an investment in the new term loan.Our IRR under realization was approximately 14.3%. Our yield at cost on the new loan is lower at 7.8%. As I mentioned on our last call, we also invested in Alta Equipment Group. Alta is the largest integrated equipment dealership platform in the United States that was acquired by SPAC. Our first lien loan yields approximately 12.2% of cost.We invested in a first lien loans Pixelle Specialty Solutions, a portfolio company of Lindsay Goldberg, which backed the acquisition of two paper mills from Verso. Pixelle is a leading producer of specialty grade papers. Our yield to cost is approximately 8.3%.We also participated in a club deal for Gexpro Services, which is owned by Luther King Capital. This first lien loan appears in our schedule of investments as GS Operating. Gexpro is a distributor of sea parts, which includes fasteners, valves, fittings, plastic parts and other high SKU count, low value parts. Our yield…

Thanks Chris.For the quarter ended March 31, 2020, our net investment income was $3.4 million or $0.25 per share. The fair value of our portfolio was $274.9 million compared to $305 million at December 31. Our portfolio's net decrease from operations this quarter was approximately $24.2 million.Our new investments during the quarter had an average yield of 9.1% and investments exited during the quarter had an average yield of 11.2% and a realized average IRR of 11.6%. The average yield of our portfolio was 10.05%, a decrease of 36 basis points from December 31.As of March 31, our portfolio consisted of 38 portfolio companies, 84.3% of our investments were first lien, 11.3% of the portfolio was second lien investment and 3.7% was in unitranche investments, 98.1% of our debt portfolio was invested in floating rate loans and 1.9% in fixed rate investments.Our average portfolio company investment was approximately $7.2 million, and our largest portfolio company investment was Endemol at $14.9 million. We were 1.64x levered as of March 31 compared to 1.23x levered as of December 31.Finally, with respect to our liquidity, as of March 31, we had $11 million in cash, $21.1 million in restricted cash and $18.3 million of capacity under our revolving credit facility with UBS. Subsequent to quarter end, we reduced the term loan by $20 million and as of today, we have $16.3 million in cash, $2.1 million in restricted cash and are fully drawn on our $30 million revolver.Additional information regarding the composition of our portfolio is included in our Form 10-Q, which was filed after.With that, I'd like to turn the call back over to Mike.

Thank you, Rocco.I'd like to provide updates on a few of the investments in our portfolio. Unprecedented disruption in oil and gas markets have also impacted several of our investments. Since January, the U.S. onshore rig count has declined by more than 50% and the price per barrel of WTI oil has dropped from 60 into the 20s as a result of plummeting global demand and the well-publicized feud between Saudi Arabia and Russia.The resulting slowdown in drilling and even production activities have impacted our two borrowers in the fracking industry, Liberty and ProFrac and also Oilfield Water Logistics as well as 1888.To start with our fracking company, we are encouraged by the fact that each Liberty and ProFrac took early proactive measures to drive liquidity and reduce costs. In the case of Liberty, the company has extremely low debt levels and enough liquidity to cover a prolonging downturn. The company publicly announced significant cost-cutting measures and anticipate that even in the current market conditions, it will maintain a portion of risk-free assets and will remain cash flow positive.Likewise, in discussions with ProFrac's management, we have high confidence that the company is taking the necessary steps to what are their current market conditions and expect the company to be stable and to have sufficient liquidity for the foreseeable future.Additionally, the Wilks family who owns ProFrac has demonstrated the ability and willingness to support the company with additional equity to be able to utilize. Lastly in both cases, it is noteworthy that both companies have frac fleets with asset values in excess of both current and projected debt levels, providing an additional margin of safety for us as first lien lenders.1888 is operating in the same challenging environment as Liberty and ProFrac driven primarily by decrease in the rig count. With…

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Christopher Nolan.

Mike, what is the plan in terms of lowering the leverage ratio going forward?

Yes, Chris. First, I'd like to apologize to everybody. I assume you had the same quality I had in, apologies for that. So to the extent that anything wasn't audible, please chime in and ask me to clarify because, at least on my end, it was not as clear as it has been historically.On leverage, Chris, we are targeting to be more in the 1.2x, not the 1.5x in our 1.2x to 1.5x. We're at 1.6x and change because of the write-downs in NAV. That also dovetails with, you heard we had paid down some of the revolver. We're using the term loan, and we're now using the revolver because we don't need as much between term and revolver when we were targeting a little more leverage.In the current environment, we will continue to run at the lower end. That having been said, we're at a higher multiple today because of the write-downs. We'll be prudent around that. We're not going to sell just to sell, but we're going to manage that down.

So is it fair to say that the priority right now would be lowering the leverage as opposed to and not growing the portfolio?

I would say, yes, but let me say, it's slightly different, which is the priority is to manage the existing portfolio not to grow it, to make sure we preserve capital selectively as we get any repayments we may redeploy, but it is not targeted on growing the portfolio today.

Great. And then Techniplas, was that a new non-accrual in the second quarter since April?

Yes. So technically, Techniplas was not non-accrual at 3/31, it is today. So when we say we have one non-accrual, that's today. They paid their interest through the March quarter, and it was about to have a very nice influx of capital from a sponsor. And when COVID happened, all of that fell apart and we are in bankruptcy, restructuring it now. So it was not non-accrual before.

Our next question comes from Robert Dodd.

On the dividends, obviously, cut the base to $0.15. And then the $0.03 supplement, any color you can give us on whether that supplemental is going to be formulaic Board discrete, I mean everything is Board discretion. But in terms of how the two components are going to interact going forward versus NII as well, right?

Yes, Robert. We spent a lot of time around this. I'm not sure there's a right way to do it. We think we're doing it the right way. We know that over the next 6 months and hopefully, it's not 18 months that the global economies and the U.S. economies are going to recover at some pace, we are being somewhat prudent in expecting that to be a slow pace. We hope it's quicker.With all that having been said, we are looking at NII and managing the portfolio, we want to have a base level that we're comfortable that we will cover and that's the $0.15. We believe there should be some above that where that will play out with time and we will reassess that quarterly. The supplemental will be formulaic. It is meant to be a proxy for what we expect that to be at each quarter end. It may be a little above or below, but it will be formulaic of expected NII.

Got it. Appreciate that. And then on liquidity, not the portfolio companies, I mean thank you for all the color you provided on the energy investments and then Techniplas as well. If we look beyond that into the rest of the portfolio, could you give us any assessment of how much the remainder of the portfolio beyond those called-out assets has what you would call a low, moderate or maybe high risk exposure to COVID and some combination of operational exposure versus liquidity. Obviously, if a business has no revenue, but has 24 months of liquidity, it's less worrying than another. So any color you can give us around that kind of thought process?

Yes. Robert, it's Chris. We've done some really detailed analysis on the portfolio, as you would expect. We look at about 25% to 30% of our portfolio as being more severely impacted by COVID, including all of our oil and gas exposure, and there's an argument, how much of that is COVID, how much is not.Of those, we have probably about half of that amount as lower liquidity. So roughly 15% of the portfolio. And some of that was including Techniplas which as Mike had mentioned, is filed for bankruptcy last week and the bondholder group is supporting that through the bankruptcy process then as you want.

Got it. I appreciate that color. And then, [Technical Difficulty].

And Robert, just to add to that, I don't know if this is part of your question. When we think about request for relief from covenants, we have just shy of 40 investments and less than a handful of them have asked for covenant relief, where almost two-thirds, 60%, plus or minus, have covenants. So we are not sitting with a 90% covenant light basket here. We've got vast majority are covenant and we've only had a handful of requests. I'd expect we get more requests for some covenant relief as we go out further, but we have not seen people coming with a lot of amendments and ask for liquidity to-date.

Got it. I appreciate that. And then on your side, so I mean your liquidity, $16 million in cash today, right, and the fully drawn revolver. I presume you think that's sufficient to fund any liquidity requests that do come in from portfolio companies, even if you do not get additional repayments. But what's the margin of error there in terms, if you do get more request for the relief, request for the liquidity, if this situation drags on longer, what are your resources to incrementally add liquidity to your own balance sheet?

Yes. There's two or three ways that we have thought about that. Number one is revolver claims on up. It's $2 million, $3 million of revolver claims that are truly outside of our control as the lender group. The other ones have a lot of gating, a lot of requirements or discretion on the lenders. So we do not have significant revolver exposure by design in our portfolio. That's number one.Number two is, when we think about self-help and other things, I've included what we know about in that number. Number three is, we do expect that there will be at least $10 million to $20 million of repayments over the near term, i.e., before 6/30. We will assess liquidity needs over that period of time and whether or not we pay down revolver and keep some extra liquidity there.And then lastly, the UBS, as you know, is our liquidity provider and they basically said they want to talk to us about extending and other things. And we're kind of waiting and I think it will probably be mid-summer before we get into those because of a lot of other disruption away from the BDC sector actually. It's not even in the corporate; it's more in a lot of the mortgage sector. So we think we've got more than adequate liquidity today. We've got cushions on top of that in our leverage facility with UBS that we think are adequate and we have some liquidity coming.

Our next question comes from Paul Johnson.

One more on the credit facility. As far as your availability goes today, I think you said you had about, correct me if I'm wrong, $21 million drawn today on the revolver in the second quarter. Is the capacity completely available there for you to draw on or are there any sort of borrower restrictions in the facility that limit the availability?

Just to clarify, I think as of today, what we've done is, we have drawn our revolver at the BDC and paid down our term loan. So we are drawn under the revolver. There's not additional capacity there. We've got about $15 million of cash on top of other buffers that we've got, but the actual cash is about $15 million that we have. So there is not additional revolver capacity and we don't think we need it.

Okay. Thanks for that. And then as far as fair value marks this quarter, I'm just curious if you could talk a little bit about your process. When you were going through this process of marketing these companies, did you incorporate any sort of forward-looking projections or were these primarily based off of more historical performance plus market spread adjustments?

Yes, Paul. It's Chris Jansen. We did more of the latter. It's really difficult. The crystal ball gets a little foggy, depending on how companies come back. So when this first, we started first hearing rumblings of this. We did some really thorough analysis on what we felt the liquidity that our individual investments had. So not really looking at enterprise value, but was like, right, what do companies have in their coffers to sustain themselves against this?And for men, we went on to say, okay, which companies do we think are going to be most impacted and why? So with that as a backdrop, we went through the portfolio and said, we did more of our traditional valuation analysis to say the companies that we felt very confident would make it through this, which was the vast majority of them.And we did some spread widening and more or less where the market spreads had widened versus where we think companies will be performing in the new COVID environment? So it was pretty similar to what we've been doing before, but with our COVID analysis and liquidity analysis as a backdrop but more succinctly.

Sure. Okay. And I guess the last question I had just had to do more with the broader platform. I'm curious as we entered this crisis and we're entering potentially what's very likely to be a recession. How have you guys shifted any resources at the firm to focus on potentially your highest liquidity need companies or credit trouble in the portfolio or basically just how are you shifting those personnel around or resources to help support your portfolio today?

Yes. I think it's a great question. We are a team of about 10 people. We all get involved. We do take specialists by industry and by restructuring expertise. And given that the portfolio is less than 40 names, we're not dealing with 150, 200 names. We're able to take the people who have the industry expertise and the senior Chris and myself are involved literally down to minutiae in each and every name that is having any type of discussion around whether not it's amendment, restructuring with advisers, lawyers, et cetera. So we are nimble enough that we can shift based upon industry and restructuring expertise.

And a good example of that is 1888 where Mike literally rolls to sleeves up on that credit more than anybody else on the team. So Mike has vast experience in things and refinancings from his prior career, so I think he understates his ability to do that.

Our next question comes from [David Rothschild] [ph].

As far as your market price is so far below your net asset value and I know you talked here a lot about your credits. Does your guys' line of credit allow you to buy back more shares and if so, why aren't you doing that at this kind of discount?

So from our line of credit, we're borrowed against that. And so liquidity is very important, Mr. Rothschild around all the investments. And at this point, I think it's important to make sure that we're maintaining the overall portfolio. I understand your question about the trading level versus the NAV. I'd say we've got a lot of company across the BDC sector in discount, whether or not you are at $0.30 or $0.60, you are at a deep discount. I think part of it is making sure that you maintain the liquidity to maintain your investments. The second is the next stage beyond that is for a rebound and to appreciate the NAV and I think if we do that right, we should get our trading levels back up into that 60, 70, 80-plus range. And that's really the primary. And we absolutely are focused on the share price, but buying back stock right now is not a good use of our liquidity.

Yes. It seems like 50% return is a good return.

[Operator Instructions] At this time, we have no further questions.

Thank you everyone. We appreciate your time and look forward to talking to you in the future.

This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for attending.