Good day ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to First Quarter 2019 Illumina Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct a question-and answer session and instructions will follow at that time. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference call may be recorded. I would now like to introduce your host for today’s conference Ms, Jacquie Ross, VP of Investor Relations, ma’am you may begin.

Thank you, Daniel. Good afternoon, everyone, and welcome to our earnings call for the first quarter of 2019. During the call today, we will review the financial results released after the close of the market and offer commentary on our commercial activity, after which we will host a question-and-answer session. If you've not had a chance to review the earnings release, it can be found in the Investor Relations section of our website at illumina.com. Participating for Illumina today will be Francis deSouza, President and Chief Executive Officer; and Sam Samad, Chief Financial Officer. Francis will provide an update on the state of our business and Sam will review our financial results. This call is being recorded and the audio portion will be archived in the Investors section of our website. It is our intent that all forward-looking statements regarding our financial results and commercial activity made during today's call will be protected under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual events or results may differ materially from those projected or discussed. All forward-looking statements are based upon current available information and Illumina assumes no obligation to update these statements. To better understand the risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ, we refer you to documents that Illumina files with the Securities and Exchange Commission including Illumina’s most recent Forms 10-Q and 10-K. With that, I will now turn the call over to Francis.

Thank you, Jacquie. Good afternoon, everyone. Illumina had a great start to 2019, generating revenue of $846 million in the first quarter of 2019, up 8% from the same quarter a year ago, and our 10th consecutive quarter of consistent, strong execution. Additionally, this quarter represented the first time in Illumina’s history that our order volume exceeded $1 billion. We continue to see strong demand for sequencing consumables, with first quarter revenue of $481 million, up 14% from the same quarter a year ago. This performance was driven by growth in a broad range of applications across our sequencing system family. Over the last year, we have been working to increase visibility into the application growth drivers of our business. As a result, we are now able to share the approximate size and growth of a number of categories within our sequencing consumable business. We plan to update this on an annual basis with the understanding that these data points are directional. With the analysis complete, I'm pleased to share that about 40% of our sequencing consumable shipments in 2018 was associated with clinical applications. From largest to smallest, this includes testing for oncology, reproductive health, genetic disease, and other. This group includes IDD and LDC validation, in addition to clinical testing, and grew approximately 30% in 2018. Within clinical, oncology testing applications represented a little under 20% of our sequencing consumable shipments in 2018. Positive developments in the regulatory and reimbursement landscape are improving patient access to genomic profiling. For example, FoundationOne CDx received FDA approval in November 2017 and a national coverage decision for CMS in March of last year. Guardant Health has reported growing adoption of Guardant 360 following a favorable local coverage determination for select non-small cell lung cancer patients in September of 2018. This was…

Thanks, Francis. As discussed, first quarter revenue grew 8% year-over-year to 846 million, driven by 11% growth in sequencing and slightly offset by a 3% decline in microarrays revenue. In terms of geographic performance, America's revenue of 473 million was up 8% year-over-year, driven primarily by our sequencing business, including sequencing consumable growth associated with clinical oncology applications. EMEA revenue of 210 million was up 8% year-over-year. Growth in sequencing consumables more than offset the expected decline in sequencing services associated with Joel during the transition to the National Health Service. Our strategic focus in emerging markets such as the Middle East, Africa and Russia is showing early promise with a record number of sequencing systems and sequencing consumables delivered in the quarter. Greater China grew 13% year-over-year to 88 million, or 19%, allowing for the $5 million of stocking order that we shipped in the fourth quarter of 2018. Growth was driven primarily by sequencing consumables for NIPT and oncology applications in addition to arrays. APJ grew 7% year-over-year to 75 million with growth driven by last service customers and oncology applications. Moving to sequencing, consumable revenue grew 14% from the same quarter a year ago to 481 million, or 15%, allowing for the 5 million stocking order that shipped in Q4. We did not receive any stocking orders in China in Q1. From a pull-through perspective, NovaSeq pull through was approximately 1 million per system per year in 2018. And HiSeq was approximately 300,000 per system per year. Consistent with our prior practice, these pull through metrics reflect both system consumables and an allocation for library prep. We do not intend to update these on a quarterly basis, given the ongoing platform transition, but will provide pull through as part of our annual installed base update going forward.…

Thank you, Sam. A few closing remarks before we open it up for questions. First, we remain confident in the trajectory and speed of the multi-year NovaSeq transition. We are very pleased with the progress among our still to convert HiSeq customers and expect closer to 50% of the original installed base will have started or completed their conversions by the end of the year. We're seeing momentum across a broad range of sequencing applications. Q1 saw a promising data for liquid biopsy and TMB for example. And while it's early days, we're very pleased with the initial feedback and growing demand we're seeing for TSO500. Additionally, we continue to see positive coverage decisions in clinical oncology, genetic disease and reproductive health testing. We're also seeing momentum in population genomics with initiatives around the world looking to build on the experience of GEL to deliver powerful genomic insights for their populations. It will take time, but the path is increasingly well defined. To best enable our sequencing and array customers in both the clinical and research markets, Illumina invested 20% in R&D for the first quarter to support the most exciting portfolio of innovations we've ever had. We remain committed to delivering the most innovative and effective platforms available, supported by a world class service organization that delivers and serves more than 6,300 customers and 13,000 systems in 90 countries. Later this year, we expect to close the acquisition of Pacific Biosciences and look forward to sharing more information on our plans at that time. Combining the two technologies positions us to reach more applications, accelerate the pace of genomic discovery and bolster our innovation engine, which has been a hallmark of Illumina since our inception. We're excited about bringing together highly accurate short and long read sequencing technologies, which will pave the path to a more perfect view of a genome. Certainly, I can't think of a more exciting time for the PacBio team to be joining the Illumina family, and I look forward to welcoming them this summer. With that, I'll open the call up for questions.

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Ross Muken with Evercore.

Good afternoon, guys and appreciate all the super helpful color. Maybe just starting on sort of the obvious in terms of instruments on the sequencing side, obviously, you gave the order commentary and gave us some helpful thoughts around, Sam, sort of the 4Q versus 1Q dynamic in terms of some of the number of placements, I guess, as we just think about that second half ramp, and obviously, the waiting here being a little bit atypical versus maybe last year, of the pieces you gave us are up some of the parts that are moving into the back half, how much of that is do you have, like, you know, a very high line of sight to and then how much of it would you say maybe there's sort of a moderate confidence interval and then where if anywhere does any sort of risk play in, in terms of levels. I'm just trying to get a sense for the sort of visibility to some of the different drivers because it is sometimes hard for us, particularly on some of these pop studies to understand the cadence. And so any color just around sort of where you've got ultimate visibility versus not would be, I think, super helpful.

Sure, Ross. I’ll start by saying that, overall, we feel really good about our pipeline, as we look at the rest of the year. And we believe the pipeline is there to support the 13% to 14% growth we talked about. In terms of some of the bigger deals that we talked about in the script that are in the back half of the year, as you can imagine, we are deeply engaged with a lot of the population genomics efforts underway. So all of us here in the US, both GEL and the NHS in the UK, the population deal in France and Singapore and Dubai and so on. So we have teams that are deeply engaged and have been working with those initiatives now for some time. As you can imagine, with each of those deals, there are a number of moving parts that have to be lined up. So there is always the chance to deals move a little bit. But at this point, we have very high confidence that the deals will happen. And while there may be some flex in terms of the timing when they launch, we have a lot of confidence that, a, they'll happen and b, they'll be of the size and scale that they've been talking about. So we've been deeply engaged and we have very high line of sight into those initiatives only out.

Thank you. And our next question comes from Doug Schenkel with Cowen and Company.

I'd like to maybe take a different shot at trying to unpack the pacing of full year guidance and really the logic behind it. So specifically on sequencing consumables, sequencing consumables grew 14% in the first quarter, that was a bit better than we expected, even adjusted for some of the new ways that you're reporting sequencing this quarter, basically consolidating the other line there. So that's obviously a positive. At the same time, you're guiding us to assume that sequencing consumables will grow 20% or more for the year. So mathematically, this would require 25% growth over the balance of the year in this category, comparisons don't get easier until Q4, you guided Q2 probably a little bit below what we were looking for. Again, recognizing all the details that are new that you provided, which are helpful, I'm just wondering if you can help us understand what gives you the continued confidence that you can get to that 20% sequencing consumables growth number for the year. You mentioned, PopSeq, if we pulled that all into sequencing, and it may not all be there. But if all of that comes in in the second half in sequencing, which I think you said is 55 million incremental, that's six points of growth over H2 of last year. So I don't think that alone is enough to get you there. So what specifically are you seeing, because that continues to be the biggest question we're getting, and I think the biggest overhang for the year? Thank you.

Yeah, so let me start Doug by addressing that. So, with regards to Q1, yes, as you mentioned, we grow 14% in terms of sequencing consumables. As we look at Q2, as I mentioned in my prepared remarks, our expectation for sequencing as a whole is to grow in the, essentially the low double digits or approximately 12%. If you also exclude some of the one-time factors that we had in Q2 related to some tariff stocking, that sequencing consumable growth in the second quarter is improved by roughly three percentage points. In sequencing as a whole, we expect that business to grow by about 15% in the second quarter. Now, as you think about the ramp in the second half, obviously, as we've talked about in the prepared remarks, there's a significant ramp in the second half. You would say, I mean, traditionally, we've probably been in more the 48% to 52% in the second half, building in terms of revenues. Right now, we're saying it's more 46% to 54%. But if you factor in the ramp from some of the population genomics initiative, it probably normalizes closer to 47% to 53%. With regards to some of the things that are going to drive that backend loading or some of the improvements in sequencing consumables in the second half, obviously, the ramp in terms of instrument placements is back end loaded as well and that's going to carry with it consumable utilization. And we are seeing very strong consumable utilization across our instruments. I mentioned the NovaSeq pull through number, which was $1 million in 2018. We expect that to improve as we go forward. So that's our expectation, and we see no reason to not expect that. And then the other metric that I mentioned, actually, another couple of metrics that I mentioned, one was around our, I would say, our largest customers and those are experiencing a 40% growth in terms of sequencing consumables across their clinical application. So that's a significant growth, we're seeing very, very strong utilization in those group of customers. And then the last one is around some of the metrics that we mentioned overall around clinical utilization and growth in sequencing consumables across clinical. For 2018, that was a growth of 30%. For Q1, that was actually a growth of over 20%. And we expect that for the full year to grow in line with what we saw in 2018. And again, we're seeing some very strong indications with the applications that we see that are growing in clinical. So we feel really bullish about the second half. Obviously, it's a steep path, as we talked about, but we have very good indications for the achievability of it.

And our next question comes from Tycho Peterson with JP Morgan.

I want to start with instruments again. Looking at your guidance for the quarter, you did still come up a little bit short by about 6 million versus what you've guided to. And, I know you said NovaSeq orders were in line with expectations. But I'm just curious if you could elaborate a little bit, you called out some slippage in installations. Basically, I'm just trying to get comfortable that, it's really a timing issue as opposed to anything in particular around competitive pressures. And then I'm curious Francis, if you can just talk on the reception to the S1 and S2 close out pricing changes and then also how S prime is maybe changing the discussions with the HiSeq customers?

Yeah, definitely. So I'll start by saying that, we had expected as we talked about a decline in sequencing instruments shipments, about 50 million between Q4 and Q1 and it came in about 56 million short. So, again, given the seasonality we did expect that decline. In NovaSeq specifically, I talked about the fact that from an orders perspective, we came in slightly ahead of expectations. Then we had a handful of instruments that are going to be shipping later this year. So they shipped out of this quarter. In terms of NovaSeq as a whole, obviously, we don't give out quarterly shipment numbers. But we are very happy with how the NovaSeq upgrade continues to play out. And we have good visibility into the shipments for the rest of 2019. We entered this year, as you know, with about 25% of the HiSeq customers having started their transitions, only 25% have started it all, the transition into NovaSeq. And as you can imagine, the first wave of adopters of NovaSeq were the large service providers, the large genome centers. So coming into this year with the launch of S prime and the adjustment in pricing for S1 and S2, really one of the stories for us this year is the activation of the smaller high throughput labs on that upgrade journey. And then that was exactly the intent of S prime that's wanting us to too. And that's starting to play out. So we saw that play out in the quarter. That pricing was well received. And I talked about some of the examples of customers that were still running the legacy HiSeq systems and were waiting for the price points at which they could move to the NovaSeq. So there was the customers that were running desktop instruments plus some of the older HiSeq instruments, and that's starting to play out. So what we expect then over the course of this year is to catalyze that group of customers and really get at the next 25% of the HiSeq installed base to get to upgrade over the course of this year. We expect the NovaSeq shipments to have a steep ramp over the course of the year. So in Q4, we expect to ship twice as many instruments for example, as we ship in Q1 of this year. So we expect that ramp and all that we think will sort of roll into a NovaSeq shipments number for the year that's flat to slightly up from last year. So very consistent with the multi-year upgrade thesis we had when we first launched NovaSeq.

Thank you. And our next question comes from Derik de Bruin with Bank of America.

This is Mike on for Derik. I had a quick question. Just want to follow up on some of the topics that you've touched on with the NovaSeq, you mentioned particular strength in the NextSeq and you notably upped the pull through range on that, which granted has been running pretty high for a while. I'm just wondering if, you know, do you think you've seen some possible trade down from the HiSeqs, customers that were sort of on the bubble of being a high throughput and a medium throughput, instead of moving to the NovaSeq, they’ve decided to use the NextSeq at a higher level. And also, you noted that you're no longer accepting orders for HiSeqs. I'm wondering, how that plays out into your thoughts on the NovaSeq upgrade cycle if that could add a boost this year?

Sure. So coming into the NovaSeq upgrade cycle, as we looked at the HiSeq installed base in its entirety, we always expected a small portion of them to move to the NextSeq rather than NovaSeq, but we thought that would be a small portion and that the vast majority of the HiSeq install base would move to the NovaSeq and that really is how it's playing out. We're also starting to see customers that were purely desktop customers and I mentioned one in the script that are now buying NovaSeqs as the -- their volume of business grows. And the other dynamic that we didn't quite expect as well as it did was as we're seeing a quarter of all NovaSeq orders coming from new to sequencing customers and so that played out a little bit better than we expected. NextSeq continues to be a workforce instrument. We did raise the range for its pull through, because we've seen pull through at the high end of the previous range now for many, many quarters. It continues to be the workhorse in the clinical customer base, and people especially like the DX availability as well. So we continue to see strength in NextSeqs and NextSeqs and MiSeqs both were up year on year in terms of shipments of instruments.

Our next question comes from Bill Quirk with Piper Jaffray.

Question regarding the -- just again, kind of going back to guidance, Francis, just help us think a little bit about, are you dialing anything into the expectations for items where Illumina has a little less control over the situation and examples that come to mind to be things like ACOG endorsement for average risk or say the timing of oncology test approvals by some of your customers, for example, and then separately, staying on the FDA for a moment, when should we anticipate the TSO500 approval? Thanks, guys.

Sure, so if we look at how we built up our revenue expectation for the year, we haven't built in really expectations around any material changes around ACOG guidelines over the course of the year. Momentum for those guidelines to change continues to build and we do believe that ultimately they will be supportive of average risk testing, but we haven't built that into our expectations over the course of this year. And neither have we built in on the oncology side, any dramatic changes either in the reimbursement environment or the regulatory environment. In terms of FDA approval, we were very excited that after we launched TSO500, we got breakthrough designation by the FDA. What that means is we are on an expedited path to get approval from the FDA for TSO500. And so, if we're doing the work with them, as you know, if you get breakthrough designation, that means that you have dedicated resources from the FDA, you can work with them on an expedited basis. You can design the data that you need with them up front before you turn it in. And so, we're continuing to move down that path, as quickly as we can. In addition, we're also continuing to move down the path of having TSO500 be a companion diagnostic for the therapies associated with the partnerships that we signed up. So for example, the two therapies from BMS, and there, we achieved an important milestone in our partnership with them in Q1. So that continues to move forward well as well.

Maybe just to add one quick thing, though, as I mentioned earlier, the second half ramp that we have and which is essentially a driver of guidance for the year and a precondition for us, hitting guidance for the year is really driven off of the sequencing consumable utilization run rates and expectations that we are seeing. So when we talked about the 2018, for instance, 30% growth in sequencing consumables in clinical applications, that's the expectation for the second half. Having said this, there is a portion that I talked about in the prepared remarks, which is contingent on population genomics initiatives. And those are in various degrees. Some are underway and some will ramp in the second half and I refer to 55 million in terms of second half versus first half growth. So obviously, when you have population genomics initiatives, which, essentially you have to work with different governments and involve multiple stakeholders, and in some cases, regulatory approvals, there is a level of uncertainty with those. But at this point, there is nothing to lead us to believe that those are not going to materialize in the second half. And we feel strongly about that.

And I just wanted to comment, TSO500 REO is available today. So while we're continuing to work with the FDA on getting an IVD, TSO500 REO is available and shipping today.

Thank you. And our next question comes from Dan Brennan with UBS.

Just had a two parter kind of on NovaSeq as we look out to the second half of the year. Francis, could you just help us think about in terms of that S 1 and S prime opportunity amongst your 800 customers, how many of those are represented by like the smaller labs, excuse me, that are targets for S1 and S prime and then sorry, just to clarify, apologize if you said this already. But when we think about the doubling of placements in the fourth quarter, how much of that is actually expected to actually come from these top 6 programs buying? Thank you.

Sure. So let me start with the NovaSeq question. So look, when we looked at the installed base of HiSeq and HiSeq, about 850 customers, as we started the upgrade cycle from NovaSeq, less than 50 of those were customers that also had the HiSeq X. And so those were the customers that were the very large service providers, the very large genome centers. And so, 800 out of the 850 were not of that scale. And so, S prime and S1, S2 are very important to a very big part of the HiSeq install base. Until S prime shipped, actually, if you were a HiSeq 2500 customer, and you weren't running, a large degree of samples, it was hard for you to make the economic case so that you get paid back in a reasonable time. But now with S prime, you can make the case where you will see pay back in the one to two year period, depending on your sample volume. And so now with the current sort of portfolio, we are making the case that resonates with that large part of the install base. And I said one of the stories of 2019 is going to be the activation of that large segment of the HiSeq installed base to begin the upgrade. So that was the first question. What was the second?

So the second was around how much of the Q4 additional NovaSeq placements or the doubling of NovaSeq placements versus Q1 is related to PopGen. I believe that was the question and listen, the expectation is, obviously, that we have a ramp in the second half in terms of instrument placements versus the first half and we talked about the Q4 versus Q1 NovaSeq placements, there is a portion of this related to some PopGen initiatives, but a lot of it is also driven by seasonality, as you know, from Q4 2018, we had record number of NovaSeq placements in Q4 of 2018. And we expect a similar pattern in Q4 2019.

So if I look into and all that, I’d say, we came into this year with 25% of the HiSeq installed base having begun that upgrade process. We expect to exit this year with another 25% having engaged and either completed or begun the upgrade process. A significant percentage of those will be the smaller high throughput genome centers for whom S prime, S1, S2 will be very important. There will be though other important segments. We continue to see a quarter of orders for NovaSeq coming from new to alumina, for example, and there will be capacity adds from the larger centers that have already bought their first NovaSeqs, but are adding additional NovaSeqs as they moved around and samples over from their HiSeqs. You'll also start to see the effect of some of the large funding program like TopMed, sort of switch from being a headwind to the upgrade to NovaSeq to being more of a tailwind. And that'll play out too.

Thank you. And our next question comes from Puneet Souda with SVB Leerink.

Thanks for the details. My question is around PopSeq specifically, in terms of, what's your assumption built in here for the genome cost? And, how do you see that driving an increasing level of adoption into PopSeq market longer term? I mean, I appreciate your comments around 55 million, but just hoping to understand this PopSeq growth in the context of the $100 genome that you've talked about in past and anything around the timing associated with that. And just a second part of the question is largely around consumer genomics. How do you see that market evolving here? Do you see this market shifting away from more of a consumer health demand to a more robust consumer health product, where customers are demanding more accurate data, more decision making healthcare data, is that's what's slowing down some of the growth that you pointed out? Thank you.

Sure. So I’ll start with the population genomics customers sets and -- the potential customers that that we were talking to and pricing associated with that. So we have a pricing model that we put together that rewards customers for being higher volume customers. So the level of discount you can achieve gets greater, the more you commit on the instrument side and on the consumable side as well. But it is a single matrix that we use with the different customers that we talk to. And so, we're very transparent about what the pricing looks like and how different customers can achieve different tiers of discounts. Today, some of the largest customers, as you know, are already at below $1,000 a genome. And so there's room to give them additional discounts below what they can do today to enable those very large scale efforts. However, even at the very larger scale, they're not yet at the stage where they're getting to $100 genome. So that's still in front of us. But there are volume discounts. Now, in terms of the dynamic playing out in the consumer business, what we are seeing in the consumer business is really the market for health applications starting to build and the market really moving from being a pure genealogy market, where a lot of the growth was driven over the last few years to being more of a health market and so that market is in transition. Ultimately, the health market is a much bigger market than the genealogy market, we believe. And so we expect that growth to continue and to resume once that transition, you know, really gets underway. And that's what we believe we're seeing. The other dynamic that's in play is that, if you looked at the DTC genomics business, really over the last few years, it's been dominated by two, maybe three players in the US, right. And now we're seeing a lot more players emerge around the world. And so that market is going to be a lot less concentrated going forward, both in terms of geography and in terms of customers, as we look at 2020 and beyond.

And our next question comes from Patrick Donnelly with Goldman Sachs.

Maybe just on the HiSeq transition over to Nova, now that you're not accepting HiSeq orders anymore, perhaps accelerating the transition over to Nova, how do you ensure there's no air pocket on the consumables as an elevated number of these HiSeq users shift over to Novas and get those new systems up to speed? And then are you seeing any users with multiple HiSeqs Seas consolidate down to just one Nova? Or has it been more one for one on a conversion ratio?

Our experience so far and we shared some of the data a little while ago was that customers that have both a HiSeq and NovaSeq, they were HiSeq customers, and they purchase NovaSeq, spend more with us on average than they did before. And so we did an analysis and we shared that data a little while ago. And so that's what we expect to continue to see that if you are a large research customer, and you get a grant, with NovaSeq, what you are looking to do is power your experiments better. And so, you will still spend the grant money that you have, but you will just do a bigger experiment. It also has allowed people to define more ambitious experiments either in terms of using new paradigms like single cell or an analysis for example. If you're starting to see the design of bigger experiments, as customers and researchers start to think about how they can use the additional power of the NovaSeq. So it has not been the experience we've had so far that customers experience that air pocket in any significant way. And in fact, that was our thesis going in that there is elasticity in this market based on what our customers have told us and that they wanted the additional power of NovaSeq to do bigger experiments. In terms of the ratios, one of the things we said coming into the NovaSeq upgrade cycle is that it's probably not the right way to think about it in terms of a ratio of HiSeqs to NovaSeq, probably the better way to think about it is number of customers out, right. So you have the 850 customers I talked about, start from that number and work out rather than taking the total number of HiSeqs and work back. And so -- and that's been our experience now as it's played out that, customers fundamentally do more work with a NovaSeq than they were able to do with a HiSeq. And so it's not just a straight ratio that they're applying.

Thank you. And our next question comes from Dan Leonard with Deutsche Bank.

So just a quick modeling question for Sam and then a philosophical follow up for Francis. So first off on modeling. Sam, can you disclose how much of the sequencing service revenue in a quarter was one time, you mentioned a milestone payment and a non-recurring IP payment? That would be helpful as I'm trying to assess the core run rate? And then secondly, philosophically, Francis, how are you thinking about operating leverage going forward? And I'm asking because SG&A came in, while our model was down sequentially, which is not very usual, you’re de-consolidating Helix which allowed you to raise EPS guide, is there more operating leverage or more of an operating leverage angle to this story going forward and perhaps people appreciate it.

So let me start with the modeling one, Dan. So we haven't disclosed exactly how much that licensing revenue amount is. But think about it this way in terms of Q1. We, if you think about it sequentially from Q4, we did have a drop off in that sequencing and other related to the GEL revenues that -- with the completion of the 100,000 project. We did expect and had the drop off in terms of GEL revenues. The drop off wasn't as much as we expected, because there are still some samples being sequenced in GEL, they have collected more samples, and they're still utilizing or doing sequencing on those samples. And then the other two large components I would say is we had some milestone payments related to some of our oncology collaboration. So that was another piece of it. And then there was the licensing IP revenues as well. That's another piece of it. So those were the three key factors that you would say, a drop off in terms of the GEL revenues and an offsetting and increase in terms of the milestone payments and the licensing revenues. Now, in terms of philosophy, the philosophy has not changed. Our philosophy, fairly consistently over the years, has been that over a multi-year period, you should expect leverage from our business. And that continues to be true. Having said that, at any given time, we look at what the best uses of our capital is. And since we're in the midst for example of an innovation cycle, you'll see us spend more against those priorities and you've seen that play out with NovaSeq, you saw that play out before with the HiSeq X and NextSeq and so where we feel there is an opportunity to expand the market to significantly improve the size of the market because of the elasticity, increase our competitive position, we will spend to do that. For example, you saw what we’re doing with PacBio, that's a good example of a complementary set of technologies that we think our customers would value. But over a multi-year period, we do believe that there is operating leverage in the business. It's also good. And I guess it's appropriate that we're doing this call on DNA day today, celebrating the 66th anniversary of the publication of the structure of the DNA molecule. And as we -- and 16 years, I guess, since we published the human genome, as we reflect back on all the progress of the 66 years, it truly is remarkable how much has been achieved. But it's truly astounding how much is still in front of us. Less than 0.01% of all species have ever been sequenced, even once, less than 0.02% of people have ever been sequenced. And so there's still this tremendous opportunity in front of us. And so we want to make sure that we continue to deliver the innovations that allow us to capture that market.

And our next question comes from Mark Massaro with Canaccord Genuity.

So the beat relative to our model in the quarter was driven by services in other in particular, in microarrays. But, you certainly are taking a more cautious stance on arrays. So I guess my first question is, with the record number of DTC samples, but lower revenue than expected, can you just speak to the pricing dynamic? And if you expect pricing, maybe to get worse from here. And then, Francis, I guess, there's a lot left to be desired to explain why there's been sort of a dislocation in DTC. So what gives you confidence that this transition will impact return to growth say in 2020.

So let me start with the first part of that, Mark, and thanks for the question. The beat was actually on a couple of fronts. So let me punctuate sort of the quarter. Sequencing consumables in Q1 came in better than expected. So that was a part of the beat, that was a large part of the beat. Sequencing and other revenues also came in stronger than expected. And I mentioned a couple of factors there. One was related to some licensing IP revenues that came in, that was more timing driven. The other one was driven by some GEL set samples still being sequenced, albeit less than what we had in 2018. But still they have not gone down to zero. And actually, we saw some other microarray strength as well in the quarter. This is outside of DTC, but other microarray coming in better than expected. Now, on the other side, in terms of on the negative side, as we mentioned on the call, sequencing instruments were slightly lower than expected, and that was driven by mostly the handful of NovaSeq shipments that got pushed out as well as DTC revenues coming in lower than expected. So as Francis mentioned, yes, we did have record DTC samples processed in the quarter, as you would expect in Q1 that’s usually a very strong quarter in Q1, because you have all of the samples and all of the kicks that get returned to us and get sampled and processed. But it was still weaker than we expected, given that it's Q1 and given that Q1 is the largest quarter. So there isn't really much of a pricing dynamic playing here, it was just again, our expectations were the Q1 would be X and it came in slightly lower. And hence, we're taking an even more cautious view for the year on DTC.

And then in terms of the look forward, we've earned into a really fortunate position where we work very closely with the pioneers that have created effectively the consumer DTC space, right. So it is the 23andmes and the ancestries and the other players that are really pioneering this category. And we spend, as you can imagine time with them, and we work very closely with them to understand the dynamics of the market as they're evolving, and we've done that, frankly, since those companies effectively got into DNA testing. And so, we have their information around how the markets evolving, and they were the ones who called it to say, look, the market is moving from a genealogy market to a healthcare market. They were expecting the slowdown as it played out and split up maybe a little bit more of a slowdown than expected, but frankly the direction is what they said. They also are sharing the data with us on why they believe, and what they're seeing in terms of updates of health offerings, and why they believe that's an exciting market going forward. And so, part of our planning is to work with them on their forecasts. In addition, we're seeing demand from outside the US DTC customers and so even, there's this data that in terms of real customers were signing up, we've talked about well over 100 customers now, outside the US in the DTC space, and they're going to continue to grow and at some point, they will be big enough to be a material driver of the overall growth in that space, and it makes intuitive sense, right. There's no reason why consumer genomics is a purely American phenomena and why people in the UK or China or Japan or Australia won't also care about the same things that people care about here. And so we're seeing that data. And intuitively it makes sense that the same phenomenon that played out here will start to play out outside the US.

Thank you. And our final question comes from Jack Meehan with Barclays.

Thank you. Francis, I was hoping you'd give us an update on the PacBio side. We’ve seen the headlines related to the UK CMA, just how do you think the deal is progressing on the regulatory front? Do you think you can resolve the concerns and what's feedback been around market sizing and competition? Thanks.

Yes, sure. So we are, as you know, engaged with both the CMA and the SEC here in the US and that process is going as expected. In the US, we've gone into the second request starting at the beginning of the year. And in the UK, we have completed our filing. And as expected, the CMA is going into its investigative phase. That is standard. I know it got covered by the press as though, sort of an unexpected investigation. That is a standard part of the process. And so, from our perspective, we are very comfortable with where we are in the process. We are where we expected to be, and we expect to close in the middle of the summer.

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes our question-and-answer session for today's call. I would now like to turn the call back over to Jacquie Ross for any further remarks.

Thank you. As a reminder, a replay of this call will be available at the Webcasts in the Investors section of our website, as well as the dial-in instructions contained in today's earnings release. Thank you for joining us today. This concludes our call and we look forward to our next update following the close of the second fiscal quarter.

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for participating in today's conference. This does conclude today's program and you may all disconnect. Everyone, have a wonderful day.