Good afternoon and welcome to indie Semiconductor’s Fourth Quarter and Year End 2023 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded. I will now turn the call over to Ashish Gupta, Investor Relations. Mr. Gupta, please go ahead.

Thank you, operator. Good afternoon and welcome to indie Semiconductor’s fourth quarter and year end 2023 earnings call. Joining me today are Don McClymont, indie’s Co-Founder and CEO; and Tom Schiller, indie’s CFO and EVP of Strategy. Don will provide opening remarks and discuss business highlights, followed by Tom’s review of Q4 and indie’s outlook. Please note that we’ll be making forward-looking statements based on current expectations and assumptions, which are subject to risks and uncertainties. These statements reflect our views only as of today and should not be relied upon as representative of our views as of any subsequent date. These statements are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from expectations. For material risks and other important factors that could affect our financial results, please review our Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, as well as other public reports with the SEC. Finally, the results and guidance discussed today are based on non-GAAP financial measures such as non-GAAP gross margin, non-GAAP operating income loss, non-GAAP net income loss and non-GAAP EBITDA. These metrics may exclude corresponding GAAP measures certain of the following items, depreciation and amortization, share-based compensation, acquisition-related expenses, inventory cost realignments, gain or loss from change in fair values, non-cash interest expense, and income tax, benefits or expenses. For a complete reconciliation to GAAP and the definition for the above items, please see our Q4 earnings press release, which was issued in advance of this call and can be found on our website at www.indiesemi.com. I’ll now turn the call over to Donald.

Thank you, Ashish, and welcome, everybody. The indie team delivered another quarter of solid revenue and gross margin performance, capping off a third consecutive year in which we’ve more than doubled our top-line. Once again, massively outpacing our peer group and earning the unique distinction of being the fastest-growing semiconductor company in the world based on our last 2 years of revenue performance, per Morgan Stanley. Despite the challenging macro backdrop, in Q4, we achieved record revenue delivering sales growth of 112% year-over-year and 16% sequentially to just over $70 million, with 50 basis points of gross margin expansion on a year-over-year basis to 52.7%. We also substantially narrowed our operating loss to less than $1 million on an EBITDA basis. While we navigate automotive industry weakness in the short-term, stemming from rising interest rates, slowing in-market car sales, decelerating consumer transition to semiconductor content-rich electric vehicles, and inventory rebalancing across the automotive industry, our design win momentum has continued unabated and reinforces our confidence in indie’s business model. I’m proud of the indie team’s absolute relentlessness and the substantial progress we’ve made to date towards our financial goals in the face of these headwinds. Entering 2024, we expect these dynamics to persist, dampening Q1, but with a recovery in Q2 and a return to strong growth by Q3 and Q4 of this year. As context, automotive markets are forecasted to slow after experiencing a strong 2023. According to an updated S&P Global Assessment from last month, in 2022, light vehicle production totaled 83 million units, up 7% year-over-year, while 2023 was up 9% to 90 million vehicles, but S&P Global is now indicating the first signs of the market shrinking in this production year. In particular, we are seeing real-time weakness across the China e-vehicle market as their luxury…

Thanks, Donald. Revenue for the fourth quarter was up 112% year-over-year and up 16% sequentially to a record $70.1 million at the lower end of our guidance band and indicative of the weak market environment, though still up more than tenfold within just 3 years. Q4 gross profit was $37 million, translating into a 52.7% gross margin, up 50 basis points year-over-year and consistent with our guidance. Operating expenses were $39.4 million, with R&D sequentially lower to $29.4 million, reflecting a pause and tapeout activity, while SG&A was down slightly quarter-over-quarter to $10 million. In turn, our Q4 operating loss narrowed to $2.4 million versus a loss of $15.1 million in the year-ago period, driven by higher revenue, improving gross margin, and operating expense leverage. Adding back $1.4 million of depreciation, our EBITDA loss was less than $1 million. With net interest expense of $200,000, our net loss was $2.6 million, and we posted a $0.01 loss per share on a base of 181.6 million shares, again, in-line with our guidance and consensus estimates. We exited the quarter with $151.7 million of cash and equivalents, down $9 million versus Q3, primarily related to increased AR and CapEx to expand our internal test capacity, partially offset by a decline in inventory. Turning to our outlook. For the first quarter of 2024, we expect indie’s revenue to be up 38% year-over-year, but down 20% sequentially, reflecting seasonality and current industry softness, with gross margin in the 52% range. In terms of operating expenses, we are planning for $34 million in R&D, driven by accelerated product development activities, and $10 million of SG&A. Below the line, we anticipate $400,000 of net interest expense and no taxes. Assuming 186 million shares outstanding, including the full 7.7 million shares related to the retirement of 27 million warrants that we closed in November, we expect an $0.08 net loss per share. From a full-year 2024 perspective, we expect revenue to be in the $275 million to $300 million range, up 29% at the midpoint. Based on our new program and design-win pipeline, we expect Q1 to represent a trough quarter, a top-line recovery in Q2, and a resumption of outsized revenue growth in Q3 and Q4, yielding a profitability baseline on an EBITDA basis in the second half of this year, ahead of our significant 2025 radar and vision ramps. On that note, I’ll turn the call back to Donald for his closing comments.

Thanks, Tom. In conclusion, we posted record Q4 and 2023 results, demonstrating the strength of our business model through a challenging operating environment. Whilst we can’t control the weather, our strategic focus remains unwavering. We’re building an absolute Autotech powerhouse with innovative ADAS, user experience, and electric vehicle solutions, positioning us to effectively navigate current market conditions, capitalize on the $48 billion serviceable opportunity, which is just ahead of us and, most importantly, to create great shareholder value. That concludes our prepared remarks. Operator, let’s open the call for questions.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our first question is from Suji Desilva with ROTH MKM. Please go ahead.

Hi, Donald. Hi, Tom. So, maybe you could provide some color on the demand weakness you’re seeing, if that’s broadly across all geographies, or whether there’s any geography color there and any specific color on sort of the programs or applications that maybe are being impacted EV, non-EV, that kind of thought.

Well, we’re seeing that the overwhelming reason for the majority of it is just the inventory digestion, which is broadly across the market. We do see some specifics in the China EV vehicle market, which are kind of the vanguard of what we saw coming across the market. But generally speaking, it’s really a broad inventory correction that we’re seeing.

Okay. And then, to understand the follow-up on that, you talked about a program push-out, I believe, or a cancel coming to the next program. Can you just kind of clarify that and talk about whether you’re seeing kind of a broader trend of decisions and programs for maybe the model years, ‘25, ‘26, ‘27, being delayed or pushed out, or whether those decisions are continuing to be made ahead of those model ramps?

No. To answer the last part of your question first, absolutely not. This is one program out of 50 that we’re working on. And it just happened to be a program where there was an ambitious goal set for it, and engineering execution on the customer side didn’t pan out for their business goals. So, it was a major program for them. In this case, I would say, it’s something that very rarely happens in the automotive industry at all. And even with us, with a relatively smaller customer base, it’s still an extremely rare thing. So, it’s for sure not a trend.

Okay, thanks, Donald.

Thank you. Our next question is from Craig Ellis with B. Riley Securities. Please go ahead.

Hi. This is Ethan Widell calling in for Craig Ellis. Thanks for taking my questions. You provided a nice view on the slope of demand as you see it. And I was wondering if you could provide any color on how you are seeing the gross margin trajectory going forward.

Yes. So, we expect gross margin expansion from here. In fact, this is just an air pocket in terms of market demand. But as you have seen in the past, we have done a very good job sequentially expanding margin, and that just comes from improving mix and lowering costs, improving yields, etcetera, and that’s going to continue. So, we expect off the Q1 trough to begin to expand gross margin again towards 60%.

Got it. And similarly, are you thinking about any OpEx levers, or would that similarly be something that we could expect to see grow out of second quarter?

OpEx at this stage, we have reached critical mass. So, we are making tactical investments here and there to accelerate product development. That’s happening in the current quarter. But from there, it’s a relatively flattish profile, and that creates the operating leverage to hit profitability in the back half of this year and then of course, beyond that towards our 30% target model.

Got it. That’s much appreciated. Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question is from the line of Anthony Stoss with Craig-Hallum Capital Group. Please go ahead.

Hey guys. Maybe if you can give us some color on kind of expecting new programs coming in line Q2, Q3, Q4, that gives you the confidence for kind of a steep ramp in Q3 and Q4. And also, as my follow-up, probably for you, Donald, again, I think the large radar win, your prior statements were Q4 or Q1 of 2025, now you are saying 2025, do you still expect it to be in Q1 2025, or is that getting pushed as well?

No, that still remains on track. I mean that’s perhaps that the semantics of the notes that we made in the prepared remarks, so nothing has changed in that respect. In fact, we did announce that we had sampled these programs. And as you know, from all of your experience in this market, the back of the program is largely broken once you get to first silicon, and the rest of it is really execution of maybe more of the details of ramping into production. So, we are pretty happy where that program is right now, and we do expect some material revenue from that to come on the schedule that we originally outlined. In terms of what we are ramping, we are ramping across the board. There are vision programs that are ramping. There are user experience programs that are ramping throughout this year, not radar, of course, that will be late this year, and early next year. But, yes, I mean it’s still fundamentally across the board in all of the other project areas that we are servicing right now.

Thanks guys.

Thank you. Our next question is from Cody Acree with The Benchmark Company. Please go ahead.

Yes. Thanks guys for taking my questions. I guess given the magnitude of the decline in Q1, what is giving you confidence that you are going to see a ramp to support your fiscal year outlook? I guess what are you expecting sequentially as you push through the year?

I mean we have programs ramping through the year, of course, which has been typical of us through our entire public existence. And as I just mentioned in an answer to the previous question, for sure, we do expect the market to recover. And I think you will see that message coming from multiple companies in the same space as us that they are seeing through that period of recovery. I mean in particular areas in the market, we did see what I would describe as fairly dramatic air pockets. We have tried to be conservative in the way that we have guided Q1. And as a net result, we are pretty confident about a recovery in Q2 and a return to the plan in Q3, Q4.

And I guess, Donald, is that confidence backed by firm orders today? And I guess what’s the flexibility or cancelability of those orders? I guess how much volatility are you building into your Q2 expectations?

Well, like I say, we have tried to build in as much conservatism as we possibly can. I mean this has been a fairly – in certain segments, a fairly violent disturbance in the market. But we do expect that with the recovery that we are seeing, coupled with the conservatism that we have built in, we feel pretty confident about where we can get to in the second half and in Q2 indeed.

Alright. Thank you, guys.

Thank you. Our next question is from the line of Jon Tanwanteng with CJS Securities. Please go ahead.

Hi. This is Justin on for Jon. Thanks for taking the question. First, how does the updated outlook impact your expectations for cash flow and your capital needs?

Well, between now and what Donald just outlined in terms of the back half of the year, cash flow probably will resemble our operating loss. So, you can assume somewhere in the $35 million to $40 million range of cash usage between now and then until we are beginning to generate cash that is. And of course, we just exited with north of $150 million in cash, so that leaves us with ample cushion.

Okay. That’s helpful. I appreciate the color. And then if I could, one more. Can you talk about the scale of the wins that you have in Q4 and try to size them for us if any of them are significant?

Well, the one that we would single out is the design win for Ficosa who are a European-based Tier 1 and as such supply with this particular program, two of the largest European OEMs. It’s a program that we have been working on for quite some time. And I wouldn’t say it is the largest program that we have won in the history of the company, but certainly in the top five.

Okay. Thanks a lot. I appreciate the question.

Thanks.

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, as there are no further questions, that concludes the conference of indie Semiconductor. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect your lines.