Good day, and welcome to the Insmed First Quarter 2020 Financial Results Conference Call. All participants will be in a listen-only mode. [Operator Instructions] After today’s presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. Please note, this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Sara Bonstein, Chief Financial Officer. Please go ahead

Thank you, Jason. Good morning, and welcome to today’s conference call to discuss our first quarter 2020 financial results and provide a business update. Before we start, let me remind you that today’s call will include forward-looking statements based on current expectations. Such statements represent our judgment as of today and may involve risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. Please refer to our filings with the SEC, which are available through the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov or from our website, for information concerning the risk factors that could affect the Company. We plan to reference a non-GAAP financial measure during today’s call. For a reconciliation of that measure to our GAAP results, please refer to the earnings release we issued earlier today. Additionally, the information on today’s call is not intended for promotional purposes and not sufficient for prescribing decisions. Joining me on today’s call are members of the Insmed executive management team, including Will Lewis, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; Roger Adsett, Chief Operating Officer; and Dr. Martina Flammer, Chief Medical Officer. Let me now turn the call over to Will Lewis for prepared remarks. Upon completion of those remarks, we will open the call up for your questions. Will?

Thank you, Sara. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us. We hope you and your families are safe and healthy during these challenging times. The first quarter of 2020 will be remembered as one of the most trying in history and by the unexpected personal and business disruptions brought on by this global pandemic. For those of us at Insmed, the challenges posed by COVID-19 shine a bright light on the critical needs of patients living with serious and underserved diseases. We remain as committed as ever to our mission of serving these patients, as well as the healthcare providers who care for them. We are pursuing this mission from a position of strength. And our solid balance sheet will enable us to stay the course with several meaningful inflection points along the way. I’ll turn first to INS1007, which we’re now calling by its new name, brensocatib. Notably, last week, we announced the start of an investigator initiated study of brensocatib in hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19. The results we observed from our Phase 2 WILLOW study in patients with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis give us hope that the novel mechanism of action of brensocatib will have an impact on patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome or ARDS, a devastating outcome of COVID-19 for which there are no currently approved therapies. We are proud to be a part of the innovative efforts in the fight against this pandemic. Martina will go into greater detail about this study and share new data from the WILLOW study on today’s call. We originally in-licensed brensocatib from AstraZeneca to explore its potential in patients with bronchiectasis. On the heels of the successful Phase 2 WILLOW study, we are continuing to advance brensocatib into Phase 3 development and expect to begin this program…

Thanks, Will, and good morning, everyone. As Will mentioned, we believe brensocatib represents the opportunity to build the pipeline around the product. Let me remind you that brensocatib is a novel oral reversible inhibitor of dipeptidyl peptidase 1 or DPP1. DPP1 is an enzyme that catalyzes the activation of neutrophil serine proteases or NSP, key agents of neutrophil-mediated inflammation. Last week, we announced the initiation of the superiority trial of protease inhibition in COVID-19 or STOP-COVID-19, an investigator initiated study of brensocatib in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. The rationale for this study, which is being conducted by Professor James Chalmers, at the University of Dundee is that the patients with severe COVID-19, neutrophil influx into the lungs is a defining characteristic of acute respiratory distress syndrome or ARDS. As Will mentioned, ARDS is a severe outcome of COVID-19 that is associated with high mortality. It is believed that the reduction of neutrophil proteases in these patients may reduce the progression of lung injury and the need for mechanical ventilation. The STOP-COVID-19 trial is a multicenter, prospective, randomized study expected to enroll up to 300 patients with confirmed COVID-19 who present to the hospital at risk of needing increased levels of supplemental oxygen and/or ventilation. Patients will be randomized to receive either a 25-milligram dose of brensocatib once daily, or matching placebo, on top of standard of care. The primary endpoint is clinical improvement on a seven-point ordinal scale as defined by the World Health Organization. Patients will be treated for up to 28 days with a sample-size reassessment performed once 100 patients have been enrolled and treated. While the timing of the study is enrollment-dependent, we look forward to the sample-size reassessment sometime in the third quarter of this year with final data expected by the end of the year…

Thanks, Martina, and good morning, everyone. I’m pleased to report that from an operational perspective, we continue to execute on our strategy, delivering across all areas of our organization, including research and development, manufacturing and international expansion. While we have adjusted our approach significantly, we continue to support our customers and patients and execute at a high level across medical affairs and commercial. As we previously shared, COVID-19 has had an impact on our U.S. commercial efforts related to ARIKAYCE. In mid-March, we pulled our sales force from the field to ensure the safety of our team, our patients and physicians and to respect the tremendous efforts of healthcare professionals were directing to the care of COVID-19 patients. Our first quarter sales were also impacted by the expected reset of deductibles, including the donut hole effect. Notwithstanding these obstacles, we announced early today, total net sales of $36.9 million for ARIKAYCE for the first quarter of 2020. I’m extremely proud of the commercial team’s ability to deliver this result in the face of significant challenges we face. To dig a bit deeper, we are seeing regional variability around the response to COVID-19 and the impact it is having on ARIKAYCE, but no clear trends have emerged. In light of the necessary adaptation of our sales force to a remote model, we expect new patient adds to be modest in the near-term. That said, while these are challenging times, we remain confident in the long-term strength of the ARIKAYCE franchise and are hopeful that we can continue to grow in the second half of this year, assuming the COVID-19 situation continues to improve. In the meantime, our teams are continuing to support customers through virtual engagements. And we’re encouraged that physicians are continuing to start new patients. Additionally, in recent survey…

In the first quarter of 2020, we made significant progress across all of our programs, maintaining a keen focus on the management of our operating expense. As Will mentioned at the start of the call, Insmed is well-positioned to support the next wave of its growth through multiple value inflection points. In the current climate, operating expenses are as difficult to predict as revenues. For the first quarter, our operating expenses were well below budget. While we continue to face uncertainties brought on by COVID-19, we can say that our cash runway coupled with our focus on appropriate spend leaves us confident that our financial resources could carry us into 2022. Our quarterly results are detailed in our press release issued this morning. For today’s call, I want to draw your attention to a few key line items. This morning, we reported total net revenue for the first quarter of $36.9 million, comprising $35.2 million in U.S. net sales of ARIKAYCE, and $1.7 million ex-U.S. net sales of ARIKAYCE. The ex-U.S. net sales reflect utilization from the compassionate use named patient programs in both, France and Germany. Total net revenue increased 68% as compared to the first quarter of 2019. Our gross to net for the first quarter were approximately 14%, similar to what we saw in the first quarter of 2019. While we anticipated our gross to net in Q1 to be higher due primarily to the coverage gap as a result of the benefit reset at the beginning of the year, we reiterate our previous guidance of our gross to net for the full year to be in the mid-teens. Cost of product revenues for the quarter was $8.4 million and gross margin was approximately 77%. As a reminder, our gross margin in 2019, which was 81%, benefited…

Thank you, Sara. Let me close out our prepared remarks by reiterating that we are extremely proud of the continued execution by the team at Insmed. We believe we are advancing a pipeline of high-value opportunities in areas of stark unmet medical need. In tandem, we believe our commercial efforts for ARIKAYCE have enabled us to create a strong franchise with great future potential globally and across additional indications. I want to congratulate the Insmed team for staying the course and making tremendous progress in these uncertain times. We all remain very excited about what lies ahead for the Company. With that, I’d like to open the call to questions. Operator, can we take the first question, please?

[Operator Instructions] The first question comes from Matthew Harrison from Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead.

Hi, all. Thanks for taking the question. This is Connor Meehan on for Matthew. So, just a couple from us. How has the physician and patient engagement trend during COVID? I know you guys mentioned the digital sales force. And I guess, we are just looking for maybe some more color on that. And then, could you provide some guidance on how new diagnoses for NTM have fallen off, if they have?

I appreciate the question. I’m actually going to turn this one over to Roger to sort of address from the commercial point of view.

Thanks, Will. Yes. So, I think that we’ve had tremendous engagement from physicians and healthcare professionals, the office staff in a very -- very trying circumstance. So, we have the digital engagement from our sales team, we have the virtual training from our Arikares Trainers, we have engagement from our Arikares Coordinators. Now, I would say, there’s regional variation with some areas of the country have been hit a lot harder than other areas. And that’s made obviously the priority of physicians to focus on COVID-19 rather than on NTM patients. But, I would say that the biggest challenge we’re seeing right now is just the patients -- we did some survey work that I mentioned in the prepared remarks, just some survey work. And, I think what physicians are telling us is, the biggest challenges they’re seeing is just the number of patients who aren’t comfortable coming into the office yet. We’re certainly seeing a rise in telemedicine, but that hasn’t offset the volume of patient visits that you would expect in a normal situation. Having said that, he also mentioned that the physicians have moved to managing patients and making sure that they stick with their therapy and continue on their therapy for the patients who are already on ARIKAYCE. So, it really turned their attention away from the new patients because the opportunity is not there right now as robustly as it was previously, but they’re focused on making sure that the patients already on therapy continue. And as we mentioned, there’s an increase in index of suspicion that they reported with over half of the patient -- physicians reporting an increase in that index of suspicion with an intention to do more screening, once these patients return. And also about two-thirds of these physicians report with pulling the NTM patients in with some urgency, so proactively asking them to come in for screening and to manage their NTM rather than waiting for them to make appointments. So, I think all of those trends are very encouraging. I think, what we’ll see is this is just a delay. We’re pushing out these diagnoses. And certainly we could expect if the -- based on those survey results, we may see -- in the second half of the year, we may see a bolus of these NTM patients coming in for therapy.

And I would just add to that. I think, one of the interesting and unintended features, of course, of the global pandemic is, this increased attention to respiratory condition, generally. So, I think, we will be the beneficiary of that, as it goes forward. Now is actually the time to be a company with products that are focused and developmental products, candidates that are focused on pulmonary health.

The next question comes from Adam Walsh from Stifel.

My first one is, you mentioned the donut hole in the first quarter of 2020. Do you feel that that’s behind you now in terms of the impact on the ARIKAYCE in the first quarter?

Yes. The short answer to that is, yes. I think, it was behind us much earlier in the year. And in fact, we pretty much put it in the rearview mirror. And then, we got hit with COVID. So, it was an interesting first quarter, as you’ve seen. The good news is, I think, the team responded very well to that. And I would just say structurally, the donut hole is something you’re going to encounter every year. I think, we move through it pretty quickly. It doesn’t speak to fundamental demand or interest in writing a prescription. It speaks to the delay of the initiation of therapy. I don’t know, Roger, if you’d add anything to that?

I would agree with that, Will. I think we’re well past that and we’re working our way through -- we’re working our way through that. And as you mentioned, this just slows down the processing while the patient lines up assistance to meet those co-pays. And we think we’re on the other side of that now.

That’s helpful. And then, a couple of quick ones here. For Sara, you mentioned supporting the STOP-COVID-19 trial. What does that mean in terms of increased cost outlay or spend? And then, one final one on 1007. You mentioned kind of numerical trends for periodontal disease with that. I’m just curious kind of what are the thresholds of periodontal disease that might cause concern?

Yes. So, I’ll let Sara answer the first one on the costs related to COVID-19.

Yes. Thanks, Adam. I appreciate the question. Immaterial for providing for drug and some nominal costs but immaterial from a total cash operating expense impact.

Yes. And then, on the issue of periodontal disease, I just want to be clear. The reason we look at this is because if you look at patients who have Papillon-Lefèvre syndrome, which is a total absence of DPP1. They tend to have increased levels of periodontal disease. So, we included periodontal disease as a rate -- as one of the adverse events of special interest. And we tracked it very closely. That meant that we had a dentist literally inspecting each patient throughout the course of the study. And as you may recall from the top line data we released, if you look at the different percentage, rates of so called periodontal disease in placebo is 2.4%; at the 10-milligram arm, it was 7.4%; and in the 25-milligram arm, it was 10.1%. None of this led to discontinuation of the drug, but it was something we were tracking. And the characterization of periodontal disease was a minimal change in the rescission level of the gum, if I remember it correctly. And the consequence of that was not considered to be meaningful. I don’t know, Martina , if you want to add any characterization to that particular item and how we’re going to think about that going forward?

Yes. Will, that’s correct. So, we measure truly if there is a change in the gum pocket and has it also independently assessed. And based on what we’ve seen in Phase 2, we don’t right now anticipate that we will have this type of dental monitoring in Phase 3. We will discuss this with the agency. But, that is what we -- what’s the current assessment, based on the data.

And I think, just final point of encouragement there is that our DPP-1 inhibitor in contrast to others that were developed is reversible. And we demonstrated this very clearly in the Phase 2 study. So that even if we were to get to a place where somehow this was viewed as something to be watched carefully, it’s something we can always accommodate by discontinuing the drug and seeing the reversibility and the return of DPP-1.

Thanks.

The next question comes from Martin Auster from Credit Suisse. Please go ahead.

Hey, all. Thanks for taking the question. I had a couple of pipeline questions this morning. I guess, first, Roger, you’re talking about the PRO study and the validation of the PRO kind of being conducted in parallel with the confirmatory study. I was curious if that validation is likely to then be released ahead of the confirmatory readout. And obviously, the timelines are a little bit in flux right now. But, assuming you start that trial later this year, would that validation readout -- how far in advance of the final data would that occur and would that allow you to kind of I guess resize the trial or modify the PRO? And the second question I had was on treprostinil palmitil. Curious what you guys are thinking about in terms of defining success of the Phase 1 trial. Are you looking to show kind of comparability to the currently marketed form of treprostinil? So, how do you define that through positive PK measures? Are there other measures you are thinking about? And then, what if successful, Phase 1 allow you to advance right to registrational study in PAH as well as any other approved indications for [indiscernible].

The first thing I would say on the frontline study, there are two components to that. One is, the actual study that will secure approval for the indication of frontline use of ARIKAYCE in MAC patients. That study will run for 13 months in length. It will use the PRO as the primary endpoint. In parallel, we’ll be running what I call the sentinel [ph] study, which is effectively a way to address the uncertainties that surround the use of a previously unused PRO, which we’ve seen in other areas of biotech development. So, this was a response to that. And the way we do this is by validating the PRO in a parallel study. That study -- the validation study will run for 7 months. So, the consequence of that is, we will know the information on the PRO validation study, if these are running at the same enrollment rates, et cetera, a half year before we would have the results of the main study. And yes, indeed, the intent is that if we learn things from that study, we can utilize them to adjust the main study, which will still be blinded. So, that’s a really important point about that sentinel study, validate the PRO, we’ll see how it responds in this population. And as and when necessary, we can either adjust enrollment or even indeed the composition of how we think about the PRO prior to the unblinding of the main study. So, that study will release that information, the sentinel study earlier than the main study. And that should give investors in the market generally an understanding of how that PRO is responding. So, we’re super excited about that. We remain in a good place with regard to the FDA and their acceptance of this approach.…

Got it. Thanks Will.

The next question comes from Ritu Baral from Cowen. Please go ahead.

Good morning, guys. Thanks for taking the questions. Can you talk a little bit about what you’re seeing in Q2 as far as ARIKAYCE? How much comfort do you have on the visibility into the current ongoing quarter, based on Q1? Are those geographic impacts that you’re seeing continuing? And as you think about those new patient starts, given how, I guess, the clinical trial sites -- and clinical sites in general are thinking about reopening or thinking about changing how they see patients, do you see new patients starts changing in -- or an inflection in second quarter or is it necessarily the second half?

Yes. So, it’s a great question. And it’s sort of at the heart of what we think about every day. I’ll turn over to Roger in a second to add his perspective. But, I would just characterize COVID-19 as creating a great deal of uncertainty in the marketplaces as we’re all aware. And I think, geographically, variability is the watchword for what we’ve experienced. I will say though, notwithstanding all of that -- and I have to call this out, the commercial team as a whole have done an exceptional job of making it possible for patients to initiate drug, to continue drug and to get and to see the benefit of this therapy. We have seen new patient starts in the most challenged locations like New York City. So, I think that is a remarkable outcome in the midst of what is obviously a very distracting circumstance. Roger, you’re much closer to this than I am. What might you add to that?

Yes. Thanks, Will. I would only add that as we mentioned, I think the most challenging aspect that physicians are talking and telling us is just that patients are postponing or canceling their visits. And there’s some -- and so, it’s -- as states reopen and as they make the decision on how they’re going to reenter into some semblance of normalcy, that -- those patient visits coming back is going to be a major driver. And as we mentioned, physicians are looking to call those patients in proactively. So, while I can’t pinpoint exactly when it’s going to happen and it will vary from state to state, depending on the impact of COVID and depending on how governors make the decisions to reopen businesses, and as patients become comfortable engaging with their physicians and in-person perspective, then we’ll see -- I believe we will see the rebound in adding new patients. But, as Will said, we continue to add new patients. And I think that’s very encouraging. We think that there will be a bolus, and as we describe it, in the second half of the year as these patients become more comfortable in going back into the physicians’ offices. In the meantime, I would also like to add my thanks to the commercial team for all the work that they’ve been doing. We’ve pivoted towards the digital interaction with physicians. We’re working on materials, so that physicians can have constructive and productive conversations with their patients over telemedicine. As we see the adoption of telemedicine, the physicians are reporting that they really adopted that in earnest, and patients are taking advantage of that. And so, the materials that we provide to the offices and to physicians to have constructive educational conversations with their patients, we're also repurposing, so that they can use those in a virtual setting as well. So, I think we're doing everything we can. So, as soon as we get back to some semblance of normalcy, we'll be seeing the acceleration and additional growth. And like I said, I think the opportunity remains intact. It is a very strong sort of a dynamic that's building in my mind. And as Will said, I think the impact and the focus on respiratory health, the damage that occurs to the lungs from even from patients who recover from COVID, or an asymptomatic, I think is also going to play out over time. And we'll see how that how that plays out. But certainly, physicians have reported to us that they're paying much more attention to the suspicion going up for NTM. And I think we're going to be there to help support physicians as they go through that journey with the patients.

Roger, just to clarify something that you said. You mentioned the states reopening. Based on your conversations with doctors, how much are they actually paying attention to that, given some of the aggressiveness of the timelines? Are they telling you that, yes, these are their patients, will pay attention to that and start coming in, or are we necessarily thinking about some sort of lag upon reopening before those patients feel comfortable coming in?

So, what they're telling us is that patients are canceling their appointments or postponing their appointments. So, I think it's going to be, as we talk to patient advocacy groups, it's certainly top of mind as we've got a patient population that is potentially more vulnerable to COVID-19. So, that's where I think is going to be a combination of telemedicine, as well as the in-person visits. But certainly for new diagnoses, it's easier to do this over in-person, but we have reports of physicians, who are able to make the diagnosis and are able to initiate new patients on ARIKAYCE using telemedicine. They figured out how to do this. So, I think it's going to be a combination of both. And ultimately, it's going to be when patients decide that they're ready to go back into the offices is going to be the controlling factor. Physicians are anxious, particularly in areas where they're not overwhelmed with COVID-19 and they are not being called into the hospital. Physicians are anxious to reopen and get their practices back on track. And certainly they're concerned with targets that we've talked to. They're concerned about the health of their NTM patients.

And just a quick follow-up question, more housekeeping than anything. In your 1007 Phase 3 study, what’s left to discuss with FDA? I mean, it sounds like you've cashed out the primary endpoints in all of the geographies. Do you have the final design in hand or is there an FDA left to have before you can start the Phase 3?

So, we're not going through the sort of back and forth with FDA, not for any reason other than just that -- there's nothing really there in detail to share at this time. I think, what we really want to do and what I've always practiced, I've always followed is, wait until we have the definitive answer from FDA where everything is resolved, and then we can come out and share with everyone the details. But the discussion of the Phase 3 study, our approach with this compound, I think, we are sitting on a mountain of very encouraging data. And we want to make sure that the Phase 3, as a as a principle of design, varies little from Phase 2, because we're studying the relevant endpoints in Phase 2 and just simply carrying that over to Phase 3. If you think about the history of drug development in bronchiectasis, the challenge has been that every company prior to us, to the best of my knowledge, has always had to change the primary endpoints they're focusing on in Phase 3 from their Phase 2 program. And their Phase 2 programs have always been very small. In our case, we had more than 250 patients studying the relevant primary endpoints that would be needed for approval in Phase 3. So, all we have to do is replicate Phase 2 to secure access and approval from FDA. And if we accomplish that, will be the first ever approved drug to treat a disease that has hundreds of thousands of patients in the U.S. And we'll be treating it with chronic approach with a once a day pill that had a dropout rate that was higher in placebo than in the treatment arms. I mean, I went over the periodontal disease. But, I just want to remind everybody, the rates of adverse event leading to discontinuation were 10.6% in placebo versus 7.4% in the 10-milligram arm, and 6.7% in the 25-milligram arm. So, we are sitting with a very attractive safety profile and great clinical data that we think is going to pave the way for approval. And we'll get those final details nailed and once they are, we'll share it with everyone.

Got it. Thanks for the details.

You bet.

The next question comes from Joe Schwartz from SVB Leerink. Please go ahead.

Great. Thanks so much. I was wondering if you could give us any sense of the order of magnitude reduction in new patient adds since the pandemic hit? It would be helpful for us to calibrate our models, if you could give us any insight into what you're seeing in terms of, for example, how many patients have started ARIKAYCE in the post-COVID world versus the pre-COVID world?

Yes. I appreciate that question, Joe. I think, as Roger said in his prepared remarks, and I'll turn it over to him in a second, it's really hard to discern any trends that we think are reliable enough to be able to use as predictors. And we don't really want to go into splitting it down to that level of detail. But Roger, I don't know if you have any color you can add with regard to this question?

Yes. Thanks, Will. So, I think what I would add to that is just the number of patients and the physicians who are recording the reduction of visits. So, about two thirds of the healthcare professionals say that they've been impacted by this with fewer NTM diagnoses. So, it's about a third report they're about the same, and two thirds say that fewer NTM diagnoses. And the primary reason for that is the patients postponing or they’re canceling the visits. And so, as I said, I think the return to accelerating our growth here is going to be dependent on patients getting back into the offices and physicians continuing to adapt to telemedicine.

And it's difficult, Joe, to give you more detail there, because I think the other thing to operating is that while we are beginning to see certain things in certain regions, that variability gets compounded by the fact that some physicians through their practice and their experience now are finding new ways to address their interactions. Right? So, think about the first early news came out about COVID-19 and everybody was in a reactionary mode, and they were focused exclusively on preparing the hospitals and shutting everything down. And now, I think enough time has gone by. People are going to find their way back to the new normal. And there will be variability across the region as to how that happens. But physicians know the patients with serious pulmonary conditions can't be postponed forever. One of the most remarkable statistics in the context of COVID-19, in my opinion, has been the drop in hospitalization rate for people with heart attack and stroke. Those things don't go away, and they are not optional for treatment. Nonetheless, the rate of treatment for those kinds of conditions has gone down. We would expect the same kind of response here in the sense that you can postpone for a little while but not forever. And I think physicians are very-focused, and we've heard their gratitude expressed to us for our helping them in new and appropriate ways to be mindful about how to look after their patients who have this disease. Remember, this is a group of patients who are refractory, they've been treated for a very long time unsuccessfully. They now need to be treated with something additional on the judgment of physicians. And so, whatever we can do to help them, they are trying to find the way to make that happen.

And then, how well do you think your commercial team is prepared to deal with the bolus in the second half, if we get that? And as we get a taste of some semblance of normalcy, at least in some regions of this country going forward, at least for a brief spell, how do you expect a manager of sales and marketing efforts and how does the geographic variability of the disruption you've seen so far, and what you expect to see when things open up, set up or correspond with how your sales force is set up geographically, and do you see any need to make any adjustments in any of it?

Yes. So, first thing I want to say before I turn it over to Roger to talk about what the sales force is doing right now is I would put this sales force in any on the street period. They have delivered time and time again. And I think what is remarkable about them, from my interaction with them is they remain deeply committed to helping these patients. And I would say, they are not at all shaken by the fact that they've had to step out of their normal routine. They're finding new ways to get ready to address this bolus. So, when it comes, if it does, as we expect, they will be ready. And Roger, do you want to talk a little bit more detail about what they've been doing and how you think about this?

Yes. Thanks, Will. I would agree with that. I think, what's been remarkable in my mind and as well watch the sales team and the Arikares Coordinators and the Trainers, it's just the adaptability and the willingness to engage and support physicians and patients and healthcare professionals through different means. Right? And so, it's been a real pleasure to watch. And I have no qualms at all, when we see this increase in patients, and if we do get to this bolus that the surveys is predicting, based on the physicians and the targets we talk to, I think we are well-positioned to handle that. We have our intact sales team. We have our PAL team, patient access leaders, who support the reimbursement process. I think, as I mentioned in the prepared remarks, payers have been remarkably supportive here. And that's very encouraging. And we expect to be able to continue to process and have access to -- for patients to have access to ARIKAYCE, with minimal disruption, based on attestation for physicians who prescribe. We're prepared to talk with and support the patients virtually. So, we had a very strong response to virtual interactions and training with our Arikares field trainers in onboarding patients, training them on how to use the device and what to expect from therapy. And that's something that we can continue. We can continue to offer. So, I think what's happened here is the ways that the marketing team and the sales team have pivoted to the new situation, has actually added new arrows to our quiver. And so, we've got new tools and we've got new ways to successfully support patients and healthcare professionals. And I think, that's going to serve us really well as we get on the other side of this and get some sense of normalcy in the second half of the year.

Thanks for all the color. Best wishes.

Thanks, Joe.

The next question comes from Liisa Bayko from JMP. Please go ahead.

Hi. Thanks for taking my questions. Do you have any sense on the sort of size of this group of warehouse patients? Is there any quantification you can give us or…

I don't know that there is at this point. I think, the way I would describe it is there are a number of vectors that are coming together here that are going to contribute to that. And I think they're both the immediate byproduct of delay in treatment of COVID-19 -- caused by COVID-19, plus potentially the arrival, as we talked about even prior to COVID-19 of these opportunities through the adverse event management paper, which could encourage physicians to take on the treatment of these patients because it gives them the tool to know how to make that experience successful, the arrival of the guidelines and the promise of that webinar that indicated that we were going to be included. Those are drivers that will contribute in addition to the raised awareness of respiratory health and the importance of that, particularly in this kind of a population that increased index of suspicion, plus all of the baseline patients who are not seeing physicians now, but are postponing and we expect to come back. All of those come together. I don't think we can quantify it. But it is possible certainly to qualitatively describe all of those coming together as we return to new normal. I don't know, Roger, if you'd anything to that?

Yes. I would agree with that. I mean, certainly we didn't quantify it in our survey work that we didn't ask the positions to quantify that. But certainly what we're seeing is a deferral right now. It's not an elimination of the prescription. I think when the patients come back into the offices and reengage with the physicians, you're going to see that prescribing accelerate. I would also say that the index of suspicion and the increased attention on respiratory disease is a positive outcome of this. I think, the physicians are looking at their patients and recognizing how vulnerable they are. And as much as they can treat the patients and get them into their lungs into as healthy state as possible, I think the better everybody's going to be and certainly for those patients. And so,, that's what they're reporting is that index of suspicion, their urgency to call the patients back into their offices, as soon as they can is what I think is very encouraging as we think about the science going forward.

Are patients able to initiate therapy kind of -- or are they doing this vis-à-vis telemedicine? Is that happening?

Is that happening? Yes. Roger, do you want to give any detail?

Yes. So, there's -- so, we're certainly seeing new patient starts. We have reports from physicians that they are able to make the decision to put patients on ARIKAYCE, if they were not responding adequately to the to the background therapy. So, they're refractory patients. As I mentioned, the payers are relaxing some of their criteria for reauthorizations and sputum testing. So, physicians are able to through an attestation process, get the reimbursement. And then, we're able to support those patients virtually through our Arikares field trainers, get them on-boarded through different means. We can either do a video -- a video chat with them and walk them through the device and what to expect from therapy or we talk with them over the phone with supplemental video support, from the website as to -- with instructions. So, we are able and continue to support the on-boarding of new patients throughout all of this.

And then, just I wanted to ask a little bit more about brensocatib and its potential role on ARDS. Will, can you maybe talk about sort of the delayed onset of action and yet how you still think there may be an opportunity and a window for it to work in ARDS, given that also has a relatively short window? I'm just curious how you think about that.

Yes. No, I appreciate the question, because it allows me to say once again, the proper pronunciation of this new word, which is brensocatib, what I introduced today.

I'm sorry.

No. That's okay. I got it wrong when I started out and I can't tell you how many times I practiced it. But, I'm going to actually ask Martina to address the thought process behind this question, which is, it takes a couple of weeks for full pharmacodynamic effect, yet in the context of COVID-19 severe patients, why we think this might be a particularly useful. I think, the one thing I would just say at the outset is, the principal investigator from our Phase 2 WILLOW study Professor Chalmers is in fact the one who is directing this study. So, his thorough understanding of the mechanism of action, I think is -- and his experience with the drug is what informed his enthusiasm to approach us to want to initiate this study. But maybe Martina, you can talk about the science a bit.

Yes, sure. So, Liisa in COVID-19, basically has a acute inflammatory process in the lung. And in the early stages, this is neutrophil-driven. Then, neutrophil proteases just by blocking the neutrophil elastase and proteases, we hope that we will impact to stop that lung damage and potentially also the progression to ARDS. In early stages, ARDS is characterized by heavy neutrophil influx into the lungs, and because there's a higher density of neutrophil, there maybe even an opportunity for 10 -- brensocatib to work faster. And yes, you're right. In WILLOW, we've seen that the earliest, even more statistically significant that by day 15, while the maximum effect is you see by week -- by the fourth week of treatment. ARDS can develop in various stages. What you've seen in this disease with COVID-19 is some patients they get the infection, they show fever -- show all the symptoms, then they do -- they kind of okay in between and then they start progressing and they come back and you see bilateral infiltrates in the lungs and all the inflammatory markers up. So, it is interesting to see different how different ARDS presents in different types of infections. So we believe that there is an opportunity for brensocatib to start working and then help patients not to progress and actually come out with a better outcome, so they don't have to necessarily go on to mechanical ventilation.

Okay. Thank you.

The next question comes from Graig Suvannavejh from Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.

Thank you very much. Congrats on a quarter, really nice quarter. Just maybe one question, just for modeling purposes. Obviously, the first quarter, the numbers were below budget I think, is what you mentioned. And then, as we're anticipating in the second half a number of new clinical trial starts, can you maybe perhaps give us a sense of, at least relative to what we were originally budgeting? How we should be thinking about the flow of quarterly OpEx throughout the balance of the year? So that's, I guess for you, Sara. And then, maybe two questions on the pipeline. One, I just wanted to get your latest thoughts on abscessus trial. I noticed that wasn't mentioned in the press release. And then secondly, just on the Phase 3 program and non-CFBE? Any sense of what the size of the program might look like? I know you had a fairly large Phase 2. And so, any thoughts on kind of how many patients you might need for an approval there, and how long the trials might be?

Sure. I'll start with the last question first. We don't have that number sort of locked down yet. I think, we want to talk more fully about the entirety of the Phase 3 program with FDA in more detail before we sort of lock into final trial design. If you look at historical precedence, certainly hundreds of patients, I think the prior trials may be a good proxy for what may be needed. Although our effect was more dramatic than what they had seen. So that that may mitigate that a little bit. The abscessus trial is certainly still on the agenda. That is not one we are trying to get started necessarily by the end of the year. But we'll see how that evolves. I think our primary objectives strategically are clearly to get the frontline study in MAC, the Phase 3 study in 1007 and the Phase 1 program in 1009, while we're expanding geographically and securing approval in Europe and Japan. So, that's a pretty full agenda. And I think, we certainly are interested in getting approval to treat abscessus, especially given the strength of the investigator initiated study and the data that showed such impressive results with our drug that was released at last year's American Thoracic Society. But we want to make sure we do everything in a high quality way. And so, it may be that abscessus needs to follow behind the initiation of those other two trials that are the strategic focus at the moment. OpEx, I'll turn over to Sara to talk about how we're thinking about that for the balance of the year.

Thanks, Graig. I appreciate the question. So, as we’ve mentioned in our prepared remarks, there are obviously a lot of uncertainties with COVID-19. And, we had previously pulled revenue and operating expenses at the same level of sort of uncertainties. And what we felt was a more important metric for yourself and the investment community is to think about modeling is really on our financial resources. And so, that's why we have communicated that we feel confident that we have financial resources that could carry us into 2022. In this current year, we do have the pivotal programs that we have adopted to start later this year to obviously see some increase in OpEx once those start. But we feel confident we have financial resources to carry us into 2022.

The next question comes from Josh Schimmer from Evercore ISI. Please go ahead.

I'm not sure if I missed, if you had given the number of new patient adds over the quarter. I think, that's something you've given in the past month. I’m not sure if you're comfortable giving it to us for first quarter. And also, given your -- the target age demographics for ARIKAYCE and their potential susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2. Both in terms of the idea that they may be at higher risk given age, but they may also be at lower risk given some of the active inflammatory process in the lungs that could confer some protection against the virus. So, have you seen any -- amongst your patients any impact directly from COVID-19 or not?

I'll just turn that over to Roger to talk about new patient starts and anything we've seen in terms of detail at the patient level experiencing the COVID-19 pandemic.

So, we're not sharing new patient starts at this point and we're trying to give more qualitative direction as to we think the new patients, certainly there's been a delay as patients are putting off of postponing their visits. But the second half is when we really anticipate that we'll see that some return to normalcy and physicians calling patients in to examine and to make sure that, they're prescribing appropriately. So, there's increased focus on NTM patients. And I think that, while we are obviously not privy to patients talking about or sharing their medical conditions, I think that the increased attention from the physicians as to what they report on their NTM patients, and they very much pivoted towards making sure the patients who are on ARIKAYCE. And they've already made that prescribing decision stay on ARIKAYCE. So, they're very concerned about maintaining their health and making sure that they continue to take their medication. I think, the urgency to call the patients in the raised index of suspicion that the physicians are reporting also reflects the concern that this patient population may be vulnerable. I think, if we contrast that to many of the conversations we had when we launched ARIKAYCE, back in the fourth quarter of 2018, physicians didn't call their patients into initiate. They waited till the regular appointments for the patients to show up and prescribe ARIKAYCE. So, this is a change in behavior. And I think it is a reaction to the concern and focus on respiratory health and particularly around NTM. And I think that there's a much greater sense of urgency is what they're reporting to us for these -- to take care of these patients. So, I would say that reflects more of a -- they think these patients are potentially vulnerable rather than protected.

I think it's an interesting proposition, Josh. And I think we -- scientifically, we've not looked at that, but I think it probably warrants some additional attention. And so, I would just -- we'll put a pin in that one and maybe get back to you. I think generally, on the new patient starts and the metrics we’ve got, philosophically, I’d just have to say, last year we spent prior to COVID-19, a lot of time putting on a lot of detail. With the intention of being transparent and trying to communicate in a way that would be helpful to people who are modeling and understanding what was going on with the launch. I think we did that as effectively as we could. I'm not sure that the additional detail actually helped not notwithstanding our incredibly strong performance. So, philosophically, I'm sort of in a place where I feel like the best thing for us to do is to just deliver the performance and have that stand as the information that's of greatest relevance.

Got it. Thanks so much.

You bet, Josh.

This concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Will Lewis for any closing remarks.

Just thank you to everyone for dialing in and bearing with us through the long Q&A. I certainly appreciate your interest in the Company. And we hope you all remain safe and healthy through this unusual time. Thanks, everyone.

The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.