Good afternoon, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to Inter & Co's first quarter earnings conference call. Today's speakers are Joao Vitor Menin, Inter's CEO; Alexandre Riccio, Senior Vice President of Retail Banking; and Santiago Stel, Senior Vice President of Finance and Risk. Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded, and a replay will be available at the company's IR website. [Operator Instructions] Throughout this conference call, we will be presenting non-IFRS financial information. These are important financial measures for the company, but are not financial measures as defined by IFRS. Reconciliations of the company's non-IFRS financial information to the IFRS financial information are available in Inter & Co earnings release and earnings presentation appendix. Today's discussion might include forward-looking statements, which are not guarantees of future performance. Please refer to the forward-looking statements disclosure in the company's earnings release and earnings presentation. Now I would like to yield the floor to Mr. Joao Vitor Menin, Sir, the floor is yours. João Vitor Nazareth Teixeira de Souza: Thank you, operator. Hello, everyone. Thanks for joining us for our First Q earnings release. As we generally do, I will start with a quick overview of our strategy to then pass it to [indiscernible] and [ Santi ] that to cover the rest of the presentation. I will then close with a final remark and open it for Q&A session. Jumping to Page 5. I will start with a quick update on this quarter performance and how this connects to our North Star, which is the 60/30/30 plan. I'm glad to say that we reached almost 32 million clients this quarter. This increase in number of clients came together with an increase in our activation rate. We reached 55%, an improvement of 86 bps just this quarter. On efficiency…

Thank you, Joao. Good afternoon, everyone, and thanks for joining us today. As Joao mentioned previously, from day 1, we have been disruptors in the banking industry, allowing us to gain market share in one of the largest banking markets in the world. Our focus on innovation has been instrumental to our success. The first quarter of this year was not different. We once again welcomed 1 million new active clients, bringing our total increment to 3.9 million in the last 12 months. This growth is on par with the previous 12-month period, however, with a 340 basis points higher activation rates. All of this while maintaining an extremely comfortable level of customer acquisition costs. This consistency in growth has put us in a very good position to compete in our industry. And each day, we see market share gains across the markets we participate. Moving to Page 11. We can see that the day-to-day banking remains the backbone of our financial Super App. Total TPV increased 42% in an year-over-year basis. This reflects the strong growth and adoption of our platform. This quarter, volumes from credit cards surpassed debit for the very first time. This shift contributed to a stable interchange revenue even when compared to the seasonally strong fourth quarter. When looking on a cohort basis, we observed an encouraging trend. Newer cohorts show a steady increase in spending, reflecting their growing engagement with our offerings. Simultaneously, older cohorts continue to demonstrate robust growth as they mature. Moving to Page 12, I'll talk about Intershop, insurance and investments, all of which had great performance this quarter. Starting with Intershop, we were able to resume GMV growth while increasing net take rate. We delivered a BRL 1 billion GMV in a quarter typically marked by seasonal contraction. On insurance,…

Thank you, [indiscernible], and hello, everyone. Thank you for attending our call. Starting on Page 17, we can see a strong performance on our credit book. After growing our loans several quarters at 5%, we are now at 4%, which is in line with first quarter seasonal trends, reflecting marginally lower [ grade ] demand as a result of holidays and carnival. On a yearly basis, our portfolio grew 28%, surpassing BRL 32 billion. Important to note is that we continue growing our loan multiple times more than the market, therefore [ gained ] significant market share across products and diluting our cost base. Moving to interest rates. On the top of the page, we can see an increase of 1.0% in the all-in loans rate during this quarter. This is the consequence of: one, continued growth in the high-margin portfolios; two, the repricing of the legacy payroll and real estate portfolios; and three, the higher than average inflation in the quarter. We go deeper into the full impact of rates on the NIM page later. Going deeper on growth by loan type, we remain committed on deploying capital on the most profitable manner [ possible ] and, therefore, increasing the highest yields and ROEs on our loan portfolio. Our best credit products, FGTS and Home Equity, had the highest growth levels in scale within our loan mix. In FGTS, this quarter alone we reached the highest underwriting volume on record, reaching approximately [ BRL 500 million ] in new loans at an average monthly rate of 1.8%. On credit cards, we continue with the approach of prioritizing credit limits to existing and strong performing clients, enabling us to increase by nearly 40% of this portfolio while improving asset quality trends. Finally, on real estate and payroll loans, we balanced…

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Mr. Tito Labarta from Goldman Sachs.

I have two questions, if I can. One, just good loan growth, asset quality held up despite some seasonality. Just thinking from here, I mean, how much of the pickup in NPLs do you think was related to seasonality and in terms of continuing to grow the loan book close to this 30% level? how comfortable are you in being able to continuing to do that? And then my second question, really just to clarify a little bit the decline in the capital ratio in the quarter. I see here that you paid a dividend, I guess, from the bank to the holding, but it looks like the reference equity fell even more than what the dividend was, [ mostly ] a dividend of $125 million, if I have it correctly. But just if you can clarify a little bit the decline in the reference equity in the quarter and how much of it was related just to the dividend payment?

Thank you for your questions. Santiago here. So on asset quality, we think it was mainly due to seasonality. We are operating at the delinquency levels, both in terms of NPL formation and cost of risk that we think that we will be operating throughout the year. We have some upside to potentially be operating below this level, but it will be around the [ SIP ] code. Keep in mind that we are increasing underwriting on certain unsecured lines that will put some pressure on those ratios. On the other hand, we are growing FGTS and home equity, which tend to compensate. We are solving for risk-adjusted NIM. We have said this in prior calls. That's what we [ hear ] the most about, which is what we get to take home in terms of paying the lease [ for the ] interest expense and cost of risk. And then in terms of capital, what we had was several factors playing. On the one hand, we had AOCI or the mark-to-market of the securities portfolio, which is positive in some quarters, negatives in others, in this quarter was negative by BRL 50 million. It goes directly to equity and it impacts the regulatory capital or the reference capital as the [ regulator ] deposit. We had dividends from the bank into the holding level, which will -- I will dive in a bit deeper -- now for approximately BRL 160 million. And we also had a capital contribution from the bank to the broker dealer in Brazil, theDTVM for BRL 140 million. That will be reversed once the Central Bank recognized the consolidated capital of that. So that BRL 140 million was temporary. We also see the OCI also as temporary because it has the oscillations of back and forth. And those 3 together explains the change in the reference capital. But the most important thing on capital that I would like to highlight is that we are solving for financial performance. And in that sense, we created an organizational structure, a corporate structure, which now has the interim [ core ] holding with the follow-on that we did at the beginning of the year. Together with the profits that we're increasingly creating, we do expect to have a bigger percentage of our excess capital up in the holding level. This is more efficient for the performance of the company. We will keep obviously a cushion of operating with a comfortable level of CET1 of the Brazil bank level, but the excess capital would be increasingly more based in the holding company.

Okay. No, that's pretty clear. Just a follow-up on the first question. So the 30-ish percent loan growth, you feel pretty comfortable that you'll continue to be able to grow at that pace?

Yes. We think it's going to be in the 30s. Obviously, the second half of the year is the most active one so that we will determine the final outcome. We saw that in the last year when we had an acceleration towards the end. The first quarter wasn't bad, 4%. It was higher than prior first quarters, but we will see as the year goes by.

The next question comes from Mr. Thiago Batista from UBS.

First of all, congrats Joao, Alexandre, Santiago for the results, very strong numbers. I have two questions also. The first one about the PIX financing. How much transformational can be the PIX Financing for Inter? Do you believe that this can really change the profitability or change the business of the bank? Or how big this can be? The second question about interest hedge strategy. So we are seeing interest rates increasing a lot in the last couple of months in Brazil. So how Inter is doing its hedge strategy? João Vitor Nazareth Teixeira de Souza: Joao Vitor speaking. I'm going to cover the PIX Financing part of the question, then Santi will cover the hedge. So we are very excited with the PIX Financing product. We have been saying for a while that we see the 2.0 consumer finance in Brazil starting to play out. And what do you mean by that? We see with the PIX Finance different from the [ what ] achieve [indiscernible] on the credit cards as a more active product, more interesting product for us to deploy our capital. We can manage better the interest. We can manage better the moment where we do the underwriting. We have less intermediaries on the process, such as the card companies, the acquired companies and so on. And we are -- we started about 1 year or so even less with PIX Financing. And so far, the delinquency is better than the credit cards and the economics are better than the credit cards. And we're still improving, we're still rolling out that offering for our clients as we always like to say at Inter when it comes to credit underwriting. We like to move forward but with caution, but we see as a big addressable market for PIX Finance. So very excited with what we have seen so far. And again, just to remind the market, we have 80% of penetration on PIX. So we will be able to play a very good role on that product going forward.

Santiago here. On the hedging side, what we started to do at the beginning of last year was to hedge the originations, not the stock, the originations of the loans that have more than 1 year operations. This was payroll, FGTS, home equity and traditional mortgages, and we have been doing that since. Now that the interest rates went up a lot, we pause. We will resume once we see the rates going down. So we are smoothly increasing the level of the ratio of -- the hedge ratio in the long-duration portfolio. We expect to do this or we seek to do is to have less volatility in the results. We think this is a strategy we're doing, but we don't want to rush in over hedging too fast, and we still see some potential for rates to go slower. But overall, that's the strategy so far.

The next question comes from Mr. Pedro Leduc from Itau BBA.

Congrats on the quarter. I'd like to pick your [ brands ] a little bit on loan book. It's growing very well, and we know that credit current and special. So first on that, what led you to have more comfort on this? What are you doing different? Is it -- what kind of clients are you going after or user profile on these cards? And then on the overall loan book pace, 30% yearly growth, if that's the level we should see also for the remaining of the year?

This is Alexandre speaking. Thank you for the question. So as you know, credit card is an important product for transactional banking vertical and the key driver of principality. So growth there is aligned with our short and long-term objectives. With that, when we think about specifically in the first quarter, we had a few factors contributing to growth. First was Loop. So our loyalty program is gaining a lot of traction. We've deployed several missions and these have been drivers of a lot more use on our cards with a lot of focus or a good contribution from higher income clients also that use the upper scale products. This has been good. A second part is an early contribution in the total portfolio coming from PIX Financing and also bill pay and cash financing. It's growing. So it starts to contribute for the growth of the portfolio. And also last but not least, the continuity of our usual growth, and that includes new clients from onboarding that we continue underwriting credit limits, and we're having good engagement. New clients for the credit card products coming from the behavior models. We're also very active on underwriting those limits and a big focus on gains of share of wallet on existing customers. So clients that are already using credit cards, we've been doing all the typical increases of limits. And again, with Loop, it's easier to sell this engagement. So we'll keep working in this direction throughout the year. And that's good here for the business. When moving forward the growth, it's going to be in the ballpark that Santiago just mentioned. So we're going to be in the 30s. And with the credit profile evolving in parallel with good growth on FGTS, so products with low delinquency, balancing with products that might have a little bit more delinquency. And so we see growth in NPLs at good levels as we saw in the first quarter.

Our next question comes from Ms. Neha Agarwala from HSBC.

Just a quick follow-up on the previous question regarding the unsecured credit lines that you're now expanding into. We have seen a lot of players offering PIX Financing now. Even the incumbent banks are increasingly improving their offering in PIX Financing. How do you think Inter can differentiate? Or you don't require differentiation given that you have 8% market share of PIX transactions, you could continue to grow aggressively on PIX Financing? And this BRL 170 million number that you've shown this quarter, where could this be by the end of this year roughly? Where do you see these new lines growing into at least by the end of this year? That would be very helpful for us to kind of anticipate what kind of growth we should imagine. João Vitor Nazareth Teixeira de Souza: Joao Vitor speaking here. Thank you for the question. As I told you before, it's a mantra at Inter that we like to move forward but with caution, mostly on unsecured credit portfolio. But the good news is we're putting these new products up and running, the clients are adopting very fast. And lastly, the way that people, they buy this product with us, it's 100% digital through our app in a very seamless way. This help us to grow fast. And also to mention, by having the best cost of funding in the market, we can have a very good profitability on that. We have been tracking delinquency of the product, PIX Financing, Buy Now Pay Later for our Intershop, the Boleto payment option and the withdrawal option with BITs. So far, as I mentioned before in the previous question, the numbers are better than the credit card, and therefore, the economics are much better without the intermediaries that I also mentioned on the previous question. So our appetite for this consumer finance 2.0 is big. I believe that, as you said, having a big market share on the market, a good cost of funding and a very seamless way to hire the products, we believe that we'll gather again with caution a big market share of the market going forward.

Understood. If I can just follow up on the cost side. I mean, we continue to see very good cost control, and that has definitely helped in boosting up the ROE. How -- what kind of levels do you have for this year in terms of cost control? Should we see continued kind of cost performance or can we see big moves this year? I think the biggest move happened last year, but what kind of expectations can we have for this year in terms of cost growth and cost control measures? Congratulations once again.

Thanks, Neha. This is Alexandre speaking. So on cost control, one reality is we keep surprising ourselves. We expected it to grow marginally. It's not that we expect it to grow aligned with revenues. We want to gain efficiency, right? So we need operating leverage, and we need this to happen. But with technology, with gains from implementation of new technologies and all the projects that we've been doing to keep costs under control, we've been surprising ourselves quarter after quarter. As we look forward, we still see a little bit of what we said in the last quarter call, which was having the costs growing at about half the pace that we see revenue growth. So that's kind of how we are aiming and how we are running the company. João Vitor Nazareth Teixeira de Souza: And Neha, here Joao speaking. Just to complement Alexandre, it's important to mention that it's not by accident that our expenses are growing way less than the revenues. We need to think that by design, Inter was structure without the big IT legacy systems, without the brands, 100% cloud-based, with a very developed database. So we are working with that with now the technology that we have on our kitchen under the hood to work and to improve the number of clients that we can serve, proactive employee, the number of products that we can offer in our Super App. So, all of these combined have been helping us to achieve this operational leverage, and we believe that we're just scratching the surface. So we see how we have been able to reduce from almost 90% cost-to-income to 47% cost-to-income in just maybe 3 or 4 quarters. It's really a very good achievement. And I believe that this metric is going to be maybe the one that we're going to get first in our 60/30/30 plan, very excited with the cost control, with the operational leverage that we are putting in the balance sheet.

The next question comes from Mr. Flavio Yoshida from Bank of America.

Congrats on the strong print. So I have one questions here on my side. The first one is on engagement and principality. So in fact, we see many banks talking about seeking client's principality. And I was wondering how -- what do you think it's key to get the clients' principality? So have you a view that credit limit is very important? But I'm not 100% sure about it. So if you could elaborate on this, on how to increase engagement levels, it will be great. And then my second question is on the coverage ratio. So you're seeking growth on unsecured credit lines, right, including credit cards. You are running with a stable coverage ratio around 130%. But when we see other banks, other listed banks historical data, we see an average around 200%. So how comfortable are you guys with this level? Do you think it will be necessary to drive this coverage level up considering that the loan mix is getting riskier?

This is Alexandre. So I'll start with the engagement and principality part, and then Santi will talk about the portfolio and risk part. And what we see is, first, strategically, how do we position ourselves to gain principality to have high engagement. It's about several things. So not only credit card, but a lot about the product. So we've been differentiating ourselves since the early days back -- like IT [ owned ] in 2018 and invested a lot in bringing many different products to our Super App. So a lot of transactional banking features. So we have today the best peaks in the market based by the -- like the Central Bank rating system, and that's an important one. But then we have a lot of different verticals, including insurance. A very complete investment platform, all Intershop, adding a lot of value to customers. More recently, our global account offering that drives tremendous engagement from a lot of upper scale clients. So having the Super App offering with all the products within the same app at a seamless user experience is for us the biggest driver of principality. People don't need to leave [ Intercept ] to take care of their entire financial lives. And we'll keep moving there and to get more principality. And when we get more to the [ tactics ], to the tactical action items, then we do a lot of things to make sure that we bring everything that I talked before as soon as possible to Inter. So for example, when we think [ PIX ], an important part of the process is to get one of the clients' main [ PIX ] keys, as they are called in Brazil. We've been doing a lot of that, on getting clients to engage with…

So on the coverage ratio, we have 2 different realities. On the one hand, we have the unsecured part, which is around 30%. That has tariff ratios which are higher than 130. And then the secured part, which has a lower. The blended is what the market sees, which is the 130. But inside that, there are different realities. What we have is a big level also of fragmentation or diversification on individual clients within the portfolio. So what we will see is how the portfolio mix evolves through time. So far, the changes had been too significant, that 30% now stands at 32%, the [ unsecured ] part. So it wasn't something that made a substantial change in the coverage ratio. But if we do happen to have a bigger growth or bigger share on the unsecured part, we would assess that accordingly. But we do not see our portfolio in the future having a mix significantly skewed towards unsecured. We do imagine unsecured growing beyond the 30%, but nothing substantially higher than that.

The next question comes from Mr. Yuri Fernandes from JP Morgan.

Congrats on the quarter. I have a question regarding payroll loans. You provided the breakdown of personnel, excluding FGTS. So to me, the ex FGTS is basically payroll. It has not been growing. So I would like to understand what has been your view on the product? Is there any challenging on originating this more digitally, like whatever you can comment on your expectations for this -- the more traditional payroll, let's put this way? And also if you can comment on -- a follow-up on this question on potential changes to the product. So today, we see lower rates like rate caps from the government. But we also see the government going for some kind of marketplaces for payroll, kind of potentially make it easier for digital guys like yourselves to maybe offer some of those products. So whatever you can comment on those initiatives if we believe they will happen, if you have any timing, I think it can also help. So basically, what is happening because we are not growing? And can you accelerate growth if we see changes for this product?

This is Alexandre speaking. Thank you for your question. So starting with the traditional payroll loans. I'll cover a few different topics that we're seeing and how we're approaching the product. So first is like portfolio management. Our focus is on having a healthy and profitable portfolio. Having said that, we're happy that -- or even on a stable portfolio in size, so we remained in the BRL 5 billion ballpark. We grew our implied rates by 80 bps in 1 quarter. So this was very positive, and there is a lot of room to keep this trend, given our discipline in pricing and the rates of the overall portfolio that are considerably lower than the current levels. Second, in terms of origination channels, as we have communicated before, we've been evolving from an origination that used to be mostly omni-channel, which is like digital with human support to a hybrid of omni-channel, so the same one as before and a digital on origination. We see early results already happening of the digital on origination with a lot of INSS through WhatsApp going on already, and we're confident that we should resume portfolio growth throughout 2024. So this, I believe, are the main points as we think about the traditional payroll. So we'll keep the discipline to grow on this portfolio. When you think about everything that we've heard in the market, so we've heard noise on the FGTS product. We believe this product is here to stay. It's the lowest cost loan or loan that's a normal worker can get in Brazil. So this is a product that we do 100% digitally. We're confident it's here to stay. And on the other issues that we've heard through the last few months, private payroll can be a gigantic opportunity, although…

The next question comes from Mr. [ Andrew Garrity ] from Morgan Stanley.

I just wanted to briefly ask about how we should think about the income from derivatives portion of your securities income, which ultimately gets included in the NII. There was a pretty significant swing in this line quarter-over-quarter. Can you just kind of provide some more details as to what happened? And do you expect this to continue to be a tailwind for NII for the rest of the year?

Santiago taking this one. So what we do is we break down the result of that derivatives, which are interest rates of the longer duration portfolios that I mentioned earlier in a question. We break that down by product, and we have that to calculate the implied rates at the portfolio level. We disclosed that in the release. We disclosed that in the excel file of the IR website called Historical Series. And with that, you can see how the interest rates of real estate loans, personal loans, et cetera, performed through time. So I guess the way that we think about is how will the interest rates considering the hedges will evolve through time. And as Alexandre said, the payroll, which is the main part of personal loans, there we are still with a portfolio that is running at around 1.25% per month, and we originated about 1.6%. So those rates will continue to go up. And the same thing on real estate, which is a bit more complicated because we have inflation adjusted loans there, but they're also increasing the performance quarter-by-quarter. But to answer the question, we do break down that at the product level. That is part of the hedge that touches directly the interest income as well and part that goes to the derivative line. But to see all that together, we do the work and now we show it in the breakdown to calculate the all-in rates of the portfolio.

The next question comes from Mr. Ricardo Buchpiguel from BTG.

I have two here on my side. First, can you please share some light on when do you expect to have the NPL formation declining? And if you could provide an update for this metric so far in Q2 as we have April and a little bit of May numbers? I want to basically get an idea on when we could see cost of risk declining more as a reduction in this indicator is very important for that? And for my second question, we saw that personnel expenses decreased by around 14% quarter-over-quarter, due to, if I'm not mistaken, lower bonus provisioning. So I want to understand what was the rationale for that? And does it make sense to consider this level as a recurring base going forward?

Santiago here. So on NPL formation, we did have 2 consecutive quarters of NPL formation decreasing. This one was margin at 4 basis points, but it is a lower number in the fourth quarter despite the pressure that we have typically in the first quarter. We don't see this number changing too much. As I mentioned before in another question, we think that the asset quality metrics will stay at around these levels, potentially a bit better, but not meaningfully different from what we have now. The cost of risk was 5.2%. We see it operating also at around that level, maybe even closer to 5.5% throughout the year. But ultimately, the second half drives more of the final outcome as there is more growth there. And we also have to see the level of penetration and success that we will have on the unsecured lines like PIX Credit and Buy Now Pay Later which are ramping up. In terms of the personnel expenses, we did have the same situation at the beginning of last year. We do have higher expenses of bonuses of which -- a few of which are provisioned throughout the year, and we decided to pay voluntarily in the fourth quarter. Last year was a very good year. So we wanted to recognize the personnel and the talent, again, the huge effort that the team throughout Inter put in a year that was very strong in terms of effort to get the results done. This year, we start at this level. That number will go up throughout the quarters. But we tend to provision as the net income growth quarter-by-quarter.

This conference call is now concluded. Inter's IR area is at your disposal to answer any additional questions. Thank you for attending today's presentation. Have a good day.