Welcome to Intrusion Inc.’s Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2022 Earnings Conference Call and Webcast. At this time, all participant lines are in a listen-only mode. [Operator Instructions] Please note, this conference is being recorded. An audio replay of the conference call will be available on the company's website within a few hours after this call. I would now like to turn the call over to Sam Cohen with Alpha Investor Relations.

Thank you, and welcome. Joining me today are Tony Scott, Chief Executive Officer; and Kimberly Pinson, Chief Financial Officer. The call is being webcast, and will be archived on the Investor Relations section of our website. Before I turn the call over to Tony, I'd like to remind everyone that statements made during this conference call relating to the company's expected future performance, future business prospects, future events or plans may include forward-looking statements as defined under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Please refer to our SEC filings for more information on the specific risk factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the projections described in today's conference call. Any forward-looking statements that we make on this call are based upon information that we believe as of today, and we undertake no obligation to update these statements as a result of new information or future events. In addition to US GAAP reporting, we report certain financial measures that do not conform to generally accepted accounting principles. During the call, we may use non-GAAP measures, if we believe it is useful to investors, or if we believe it will help investors better understand our performance or business trends. With that, let me now turn the call over to Tony for a few opening remarks.

Thank you, Sam. Good afternoon and thank you all for joining us today. In today's call, I'll cover our Q4 results, as well as talk about Intrusion's full year performance. And I think that longer-term perspective is useful to understand our long-term goals and objectives. Our fourth quarter top line results did not live up to our expectations. However, for the full year, Intrusion improved its overall performance in nearly every standard metric. -- capping an important year-long journey where we made significant progress along our financial, operational and strategic objectives. I'll talk more about those accomplishments later. Total revenues for the fourth quarter were $1.4 million, a decrease of $0.2 million compared to the fourth quarter of 2021, and a decrease of $0.8 million from Q3. Shield revenues for the fourth quarter were $0.3 million, which was flat sequentially and up $0.2 million compared to the fourth quarter of 2021. This was disappointing, but understandable when taken in the context of the broader macroeconomic landscape. We released the Cloud and Endpoint solutions late in the third quarter and didn't expect any meaningful contribution to our revenue in Q4 2022. On a positive note, interest remains strong for the Shield family of products, with several larger deals that we didn't get across the finish line in Q4 remaining in our qualified pipeline. Our consulting business was relatively flat through the first three quarters of 2022, and somewhat as expected. However, during the fourth quarter, the business experienced a year-over-year revenue decline of $0.4 million, due to the loss of a single contract. Intrusion's prime contract sponsor experienced leadership changes and subsequently chose not to renew the final option year of a contract that had been in place since 2018. Intrusion's gross margin on this contract was 14%. And as a…

Thanks, Tony. We continue to benefit from the increased focus and intensity on cybersecurity solutions and expect our results going forward to reflect the strong demand from customers and channel partners for our Intrusion suite of products. We expect that going forward, these new products, as well as the advancements made to our existing Shield on-premise solutions will guide the transformation into our recurring revenue, high-margin and software-focused business model, supported by the stability of our consulting business. I would now like to discuss our financial performance for the quarter and full year period ended December 31, 2022. Revenues for the fourth quarter of 2022 were $1.4 million, a decrease of $0.7 million sequentially and $0.4 million year-over-year. Revenue was $7.5 million for the full year ended December 31, 2022, an increase of $0.3 million compared to 2021. Fourth quarter revenues for our consulting business were $1.1 million, a decrease of 25% year-over-year and 40% sequentially. Full year 2022 revenues for our consulting business were $6.4 million, a decrease of $0.4 million or 6% year-over-year. As Tony stated earlier, the decline in our consulting revenues is due to a loss of a consulting contract in the fourth quarter. That contract represented almost $2.6 million in annual revenues. Fortunately, this contract carried a lower margin profile, so the impact on our bottom line was not as pronounced. However, we do expect consulting revenues in 2023 to increase as a result of our ongoing business development efforts. Shield revenues for the three and 12 months ended December 31, 2022, totaled $0.3 million and $1.2 million, representing 22% and 16% of total revenues, respectively. In comparison to prior year periods, Shield revenues increased $0.2 million for the quarter and $0.7 million for the full year, both representing a year-over-year increase of 124%. During…

Thanks, Kim. To conclude, I want to let you know that I believe we're moving forward with our transformation through compelling products and innovative strategies. We have positive momentum as a result of the great strides that the team has made in 2022 to right-size the organization, develop new products, and revamp our sales and marketing, which allows us to capitalize on the strong sales pipeline we've developed and drive further revenue expansion as we carry over this progress into 2023. We look forward to sharing the next steps in our journey with all of you, and we thank our investors for your continued support as we execute our strategy. This concludes our prepared remarks. And I'll now turn the call over to the operator for Q&A.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Your first question today comes from the line of Scott Buck with H.C. Wainwright. Your line is now open.

Hi, good afternoon guys. Thank you for taking my questions. Tony, it sounds like from the release in your comments that you're seeing a little bit of hesitation from potential customers and getting some of these sales over the finish line. What do you think breaks that hold and allow some of those sales to actually go through?

Sure. Great question, Scott. So what we're seeing is an interesting thing that I think we can address in our sales process. What we've seen is some what I'd call late-breaking questions that we can in the future and should address much earlier in the sales cycle. So that's been a bit of a hang up. Things like integration with other products, kinds of, questions and also details on IP addresses that we block, what are the specific reasons we block them and things like that, all of which we've learned from, and we've -- we're building back into our sales process, so that salespeople can clear those hurdles much earlier in the cycle. So it's been a bit of a learning. And then also, it's been training our channel partners to answer some of these questions earlier in the process as well. So we're learning. But I think the good news is we're starting to see smart questions and enthusiasm for what we do as we do this proof of values and so on. So I'm not discouraged by these questions, although, as noted, it has delayed the sales cycle in a number of cases.

Great. I think that's helpful. And then could you give us some indication of what the early color or feedback has been on cloud and endpoint. I know you had somewhere between three, six months at this point of sales. So just curious what you're hearing there.

Yeah. Well, I kind of discount Q4 just because it's filled with holidays and people are distracted and so on. But in Q1, we've seen increased interest. Again, there's a learning here selling cloud and endpoint, it’s little different than selling the appliance. And so we're learning from those conversations with customers. One of the areas that looks interesting in the cloud discussion, in particular is people that are migrating workloads to the cloud seems to be a good entry point for us, to have the kind of conversations we'd like to have, when they're moving workloads from on-prem or -- on-prem or from one cloud to another is sort of a great place for us to engage.

Okay. Perfect. And then last one, Kim, it looked like sales and marketing expenses were up sequentially. I assume that, due to some of these newer product launches. What should we expect for 2023 in terms of that expense line?

Yeah. You're correct in terms of the expense in the fourth quarter. We do plan on continuing to invest in sales and marketing. And I think that, you won't see us as marked of an increase, but we do plan to continue to invest, and you'll see it stay relatively flat, or increase over the course of the year.

Okay. Great. I appreciate the time guys. Thank you.

Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Zach Cummins with B. Riley Securities. Your line is now open.

Yeah. Hi, good morning, Tony and Kim. Thanks for taking my questions. Kim, I think you mentioned within your script that Shield saw a little more churn here in Q4 once again. It sounds like it was one of our legacy customers that had adopted Shield outdate. Can you give us a sense of kind of what – what was going on in that situation and some other initiatives that you're undertaking to monitor the overall health of that Shield customer base?

Well, as I mentioned in the script, it was an early Shield customer, and the Shield appliance was never fully deployed and were not utilizing the shield appliance. And so we have taken steps actively monitor the utilization of the appliances that are out there and be in contact with the customers to make sure that, they're seeing the full value of the Shield product. So we do not anticipate to continue to see this recurring in the future.

And this is Tony. Let me add just a couple of things there. Things like making sure they're on a current release that, they're getting updates that, the reports are being looked at are all different ways we can sort of monitor, how customers are either using or not using the product as the case maybe. So I'm feeling a lot better in terms of where we're at on that front than I was six months or so, I'll say.

Got it. Got it. That's helpful. And just another final question for me is just really around the traction that you're seeing with partners right now. It's great to hear that, your qualified pipeline is up 5x versus even what you're seeing in Q4. Can you just talk about maybe what it's going to take to really start to get momentum building there in terms of closing some of these customer deals across that partner channel here in the coming quarters?

Well, my view is, it's a contact sport. So – you got to get out there, rub shoulders create awareness and get the conversation going. And as you might guess, it takes a little while to get partners spun up. They've got to understand the product. They got to get trained. They got to go out and talk to customers and see if there's a fit, if there's a compelling moment for them to introduce us into that cycle. And all of that takes a few turns of the crank. But the good news is when we get our foot in the door, we've not left in most cases. So our opportunity is to go stick our foot in the door in a lot more places with these partners. And we're starting to see that happen. So…

Got it. Thanks for taking my questions. And best of luck with the remainder of the quarter.

Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Ed Woo with Ascendiant Capital. Your line is now open.

Yes. Thanks for taking my question. My question is, have you noticed any change in the competitive environment, especially at the macro environment gets worse? Have you seen competition on pricing?

I think the biggest thing that I've noticed, and I get this from lots of friends or CIOs across the country is they're under pressure for two things. One is supplier consolidation. What I think everyone is realizing is that the more suppliers you have in a given area, the more administrative overhead there is, the more contract administration there is, the more you have to pay attention to renewal dates and deadlines and all of that sort of stuff. So I definitely see a call for given a set of products. To that end, I think you'll see an announcement coming out from us this afternoon around an agreement we've reached with Netgate, who is the creator of a open source-based firewall called pfSense, that's super popular. I think it's been downloaded 7 million times or something like that. It is the benchmark that all firewalls compare themselves to. And Netgate’s created a pfSense Plus product, now that takes the open-source and tunes it to specific hardware platforms and so on. And our agreement with Netgate, I think, will play well into that trend of, hey, I want fewer vendors and I want more capability out of the platforms that I use. And so we view this arrangement with Netgate as playing into where the customers are and what customers want, which is timely in the marketplace right now.

Great. Well, thanks for answering my question.

Your next question comes from the line of Brian Kinstlinger with Alliance Global Partners. Your line is now open.

This is Shervin [ph] on for Brian. Thanks for taking my question. You gave good detail on the pipeline. Could you talk about maybe the average deal size in the Shield pipeline? And do you think maybe from a timeline visibility standpoint, the next few deals, will they be in the first half? You think can maybe bring them over the finish line within the next two three months. That would be great. Thanks.

Well, our plan is to land every deal we can. I would say the averages don't mean that much at this particular point because frankly, they've been all over the map, and I don't see a specific trend at this particular point. What I do see is some of the bigger deals that are in the pipeline, the customers want to do kind of a smaller trial to get started. And then once they've successfully completed that proof-of-value than are opening the discussion with us in terms of bigger, broader sorts of deployment. So, at this point, I don't read a lot into those averages or those numbers because they're just too small a number to be statistically meaningful, if you will, but I am encouraged by the trend.

Great. Thanks. That's all I have.

Your next question comes from the line of Aaron Warwick with Breakout Investors. Your line is now open.

Hey, good afternoon. Thanks for taking the call. Just wanted to probe a little bit on the Carahsoft partnership that you guys recently announced. My understanding is they're highly respected organization in the D.C. area. And just sort of what's the plan and the opportunity with them, when might we see you bearing some fruit from that partnership?

Yes, I think Carahsoft was a key partner for us. When I was federal CIO, I paid a lot of attention to who our innovative partners were and the federal government obviously buys a lot of technology. The perception is that a lot of it is with really large federal system integrators. But increasingly, even when I was there four or five years ago, Carahsoft was the kind of scrappy innovative company that was doing some of the more interesting deals with the federal government. They had gotten themselves on to all of the major contract vehicles. They were quite clever in terms of figuring out how to combine pieces of things together to create a solution that a specific customer wanted. They had a reputation for great customer service and interaction. And so when I got here, it was one of the first conversations we wanted to go have and I only wish we'd gotten it started and forgotten it, landed a little sooner than we did. But I think in the long run, they're going to be a great partner for us in the markets that they serve. In terms of momentum, you know the federal cycle, it takes a long time to get going and then once you get going, then it's interesting for a really long time. And so I don't think we're going to see a change in that pattern from Carahsoft. This is more of a mid to long-term bet, but one that I think will be meaningful for our commercial products. They're not representing us on the traditional federal consulting contracts that we have, this is all about our commercial products, Shield and so on.

Right. Right. Thank you. Appreciate that. And then one that caught me by surprise was the Shield Mobile. I don't recall you having spoken about that before. I just wondered kind of what -- if you could talk a little bit more about what the plan is with that and what the opportunities you see there?

Well, this is mobile version 1.0. And the move there is increasingly mobile platforms are the platforms that people use, moving away from traditional PCs and so on. So it's an important surface area to protect. I felt we needed to be in that space. And we had the ability to take our core endpoint technology and move it on to the Android platform. So through that vehicle, we'll get really good feedback from customers, it also gives potential customers a super easy way to try out our technology and to test it in their own environment even without us having to make a sales call or suggest that they try it. That said, I don't expect that in the short run, it's going to be a huge revenue contributor, but every little bit helps. I think in the short run, at least, it's better for us from a marketing perspective and an awareness perspective and the ease of insertion into the conversation with customers.

Yes. That's good. Thank you. Final one for me, I guess, is just an update. Last year, you talked about potentially several strategic partnerships with macroeconomic innovation and situations that were more specific to that company for those companies, those were delayed. What was the status of that you had kind of mentioned, I think, on the last call that if there was no progress after the first of the year, you might have to look into other companies as well. You're just with the three that you would target. What's the left on those?

So, no progress on the original ones that I was targeting. I have started conversations with additional partners, and it's one of the things that led to this Netgate conversation, quite frankly, as we looked around at the ecosystem and said, who are the players we could logically partner with. An interesting thing happened. A lot of people we were talking to about our products also use pfSense. And I think we've discussed on prior calls, people sometimes confuses with a firewall or want to know what firewalls we work best with, those kinds of conversations. So when we looked around and said, who would be a good company for us to align ourselves with, there was tremendous synergy with Netgate and their pfSense Plus family of products. And in the course of that conversation, nearly everyone we talked to said, hey, good move. That's going to be a great combination of Intrusion and pfSense Plus from Netgate. So stay tuned. We'll see where that goes.

Great. Thank you. I appreciate your time, guys.

Your next question comes from the line of Harold Jennings [ph] with Goldman Sachs. Your line is now open.

Thank you for taking my question. Thank you, very much for making the presentation, Tony. With regard to the Netgate and pfSense, could you give us some idea as to the timing as to, when we could hopefully see some revenues from this relationship and maybe some sort of sense as to the magnitude of how good this combination could be? Thank you.

Sure. Thanks, Harold, for the question. So, the good news is, we've been using pfSense here at Intrusion for a long time. And we also have a couple of customers, who've got extensive experience with it and us as well. So, we know how these things work well together. So, I imagine that in a few weeks, we'll have a very specific SKU that we can offer in the marketplace. And then over time, we'll do more and more work to more fully integrate these products. In terms of revenue, your guess is as good as mine at this particular point. But I think the opportunity here is with 7 million downloads and some pretty significant portion of that active users of pfSense, that's a great audience for us to market to and to have a conversation with. And even in our larger customers who are looking for larger enterprises that are looking for more cost-effective solutions. This is a great product that as they try to manage their budgets and manage some of the other things that I talked about earlier. So, hard to predict at this particular point, I'd say, but I wouldn't have done it, if I didn't think it was going to be meaningful for us this year.

At this time, there are no further questions in the queue. I'll turn the call back over to our host, Mr. Tony Scott.

All right. I do want to make one additional comment as we close the call. Just to add a little color on Kim's liquidity remarks. We do need to bring in additional funds within the next 30 days. And although there can be no assurances that we'll be able to raise such funds on a timely basis or on satisfactory terms, we are actively evaluating our options for additional financing and believe that the capital markets remain open to us. So, I think we've said that, a couple of different ways in the broadcast, but that's -- I want to make sure that the point is well understood. So, thank you, everybody, for your time and attention and your patience, and I look forward to speaking with you on next quarter's call and for those that analysts, I'm sure we'll have follow-up questions in the next few days. Thanks very much.

This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for attending. You may now disconnect.