Welcome to the Iridium First Quarter 2016 Earnings Conference Call. My name is Sophia and I’ll be your operator for today’s call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct a question-and-answer session. Please note that this conference is being recorded. I will now turn the call over to Ken Levy. Ken, you may begin.

Thanks Sophia. Good morning and welcome to Iridium’s first quarter 2016 earnings call. Joining me on today’s call are Matt Desch, our CEO; and Tom Fitzpatrick, our CFO. Today’s call will begin with a discussion of our first quarter results followed by Q&A. I trust you’ve had an opportunity to review this morning’s earnings release which is available on the Investor Relations section of Iridium’s website. Before I turn things over to Matt, I’d like to caution all participants that our call this morning may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts and include statements about our future expectations, plans and prospects. Such forward-looking statements are based upon our current beliefs and expectations and are subject to risks, which could cause actual results to differ from our forward-looking statements. Such risks are more fully discussed in our filings with the SEC. Our remarks today should be considered in light of such risks. Any forward-looking statements represent our views only as of today. And while we may elect to update forward-looking statements at some point in the future, we specifically disclaim any obligation to do so, even if our views or expectations change. During the call, we’ll also be referring to certain non-GAAP financial measures. These non-GAAP financial measures are not prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. Please refer to today’s earnings release in the Investor Relations section of our website for a reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures. With that, let me turn things over to Matt.

Thanks, Ken. Good morning, everyone. It’s been about two months now since our last call, and we continue to make good progress on our business objectives and on Iridium NEXT. I want to start by providing an update on our satellite and launch program and then will provide an overview of our quarterly business performance. Our first launch with SpaceX remains our near-term focus and there’s lots of excitement on our end as we’re seeing all the pieces of the Iridium NEXT program, come together. Our team continues to rehearse launch scenarios to prepare for satellite deployment, and qualification testing on our first few satellites has now been fully completed. Satellite qualification will validate the functionality of the Iridium NEXT design and confirm the reliability and consistency of the manufacturing process. In all, we will produce 81 satellites for Iridium NEXT. And to meet our production rates, the satellites need to move efficiently from parts and sub-assemblies to a high quality manufacturing process that quickly and carefully assembles each satellite, loads software and completes final testing. Iridium NEXT assembly line approach to satellite construction is unique. I know some of you had the chance to visit Orbital ATK satellite manufacturing facility in Arizona during last year’s Investor Day and see the production line for our satellite. Compared to then, it’s really hopping now. The activity in organization of the assembly process is truly impressive, particularly now that they are starting to hit their stride. Similar to an auto assembly line, Orbital and Thales Alenia staff are both integrating components and doing environmental testing at the state-of-the-art facility. There are 18 stations through which every Iridium NEXT satellite passes, each station contributing a number of important steps. Each satellite is expected to progress through these stations from start to finish in…

Thanks Matt. Good morning, everyone. I’ll get started by summarizing our key financial metrics for the first quarter, then recap the 2016 and long-term guidance we affirmed this morning. I’ll close with review of our balance sheet and capital structure and finally provide an update on our launch insurance placement. Iridium generated first quarter total revenue of $104.2 million, which was up 7% from last year’s comparable quarter. Revenue growth was fueled by strength in government service, accompanied by increases in equipment sales and revenue from government-sponsored support projects. Operational EBITDA was strong at $60.7 million, an increase of about 16% from the prior period. Our operational EBITDA margin also strengthened this quarter to 58% from 54% a year earlier. From an operating view point, we reported commercial service revenue of $57.8 million in the first quarter, which was about 1% higher than prior year’s quarter. This reflects the headwinds we spoke to in our February call. We continue to expect that the strong U.S. dollar and global economic weakness in key industrial sectors will restrain commercial growth this year. During the quarter, we added 3,000 net commercial customers with a gain coming entirely from our M2M business. Commercial M2M data subscribers represent 51% of billable commercial subscribers, an increase from 49% during the year ago period. In our commercial voice and data business, net subscriber growth was in line with last year’s comparable quarter while M2M net subscriber growth was weaker than in the year ago period. We note that in the first quarter, three oil and gas related service providers had materially higher net deactivations than in year ago period, partially offsetting this with the increasing rate of subscriber growth from our personal locator and heavy equipment customers. While heavy equipment subscriber growth is accelerating, the rate of…

Sophia, if you can open up the lines for Q&A?

Thank you. We’ll now begin the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instruction] And our first question comes from Greg Burns from Sidoti & Company.

I was wondering if you could just comment on the DoD’s U.S. network, how that might keep with Iridium’s constellation and it might affect your current negations with the DoD?

Obviously, I know why you are asking the question from those written a couple of weeks ago, which was overall just a piece filled within the accuracies and mischaracterizations et cetera, which that was only one, but specifically MUOS was something envisioned back in 2002. I think back then was expected to be delivered long before today and do something a lot closer to what Iridium does today. The general view today is that when it’s implemented, and it’s really more like 2018 when they really start delivering devices for it, which doesn’t even include a handset at this point and there is no plans for that at this point, it’s not really competitive longer to us. I think if you talk to the MUOS group at DoD et cetera and others, they see us more complementary these days that what they’re doing and what we’re doing is really much more in line. We have better coverage, we do different things, we have different services, we have smaller devices, we do machine to machine, we do handheld voice services et cetera. So, idea that somehow that changes our trajectory in anyway really would be -- it’s not just surprising to us but would be surprising frankly to the DoD and it’s pretty reflective in how they’re continuing to invest heavily in what we’re doing, with all the plans we have together with them. That’s sort of reiterating something that might have been said maybe 10 to 12 years ago, but would never be said today.

And in terms of Aireon, are they contractually obligated to deliver the hosted payment to you by a specific date?

The receivables do in tranches and it bears interest. So, their duty, if you will, is to pay us when it’s financially possible for them to raise the debt in order to do so. And so that’s their obligation under the contract.

Okay. So, there is no specific date for them to go to market…

Just to say, they need to go to market when it is practical.

And in terms of getting Aireon operational, aside from putting the host of payload on the satellite and getting into the sky, I mean, how do we move to commercialization or operational viability once the satellite starts going up, do they begin testing, once the first few satellites go up and then they will be ready once the full constellation is up or how do they begin delivering service?

Yes, it’s a good question. They actually have been -- in conjunction with the payload being developed, have been finishing their ground network, their back office billing systems, their operation systems, and those frankly today are being tested thoroughly. They’re running their own test scenarios, are actually literally tracking aircraft through their ground systems and practicing all the things they need to be ready. They have hired and developed operation staff and frankly are doing all the things they need to do. They have operational plans underway with those initial customers and are starting to implement the servers necessary to deliver the data to them et cetera. When we start launching satellites this summer, there is a period in which we position the satellites and check them out and do payload testing and then at a period of time, and I forget how many days it turns out to be after launch and the satellites are ready, then we allow them to start controlling their payload and getting their data and managing their system et cetera. And when that starts happening, they will be tracking aircraft and we’ll be running through their systems including testing, billing systems and operational systems and all the things that they’re doing. They’re all ready to go there, it’s very integrated plan with our team. So that will start shortly, I’d say more than a few weeks, I think after initial launch, maybe more like a month and a half, two months something like that. But then their data really starts flowing. Our first satellites actually are planned to all go into operation, or 10 will go into operation. We had a number of scenarios, currently right now; we expect to put all those in the operation and not have to drift any of those. So, they’ll have 10 payloads, pretty quickly in a single plane providing relatively real time continuous service over periods of time. And they can demonstrate that to all their customers and they can practice with that and do everything. But it’s really as the network then gets built; they’ll get more and more data, finally when the network is completed in late 2018. They will really have a complete network and can start providing operational pay for service in 2018, that’s our current plan.

And the next question comes from Andrew from Macquarie.

First, there seems to be some confusion as the timeline on de-orbiting satellites you’re your current constellation. Can you comment on that? And I have a follow-up.

That obviously comes from that same piece and it’s surprised a heck out of us. No type of the orbit mandate from the FCC exists. I think that was conflated as best as I can do is taking from the fact that our existing license was extended back in 2010 or 2012 to an arbitrate date of January 31 2018 with the FCC. And because we thought that was a reasonable date to just pick at that time and still is a good date but really we want to extend that data further. We just put some paper work and that’s a normal routine operation for a satellite operator. And given everywhere we’re at, we’re going to do that. So that FCC license that we have has absolutely nothing to do with any kind of the orbit or actually any kind of operational aspects of our existing network which we control independently. And we have lots of fuel and frankly to go a number of years beyond even after 2018 if we wanted to with those satellites but really have no desire or interest to so. When the appropriate time comes that we choose to de-orbit those, we’ll choose to de-orbit those on our time schedule. And we’ll try to by the way de-orbit those quite quickly because that’s just business practice and the right thing any satellite operator should do once they’re finished with their assets in space, so absolutely no truth or relevance to that statement that was made in some forums.

Great. And secondly, the FX and energy market seems to be stabilizing, what are you hearing from your wholesalers right now?

From the wholesale suppliers about the general oil -- you mean on oil and gas specifically or in general?

Yes, generally and also may be your customers as far as in other countries as far as FX headwinds, I mean is pricing improving today?

I would say we’re still in sort of the same mode we were in last year. I don’t think it’s getting worse. And I think most of them have accounted for the pricing changes that they have et cetera. And we factor that all, obviously all into our guidance and feel good about it. So, it hasn’t gotten significantly worse but it’s also not got significantly better in any case right now. I think everybody is hopeful there’ll be a turnaround but nobody right now is projecting exactly when that will be and what that will do to say oil and gas service vehicles that have all been put away. I don’t think they’re flooding back out any time sooner or our partners are expecting at least this year to see those reactivated and put back on line or for that matter the heavy equipments or transportation sectors are also as you know experiencing the same kind of headwinds and are slowing down. I think that’s all factored into our expectations right now. And it doesn’t seem to be getting worse. And I’m hopeful it’s getting a little bit better but I don’t think that that kind of plays back immediately into our business results.

And the following question comes from James Breen from William Blair.

Thanks, just a couple of questions. One, what gives you confidence in terms of the long-term financial targets that you’ve laid out and how you are going to achieve those targets? And then, I have a follow-up.

So, certainly, we’re feeling very good about the EBITDA target of approximately 60% in 2018 and just note that we first put that number out in 2010. And so, having posted a quarter of 58% makes us feel like we’re in striking distance there. As we said before Jim that the building blocks to the service revenue growth is the low end of $420 million come from big slugs. And all the hosted payload revenues that are compensated some $47 million of incremental revenue into 2018 is contractual. Similarly, approximately $10 million is contractual with Telus. [Ph] And so, to get to the low end of the range, you just take a look at limited contribution from Certus, Push-to-Talk and M2M turnaround, you’re at the low end of the range. You get to the high-end of the range with a more rapid adoption of Certus. We’re out there with an expectation of $100 million opportunity in 2020 for Certus. And so you get to the higher end of the range to depending on rate of ramp of that service offering which we continue to be very optimistic about based on input that we get from our partners who play in -- who play in various verticals that we’re going be attacking. That’s kind of what underpins the elements of our guidance.

And then, can you just talk about where you are in terms of funding, getting everything launched before you turn free cash flow positive, so bit on the debt?

We’ve guided that and reiterated today that we’ll on leverage of peak we expect this year 6.5 times; we expect to exit 2018 at 4 times leverage. And so that’s in guidance we’ve been out there with sometime and we just reiterated that today.

And your next question comes from Andrew Spinola from Wells Fargo.

Hey, Matt, I found your commentary around the Ka band HTS capacity coming on line into maritime, pretty interesting. I just want to get your view on the opportunity there for Certus, because it sounds like you’re thinking that the real opportunity there is back up to VSAT but there is a pretty decent sized business that Inmarsat has providing L-band only connectivity to the ships. So, how do you see the opportunity going forward; how do you see the maritime markets are evolving?

I did mention that I do see it to be used as a standalone, I didn’t necessarily emphasize that. But I think a big percentage of our sales will be as standalone units, providing all kinds of services, crew data, crew voice, other types of unique services whether it’s integrated with Push-to-Talk or broadcast technologies, it certainly will be used as the GMDSS terminal on the ship, as that comes on line and get certified. So, there is lot of opportunity for it as a standalone product in the way that that market exists today and for which we serve, as a standalone product today with an open court or Iridium Pilot product that unfortunately doesn’t do the data rates, it’s been well received and it’s worked very well in the market; it just doesn’t have the speed that the new Certus product will have. Having a product that has better coverage, that is going to be frankly probably more than cost competitive, both in terms of equipment and data rates, based on our expectations of talking to our partners; they will have more service capability and will be able to do higher speeds. It makes it really attractive standalone offering for our partners to take the market in all kinds of applications, at all really level of shipping. But it does really, given that there is an increasing desire for very, very high speed, fixed cost services which all these Ka and Ku band people want to offer, there still is a belief in the market and for many, many years that those will all probably be coming with an L-band product whether Inmarsat is delivering the service and putting their own L-band product with their say GX services or other partners deliver Ku, Ka band, VSAT and most likely will be using us as their complementary product to that. But, it’s a big market. We’re not really that big into it still yet, after a number of years. And I think the market’s going to expand dramatically when we start putting products in the field.

And then, so, in March, I guess the IMO sort of came back to you with a checklist of things you need to accomplish, to achieve GMDSS certification. Can you give us a sense of what the things already you need to do, to receive approval and maybe what the timeframe is on that?

The bottom line is, they are still very supportive overall. It’s clear that we’re in the process and feel like we’re going to get to it. But the one thing that they wanted to see is, they wanted to process by which the terminals would be certified and validated. And there are no terminals yet to be certified and validated. And those really start coming next year. And so the process would be, they are going to develop the process on how they prove that those terminals are GMDSS terminals and then demonstrating that those are there. So, we think that the roadmap is pretty clear to us as how to get there, still got be work to done in terms of getting the products market we have to integrate with the emergency service center that are GMDSS compliant. We have to demonstrate that those linkages work well; that’s an activity that will happen over the next 12 to 18 months. So, overall, we think the roadmap is pretty clear for us and that we’ll be able to be GMDSS in the market in 2018 when all that’s done.

And the next question comes from Chris Quilty from Raymond James.

I wanted to circle back to Aireon. And I think Tom you said that Aireon would raise money when practical. And I guess the question is with the eight long-term service agreements is it practical that they can raise some capital?

I would say it’s getting more practical that they are planning -- anticipate an FAA contract in the fourth quarter of this year, which makes it very practical. So, that we calculate that they’re employing.

Cleary we’re talking about it now and they are starting to plan for that with their investors, both in terms of what they’re doing. I would also say, it’s been real pleased to see the number of other ANSPs in the world we want to participate in some way with Aireon and haven’t figured out how to do that yet, but there just continues to be people who want to be a part of this, I’d say transformation of global air surveillance. And I think that they’re working on all their options right now, and we’ll see how that all plays out over the next coming months.

And Tom, a clarification, in terms of the $20 million a year that Aireon pays to you, am I correct that that sort of feathers in proportionally to the number of satellites and service over time?

Yes. And it has a relationship to whether the FAA is in or not as well, in terms of how it steps up, but it gets to 20 quickly and then it stays there; it doesn’t increase based on volumes.

And on the U.S. government business, Matt, you had indicated that you thought this year you might see some incremental revenues relative to the fixed price contract. Is that still a possibility?

I didn’t say that in these comments. I said we’re working a lot effectively to very busy time for us actually against all opportunities which would drive, both incremental subscriber growth that is both within and part of the current contract we have with [indiscernible] which is great for the future but doesn’t necessary drive additional revenues. And then there is other opportunities that would drive you the commercial customers or potential additional services in the future on top of what we do today. I don’t know that will be that incremental for this year, it’s really more of a future type of thin, ‘17, ‘18 kind of thing that those projects already take time to ramp up and deliver revenues. But both are very, very active right now, frankly built on the both, great relationships, the great performance of the network, the contract that they see as very advantageous to innovation of service revenue growth, so all those are coming together.

And as a clarification, is the Push-to-Talk which the government was the first adaptor of the technology; is that technology continuing to deploy or are there still putts in around with further hardware network development stuff?

Well, actually, they are investing now again after a delay frankly of year and half or so where they didn’t have the funding but they are back to investing again in what I would call finalizing that product. Current product as you know provides regional nets and doesn’t really go as far as our commercial PTT product is a truly product. So to expand that, they are now investing in the R&D with us and others to expand that. And that would expect to happen this year and into next year so that that service would be finalized. There seems to be drivers for that within the government, specific services really want that global service and want to see it integrated with other technologies, so the R&D is moving again to get that done. But they are still deploying what they have but it’s I wouldn’t say growing because they really want this global capability or what they call now global services.

And on M2M side of the business, I think it should be a positive development with Garmin’s acquisition of DeLorme, which looks like that closed. Have you seen any movement there with Garmin to either broaden the distribution or adoption of that technology into their broader product line?

Yes, in fact I just met with them this last week and they’ve been pretty involved. I’m really; really pleased to see how they are looking at the acquisition of DeLorme. I think they see it as a bigger strategy in terms of connectivity for their terrestrial business. We’ve already had a business with them in the aviation sector which is different than their but love to see those things come together and I think they is some thinking around that. I think the most immediate advantage is really as they start planning and it hasn’t really happened yet but to bring the inReach product, the DeLorme inReach product out to their more expanded distribution than DeLorme had outside North America and other places where DeLorme has been strong and where Garmin is much stronger. So, I don’t think it is going to impact anything right away but I think as the year goes on and as next year happens I’m quite excited about the potential for that acquisition.

You don’t think that they will make a push to push that distribution in time for the holiday selling season?

I think you’d have to ask them but because I might be getting ahead of those discussions and telling you what their plans are but I really do think that they are actively working all kinds of market expansion and making that successful, so certainly wouldn’t surprise me, let’s say.

And final question for you here, the satellite testing and production, I couldn’t calculate and type at the same time, am I understanding in terms of the ramp of production that you don’t expect the completion and testing of 10 satellites for the first launch to be a gating factor?

That’s correct. I mean we see between now and first launch, a very credible and strong plan by our prime and their AIT supplier to deliver enough satellite for launch in time for the timeframe we’re talking about.

[Operator Instructions] And the following question comes from Jim from Chardan Capital.

The government engineering business has been strong in the past two quarters. My question is, is that likely to persist for the rest of the year? And are these services for the fixed price contract or is this for some additional contracts that you might be working on or a little of both?

I can talk to the latter question. I mean overall, it’s a broad range of areas related to how we interact in terms of R&D programs and things that we do on their behalf. We’ve mentioned for example, it’d include work like a new secure handset. They’ve now made the decision and are working actively and are funding to adapt our Iridium Extreme handset to be able to be used for secure use and working with general dynamics on that to do that. And that’s exciting development as far as we’re concerned because that lowers their cost. It gives them much more modern, smaller military spec handset, and frankly expands our base there in terms of that platform. And there is a couple of other projects like that both are related to work that would -- you could call, both inside and outside that current contract. Maybe really unrelated to it that for example, improving and expanding the government gateway to be ready for Iridium NEXT, the new services are things that they fund and hard to call that whether that inside or outside the contract, it’s certainly supportive of it.

And the answer that yes, we see a favorable comp year-over-year on engineering and support services, which is a good in its own right, Jim. But it’s more we’re telling of all of this is preparatory, in terms of improvements to the gateway et cetera that is all being done in anticipation of availing themselves of Iridium NEXT. And we think that goes really well for another long-term contract.

Yes, just following up on that, as you know, engineering and support business we’re in, we do it well. I think we have a great history of high quality, timely delivery of -- to commitments that we make, but really we do that on behalf of creating new products and driving service revenue and doing all the other things we do as a network operator.

And next question comes from Andrew Spinola from Wells Fargo.

Hey Tom, the CapEx this quarter was about only 10% of your annual guide. If everything goes to plan, what would be the trend of CapEx through the rest of the year?

So, I think we’re out there with CapEx of approximately 700. We’re keeping eye on that. That’s going to be timing related. If it pushes into next year, it’s all milestone-driven. You have to hit a milestone before you pay them and we’re keeping an eye on it, Andrew.

And we have no further questions at this time.

Okay, great. Thanks everybody for joining us. See you next quarter. Have a good spring. Thanks.