Welcome to ITT's 2024 Third Quarter Conference Call. Today is Tuesday, October 29, 2024. Today's call is being recorded and will be available for replay beginning at 12:00 p.m. Eastern Time. At this time, all participants have been placed in a listen-only mode and the floor will be opened for your questions following the presentation. [Operator Instructions] It is now my pleasure to turn the floor over to Mark Macaluso, Vice President, Investor Relations and Global Communications. You may begin.

Thank you, Gigi and good morning. Joining me this morning in Stanford are Luca Savi, ITT's, Chief Executive Officer and President; and Emmanuel Caprais, Chief Financial Officer. Today's call will cover ITT's financial results for the three-month period ending September 28, 2024, which we announced this morning. Before we begin, please refer to Slide 2 of today's presentation, where we note that today's comments include forward-looking statements that are based on our current expectations. Actual results may differ materially due to several risks and uncertainties, including those described in our 2023 annual report on Form 10-K and other recent SEC filings. Except for otherwise noted, the third quarter results we presented this morning will be compared to the third quarter of 2023 and include certain non-GAAP financial measures. The reconciliation of such measures to most comparable GAAP figures are detailed in our earnings release and in the appendix of our presentation, both of which are available on our website. With that, it's now my pleasure to turn the call over to Luca, who will begin on Slide 3.

Thank you, Mark and good morning. I would like to begin by thanking all ITT-iers for another exceptional performance in the third quarter. Once again, our teams delivered strong profitable growth with even more robust growth in orders. First, in our legacy business, we continue to drive value creation through outsized organic growth and margin expansion, with an operating margin above our long-term target nearly two years ahead of schedule. And whilst we continue to drive profitable growth in the core, we are also building the M&A muscle through strategic capital deployment. We are seeing strong results from our recent acquisitions Svanehøj, while early indications on kSARIA value proposition are encouraging. I want to thank our teams once again for over delivering on our commitments. Let's now discuss a few highlights from Q3. We grew orders 14% on an organic basis and importantly, 6% sequentially versus Q2. Our book-to-bill of 1.1 resulted in a record ending backlog of $1.7 billion. This is even more impressive given that organic revenue grew 6% with all segments contributing. We also drove 60 basis points of margin expansion or 100 basis points excluding M&A impacts. All in, we delivered 7% adjusted EPS growth and 9% when excluding the impact of the Wolverine divestiture. Excluding the temporary acquisition amortization, we are driving to more than $6 of earnings in 2024. A truly strong performance compounded by the $1 billion of capital deployed. With kSARIA closed, we have now deployed over four times more capital than we did in the corresponding period in 2023 and more than two times our expected free cash flow. Let's get into the details on our Q3. Our orders growth in the third quarter was a standout. IP grew orders 30%, with pump project growth well above 100% for the quarter.…

Thank you, Luca, and good morning. Let's begin with revenue. Volume once again drove most of the growth this quarter with all segments contributing. In IP, we saw strong growth across baseline pumps as well as parts service and valves, while project sales were flat. Habonim was a standout this quarter, with 16% revenue growth. Svanehøj also added 14 points to IP's total growth. In CCT, Defense share gains Connectors and Aero aftermarket growth drove a 6% revenue increase. CCT is continuing the multi-quarter recovery in Connectors distribution at attractive margins. Additionally, we are overcoming a slowdown in order activity from Boeing given the production stoppage and elevated inventory level. In MT, revenue grew 5% driven by strength in rail and the Friction aftermarket. On the OE side, Friction outperformed global auto production by over 700 basis points. Additionally, KONI grew 16% and expects to grow roughly 15% for the full year due to share gains. On profitability, margin expansion was primarily driven by higher volume and productivity, particularly in MT, which grew more than 100 basis points, despite 160 basis points of FX headwinds. CCT exceeded 19% margin with 90 basis points of margin expansion, overcoming 40 basis points of dilution from kSARIA, which closed in September. And in IP, excluding the 300 basis points of dilution from Svanehøj, margin grew 60 basis points to 23.9%. For all of ITT price, operational leverage and productivity outpaced unfavorable impacts from foreign currency of 80 basis points. On earnings, we delivered a strong performance, driven by core volume growth and margin expansion. This is ITT's DNA. Lastly, on capital deployment. Beyond Svanehøj and kSARIA, we continue to cultivate a rich actionable pipeline of targets in flow and Connectors, while also putting the balance sheet to work on other capital deployment priorities.…

Thank you, Emmanuel. A few points before Q&A. This quarter once again we delivered value creation through organic growth and margin expansion. This is ITT's DNA. Our execution and innovation are delivering share gains across all our businesses to a record backlog ahead of 2025. On top of this, we continue to build our M&A muscle. Svanehøj is already delivering, kSARIA early signs are good and our M&A pipeline remains active. And thanks to our team's performance, we're once again raising our outlook. As always, it has been my pleasure. Thank you for your continued support and interest in ITT. Gigi, please open the line for Q&A.

Thank you. The floor is now open for questions. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Joe Giordano from TD Cowen.

Hey, good morning, guys.

Good morning, Joe.

Good morning, Joe.

Hey, I'm just curious maybe this is a little bit more on IP but I guess it could be broad. Like how reflective do you think your results are of the underlying conditions in the market that you're operating in? Because we're hearing some kind of mix about push outs of projects and even in industries like process, where we think things are generally pretty good, we're hearing some mix kind of color and clearly that's not what's happening in your results here. So can you maybe compare what you're seeing in your order book versus like what underlying conditions on the ground might look like?

Sure. I think that what you're seeing here Joe in the results is the differentiation of ITT, when it comes particularly on the performance side. So if you think of IP, the example that we gave of our Saudi operations. In Q3, they delivered 100% on-time delivery good quality products. And this is the reason why we continue to win market share on the project side. And this year, year-to-date, we are 10% up versus last year that was already a very tough compare. The story is the same when it comes to rail in China or in Europe and North America, Friction and also on the Connector side, particularly on Defense.

And Joe, if I can add, if you look at our orders, they grow on all the different end markets. So the 30% growth from a total order – from an organic order standpoint is driven by really by all the markets. So we're really outperforming with every customer in all end markets.

Fair enough. And then just curious on M&A, right? So you've done the Wolverine divestment, you've made two deals here. You've mentioned that the pipeline looks good. How interested are you in terms of like timing, right? Like you have a lot going on, you're executing well but like how much is too much in a short period of time like internally from a bandwidth standpoint. And if I can just tack on one Emmanuel just on the – I'll nit pick a tiny bit on the free cash flow. Like can you maybe give us the nuances there? You're kind of raising the core in revenue and EPS but the free cash flow guide kind of unchanged there. So if you could just address that. Thanks, guys.

Thank you, Joe. So when we talk about the M&A, the pipeline is active, we are cultivating. We are active on the M&A front. And the reason is because when you look at the last two acquisitions for example Joe, Svanehøj and also kSARIA, they are well-performing companies with a good position in the market and a strong management team. If you look about Søren and Johnny Morten and all the team at Svanehøj is really doing a great job and focusing and overdelivering. kSARIA, it's early signs are good and we have a strong management team there with Mike leading kSARIA. So we have room to do more acquisitions, but it depends of course.

And on the free cash flow question, Joe. So for sure free cash flow was a little bit frustrating this quarter. We didn't hit what we wanted to do. And the reason for this is because working capital and specifically AR and inventory. So I think what you're seeing here is the fact that from a timing standpoint it takes us a little bit more time to reduce the inventory than we were expecting and that's why you're not seeing free cash flow going up at the same time as earnings.

Thanks, guys.

Thanks, Joe.

Thanks, Joe.

Thank you. One moment for our next question. Our next question comes from the line of Scott Davis from Melius.

Hi. Good morning, guys.

Good morning.

And congrats again on what's been a great year. Guys when you see numbers like 136% growth in pump projects -- we've had some other companies just comment that purchasing patterns have changed a little bit on the project side where things are -- orders are coming in a little earlier than maybe historically they have. And have you guys seen -- I mean when you again just kind of in reference to such a big number are folks -- are the EPCs kind of racing to get ahead of each other and making sure they get orders in? Are there some concerns about shortages of product out there? Or am I -- is that not relevant for you guys?

No, I wouldn't say so Scott. I think that because of the project sometimes you have a little bit ups and downs. So this is the reason why for example we emphasized a 10% project growth year-to-date on what was already an exceptional year last year because probably that is a little bit more relevant. What we have seen in the way that the EPC are working is that if you are delivering well if you're working well with the EPC they tend to work now probably a little bit more in partnership with you. And this is what is differentiated now there in the market. So maybe a little bit more working closely together particularly if you're working well and if you're delivering well for them.

Okay. That's helpful. And then when you think about the ebbs and flows of what's going on at Boeing right now. I mean it's not just as a customer you have to manage this disruption but also I know you guys are in the middle of renegotiating or negotiating your contract moving forward. What -- how do you manage your production around this uncertainty? And does this push back that negotiation at all? Just a little update on Boeing would be helpful.

Thanks, Scott. First of all, we are working closely to ensure that we support them when they're going to restart the production. And it's not going to be a smooth restart because every single time you got one of these events it takes a little bit of time. So we have to stay super close with them so that when they start we will be able to support them. When it comes to the -- we're not shipping anything today just to give you an idea and these will have probably an impact in the Q4 of roughly $10 million for CCT and when it comes to the negotiation, the negotiation has to happen because some of these contracts have an expiry date at the end of the year and at the end of Q1 2025. So the negotiations are happening still today.

Okay. That’s helpful. I will pass it on. Thank you guys. Best of luck.

Thanks, Scott.

Thanks, Scott.

Thank you. One moment for our next question. Our next question comes from the line of Andrew Obin from Bank of America.

Hi, guys. Good morning. Just a question on pricing. It's been a large focus in recent years and seems that it's really improved. Can you talk about structurally what you've done what other workers to do going forward? And early thoughts on pricing into 2025.

Sure. The pricing is different for the different businesses. I would say when you look specifically at 2024 and in Q3 where price cost the positive both when it comes to dollars and when it comes also to margin. The situation is particularly positive on the CCT front and here is working strategically looking at both at the pricing into the distribution, but also in the renegotiation of the long-term agreements. On the MT side, what we have done structurally is ensuring that all the contracts now we've got commodities indexed. And so that we -- this is covering both for us as well as giving some security for the customers as well. And then on the IP side, on the short cycle in the distribution, we have been very active in terms of looking at our discount rates and our leakage to ensure that we do not have any leakage there when it comes to pricing. In the future, the second part of your question, we probably need to be even more strategic. So being even more analytical looking at, okay, if you look at this pump, this application in this region for this distributor, what is the value that we're delivering and the price that we can get. So more analytics to be able to get a little bit more pricing, but it's more normalized.

All right. Got you. Thank you. And just to follow-up, you sort of noted short-cycle business. It seems yours continues to hold up well. Just what's the balance between share? And could you just give us some color as to what are you seeing on the distributors? Are they turning more positive on the short cycle?

Yes. So thanks, Andrew. So if you look at -- if you split it, if you look at valves, this is clearly an area where we're gaining share. And here, our orders in Q3 were up 16%. The majority was volume and we're gaining share both on large projects, like the medication projects in our engineering valves as well as on the short cycle. Short cycle, including the aftermarket for valves has been pretty strong. Service -- pump service, so repairs is also doing really, really well. And I think here, because we're focused on reducing as much as possible the machine downtime at our customers, we're able to reduce our lead times and ship back the pump -- the repair pump to our customers faster. And I think that drives a lot of volume into our shops. And then if you think about the aftermarket parts, here, the focus has been to really the turnaround -- to really improve the turnaround times. And if you think about what our distribution center for aftermarket parts in the U.S. is doing, they're able to deliver roughly 50% of the orders in a one-day turnaround and then 95% of those orders in two-day turnaround. So again, here, you win the battle in aftermarket if you have the part available for your customer when they require.

And just in terms of destock, are we done? What's the message? Sorry, if I missed it.

So in IP, we are not seeing any signs of destocking. Inventories are not also historically higher than they used to be. I think it's hard to say on the Connector side because inventories are higher than what they were historically, and we haven't seen any type of decline. What we saw, though, that is interesting is that point of sale continues to increase. So there may be a rerating of the inventory levels at our distributors.

Thanks very much.

Thanks, Andrew.

Thank you. One moment for our next question. Our next question comes from the line of Mike Halloran from Baird.

Hey, good morning everyone.

Hi, Mike.

Why don't we just start with the auto outlook? I mean, obviously, choppy trends depending on the region, how you're thinking about it for the remaining of the year, but more importantly, what's the best guess at this point for what industry demand looks like as we head into 2025?

Sure. Sure. The market is challenging, particularly when you look at the end market, but what is interesting to see here is that we continue to outperform in every single market. This is in Europe, is in China where the outperformance was almost 1,000 basis points and in North America, where we performed incredibly well as well. So despite the fact that the market will be down in 2024, we are supposed to grow. And our outperformance for the full year is probably going to be around 700 basis points. Now when you look at 2025, it's a little bit early, but probably, we expect the market to be flat to up low single digits and because of the awards that we won in the past and the awards that we continue to win in 2024, we expect an outperformance in 2025 as well. The outperformance, Mike, is not only in every single region, but it's also in every single power trade. Despite the fact that internal combustion engine production is coming down, we are growing there. And our market share will be above 30% in total worldwide for the very first time this year.

Makes sense. And then just on the guide, could you just help me understand the impact of kSARIA in the fourth quarter, specifically on a net basis, both the operational piece as well as, obviously, you've got some step-up amortization type things in the numbers. So just maybe net that out for me so I understand how that's impacting the guide?

Sure. So if you look at our fourth quarter, definitely, the orders momentum, the positive momentum will continue. And a lot of growth will be driven by IP, which still be in the double-digits. From a revenue standpoint, think about it as the highest quarter of 2024 from a dollar revenue standpoint, and that is pretty typical. So really good performance and the teams are getting ready to ramp up those shipments. IP will be driving a lot of that organic growth, thanks to projects. In total, with Svanehoj and kSARIA, revenue will be up 12% -- and then CCT, as we said, will be flat as we're trying to overcome the impact from Boeing. We expect in our guidance that volumes will not restart meaningfully in Q4. And so that represents $10 million that was included in our guidance from a revenue standpoint. And then from a margin -- yeah, go ahead.

No, no, please continue.

I was just going to say from a margin standpoint really quickly, in line with Q3, the FX impacts that we saw, namely in MT that really impacted our margins by 160 basis points in Q3. We don't expect that in Q4. We expect a sequential improvement in MT as a result. And then CCT will step down because we will be impacted roughly 400 basis points by the kSARIA dilution.

So that was a far more interesting answer than the question I asked. I was just looking for kSARIA impact, but that was a lot of really great detail. So could you just net out the kSARIA piece because I know that was included this time around.

So kSARIA, you're right, was accretive in Q3. I think when you think about Q4, we expect kSARIA to modestly contribute from an income standpoint. And then revenue for kSARIA in Q4 will be around $50 million.

Thank you. Appreciate it.

Thanks, Mike.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Vlad Bystricky from Citigroup.

Good morning, Vlad.

Good morning, guys. Thanks for taking my call, and congrats on another nice quarter. I guess just stepping back, given the margin performance you're putting up across the portfolio, and you mentioned you're essentially performing at or above your longer-term targets on the legacy businesses. So can you just talk about how you're thinking about the path for margins going forward into 2025 and as we think out beyond 2025 at this point?

Yeah. So first of all, let me say that most likely in the first half of 2025, we'll come out with new margin targets for all our businesses. So if we think about the margin on the legacy businesses, we expect in 2025 broadly to continue to improve. Think about -- the way to think about it is that, as Luca said, friction will continue to outperform. And with that outperformance, we get a lot of benefits from a bottom line standpoint. We -- IP will start shipping some of those large projects that we've been developing and that are really profitable. Again, our backlog for project, the margin in the backlog was up several hundred basis points versus the prior year. And then think about also the Boeing price renegotiations, potentially the restart of some of the volumes, real share gains. That's a really positive top line environment that will drive also bottom line improvement.

Okay, that's helpful color Emmanuel. Appreciate it. And maybe just following up on that comment around the project margins and the margin in backlog. Can you just talk about the $50 million in awards for Amiral. Can you talk about sort of the visibility to timing on the delivery of those? And would you say that's that particular win is consistent with that commentary around higher margins and backlog?

Sure. Vlad, this is Luca. I think that this $50 million is working across different EPCs. And the reason for these good wins is exactly the performance of the Saudi team. Because of the performance we've been able to work very closely with the EPCs and supporting them. And I think that because of the localization because of the way that we perform these projects will be good profitable projects. When you look at the timeline of projects of this size, you are looking at for the next two years -- two to three years. This is when you will be able to recognize the revenue.

Great. That’s all. I appreciate it.

Another example of that. So, for instance, the businesses the decarb business that we won in Q1 and Q2 of last year, we will start shipping them in the first half of 2025. So, those large projects take a little bit of time between definition of specification development delivery and then documentation.

Yes, that makes sense. Appreciate it guys. I'll be back in queue.

Thanks Vlad.

Thanks Vlad.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Damian Karas from UBS.

Morning Damian.

Hey, good morning. Nice work in the quarter.

Thank you.

Thank you.

I wanted to ask you guys a follow-up on Friction seeing continued share gains and strength there particularly in China. But kind of under the hood, just curious how things are progressing with the high-performance pads, kind of, a newer area of the business? And how are you thinking about the potential to expand your aftermarket presence in other regions like China? I know that's something you've been looking into and testing.

Sure. So, the market share gains are across the board. And we said across all the different regions. So, the teams around the world are really working very well closely with the customer with R&D. And on top of that, their performance in terms of on-time delivery and quality in the PPBs in hundreds of parts per billions makes the difference. So, this is for across the board. For high-performance, specifically, funny you asked because in October this month at the beginning of October, we were there together with ITT's Board of Directors. They approved this investment. So, it was only natural to take the Board of Directors there to see what we have done. Think about this speed Damian. We broke ground or I will say in Italian, we put the first stone down in the summer of 2023. And in less than 15 months, we got the permit. The building is completed is up and running. The machines are being delivered and installed right now, starting our operation the SOP in Q1 of 2025. We have won the right and the targeted platform. So, the team internally has done an outstanding job at an incredible speed. And I'd say we also received a lot of support from the local authorities and institutions. So, that is for high performance. So, good picture there. For the aftermarket, it's true that we are testing a little bit of the aftermarket in China. But I would say as we stand today, we got opportunity to grow on the OE side and grow profitably around the world. So, for the aftermarket, right now, we are sticking with the European geography only.

Got it. That makes sense. Thank you. And then on the Connectors business, it sounded like order strength was pretty broad-based. Maybe you could just elaborate on what you're seeing across Connectors and your sense for how much of that growth you're experiencing is underlying market versus ITT share gains?

Sure. Connectors been a great story. To be honest with you, I would say that connector has been a great story for the last couple of years. So that's shown good resilience despite the challenges that was out there in the market. I think that I was -- in August I was in China. So I was able to visit Shenzhen, which is our factory of the connectors where we have the factory for connectors there. We are small in China. But the team Sergio and the team are really localizing our engineering the development and we're winning share there across the board with the market. So we are more and more in China for China. And we've got a very good position particularly on the medical side. But we have good performance on the industrial side. Our connectors industrial were up 21% in the quarter and also defense. In defense we are really winning market share thanks to our product expansion but also the -- what Dan Arthur and the team are doing in terms of speed to market. How we are able to come up with the right solution for that program and be specified for that program. So very strong in defense as well.

Glad to hear. Thanks again. Good luck guys.

Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Joe Ritchie from Goldman Sachs.

Good morning, Joe.

Hey, good morning guys. So we've long talked about the market share story for the Friction business. You guys went into some detail on the pumps business earlier. It just seems like you're just seeing share gains really across the portfolio. And I was hoping that maybe you could dive in a little bit further on the rail business and the aerospace and defense business. What you're doing there? And maybe if there's a way to describe what the opportunity is across those businesses that would be helpful as well.

Sure. When you look at rail, KONI is performing exceptionally well in rail for our customers. Their on-time delivery is similar to Friction is in the 90s very good quality providing good service engineering very close to the customers. We are in China for China and as an example and this enables us to work very closely with the customer. I remember when Davide went to China the very first time we had zero market share on high speed train. You're talking about 10 years ago. Today we are one of the leaders in high-speed train and our shock absorbers are tested on their new 400, 450-kilometer per hour high-speed trade for the future, so all of that is feeding growth. There is plenty of opportunity in the market because of the investment in Europe as well as the investment in North America. Rail we benefit from the green trend of the future, so good market and outperformance on top of it. When it comes to defense, defense has been a very good story both from a revenue perspective and orders. Other revenue for the full year probably will grow 20% in defense and the orders 25%. Here we have been working very closely with the customer from an engineering point of view in customized, in the solution and has brought results our speed and our engineering both for the connectors as well as for the CT side.

Super helpful, Luca. I appreciate all the color. And then I guess just a more near-term question Emmanuel just talking about MT margins. You said you had a very big headwind this quarter from FX, still expecting 18-plus percent margins for the year. I guess, maybe as we head into 2025 any initial comments on where margins could go if we cut the line today on FX and say that's potentially not as much of a headwind next year. How are we looking for MT margins next year?

Yeah, Joe. So we expect FX not to be an impact already in Q4. And really when you think about the 160 basis points margin impact in Q3 that was due to our FX hedge that we -- balance sheet position that we had to unwind because the dollar became stronger compared to the euro. So this is a one-off impact and we don't think it's going to repeat in that magnitude in the future. So, when you think about Q4, we expect already MT to be sequentially up versus Q3 and contributing to MT being for the full year above 18%. Now when you think about 2025, obviously, we continue to drive a lot of productivity, a lot of cost reduction and then so, I think it's logical to assume that MT will grow margins in 2025 compared to this year. For us, what's really important is the long-term target. And you know that the long-term target is 20%. Our commitment is to achieve it by 2026 which implies that there's going to be significant progress also in 2025 because we are -- we will be a little bit above 18% at the end of 2024. So we feel good about MT. We feel good of our opportunity to expand margins. And yes.

Perfect. Thank you, guys.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Nathan Jones from Stifel.

Good morning everyone. Firstly a follow-up question on the profitability of large IP projects that Emmanuel I think you mentioned. I think you called them highly profitable. And historically the larger projects have been less profitable. Maybe just some more colors and more commentary on what's leading those larger projects to have much higher profitability than they may have historically?

Yes. So keep a mind why I call them highly profitable is because when you think about our legacy IP business this quarter, we were at 23.9%. And so it's true that aftermarket is super profitable, but at some point in time projects need to contribute as well. And so that's what you're seeing also you're seeing that as we're taking projects at a certain margin level, we work through the development cycle and the production process to improve that margin so that the margin when we deliver is higher than the margin when we were awarded. And so that's what's happening. So here specifically what we're doing is that, we're working in really close collaboration with our customers in order to really define specification. So that there's no room for air. Once we do this, we are focused on making sure that we develop flawlessly those projects. We also include engineering changes that our customers are requesting and this is a big difference from the past because in the past because -- and I'm talking 2015, because our performance in developing project wasn't great, we were in a lot of cases eating those engineering changes. Now we are pricing those engineering changes and making sure that we recover margin on this as well. And then when you think about the delivery, it's all about customer service, making sure that we provide the documentation also because, when you deliver a pump without the documentation the customer can't do anything with it. And so it's really a positive cycle that we've been able to implement with our customers that is resulting in growth feeding growth.

But it's early to say that the projects tend to be a little bit more challenging. So you need always to maintain the rigor in other acquisitions. So hat you really bring in the orders at the right profitability and then the rigor in execution.

Makes sense. And then I guess my follow-up question is around strategic pricing. Luca you talked earlier about -- earlier on the call about needing to elevate your game even further on strategic pricing. Can you talk about where you think the biggest areas to implement more value-based pricing to target those pricing increases come from? And what impact that could have to margins?

Yes. I think that that probably is on the CCT side and specifically, on Aero on the component side. I think that this is the area where probably we can be even more strategic and we can have even bigger impacts. And I'm not just talking about the long-term agreement that we discussed already in the past but in general, I think that there are opportunities there when it comes to the aftermarket and when it comes to some of the components in CCT, the repairs, for example. So those -- this is the area where we've got more opportunities.

Awesome. Thanks a lot.

And here, if I could just add Nathan, I think the team has been doing a really good job at reducing the lead times for those repairs. And so that's why we've been getting much more volume, and we've been also able to extract pricing, because every day that -- when you get a repair every day that passes, it's an airplane that's on the ground, not flying. And so, here this is a really a differentiation that we've been really focused on developing so that we can grow this business even more.

Awesome. Thanks very much for taking my questions.

Thanks Nathan.

Thank you. Our last question comes from the line of Matt Summerville from D.A. Davidson Co.

Good morning, Matt.

Good morning. Just a couple of quick ones. Obviously, Friction aftermarket has had some pretty nice growth, in particular, this last quarter up high-single-digits. How do you view kind of the growth trajectory of that business kind of going forward into 2025? And what's your assessment on customer inventory levels there? And then, I have another quick follow-up.

So, when you look at the aftermarket, I would say on a year-to-date basis, it's growing 6%. I would say, the OES is practically flat and the independent aftermarket is in the high teens. So, I would say in -- when it comes to the 2025 or the near-term, we will expect a more normalized growth, when it comes to independent aftermarket and probably more opportunities on the OES side. When it comes to the inventory, I think that the destocking, I think has been completely overcome. So we are beyond that.

And then just lastly on the project side of the business, can you talk about -- you've referenced in the past Luca funnel metrics that you track in that business. Can you sort of maybe provide an update as to the go-forward funnel as you see it for IP projects and maybe add a little bit of end market and geographic color to that funnel? Thank you.

Sure. The funnel is staying at a very high level, Matt. The funnel is up despite the fact that we have a good growth in revenue. And on top of that a book-to-bill, which is above 1, the funnel is up 9% year-over-year. So, pretty outstanding, which tells you a little bit how rich the opportunities out there. When you look at the region specifically and the market, it's fair to say that there are good opportunities on the green side, a lot of opportunities on the traditional oil and gas. And the -- from a geographic point of view, the regions that continue to present good growth are Middle East and Asia Pacific. And we expect those areas to continue to provide good opportunities and good orders in the future.

Thanks Luca.

Thank you, Matt.

Thank you. This does conclude today's conference. Please disconnect your lines at this time and have a wonderful day.