Welcome to the Jazz Pharmaceuticals Plc First Quarter 2017 Earnings Conference Call. Following an introduction from the company, we will open the call to questions. I will now turn the call over to Kathy Littrell, Head of Investor Relations at Jazz Pharmaceuticals.

Thank you for joining our Investor [Technical Difficulty] (0:22-0:27). Today we reported our first quarter...

Hang on a second, we're experiencing technical difficulties.

Okay.

Okay. Kathy, try it again.

Thank you, Shunal and thank you for joining us today for our investor call. Today, we reported our first quarter 2017 financial results and updated financial guidance in a press release. The release and slide presentation accompanying this call are available in the Investors section of our website. With me for today's call are Bruce Cozadd, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; Matt Young, our Chief Financial Officer; Russ Cox, our Chief Operating Officer; Mike Miller, our Executive Vice President [Technical Difficulty] (1:10-1:47) future inventory and supply challenges ongoing and future clinical trials, and other product development and regulatory activities, and the timing of such events and activities. These forward [audio gap] (2:00) that could cause actual events, performance and results to differ materially. These risks and uncertainties are identified and [audio gap] (2:09-2:38) SG&A and R&D expenses. We believe these non-GAAP financial measures are helpful in understanding our past financial performance and potential future results. They are not meant to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for comparable reported GAAP measures. Reconciliations of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures discussed on this call are included in today's press release and slide presentation both of which are posted in the Investors section (3:07-3:48)

Post-stem cell transplantation. (3:52-6:37)

Ladies and gentlemen, please stand by. Your conference call will resume momentarily. Again please stand by your conference call will resume momentarily. Thank you. [Music] (6:55-12:06)

Hi everyone, welcome to the call, sorry we've had a little technical difficulty here. But, thank you for joining our investor call today. Today, we reported our first quarter's 2017 financial results and updated financial guidance in a press release. The release and the slide presentation accompanying this call are available in the Investors section of our website. With me for today's call are Bruce Cozadd, Chairman and CEO; Matt Young, Chief Financial Officer; Russ Cox, Chief Operating Officer; Mike Miller, Executive Vice President of U.S. Commercial; and Karen Smith, our Executive Vice President Global Head of R&D and Chief Medical Officer. Following some remarks, we'll open the call for your questions. I'd like to remind you that some of the statements we will make on this call relate to future events and future performance rather than historical facts, and are forward-looking statements. Examples of forward-looking statements include statements related to our 2017 financial guidance and goals, potential FDA and, approval and launch of Vyxeos, our corporate development efforts, our growth strategy, future product sales and volumes, future litigation and intellectual property-related events, future inventory and supply challenges, ongoing and future clinical trials, and other product development and regulatory activities, and the timing of such events and activity. These forward-looking statements involve numerous risks and uncertainties that could cause actual events, performance, and results to differ materially. These risks and uncertainties are identified and described in today's press release, the slide presentation accompanying this call and under risk factors in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 and our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017, which we will file shortly. We undertake no duty or obligation to update any forward-looking statements we make today. On this call, we will discuss several historical and expected non-GAAP financial measures, including adjusted net income and related per share measures, and adjusted SG&A and R&D expenses. We believe these non-GAAP financial measures are helpful in understanding our past financial performance and potential future results. They are not meant to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for comparable reported GAAP measures. Reconciliation to – of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures discussed on this call are included in today's press release and slide presentation, both of which are posted in the Investors section of our website. I'll now turn the call over to Bruce.

Thank you, Kathy, and good afternoon, everyone. Thanks especially for your patience. For those of you who are still on the call 21 minutes in, we've got a lot to cover, so we'll get right to it. We've had a busy and productive start to the year. We began enrolling patients in multiple clinical studies, a Phase 3 study of JZP-258, evaluating cataplexy and excessive daytime sleepiness in narcolepsy patients. A Phase 3 study of defibrotide for the prevention of veno-occlusive disease or VOD in high risk and very high risk patients post-stem cell transplantation; and a Phase 2 study of JZP-110 evaluating excessive sleepiness associated with Parkinson's disease. We also completed the Rolling NDA Submission for Vyxeos at the end of March. We announced positive top line data for JZP-110 evaluating excessive sleepiness in both obstructive sleep apnea or OSA, and narcolepsy. We announced positive top line data for the Xyrem study evaluating cataplexy in pediatric narcolepsy patients ages seven to 17 and we settled the Xyrem patent litigation with Hikma, the first ANDA filer for a generic sodium oxybate product, which we believe was positive for our business and sleep franchise. I'll now provide an update on key commercial legal, regulatory, and clinical development activities, and highlight some key events that we expect in 2017. I'll then turn the call over to Matt to review our financial results for the quarter, and provide updated financial guidance. In our sleep therapeutic area, Xyrem delivered 9% sales growth during the first quarter. First quarter bottle volume growth for Xyrem was 1% compared with the same period in 2016. The average number of active Xyrem patients was 12,925 in the first quarter of 2017. The volume growth for Xyrem was negatively impacted by a decrease in government pay patients in the…

Thanks Bruce and good afternoon everyone. Our first quarter 2017 revenues increased 12% driven primarily by higher sales of Xyrem and Defitelio compared to the first quarter of 2016. Net sales of Xyrem for the quarter were $272 million, up 9% from $250 million in the first quarter of last year. As Bruce mentioned, Xyrem net sales were impacted by fewer government pay patients during the quarter compared to the same period of 2016, as well as the typical first quarter payer churn. We are updating our guidance range for Xyrem net product sales for 2017 to $1.2 billion to $1.23 billion from a previous range of $1.22 billion to $1.25 billion, and now expect volume growth in the low-to-mid single digit range for 2017. Turning to Erwinase, first quarter net sales in both 2017 and 2016 were $51 million. In the first quarter of 2017, we continued to experience supply challenges which at times led to our inability to supply certain markets and resulted in fluctuations in inventory level. As we continue to experience supply challenges, the timing of supply disruptions and resupply to the market can result in intra-quarter variability in Erwinase net product sales. We are maintaining our guidance for Erwinase net sales for 2017 in the range of $205 million to $225 million. Worldwide Defitelio net sales were $36 million in the first quarter, an increase of $18 million compared to the first quarter of 2016. The increase in Defitelio net sales was primarily driven by the April 2016 launch of Defitelio in the U.S. In the first quarter of 2017, U.S. sales were $12 million and the rest of the world net sales increased by $6 million compares to the same period in 2016. As a reminder, VOD is an ultra rare disease and we…

Thanks, Matt. We request that you limit your questions to one at a time and then feel free to jump back into the queue, if you have further questions. With that said, I'm going to turn the call back to the operator so we can open the lines now for your questions. Operator?

And our first question comes from the line of Annabel Samimy of Stifel. Your line is now open. Annabel Samimy - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc.: Hi. Thanks for taking my question. I'd like to ask you a question on Vyxeos. Clearly you're excited about this opportunity and optimistic about the FDA outcome because you've included sales in your guidance, which I guess is uncharacteristically aggressive for you. So maybe you can tell us what kind of preparations you're doing right now, talks that you've had with physicians and the community, any educational efforts, and what kind of feedback are you hearing that gets you so excited about the opportunity that you'd be willing to put guidance, Vyxeos guidance, right now. Thanks.

Yeah. So, a couple of comments at a high level, and then maybe I can turn it over to Mike Miller a little bit more for physician commentary. In terms of being ready for a launch, with Breakthrough Therapy designation, we believe this is a high priority for FDA as well as for us to try to get this product to patients. Obviously with an overall survival benefit in a very tough to treat condition, this represents we think a real advance for AML patients. At a high level I would say our preparations for the launch began when we reconfigured our U.S. field force effective at the beginning of the year to bring on additional adult hem/onc specialists. Obviously before Vyxeos approval, they can be helpful to us with our existing portfolio, particularly with the adult focus on Defitelio. So that has an immediate impact on our business that I think we're already seeing, but also positions us well to be ready to go with Vyxeos when we need to be. Mike?

Yeah, Bruce. We're very excited about Vyxeos. Clearly, the data is very compelling to clinicians. We have already begun much of the training of the sales force. Our launch planning is basically complete. At this point, we've done a lot of work on our (32:49) and economic value, and then as Bruce said the targeting and the profiling is well underway. So, we feel very good about it. As far as our objectives, we really want to establish Vyxeos as the standard of care for induction for oral eligible first line AML and maintain the continuum of care through consolidation. And the most important aspect is to ensure patient access. Annabel Samimy - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc.: Okay. Thank you.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Gary Nachman of BMO Capital Markets. Your line is now open.

Hi. What initiatives are you focused on to try and improve volume growth for Xyrem, which I guess is coming in a little lower than expected. Would more DTCs potentially help? And now that you've settled with Hikma, how will you be managing development of the low sodium forms of Xyrem? Does anything change in terms of when you would want to potentially bring those to market? Thanks.

Mike, why don't you to start with the Xyrem...

Sure.

...growth initiatives.

Sure. So, we have a couple underway and Bruce mentioned them. First on the awareness campaign, we feel very good about the awareness campaign. We've generated about 70,000 screened patients online in the quarter. We've also driven about 10,000 patients to our specialist finder online. We've seen type 1 diagnosis go up in 2016 about 7.5%. So, we feel good about that. So, we did mention on the – the commercial pay, which is a large majority of our business. We feel very good about the approval rate around 80%. And what I especially like is our field reimbursement folks have been really making a difference. In fact, we are going to expand that team. We saw the electronic prior authorization rate jumped to about 62%, which was really a product of them educating offices around how to help patients get access to Xyrem. So, we feel very good about it.

And Gary, on the second part of your question, we remain interested in pursuing both of the low sodium versions of oxybate JZP-507 and JZP-258. Those two programs have different characteristics. JZP-258 would represent a greater, significantly greater reduction in sodium load and I think that would be a real benefit to patients, but of course that program has additional risk, because we're in a Phase 3 trial that started accruing in the first quarter of this year. We need to finish that trial, we need to see the results, but I think, at this point, having both programs going gives us the most options for us and for patients, in terms of determining specifics of how and when we'd launch those products, let's wait and see what the data looks like, and how that process plays out before we talk specifics on that.

Okay. Thanks.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Bill Tanner of Cantor Fitzgerald. Your line is now open.

Thanks for taking the question. I had one, maybe it's for Mike, as it relates to JZP-110 for OSA. I don't know if you guys have talked much about the commercial strategy if you have, I apologize, I've forgotten it, but just thinking about, say launching it in the latter part of next year. I'm assuming that for narcolepsy, you're going to be able to leverage the existing sales force, but maybe if you could speak a little bit to how you would contemplate targeting the OSA market? And then one other one maybe it's for Karen, just curious if there are any DDI interactions to be mindful of, just as you're thinking about going into PD?

So, let me take the first half of that, which is around looking at how we would launch JZP-110. We're very excited about this. Clearly, narcolepsy lines up very nicely with our current sales configuration, sales force configuration, but OSA will likely include other specialties. We have not announced what – how that spreads out across different specialties, but obvious ones will be pulmonologists, that would be certainly one that we would look at. But I think, as we go forward, we'll be looking at all of this. We're just elated with the clinical study results.

And for the second part of our question around DDI, I don't think we've said that much so far, but Karen, maybe you could say a word or two.

I mean, we haven't said a great deal about that. We do know that JZP-110 is excreted predominantly through the kidneys, so there are no known PK drug-drug interactions and obviously that is going to provide a better view from a physician standpoint than a drug that is liver metabolized, which is the majority of drugs that are used today to treat excessive sleepiness. With respect to Parkinson's as you mentioned obviously, we would want to see what concomitant meds the patient is on and as you know a lot of the medications that are used to treat Parkinson's patients do have an effect on dopamine and so as JZP-110 is a DNRI then we would want to take that into consideration, so we'll be doing post part at the clinical trial.

Okay. All right. Thanks very much.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Liav Abraham of Citi. Your line is now open.

Good afternoon. I'm curious if there are any changes to your thoughts on business development and M&A following the settlement with Hikma and the guarantee you've received on Xyrem. In particular is there any change to how you're thinking about the size of potential acquisitions, the extent to which you would consider new therapeutic areas. The urgency of doing deals. Any additional color would be helpful. Thank you.

Yeah, we have – maybe I'll start with a couple of broad comments and then ask Matt to talk about the current landscape and how we're thinking about it. We already saw many opportunities to broaden our commercial and our development pipeline through corp dev. We've been doing a couple of transactions a year on average, and have been very pleased with how those transactions have performed in the time since we've completed them. So, I think, our general mindset was and remains that there are some great opportunities for us to pursue if they're congruent with our strategy and value creating. I think the significance of Hikma settlement is it gives us a little more clarity around the future for Xyrem and our Oxybate franchise and that additional clarity may be helpful to us in thinking through relative prioritization of different types of transactions, sequencing and the like, but I don't want to overstate that. I would say, for the most part, we were and remain very interested in corp dev as a piece of our ongoing sustainable strategy.

Yeah. So just following on to Bruce's comments, I don't think it changes things very dramatically. We continue to be very focused in both sleep and hematology/oncology as core therapeutic areas, but also have and continue to look around our pain franchise and in areas beyond some of which we've sort of hinted at, but again things that can create adjacencies and let us keep expanding our growth drivers in areas where we feel like we've got some differentiated understanding of the markets. And we can find the same types of products we continually look for in terms of differentiation with attractive margin and return profiles as we've discussed previously. So, urgency is also something where I'd say not really changed other than to say, we've certainly made the comment that as our size increases, we know we need to contemplate the sort of frequency and number of transactions we may do here it may go up over time. So we continue to be very excited about what we see in the current environment and landscape and the opportunity to be able to deploy our capital into corporate development initiatives.

Okay, thank you.

Yeah.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Marc Goodman.

Hey, Marc, are you there?

Marc? We'll circle back.

Our next question comes from the line of Gregg Gilbert of Deutsche Bank. Your line is now open.

Thanks. Can you comment on how much of your Xyrem business is government pay, how that's changed over time and specifically what happened to government patients or for government patients in the first quarter? And as a follow on if you don't mind, regarding the Hikma settlement. Traditional authorized generic deals tend to have the majority of the economics staying with the innovator, and I realize this is a settlement not just a straight AG arrangement, but can you comment directionally on how the value is split either in absolute terms or how it evolves over time? Thanks.

Sure. Mike, you want to take the first part of that?

Sure. As we've said, the single digit reduction in volume that we've had due to the decline in government pay. Government pay is a smaller percentage of our business, and it largely can be impacted for a number of reasons. But for instance, Medicare Part D could hit the – Medicare Part D patients could hit the donut hole in the first quarter. If they can't cover this, they're going to have to seek other means of either assistance or discontinue therapy altogether. And they – we saw a decline in that sector. And then Gregg on the second part of your question, under the terms of our settlement we can't give specific economics. I think what both we and Hikma have said in our public comments is that there are substantial economics to Jazz. That those economics in general increase as sales of the AG increase and then over time, should Hikma choose to continue that AG period they go up yet again. But we can't say more than that at this point.

All right. Thanks.

Thank (44:20) of UBS. Your line is now open.

Yeah, let's move on operator.

And our next question comes from the line of Ken Cacciatore of Cowen & Company. Your line is now open.

Hey, Ken.

Ken, are you there?

Yeah, now I hear you, Ken. Ken Cacciatore - Cowen & Co. LLC: Hello. Sure, thanks. Just wondering about your once-nightly Xyrem formulations, are you still working on any of these or have these been shelved, so any just commentary around that?

Yeah. Not shelved. We haven't been too disclosing of late on what we're doing on the once-nightly side. It was not all that long ago that for the first time we started talking about our two low sodium programs and certainly before we had disclosed those, we really didn't want to say what we were doing on the once-nightly side for two separate reasons. First of all, those programs were more advanced than the once-nightly program and we thought it important to tell you the things that we thought were closest to the finish line. But also you can imagine that because we think it's so important to reduce that sodium load for patients that even in our once-nightly program we'd be contemplating a reduction in sodium as well. Before we had talked about the other low sodium programs, it would have been little hard to have that conversation. So, at this point, we have the two low sodium programs going. We also have a once-nightly program going. It's further back in our pipeline than JZP-258 and JZP-507 and at the appropriate time in the future we'll provide more of an update on that. Ken Cacciatore - Cowen & Co. LLC: Great. Thank you.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Douglas Tsao of Barclays. Your line is now open.

Hi. Good morning. Thanks for – good afternoon. Thanks for taking questions. Just maybe a little bit of an update on Defitelio. It certainly seems like the U.S. launch is going, tracking really well. I mean, if I just do rough math, it doesn't seem like that much of a stretch for you to sort of hit the guidance just at the current level. Should we – how should we think about the cadence as we go through the rest of the year, because it certainly seems like there is a good chance (47:10)?

Yeah. I think in general Doug, we're really pleased with how we got out of the gates in the first part of the year with Defitelio. We've had the experience with Erwinase in the past, and I suspect we will have the experience with Defitelio at times when we'll get some bounciness between quarters just because a fairly small number – a small movement in the number of patients or the split of adult versus pediatric patients can have a meaningful impact. But we're really pleased with the way we started the year both in Europe and the U.S. We think both teams are doing a great job, and let's see how the next the couple of quarters go. I'd love for you to be right and for us to be too conservative at this point, but there is just too much variability for us to be overconfident after one quarter.

And then, just as a follow up if you can give an update on penetration into the adult market. And then, just quickly on Xyrem, I know you've sort of warned us about not focusing on the number too much. But I did notice the number of active patients was flat to the fourth quarter, and typically we see a little bit of a step down. And that seems a little inconsistent with sort of a little bit of the slower volume that we saw. So just curious if you could provide some comments around that as well? Thank you.

Yeah. I'll take the second part first. I think we've cautioned you not to over analyze the average number of patients number. It's kind of a noisy number that bounces around depending on when we do that cut. So, pretty typical for us to see fourth quarter to first quarter is not the best comparison that would be true again this year, but I wouldn't read too much into it. Mike, maybe you can provide a little more color on the adults' progress....

Sure.

...on Defitelio.

Sure. We touched on a little bit earlier that the expansion of the hem/onc team in preparation for the Vyxeos launch, allows us – well allowed us to get some good infusion of adult hem/onc talent. And those folks were trained early on on Defitelio, and I think they're making a difference now in those adult transplant centers. So, we feel that our adoption is growing in the adult. I would say that in the first quarter, the majority of it has been peed, but we feel very good about the adult pickup.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line David Amsellem of Piper Jaffray. Your line is now open. David A. Amsellem - Piper Jaffray & Co.: Thanks. So, a question on JZP-110, so you've initiated this study in EDS associated with Parkinson's. Just curious to get your thoughts on other potential expansion opportunities. Have you given or are you willing to discuss your latest thinking and when could we see additional studies for JZP-110 begin? Thanks.

Maybe I'll let Russ talk a little bit about a broader opportunity set for JZP-110.

Yeah. Hey, David. We've spent a lot of time thinking about what are the other opportunities that could exist with JZP-110. We believe there is an excessive sleepiness platform that could exist. And so, we're analyzing well beyond Parkinson's a number of those potential opportunities. And we actually are thinking beyond that as well, so I would characterize it as early stage and some thinking that has gotten us to proposals, but nothing that we're actually underway with, so stay tuned, we'll get back to with more on that one.

David, I'll just add.... David A. Amsellem - Piper Jaffray & Co.: Yeah, sure.

...if you think about that there are certainly have been a number of other stimulants and weight promoting agents that have been studied, and in some cases used, in other populations. Now, that we've got even more clinical data around JZP-110 to look at the ways in which we see it working from an efficacy standpoint, the way we characterize the safety profile, relative to what we've seen with JZP-110 in earlier trials, but also relative to what we've seen with other agents, it allows us I think to better assess where we want to go next with the molecule. David A. Amsellem - Piper Jaffray & Co.: And if I may sneak in a follow-up, just I mean I know that psychiatry is not in, necessarily in your wheelhouse, but the product is a reuptake inhibitor, so would you consider or are you considering psychiatric indications?

Yeah. So I think, we want to think through opportunities on multiple dimensions, probably the most important being, where could the product make a difference for patients, particularly where there might be areas where relative to other agents this might be particularly helpful to patients. The second dimension to that is, is it the right commercial fit for us. And it's always conceivable there would be something that will be a great medical application where we might or might not be the best commercializer but there are ways to deal with that too through partnerships or other arrangements. But let's start with what difference do we think it could make for patients. David A. Amsellem - Piper Jaffray & Co.: Okay. thanks.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Umer Raffat of Evercore ISI. Your line is now open.

Hi. Thank you so much for taking my question. Bruce, my question to you is, and this is probably a diligence issue that came up for you as well. Has FTC ever formally taken an opinion on whether an authorized generic should or should not count as a generic under acceleration clause brand and settlements? And then on the R&D side, could you give us some more color on JZP-110 on insomnia and chest discomfort at the 150 milligram dose? Thank you.

So, on the second question, we haven't released anything other than the couple of press releases for the Phase 3 program. Obviously, there is some Phase 2 data out there already. We'll be presenting data at the SLEEP meeting in June, and that's probably the best time to get an update on that, nothing more to add at this point. And on your first question, it's kind of a specific question, I'm not sure I want to take that one on right now other than to say in general, as we looked at our potential settlement, we were conscious of making sure it was pro-competitive. In our view, we think it is, on multiple dimensions. You're zeroing in on one fairly narrow dimension, but I don't think we need to comment on that on this call.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line Ken Trbovich of Janney. Your line is now open.

Thanks. I know, we're anxiously awaiting the potential approval of Vyxeos, and I was wondering, when we might hear more about label expansion studies and potential use, not just in AML beyond secondary, but potentially outside of AML?

Yeah. I think, Ken, as we've said, our very clear first priority post the Celator transaction last summer was making sure we got in a really high-quality submission to FDA, and soon behind that to the European authorities as well. We want to get this product out there into patients. What we'll do with it next in terms of clinical development, whether those are approval trials or exploratory trials, what will happen with investigator initiated work, what else we might do with the CombiPlex program, what we might do in combination with Vyxeos and other therapies, all things we're thinking about right now, but anytime there is a question about priorities we push the team right back to, the first focus is let's make sure we get this product on the market as expeditiously as we can, and then I think we'll come back and talk about our near-term priorities for expansion beyond its initial use.

Okay. Thank you.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Jessica Fye of JPMorgan. Your line is now open.

Hey guys. Thanks for taking my question. Just one from me, I want to get your comments on why you felt the need to implement the poison pill on the back of the settlement. Thank you.

Yeah. Jessica, good question. In general, we wanted to take a pause after a number of significant developments in our business of which the Hikma settlement was only one. This came right on the heels of top line data, on OSA of course, at that point we had not yet unwinded JZP-110 and narcolepsy. You know we've only released the barest bones of what we've seen and we're looking forward to presenting that data next month at the APSS meeting, the Vyxeos submission was just going in. We had just started a number of new trials JZP-258 JZP-110 and Parkinson's, the prevention of VOD trial for defibrotide. So, a lot of activity that was brand new and brand new during a period where I think many investors were highly focused on Xyrem durability and would we settle and how would we settle. And so the right rights plan essentially gives our board the chance to ensure that if somebody wanted to take a look at the company, and do so at a very opportune time for them that we had the best positioning to be able to get good information out to our investors that would reflect the value of the company and empower the board, if we went that direction, to get the very best deal for shareholders. This is a little different for an Irish domiciled company like Jazz. We operate under Irish takeover panel rules. Those rules do not allow a company to do what many U.S. companies would do, which is have a rights plan ready to go, but not adopted. And then, if approached put it in the place. Under the Irish rules, once you've been approached, and I would say approached is a broadly defined or interpreted term, you can't do it. So, our view was do it. I think we did it in a responsible way, which is limited to one year, so it'll sunset after a year. But this is something our board had been thinking about for a while that this would be the appropriate time to just take a pause and make sure everyone had a chance to get current on the story in light of the many changes during this brief period of time.

And operator, this will be our last question coming up.

Thank you. And our last question comes from the line of David Maris of Wells Fargo. Your line is now open.

Hi. Good afternoon. Marc said I could take his questions as well. So, I have like a half a dozen of them. On the BD front, can you talk about what the holdup is? I know that no one wants you to rush and do a bad deal, but has it been fit or price or finding. Is there – are there – you'd expressed before that there are lots of opportunities. So, I know the people always say, well it always comes down to price, but is that really what the case is here?

Yeah. Always hard the comment on pacing of corp dev completion because it's not done till it's done. Our strategy over last couple of years has been to always be working on a number of transactions we think are a good fit for us. I'll remind you that after the fact when we can talk about completed transactions, we often tell you about our long period of being in contact with companies and working with them. That was true of Celator, that was true of JZP-110. I think that was a two-year process before we completed that deal. So, we're always in conversations on multiple opportunities that we think could make sense and we're waiting for the right moment whether that's from a value inflexion standpoint or whether that's a development on the other's company side. New clinical data, regulatory milestone or something else that would make it transactable. And many of those things aren't within our control, but our sense is over time if we have a good group looking at multiple opportunities across our business, so that's across development and commercial across the U.S. and Europe, across sleep and hem/onc and potentially other therapeutic areas as we grow we'll be able to execute on the best transactions. And I think speaking for myself and for Matt in our commentary this year, I think we've been pretty bullish about our opportunity set and getting some things done and nothing has changed of late on that front.

Great. Thank you very much.

Thank you. And, I'm showing no further questions at this time. I would now like to turn the call over to Ms. Kathy Littrell for closing remarks.

Thank you. And, thank you all again for joining us today. We'll be participating in the UBS Global Healthcare conference this month and then at the Goldman Sachs Global Healthcare conference next month and we hope to see many of you. This now ends our call.

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for participating in today's conference. This concludes today's program, you may all disconnect. Everyone have a great day.