Good afternoon and thank you for attending the Jazz Pharmaceuticals Second Quarter 2023 Financial Results Call. My name is Elissa, and I will be your moderator for today's call. All lines will be muted during the presentation portion of the call with an opportunity for questions and answers at the end. I would now like to pass the call over to the Jazz Pharmaceuticals team. You may proceed.

Thank you, operator, and good afternoon, everyone. Today, Jazz Pharmaceuticals supported its second quarter 2023 financial results. The slide presentation accompanying this webcast is available on the Investors section of our website. Investors may also refer to the press release we issued earlier today, which is also posted to our website. On the call today are Bruce Cozadd, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; Renee Gala, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; Dan Swisher, President and Chief Operating Officer; and Rob Iannone, Executive Vice President, Global Head of R&D; Kim Sablich, Executive Vice President and General Manager of United States, will join the team for Q&A. On Slide 2, I'd like to remind you that today's webcast includes forward-looking statements, such as those related to our future financial and operating results, growth potential and anticipated development and commercialization milestones and goals which involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual events, performance and results to differ materially from those contained in these forward-looking statements. We encourage you to review the statements contained in today's press release, in our slide deck and in our latest SEC disclosure documents, which identify certain factors that may cause the Company's actual events, performance and results to differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements made on today's webcast. We undertake no duty or obligation to update our forward-looking statements. Turning to Slide 3. On this webcast will discuss non-GAAP financial measures. Descriptions of these non-GAAP financial measures and reconciliations of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures are included in today's press release and the slide presentation available on the Investors section of our website. I'll now turn the call over to Bruce.

Thanks, Andrea. Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us today. I'll start on Slide 5. In the second quarter of 2023, we once again delivered strong commercial results, advanced our efforts to unlock the tremendous potential of our pipeline, and built on our record of driving operational excellence. In particular, our results in the second quarter highlight the durability and growth potential of our commercial portfolio, the capabilities and productivity of our R&D efforts, and our focus on operational excellence. We are pleased to report strong execution across our commercial portfolio with all three key growth drivers of our commercial business, Xywav, Epidiolex, Rylaze achieving year-over-year double-digit growth. Xywav grew by 39% in the second quarter compared to the same period last year and is annualizing at well over $1 billion in revenue. Xywav Wave continues to be the oxybate of choice and the only approved therapy for idiopathic hypersomnia. We expect our oxybate franchise to contribute $2 billion of the $5 billion in total revenue component of Vision 2025 and are well positioned to reach this target. As a reminder, our 2023 neuroscience revenue guidance, which we are raising at the midpoint today and Vision 2025, both account for the availability of high sodium oxybate authorized generics or AGs and branded fixed dose high sodium oxybate. Epidiolex growth remains strong, and we are confident in its potential to reach blockbuster status. We achieved double-digit net sales growth in 2Q '23 compared to the same period last year as we continued to drive prescriber growth across our global markets. Our launch in Europe is gaining momentum, with additional international launches and indication expansions expected this year. In oncology, Rylaze has continued to grow in the U.S., underpinned by strong demand and our increasing emphasis on the adolescent and…

Thanks, Bruce. I'm excited to provide an update on our commercial progress. Starting on Slide 8, with neuroscience and oxybate, we remain confident in the strength and durability of our oxybate franchise as Xywav continues to be the oxybate choice and the only approved therapy for IH. Xywav revenues were $327 million for the second quarter of 2023 and representing growth of 39% compared to the same period in 2022. I'll note, this growth was against the backdrop of high sodium oxybate competition entering the market in January of this year. In narcolepsy, our focus remains on educating patients and prescribers on the benefits of reducing sodium intake and this message continues to resonate. In addition to health benefits of liver sodium, based on our discussions with health care professionals and experienced oxybate patients dosing flexibility to value attribute to Xywav. Exiting the second quarter, approximately 9,300 narcolepsy patients were taking Xywav, and Xywav continues to be the oxybated choice in the marketplace. In IH, we see continued growth of new prescribers with approximately 2,200 patients taking Xywav for treatment of IH exiting the second quarter. IH is a 24-hour sleep disorder despite sleeping a normal or longer than normal and ultimate type people with IH may still experience debilitating symptoms during the day. Xywav is the first and only treatment approved by FDA to treat the full condition of IH. We are focused on educating prescribers on the importance of proper diagnosis and identifying appropriate patients who can benefit from Xywav therapy. And a survey of sleep specialists indicated that 70% anticipate increasing their prescribing in the next six months. With regard to the average number of patients on Xywav exiting the quarter, there was an operational change in our specialty pharmacy, which caused delays in getting refills on…

Thanks, Dan. Starting on Slide 16. We provided an overview of the key clinical programs in our diversified pipeline. We are excited about the advances we've made so far this year with the potential for as many as four late-stage data readouts through 2023 and 2024, which include JZP150 in PTSD, suvecaltamide in essential tremor, zanidatamab in GEA and Zepzelca in combination with Tecentriq in first-line small cell lung cancer. I'll discuss a few of our programs in more detail shortly, but I wanted to broadly highlight our progress across the pipeline before moving on. Starting with neuroscience. We expect top line data from our Phase II trial of JZP150 in PTSD by the end of the year. For JZP441, our Orexin-2 receptor agonist that has the potential to treat narcolepsy, IH and other sleep disorders, we anticipate initial proof of concept in healthy volunteers later this year. In addition, we have ongoing trials for suvecaltamide in both essential tremor or ET and Parkinson's disease tremor, with top line data from the ET trial expected in the first half of 2024. Moving to oncology. Zanidatamab is a priority program for us. We aim to advance Zanidatamab to the market as rapidly as possible with second-line BPC representing our first potential commercial indication. We are planning for a potential accelerated approval of Zanidatamab in second-line BTC and have aligned it with the FDA on a confirmatory trial in first-line metastatic BTC where there remain unmet patient needs. We are also evaluating Zanidatamab in GEA, breast cancer and other HER2-positive solid tumors. For Zepzelca, we expect top line PFS data readout at the end of 2024 or early 2025. Small cell lung cancer patients have particularly poor outcomes, with a five-year overall survival rate of less than 10%. Currently, Zepzelca's indicated to…

Thanks, Rob. I'll start with our top and bottom line results on Slide 24. As a reminder, our full financial results are available in our press release and 10-Q. In the second quarter of 2023, we achieved $957 million in total revenues. This was driven by growth of our key products in both neuroscience and oncology, including another quarter of double-digit growth of Xywav, Epidiolex and Rylaze compared to 2Q '22. We're particularly pleased with the continued trajectory of Xywav even with competition since the beginning of the year, coupled with the continued Epidiolex momentum and strong growth for Rylaze, we saw total revenue increased 3% compared to 2Q '22. Our disciplined capital allocation and focus on operational excellence drove adjusted net income of $325 million growth of 6% compared to the same quarter in 2022. We continue to generate significant cash from our business, recording approximately $617 million of cash from operations in the first half of 2023, an increase of more than $100 million compared to the same period in 2022. Our strong overall financial position means we have significant flexibility to invest in priority commercial and R&D programs as well as corporate development opportunities. Corporate development is a core component of Vision 2025, and we remain active in exploring opportunities to expand our commercial portfolio and pipeline. Turning to Slide 25. We are updating our total 2023 revenue guidance to a range of $3.725 billion to $3.875 billion, reflecting a $25 million increase at the midpoint. This update is underpinned by an increase of $20 million at the midpoint of our neuroscience revenue guidance. Our increased 2023 neuroscience revenue guidance incorporates our continued confidence in the durability of our oxybate franchise in part based on the performance and growth of Xywav during the first half of the…

Thanks, Renee. I'll conclude our prepared remarks on Slide 28. The first half of 2023 has been driven by focused execution and strong commercial results, evidenced by the durability of our oxybate franchise continued growth of Epidiolex and strength in Rylaze sales. We continue to advance our pipeline and invest in long-term growth, and we have as many as four late-stage data readouts through 2024 and that have the potential to further diversify and transform our business. Our latest pipeline addition, Zanidatamab is approaching several near-term clinical and regulatory milestones. Given its applicability across multiple tumor types and lines of therapy, we believe Zanidatamab has $2 billion-plus in peak sales potential. We also remain focused on strategic capital allocation. With our strong cash flow, balance sheet and margins, we have the financial flexibility to make significant investments across commercial, pipeline and corporate development to drive sustainable growth and enhance value. That concludes our prepared remarks. I'd now like to turn the call over to the operator to open the line for Q&A.

We will now begin the Q&A session. [Operator Instructions] The first question comes from the line of Jason Gerberry with Bank of America. Your line is now open.

Mine is on the Phase III Zani GEA study that's going to read out first half next year. Can you help frame what sort of data we can expect on the primary efficacy measures, the PFS OS? Is this a first interim? I'm just wondering if PFS and OS will be mature or the focus really is on ORR in this data cut?

Rob, maybe I'll throw that one to you.

So just to clarify, what we said previously was in 2024, we didn't specify exactly when. And in that, we are referring to PFS as the initial readout. Does that clarify your question?

The next question comes from the line of Joseph Thome with TD Cowen. Your line is now open.

Maybe one on the upcoming PTSD readout. Maybe what's a clinically meaningful benefit on that cap scale? And when you talk about the type of patients enrolled or the on concomitant SSRI or the SRI treatment failures? Can you just put that in context a little bit for us? That would be great.

Yes. Go ahead, Rob.

Sure. So, we haven't said specifically what treatment effect that we've powered to, but you could draw some of your own inferences by looking at the sample sizes, et cetera, that's listed on ct.gov. And you'll note that it's a placebo-controlled trial with two dose levels in the total sample size. Patients are allowed other concomitant medications.

Thank you. The next question comes from the line of Marc Goodman with Leerink Partners. Your line is now open.

Could you please give us a little more color on the comment that you made regarding the operational issues with the specialty pharmacy and the oxybate franchise and just give us a sense of how much you think it may have impacted patients in the quarter or whatever you think it may have impacted or is it impacting anything in the third quarter?

Kim, you want to take that?

Sure. I'd be happy to. So let me start out by saying that we continue to be very confident in the strength and durability of our activate franchise as low sodium Xywav continues to be the activate of choice and the only approved therapy for IH. The decrease in total average active Jazz oxybate patients this quarter primarily reflects the expected impact to Xyrem as a result of Xywav adoption and the availability of AG Xyrem. In terms of Xywav and the average number of patients on Xywav exiting the quarter there was what we're calling an operational change at our specialty pharmacy, which unfortunately caused delays in some Xywav patients getting their refills on time. So this has been addressed. And importantly, I think to understand is that the overall 2Q Xywav HCP and patient demand, the overall market demand for Xywav was in line with our expectations and with what we saw in prior quarters. So this really was an issue at the pharmacy that affected patients. Some patients getting refills, not with the overall demand for Xywav. The benefits of reducing sodium intake in the market continue to resonate with our customers, and we're very confident in the growth opportunity for Xywav and the durability of the franchise. And while we expect Xyrem to continue to decline in line with the Xywav and AG adoption, as you heard, we've raised our full year 2023 financial guidance. and increase our neuroscience revenue guidance at the midpoint. So overall, our increased neuroscience revenue guidance accounts for the performance and growth of Xywav during the first half of the year in the time period in which we saw the introduction of high sodium oxybate competition. So our focus remains on continuing to grow the low sodium Xywav, which is already, as you saw annualizing at well over $1 billion, and we remain very confident in the durability of the business.

Thank you. The next question comes from the line of Akash Tewari with Jefferies. Your line is now open.

So can you walk me through your confidence on the $2 billion sodium oxybate number for your long-term guidance let's say you continue to add about 250 IH patients a quarter until '25. That kind of implies IH will contribute about $600 million in sales by 2025. That means that your narcolepsy franchise, which is about $1.7 billion today only declined to about $1.4 billion for you to hit that $2 billion watermark. How do you achieve that with generic and Avida launching? Like what are we missing here? Also, I think you've previously mentioned the majority of the erosion impact for the sodium oxybate franchise will occur in 2023. Is that still the case today given your revised neuro guide?

Yes, Akash, thanks for the question. We outlined our confidence that oxybate business at Jazz would contribute about $2 billion towards Vision 2025. And at the beginning of last year, at the beginning of 2022, obviously, we reiterated that coming into '23, and we've now actually increased our short-term guidance in '23. As a reminder, what we meant by that $2 billion was the combined revenues from Xywav both in narcolepsy and in idiopathic hypersomnia, continued brand Xyrem sales and our royalties on any AGs that come to market through our system. And we continue to feel confident in that. You didn't specifically mention the royalties in your analysis I'll remind you that the contribution from those royalties is expected to be significantly higher in the second half of 2023 relative to the first half and that the royalty structure we've disclosed from the Hikma relationship will actually reset up again in 2024. So it's the combination of all those things that get us to the durability. Our big focus, as Kim explained, is on growing Xywav. This is the longer, healthier choice for patients given the benefits of low sodium in this chronic treatment and we'd like to see more and more patients get the benefit of Xywav moving forward.

Thank you. The next question comes from the line of David Amsellem with Piper Sandler. Your line is now open.

So I wanted to come back to the Vision 2025 targets, particularly the $5 billion top line. It seems like the Street and the broader investor community is not quite there regarding the $5 billion target. So just can you articulate what you think we're all missing? Is it something surrounding Epidiolex? Is it Zanidatamab, for instance, is GE biliary track cancer are both in that 2025 number? Just help us understand why there seems to be daylight between that target and what folks are modeling for 2025.

Yes. Well, let's review where we are towards Vision 2025. Again, we rolled this out at the beginning of 2022. We're six quarters in to a four-year period. We're feeling very good about the performance of our business overall, both relative to our guidance for 2023, which has now been raised on both the top and the bottom line and our Vision 2025. I just spoke about oxybate and the durability of that franchise and the positive progress we're seeing with Xywav. But let me remind you that half of our business today is already coming from Epidiolex and oncology. We're seeing double-digit growth in our three lead assets, Xywav, Epidiolex and Rylaze which together are accounting for about 66% of our revenues. And when you look at the oxybate piece, Xyrem is now less than half of that piece of our business. So we've got growth coming in all of our key franchises, which we estimated would contribute in 2025 approximately $4.5 billion in aggregate. We left a placeholder in Vision 2025 intentionally for our ongoing corporate development activities and said that products that were not part of our portfolio when we started Vision 2025 could contribute that last $0.5 billion. Zanidatamab may well contribute to that. We're not saying it's going to contribute all of the $500 million, to be clear, but that was something added to the portfolio after we began this process. And we remain very interested in continuing to access new commercial products and pipeline products through our corporate development efforts moving forward. Our financial position is strong. If you look at our cash and investments, about $1.4 billion, you look at our cash flow in the first half of the year, approaching $620 million. Our leverage is down. So we feel like we're well positioned to continue to bring in new assets. as we have over the Company's history, if you go back any two- to three-year period in our history, you'll generally see us do a significant transaction. And we thought it was unfair to assume that we would suddenly stop doing transactions, particularly given our successful launches of a number of products in a row here and our strong financial position.

Thank you. The next question comes from the line of Ami Fadia with Needham. Your line is now open

Perhaps continuing on the vain of the placeholder for corporate development, can you talk about your level of confidence in being able to hit for a majority of that $500 million through some sort of business development? And what are your thoughts at currently in terms of alternative options in terms of use of capital would you consider buying back more shares? Should you not be in a position to execute on such a deal?

Renee, can you jump in on this one?

Sure. I'm happy to. So Ami, we've talked quite a bit about our strategic and disciplined approach to capital allocation. And our priority, first and foremost, is investing in growth. So we're investing behind our commercial launches and growth programs. We're investing behind the pipeline, and we expect to continue to invest in corporate development, as Bruce mentioned previously, it has been an important pillar of growth for us, and we expect that to continue to be the case. In addition, we also look at opportunities in terms of managing the balance sheet strategically. Bruce also mentioned we pretty quickly. So we're in a great position today to be opportunistic in terms of additional investments for the balance sheet. And we did take the opportunity, just given what we view as immense untapped value right now within the stock. We did take the opportunity to recommence share repurchases in the second quarter, and we think that was the right thing to do. In terms of future repurchases, we'll continue to look carefully at the opportunity set in front of us prioritizing growth. And then specific to the $500 million placeholder, as you've heard on the call today, we're really excited about the opportunity for Zanidatamab. We think that's going to be an important program and eventually product for us and for patients. We don't expect that to cover a large majority of the $500 million, but it's certainly -- we certainly expect that to contribute. And then beyond that, we're quite active from a corporate development perspective. As you've heard me say previously, we're not going to overpay just to be able to meet this growth objective. We also don't think that we'll need to. We do think there are opportunities out there, both within neuroscience and oncology, but also within the rare and orphan segment more broadly. As you know, the vast majority of our commercial products currently do fall within that category, and we think there are applicable learnings in terms of working directly with patient groups and serving the needs of patients or underlying infrastructure those learnings can be shared both from our existing experience to other rare and orphan conditions. So today, we feel quite confident in our ability to transact we're well capitalized to be able to do so as Bruce mentioned previously. And we think we've established a great track record as a partner of choice to be able to do so as well.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Gregory Renza with RBC Capital Markets. Your line is now open.

Great. Bruce and team, congrats on the quarter. Bruce, maybe just a little bit on Epidiolex and just with respect to Dan's comments on the drivers for potential continued growth. Just curious if you can comment a bit on any particular areas or drivers that kind of outsized and help to propel the growth that you're expecting certainly last quarter, first quarter, a little seasonality and seeing the momentum that you're speaking about now? I'm just curious how you see that playing out in the near term.

Yes. Dan, do you want to take Epidiolex?

Yes. Thanks, Bruce. So with Epidiolex, there's another quarter of double-digit growth with 15%, Greg. So really pleased to see the continued initiatives that we outlined on the call, continued face-to-face interactions, very important in the treatment centers, getting to more offices, more prescribers. We've been enhancing our focus on the adult setting. In particular, in the U.S., we've got after long-term care settings and seeing increasing penetration there. We've also been educating HCPs about the benefits of Epidiolex beyond seizure control. And that was highlighted in the become data, which was presented at the end of last year, which talks about cognitive and behavioral benefits and we look forward to continuing to lean into that area, both with caregiver surveys and even interventional studies. And so we've got a real commitment to continuing to generate data, both within the indications and kind of outside those indications. Outside the U.S., the launches continue to go well. We're at 23 countries globally. We've had six positive pricing reimbursement decisions to date in the U.S. -- sorry, outside the U.S. And importantly, we've got a Phase III study and what we think could be a very significant market for us with Epidiolex in Japan. And so that's enrolling nicely, and we look forward to providing updates in the coming quarters.

Thank you. The next question comes from the line of Annabel Samimy with Stifel. Your line is now open.

Just a couple more on Epidiolex. So you mentioned a couple of times now expanded indications, the only indication we know that you're working on is the EMA indication. So are there others that we don't know about that you plan on expanding into? And also with the EU launch, we now have 23 countries approved, I guess, five in the major EU countries, but are all those countries on board? Should we now see a significant expansion in Epidiolex ex-U.S.

Rob, would you like to talk a little bit about some of the additional data we're generating with Epidiolex? And then maybe, Kim, you could talk a little bit about the potential for broader use of the product over time?

Yes. So, you're right that we're evaluating EMA and the objective there is to generate data and yet another seizure type. Adding to the three indications we have, really trying to demonstrate that Epidiolex is broadly active across different seizure types, regardless of the underlying etiology. We also continue to provide evidence around the indications we have, both in terms of anti-seizure effectiveness, but also in terms of other potential benefits of Epidiolex. And you heard Dan refer to the caretaker survey, and we continue to support and do studies along those lines as well.

Yes, sure, Rob. So I'll say that we've had very nice growth in the three indicated populations as well as growth over time and the base of prescribers that are utilizing Epidiolex. And what we see traditionally as our customers get more and more experience with the product, usually starting in the three indications they see what it can do for their patients in terms of seizure control and now beyond seizure control that frankly, they've been hearing about from caregivers since day one of the launch. And this really gives them the confidence to start using it more broadly across the section of various seizure types and so forth. So we're clearly not promoting it outside that, but this is what we hear from the providers once they get the experience they see the efficacy, they do start to utilize it earlier and more broadly across their patient population. And really, the data, as we've talked about, that we've been sharing to really increase the efficacy perception of the product, the clobazam combination data in and of itself, get them to stop and think about why am I reserving this for certain patient types. Most of my patients are on clobazam, most of them could still benefit from additional seizure control or beyond seizure benefits and it really gets them to start thinking about I should be using this more and more and more of these patients that are taking clobazam.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Jeff Hung with Morgan Stanley. Your line is now open.

For Rylaze, you've talked about focusing on adolescents and young adults. Can you talk a little bit more about how that's going and how much of that opportunity remains to be addressed?

Kim?

Sure, love to. I love talking about Rylaze. What we've really seen with Rylaze is just lack of excitement in general. And I think as we told you early on, it didn't take very long for health care providers to have confidence in the supply and to return to best clinical practice in terms of switching patients at the first sign of hypersensitivity. At this point in the pediatric market, it's been added almost universally to the protocols in that setting. So at the beginning of this year, we did tell you that we were looking to start trying to expand the adolescent and young adult market. There was quite a bit of usage -- a fair amount of usage of the product in adolescents and young adults that were being treated in the pediatric center per pediatric protocol but the adult centers were less educated, familiar and experienced with using Rylaze in this setting. And so we've gone out there this year. We have now spent two quarters educating them on the product, about the importance of switching as quickly as possible when they see a hypersensitivity reaction. And we see nice orders coming through and a nice growth rate happening in this setting. So we don't think we're done. We haven't gotten all of these centers to start using it. Some of them are still dabbling. So there definitely is some more growth to be had there. And I think it's important to remember that in the adult setting, because this is a weight-based product, the average dose is higher than in the pediatric center. So each adult patient is worth more. So, we're really pleased with Rylaze at this date, but we think there's a little bit more room to grow here in the U.S. and then, of course, ex-U.S.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Balaji Prasad with Barclays. Your line is now open.

This is Xiao on for Balaji. Just a quick one on your OX2R program. On the data for TAK-994 that was recently published on New England Journal of medicine and the factor for liver toxicity for TAK-994 was the impact of reactive metabolics. So Takeda also mentioned that TAK-861 and TAK-994 do have the overlapping mitabiotic pathways. So do you think JZP441 is well differentiated with TAK-994 to avoid this issue?

Rob?

Yes, thank you for the question. So, the liver toxicity associated with 994 was known at the time that we entered into the partnership with Sumitomo, and we focused on chemical series that we thought were distinct enough such that that wouldn't -- at risk of liver toxicity wouldn't be carried over. And so, we do think that our molecule is substantially differentiated from the chemical series that you referred to.

Thank you. The next question comes from the line of Mohit Bansal with Wells Fargo. Your line is now open.

Great. And congrats on all the progress. So maybe like one question regarding the authorized generics for Xyrem, do you think they will have any impact on IH market as such because in our talk to doctors, they think that they can prescribe it as long as we cover payers would probably cover it. So do you see this as a threat because doctors could use it off-label?

Yes. Well, I'll remind you that Xyrem did not do a comprehensive clinical program in the way that Xywav has in IH. There's slightly different dosing information in the label. And while you're right that physicians can prescribe the product that does not always mean that, that product will be successfully reimbursed. Kim, any comments you want to make on the marketplace?

Yes, sure. So yes, we've seen traditionally the payer -- that HCPs have had trouble getting coverage for oxybate for idiopathic hypersomnia because payers restricted it with the introduction of byway for idiopathic hypersomnia we have achieved nice coverage as we do with narcolepsy of 90% of commercial lives having coverage. There is utilization management criteria in place there and certainly heavier utilization management criteria around non indicated products. So we feel confident that while it's a small portion of health care plans may cover high sodium oxybate in particular, the AG for idiopathic hypersomnia. Most of them are following the FDA-approved label and Xywav is the only FDA-approved treatment for idiopathic hypersomnia.

And Rob, maybe you could just expand a little bit on that slightly different dosing information?

Yes, Bruce, specifically with regard to narcolepsy or IH or?

I meant IH, but you can talk about dosing flexibility generally.

Sure. So starting with IH then, the clinical trial allowed for an initial dose of up to 6 grams. And at the time, it was designed that way because there was some uncertainty around whether IH patients would make up to take that second dose. What we found in the clinical trials that with initiation of Xywav, patients with IH improved substantially. And in fact, we're able to go ahead and take the second dose. And overall, that was the more common dosing regimen, even though in the trial, and we find that to be the case in clinical practice as well along those lines for narcolepsy. As you know, Xywav also has dosing flexibility to allow for uneven doses. And we find that patients really do prefer this Oftentimes, schedules are different from one patient to another. But even within a patient, schedules made different day to day, week days, weekends depending on family obligations, and they like the flexibility of uneven doses potentially.

Thank you. The next question comes from the line of Joon Lee with Truist Securities. Your line now is open.

Congrats on the quarter. How do you quantify the trade-off between having a once a night drug with high sodium versus twice a night drug with no sodium? Isn't having to wake up in the middle of also unhealthy? And as a quick follow-up, do you have any views on reboxetine currently in Phase III/IV for narcolepsy with data expected in the fourth quarter?

Yes. Rob, maybe I could have you jump in a little bit on the nighttime impact of oxybate therapy?

Yes, happy to, Bruce. So we know that narcolepsy patients have significantly disrupted nighttime sleep. We also know that oxybate have a very big impact in improving the architecture of nighttime sleep. And we think that's why for a short-acting drug, patients then have substantial improvement in daytime symptoms like cataplexy or excessive daytime sleepiness. When you look across studies of oxybate, whether that be a fixed dose high sodium version or immediate release oxybate there is improvement. It's very comparable. There's no evidence that a fixed-dose regimen improves to suite sleep to a greater extent. Patients typically do not normalize their sleep and there's really no evidence that waking to take a second administration impacts one way or another.

And then Rob, I think there was a question on reboxetine at the end of the question as well.

And sorry, Bruce, could you just repeat that for me then?

I think the question was any thoughts on data on reboxetine? I mean I'll just jump in and say historically, we -- in our conversations with KOLs, we've not found that there's as much interest in that as other drugs available or in development. This has been available in certain markets for a long time in treatment of other diseases, but we haven't heard of a huge success in this patient population in the U.S.

Okay. Thanks for clarifying that, Bruce. And I would just say that our focus with Xywav is a nighttime administration to address the underlying cause of disruptive nighttime sleep, which has profound effects on daytime symptoms. Reboxetine is one of several drugs that's used as a daytime alerting agent, and is sometimes complementary to oxybate, but we don't think a substitute for many patients.

Thank you. The next question comes from the line of Charles Duncan with Cantor Fitzgerald. Your line is now open.

Bruce and team, congrats on good commercial performance in the quarter and thanks taking our questions. Sorry to ask about a nuance in the pipeline, but it actually relates to the next readout that could come. And that's on JZP150 and PTSD disorder. I guess I'm wondering if given that this is an early Phase II, would you focus more on stat sig and effect size or the overall results of the study to enable the drug to move forward. And then in terms of the statistical analysis plan, it looks like a wide range of doses. So I guess I'm wondering, is it each dose relative to placebo? Or would you combine doses, the analysis of the two dose groups versus placebo?

Rob, do you want to take the 150 question?

Yes. Thanks, Bruce. We do think the cap size is a comprehensive composite endpoint. It has regulatory endorsement as an endpoint that could be used for approval, and it does capture quite a bit the broad range of symptomatology in PTSD patients. So we do think that that's a good way to measure the effect of the drug. We are measuring other things in exploratory ways as well, which we certainly will take into account. You're right that the trial is three arms. There's two active dose levels in placebo. And given the sample size that we have, we feel we're well powered to make comparisons with both of those different dose levels against placebo. We don't have to collapse across those ones.

Well, I think that was our last question. So I just want to jump in and thank all of our questioners for moving us through, I think, most of our commercial business, a lot of our pipeline and our strategy. Hopefully, people feel great about the quarter on the top line, on the bottom line, the new guidance, increased diversification and the momentum we have in our business, particularly our three key growth drivers in Xywav, Epidiolex and Rylaze. I'd just like to close today's call by recognizing all of our Jazz colleagues for their efforts in delivering new therapeutic options to patients, and thank our partners and shareholders for their continued confidence and support. Thank you all for joining us today.

This concludes today's call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect your lines.