Welcome to the James River Group Second Quarter 2022 Earnings Conference Call. My name is Hilda and I will be your operator for today. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct a question-and-answer session. And now I would now like to turn the call over to Mr. Brett Shirreffs, Head, Investor Relations. Mr. Shirreffs you may begin.

Thank you. Good morning, everyone, and welcome to the James River Group second quarter 2022 earnings conference call. During the call, we will be making forward-looking statements. These statements are based on the current beliefs, intentions, expectations and assumptions that are subject to various risks and uncertainties, which may cause actual results to differ materially. For a discussion of such risks and uncertainties, please see the cautionary language regarding forward-looking statements in yesterday's earnings release and the risk factors in our most recent Form 10-K and Form 10-Qs and other reports and filings we have made with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We do not undertake any duty to update any forward-looking statements. I will now turn the call over to Frank D'Orazio, Chief Executive Officer of James River Group.

Thank you for that introduction, Brett. Good morning and welcome to everyone on the call. I'm pleased to be back with all of you today to provide additional color on our second quarter as our strong operating momentum has continued throughout the first half of the year. Undoubtedly, we remain a leader in the E&S market and our teams across the entire organization have executed exceptionally well on their business plans. We have been able to capitalize on market opportunities while optimizing portfolios that haven't met our profitability expectations. We have done this while also building out our enterprise risk management framework and making other investments across the platforms to make sure James River becomes stronger and more profitable underwriting company. These efforts have resulted in very strong financial results for both the second quarter and for the first half of the year as we posted a 91% combined ratio in Q2 and a 94.2% at the midway point of the year. Our adjusted net operating return on tangible common equity came in at 19.9% for the second quarter and 15.5% on a year-to-date basis. These are excellent results by any measure and are driven by our focus on delivering consistent underwriting profits. To that end, I am extremely pleased that all three of our segments produced an underwriting profit during the second quarter, demonstrating the strong earnings potential of our company. I referenced enterprise risk management just a moment ago and to just expand a bit on that topic ERM has been a key priority for the executive team and our Board since I joined the company almost two years ago. We remain focused on building out our enterprise risk management discipline by adding staff and functional expertise while embedding our new risk framework into the fabric of the…

Thanks, Frank, and good morning, everyone. James River had another solid quarter delivering 20 million of adjusted net operating income and moving further into a strong 2022. This included $16.8 million of underwriting profit and $14.7 million of net investment income each on a pre-tax basis. Operating income was up approximately 44% from last quarter and over 6% from the comparable quarter last year. For the first half of the year, adjusted net operating return on tangible common equity was 15.5% even adjusting for the change in accumulated other comprehensive income, which benefited our and most competitors returns on tangible common equity this quarter. Our OTCE accelerated meaningfully from the first quarter of this year. Our reserves remain stable and we are recognizing $1.5 million of favorable development in our Specialty Admitted segment this quarter as in many prior quarters that is due to prior accident years in workers' compensation dating back to 2016. As we did between the first and second quarters of last, we slightly raised our workers' compensation related loss pick this quarter given the impacts of continued soft rate and some activity in the book. Our competitive expense ratio of 25.8% was largely identical to that of last quarter and a continued advantage we enjoy as compared to others with similar business models. As mentioned earlier, investment income was $14.7 million this quarter. We are starting to see the benefit of higher new money yields in the fixed income portfolio. Income from that part of the portfolio in particular $15.2 million as compared to $13.4 million in the first quarter of this year. Overall, our weighted average book yield improved sequentially from 2.75% to approximately 3% during the quarter and current reinvestment rates are about 100 basis points ahead of that. Our portfolio duration is 4.3…

Thank you. And we have Mark Hughes from Truist. Please go ahead.

Yes. Thank you very much. Good morning.

Good morning, Mark.

Frank, you mentioned that pricing is well ahead of loss cost inflation. Are you seeing any kind of movements there in loss costs. I think you pointed out how in workers' comp soft pricing and maybe some activity in the book I think as well you describe it was motivating you to pick up the loss picks there. But are you seeing anything more broadly around inflation?

Sure. So we increased our view of loss cost trend for 2022 at the end of last year. I think we've spoken to this before with trend for our portfolio in the mid-single-digit range with certain lines of business perhaps as high as maybe 200 basis points or so higher and we look at all of our assumptions regularly as part of our quarterly review process in the event we feel we need to make a change as we did with workers' comp we address it. And when you think about our portfolio as well as some of the more concerning areas relative to inflation, remember our Excess Property Unit is less than 5% of our E&S segment. Commercial auto is even smaller. So when we discuss loss trend, we tend to focus on the difference between our view of loss trend in a particular line and exposure trend for that same product line. So in essence, we view exposure trend is a bit of an offset to loss trend and fortunately the markets we operate in have remained fairly healthy and I would suggest that the majority of our portfolio captures inflation impacted exposure basis. So those jumped and exposure are being captured in our premium formulas. But from a rate perspective, we've been collecting positive rate change. Now on the E&S portfolio for 5.5 years or so. So, yes, more broadly at the halfway point in 2022 with rate change at positive 12%. We're not only well in excess of our view of loss trend, but ahead of our rate change assumption in our 2022 business plan and that speaks to margin expansion, margin expansion especially when you consider that we collected 13% of positive rate in both 2021 as well as 2020.

Thank you for that. And then when it comes to the economy, anything you're seeing in your SME client base that makes you think there is any kind of slowdown that's ongoing. And in the context of that, I don't know if you can quantify the impact of audit premium in the quarter, but would be interested in any details there?

Well I would say despite some of the broader U.S. macro concerns, our insurance continue to see solid economic fundamentals. We're not seeing any negative issues just relative to revenues or exposure basis at this point. We see exposure growth show up in our premium formulas at this juncture relative to premium audits. Yes, it's component of what we see on a quarterly basis, premium audits occur over the course of the entire year. It's just something that we capture in addition to renewal and new business as well. But I wouldn't see any kind of perceived trends there at this at least at this juncture.

And then Sarah maybe I hear what you're saying about new money yield 100 basis points higher access of the portfolio turnover. Should we assume maybe extra 20 bps of portfolio yield per quarter, 25 bps similar to what you saw on Q1 to Q2?

That's not an unreasonable assumption, Mark, I think.

Okay, thank you.

Our next question comes from Meyer Shields from KBW. Please go ahead.

Thanks. Good morning. Sarah, if I can follow-up on that question. When we talk about new money yields for James River, have you seen any meaningful change in the third quarter to-date?

Yes, I think the best I can say is compared to where we are in a book yield basis, it's about 100 basis points higher. So we're up about 4% there. Meyer, I think across our composite portfolio, it's not terribly different from where the end -- from where we were at the end of the quarter. So over the last month or so, but that's how I frame that in terms of what we're looking at current reinvestment rates across the whole portfolio.

Okay, fantastic. A couple of other small questions. First of all, any changes in ceding commission rates specifically with any?

No. Not anything to speak of. You're talking about the overrides just relative to what we appreciate in terms of the ceded treaties, Meyer?

Exactly, yes.

Fairly consistent with past years relative to our major core renewals that just came up maybe year.

Okay, that's good news. And then final question, you've talk and shown for a while a lot of growth in Excess Casualty. Can you talk about the tail of that line of business relative to, I don't know, general casualty or the overall non- Uber portfolio of few years ago?

Sure. So let's talk about the portfolio first a bit. We tend to be a first excess player right. So we're playing right over right in excess of primary. The vast majority of the time so we're not a high excess player, we're not a mezzanine player, we're writing right over primary. And the tail is certainly going to be longer than your primary general casualty layers, but our limits are still fairly tight even on a gross basis. I would say, well over 90% of our limit profile is $5 million or less on a gross basis. So it's not as long as you might think or as long as you may think of just relative to tail concerns with other excess players that play throughout a program, top of the tower and mid-tower or et cetera. So we have tough products in there. You can have GL exposures you can have auto exposures, et cetera. So that, depending on what the primary exposure base is driving the risk, it's going to obviously speak to the tail of that component of the book. But not - I would say, not out of the realm of how we think about it to be a couple of years longer than, let's say, our primary GL.

Okay that's perfect. That's all I needed. Thank you.

Our next question comes from Brian Meredith from UBS. Please go ahead.

Yes, thanks a couple here. First, Sarah, I think last quarter, you were telling us maybe 19% to 21% of the tax rate. It was lower this a little lower this quarter is 19% to 21% still the number we should be thinking about?

I think it was right around 21% for the year. That's probably what we'll end up. Obviously, a little bit different from where we are in the quarter, Brian. So I would think about it in terms of that. And that's - I think just as a quick reminder, that's due to the losses that we experienced in Bermuda related to the LPT in the first quarter that's going to push up the effective tax rate.

Okay terrific. And then Frank, I was just curious. You obviously seen a nice improvement in your rate activity rate levels in this quarter, whereas a lot of the people in the industry are experiencing a moderation and meaningful deceleration in rates achieved. Why do you think that is - that you all are different?

Well again, I've seen some of the same dynamics that you're referencing, particularly in the admitted market. Like I said in my earlier comments, I think the headline increased just relative to rate for us is driven by some of our larger underwriting divisions, like excess casualty, where we saw rates at double-digit increases. But also a number of other kind of specialist areas, including sports and entertainment, healthcare, excess property, definitely. I mean, we're generally seeing healthy rate increases across our E&S segment. And in most underwriting divisions, renewal rate changes have been well ahead of where we expected them to be in 2022. So broadly favorable market conditions, I think, suggests that we can continue to push the pricing momentum that we have certainly throughout the rest of the year.

Got you that's great. And then, I guess, my last question, just curious. Any noticeable differences in kind of submission activity now that we're a couple of quarters away from all of the stuff that was going on?

Well, it's been a real positive in terms of where we've seen growth in our submissions. Again, like the first quarter, we saw double-digit increases in our renewal submissions, 16 points up quarter-over-quarter in the second quarter. And for us, that's just very efficient use of our underwriters' time because our conversion ratios are so high on our renewal book. So we continue to see that as very steady growth over prior, just relative to holding on to our renewals longer, which is great again, particularly given the rate change we've been experiencing over the last couple of years.

Absolutely thanks it's very helpful.

Thank you.

Next in line, we have Tracy Benguigui from Barclays. Please go ahead.

Good morning, I'm wondering if you could provide additional color on taking up your loss picks for workers' comp. We're hearing from others that there is an exposure component on the wage side. So I think indemnity represents 50% of claim. So would want to hear a little bit more on why you have a more adverse view. Particularly as well, you made a few comments about a few other considerations?

Sure. No, I'm happy to do that, Tracy. So we've been talking about the rate erosion in our workers' comp portfolios, particularly in California, for some time, as rates have been softening for several years. And it's important to just note that, again, we have two very distinctively different portfolios, one focused in the Southeast, and the other, a California program. So we're not a 50-state writer. We were very disappointed to see the recommended rate increase that was put forward to the California Workers Comp Rating Bureau shot down in the last few weeks. So the recommendation, as we understood it, was for an increase of a bit greater than 7%. For us, pricing for our large California workers' comp program for 2022 is down roughly 13%, which is certainly greater than anticipated. And we recognize wage change as an offset, but not enough to make up that gap. So we're trying to be responsive and may be conservative in the current accident year. As for the releases, we've been writing individual risk workers' comp for a long time at Falls Lake or Specialty Admitted, and we've been writing our large California program since 2016. Frankly, market conditions and our retentions have been different along that continuum. And we look at our reserves quarterly and felt comfortable with the actions that we took just relative to the release.

In which years were the releases coming from?

A number - this is - it's not a huge number in any one given year. And again, we've written these portfolios in both instances for a number of years. So it's really across a number of years.

I think I said it went back to 2016, Tracy. So kind of started there and working more currently.

Okay. I mean how do you think about experience because it is a long tail line? Do you think enough time has passed since 2016?

We're very comfortable with our reserves. We've had continued and consistent redundancy in those old years. Again, if you think about what that book is, small Southeastern exposure in those years, for the most part. And then obviously, the California book, we're looking at six years out. I think we're pretty comfortable with where we are and have been very conservative here.

Got it. And my last question. So you've given us guidance that casualty premiums will go down $100 million this year versus last. And if I just look at the first half of the year, premiums are down by $64 million. So how should we expect the cadence to look like the second half of the year will it slow down?

I'll let Frank - Frank, do you want to take that one or...?

Well, I would just say broadly, again, if you think about where we finished the year in 2021 and the fact you said we're going to take $100 million out and where we finished through the halfway point we're kind of there or kind of on the pace that you might expect. And Sarah, I don't know if you want to add to that?

Yes, I would just say that the first half of the year, last year was significantly larger than the second half of the year, Tracy, just to kind of put that in context, not every quarter is even - and that's one way to frame it. I think the other piece is, as we said, as Frank said in his comments, we're going to look at every single renewal and every single opportunity in a quarter-by-quarter basis and make those decisions as the market comes to us. I don't think we're going to be beholden to write anything or do anything. So I think those will be, to some degree, real-time decisions. But I would also point to the cadence in the book over the course of last year.

Thank you.

At this moment, we have no further questions. I will now turn the call to Mr. Frank D'Orazio, Chief Executive Officer, for final remarks.

Thank you. And I want to thank everyone listening on the call for their time today and for the questions we received this morning. We look forward to speaking with you again in a few months to discuss our Q3 results. Thank you, and enjoy your day.

Thank you, ladies and gentlemen. This concludes today's conference. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.