Good morning, and thank you for standing-by. Welcome to the Second Quarter 2024 OrthoPediatrics Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. We will be facilitating a question-and-answer session towards the end of today's call. As a reminder, this call is being recorded for replay purposes. I would now like to turn the conference over to Trip Taylor from Gilmartin Group for a few introductory comments. Please go ahead.

Thank you for joining today's call. With me from the company are David Bailey, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Fred Hite, Chief Operating and Financial Officer. Before we begin today, let me remind you that the company's remarks include forward-looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws, including the Safe Harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, and the company's actual results may differ materially. For a discussion of risk factors, I encourage you to review the company's most recent annual report on Form 10-K, which was filed with the SEC on March 8, 2024. During the call today, management will also discuss certain non-GAAP financial measures, which are supplemental measures of performance. The company believes these measures provide useful information for investors in evaluating its operations period-over-period. For each non-GAAP financial measure referenced on this call, the company has included a reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures in its earnings release. Please note that the non-GAAP financial measures have limitations as analytical tools and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for OrthoPediatrics financial results prepared in accordance with GAAP. In addition, the content of this conference call contains time-sensitive information that is accurate only as of the date of this live broadcast. Today, August 6, 2024. Accepted as required by law, the company undertakes no obligation to revise or update any statements to reflect events or circumstances taking place after the date of this call. With that, I would like to turn the call over to David Bailey, President and Chief Executive Officer.

Thanks, Trip. Good morning, everyone and thank you for joining us on our second quarter 2024 conference call. We're extremely proud to begin our call by reporting that we've helped over 32,000 kids in the second quarter of 2024, a 52% increase and another record high for OrthoPediatrics. Our cause is rooted in the desire to positively impact the lives of as many children worldwide as possible. And the 52% year-over-year increase is a true reminder that we continue to make an impact and are successfully delivering not cause every day. OrthoPediatrics continued a strong performance into the second quarter of 2024, with revenues reaching a record $52.8 million, surpassing the $50 million mark for the first time in our history and representing a 33% increase from the same period in 2023. This achievement was fueled by the effective execution of our business strategy and help deliver top line revenue growth, produced healthy margins and positive adjusted EBITDA. We are pleased with the momentum we are generating, and we look forward to continuing to drive results in the second half of 2024. Before diving deeper into the quarterly results, I'm going to briefly touch on the overall macro trends. At this point, we believe we are working in a normalized surgical environment. Hospital staffing have increased, efficiencies in the operating areas have improved, and we've seen minimal disruptions in Infinity summer surgery schedule. Going forward, we expect more of the same, barring any major disruptions from future respiratory illnesses. In the quarter, our revenue showed more variability on a month-to-month basis, particularly in the surgical segments of trauma and deformity and scoliosis, which experienced a delayed start to their peak season. However, once the season started, it accelerated rapidly into the close of the quarter and is extending into the…

Thanks, Dave. Our second quarter 2024 worldwide revenue of $52.8 million increased 33% compared to the second quarter of 2023. Growth in the quarter was driven primarily by our strong performances across global trauma and formally domestic scoliosis and OPSB as well as the addition of Boston O&P revenue. US revenue was $41.2 million, a 39% increase from the second quarter of 2023. Growth in the quarter was primarily driven by our trauma in the Trauma and Deformity product line, scoliosis and OPSB as well as the addition of Boston O&P revenue. We generated total international revenue of $11.6 million, representing growth of 16% compared to the second quarter of 2023. Growth in the quarter was primarily driven by Trauma and Deformity and OPSB, partially offset by soft international scoliosis revenue. In the second quarter of 2024, Trauma and Deformity global revenue of $37.8 million increased 37% compared to the prior year period. Growth was primarily driven by strong growth across numerous product lines, specifically Pega Systems, PNP Tibia, Ex-Fix and OPSB as well as the addition of Boston O&P revenue. In the second quarter of 2024, Scoliosis revenue of $13.7 million increased 26% compared to the prior year period. Growth was primarily driven by increased new users of our spine systems and RESPONSE-5.5, 6.0 offset by negative growth in the international scoliosis revenue. Finally, Sports Medicine/Other revenue in the second quarter of 2024 was $1.3 million compared to $1.2 million in the prior year period. Turning to second point. $7.8 million of sets were consigned in the second quarter of 2024 compared to $9.2 million in the second quarter of 2023. Year-to-date, we have deployed $12.1 million of sets compared to $12.2 million at this time last year. Touching briefly on a few key metrics. For the second quarter…

Thanks, Fred. As we've reached in the end of the year, it's encouraging to see where we stand today. We have established a solid base for continual room and are looking forward to several upcoming catalysts that could pave the way for further expansion. We are confident that we will carry our movement into the back half of the year and beyond as we continue to help more children than ever shader revenue breakers, capture share across the entire business, maintained healthy margins and execute on our EBITDA expectations. We are well positioned to drive improved operating leverage, all the while making meaningful investments in substantial opportunities from transformational product development, including EOS, EU MDR compliance as well as OPSB and digital health. Our continued execution will produce an expected $8 million to $9 million in adjusted EBITDA this year and an adjusted EBITDA level next year equal to consistent annual set appointment, taking a major step towards cash flow breakeven. In closing, I'd like to thank our surgeon partners, my OP associates, our investors and all of the innovators in pediatric health care for standing together to health good. And we're looking forward to providing an additional update in September during our Investor Day. Operator, let’s open the call for Q&A.

Thank you [Operator Instructions] And our first question will come from Rick Wise with Stifel. Your line is now open. Q – Rick Wise: Hi. Good morning, gentlemen. Let me start trying to think through the guidance and the outlook for the second half, and I'll sort of ask it altogether a little bit. You did have a small beat. I'm trying to understand why no raise, why keep the numbers the same given all the excellence and positive commentary you both had about the outlook for the second half on multiple fronts. And maybe just as part of answering that, you can help us understand what organic growth was this quarter.

Yes. I think from – Hi, Rick, nice to talk to you this morning. Yes, I think we have a very consistent policy of remaining fairly conservative in terms of our guide. I think you can expect organic growth in that high teens or I think around 18% or so if you subtract out the Boston -- the Boston O&P acquisition. And so that's pretty consistent with what we've talked about in 18% to kind of 20% range, always targeting something larger, but something that we're really pleased with to see high-teens growth again. And yes, we have a lot of very positive settings happened in the back half of the year. Obviously, July, August, two of our largest periods. And until we get through the full measure of Q3, I think you will see us remaining fairly conservative despite -- like you said, a multitude of good things that are happening within the business. And so far, what we're seeing is a really, really robust summer season. Q – Rick Wise: Yes. Following up on that, last quarter, you talked about expecting international momentum to continue through the year. And again, back to the -- everything that's going on fundamentally, it sounds really, really positive. It sounds like if I'm hearing you that you're more confident than ever, that the pieces are falling in place to show us better scoli numbers in the second half. Am I being too optimistic? Or what gives you that extra confidence that it really can happen now?

Yes. I think what we're experiencing on the OUS side, at least in terms of the shop in revenue is entirely isolated and has been for the last several quarters to stocking distribution and ordering patterns in South America. And as I think you know, our schools as a business, historically, outside of the United States has only been in a few countries and primarily in South America and in Australia, where pediatric orthopedic surgeons also do pediatric spine surgery. And in markets like Canada and Europe, where it's primarily Pediac spine surgeons who are doing pediatric spine surgery, we don't have as large of a footprint. From our perspective, what we see in terms of demand in the markets where we're strong, Australia was very strong this year -- this quarter, but South America continued to -- I think the only way to describe it is a small business, and it was very choppy. And so generally speaking, when we have fairly low orders in a particular quarter, you can be fairly confident that, that comes back in the next quarter. And so what my commentary on the business overall is that we're seeing growth in markets like Canada and EU. These are all agency markets that are much less. They are very small at this stage, but they're much more stable because they're not through our stocking partners. And as that component of our business grows and it is growing rapidly, most likely over the next several quarters smooth out the revenue that we're seeing in our Scoliosis business international. But we are quite bullish that the second half of the year, even in South America for us will be very strong in terms of the ordering patterns just based on what we're seeing in terms of the usage profile of our surgeon therapy...

Yes. I would just add, Rick, that we know that the procedures in Latin America continue to grow, because we track that debt. Look, the lumpiness we're seeing is when we decide to sell sets to Latin America and us managing our open receivables with our stocking partners down there. And so we need to keep them current on paying for those sets and not get too far ahead of ourselves. So the demand is there. The procedures are happening. Some of the timing of this is us managing our cash positions.

That's great. Very helpful color and great to see the strong US performance. Thanks so much.

Thanks, Rick

Thanks, Rick.

And our next question comes from Ryan Zimmerman with BTIG. Your line is open.

Good morning. Thanks for taking our question. I want to ask about Boston O&P. When you did the deal with them, they were on track to do about $25 million for the year, if I recall. Just first, I want to make sure that that is still the prevailing assumption for the Boston O&P contribution on an annual basis. And the second thing is with the private financing, it sounds like you're accelerating and again, correct me, if I'm wrong here, but you're accelerating kind of your clinic strategy around Boston O&P. And I know we'll get more details in September, but it does feel like maybe that's happening at a more rapid pace. And if that's the case, kind of just how to think about that as we move into 2025.

Yes. I think the $25 million is a solid number, Ryan. We'll stick with that. I think that's really specific to -- again, I always point out that specific to the Boston OMP side of the business, unrelated to the rest of the OPSB franchise that is selling some of the wholesale Boston products as well as Ora Medical or other MDO product portfolio, Ora Medical, and RHINO, these devices. And so we see that component of OPSB here growing very rapidly. I think what you could assume and Ricky said, we'll talk more about in September. But what you could assume is that our assumption heading into the acquisition or after the acquisition of Boston O&P, that there would be a lot of opportunity for us on the clinic expansion side, both in terms of our capacity that open greenfield locations, which we think will take some time just to get licensing setup and facilities set up, but also our capacity to do some small acquisitions that would allow us to maybe speed along that process. And so post acquisition, you've heard us talk very bullish about how things have gone so far. I would just say, we have a lot of opportunity coming at us on the clinic acquisition, clinic expansion side. And so I don't know if I would say that we are accelerating that, at least in terms of what it impact would be in the back half of this year. But certainly, I think the scale of opportunity is -- you can assume that our capital raise here was connected to our -- the scale of opportunities that we think we have in front of us in terms of our capacity to grow the OPS and franchise through clinic expansion. Does that make sense, Ryan?

Yes. Very much appreciate it, and I know we'll get more color in a few weeks. And then maybe turning to scoliosis for a bit, I'm curious, there's been some changes in the market, changes in ownership of some of your competitors. I think about the spine business from our competitors going into a private equity buyer. I'm curious what, if any, impact that has resulted in domestically in the scoliosis market and whether you can capitalize on some of that disruption?

Yes. I think we've tried to be opportunistic. As you well know, the M&A that's occurred there has been all adult companies with very small pediatric spine portfolios. I would say that at least some of the companies that have pediatric products, the opportunity for us to reaffirm our exclusive commitment to pediatric orthopedics and in pediatric scoliosis surgery has been well received by our customer base. We're not going anywhere. We're not changing our focus. We're 100% dedicated to pediatric orthopedic and pediatric scoliosis. And I think that's been followed up by the EOS product development we've done, right? I mean we're focusing on these extremely complex unmet needs that have been underserved by the adult spine companies that dabble in pediatric orthopedics. And so I think the combination of maybe some of that disruption that you're seeing in the adult spine market or maybe there's been a bit of a loss of focus on the few products they had in pediatric spine combined with us basically pushing our chips into the center of the table, telling our customers, we are here to develop and develop products that are the most complex in the most -- in the largest unmet needs. I think that's resonating with our customers. And I think it is continuing day by day, quarter by quarter, building the credibility of our scoliosis franchise. And you heard on the call that response ribbon held, for example, a fairly small product for us, but a very large unmet need in pediatric scoliosis surgery. That product is now being used in some of the premier children's hospitals in the United States. And in some of those locations, there were locations where we otherwise had no strong presence, at least with our response fusion system. And so it is giving us a toll, if not a foothold in some of those facilities, exposing those physicians to the balance of our scoliosis portfolio and then allowing us to tell the story that this is just 1 of 3 very, very unique system. And by the way, in the next 12 months or so, we're going to be delivering you an entirely new fusion system, state-of-the-art, when you combine that with ApiFix, when you combine that with 7D, it's just a really compelling story. And I think that's what's driving surgeon conversions to the entire slowing portfolio in the US.

Yes. That sounds good. I appreciate the color. And again, congrats on all the progress.

Thanks, Ryan.

And the next question comes from Matthew O'Brien with Piper Sandler. Your line is open.

Good morning. Thanks for taking the question. Maybe just to stick with the specialty bracing commentary. Dave, can you talk a little bit about what you're seeing in terms of integrating that business? I mean, it was great to see that came in line as you're still kind of integrating. What kind of successes are you seeing in terms of just capturing maybe new business? I know it's early. And then these two new centers, should we think about those two as on an annual basis being similar in terms of revenue attribution to the business? Or just because they're kind of greenfield can they be much, much bigger than that? And then I do have a follow-up.

Yes. So, just on the scale of those two, I think the -- both of them are probably a similar size, although the Nationwide Children, obviously, one of the largest children's hospitals in the United States. And so having a facility embedded in Nationwide not giving individual fund guidance here, but you would have to think that, that would be pretty substantial for us. We're not seeing patients there yet. It's going to be a little bit. But as you think about the growth driver for 2025, that certain is one. Virginia is just getting started. I think we're seeing a few patients there. But it supports an account there that we have historically not had really strong bracing business with. So, probably not a big impact in the back of half of this year, but certainly a part of our growth story. And when you attach the growth numbers that we expect from those, and you had a few more, you can see how that would be a significant portion of the growth that we would expect in 2021 and beyond. I think from an integration perspective it's -- things have gone extremely well here. I mean, -- it seems like it's staying with -- our organizations culturally have -- yes, it's almost like we're the same company with Boston in terms of we do implants they do non-surgical products. It was a very similar feel that we had with our friends at NDO and how they have well-integrated. The integration efforts have primarily been integrating the balance of the OPSP portfolio. So, NDO, Rhino, and these other products into the Boston business. And I think at this stage, that is essentially done. Things that I think we're still working on R&D. Boston didn't really have an R&D footprint.…

Okay. Got it. Very helpful. And then a question for Fred, I just want to make sure I'm clear on the commentary on EBITDA for next year. Meaningful improvement equivalent to Set Deployment, I think this year, you've talked about a $20 million-ish just under of Set Deployment. Is that about the level we should think about for EBITDA next year? And then, that assumes some pretty meaningful leverage. Can you just talk about some of those leverage points? Thanks.

Yeah. Absolutely. So volume, obviously, is the single biggest leverage point, continued leverage down on the G&A side of things, particularly on the cash portion of those expenses, not leveraging R&D. We will pick up a few, call it, two to three points of additional leverage on the sales and marketing side, just like we have in the last couple of years so all of that with incremental volume drops through very nicely for us next year. And yes, set deployment next year. Again, will be less than that $20 million. And to Dave's comment in the script, we're planning for adjusted EBITDA to cover and pay for that investment in 2025. And then in 2026, the adjusted EBITDA to cover any working capital needs of the growing business and achieving the cash flow breakeven at that point in time.

Outstanding. Thank you.

Thanks Matt.

Thanks Matt.

And the next question comes from Mike Matson with Needham. Your line is now open.

Yeah, thanks.

Hi Mike.

I just want to ask one on the eLLi Growing Rod. So you said, you think you'll be launching out in 12 to 18 months. But do you know what the approval pathway is going to be for that? Is it 510(k), De Novo or PMA? And do you expect to have any requirement for any kind of clinical data there to get that approved?

Yeah. Great question. So the Pediatric "Breakthrough Device" Designation was obviously a huge step for us. And it gives us some confidence that the likely pathway for this would be 510(k). Obviously, there is one other device in the market that has some obviously strong clinical success, but then also some challenges. And so I think the "Breakthrough Device" Designation issued by FDA is recognizing that there is a real need in the market for more devices that can help to change kids' lives or not saves kids' lives. And so we are pretty confident at this stage that based on what we're seeing, based on the interactions that we've had with the FDA and their behavior that this is likely a 510(k), which would give us confidence that, that 12-to-18-month time horizon is a good one. Again, things could change there, Mike, you know that on the FDA. But from our perspective, things could be going better in terms of how we're operating with FDA to get this device approved. I don't believe at this stage that this will require a post-market clinical data or clinical data to get approved, you could assume, though, that we probably will work with some of the large -- whether it's PFSG or one of the large registry groups in pediatrics pond to capture data related to this device. And I think that the clinical condition is so severe and the challenges associated with this procedure is so severe that we want to learn, and we want to make sure that the devices that we're coming out with are making a clinical difference. And so I think that's something that will be extremely well-received. We've already talked to the leaders inside pediatric spine [ph] surgery, and I think that's been well-received by the leaders. So I think it's the right thing for us to do clinically, and it's a rational approach for us commercially as well.

Okay. Thanks. And then just one on the stock repurchase. So you said $5 million. I know it's kind of small, but it is a little unusual to see a company at your stage and the life cycle buying back stock. So maybe just comment on why you've chosen to do that? What the outlook is, it sounded like you were considering maybe doing some additional buybacks as well?

Yes, it's a great question, Mike. So it's really related to the convert. So as you noted, there is no other instruments put in place for a cap call associated with the convert, we looked at additional pricing. We looked at the cap call, and we came up with this idea as a means to effectively get that strike price from up 30 to something like up 50, and so it is directly related to that and nothing else.

Okay. Got it. That makes sense. Thank you.

Thanks, Mike.

And the next question comes from Dave Turkaly with Citizens JMP. Your line is now open.

Hey, good morning guys, and congrats on the recap. Fred, I was just wondering if you could just at a high level remind us of the economics of investing in these new clinics in terms of cash upfront. And then how quickly you think you get a return or a positive ROI on those investments?

Yeah, absolutely. So let's say we're opening a new clinic. Obviously, the first thing we have to do is get support from the surgeons in the hospital, then we have to get support from the hospital administration. We're not going to open one, hoping that buying comes our way. It's going to be guaranteed. We then would either lease some space inside the hospital or very, very near the hospitals. So we have some lease payments, build out that space, which is minimal cost and then hire some clinicians. We think all-in, that's probably $0.5 million of some cost, if you will, before revenue starts coming into the business. And we anticipate that these would be cash flow positive within probably the first three or four months. Again, we're not going to open one unless we're confident revenue is going to come in pretty early. So within three or four months, it's been cash flow positive and starting to pay back on that investment. Obviously, it depends on the size, but we think that would be the average size of a new clinic that can then obviously grow pretty aggressively over the years after that point in time.

Sounds like you got a lot of firepower to go at them now. So that's good to hear. And we didn't talk a lot about enabling technologies on the call. I was wondering you'd give any update on either 70% or FIREFLY and we had a conversation recently with a doc who is, I guess, super excited about how specifically 70 registers and then how it recalibrates. So any thoughts on those businesses and those two parameters would be great. Thanks.

Yes. Good question, Dave. Yes, I think the commentary that you got from Dr. Paulson was fantastic. It was really well executed interview, the surgeon said, I think time to say, and it was really interesting, following your conversation days, there was a podcast that was done by Tazna that some physicians that we are connecting -- well, all the physicians that we're well connected to there had a number of different comments about robotics as well as 7D and Firefly and that same very positive sentiment by a different group of physicians with echo related to Firefly as well as 7D. I mean 7D, has been great for us. Again, it's none of those technologies that opens up doors for us in certain facilities. And the need for radiation sparing or minimal radiation type of navigation is extremely well received in pediatrics. And some of the growth that we're seeing on the response fusion side of our business is directly correlated to some of the placements that we had done in the year previous. And we have a very large hopper of locations that we expect to place units over the course of the next 12 to 18 months, which I think spells well for growth of our fusion franchise in the future. So, both Firefly as well as 7D continued. We're also working, as you well know, through the MedTech Concepts acquisition a few years ago, working on some additional digital health tools that we expect to be beta launched here in the coming few months. And I think when you combine that with the technologies we have on navigation, the whole digital healthcare side of our business, right now, very small, is another very promising source of very profitable growth for us in the out years.

Dave, what's the new certification set you just received?

Yes. So 7D has the capacity now to do fully navigated spine surgery without ECP. So they can do MRI specific registration, MRI specific, they can base their -- the navigation on a preoperative MRI. And that essentially eliminates almost all of the CT or all of the radiation required, and that's a big asset. So we have customers wanting that, as you can imagine. And I think it just shows the power of some really, really innovative technologies by 7D.

Thank you.

Thanks Dave.

And the next question comes from Richard Newitter with Truist. Your line is now open.

Hi. Good morning. This is Ravi Misra in for Rich. Can you hear me okay?

Hi, Ravi. You’re on.

Hey. So, just one question. I want to turn back to -- actually two questions. But first, I'd like to just turn back to guidance. The Street has you at about $38 million for the US in Q3 and you're talking about a normalized surgery environment with robust schedules. And I'm just curious, I appreciate the conservative an aspect here, but can you maybe walk us through any constraints that you might be seeing or macro changes or challenges that might be there that might be adding a little bit more of your conservatism? Or just help us understand kind of why if the US business is -- what appears to be stable or healthy or maybe even improving that, that number is unchanged.

Yes. I think our third quarter is typically our largest quarter, most of that growth -- a lot of that has been July, which we obviously have seen and feel good about. But as Dave mentioned, we're very conservative, and so we beat in the second quarter by some, but not by millions, and so we continue to be conservative in the guidance. We feel good about the third quarter. The thing that is always a wild card for us, particularly in the last two years, is RSV in the fourth quarter, and it's impossible to predict what that will look like. Our guidance today assumes that it's similar to the fourth quarter of last year, but flu season, RSV, can have an impact on the business, and until we get to that point in the year, it's difficult to predict. So we're assuming it's similar to last year, but we don't know what it's going to be like until we actually get to that point. So it's nothing more than us being conservative and trying to make sure that we're not getting ahead of ourselves in the overall guidance.

Great. And then maybe one around long-term strategy and clinic expansion plans. Just trying to understand, you're talking about a pretty significant ramp in EBITDA in 2025 and onwards. But how do we kind of reconcile that against the capital intensity required to stand up new clinics or getting deeper in the trauma and deformity business? I mean, do you guys need more bracing-type products or other kind of portfolio additions to help drive that EBITDA margin expansion? Or is this kind of an underlying growth and kind of emergence of leverage in the business that you're at a revenue point that should be able to support this level of cash flow generation? Thanks.

Yeah. It's truly leveraging the organic growth of the implant side of the business. And as well as the increased ROI on the clinic side of the business. So yeah, we will be putting in place some, if you will, lease build-out costs. We will be deploying sets that the cost of those will show up as depreciation and not negatively impact the adjusted EBITDA. So we're effectively leveraging the sales and marketing line a few points each year, keeping R&D growing with revenue. And then really the leverage is coming from the cash portion of the G&A side of the business. So depreciations, dot-com, amortization, those things will probably continue to grow with the revenue. But the cash portion, which is really the support cost of the businesses, is where the leverage will continue to come from. And with high contribution margins on the bracing side of the business, actually higher contribution rate than the implant side of the business, higher growth there will drop through to nice profitability in the overall business.

Okay. And I am showing no further questions at this time. I would now like to hand the call back over to David Bailey for closing remarks.

Thank you, Michelle, and thanks, everybody, for joining us today on the call. I look forward to seeing many of you and discussing updates in our September ending Day. So thanks for your time, and have a great day.

This does conclude today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.