Good morning, everyone and welcome to the Kaltura Second Quarter 2022 Earnings Call. Please note that this event is being recorded. All material contained in the webcast is sole property of and copyright of Kaltura with all rights reserved. For opening remarks and introductions, I will now turn the call over to Erica Mannion at Sapphire Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you and good morning. With me today from Kaltura are Ron Yekutiel, Co-Founder, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; and Yaron Garmazi, Chief Financial Officer. Ron will begin with the summary of the results for the second quarter ended June 30, 2022 and the trends and areas of focus that are expected to impact the remainder of 2022. Yaron will then review in greater detail the financial results for the second quarter followed by the company’s outlook for the third quarter and full year of 2022. We will then open the call for questions. Please note that this call will include forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws, including, but not limited to, statements regarding Kaltura’s expected future financial results and management’s expectations and plans for the business. These statements are neither promises nor guarantees and involve risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed here. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ from forward-looking statements can be found in the Risk Factors section of Kaltura’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 and other periodic SEC filings, including the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2022 to be filed with the SEC. Any forward-looking statements made in this conference call, including responses to your questions, are based on current expectations as of today, and Kaltura assumes no obligation to update or revise them, whether as a result of new developments or otherwise, except as required by law. Please note we will be discussing a non-GAAP financial measure, adjusted EBITDA during this call. For a reconciliation of this non-GAAP financial measure to the most directly comparable GAAP metric, please refer to our earnings release, which is available on our website at www.investors.kaltura.com. Now I’d like to turn the call over to Ron.

Thank you, Erica and thanks to everyone for joining us on the call this morning. Today, we reported total revenue for the second quarter of 2022 of $42 million, up 1% year-over-year and subscription revenue of $38 million, up 4% year-over-year. Adjusted EBITDA for the quarter was negative $8.5 million. In the second quarter, we resumed sequential growth across a number of metrics, including total revenue, subscription revenue, ARR and RPO and saw leading indicators such as conversion of longer cell cycle deals, sales force productivity and new subscription bookings which we believe supports an expected increase in growth in quarter four. One of the drivers of this increase in demand is the recent commercialization of our event platform. This product transcends our initial event offering that powered mainly large flagship events along with event services to now also power centrally all events of all sizes across the organization with minimal ongoing event services. As an example, during the quarter, we signed several important events deals, including with one of the big four accounting firms. We chose to use our platform to power thousands of internal and external events globally. Elevating and tracking the level of engagement in virtual events is very important for them as they are digitizing their internal and external communication to increase efficiency and productivity, reduce costs and to achieve their net zero emissions goal. In this multimillion dollar deal, our event platform is consolidating and replacing several existing webcasting technologies while providing a high-quality engaging experience with brand consistency across regions and departments and providing insightful and actionable analytics. Beyond our event offering, we also closed video and TV content management and live streaming deals across all of our markets. For example, a major U.S. bank selected Kaltura, signing a multimillion dollar contract to manage…

Thank you, Ron, and good morning, everyone. As I review our second quarter results today, please note that I will be referring to a non-GAAP metric adjusted EBITDA. A reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financials is included in today’s earnings, which is available on our website at www.investors.kaltura.com. Total revenue for the second quarter ended June 30, 2022 was $42 million, up 1% year-over-year. Subscription revenue was $38 million, up 4% year-over-year, while professional services revenue contributed $4 million, down 22% year-over-year. This figure also embodied an approximate revenue reduction of $485,000 as a result of currency headwinds that occurred during the quarter. These headwinds are forecasted to continue and weigh our revenue during the second half of this year as well. The remaining performance obligations were $172.7 million, up 10% year-over-year, of which we expect to recognize 62% of revenue over the next 12 months. Annualized recurring revenue was $151 million, up 4% year-over-year. Our net dollar retention rate was 100% in the second quarter compared to 107% in Q1 2022. Note that this quarter net dollar retention metrics incorporate a full impact of the large customer that, as mentioned in our last earnings call, reduced some of their business with us in the fourth quarter of 2021. This customer has since renewed various existing projects and has partnered with us on new ones. Within our EE&T segment, total revenue for the second quarter was $30.4 million, up 1% year-over-year. Subscription revenue was $28.3 million, up 4% year-over-year, while professional services revenue contributed $2.1 million, down 30% year-over-year. Within our M&T segment, total revenue for the second quarter was $11.6 million, up 2% year-over-year. Subscription revenue was $9.7 million, up 5% year-over-year, while professional services revenue contributed $1.9 million, down 10% year-over-year. GAAP gross profit in the quarter was…

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes with Gabriela Borges with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.

Hi, good morning, thanks for taking the question. Ron, I wanted to start on your comment on the reevaluation of budget. Can you give us a little more color here? How are you seeing the trend difference between M&T versus EE&T? And what are the incremental changes that you’re seeing in the pipeline or the willingness that maybe wasn’t contemplated 3 months ago at the beginning of the year?

So again, I want to make sure I understand the question. It’s not so much about the revaluation of our budget, but more what’s the underlying business trends?

Yes, correct. What you’re hearing from the customers?

Okay. Great. I’d love to do that. Thank you, Gabriela. So first of all, I mean, as mentioned, booking rebounded this quarter to a level that we’ve not seen since Q3 ‘21. I mean that sales force productivity was the highest that it’s been in over 1 year. The EE&T sales reps that are doing new logos, it was as good as it was in 2020. And for the customer success folks, it was back to Q2 ‘21 levels. If you’re looking at the proportion of new logos versus upsells, the new logos picked up again after quite a lot of time that it was more upsells and new logos, new logos was kind of a big push forward. We spoke last time about various deals that have been prolonged and the pipeline building up. And now basically, a lot of them have come together, and a lot of them closed now, and some of them are in advanced discussions for Q3. In the longer cycles that – initially, we said that people were having less urgent stuff like that in COVID to address an immediate need. It’s less about usage. It’s more about thoughtful response to strategic need around video. So it took longer, but we’re seeing these close. An example of that is the move from the flagship events through the new event platform. And we’ve given examples. I’ll give you a couple more about the event platforms that are closing. In any case, demand is coming across all segments. The largest one is still enterprise. Geographically, it’s more or less still the same blend. So in EE&T, it’s mainly North America, followed by Europe and APAC. Media and telecom, most of the bookings this quarter we’re in upsells and not new logos coming from EMEA, then APAC…

Yes, thank you. Thank you for the detail. The other question I have is a little bit of a strategy question, which is you have the offer on the table for an acquisition. We saw the shareholder rights plan press release from earlier in the week – last week. Could you give us an update on how you’re thinking about Kaltura’s [indiscernible] of standalone company versus via potential acquisition?

Yes. Well, you saw the two press releases that we issued out. And insofar as offer, our Board will evaluate the offer in due course as noted. Insofar as the accumulation of shares by sponsor Q1 investment management, that we did adopt a limited duration stockholder rights plan to help them be an equal treatment of all stockholders. We also want to make sure that the Board remains in the best position to just charge our fiduciary duties. It’s an available standard tool for this type of situation, and we’re using it. Obviously, we can’t comment further on the topic at this point, and the Board will provide its feedback in due course.

That makes sense. Thank you.

Thank you.

The next question comes with Matt Niknam with Deutsche Bank. Please go ahead.

Hi, guys. Thank you for taking the question. My question is on adjusted EBITDA. So you’ve mentioned the headcount reductions are expected to drive annualized savings of about $18 million. So I’m just wondering when do you hit that run rate cost savings level? And then ultimately, what does that imply for adjusted EBITDA in terms of just getting back to breakeven or positive timing-wise? And then I have just one housekeeping question as well. You mentioned single-digit cash flow from operations loss. Is that for 2H? Or is that for the full year? I just want to clarify. Thanks.

Matt, it’s Yaron. Thank you for the question. Regarding the actions that we took around reducing our headcount and some other savings, yes, the full impact of the $18 million is going to be as soon as we basically complete the process, which will take us another couple more months probably to do it. We will start to see the fruits of the improvement in profitability in Q4. And even if you are doing the math right now in order to see the adjusted EBITDA that we guided for Q3 and the remaining for Q4, you will see a significant improvement. The full impact will hit us on next year on 2023. And based on the fact that we – as Ron mentioned we see a very nice momentum in bookings and very controlled churn levels, we do believe that we will see the acceleration in revenue continuing to next year. So taking the two line items of the revenue continue to accelerate and at the same time, save at least $18 million on an annual basis, we believe that next year, adjusted EBITDA is going to be in the 1-digit, and we will do our best to take it as close to the breakeven. This is regarding the profitability, especially going to next year. So compared to the number of this year, which is around $30 million, it’s going to go all the way to a negative 1 digit probably for next year. In terms of the cash flow, you will see 1-digit negative cash flow from H2 as a whole. And I can tell you that we started this quarter with a very, very strong collection momentum, which, by the way, some of it was the downside that we saw in Q2, but we feel very comfortable that it’s going to be a mirror situation in H2 compared to where it was in H1 in terms of the cash flow.

If I could just follow-up one other question I had – go ahead, sorry.

Yes. And one more comment the future cash flow, the future – the cash flow is at this point is lagging a little bit [indiscernible] the adjusted EBITDA, as you can see. So as soon as we are improving the adjusted EBITDA going to next year, we do believe that going into 2024, we will be able to take it to a positive territory, at least to breakeven. And as we said before, we are managing our financials in order that we will not need to raise additional cash in the future.

Got it. Got it. And then the follow-up I had is just more around the longer sales cycles. Has that varied at all across verticals, geographies? I’m just wondering if there is any context or is it more of a general statement in terms of macro impacting the base? Thanks.

I think we’ve seen it most in enterprise more so than any other vertical, not so much geographically different, both U.S. and Europe. Part of that was a function or is a function of maybe that rebound post-COVID. Part of it is a function of the fact that we’re moving to an event platform that applies to many more users and as such, requires a more strategic review and further consensus across different buyers. Obviously, the benefit is it’s a much more stickier experience at yearlong and part of it might be related to the current macroeconomic condition. But it’s largely – mostly seen in the enterprise, but it is also seen, to some extent, in education. And media and telecom is always hard to tell because it’s a clunkier business that does not come in the same volume of deals and not the same frequency of deals. And so it’s a bit hard to say.

That’s great. Appreciate the color from both. Thank you.

The next question comes with DJ Hynes with Canaccord. Please go ahead.

Good morning, guys. So Ron, I think at the time of the IPO, the business, just in ballpark terms, was roughly evenly split corporate education and M&T revenue. Would love to get an update like how does that break down today? What are the growth rates of the respective efforts? And how does it each contribute to margins?

So insofar as between the three in EE&T or media and telecom as well? What was the question there?

All three of them. So corporate, education, M&T, I would just get an update on kind of how each is contributing to revenue, what are the growth rates of each business, how do they contribute to margins?

Happy to do that. So in the IPO or at the IPO time, we were looking at about third of the business coming from media and telecom and then somewhere around 30% more or less coming from enterprise and another 30% coming from education, another probably 10% coming from tech OEM side of the business. Insofar as the trends we’ve seen, so I’ll give you an example of this quarter, what we’ve seen now EDU was the fastest year-over-year revenue grower, followed by media and telecom, enterprise, then tech OEM by way of order. If you look by way of bookings, the enterprise was the fastest grower by way of bookings. So it’s a bit of a dance there that sometimes you’re pulling forward, sometimes you’re pulling back. All-in-all, where is the greatest momentum we believe this year, I think the greatest momentum is in enterprise. And the reason is that it is the largest TAM and it is the largest game, and we moved from content management into also supporting events and webinars and the rest of it, this is something that is a big market opportunity for us in the post-COVID world. Insofar as margin structure, you would have seen the improvement on the media and telecom side that they have put up. We said prior that there is going to be the biggest change there, which indeed has been happening. It has become more effective on the recurring subscription revenue with economy of scale in emerging environments as it becomes more sassy and the percentage of professional services have dropped as we become more transactional there. So, we have gained quite a lot of points on gross margin in M&T. There has been a bit of a shrinking of the gross margin on the EE&T side of the business, if you look quarter-by-quarter, not very significant, but a bit there. A big portion of it is as we move more towards live in real time, the cost of goods there for cloud resources, etcetera, are weighing a bit down. The total of it together has caused for an increase in gross margin for the company, which we expect will continue to occur in the quarters ahead of us per the original plan, the multi-year plan that we have provided. What’s interesting, and we said that as it pertains to the restructuring plan, is that while M&T gross margins go up and EE&T went down a bit in both cases, representing their trends in one less professional services and the other a bit more through the events, they become even more similar to each other, which both operationally and financially is a good direction for us as we merge these activities. Does that address your question?

Yes, that’s super helpful color. One follow-up just on the process with K1, I mean can you comment on how much engagement you have had with their team and where the board stands in the evaluation of the offer that’s on the table?

Yes. Obviously, I am not privileged to share that at the moment. We will be in a position to, we will absolutely share it. But thank you for asking.

Okay. Thanks guys.

The next question comes with Michael Turrin with Wells Fargo. Please go ahead.

Hi guys. This is Austin Williams on for Michael Turrin. I just wanted to drill down into the FX headwinds in the quarter and the guide. Is there anything specific that we should be aware of as it relates to currency exposures and how those impacted the full year guide? And conversely, just have you seen a benefit to OpEx as a result of the stronger dollar?

Yes. It’s a great question because obviously, all of us are trying to handle the situation around currency for always. Let me give you a very quick overview. On top line, definitely, there is a pressure on – due to the weakened – weakness of the euro compared to the dollar. We mentioned it in my statement that there was an impact of roughly $0.5 million on Q2 because of the euro compared to the dollar. Definitely, when we build the guidance for the year, we were very thoughtful to where it can go. And there is a negative impact on the rest of the year, but we took it into consideration in the number, roughly close to 30% of our business is coming from Europe. So, there is an impact there. The other side of the coin is that we have some savings coming from the Israeli operation, which, obviously, we are – we have less expenses in terms of dollars based on the fact that dollar is also stronger compared to the Israeli currency. We also took it into consideration in the way that we guided through the rest of the year in terms of the adjusted EBITDA. But as I mentioned to make a long story short, there is a pressure on top line which, by the way, this is one of the main reasons for the fact that we will reduce the numbers for the rest of the year. And from the Israeli shekel, there is some benefit and we already took into consideration in initiating the guidance for the adjusted EBITDA.

That’s great. I just had one follow-up. Dollar-based expansion was down in the quarter. I am just wondering how or if churn is impacting this number. And if you have any thoughts on just where this number can return in the longer term? Thank you.

Yes. I can tell you that gross churn then – the growth churn, other than the impact that we had from the specific customers that we mentioned at the beginning of the year, we are still taking the hit because of this customer that – other than the specific customer, we didn’t have any significant change in our gross retention, so – gross churn. So, it was very similar to the numbers that we had before. So, most of the impact that you see in MDR, which went down some of it came definitely from this specific customer. Other than that, some of the bookings that we had in this quarter despite the fact that, as Ron mentioned, it was a very strong quarter, much stronger than previous quarters. It came at the last part of the quarter in the last few weeks of the quarter and therefore, have a very limited impact on the actual revenue for the quarter. But if you look going forward and we are not guiding for the MDR going forward, at least for the coming – for the near-term, it will probably stay around the same level and will be having there some pressure. But we do believe that we see the path going into back – into the numbers that we had pre-COVID. I would not assume that we will go at this point to the numbers that we saw in COVID, which is close to the 120%. But definitely, we see a path later in the year to go back to the numbers that we had before COVID.

I will just add one point to this, and we said that in the last call when we were throwing what we expect to happen to MDR, and we said it’s going to probably come down. And the reason is that Q2 ‘21 last year is a tougher comparison than Q1 ‘21 given the COVID increases. And so the base by which we are comparing is rising. Conversely, as we look into the continuation of this year, that this starts balancing off. And so at quarter two, it’s a tougher comparison, and we knew the numbers are going to come down.

And the last point is that the euro – regarding your original – the previous question, the euro definitely put some pressure on MDR as well in this quarter compared to last year’s quarter.

The next question comes with Ryan Koontz with Needham & Company. Please go ahead.

Hi. Thanks for the question. Nice to hear about the higher productivity there on the sales front. Any color you can help us understand the adapting go-to-market to this new environment and your kind of near-term tangible opportunities? Any change in sales motion or progress with your partners, your channel partners like AWS, it would be helpful color there? Thank you.

Yes. We are – as I have said, a bunch of deals are closing AWS, they are a good partner. I think it’s the maturity of the event platform is supporting an acceleration here and a good amount of deals are coming from that direction. As I mentioned, it’s a new product that has come to be throughout this year really gave – given birth at the beginning of this year and is now in this quarter in earnest for the very first time contributing in a more significant manner and the same is expected to happen next quarter is quite significant. I would say that a lot of these deals, we said that we have never lost them, but just that they came in and they took longer and then they start closing. We said that the pipeline was getting stronger, and we could see the impact of that. And that’s happening. And so it’s not a big surprise for us. We were waiting for these deals to happen and now they have, and we expect more of that to happen. There is a question, how much of this was more kind of a COVID reflex that was down over the first few quarters and now kind of come back up. Especially as I mentioned, when people move from the immediate need that they had for the next month for an event, for more strategic thought process around when and how they are going to replace the whole infrastructure for the company. And even now, as we get more into questions around IT budgets, the fact that we could replace multiple vendors and do that in a more cost-effective way. That’s really important. So, I think that’s all leading towards higher productivity. We expect that to continue to be…

Got it. And that success with the events platform, is that primarily coming from enterprise versus tech or OEM or anything like that?

All of them are consuming it. And the tech OEM, we are actually supporting folks that are looking to insert components of that into their capabilities. So, we have some very interesting cycles there. On the education front, we have multiple schools that have taken our event platform. I mean one thing to note is we generally think about events and where events could go and what’s events is about, events are a lot of different things. Events is internal and external. It’s marketing. It’s customer education. It’s training and executive communication. It’s all the way from small webinar to user group, to digital gathering, to trade shows. And the way we built the product that actually touches all these different things across spectrum. So, as we look into the future, one, there is an immense benefit to market peers for using these virtual event platforms more so than physical just events in terms of reach and cost and data and stuff like that, then the budgets, as we said, post-COVID that are lower and that could apply. And generally, if there is a recession, that’s going to be probably more effective. So, we see that used in a lot of different places. We think it kind of brings together the best of what we could offer. It’s a dramatic shift for the company compared to what we were a couple of years ago and it’s a multiyear move and we are completing it. The reason we continue to invest over the last couple of years was to get to this point. And I think we are now at a point that enables that.

Got it. Thanks Ron.

Thanks.

[Operator Instructions] The next question comes with Patrick Walravens with JMP Securities. Please go ahead.

Alright. Great. Thank you. I mean so Ron it’s been a rough go so far as a public company. There are some green shoots. But just big picture, as CEO, what do you think is the best way for Kaltura to maximize shareholder value?

That’s important question then. Thank you, Pat. Look, at the end of the day, the goal of any company is to create free cash flows and to create profits and to be able to distribute these profits over time. Obviously, you need to strike the right balance between growth and profitability, which we are attempting to do. It’s different things and different times. It’s not always the same balance. I think we have now adjusted that balance and we are going into a thoughtful growth and more profitable growth into the future. I think the – it was important for us to have moved from the smaller pond of content management into the larger pond of additional real-time and events, etcetera, just because the world is converging. It’s not that we pick a different fight. It’s all the vendors are coming to offer an end-to-end solution that’s real deal and real-time into these use cases. So, I think that kind of electron jump that we needed to have done was important to invest in the potential of the company in the next few years. I think now that we are coming to be with the right product set, we need to more quickly come back to what we have done before, which is to show profitable growth. I think this has not been a typical year. COVID was in a typical year, but the year after COVID has not been for the industry and for us. There obviously have been a few specific things that pertain to Kaltura. There is a lot of things that are beyond specific. And I think that regression to the mean is a powerful force and things are going to come back, and we are seeing them come back. Like I said, we have leading indicators to talk about, productivity and above booking. And so we believe that we are going to be able to come back to profitable growth.

Okay. I mean do you think that evaluating your strategic options should also be part of that?

That’s always the case, and it’s always been considered at any given time. Whatever is right to the shareholders being looked at, it’s not a strategy in itself or by itself. But if your question is, are we evaluating the current deal, it’s on the table. Will we be evaluating other options that’s our job and we will always be doing it for sure.

Okay. Thank you.

It appears we have got no further questions. So, this concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like now to turn the conference back over to Ron Yekutiel for any closing remarks. Please go ahead.

Just want to thank you all again for your time and support and hopefully a continued healthy and successful year for everybody. Take care. Bye-bye.

This conference is now concluded. Thank you for attending today’s presentation. You may now disconnect. Have a good day.