Thanks, David. And by the way, your audio was a little garbled, so I think I got your questions. I'll let Vaseem talk to the conversion rate stuff. But when it comes to the clinical data and what we're seeing, you know, I think the biggest impact of it is it's, you know, everybody knows that an external defibrillator works. We've proven that patients will wear our device for extremely long periods of time if necessary. So the remaining question was around risk, and, you know, our competitor recently published a big German study, which was a national registry, and it was really a study that was trying to identify what the risk of cardiac arrest was in these patients, including the non-ischemic cardiomyopathy patients. So now on top of that 19,000 patient study, we come in with a 21,000 patient study that has, among other metrics, that data, and it confirms that risk level in an entirely different healthcare system, the United States system. So now we have two different countries, two different systems that are both saying the same thing about the risk of these patients, especially in the first 90 days. That's the eye-opener for these clinicians. They're saying, I didn't realize the risk was that great. And that's leading them, you know, to assess the decisions that they're making about WCDs. It is early. We're just getting started with the data, but the early returns are certainly positive. Vaseem, you want to talk a little bit about the impacts of insurance coverage and in-network and conversion rates, etcetera?