Thank you for standing by. My name is Rochelle, and I will be your operator today. At this point, I would like to welcome everyone to the Q2 2025 KVH Industries, Inc. Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] I will now turn the call over to Anthony Pike, Chief Financial Officer. Please go ahead.

Thank you, operator. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us today for KVH Industries' second quarter results, which are included in the earnings release we published earlier this morning. Joining me on the call is the company's Chief Executive Officer, Brent Bruun. Before I get into the numbers, a few standard statements. Firstly, if you would like a copy of the earnings release, or if you would like to listen to a recording of today's call, both will be available on our website. And if you are listening via the web, please feel free to submit questions to ir@kvh.com. Further, this conference call will contain certain forward-looking statements that are subject to numerous assumptions and uncertainties that may cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed in these statements. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any of these statements. We will also discuss adjusted EBITDA, which is a non-GAAP financial measure. You will find the definition of this measure in our press release as well as a reconciliation to comparable GAAP numbers. We encourage you to review the cautionary statements made in our SEC filings, specifically those under the heading Risk Factors in our Q2 2025 Form 10-Q, which will be filed later today. The company's other SEC filings are available directly from the Investor Information section of our website. Now to talk you through the highlights of our second quarter, I'll turn the call over to Brent.

Thank you, Anthony, and good morning, everyone. Our second quarter results reflect our successful ongoing efforts to transform our business model and operations. Compared to the first quarter of this year, revenue was up. Adjusted EBITDA is up and our subscriber base is up, up more than 8%, resulting in more than 8,000 subscribing vessels for the first time. Looking at our high-level results in more detail, our revenue declined year-over-year in the second quarter to $26.6 million, primarily due to the loss of revenue from our VSAT airtime service, which includes the loss of the U.S. Coast Guard. However, we returned to sequential airtime and service revenue growth for the first time since the second quarter of 2023. This led to a $1.2 million increase in total revenue over our first quarter 2025 results. Airtime gross margin rose more than 4% sequentially, and our adjusted EBITDA rose to $2.7 million, a $1.7 million increase compared to the first quarter. We also shipped more than 1,300 communication terminals for the second consecutive quarter. These shipments included Starlink terminals, ongoing orders for our TracNet and TracFone VSAT and OneWeb terminals. By delivering on our strategic initiatives, we believe we have reached an inflection point in our transition from a GEO-based hardware and service company to a multi-orbit LEO- focused service provider. For the first time, the increase in our LEO revenue more than offset the decline in revenue from our legacy VSAT business. Starlink terminals and service demand remains strong across the commercial maritime and leisure marine markets during the second quarter. We're also rapidly expanding our Starlink land sales, especially in Latin America, to support schools, villages and other municipal and commercial facilities. We remain on target to deplete our prepaid Starlink data pool by year-end as planned. The prepaid…

Thank you, Brent. As a reminder, I would like to note that similar to our call for Q1, I will not restate data that is in the earnings release I clearly described in our 10-Q. I will focus my comments on information that either elaborates on or clarifies the published data. So with respect to our second quarter financial results, airtime gross margin, which is not reported in our earnings release, was 35.8%, which as Brent mentioned, is up more than 4% compared to the prior quarter gross margin of 31.5%. Excluding depreciation, our airtime gross margin for the second quarter was 46.4% compared to 44.1% in the prior quarter. This increase was partly driven by the ongoing change in airtime revenue mix between LEO and GEO, with LEO, which has stronger margins, continuing to grow to become a larger portion of our revenue. However, there was also a positive impact from the lower GEO bandwidth capacity costs, which may rise slightly in the second half of the year. Total subscribing vessels at the end of Q2 were just above 8,000, which, as Brent mentioned, is 8.3% up from the prior quarter and 13.5% up from the beginning of the year. Reported Q2 product gross profit was $0.3 million compared to breakeven in the prior quarter. And we continue to expect product margins to be relatively modest as the real value of our mobile connectivity hardware shipments is the airtime revenue they generate in the future. The Q2 operating expenses of $9.5 million was $0.2 million or 2% lower than the prior quarter and $1.7 million or 15% lower than the second quarter 2024 on a like-for-like basis, excluding nonrecurring charges. Our adjusted EBITDA for the quarter was $2.7 million, and our earnings release had the usual reconciliation of that.…

[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Chris Quilty with Quilty Space.

Some good progress in the quarter. You didn't give the total number of activated Starlink terminals, which you have done in the past. Where did you finish out the quarter in terms of net adds in total?

I'll turn that question over to Anthony.

Yes. I'll just get you the -- so in terms of total new Starlink stand-alone additions in the quarter -- bear with me one second. We were up to about 2,500 stand-alone, but we do have an awful lot, which were included as hybrids, which I think we quote as combined previously. So all in, it was just short of 4,000.

Is that the question? Or was it -- I think he asked how many activations? Can you clarify, Chris, please?

Yes. Activations also would be great.

Yes. So on activation -- so activation is clearly on a terminal basis because of costs, and we count vessels and terminal separately now. So that's -- the number for that for the quarter.

Yes. I guess, excuse me, for intervening. It gets a bit irrelevant because it's going to skew the numbers if we have more than 2 terminals on board a vessel. So I think you can just back into the net adds, Chris, based on what we provided previously.

Fair enough. And I think you mentioned when you added those OneWeb units, it was using AgilePlans. Does that mean you still have -- you've sort of shifted the AgilePlan onto OneWeb? And are you doing that for Starlink also or just OneWeb because of the higher cost of the terminal?

We do offer it for Starlink, but with the cost of the terminal in mind, many -- most customers choose to purchase the units.

Got you. And the customers who are purchasing OneWeb, how do they differ from your Starlink subscribers? And what are you seeing in terms of network service and performance?

Yes. The network is performing well. As I'm sure you're aware, they don't have complete global coverage. So it definitely opens up the door to have a hybrid solution until they get their complete global coverage. And as far as the differentiation, it's just more of customers wanting diversity from Starlink. There's no real rhyme or reason to why they would choose one over the other from our perspective.

Understand. Anthony, you mentioned that the GEO costs may go up in the second half of the year. I thought those were relatively fixed over the course of the year. Or are there new coming costs on?

No. They are, I'd just say, broadly fixed. What we were saying there is that we had a slight dip in the cost in Q2. And so Q3 and Q4 might be slightly higher than Q2, but the overall cost for the year is fixed. And I think we've discussed previously our commitments to disclosing following in our 10-K filing.

Understand. And when you look at the margin outlook, are you still -- and this is on the service margin, are you still targeting that sort of 35% to 40% range? Or what are you seeing in terms of the mix changes between OneWeb, Starlink and legacy GEO products?

So I think we are certainly looking to keep in the range you described. But as we said in the prepared remarks, really, what's happening is as LEO becomes a bigger proportion of the overall airtime revenue, that's driving the margins a little bit. And obviously, as the GEO revenue declines with a fixed broadly, a significant amount of fixed cost in the cost of sales for GEO, that's going to put pressure on the GEO margin. But the 2 broadly offsetting each other, we're hopeful to retain in that sort of range that you described.

Great. And I think for -- you said the renewal or you're in discussions with your prepurchase on Starlink, so 2 questions. One, do you anticipate doing the same with OneWeb? And number two, as you look at the prior deal you cut with Starlink, how has the market or market demand changed for their pricing plans? And do you -- in other words, do you anticipate a similar sort of arrangement? Or has the planned pricing changed significantly that this deal might look significantly different?

We're not at liberty to discuss the OneWeb, what price we might be doing with them. And we're also quite limited to what we can say in regard to Starlink. What I will say is that the terminal access charge that they've introduced to all end users will be included in our follow-on.

And is that a onetime access charge? Or is that done on a monthly basis?

It's a monthly charge.

Got you. And presumably, that would just accrue to the gross margins directly?

It's a part of our cost.

Well, it's a cost to the customer that you're adding on.

I'm not quite sure I understand the question, maybe.

Yes. No, exactly. Can you just clarify that question, Chris?

So the access charge to the customer is a monthly fee you're charging for access to the network. Is that how you're classifying it?

Yes. I mean there's no big secret here. If you go to the Starlink website, they clearly show what plans they offer and how it works. So it's an incremental charge, but they've also -- at the lower end, they've changed the pricing at the lower end from a pure -- on a per gigabyte basis. But when you put the access charge on top of that, it gets you back to about where they were at the lower end.

So I think, Chris, it will increase revenue and margin, and gross profit would be fairly flat in a dollar sense, which will inevitably drive down the margin percentage ever so slightly. But obviously, the terminal access charge is a fairly small portion of general ARPUs, which can drive the margin percent down a great deal.

Got it. And are you seeing any changes in the plans that your customers are choosing over time?

Not necessarily. It's been pretty consistent as far as the split.

Got it. A question on CommBox. It looks like you've had good growth in that. But what type of attachment rates are you seeing with subscribers and where do you think you will get to in the longer term?

The attachment rate right now is 1/8. And last quarter, it was much higher than that, right? So we disclosed that we have over 1,000 subscribers. I don't know if we did disclose that. How many -- we disclosed the percentage increase? It's right around it. It's right around 1,000. So we have about 8,000 vessels. We would anticipate that growing quite a bit as a percentage because of the interest of what's going on, because of the need for hybrid solutions, the need for the secure suite. So the attachment rate on a go-forward basis on a quarterly basis of new activations from a commercial maritime perspective should be close to anywhere from 1/4 to 1/2 of our customers, but that's a bit of guesswork on my part.

Got it. And maybe a final question here on just the end market. Obviously, you don't see a huge impact from tariffs, but have you seen any changes in customer demand or patterns in sort of global shipping that are impacting the take-up rate in your view?

We haven't seen any impact.

Got it. And the overall commercial maritime market in terms of container rates and fuel prices and everything relatively stable from your perspective?

At this point, yes. Just one point of clarification, Chris. I overstated the number of CommBox subs out there by a bit. It's actually closer to about 600, 700 at the end of the quarter, but it's a number that we look at every day.

That concludes our Q&A session. I will now turn the call back over to Anthony Pike for closing remarks.

Well, just to thank, everyone, really for joining the call. And if anyone has any follow-up questions, please feel free to reach out at ir@kvh.com. Thank you.

Thank you.

Gentlemen, that concludes today's call. Thank you all for joining. You may now disconnect.

Okay. Thank you.