Good afternoon. Thank you for joining us today to discuss LifeMD's results for the third quarter ended September 30, 2025. Joining the call today are Justin Schreiber, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; and Marc Benathen, Chief Financial Officer. Following management's prepared remarks, we will open the call for a question-and-answer session. Before we begin, I would like to remind everyone that during this call, the company will make a number of forward-looking statements, which are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. These risks and uncertainties are described in the company's 10-K and 10-Q filings, and within other filings that LifeMD may make with the SEC from time to time. Forward-looking statements made during this call are based on current information available to the company as of today, November 17, 2025. The company assumes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements after today's call, except as required by law. Also, please note that management will be discussing certain non-GAAP financial measures that the company believes are important in evaluating LifeMD's performance. Details on the relationship between these non-GAAP measures to the most comparable GAAP measures and reconciliations thereof can be found in the press release issued earlier today. Finally, I would like to remind everyone that today's call is being recorded and will be available for replay in the Investor Relations section of the company's website. Now I'd like to turn the call over to LifeMD's CEO, Justin Schreiber. Please go ahead.

Thank you, and good afternoon, everyone. After the market closed, we issued a news release announcing our third quarter financial results and posted an updated corporate presentation on our website at ir.lifemd.com. LifeMD made considerable progress executing on our strategic plan in the third quarter. Our RexMD business returned to growth adding approximately 10,000 net new subscribers, and our weight management offering has stabilized and is now well positioned for significant growth in 2026. We also continued to deliver strong year-over-year performance with telehealth revenue up 18% and adjusted EBITDA increasing 30% compared to the prior year period. That said, the most exciting thing about LifeMD today is not our past performance or even the results this quarter, but the important foundational steps we have taken to set the company up for an exceptional 2026. During and following the third quarter, we made substantial progress on our women's health and behavioral health offerings, two verticals that we believe have the potential to each become 9-figure businesses over the next 3 years. We also advanced the development of our LifeMD+ membership and in-app health marketplace, which we expect will meaningfully enhance patient experience, deepen engagement and strengthen long-term retention. In addition, we secured regulatory approval for our nonsterile 503-A compounding pharmacy, a major milestone that will dramatically expand our ability to produce personalized medications at scale and a significantly improved economics compared to relying on third-party pharmacy partners. We were also pleased to successfully divest our majority interest in WorkSimpli. This transaction strengthened our balance sheet and allows us to operate as a pure-play virtual care and pharmacy company. While it was a difficult decision, the opportunity in front of our core business is so substantial that we felt it was essential to dedicate 100% of our focus and resources to…

Thank you, Justin. Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for your flexibility as we rescheduled this call from November 6 to today. Our third quarter telehealth business results were solid with year-over-year growth of 18% in revenue and 30% in adjusted EBITDA. Our Rex business rebounded from its late second quarter lows with a net gain of 10,000 new members in the third quarter. We've also executed initiatives to significantly strengthen our balance sheet, including the divestiture of our majority ownership position in WorkSimpli and the payoff of all of our debt. Following these transactions, LifeMD has the strongest balance sheet and liquidity position in the company's history. This will enable us to operate from a position of strength in 2026 as we continue to invest in scaling our core offerings, plus further diversifying our platform through growth and recently launched offerings. Now turning to third quarter numbers. Consolidated revenue grew 13% versus the year ago period to $60.2 million. Telehealth revenue increased 18% to $47.3 million with telehealth adjusted EBITDA growing 30% to $2.9 million. Telehealth subscriber growth remained strong with the number of active subscribers increasing 14% year-over-year to over 310,000 at quarter end. Gross margin for the third quarter was 88%, a decline of 290 basis points versus the prior year due to revenue mix. Gross profit was $52.8 million, an increase of 9% from the year ago period. Telehealth gross margin was 86% as compared to 89% in the year ago period, driven by the revenue mix. Our GAAP net loss attributable to common stockholders for the third quarter of 2025 was $4.6 million or a loss of $0.10 per share. This compares with a GAAP net loss attributable to common stockholders for the third quarter of 2024 of $5.4 million or a loss of $0.13…

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from David Larsen with BTIG.

Congratulations on a good quarter. Can you talk a little bit about the mix of telehealth product revenue, especially in like weight loss, like how much is coming from branded scripts? How much is coming from compounded scripts? There was obviously a sequential decline. Just any color of why that happened? Just any thoughts around 2026 in the obesity health sort of product line.

Yes. David, this is Marc. I'll let Justin take the second part of the question on go-forward product strategy. As far as the revenue mix, so weight management still is more than 50% of the company's total revenue mix. Yes, there was a slight sequential decline that we had quarter-on-quarter. The subscriber base was roughly flat. It was down about 1,000 quarter-on-quarter, although that has stabilized and looks to be stable through the balance of Q4 and then with some of the product innovation in 2026 should return back to growth levels. The biggest, I'd say, mix-wise, as far as new patient sign-ups, we're seeing more than half of them coming in through branded therapy. It's less than half of the total revenue because that -- the new patient base obviously needs time to build up relative to the existing base on the patients that are coming through branded therapy of which obviously, there's a substantial portion at this point. As we mentioned, we -- the only real difference in the economics is the fulfillment fee that was on the personalized compound. So obviously, we do lose that. That was roughly -- for the majority of the time period was roughly about $50 in orders. So we have had some impact from that. That we expect to have some additional impact in Q4, which is reflected in the guidance that we put out today. And then we expect ourselves, particularly with a lot of the product innovation going on in the market and where we're positioned with our collaboration partners to be able to capitalize upon pretty solid growth heading into next year.

This is Justin. I'll just add quickly on 2026. I mean there are 2 big things that we expect to drive the weight management business. The first, as we emphasized in the call, is better pricing for branded therapies, which, as you know, we've made a kind of big investment in. And so I think you're already seeing the writing on the wall there. I also think that as pricing for the cash pay programs comes down, I think you'll see more and more payers covering these medications. We've also, obviously, seeing the outline of a program for Medicare to cover these drugs, which is also something that LifeMD is set up for. So I mean we're generally like really, really positive on 2026. The other -- like the other big thing that would help us would be the Trump administration doing something. And I think this is likely, not just possible, but likely that as these -- as the branded therapies that are FDA approved become more affordable to patients, I think it is highly likely that you see FDA crack down on compounding, which would be an amazing thing for our business if FDA were to slow that down. Right now, we're getting beat up every single day by just a lot of these very low-priced semaglutide and tirzepatide offers out there that are all compounded, and it's very difficult for us to compete in that kind of a marketplace.

So Justin, I think you had been talking at one point about the percentage of new obesity health members coming on the platform in December of '25, expected to be around either 50% or 75%. Does that -- is that still true, like the majority of new patients are on branded products?

Yes. I mean that's what Marc just said. I don't have the precise number as of the last 30 days, David. But I mean, I still think that, that range is certainly extremely likely. I think we're at the lower end of that range now. But I think as these prices come down and especially when the initial doses come down into the $200 to $300 range per month, it makes it very competitive with a lot of the other compounded offers that are out there. So I mean, I think you easily could see that number going to 75% or even higher in the very near future.

Okay. That's very helpful. And then in terms of your coverage, your insurance coverage like Medicare, Medicaid, commercial, just I mean, it seems to me like now that Medicare and Medicaid apparently will cover these branded products in 2026. I'm not sure when that's going to start in '26, but assuming that it does happen, I mean, it seems like that could be a significant revenue stream for you. What portion of your revenue now is, I guess, Medicare or Medicaid or insurance covered versus cash pay? And by the end of '26, what percentage of your revenue do you think will be insurance related?

Yes, I mean, Dave, I'm not really prepared to -- Marc nor I are prepared today to give you an exact number for -- on a percentage by the end of '26. What I can say is that we are 100% ready to go with Medicare once these drugs are covered. So I think that's going to be a very significant thing for our business. And we have actually been seeing -- I don't think traction is the right word, but like we did turn on -- we have right now, it's somewhere between 100 -- I think it's somewhere between 100 million and 150 million lives under coverage right now. And we actually turned this on for the first time broadly last week. And we saw over a 1/3 reduction in our CPA. So it actually is a very, very positive thing for acquisition costs. So I think that -- I don't want to say I think, but the team at LifeMD is really energized around this. It's one of our differentiators. It's been frustrating how long it's taken for us to get these programs live. But I think that also speaks to like the difficulty for others that try to launch a 50-state payer network, right? So I think it's going to be a very positive thing for the business. And I'm really hopeful that we'll start to see that in the coming quarters and be able to talk in more detail about that becoming a greater share of our patients.

Any sense for what percentage of the members that are on your platform now actually have insurance? Or what percentage that would -- that perhaps don't join the platform, don't because they wanted insurance, but now that you take it, they can join in '26? Just any -- can you put some numbers or anything around the potential lift in revenue we might see with insurance coverage?

Well, I can tell you, Dave, a decent percentage, I mean almost at least 25% of patients that sign up for our program end up not continuing with the program because they don't have insurance coverage for the medication. So that's a big thing. And as coverage increases these medications, it's going to be a massive thing for our business. So on the care side, I think it's significant. I mean I think that -- look, I mean, the stat I just gave you, we saw a 33% ballpark reduction in customer acquisition costs when we turned on the ability to use your health insurance for like, I don't know, 1/3 of the population, probably even less. So I mean that's a great sign. Like there's massive demand out there. And that once we get these programs live and functioning the way we need them to function of scale, like it actually will have a really positive repercussion on the overall business.

And then just one more before I hop back in the queue. Can you talk about your clinical services and your retention levels amongst members? So let's say these GLP-1s go solid oral in early '26. Like the value that LifeMD brings to members that, say, for example, an Amazon would not or a typical like Costco maybe would not. Can you maybe just talk about the value you bring and the retention levels or the weight loss that your members typically see that they may not see otherwise at a different platform?

Sure. So I mean, some of the other partners like the Costcos of the world are going to have these drugs inventory, just like I think it's pretty likely at some point that LifeMD will be able to direct ship these medications as well from our pharmacy directly to patients. So not a big differentiator there. Where I think there is a really big differentiator is in the portfolio of services and products that LifeMD offers. So the way I envision it, Dave, is like people may come to LifeMD and -- or they make as an alternative to Costco or their family Doctor's office, they start with -- they typically start with an amazing visit with a state license provider, and they're going to use that to access -- initially, the goal might be to access the GLP-1 medication and use their insurance for the pharmacy coverage maybe even use their insurance to cover the cost of the visit. But no one has one need. And most people that are using a GLP-1 have many other health needs, whether it's preventative care, whether it's lab work for -- it could be something that most of these people have never had a provider speaking to them about their hormone health. LifeMD is also launching a cardiovascular offering in late this quarter, early January, which is going to be an incredible program. There's an incredible shortage right now of cardiologists throughout the country. So we're very excited about that. The ability to get a different medication. So we obviously don't compound GLP-1 medications, but we have a full-blown compounding pharmacy here that if somebody needs a hormone or a dermatology product, we can compound that at a fair price, ship it directly to them. So like this is the type of thing that I think many of these other retailers that you mentioned, I don't want to name names, but I think they would all love to have this type of marketplace and even the brand associated with that marketplace. So that's going to be the big difference between LifeMD and these other places. Also it's worth pointing out that Costco doesn't have a doctor or a nurse practitioner, like they don't have the provider that can write the script. So you can go pick up your drug at Costco or some other or CVS, right? But like you still need a provider. And that's where LifeMD comes into play. I think with Amazon, you obviously get the provider. But look, there's a big difference in the LifeMD brand and Amazon's brand. And there are certainly people that are going to be very loyal to Amazon. And -- but it's a big space, right? I mean there's going to be room for a number of high-quality players in this market.

Great. And last one, Marc, was there any revenue impact from that, I guess, restatement, we'll call it? Was there a -- would revenue have been $4 million higher? Or was it -- there was no impact?

No. So it was not a restatement, it was a revision. The revision had a $1.1 million impact on this year. However, the revisions were made in the quarters that they applied to. So there was no impact to this quarterly results from it.

We'll now move on to Steven Valiquette with Mizuho.

So I think you kind of touched on this a little bit, but I guess I was kind of curious just also on kind of like the brand uptake, how that's going to track relative to your expectations. You gave some comments on less than half is still on brand. But I guess what kind of jumps out to me is just the fact that since you guys announced your brand drug partnership deals with Novo back in April and May, we've seen Novo Nordisk sign partnership deals for low-cost branded drive with a whole bunch of other companies in the virtual care space and pharmaceutical supply channel. So I'm wondering if some of those deals have diluted your expected uptake in any way, some of those other deals actually helped you in some ways again. Just trying to get a better sense of your ability to capture your fair share of customers seeking the lower-cost brand drugs in the weight management category and diabetes, too.

Sure. This is Justin. I'll answer that. So I think we knew that Novo and Lilly would do multiple deals. I think -- look, I don't think that them collaborating with other retailers and pharmacies and telehealth companies has an impact on the demand or the take rate on -- or the conversion rate on our platform. I think it's all about -- I think -- and I can tell you that I'm pretty sure they agree with me. Look, I think it comes down to price. And in a world where FDA ignores what's happening in the compounding world, and you can go out there and get a compounded therapy for, I don't know, even half the price or more a lot of times of what -- where the branded therapies are priced. It just makes it really difficult. And the competitiveness of even the compounding world, something that we didn't expect as -- since these drugs have come off of -- since these drugs have come off the shortage list, the number of players out there, the number of direct marketing firms that are competing in the compounded GLP-1 world has skyrocketed. I don't have an exact number, but it's just gotten -- we expected it to get better, and it actually just got a lot worse and a lot more competitive. So when people are seeing a branded therapy that's priced at $349 to $499, they're seeing -- while they're purchasing and immediately after they purchase while they're waiting for a visit, right, they're seeing 10, 20 other ads, right, for these drugs sometimes as low as $99 for the first month. And usually, the prices quickly escalate, a lot of times in ways that aren't clearly disclosed to the consumer. But that's the current landscape. So we're really optimistic about branded therapy continuing to -- these branded therapies continuing to like perform on our platform. I think there's a big demand. We think the price point, they need to be in the $200 to $300 range to be competitive with a lot of these offers. We need to see better coverage. We think oral therapies, and I mean, most importantly, we think that the Wegovy pill that's likely to be launched in January is going to be -- could be a massive catalyst for the business. And so that's kind of where we're at today.

We'll now move to Anderson Schock with B. Riley Securities.

So first, on the return to RexMD growth, how much of this volume has been driven by the men's HRT offering versus the ED business returning to historical levels? And how does ED patient acquisition outlook compared to historic levels? I know you previously mentioned it was back to around 80% to 90% of historic levels as of the call in August.

Yes. This is Marc. Most of the growth, so the 10,000, about 8,000 came from the sexual health business, which is mostly ED. The balance of it came from a mix of the HRT business, hair loss and insomnia. As far as the acquisition volume, I mean, the acquisition volume is very close to where it was at historical levels. I'd say the caps are about $5 to $10 higher than what they had been, but still healthy unit economics comparable to where they have been, and the levels are very close to where they have been historically.

Got it. And then telehealth's gross margin declined around 350 basis points. Could you provide some more color on what drove this? And how should we think about the telehealth?

Yes. So this is Marc. Nothing in the business drove it. Like-for-like product lines or service lines, the margins are the same, but it was really -- it was a couple of fold. One, as we mentioned, we're shifting more to branded product in the weight management business. That branded product, obviously, doesn't carry with it some of the medication processing or medication processing fulfillment fees that we had on the personalized compounds. That contributed probably about 150 basis points of that change. And we had always mentioned that before when we had spoken about the change from compounding to branded. The balance of the rest of it is mix in business. So today, weight management is over 50% of the company's total revenue. If you were to flip back a year ago, Rex was the biggest part of our revenue. Rex, particularly Rex sexual health will have the highest gross margins that will sit in the upper 80s. So the mix in that business and the shift there contributed to the rest.

Okay. Got it. And how should we think about the telehealth margins going forward with the new offerings in women's and behavioral health and also as you scale the 503-A compounding pharmacy?

Yes. So in general, we would expect gross margins on a rate basis to probably be slightly below where they are today. And the reason for that is a fewfold. One, mental health is a big area of opportunity for us, which will be very accretive to the company's top line and bottom line. But with that being said, gross margins in that business are not going to be 85% to 87% or so. They are going to be lower. They'll typically have a 7 in front of them from a gross margin standpoint, which is if you operate very well, which we do operate our business very well. Secondly, some of the compounded offerings, the gross margins will be slightly lower even after we transition. Although after we transition fully to our pharmacy, they'll probably get back to where the generic is or very close there. But in the interim, there will be -- the gross margins will be slightly lower and we expect that ratio shifting to branded therapy and weight to continue to go up and up to gross margins under current arrangements today where the product is a complete pass-through to the end customer, that would also have a mild impact on gross margins. All of these businesses, we do expect to be accretive to the bottom line and they all have massive ability to scale and growth opportunities. Some of them have lower advertising costs than some other businesses that we've been in. So there are puts and takes there. But from a pure GM rate standpoint, we would expect a mild erosion in the rates just due to mix of business.

We'll now move on to Sarah James with Cantor.

Earlier, you mentioned turning on insurance broadly last week and you talked about an observation of customer acquisition costs being down 33%. I'm wondering if you have any other observations from turning it on broadly. And then just if you could clarify the 33%, was that the lower cost of customers with insurance coming on? Or was it that the cost per customer, customer acquisition costs for those with insurance would be even lower and you just had a big mix shift to those with insurance.

Sarah, it's Justin. I'll take that one. Look, I think what it demonstrates -- I think what it demonstrates is that a lot of patients that are coming through the medical intake process that have clicked on LifeMD ad or business because it's something they sell on TV. I think it just demonstrates that a lot of these -- a lot of people like want to use their insurance for health care. And one of the unique things about the platform that we have that is still mostly synchronous is that we can participate in the benefits world. So it's just a function of more people getting through the flow, being able to check the insurance route versus the self-pay route, obviously, they're seeing a lower price point as well if they choose the insurance route. So there's also like a kind of exercise that we need to go through to kind of rework the financial model and see how that all plays out. But it was super encouraging and I think there's a lot more optimization that we could do as well. And so where I get really excited about this, especially is things like Medicare where if you have broad coverage for these drugs, and we know we're going to get paid for a consult, and it's really just about the patient going through the initial benefits verification process. And then you have the visit and the medication that are covered and then we can ship the medication directly from our pharmacy to the patient. I think that's super exciting. And I think it just -- I think we've always known that this would have a big impact. We were just pleasantly surprised to see that it was that big of an impact without optimizing it more.

Great. And the new consumer-facing app and website that you're launching, do you have any thoughts on how that could impact cross-selling ability?

Yes. I mean it's massive. I mean, the number of kind of cross-care sign-ups per day. I mean I think it could easily be 50 or 100 consults per day off the bat and various care programs without us doing any work except for just the technology functioning. So I'm really excited about it. I mean, I think I know that it has the -- I know that it's the potential to like totally change the profile of the business. And also just totally LTV and retention rates across the business. So it's been a big effort and the new app is going to be beautiful. It's going to look -- I mean, I think our current app looks good. But what we're launching is just leagues ahead of where we are today. And I think it's going to have a big impact on the brand and also on the cross-care rate and ultimately the LTV for the business.

We'll now move on to Yi Chen with HCW.

This is Eduardo on for Yi. I had a question regarding the 503-A pharmacy. You mentioned that you're licensed in 14 states now. I'm just curious if you have an anticipated time line to reach the 50-state coverage and how much margin impact do you think that will have once you're fully scaled.

Yes. I think -- this is Justin, again. The licensing process is pretty quick for a pharmacy that's already licensed up across the country like we are. So I would expect to be 35 state licensed in the next 60 to 90 days at the latest, could be even sooner. And then the next kind of 15 states will trickle in, I think, let's just say another 30, 60, 90 days from there with 1 or 2 like California being the most difficult. So it's not a long-term thing, let's just say, I think we can be 50-state licensed for compounding, maybe with the exception of 1 or 2 difficult states in the next couple of months.

Got it. And then regarding the...

And your question on the margin, I mean, the reality is it does have -- I mean owning and operating a 503-A compounding pharmacy is a big, big competitive advantage for us. It's extremely difficult to get the COGS to where you need them to be for our type of business, working with a third-party pharmacy. We do have some great third-party compounding pharmacy partners, and they're not going anywhere. But again, being able to bring these things in-house, control the patient experience, really leverage kind of our supply chain capabilities as well, which are really good, especially in pharmacy to drive down COGS. I mean it just makes these things so much more accessible for patients.

Got it. And regarding the oral obesity products that we anticipate coming on to market soon. Do you have any visibility? Is there any market research to indicate what kind of bump -- like what fraction of patients are really holding back because they don't like the needle, right? I'm just trying to get a feel for your impression of how much these orally bioavailable obesity products are going to have on uptake of these therapies.

I think it's big, but I think your guess is as good as mine and probably as good as the drug manufacturers, right? I don't think there's never been an oral medication for weight loss with the type of efficacy profile that Wegovy pill will have that's been approved by FDA. So it's really difficult. I think it's enormous. I mean in my social circles, especially people that are a little bit older, I think it could expand the market by 25% to 50%. I personally know a number of people that I would never think would avoid a very small needle like this or injectable, but that are just waiting for the oral product to come to market. So I think it's going to be very big. I mean to put a number on it, it's very difficult, but there is going to be massive demand is what I think.

Thank you. At this time, we've reached our allotted time for questions. I'll now turn the call back over to Justin Schreiber.

Thank you for your questions and for your interest in LifeMD. And we look forward to speaking with you once again when we report our third quarter results -- or sorry, when we report our fourth quarter results in March of next year. Have a great evening.

Thank you. This brings us to the end of today's meeting. We appreciate your time and participation. You may now disconnect.