The secondary analysis of the primary endpoint was to determine whether a dose response relationship exists using the multiple comparisons and modeling approach described by Bretz et. al. We were extremely pleased to see a clear statistically significant dose response curve at day 180. Among the various dose response curves evaluated, which are statistical modeling techniques, Emax, Linear, Exponential, Quadratic, and Sigmoid Emax all had a p-value of less than 0.05 bonds with the Sigmoid Emax model having the most significant dose-response relationship p equals 0.017. This was one of the primary objectives of the study, and we believe that this may be one of the very first MSCs studies to show a dose response based on review of previously published studies in the public domain. The study's key secondary endpoints were day 180 change in the patient reported outcome questionnaire PROMIS, Physical Function, Short Form 20a, SF-20a, total score and day 180 change in serum levels of tumor necrosis factor alpha, an inflammatory cytokine. The Lomecel-B cohorts did not show a statistically significant difference compared to the placebo cohort in the SF-20a score, and the TNF-α analysis is still pending as of the rest of the biomarkers. The remainder of the efficacy endpoints, which included assessment of physical function, sexual function, fear and risk of falling, depression, cognition, frailty status, pulmonary function, and clinical outcomes, were considered exploratory and Lomecel-B-treated groups did not show significant differences versus placebo at most of the time points for any of these endpoints. Based on the results observed at 270 days, we believe that a larger and/or extended trial would have a greater likelihood of achieving statistical significance and that there is strong evidence to support a continued dose dependence response. Baseline demographics and the trial will balance between the treatment groups and analysis of adverse events, laboratory tests, vital signs, and body weights demonstrated that patients on active Lomecel-B dose groups were generally comparable to the placebo group with respect to safety. There were no serious adverse events reports that were considered related to Lomecel-B infusion. The full body of results of the study will be exceptionally valuable to inform the continued advancement of Lomecel-B for the treatment of Aging Frailty in addition to the other disease indications, which we are investigating as we engage in further discussion with the FDA and other international regulatory bodies. Based on these results, Longeveron is committed and determined to continue pursuing Lomecel-B as a pioneering treatment to ameliorate the detrimental symptoms and address the critical and medical unmet medical need in Aging Frailty. We look forward to presenting the full results of this trial next month at the upcoming 2021 International Conference of Frailty & Sarcopenia Research on September 29th. I thank you for your attention. And at this point, I would like to turn the call over to Geoff Green, CEO of Longeveron for a general business update. Geoff?