Good day, everyone, and welcome to the Lumentum Holdings Fiscal Fourth Quarter and Fiscal Year 2023 Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions] Please also, note today’s event is being recorded for replay purposes. [Operator Instructions] At this time, I would like to turn the conference call over to Kathy Ta, Vice President of Investor Relations. Ms. Ta, please go ahead.

Thank you, and welcome to Lumentum’s fiscal fourth quarter 2023 earnings call. This is Kathy Ta, Lumentum’s Vice President of Investor Relations. Joining me today are Alan Lowe, President and Chief Executive Officer; Wajid Ali, Chief Financial Officer; and Chris Coldren, Senior Vice President and Chief Strategy and Corporate Development Officer. Today’s call will include forward-looking statements, including statements regarding our expectations and beliefs regarding synergies of recent acquisitions, including NeoPhotonics; financial and operating results macroeconomic trends; trends and expectations for our products and technology, our end markets, market opportunities and customers; and our expected financial performance, including our guidance as well as statements regarding our future revenues, financial model and margin targets. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from our current expectations, particularly the risk factors described in our SEC filings. We encourage you to review our most recent filings with the SEC, particularly the risk factors described in the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 1, 2023, and those in the 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 1, 2023, to be filed by Lumentum with the SEC. The forward-looking statements provided during this call are based on Lumentum’s reasonable beliefs and expectations as of today. Lumentum undertakes no obligation to update these statements, except as required by applicable law. Please also note that, unless otherwise stated, all financial results and projections discussed in this call are non-GAAP. Non-GAAP financials are not to be considered as a substitute for or superior to financials prepared in accordance with GAAP. Lumentum’s press release with the fiscal fourth quarter and full year 2023 results and accompanying supplemental slides are available on our website at www.lumentum.com under the Investors section. With that, I’ll turn the call over to Alan.

Thank you, Kathy, and good morning, everyone. We are extremely optimistic about the long-term secular demand drivers in the markets in which we participate and lead. Additionally, our efforts and investments to grow our share in our existing markets and adjacent markets are generating positive traction that will benefit us for years to come. Our focus on technology and product leadership will ensure our growth and differentiation in support of our customers’ needs now and into the future. In the near-term, we are facing significant headwinds as both our direct and end customers actively work to reduce their elevated inventory levels. We believe that the current customer inventory correction cycle will continue through the balance of the calendar year, and therefore, our shipments will be well below end-market demand. Even at these depressed shipment levels, we believe we are continuing to grow our market share outside of the consumer market. We are seeing meaningful demand strengthening for our Datacom chips as hyperscale customers prepare to ramp AI capacity. We believe that our Telecom and Datacom revenue will be up in calendar ‘24 compared to calendar ‘23, as inventory levels should return to more appropriate levels at our customers and their customers. Despite the inventory headwind we experienced in the second half of fiscal ‘23, our full year revenue was up 3% from fiscal ‘22. Also, fourth quarter revenue and EPS were both above the midpoints of our guidance ranges we announced last quarter. Our acquisition integration is going very well. And in fact, we have completed our ERP consolidation and are now running on one company-wide ERP system. We are tracking ahead of our previously announced synergy plans, while we continue to deliver on our new product and technology road maps. At the same time, we continue to focus on…

Thank you, Alan. Net revenue for the fourth quarter was $370.8 million, which was down 3% sequentially and down 12% year-on-year. As Alan mentioned, this revenue level was not unexpected and was driven primarily by the customer inventory digestion we have seen and expect to persist through the end of the calendar year. During the quarter, we had three greater-than-10% customers, all in the telecom market with no 10% customers in the Consumer market. GAAP gross margin for the fourth quarter was 24.2%, GAAP operating loss was 15.1% and GAAP diluted net loss per share was $0.88. Fourth quarter non-GAAP gross margin was 36.7%, which was down sequentially and year-on-year, primarily driven by product mix, factory underutilization and lower revenue. Fourth quarter non-GAAP operating margin was 9.1%, which decreased sequentially and year-on-year. Fourth quarter non-GAAP operating income was $33.7 million, and adjusted EBITDA was $59.4 million. Fourth quarter non-GAAP operating expenses totaled $102.4 million or 27.6% of revenue. Non-GAAP operating expenses were down $2.5 million from Q3 due to tight expense controls. Q4 non-GAAP SG&A expense was $40.7 million. Non-GAAP R&D expense was $61.7 million. Interest and other income was $13.3 million on a non-GAAP basis due to higher interest rates on our cash and investments. Fourth quarter non-GAAP net income was $40.2 million, and non-GAAP diluted net income per share was $0.59. Our fully diluted share count for the fourth quarter was 68.6 million shares on a non-GAAP basis. Our non-GAAP tax rate remains at 14.5%. Turning to the full year results. Fiscal ‘23 net revenue was $1.77 billion, which was up 3.2% from fiscal ‘22. GAAP gross margin for fiscal ‘23 was 32.2%, GAAP operating loss was 6.5% and GAAP diluted net loss per share was $1.93. Full year fiscal ‘23 non-GAAP gross margin was 43.2%, which was…

Thank you, Wajid. [Operator Instructions] Now let’s begin the Q&A session.

Thank you, madam. [Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Meta Marshall from Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead. Again, Meta Marshall from Morgan Stanley. Your line is now live. Please go ahead.

Sorry. Thank you so much. Just having the buttons day. Just in terms of how you guys are evaluating how much of this is inventory correction versus potential for share loss or just not being involved in certain platforms, just how are you kind of evaluating that given kind of repeated kind of step downs and maybe more particularly on the Telecom business, maybe as the first question.

Yes. Thanks, Meta. As we said in the remarks earlier, we believe we’re not losing any share other than in the consumer space, where we’ve been talking about that share normalization and the third competitor. I’d say in Telecom, we’re very confident in our ability to continue to hold share, if not gain share, especially as we introduce new products. So I firmly believe that the slowdown in revenue is really mostly inventory correction and has really nothing to do with share.

Great. I mean just as a follow-up, just how do you examine kind of what – or get a sense of what the inventory positions are? And is kind of the belief that revenue would resume kind of in the revenue growth would resume in the calendar ‘24 period based on when people are telling you that they want to start to get the equipment again? Or is it a matter of that’s when you think that budgets will open up from your customers and they’re expecting. I guess just is that an expectation? Or is that backed by kind of conversations you’re having with customers?

Yes, I wouldn’t say it has to do with releasing the budgets. I think it’s primarily due to the inventory levels on their balance sheets and their desire to lower those, given the availability of components and the availability of us to supply. So I would say that as we look at the next few quarters, Telecom is going to be tough through the balance of the calendar year. And I’d say that we’re seeing some signs of inventory absorption faster than expected at some of the hyperscalers where we expected that to take longer. So I think AI is helping with that, both inside the data center as well as in the data center interconnect space. So I think from that perspective, that’s why we’re confident about calendar ‘24 being higher than calendar ‘23. And those are really in-depth conversations with customer executives and really viewing our inventory in their locations and at their contract manufacturers. And that’s why we believe that the next couple of quarters are going to take to get rid of that inventory.

Great. Thank you. I will pass it on.

Thanks, Meta.

Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of David Vogt from UBS. Please go ahead.

Great. Thank you very much for taking my question. And just two for me. One, Alan, going back to the inventory question, I guess, can you kind of help us understand, you made a comment that you think you’re undershipping to industry demand, where that demand might be today? And how you see that demand sort of progressing as we move through this sort of more challenging period of time in ‘23 into ‘24? That kind of colors your view about recovering back to growth in calendar ‘24. And then maybe a longer-term question, I’ll just give you both at the same time. When you think about mix of the business today, obviously, Consumer and Industrial is a lot smaller than it was last year. And presumably, that’s a relatively strong gross margin business. How should we think about the operating leverage as growth recovers in Telecom and Datacom in calendar ‘24 from a margin perspective? Obviously, it’s unlikely that you’re going to get back to the high 40s gross margin, but I want to get a better sense for maybe gross margin trajectory as we move through the balance of this – the next four quarters into maybe fiscal ‘25. Thank you.

Yes. Thanks, David. I’d say on the under-shipping question, I’d say that clearly, at the revenue levels that we’re having today, our customers are shipping out more than we’re shipping in. And I think that’s really due to the fact that they’ve built up inventory over the last few years when there was fear that components would not be available. So I do believe that, that’s the case. That said, there are some North America carriers that had talked about lowering their CapEx, but not significantly. So I’d say that the demand for bandwidth continues to be robust, and there’s nothing that’s going to slow that down. I would say that, again, on the hyperscaler side, AI is really consuming a lot of the inventory that we had shipped over the last couple of years. And now we’re starting to see signs that things could pick up before the end of the year in the hyperscalers. But in the normal carrier space, I’d say that’s probably premature until calendar ‘24. Wajid, do you want to take the operating leverage question?

Yes, sure. So on operating leverage at the revenue levels we’re currently seeing for the back half of this calendar year, you can appreciate that we’re having a lot of underutilization charges within our internal factories due to the lower revenue levels and our desire to bring down our company inventory to a more normalized level. As the back half of the fiscal year moves on, our expectation is that we’ll really have three things working for us. One is, is that we’re expecting to continue with our synergy plans that we’ve done that we’ve executed on quite well to date on NeoPhotonics. And the consolidation of the factories in the back half of this calendar year should start to show through the P&L in calendar ‘24. The second thing is, is that our Datacom business is a chip business. And so we’re expecting to see improved demand in that part of the business through calendar ‘24 and even actually in the back half of this calendar year as well. And so that should give us some uplift. And then like Alan talked about, once the telecom business becomes more normalized, the underutilization charges should reverse themselves, and we should see improvement. So those are kind of the three tailwinds from this point in time that can help us.

Great. Thanks, Wajid. I will get back in the queue.

Thank you, David.

Your next question comes from the line of Alex Henderson from Needham. Please go ahead.

Great. Wanted to start off with the comment on 3D sensing that the business would be flat into the September quarter. Historically, the June quarter is a seasonally softer quarter versus September and December quarters are seasonally stronger. Can you parse a little bit between, is that a late start because of some production issues? And therefore, we make up a little bit of the 3D sensing in the fourth quarter? Or is it truly as steep a decline as the numbers would indicate? I think if it’s flat sequentially, that’s 60-some-odd percent decline year-over-year. So it’s a pretty steep number.

Hey, Alex, this is Chris. Thanks for the question. Yes, I think a couple of things go into our outlook. I think as we’ve alluded to on prior calls that we anticipated the impact of having an additional competitor in the mix. And so that and current demand environment were both factored into our guidance, and that’s what’s impacting the sequential and year-over-year comps you’re asking about.

Yes. So again, the question is, is there a shift between September and December? Historically, September has actually been a little stronger than the December quarter. Is this a late start to some extent, and therefore, a little bit more in the December quarter? Or should we be using that as the new level of a seasonally strong period?

I would say it’s a little early to guide that product line for that timeframe, but I would think you should think about it being flattish between the two quarters.

Great. And then second question I had for you is, looking at the broader context of the trajectory of demand, I think we started back in the September timeframe saying that we were going into an inventory correction at least in Datacom. Telecom obviously started later than that. But you had initially thought that by the end of the June quarter and into the end of the summer, Datacom would start to recover. Then you pushed it out to the end of the fourth quarter calendar. At this point, it sounds like that’s holding, but it may be a little bit steeper initial decline. Can you talk a little bit about what’s going on relative to the trajectory from the expectations that you gave last quarter to the expectations you gave this quarter on that business and within Telecom as well? Has it steepened as a result of excess cutbacks in shipments at the service providers? What’s the linearity of the demand structure there? Did it fall off towards the end of the quarter?

Well, let me take them one at a time. I would say on the Datacom market, as you have said, in September, we talked about it, getting better in the summer, and we are seeing that in a lot. And I would say that, in fact we are seeing it so much that we probably ratcheted back our capacity more than we should have on Datacom. That’s now in full force to accelerate the output of our Datacom chips. And so I think that’s why we have talked about Q1 being up from last quarter, and then we expect to see sequential growth in our Datacom chip business through the balance of this year as well as into calendar ‘24, so Datacom, I think is on the right trajectory. On Telecom, I would say that our customers are telling us that they want to bring down the inventory to normal levels. And I think the confidence that they have in our ability to produce what they need when they need it, and that the component suppliers, including semiconductors are going to be there when they need it gives them confidence that they can live with even less inventory than originally anticipated. So, I would say nothing really changed there other than inventory levels need to come down further. And that, therefore, we are shipping into our customers less than they are shipping out to the carriers, which in turn should take care of that problem and more normalize as we get into calendar ‘24.

Good. Thank you.

Thanks Alex.

Your next question comes from the line of Samik Chatterjee from JPMorgan. Please go ahead.

Hi. Thank you for taking my questions. I guess from – first one, if I can just ask you to delve a bit more into the AI-related demand that you are seeing? How much of that are you seeing in terms of interest on the VCSEL side versus EML? And when you think about also the customer set there, how much of the engagement is hyperscalers versus other newer sort of companies coming into the ecosystem? Any thoughts in terms of what you expect that demand to look like in a couple of years would be useful, and I have a follow-up. Thank you.

Yes. Let me address that, and I will ask Chris to add on. I would say you are right, it’s beyond the hyperscalers. And so we have collaborated with a lot of the new customers for us that are leading the way in AI and figuring out how do we then customize a product laser, high-power laser or external laser source to satisfy the future needs of AI in a unique way. So, we are doing customization of our products to meet the needs of those unique situations where the data bandwidths are just huge. And so I would say that, that’s really more of an impact in calendar ‘24, but that work has been going on now. And those products will come to market in the calendar ‘24 stage. I would say that what we are seeing today is more EML-based driven 800-gig transceivers that both use our CW high-power lasers for silicon photonics as well as eight EMLs for each transceiver, because those are the products that are available today that can use – that can satisfy that bandwidth needs that the hyperscalers are going through. So, that’s what we are seeing. As far as VCSELs are concerned, we are going through the qualification work on those 100-gig VCSELs I talked about, and we see that really starting in a meaningful way to contribute to our revenue in calendar ‘24.

Yes. And I would also add that in addition to the VCSELs, which are just ramping, and EMLs, we are a market leader. And we also – there are CW lasers that power certain silicon photonic solutions. So, we have really focused, as we have commented on prior call, of broadening our product portfolio in Datacom to be able to address different parts of the data center and different approaches to the same parts of the data center. And we do anticipate significant uptick in the market in Datacom in the coming 12 months relative to kind of the – obviously, the down year that we have at being a chip supplier over the last year. And this is going to be a multiyear phenomenon that we definitely believe that – you are talking tens of percent CAGRs for AI-related deployments over the next few years, so very exciting opportunity for us.

Got it. And for my follow-up, just rotating back to the results and the guide for the fiscal first quarter, I think with 3D sensing in the past, you have obviously had a certain seasonality to the business through a year. Any thoughts of how you are thinking about seasonality this year? Should investors expect, sort of as you get to beyond 1Q, to see sort of sustained sequential growth in the business, or given some of your comments about the sort of calendar year being inventory digestion impacted, it’s really more of a step-up into the second half of the fiscal year? And I think what I am trying to get to is we all understand the earnings power of the business at this run rate is depressed because of the lower demand or the inventory digestion. But in terms of revenue increasing, your OpEx savings coming through, what do you see as the normalized run rate for the business where you want to exit the year?

Well, normalized, it’s hard to say. I would say in the short-term, the next couple of quarters, Telecom is going to be tough. And as we have said, 3D sensing, you can think about being flat. Lasers is going to be down sequentially from Q1 – in Q1, and you can think of that as being flat with fiber lasers going down in Q2, but being offset by our ultrafast lasers. So, I think that then, the real mover between Q1 and Q2 is the Datacom demand, and that’s really going to be gated by our ability to meet that – supply that demand. And so I would say that there is some small uptick in Q2. And then assuming that the inventory is taken care of over the next five months, then we should start seeing some pickup in the first half of calendar ‘24. And then normalized demand is – it happens when we are shipping into our customers exactly what they are shipping out. And I think we are confident we can get back to the levels of revenue we have had in the past. And then with our model, the operating leverage is pretty immense. And we should see significant bounce back when we get up to that $400 million to $450 million, even $500 million in revenue. And I think that’s doable in the not-too-distant future.

Okay. Thank you. Thanks for taking my questions.

Thank you, Samik.

Your next question comes from the line of George Notter from Jefferies. Please go ahead.

Hi guys. Thanks very much. I wanted to ask about the gross margin performance in the quarter, down, gosh, roughly 400 basis points sequentially on a pretty similar revenue number. I guess I am wondering if there is – certainly, the lower 3D sensing is an element of that, I suppose. But I am wondering if there is some excess and obsolete inventory charges there or anything else that drove that big sequential step down? Thanks.

Yes. So, you are right. So, the 3D sensing number did come down into Q4. Excess and obsolescence was pretty normal from a run rate standpoint. It was really under utilization. So, as we have been working through where we really want our inventory to be outside of some of the pre-builds that we are doing as part of our consolidation strategy, we had a pretty hefty impact within our fiscal Q4 with underutilization, that hit both our OpComm and our lasers business pretty significantly. And we are seeing that really flow through into the back half of the calendar year.

Got it. So, is it fair to say that a good portion of the product that you shipped in the June quarter was then manufactured in prior quarters? Is that the way to read that?

Yes. That’s fair. Yes, that’s right.

Okay. And then is there some strategy here to kind of, I don’t know, I guess produce a softer gross margin in the June quarter? Take that underutilization hit all at once then, and then you can kind of clean that effect up going into the September quarter, or is it – is there some other strategy in terms of how you run your utilization?

Yes. I mean really the only way to do it is to produce more, and so – or consolidate facilities. So, we are consolidating facilities, and we will start to see the benefit of that probably in the January timeframe because we will be out of the facilities in the November-December timeframe this year. So, we will start to see the impact of that in our fiscal Q3. So, that will be pretty sizable. And then it’s really production coming back up at all of our facilities to a more normalized level. So, that’s – those are really kind of the only two ways that you can improve that.

Yes. Just to add to that, though I would say that the June quarter Datacom was below on Datacom, and those chips that are produced in our fabs absorb a lot. And as that ramps back up, we should see a better absorption and utilization of the fabs that we have in Japan, making Datacom chips.

Yes. That’s fair.

Got it. Okay. And is that – I was going to say…

Please go ahead.

Is that inventory – thanks Wajid. Let me follow-on here. Is that inventory that you built up from a manufacturing perspective in the March quarter, is that inventory then consumed heading into the September period?

Well, no, not all of it because if you take a look at our inventory turns, it doesn’t turn that fast. So, yes, some of it will flow through into – that already flowed through our fiscal Q4, and then some of it will flow through our Q1. A lot of it is very product level dependent. So, like Alan said, in Sagamihara where our Datacom chips are produced, that inventory is turning very fast. So, as the finished goods are coming out, it’s being shipped. But at our Rose Orchard facility, where we have internal wafer fabrication, that’s moving a little bit more slowly and as well as what we have got in Thailand, that’s built up for lasers as well. So, it is a little bit dependent. And because BOM costs are lower on Datacom chips, the impact at a consolidated level doesn’t show up as well as it does when you take a look at by BU inventory turns.

Got it. Thank you very much.

Thanks George.

Your next question comes from the line of Michael Genovese from Rosenblatt. Please go ahead.

Hi, great. Thanks. I want to dig in on this guidance for Telecom and Datacom to be up for the year, I guess my – in fiscal ‘24. My first question is, is that more of a Datacom comments that Datacom will be way up, or are we seeing that Telecom will also be up as well year-over-year?

Yes, Michael, I think what we said was that calendar ‘24 would be up from calendar ‘23 given that we believe the next two quarters of Telecom shipments are going to be depressed given the inventory reductions that are happening at our customers and at the end customers. So, not fiscal year-over-year, I would say calendar year, we are pretty confident that Telecom will be up in calendar ‘24 from calendar ‘23. That said, again, I would say Datacom is going to grow sequentially each quarter between now and the end of calendar ‘24.

Okay. That makes sense. That’s a calendar comment and thanks for that clarrification. And I guess my other question is, when I look at the Datacom 800G and above AI opportunity, you guys are in EMLs and it looks like they are trying to prioritizing VCSELs as well, I guess my question is, are there any other parts of the Datacom market now with this improvement? I am not [Technical Difficulty]

Sorry, Michael, we couldn’t hear your last question. I think the question though was around are there any other parts other than EMLs and VCSELs that are showing signs of demand growth? Is that your question, or have we lost you?

Yes. I am sorry, here. I hope this is bad.

Mr. Genovese has disconnected. Is it okay to proceed to the next question?

Yes. Maybe we will try to answer the question if we understood it right, and we can talk about different kinds of lasers, CW lasers and such, Chris?

Yes. Certainly, our focus is on serving a hyperscale cloud market, primarily to our transceiver customers that we supply to also certainly supply into the enterprise end markets. So, again, supplying EMLs as the largest product line, and that’s primarily playing now into the transition to 800 gig. And we will also have 200-gig per lane EMLs coming up in calendar ‘24 ramping, and that’s for either a next generation of 800-gig transceivers and then the eventual transition to 1.6 terabits per second. We highlighted the VCSELs ramping so that we have a broader product portfolio as well as CW lasers to intersect the 800-gig and 1.6-terabit silicon photonic based approaches.

Yes. Just the only other thing is we are providing a series of different types of lasers to address the antenna band as well.

Okay. We will take the next question.

Your next question comes from the line of Ananda Baruah from Loop Capital. Please go ahead.

Yes. Good morning guys and thank you for taking the question. Yes. Just a couple if I could as well. I mean I guess just sticking with Datacom chips and lasers. Is it – I guess you have been trying to frame for myself how meaningful this could become as a part of your business. And I think I would just sort of clarify this, correct me if I am wrong. I believe that on the company’s sort of prior rev, let’s say, believe 12 months ago before things really started – before the hyperscales really started to work down their inventory, the run rates at which you were thinking could occur back then, which I think got to the kind of 240, 250, 260 level annually, would sort of suggest if you could still achieve those, if you have more of the tailwinds on the current run rates, you could begin to see sort of 15%, 16% of the company, once achieved, the beyond – and I think those are primary EMLs. Now, you have what’s going on Gen AI related, you are doing some new VCSEL work. And I know a bunch of the CTs down let’s say, but the CW laser were talking about InfiniBand laser work as well. Could we be in a situation in eight quarters where like 20% of the company is Gen AI Datacom chip laser related? And I just have quick follow-up after that. Let me get your thoughts there. Thanks.

Yes. Good question, I think it depends on how fast the other parts of our business grows. But I think your numbers are not too far off. I would say that we have gone down significantly over the last year from a Datacom revenue standpoint, both from the standpoint of unit shipments are way down, and average prices have gone down in this past year, so we are in the midst of growing that. I would say that certainly within the next eight quarters, could we get back to the kind of 240 to 260 annually, yes, absolutely. And I think we are putting capacity in place to do that. We have capacity. As you remember, 3 years ago, we have been continuing to add capacity. We are in the midst of going to larger wafers to address the demand we have seen in the long-term. So, that certainly could be a significant growth driver from where we are today.

Yes, Alan, that’s really helpful. And I guess the quick follow-up is, like longer term, what’s your view on sort of NeoPhotonics ZR technologies’ role in data center for AI related at all? And that’s it for me. Thanks.

Yes. We are very, very happy with the acquisition of NeoPhotonics and the technology and the team that came along with that. I would say that there was a buildup of inventory of ZR and ZR modules at certain hyperscalers. I think that, that is being consumed, and we are starting to see signs of life, frankly, of hyperscalers needing more ZR modules. We are also providing a lot of the components to go into the world’s ZR market. And so from that perspective, we are happy with the whole AI-driven data center demand. But also data center to data center, there is a lot of bandwidth going between them. So, I don’t know, Chris, any other thoughts?

Yes. I mean I think that one of the thesis of the acquisition with regard to ZR was that we would provide a sort of stronger company, if you will, to give customers confidence. And that certainly is bearing out. Unfortunately, as Alan highlighted, that the acquisition closed at about the point where they also realized they had a lot of inventory. So, now that inventory is beginning to clear at hyperscalers, we do expect ZR to be one of the products that recovers earlier in our Telecom portfolio. And then with the level of vertical integration we have, customers are very excited about us as a supplier because they view us as being able to both evolve, obviously, from a cost and volume standpoint given our vertical integration, but also lead the transition to 800-gig and next-generation solutions that follow on beyond the current 400-gig products.

That’s great context. Thanks a lot guys.

Thanks Ananda.

Your next question comes from the line of Tom O’Malley from Barclays. Please go ahead. Tom O’Malley: Hey. Good morning and thanks for taking the question. I just wanted to square just a couple of comments you have made. So, I think that in response to Ananda’s question, you talked about getting back to a greater than $200 million run rate in the Datacom business. But then on – a question about Q2 in the fiscal year in December, you talked about just a moderate sequential increase just given the fact that you don’t have the capacity and you said, hey, maybe in retrospect, we would have not taken down capacity as much. So, just to kind of put those two in perspective, if you look at this coming fiscal year, are you guys going to be able to get back to the levels that you saw in fiscal year ‘23? I think you started the year around $50 million. Is that something you will be able to get to, or is capacity going to hold you back really until the back half of calendar year ‘24, which would be your fiscal year ‘25? Thank you.

Yes. I would say, it’s certainly not a lack of demand that would get us there. So, I would say that in calendar ‘24, there is certainly enough demand. The question is, can we get the capacity back up, given that ASPs are down? So, we have to actually produce a whole lot more chips to get to that $50 million run rate. But that said, the gross margin on those chips are still very, very solid. So, we are anxiously driving the team to grow the output. And you are right, we took down capacity more than we should have. But at the time, it was the right thing to try to drive the underutilization. But I would say that the cycle time on Datacom chips is such that starting wafers today, it doesn’t really impact the next four months, so it is a long cycle time. We are working on that as well. And that’s why we are trying to dampen the expectations of rapid growth in the December quarter for Datacom, but we are expecting to see an uptick in Datacom in the December quarter. Tom O’Malley: Got it. That’s helpful. And then just on the technology side, and this may be just a broader question, but I just wanted to hear your take here, is if you look at the early days of AI here, there is obviously some drivers that are pointing more towards EML. But clearly, there is a lot of drivers that are porting more towards VCSEL and you guys are looking to ramp that product. I guess the question is, if you look at the market for lasers today in AI, how would you split out the percentage of lasers that are being used between VCSEL, CW and EML? And do you think that just given that maybe there are some more VCSELs early on, that you are missing out on some of that opportunity, or if it’s the other way around, just any color would be helpful there. Thank you.

Yes, I would say from the end-market opportunity and unit quantities, the VCSEL arrays and basically short reach and long reach, that’s really what we are talking about, are not that different from a volume standpoint. So therefore, that’s – and being a leader in the EML, so that indicates why that VCSEL is such a good opportunity for us to grow in addition to just market growth to grow share. In terms of CW, CW and EML sort of compete with each other a little bit in that certain silicon photonic architectures are able to do the needed distance or reach that EMLs at the lower end do. So, there is a little bit of cannibalization for zero sum between those two, but that’s why we introduced and have both sets of products. Now that said, EMLs will lead the transition to the 200 gig per lane. And so we expect the EMLs to really be the workhorse of the longer reach AI links.

And just to note that while these units are about the same, the VCSEL costs that are priced are significantly lower than the EMLs.

Yes. So, the market is much larger for the longer reach EMLs.

Thank you, Tom. Tom O’Malley: Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Vivek Arya from BofA Securities. Please go ahead.

Thanks for taking my questions. I was hoping you could help us quantify what percentage of your Q4 sales were related to AI? Were they all in lasers or Telecom, Datacom segment? Just where do the AI-related sales show up? And how large were they in the quarter?

Yes, I think the primary products going to AI would obviously be our Datacom business. We don’t break that out, but it’s sub-10% of company revenue. That said, we don’t know when we ship an EML to a customer, whether that’s going into an enterprise customer or a cloud AI customer at this point. But what we do expect, and as Alan has highlighted, that the growth we are seeing going forward is primarily AI-driven.

So, sub-10% of your Datacom segment is AI or EML related? I just wanted to…

No, I would say a very high percentage of our Datacom revenue is EML-related. It’s just that the Datacom business is a smaller percentage of the overall company revenue given it’s a chip-based business. So, lower ASP, high margin, but lower ASP.

Alright. And for my follow-up, I am just trying to think about the path back to growth, right? It seems for the overall company, it seems like Q2 will probably – could be in the same range as Q1 and Q3 has in the past tended to have seasonal headwinds, but I don’t know whether the mix now is different. So, is it really fair to think that Q4 is the earliest we should be thinking about meaningful sequential growth, or do you think seasonality and mix could play out differently this year?

Yes, I would say seasonality probably doesn’t play as much as it has in the past. And when you look at the March quarter, just given how much less we are shipping into our customers today than they are shipping out. So, I think it all comes down to their inventory levels. And when does that equalization happen, we think that it’s going to take until at least December. But that said, we are going to see some strength in demand for new products. And I talked about the 130-gigabaud, 200-gigabaud type products as well as some new products we have in ROADMs and other, that should drive demand growth in Q1, regardless of inventory situation because they are new products, and they don’t exist in the inventories today. So, I would say it just depends.

Thank you.

Thanks Vivek. Lara, I think we have time for one more question, please.

Thank you, Ma’am. Our last question will come from the line of Jeff Koche from Raymond James. Please go ahead.

Yes. Thanks guys. Jeff with Raymond James in for Simon. So, one of your big competitors put out a forecast for the Datacom transceiver market basically calling for roughly 5 billion increase from 2023 through 2028. I just want to know what your thoughts on that forecast are, do you think that’s reasonable? And I guess your strategy and your milestones that you are targeting for that business would be helpful.

Sure. I think that’s not – I am not familiar with the exact numbers you referenced, but it is not inconsistent with our assumptions around growth in the overall datacom market, particularly driven by AI.

Simon, do you have a follow-up? Go ahead.

Yes. I am just wondering – so if I got this right that the – did you say that NeoPhotonics was up or down sequentially in the quarter? And is it safe to say that the majority of the downtick in September and December is going to be in the legacy Telecom business? And that Neo is going to do – is more, I guess that inventory digestion with the ZR is more played out, is that fair to say?

Yes. Jeff, the delineation between Neo products and legacy products after a year has pretty much gone. So, we are still seeing strength, as we talked about in narrow line with tunable lasers, I think I have said we are seeing growth again in expectations for ZR as we move forward. But I would say that Neo products in the June quarter were down from previous, and we expect as the inventory of whether it’s the narrow line with tunable lasers or other products that we got through the acquisition, as those burn down, we are going to see growth across the board. So, I wouldn’t say it’s anything specific to legacy versus Neo products, it’s an inventory issue at our customers that we are trying to take care of.

Okay. Thanks.

Thanks Jeff.

Thank you. Lara, I think we will turn the call back over to Alan for some closing remarks.

Thanks Kathy. Thank you everyone. I would like to leave everyone with a few thoughts as we wrap up the call. As I have said before, mid to long-term fundamentals are solid for our business as we serve the exponential growth in network bandwidth in the artificial intelligence, machine learning, mobile, carrier and cloud computing markets. New industrial applications are emerging for our imaging and sensing products, and our commercial lasers are expanding into high-growth applications beyond our traditional markets. We are committed to investing deeply in innovation to deliver on our customers’ needs today and in the future. With that, I would like to thank everyone for attending, and we look forward to talking with you again at the investor conferences and upcoming meetings in the coming weeks. Thank you all for attending.

Thank you, sir. Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes your conference call for today. We thank you for participating and ask that you please disconnect your lines. Have a lovely day.