Good day everyone and welcome to the Lumentum Holdings First Quarter Fiscal Year 2025 Earnings Call. All participants will be in a listen-only mode. Please also note today's event is being recorded for replay purposes. [Operator Instructions] At this time, I'd like to turn the conference call over to Kathy Ta, Vice President of Investor Relations. Ms. Ta, please go ahead.

Thank you and welcome to Lumentum's fiscal first quarter 2025 earnings call. This is Kathy Ta, Lumentum's Vice President of Investor Relations. Joining me today are Alan Lowe, President and Chief Executive Officer, Wajid Ali, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, and Chris Coldren, Senior Vice President and Chief Strategy and Corporate Development Officer. Today's call will include forward-looking statements, including statements regarding our strategies, trends, and expectations for our products and technologies, including demand, our customers, our end markets, end market opportunities, our expectations and beliefs regarding recent acquisitions, including Cloud Light, macroeconomic trends and our expected financial and operating performance, including our guidance, as well as statements regarding our future revenues, financial model, and margin targets. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from our current expectations, particularly the risk factors described in our SEC filings. We encourage you to review our most recent filings with the SEC, particularly the risk factors described in our most recent 10-K and in our 10-Q that will be filed soon. The forward-looking statements provided during this call are based on Lumentum's reasonable beliefs and expectations as of today. Lumentum undertakes no obligation to update these statements except as required by applicable law. Please also note that unless otherwise stated, all financial results and projections discussed in this call are non-GAAP. Non-GAAP financials are not to be considered as a substitute for or superior to financials prepared in accordance with GAAP. Lumentum's press release with the fiscal second quarter results and accompanying supplemental slides are available on our website at www.lumentum.com under the Investors section. With that, I'll turn the call over to Alan.

Thank you, Kathy, and good afternoon, everyone. In the first quarter, we exceeded the high end of our guidance for both revenue and earnings per share. We set a new record for Datacom laser chip orders, including 200-gig EML chips, reflecting strong demand from multiple customers, including an AI infrastructure customer. Based on expanding cloud demand and improving trends in the broader networking market, we expect double-digit sequential revenue growth in the second quarter. During the first quarter, we advanced our strategy to expand and diversify our cloud and AI opportunities. We secured an additional hyperscale transceiver customer with a new qualification and initial volume orders. This is beyond the new award we highlighted last quarter. We expect to start shipping volume production against these new customer awards in the first half of calendar 2025, and they will ramp through the year, consistent with the revenue targets we set out previously. Over the past few quarters, I outlined a three-pronged strategy to grow our cloud data center business. As a reminder, the first prong is to expand our cloud and AI customer opportunities at the component and transceiver levels as customers migrate to higher speeds. The second is to scale significant production capacity for components and transceivers outside of China. And the third is to advance our differentiated technology roadmaps, enabling customers to scale future generations of cloud and AI data center architectures to higher compute capacities in a more cost-effective and power-efficient manner. I would like to share more details on recent progress in each of these areas. Regarding the expansion of our customer opportunities, as the industry transitions to higher speeds, our differentiated technology becomes increasingly valuable, especially to market and technology leading customers. For example, in the coming year, the transition to 200G lane speeds will drive…

Thank you, Alan. Before I outline our Q1 financial results, please note that consistent with our discussion last quarter, we have changed our presentation to include certain charges that were previously excluded, primarily related to abnormal excess capacity in our non-GAAP results, starting in the first quarter of fiscal 2025. Comparable historical periods have been recast to align with this presentation for consistency. First quarter revenue of $336.9 million and non-GAAP EPS of $0.18 were above the high end of our guidance ranges. GAAP gross margin for the first quarter was 23.1%, GAAP operating loss was 24.5% and GAAP net loss per share was $1.21. Turning to our non-GAAP results. First quarter non-GAAP gross margin was 32.8%, which was up sequentially and flat year-on-year on higher revenue. In future quarters, we anticipate company gross margins will sequentially increase as manufacturing utilization improves due to an improving telecom outlook as well as an increase in Datacom laser shipments. First quarter non-GAAP operating margin was 3%, which was up sequentially and year-on-year. First quarter non-GAAP operating profit was $10 million and adjusted EBITDA was $37 million. First quarter non-GAAP operating expenses totaled $100.4 million or 29.8% of revenue, a decrease of $1 million from the fourth quarter and down $1.9 million from the year ago quarter. Despite increased investment in our expanding cloud opportunities, Q1 operating expenses were lower due to restructuring actions that were taken during fiscal 2024 as well as overall stringent cost controls across the company. Q1 non-GAAP SG&A expense was $37.7 million. Non-GAAP R&D expense was $62.7 million. Interest and other income was $4.6 million on a non-GAAP basis, driven by interest earned on our cash and investments. First quarter non-GAAP net income was $12.2 million and non-GAAP diluted net income per share was $0.18. Our fully diluted…

Thank you, Wajid. To allow everyone an opportunity to ask questions, please keep to one question and one follow-up. Now, let's begin the Q&A session.

[Operator Instructions] Our first question today comes from Samik Chatterjee with JPMorgan. Your line is now open.

Hi thanks for taking my questions and congrats on the strong guide here. If I can just ask on the guide first. I think the implied increase quarter-over-quarter in cloud and networking is about $50 million, $60 million quarter-over-quarter. Can you sort of parse that out a bit for us in relation to how much of that is telecom improving versus maybe Datacom chips versus datacom modules, if you can directionally sort of point us to where most of that improvement is coming from? And I have a follow-up. Thank you.

Sure. Thanks, Samik. This is Alan. I'd say it's a mix of all of the above. I'd say Datacom chip growth is not a lot until the next couple of quarters because the capacity comes in increments in chunks. And so as I said in the script, the Q4 number will have a step up, but not a lot of chips increase this quarter. The telecom is modest, and I don't expect that, that to be strong growth other than things that are going into DCI applications, but there's a large pick up on the Datacom modules, and we expect that to continue, as we said in the script through calendar 2025.

Got it. Got it. And for my follow-up, you announced another sort of new customer win. Now, you have -- I mean, if I take in aggregate the two new customers you've announced in recent quarters, how should we think about the magnitude of the opportunity maybe after a full ramp with both of them compared to what was the original customer for Cloud Light? How should we think about the magnitude relative to the first original customer there when we take the new two new customers together? Thank you.

Yes, I think that's hard to answer in that it's going to come down to our ability to execute and provide the kind of quality and delivery and capacity that the customers need. So, the new customers, as I said before, will start ramping in the first half of next year, and it will be ours to earn their growth of their business in the second half. And I think we're positioning ourselves very well. We're having the capacity in place, as I said, with clean rooms as well as equipment. So we're planning for success, but we still have to earn that. But that said, these are all very, very large customers that consume a lot of transceivers. And so getting in the door is step one and earning bigger share is really what we're striving to do now.

Okay. Thanks for taking my questions.

Our next question comes from Simon Leopold with Raymond James. Your line is now open.

Thank you very much. I wanted to dig a bit more into what's going on with the Cloud Light business. Reflecting back on when you reported your third fiscal quarter last year, you had talked about sort of the cadence of that business where we'd see a bit of a pause in June and September, which I think we've seen in sort of the snapback in December. And so what I'm trying to get an assessment of is sort of what's changed in that December outlook versus what you thought several quarters ago? Is it above, below? And what's different in terms of informing that expectation on Cloud Light? Thank you.

Thanks, Simon. Yes, nothing has really changed. I think it's coming in as expected. As we've talked about the transition of new products. We're ramping the new products now. And so it's kind of come together as we had expected and as we had talked about on our previous two earnings calls. So nothing unexpected from my perspective.

And then just as a follow-up, I'd like to get your perspective on how you see the market for 1.6 terabit devices evolving and what you would anticipate your role would be in that market, really sort of timing and magnitude perspective? Thank you.

Yes. That one is a tougher one in that lots of interest from lots of customers for 1.6T. And in fact, it's kind of 1.6T is one version of the next generation of products. There's also 800 gig using 200 gig lanes. And so we're going to participate at the component level, as I talked about in the script, with our 200-gig EMLs and that ramps really more towards the summer of next year. But we're in the qualification stages today and have received volume orders today as our capacity is quite constrained. So, we'll play at the component level with EMLs and mostly, and then we'll play at the transceiver level. We've sampled transceivers to customers -- and feedback very, very positive, as we talked about on the last call. So we're in the hunt. We're in the game, and we just need to continue to work on the qualifications. And then the timing is really up to the customers as well. So some are ready sooner than others. But I'd say that by the end of next calendar year, 1.6T should be ramping in a significant way.

Thank you.

Thanks Simon.

Our next question comes from Meta Marshall with Morgan Stanley. Your line is now open.

Thank you. This is Karan Juvekar on for Meta. Just quickly -- and congrats on the quarter. I guess, are there any changes to your time line for vertical integration with Cloud Light? I think you mentioned sort of no shipments until the end of fiscal 2025, but just sort of any updated time line on your vertical integration there?

No real change. I mean we're building products with our lasers and EMLs and [Indiscernible] to be qualified. But I'd say the timing is really unchanged in that products that we were working on before the acquisition are coming to market now, and those mostly didn't change. But I'd say that we have certainly opportunities in calendar 2025 to have more product in feeds, and that should help margins late in the calendar year and into calendar 2026.

Okay, that's helpful. And then a quick follow-up on the telecom side. Are you sort of expecting sequential growth primarily from new products or products that didn't previously had inventory buildup? I think you mentioned that last quarter. I guess how do you expect sort of traditional telecom products to track and sequentially across the year? Thank you.

Sure. I mean I'd say that we're seeing dramatic strength in anything ZR, anything to connect data centers as data centers are being built out, and that can take the form of ZR modules. But given our share of tunable lasers that go into ZRs, that's where we're going to see a dramatic pickup in the telecom side. So, I'd say that the hyperscale growth is very solid outside of the data center, and that includes transport or open line systems. I'd say that carrier spending is still muted and inventory still needs to get burned off there. But there are signs of light. So, new products are flowing out the door, as we talked about. And I think we're a quarter or two away from having returned to more normal inventories, but we're seeing certainly good signs of inventory reductions of our product at our customers.

All right. Thank you.

Thanks Karan.

Our next question comes from Ananda Baruah with Loop Capital. Your line is open.

Hey guys. Good afternoon. Thanks for taking the questions. Would just love to get your thoughts, Alan, on how to think about tariff positioning, tariff risk, hot topic kind of these days. So, just your thoughts there in the context of diversifying out of China? And then I have a quick follow-up as well. Thanks.

Yes, I don't think our strategy is changing based on who is going to be in the White House. We've been on a strategy to be a U.S. headquartered company with manufacturing outside of China. And that is not changing as a result of potentially increased tariffs. So, I would say that it positions us very well as we've had an established manufacturing facility that we're growing dramatically in Thailand. And our laser chips come out of the U.S. as well as the U.K. and Japan. So from that perspective, I think we're as tariff-free as you can get with respect to our future. So, I don't think any strategy change is happening. But I'd say that, that resonates with a lot of our customers who want to have supply chain resilience, and we provide that for them, both with vertical integration as well as a limited footprint in China and a growing footprint outside of China.

That's super helpful context. Thank you. And then just a quick follow-up is just on EML lasers, given this constrained position, is there any, I guess, pricing power that you guys have or that you're using? Thanks and that’s it for me.

I think we look at pricing on a portfolio basis. And I think that as things are constrained, they go down slower or go up faster. And so I think in the constrained environment, as we look forward and as we sit here today, I think we have to pay for a lot of capital that's going in to add capacity. So, I think that we're justified in looking at price optimization on EMLs is one area that we are looking at and have implemented some strategic pricing for those products.

Thanks Ananda.

Thanks guys. Appreciate Alan.

Operator?

We're ready for our next question.

I apologize. My line was muted. Mike Genovese from Rosenblatt. Your line is now open.

Okay. Thanks very much. I guess can I just ask for more color on the telecom market. And when you make comments about 2026 and 2027 and that kind of visibility, is that all on the Datacom side? Or how far does the telecom visibility extend?

I mean I think the telecom -- traditional telecom or carrier telecom, the visibility is not great, although I would say that the deployments have been below the speed of bandwidth demand growth. And so there is going to have to be some additional spending and deployments on new networks. And we're seeing that today in China as they're rolling out new networks. visibility of telecom carrier network spending in 2026 and 2027, I'd be kidding you if I said I had good visibility to that. I think more so the data center and the data center interconnect markets, we believe, is going to be very strong in the future. And frankly, we have a fairly small footprint and small share of datacom transceivers. And with our U.S. headquarter and manufacturing outside of China, I think there's a compelling reason for customers to come our way. So we expect to not only grow our datacom module business and EML chip business, but gain significant share through the next coming years.

Great. That's very helpful. And then finally, I guess, can you give me more color on the optical switch product in the data center? Like what's going to do in the data center? And is this kind of a completely new function? Or is it kind of like the next -- will it replace anything or replace part of anything? And I'm specifically thinking about Ethernet switches, whether there's anything there?

Yes, Mike, this is Chris. Let me take a stab at that. It's performing, obviously, the name, optical switching. And there are, as you know, in a data center, there's a tiering multiple levels of optical switches to get the large scale that's needed, the connectivity across a very large data center. And so the ability to produce high radix, so 300x 300 kind of level switches, I guess you could argue replacing some level of electronic switches, I think of it a little bit more of an NAND in that it enables the data center to scale more efficiently so that the power consumption that's in today's switches or the switches that you would use had you scaled today's architectures, then can be used for more GPUs and more networking, optics, et cetera, to interconnect AI accelerators. So, that's really the idea here is that to bring a lot more energy efficiency when you're talking about big pipes going across a very large data center. The other advantage also to be clear is that as you add layers of switches, the switches do have added latency and optical switching has very little latency. So, that's also a big advantage as you increase the size of data centers. Sorry, Mike, you were saying.

I was just going to say -- so basically sounds like larger cluster sizes of GPU as they get larger and larger, you need larger optical switches basically, to sort of summarize.

In general, yes. I think there can be other uses. And maybe a couple of things to also point out that for us, this is a natural extension. It's leveraging the technologies that we've pioneered in the ROADM space over the past several decades. And so it's really an adapting of technologies that we've had to a new data center opportunity.

Perfect. Thanks so much.

Thanks Mike.

Our next question comes from Tom O'Malley with Barclays. Your line is now open.

Hey guys, nice results and thanks for taking the questions here. So, I wanted to understand the qualification process on the transceiver side. So you've now won another award, and you talked last quarter about kind of qualification in the first quarter time period with that first customer. So can you maybe refresh us here? So, two new customers, are both of them qualified yet? And when they are qualified, when do you normally get a feel for the volume that you're going to get? Obviously, being qualified and the amount that you actually end up shipping is a different thing, but you're very confident to next year. So just can you remind us when are these two customers going to be qualified? And then when will you have a feel for those volume forecasts for those two customers?

Yes. I'd say we're still on track with what we said last time with the first new customer that we talked about on the last earnings call with qualification happening in the first calendar quarter. I would say the new customer that we added this quarter is qualified now, and we received orders now that we'll be beginning to ramp in the first half of next year. So, a little bit different timing, but we're happy with both. And as I said before, we've got a lot of other qualifications going on that we'll talk about on the next earnings call, I hope.

Super helpful. And then just looking at the moving parts to kind of get to that $500 million a quarter, you guys have kind of expressed an increased confidence there, perhaps a little bit above that. So, you're kind of in the low $300 million a quarter right now. You talked about EML setting a record. I think previously, you were about $80 million or so a quarter. So let's just assume a little bit above that. But you kind of talked about capacity being outstripped for 2025, so you're basically sold out there. So when I look at where you go from here, the low $300 million to kind of that $500 million range, is more of that incremental the EML lasers or is more of that incremental the qualifications of the new transceiver customers and they're ramping? Any help there would be really helpful. Thank you.

Sure, Tom. I think starting with our midpoint of our guidance for our fiscal Q2, which is the quarter we just guided, we're guiding to $390 million is the midpoint. And I'd say that there's a combination of what we expect to win and grow between now and the end of next calendar year. As I talked about in the script, growing EML capacity by 40% from the June quarter of last year to the June quarter of this year. this coming fiscal year is part of that growth, but I'd say transceivers are growing. Anything regarding data center interconnect is going to grow. And we're not counting tremendously on a bounce back in the traditional telecom business with carrier spending. And if that happens, then we'll get there sooner. But I'd say that's kind of the three big prongs, which is growth in the chips starting really in the summertime, growth in transceivers that we've talked about, really starting in the December quarter. And then data center interconnect are really the three big drivers for getting us from $390 million as a midpoint to the $500 million.

Thanks Tom.

Our next question comes from Karl Ackerman with BNP. Your line is now open.

Yes. Thank you. I wanted to double-click on the hyperscale win as well as the design win you spoke about last quarter. Specifically, are these transceiver opportunities being driven by hyperscalers or large customers connecting their own AI processors? Or is it being driven by you being included on reference designs of maybe perhaps new GPU platforms? And as you address that question, are these initial transceivers now integrating your EMLs? If not, does that push out the ramp of these customers or hyperscalers ramping your optical products in 2025? Thank you.

Yes. Thanks, Karl. I think we don't want to necessarily get into customer architectures and what they're deploying. But we can certainly comment on our transceivers. And so these, in general, are transceivers that won't have our EMLs at initial launch, if you will, because these have been in development and designed over the past year or so. Obviously, these accounts have other opportunities to Alan's point, as we succeed and execute with them, not only will there be more share, but there will be more SKUs and other types of transceivers where we can introduce more of our own content.

Okay. Thank you.

Hey Karl, did you have a follow-up?

Yes. I guess perhaps along the same lines then, could you discuss whether the new wins that you're receiving are driven by data center customers reallocating procurement of these optical transceivers to U.S. domiciled suppliers like yourself? Can you just comment on that? And then perhaps in addition to that, are you able to quantify maybe the expanding TAM that you see as these AI clusters now have the option of being -- of disaggregating some of the components of scale-up architectures? Are you also seeing that as a new opportunity? Thanks.

So, maybe add that these are new opportunities. So they're -- so it's not a reallocation. I would say that customers are certainly like the fact that we are U.S. headquartered and non-China manufacturing and a long road map of that. So I think that makes us more competitive in winning in these new opportunities. These are definitely scale out for the time being. The introducing of optics into more of a scale-up is probably a year or year and a half out kind of time frame. I mean there are certainly people making progress towards that. But these are traditional pluggable transceivers for scale-out hyperscale opportunities as people deploy a lot more AI gear, if you will, if you recall that if you turn the clock back a year ago, there were really only two folks building AI gear. And I think you'll have more -- I think you brought up the word to an extent, some level of disaggregated architectures as we roll forward into calendar 2025 and 2026.

Thanks Karl.

Our next question comes from David Vogt with UBS. Your line is now open.

Hey guys. Thanks for taking the question. This is Brian on for David. Can you clarify if these transceiver customers were contemplated in your 4Q 2025 guide? And then I have a follow-up.

Yes, we talked about calendar 2025 and getting to $500 million. I think we have plenty of opportunities, whether this one or that one was in our number. We don't need to win all the ones we're going after. So it's hard for me to say that, yes, we're right on track with these two that we had planned on. So, I'd say that's a hard one to answer. They certainly play a part in getting us there. And we're really, really happy with the progress we've made with these customers as well as other customers that we expect to be talking about on future calls.

Got it. That's helpful. And then for my follow-up, -- in the qualification process, you mentioned that you have to earn more volume. Does that mean you're a secondary provider in these deals? And then if so, what type of share would be reasonable in your view?

Well, I'd say that in any of our businesses, we have to earn trust and earn share, and that's done through quality execution and resilient supply chain and doing what we say we're going to do. And share does shift in all of our business as a result of performing well or not performing well. And so that's what I intended to mean by that discussion. I'd say that there are hyperscaler demand is very big and no one relies on one supplier. So, as they ramp up two or three suppliers, the ones that perform better are going to get more share in the long run. So that's what we're really working on to make sure that we gain that trust and we gain that resilience of supply so that customers can count on us to provide more of their product that they need, and that's what we're working on.

Thanks for the color.

Thanks Brian.

Our next question comes from Ryan Koontz with Needham & Co. Your line is now open.

Great. Thanks for the question. I wanted to circle back to your comments around DCI and understand your exposure there on tunables. But can you maybe talk about what your opportunity is in the module space there? Are you present? Do you have any design wins in ZR today for ZR modules? And how should investors think about that opportunity for the company?

Yes. So, DCI exposure, I would say the biggest revenue exposure for us is what I said before, which is the tunable lasers and to a lesser degree, other components that go into other people's ZR and ZR+ modules. We do have exposure to our own ZR module, and we're making very good progress on the 800-gig ZR and ZR+, both domestically as well as outside of the U.S. So we're favorably encouraged by the progress there. I'd say the 400-gig module, frankly, we were late to market. We have a small share, and we're doing our best to try to gain share there. But frankly, the market is very, very strong, and we're very happy in growing our tunable laser business there and supporting our customers who are winning significant share in a market that's growing very rapidly as data centers are moving further apart.

Yes. That makes sense. It's more of a mature market there. And then a quick question for Wajid around gross margins and kind of in lieu of kind of a lot of puts and takes going on here. How should we think about gross margins as the fiscal year unfolds here?

Yes. Thanks, Ryan. So like we talked about in the script, we're expecting gross margins to improve sequentially. We're even seeing it in Q2. You can see that our operating margin profile is significantly different than what we -- how we performed in Q1. And so we're expecting to see that gross margin improvement move into Q3 and into Q4 as well as more of our supply comes online for EMLs. Having said that, we are expecting to increase our R&D spend in Q2 and into Q3 and Q4. You can probably tell from Alan's comments that customer pull is quite strong and the opportunities are quite strong as well. And so because of that, we're probably going to be spending ahead of revenue from an R&D standpoint. And we've already talked about some of the capacity investments we're making. So yes, we'll see gross margins tick up sequentially through the fiscal year, but we'll -- it will be muted a little bit from an operating margin standpoint because of the increased R&D investment we're making just given the amount of customer pull we have.

That's great. And just that capacity, you just talked about adding that capacity talk about? And does that have an overhead impact, also a little headwind there until it's fully--

Yes, it does. Yes. Thank you. No, it does have a little bit of overhead impact because we're building out in our Thailand facility as we move more of our production of transceivers to Thailand. And so as we move that up and ramp that up, there will be a couple of quarters of overhead expenses associated with that. And so that's already contemplated in the sequential increases in margins. But then as that volume ramps up in the middle part of next calendar year, we'll be able to see the benefit of that moving through the quarter. So we'll explain more about that as the quarters happen, but thank you for asking about that.

Sure. Thanks a lot guys.

Thanks Ryan.

Our next question comes from Christopher Rolland with SIG. Your line is now open.

Hey guys. Thanks for the question. So Alan, I wanted to double-click on your prior answer around vertical integration into lasers in particular, into Cloud Light. You said it mostly didn't change. I wanted to know what actually did change there. And then you suggested the second half of 2025 for those margin benefits. So, I would assume that's a timetable for integration. And perhaps I may have been wrong here in my assumption, but my assumption is that you would be more meaningfully integrating in the first half. So I'd love to know, is this a qualification issue? Is this not a delay? Was this just my understanding that's wrong? Is this EML constraints? What exact -- is that timetable pushing out indeed a bit for vertical integration? And what's causing it?

Yes. So, good question, Christopher. I'd say a couple of things, one of which is customers don't want us to change product that's already in flight. That's number one. Number two, our laser capacity is constrained. So we have to make, make versus buy decisions around what mostly the product going through the transceiver business today is silicon photonics based. So, we use a lot of CW lasers, not EML lasers yet in the products that we're shipping and released today. So we can buy those CW lasers externally or we can use our very critical EML capacity to add those CW lasers into our products. We've done the math. There's a lot of good CW laser suppliers. It makes more sense for us to buy those CW lasers and free up that EML capacity to ship to our customers than it would be to convert that EML capacity to CW lasers, for example. So that's one of the things that's pushing off that integration of CW lasers into our products until the second half. I'd say that we are working on EML-based designs, and those will come to market in the second half of the calendar year. We have to get qualified and go through that. But today, most of the products that we're producing are silicon photonic-based using CW lasers from our strategic supplier partners to keep that EML capacity for our customers.

Yes. And I'd add that the real performance advantage of EML starts to come in as we talk about 1.6T and future generations of higher performance 1.6T. So, our natural road map also aligns with using more vertical integration where the technologies are much more differentiated at those speeds.

Thank you very much guys. That actually cleans up a lot for me, clears up a lot at least. It also probably brings me to my second question, which is trying to understand more about EMLs. I mean it just seems like the whole market is moving here. AI demand is inflecting units. There's one other big EML player as far as I recognized at least. It seems like if you have this EML capacity available, it actually has pull into your transceiver units pipeline, market share, customers, new customers, et cetera. So, why are we talking about 40%? Like why aren't we talking about like 100% or even more here? Why is 40% the right number here? And like how capital intensive is this? If you wanted to, like how fast could you get new lines up? And would you be leaning on overbuilding versus underbuilding just given what seems like the importance of this part into this new cycle? Thanks.

Christopher, you sound a lot like my Board of Directors. So, that's a very good question. It does take time to add capacity. One of the things that we did as we were working on integrating and getting synergies, we had two wafer fabs in Japan. We were going to close one of them, consolidate it. We stopped that several quarters ago and said we need that extra wafer fab capacity, and we're ramping that up now. If you go back year and a half ago, we had idle capacity in our wafer fab. It takes year and a half years to add capacity. So, that's kind of what's going on. We are adding more. We're converting to larger wafer sizes. That takes time, and we're adding epi reactors that takes time as well. So a very good question. If I had the ability to add 100% between now and June, I would do it. But that's the lead time with capital equipment and bringing up and qualifying new tools is just painful. But the good news is there's barriers to entry in that market. And so we're going to grow it as fast as we possibly can. And at the same time, we're going to introduce new products. And so that 200 gig per lane is new product we're getting qualified. That takes time and resources and starts typically at a lower yield, and we have to get through that learning curve and that yield. And so I think we're going to do well in the second half of the calendar year on that. But we are adding capacity beyond the 40% for sure after the June quarter. We're not sitting idle for sure.

Perhaps just one more follow-up. Why don't you use your -- okay. thanks guys. I was just going to say, why don't you use your limited -- why don't you use your limited EML capacity to bring new cloud-like customers online? It seems like that would be two birds stone?

Yes, that's a good question. I think we have silicon photonics. We have multimode VCSEL-based transceivers and we have EML-based transceivers. We are designing each of those for a given application. Some applications work better with single-mode silicon photonics. Some have a better cost structure with EMLs. And as Chris said, a lot of the new next generation of 1.6T likes EMLs better, especially as you get into multi-wavelengths where EMLs can really play a key role there. So yes, we're absolutely going to do that. It probably makes more sense in the second half of the calendar year as we get into these more advanced 1.6T products. And then we have next-generation 200-gig EMLs, which are really going to differentiate us from our competitors. And I think that really gives us the ability to drive incremental differentiation at the transceiver level and drive higher gross margins.

Thanks guy. Sorry for the third question.

Thanks Chris. I think we'll squeeze in one more question.

Understood. Our final question today comes from Richard Shannon with Craig-Hallum. Your line is now open.

Hi. Glad to get in under the wire here. Thanks for taking my questions guys. I'll follow-up on the topic of the optical circuit switching here is a couple of earlier questions and comments. Maybe you can just kind of delineate the timeframe for qualification and volume ramps here just to get a sense there? And then also your close peer who reported recently has obviously talked about a product in this area. Maybe you can discuss how you're differentiated or different or complementary to what they're doing.

Yes. I can tell you about what we're doing. I can't really comment on what they're doing. I'm sure their technology is unique and interesting. I think our technology and our approach is different. Ours is MEMS-based, and we have, as Chris mentioned earlier, years of experience with MEMS designs and MEMS in our WSSs. In fact, our most advanced WSSs have multiple technologies like LCOS and MEMS. So we are getting positive feedback, as we said, from our customers. There are customers that are more advanced and more ready to put optical circuit switches into their data centers. And then there's customers that need to rearchitect or write software to enable this optical circuit switching. And so it's really dependent upon which customers are ready when. But I would say that a deployment in calendar 2025 is realistic. And really, the more meaningful growth will probably be in calendar 2026.

Okay. That's great detail. Thanks for that Alan. My second question--

I was just going to add one thing, Richard. We've already transferred the product to our Thailand operations. So we're making qualification units and beta units in Thailand today. And so we'll be ready when the customers say go.

Okay, great. Thanks for that Alan. My second question is on a topic that hasn't been asked in a while, and that's 3D sensing. Is there anything going on here either in your kind of past markets or new markets here that's going to give us any signs of growth and improvement anytime soon?

Hey Richard, this is Chris. I would say a little bit of yes and a little bit of no. I would say that, obviously, the high-volume applications that we have been playing into for several years is mature, and there's not an obvious catalyst in that specific application other than if the Android world begins to adopt in mass. No suggestion that they will in the short term or midterm, but that's always a possibility. I would say as we look to other opportunities in sort of metaverse, augmented virtual reality and applications like that are helping a bit as well as the automotive space, but both of those have been a little slower to adopt than we've all hoped. But there are folks continuing to invest strongly in that. And as a leader in the technology, we continue to partner with those leaders, but we'll keep things muted in terms of thoughts on that until that new application really comes along.

Great. Thank you guys.

Thanks Richard. Thank you. Sienna, I think we'll pass the call back over to Alan for some concluding remarks.

Great. Thank you. I'd like to leave everyone with a few thoughts as we wrap-up the call. We are excited about our growth prospects. Our comprehensive photonics portfolio built on differentiated in-house technology and proven manufacturing capabilities addresses critical challenges like connectivity bottlenecks and power consumption. With strong progress on these -- on our three-pronged strategy, we are highly confident that we will reach $500 million in quarterly revenue by the end of calendar 2025 and in the long-term, expand our cloud business to a multibillion-dollar annual run rate. Thank you for joining our call today. We look forward to seeing you again at investor conferences and upcoming meetings this quarter. Have a great day.

That will conclude our conference call today. Thank you all for your participation. You may now disconnect your line.