Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the fourth quarter 2010 LeMaitre Vascular Incorporated earnings conference call. (Operator Instructions) I would now like to the turn conference over to your host for today, Mr. J.J. Pellegrino, Chief Financial Officer.

Good afternoon and thank you for joining us for our Q4, 2010 conference call. Joining me on today's call is our Chairman and CEO, George LeMaitre; and our President, Dave Roberts. Before we begin, I would like to read our Safe Harbor statement. Today, we will discuss some forward-looking statements, the accuracy of which is subject to risks and uncertainties. Wherever possible we will try to identity those forward-looking statements by using words such as belief, expect, anticipate, forecast and similar expressions. Please note these words are not the exclusive means for identifying such statements. Please refer to the cautionary statement regarding forward-looking information and the information under the caption Risk Factors in our 2009 10-K and subsequent SEC filings including disclosure of the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied. During this call, we may discuss non-GAAP financial measures. Please refer to our earnings release on our website www.lemaitre.com for a discussion and reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures. I will now turn the call over to George LeMaitre.

Thanks, J.J. I'd like to focus my remarks on the three headlines in the quarter. Number one, we pushed record sales of $14.4 million, 9% ahead of Q4 2009. Number two, we initiating a quarterly dividend. Number three, we acquired the LifeSpan product line and we bought out two European distributors. As for our first headline, we posted record sales of $14.4 million in Q4 2010, up 9% organically over Q4 of 2009. The Americas was up 14%, while international grew 2%. For the full year, sales increased 12% organically to $56.1 million led by the Americas, which was up 18% and our vascular category, which was up 17%. The increase from 61 to 67 sales reps during 2010 was a key sales driver in both Q4 and the full year. The tier-A sales rep model allows us to produce sales growth, while keeping sales rep W2s reasonable. We installed this new rep model in November 2008 and it now comprises over 70% of our North American sales force. Also, our tight focus on vascular niches is working well. We established a beachhead with our differentiated valvulotomes and shunts, and then we follow-up by selling the full line. At last quarter's call, we announced our intention to scale back our TAArget/UniFit stent program. This allows us to refocus our sales reps efforts on our core vascular products, where growth has been considerably better. Organically, vascular sales grew 17% in 2010, whereas endovascular was up just 1%. Also vascular accounted for 71% of 2010 sales versus 67% in 2009. As we defocused on these TAAget/UniFit stent grafts, our faster growing vascular category will begin to dictate the company's growth rate. We also began to reduce our stent graft clinical trial spending, as we have suspended our two American trials. Let me…

Thanks, George. In Q4 2010, we continue to execute on two of our counter-strategies, bolt-on acquisitions and distributor buyouts. In November we acquired LifeSpan, a vascular graft made of ePTFE, the most popular material for small vessel grafts. 80% of peripheral grafts and 95% of dialysis access grafts are made from ePTFE. We are pleased to add this open vascular product to our main sales bag. LifeSpan is approved in all major markets, the U.S., Europe, Japan and Canada. The $4 million acquisition, of the two part transaction in which we acquired the Laguna Hills, California factory from Angiotech for $2.8 million, and customer list and other assets from the former LifeSpan distributor, Edwards LifeSciences for $1.2 million. We began selling LifeSpan in the U.S. and Europe in Q4, and we'll start selling in Japan next month. We expect LifeSpan sales of $1.7 million in 2011 and grow thereafter. On the bottomline, we expect LifeSpan to dilute operating income by $700,000 in 2011 and be accretive thereafter. Turning to distributor buyouts. In Q4, we also signed agreements with our dealers in Spain and Denmark allowing us to go direct-to-hospital in Q3, 2011. These buyouts represent the continuation of our success for Go-Direct strategy, we view is to expand our international footprint. With the Spanish agreement signed, we'll soon redirect in all major European countries. Before turning the call over to J.J, I'd like to give you a strategic update on our TAArget and UniFit stent grafts. On our October call, we announced our decision to reduce our R&D spends on these products, in order to deploy assets into a higher growth vascular business. Since then we've decided these product lines may have greater potential in someone else's hand. Accordingly, we recently initiated a possible divestiture process. If the sale were to happen, our European endovascular specialists would focus their attention on selling Endologix, which we have contract to distribute in most of Western Europe through 2013. We are pleased to see these products grow 16% organically in 2010. With that, I'll turn it over to J.J.

Thanks, Dave. I would like to say a few words about our sales trends, effects of the Dacron graft manufacturing transition, cash balances and 2011 guidance. Versus 2009, full year 2010 sales increased 10% on a reported basis and 12% organically. Drivers included a 17% improvement in our vascular category and an 18% increase in the Americas. Indeed the company sales have become more vascular and more North American. As a percent of 2010 total sales vascular represented 71%, up from 67% in 2009, while the Americas represented 62%, up from 58% in 2009. Over the coming quarters, we expect that our vascular category will continue to outpace endovascular. There are two main reasons for this. First, our European sales force should gain more traction as it focuses on TAArget and UniFit. And second, our North American team, which is not TAA stent grafts, should continue to build on their strong results. I'd like to focus on one important project that we are currently executing, the relocation of our Brindisi, Italy, manufacturing facility. We terminated 29 employees on December 31, 2010 and will likely replace them with 13 employees in our Burlington facility. We will experience charges related to this closure over the next few quarters. However, beginning in the back half of 2011, this consolidation should add more than $1 million per year to our operating profit. Sales of the Dacron graft product line increased 30% in 2010. In total, the Brindisi move reduced operating income by approximately $2 million in Q4, 2010, of which approximately $400,000 was in cost of goods sold and $1.6 million was in restructuring charge. As delineated in our guidance, we estimate that there will be a $1.2 million charge in Q1, 2011 primarily related to Brindisi. Turning to the balance sheet, the Company's…

(Operator Instructions) Your first question today comes from the line of Joshua Zable with WJB Capital.

Couple of questions; just maybe first I guess for JJ, but everyone, just kind of try to walk us through the guidance here. You guys changed it to $62 million, but now with the defocus on EndoFit Program, you obviously have stuff going on with distributors, I'm just trying to, maybe you can walk us through, because the optics, it looks like it's coming down, but it sounds like organically, things are going very well. So can you walk us through sort of how we get the $62.7 to $62?

Yes, we are still up 11% on that guidance, which we think is nice growth. There is a couple of things going on behind the $62.7 to $62, one is the TAArget and UniFit transition that we have been talking about for a while now. Those sales we think will not be as robust as they have been in the past and that certainly affects our guidance in this year. And in addition, the Spain and Denmark agreements allow for some repurchase of inventory, which will give us some revenue recognition issues in the quarter. And so those two things combined, I think into Q2 as well will sort of lead us to bring down the full year guidance. Again it's still 11% reported, and underneath that, I think it's important to note that Open Vascular is still very strong. It was up 18% in 2010 and we still think it's going to post some pretty strong results in 2011.

Just to be clear, it's definitely sort of one-time things. Nothing's changing there; you are not seeing any fundamental changes to the business?

Right, and in fact you are replacing what we think is slower growing sales with faster growing sales. So to the extent that we get our sales force focused out of TAArget and UniFit and into our open vascular products, we think we will increase the growth rate over time.

And then just sticking with the guidance, you left operating income the same; obviously we are taking revenues down slightly. Just kind of wondering, should I read in too that things are kind of progressing more profitable than you thought? Is that a function of, hey, with the distributors who lose some sales, we'll use some profitability. Just help me understand, because obviously the operating margin is the same on lower sales, so something must be going right.

Yes, I think underneath that sales number, you can expect our gross margin to improve over the course of the year. We certainly got these biomed transition issues that we are going through, just recently in Q4 and then in Q1 that we have talking about and we have guided for. If we get improvements there over the course of the year, you'll certainly behoove the bottomline. And then in addition, I think we've had a history of keeping operating expenses pretty tight, and I think we will continue to do that into the year. And between those two things, I think despite the sales countdown a little bit, we've kept operating income the same.

And then just on the overall market, you guys said, obviously effectively maintaining the growth guidance ex those items, can you just kind of tell us what you're seeing out there in the market, maybe George and Dave in terms of growth wise, are things getting better, are things getting worse, are things staying the same? I mean, you guys are obviously growing pretty nicely, especially relative to a lot of other companies. I'm just wondering, is it share gains, are we seeing procedures pick up, just any color around general market would be helpful.

I do know some other companies that are talking about this, but we didn't see anything last year. I would say, our issues seemed to be internal issues around the TAArget and UniFit stent graft. But we have a nice experiment, which is, in the United States, we are a strictly Open Vascular company without stent graft, and we grew 18% last year in the U.S. And if you take out 4% or 5% of pricing in the U.S., the balance of that 18% for the year winds up being unit growth and/or share gains. So we're not really seeing too much from our perspective, particularly in the markets where we are not having to work through this TAArget/UniFit transition.

And then one housekeeping item; just on the share repurchase, how much is left? You guys have been handy.

About $2 million, Josh, through the end of the year.

Your next question comes from the line of Joe Munda with Sidoti & Company. Joe Munda - Sidoti & Company: Just real quick, on the restructuring charges with the Brindisi facility, JJ, I know you had mentioned $1.2 million in Q1, 2011 expected. Is that going to be total for the year? Can you give is some outlook as to what we can expect as far as structuring charges go?

I think that's about half of what maybe we get during the year. We're thinking that about $1.2 million is non-cash related to the takedown of the balance sheet at the Italian subsidiary basically as we shut that thing down from an entity standpoint. And then, as we're getting out of TAArget and UniFit, over time we think maybe we'll experience some restructuring or impairment items there as the year goes on.

Just for clarification, that $6 million in guidance of op income, that is the op income after all the charges. That's what we're saying the reported op income will be for 2011. Joe Munda - Sidoti & Company: Also, just one other question; as far as the dividend is concerned, how did that come about? I mean you guys never paid a dividend in the past. Is it because you guys are kind of slowing on the acquisition front that you feel that you need to repay investors? I mean where is that coming from?

No, we feel real good about our acquisition pipeline. We just feel like we have a lot of cash. We have $22 million, $23 million of cash in the bank. We think it's going to go up by about $7 million or $8 million this year, and we figured why not pay out $1 million worth of that in dividends. It feels to me like just another flavor of the repurchase program. If you remember, we started that thing in August of '09 when the stocks were $3, and the point of that was to sort of enhance shareholder value. This seems to me like just another flavor of trying to enhance shareholder value.

Your next question comes from the line of Larry Haimovitch with HMTC.

J.J., on the cash side, you've had a terrific round of generating positive cash flow. This quarter was an exception. I'm assuming with your operating income at $10 million that we would certainly expect positive cash flow for '11. I don't think I heard in prepared remarks you quantifying cash flow. Would you care to comment on that at all?

We've actually got $6 million of operating income, and that contemplates all the charges that we just talked about earlier. And we've got non-cash items of about $2.5 million in depreciation, amortization and stock-based comp. And then if you take out some CapEx, maybe around $8 million, $8.5 million of sort of normalized free cash flow for 2011 based on the guidance. Now we're going to invest in a bunch of stuff along the way as well, but that's sort of your normalized theoretical number. And looking back to 2010, if you did the same thing, you are sort of in the $7 million range. So a nice progression there despite the investments going on.

Yes. And then of course you have the buyback which could potentially reduce the cash flow?

That's $2 million right there. $1.3 million for dividends. So there is a big trough right there.

George, on the regulatory side, I don't think there were any comments on the call or maybe I missed it on the UnBalloon. I know it's been a little sluggish, getting through the FDA. Any update on that product where you have stuff in the FDA regulatory pipeline you want to update us with?

It's interesting, Larry, things have been going so well for us from a regulatory and clinical perspective. We've been getting so many approvals that we literally forgot to brag to you guys about them this time. So we got five or seven regulatory approvals in Q4 and into the first month of Q1, and I forgot which one was that exactly, but we had a great run there. The switch we've made internally has really broadened out what we're getting in terms of regulatory approval. And I would say on the UnBalloon, to follow up on that, it isn't a source, because we remain very excited about this thing when we get it out there. The filings will be taking place Q1, Q2, and our current guesstimate is we'll have that thing on the market in 2011. So it should be exciting when we get it out there and obviously we'll be pushing towards that as quickly as possible.

George, in 510(k), I don't think they were requiring any specific clinicals, were they?

That's correct.

Basically, that was your decision to reengineer the product and then send it back for FDA approval. Is that essentially what happened?

That's right. So we pulled it off the market in June of last year for safely reasons. It wasn't re-sheathing well and we were nervous about that. Nothing bad happened, but we were nervous about it. We pulled it off the market for that. In tandem, we'd always had UnBalloon 2.0 coming along down the track with four or five very nice convenience items in addition to safety changes that we made in the rework. And so when it comes out, it will be UnBalloon 2.0 for all us internal people, although the world will notice UnBalloon.

Your next question comes from the line of Bill Wolfenden with Cottonwood Investments.

We have been always talking since the IPO you guys have mid-70s gross margins and you've got it to operating margins of 10% for '11. Can you just give us some sort of framework of what the revenue run rate level would be for us to get up close to the 20% operating margin level?

I can't say if you take out the charges in 2011. You can think of this as a 13% operating margin company. And I would say beyond that, if you'd be asking to give guidance into the years that follow, I don't feel comfortable doing that.

But is it realistic that we see 20% operating margins at some point for this business?

Yes.

The share count, with the buyback in 2011, do you anticipate that that stays roughly flattish again?

Yes, 16.1 fully diluted.

Gentlemen, this concludes the question-and-answer portion of today's call. I'd like to turn the call back over to George LeMaitre, Chief Executive Officer, for closing remarks.

Thank you much, Regina. I just wanted to remind everyone we have a couple of conferences coming up before I let you guys go. We'll be at Cowen in Boston in March. We'll be at Roth in Southern California in March. And we'll also be speaking at JMP in San Francisco in May. And there is a couple of more after that, but I'll just leave it at that. A special thanks to everyone who listened in today. Thank you very much. I'll pass it back it over to Regina again.

Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes our conference for today. Thank you so much for your participation. You may now disconnect. Have a wonderful day.