Good afternoon. My name is Erica and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I'd like to welcome everyone to the Third Quarter Lattice Semiconductor Earnings Conference Call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speakers' remarks there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Thank you. Mr. David Pasquale of Global IR Partners, you may begin your conference.

Thank you, operator. Welcome everyone to Lattice Semiconductor's third quarter 2017 Results Conference Call. Joining us today from the company are Mr. Darin Billerbeck, Lattice's President and CEO, and Mr. Max Downing, Lattice's Chief Financial Officer. Both executives will be available for Q&A after the prepared comments. If you have not yet received a copy of today's results released, please e-mail Global IR Partners using LSCC@globalirpartners.com, where you can get a copy of the release off of the Investor Relations section of Lattice Semiconductors Web site. Please note we have also published a PowerPoint presentation on the IR site to accompany today's call. Before we begin the formal remarks, I'll review the Safe Harbor statement. It is our intention that this call will comply with the requirements of SEC Regulation FD. This call includes and constitutes the Company's official guidance for the fiscal fourth quarter 2017. If at any time after this call, we communicate any material changes to this guidance, we intend that such updates will be done using a public forum such as a press release or publicly announced conference call. The matters that we discuss today other than historical information include forward-looking statements relating to our future financial performance and other performance expectations. Investors are cautioned that forward-looking statements are neither promises nor guarantees. They involve risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. Some of those risks and uncertainties are detailed in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, and our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. The Company disclaims any obligation to publicly update or revise any such forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that occur after this call. Our prepared remarks will also be presented within the requirements of SEC Regulation G regarding Generally Accepted Accounting Principles or GAAP. Some financial information presented by us during the call will be provided on both a GAAP and a non-GAAP basis. By disclosing certain non-GAAP information, management intends to provide investors with additional information to permit further analysis of the Company's performance for results and underlying trends. Management uses non-GAAP measures to better asses our operating performance and to establish operational goals. Non-GAAP information should not be viewed by investors as a substitute for data prepared in accordance with GAAP. If we use any non-GAAP financial measures during the call, you will find the required presentation of and reconciliation to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure is in the Company's earnings press release. At this time, I would now like to turn the call over to Mr. Darin Billerbeck. Please go ahead, sir.

Thanks, David, and thanks to everyone for joining us on the call today. We saw many of you last month at our Analyst and Investor Day in New York City. It was an excellent opportunity for us and the management team to outline the main investment themes that we had along with our execution strategy and finally add more color on our current financial plan. We ended up at capacity with another 150 or so on the live webcast for that event, and we were pretty encouraged by the high level of interest and the post event feedbacks, so thanks again for everyone who participated either in person or online. So after reviewing the Q3 highlights, I will review some of the key Analyst Day points once again. So, for the third quarter, product revenues increased in our three core markets compared to the prior second quarter. Consumer was up led by higher demand from smart devices and gains at Samsung Mobile. Consumer is an area that continues to be a growth driver for us. This growth more than offset revenue declines from DTV and anticipated declines from a top North America handset consumer OEM which we don't name. Clearly, these product declines and the continued delays in the next generation of HDMI were difficult on us, but we moved on and we are focusing on business that are actually performing. Comps and Computing was up with some positive moment from our top Chinese customers and the imminent ramp of the Intel Purely server platform reference design. And finally, industrial was also up driven by continued momentum from our broader market growth including things like Amazon [ph] robotics win. Underpinning our third quarter product revenue was our FPGA revenue which was actually up over 9% compared to Q2. Our iCE…

Thank you, Darin. As part of our press release today, we have provided detailed reconciliations of our GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures. For the third quarter of 2017, revenue was inline with our expectations at $92 million when compared to the second quarter, revenue decreased $2.1 million or 2.3% primarily on declines in our licensing and services revenue partially offset by silicon revenue growth. GAAP gross margin for the third quarter was 58% compared to 54.4% in the second quarter. This was the high end of our expectations and reflects the stability as we execute to our gross margin model. Our margin improvement in the third quarter is largely the result of certain second quarter period costs that did not recur in the third quarter. You can see on Slide 13 that we have consistently delivered in our target mid-50% gross margin range, while there has been some variability that consistency within our model range is a testament to our focus and our product portfolio. Our diversification of both customers and end markets has helped us to mute dramatic adverse margin impact from our occasional handset wins. Third quarter operating expenses were $90.8 million on a GAAP basis and $44.6 million on a non-GAAP basis. The increase in our GAAP basis operating expenses over the second quarter was due primarily to $36.2 million intangible asset impairment charge. This charge was related to our previously announced strategic decision to seize future investment in wired silicon product development as we concentrate our resources on higher potential growth opportunities. Third quarter non-GAAP operating expenses were down about 3% from the second quarter primarily driven by our recent cost reduction efforts. OpEx remains a primary focus area for us. As you can see on Slide 14, we have reduced our non-GAAP operating expenses by…

Thanks Max. In terms of our specific expectations for Q4, revenue for the fourth quarter 2017 is expected to be between approximately $92 million and $97 million. Gross margin percentage for the fourth quarter of 2017 is expected to be approximately 56% plus or minus 2% on both GAAP and a non-GAAP basis. Total operating expenses for the fourth quarter of 2017 are expected to be approximately $54 million plus or minus 2% on a GAAP basis and approximately $43 million to $45 million on a non-GAAP basis. In summary, we are very optimistic about our business moving forward and the ability to capture more than our fair share of growth opportunities we outlined earlier. We remain focused on driving growth, increasing free cash flow, paying down our debt and maximizing our shareholder value. This concludes our prepared remarks. Operator, we would now be happy to take any questions.

[Operator Instructions] And your first question comes from the line of Christopher Rolland.

Good afternoon guys. This is David Haberle on behalf of Chris Rolland. Nice job on the gross margin mix up there. We just wanted to get some clarity on how that changed since your Analyst Day and why it's kind of at the high-end of the range there. I think you mentioned some second quarter period cost -- was that the reason or was it the industrial mix up here?

It's a little bit of both. We did have a little bit stronger industrial mix than we saw coming into the end of the quarter, but the real driver is non-recurrence of those period costs which were incurred in the second quarter.

All right, great. And then, on the industrial front, you guys had a pretty nice bounce back this quarter maybe you can add a little color there as to what occurred in that business to provide the strong sequential growth. I think it's a bit better than seasonal there.

Yes. A lot of it is just traction on our base product. We saw lot of the XO2, XO3 and some of the older products XP2 and 4k, and all of those are high volume runners for us and there was some solid growth there across the board just from a broad base. And then, we are starting to see some traction from ECP5 which started in the market about two or three years ago. So, all of those things combined with some uplift, and I think the economy helped us quite a bit.

Great. And then, last one for me here, can you guys talk about your views on USB Type C adoption and kind of what your traction has being here. I know you guys used to be a pretty bullish on USB Type C products.

Yes. That's been pretty dismal to be honest with you. We had some great opportunities, won a ton of design wins, and most of the people that we won the design wins never went to market or they laid their interactions with the markets. So, we saw very little actual revenue from that. So, we immediately switched gears to the other products that we had that were much more important to us, again, like ECP5 or XO3 or CrossLink. In CrossLink, if you know is our video product, so that is doing quite well, in fact it’s got some pretty good growth trajectory on it, and that's been one of our good products if you will from the mobile device bridging. And again, that was built off the video premise that anything would need interfaces and video or bridging would use that product, so again, USB bad, CrossLink and mobile interactions and bridging good.

All right. Thanks a lot for taking our questions.

And your next question comes from the line of Delos Elder.

Good afternoon and thank you for letting me ask you question. I was wondering, first one here, could you talk about the status of the HDMI consortium, where that stands today in terms of, I believe you are working on an agreement there?

Yes. It's really the next amendment. And what happens is every few years, you sign a different amendment, it takes seven of the founders to actually get to the agreement and they all have to agree, and we have been struggling at the standard process that happens and we don't recognize a big portion of the royalties based on that HDMI until there’s an agreement, and we don't see that agreement being signed this year and we expect that next year, we would get the kick back from that revenue.

Great. So, in terms of just thinking about the licensing and servicing business going forward into 2018, how should we think about that in terms of modeling?

Delos, this is Max. I think as we go forward into 2018, a couple of things . One, we will not have a recurrence of the patent monetization we saw in 2017. And then, secondly, the second big change there is that, in 2018, for the HDMI royalties under the new revenue accounting standards, we will be able to recognize the revenue for the 2018 royalties, even if the revenue sharing agreement is not signed provided we can get our arms around a reasonable estimate of what our share will be. So, that's a little bit different than as it relates to the 2017 revenues because that the accounting standards will be different in 2018 than they are in 2017. So, modeling the IP and services revenue, I think if you are somewhere in the 4% to 6% of total revenue range, you will be okay.

Great. And then, I was wondering if you could characterize growth by segments in Q4?

Hold on a second, let me take a quick look. So, we'd expect consumer to be up, expect communications and computing to be up, and consumer would be up based on some of the Amazon, Samsung, [indiscernible] handset and consumer devices even at the expense of the handset win going down that we had before. Communications will be up, primarily based on the strength of the server platforms, and then ZTE coming back to a normal kind of communications level. Industrial and auto, we expect to be up based again on some of the initiatives that we have, things like color light, projection, broad market conditions, and robotics. And then licensing and royalties as Max talked about, we expect to be down. We are down for a couple of reasons. One is, we had a reoccur -- we won't have a recurring Technicolor settlement. We also won't have the licensing royalties once again. But, then we also have Simplay Labs that’s out of it too. So, we are going to have two or three different things that will take the licensing and those things down. But, consumer, comps and computing, and industrial, our main markets will be up.

Great. And then, finally, I was wondering, given the changes in the business, could you talk about expectations for seasonality over the course of 2018?

Yes. We had that discussion, believe it or not, just the other day. And it's a lot harder to call than it once was because when we had a lot of HDMI business, there was this certain seasonality going into Christmas and going to CES and those things. With the digital TV business shrinking so much, and the different ramp rates of the consumer mobile handsets being the two big OEMs and nobody else really is big of a factor, it really isn't as seasonal as it once was. So, the question for us walking into Q1 will be -- is it going to be seasonably flat, up, or something else. And we don't have projections out that far today. But, I think the seasonality of our business is going to change dramatically. Because remember in 2014, we also had comps that was primarily first, second, and third quarter up, and then consumer was typically Q3, Q4. So, we would see this bizarre seasonality. So, it's hard for us to predict, but I can tell you this. If you listen to the Analyst Day, the nice thing as we've got a stable business that we are focused on with these other initiatives which are our growth factors. And with the stability of the base business being a little bit more predictable than we had, we should be okay with the OpEx spending targets that we got. So, as long as we are hitting the targets that we have, we should be able to be -- returning the right EPS that we are trying to achieve. So, that's really it is. We are not going to see, I don't think the big swing that we saw in the past. And we have not included big handset wins out in our future. So, if those come along, so it will be upside then we won't be spending towards those.

Great. Thank you very much.

[Operator Instructions] And your next question comes from the line of Bill Dezellem [Tieton Capital Management].

Thank you. Would you talk a little bit about the silicon image business as it remains and how it now fits with you strategically?

Yes. So, if you think about what I mentioned about vision and some of those things especially with artificial intelligence, it fits quite nicely. And the reason is, all of the video IP that we got from that merger for that acquisition was super important for us to be able to detect and also do recognition features. The nice thing about the IP is, we are able to put that on to our iCE device being our smallest device and actually do facial recognition for mobile handset that something nobody else on the planet can do. So, those are the types of opportunities that we have that have given us the capabilities both in our small, low end products like iCE, and then, our mid-range products like XO2. In the higher end detection, we can use more comprehensive or complex IP to run on our higher end products like ECB5 that gives us quite a bit more recognition and detection capability but at a much higher value. So, again, from the lowest end device that we saw for around a buck or less to the higher end device which are double-digit. We got some pretty good solutions that are all based on that video IP that we acquired. From the actual business itself, it's going down quite a bit. However, we do have some new products that are HDMI 2 whatever, I cannot suppose to give you the name of that. But, the next version of HDMI as an audio application to it, that can be rolled out now. So, we do have products that are rolling out in the AVR equipment space that are based on the next generation of HDMI. So, you will start to see a lot of those products roll out, so, we will be continued to offset some of the declines with the new business that we have. But, the big TV volumes that we had were not going to be selling products core anymore, we will be selling IP.

That is helpful.

Hey, Bill, real quick. Before the other thing, we should mention is, on the wired business that really the discussion we had, but there is wireless aspect, it's a pretty big growth going between 2017 and 2018. And that wireless aspect is a nice, but it's split between virtual reality phone both the new ones and bigger ones that are coming on. We also have projectors and stuff like that that we have always done with YHD. But, more importantly we were in one of the big handsets for the wireless USB. So, that's the connector to the camera to the phone and the essential phone. So, that's been published and we are the wireless USB connector in that. So, the wireless has actually turned out to be a really, really nice business, it's on a good growth trajectory whereas the wired business with the HDMI standardization has been fairly disappointing for us.

And at one point there was a thought that you could be migrating from the programmable components, is that Lattice traditional had to the ASSPs that silicon image historically had. To what degree is that -- it is that developing or not, or where do you see that from a future -- is that perspective?

So, one of the products that we did outline was called CrossLink, which you see in a lot of PR on. CrossLink is a programmable ASP, one of our fastest growing devices and it builds around the [MiFi] [ph] standard to LVDS and some of the other things that we are doing. You will see more products like that roll out from Lattice. The issue we had is, some of our fabric speeds on our other products weren't fast enough to be able to deliver the IP for solutions like 4k 60 or other things. So, we are working on that. However, that doesn't stop us, because there are products that we are currently in using FPGA inside of digital TVs based on the relationships. So, on one side, in the lower end, we are able to take the IP, we got from silicon image and automatically put that into our bridging, video bridging product. On the other end of the spectrum, we do sell FPGAs now into the digital TV market in companies in Japan.

Great. Thank you.

[Operator Instructions] And your next question comes from the line of Charles Loving-DeCoster [Craig-Hallum].

Hello. Thank you. I'm calling in for Richard Shannon. And I just have a couple of questions. First one as to do with something you brought up called mask costs, we were wondering what the mask costs are and we are not sure why are they excluded from OpEx, I guess is the question.

This is Max. So mask costs are generally speaking the cost when we tape out a product, right, what we spend with the fabs to do a tape out. From the perspective of our expense profile, we do incorporate, mask costs are part of OpEx spend and will be recorded as such. But, when we are talking about our cost structure targets, we are excluding mask costs from those targets simply because they tend to be fairly variable from quarter-to-quarter and not necessarily part of the underlying cost structure that we are really trying to drive down. What we don't want to get into is the scenario where we're pulling in or pushing out mask costs naturally from when those projects are completed to retain some degree of predictability with OpEx. So, we are sort of forecasting those a little bit separately. Does that make sense?

It does. Thank you.

Okay.

And I have one more question, if I could, regarding your communications and computing business, could you provide any color on what -- how much that business could grow in 2018?

It will be fairly modest growth because again remember that we did have a peak communications in 2014 and it's kind of tapered off after that. However, there is a bunch of things that convoluted that in 2016 and 2017 remember there was a government thing on the ZTE and Huawei and so there was a lot of things that were moving around. But, I think we reached stability of both of the Chinese customers today. We expect that to grow probably in the teens primarily driven by computing more than communications because communications is going to come back up and kind of level-off to a stable rate. And then you will see computing give it an uplift. So, we don't see that as dropping like other years because in the past years you've seen communications dropped pretty steadily and now we see it is flattening and coming back in the teens growth for 2017 to 2018.

Great. Thank you for answering the questions. I appreciate it.

You got it.

[Operator Instructions] And there are no further questions at this time. We will turn back to Lattice CEO for closing comments.

Okay. Thank you, operator. And thanks again to everyone for joining us on the call today. Clearly in the past couple of years it's been both interesting and challenging. Our team stayed committed, made some tough decisions and created a plan for ongoing success including generating cash, paying down our debt and increasing the shareholder value. So, I'm extremely proud what the Lattice team has accomplished over the last couple of years. It's been almost a year since we've talked to you guys. So, again, thanks for joining us today. And as always we appreciate your support.

Thank you. And this does conclude today's conference call. You may now disconnect.