Greetings and welcome to the Lattice Semiconductor Third Quarter 2024 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. I will now turn the conference over to your host, Rick Muscha, Senior Director of IR. Thank you. You may begin.

Thank you, operator, and good afternoon, everyone. With me today are Ford Tamer, Lattice's CEO, and Tonya Stevens, Lattice's Interim CFO. We'll provide a financial and business review of the third quarter of 2024 and the business outlook for the fourth quarter of 2024. If you have not yet obtained a copy of our earnings press release, it can be found at our company website in the investor relations section at latticesemi.com. I would like to remind everyone that during our conference call today, we may make projections or other forward-looking statements regarding future events or the future financial performance of the company. We wish to caution you that such statements are predictions based on information that is currently available and that actual results may differ materially. We refer you to documents that the company files with the SEC, including our 10-Ks, 10-Qs, and 8-Ks. These documents contain and identify important risk factors that could cause the actual results to differ materially from those contained in our projections or forward-looking statements. This call includes and constitutes the company's official guidance for the fourth quarter of 2024. If at any time after this call we communicate any material changes to this guidance, we intend that such updates will be done using a public forum such as a press release or publicly announced conference call. We will refer primarily to non-GAAP financial measures during this call. By disclosing certain non-GAAP information, management intends to provide investors with additional information to permit further analysis of the company's performance and underlying trends. For historical periods, we provide reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures to GAAP financial measures that can be found on the investor relations section of our website at latticesemi.com. Let me now turn the call over to our CEO, Ford Tamer.

Thank you, Rick, and thank you everyone for joining us on our call today. Seven weeks ago, I joined Lattice as CEO with great anticipation about the company's prospects. And I'm even more excited today about our potential and the significant opportunity for stockholder value creation ahead of us. One of the key messages since joining Lattice has been stability. I love the team, customers, products, partners and end markets. Over the past few years, the team at Lattice has done an impressive job transforming itself into the low-power programmable leader in the small to mid-range FPGA market. For that, I extend my sincere thanks for everyone's hard work and continued dedication. I also want to thank Esam Elashmawi for providing continuity and stability as Interim CEO. Esam has played a key role over the past six years in setting and executing Lattice’s strategic direction. I look forward to building on our partnership. Many of the investors and analysts on today's call have a history with me from Inphi, Broadcom and Agere. One of the biggest factors and drivers of my previous successes has been focus on product differentiation, which I believe creates customer benefits and market leadership. In my opinion, that combination ultimately builds long-lasting value for all stakeholders. For example, I joined the Inphi team in 2012 post IPO and over the next 10 years, we took it from $35 million in telecom revenue to a multi-billion dollar cloud [NAI] (ph) revenue business, that's now an important part of Marvell. The Inphi transformation story created over 20 times value appreciation for all shareholders. I'm confident that Lattice has similar potentials in many ways. Now moving to our Q3 results. From a high level third quarter 2024 revenue was in line with our guidance at $127.1 million. On an…

Thank you, Ford. While my corporate finance career spans more than 30 years, for the last 5.5 years, I've worked very closely with the executive leadership team at Lattice, especially the former CFO. I worked as corporate controller, but also doing many other aspects of the CFO role. I'm confident this will help ensure continued stability and precision in all our processes and financial reporting as we move forward. Let me now provide you with a summary of our third quarter 2024 results. From a high level, Q3 results were in line with expectations. Our profitability expanded, our operating cash flows more than doubled sequentially, and we continued to return cash to shareholders through share buybacks. Specifically, third quarter 2024 revenue was $127.1 million, up 2% from the second quarter, down 34% year-over-year, which reflects continued inventory normalization. Communications and computing grew sequentially 12%, driven by strength in computing, which more than offset softness in industrial and automotive. These two strategic end markets comprise over 90% of total Lattice revenue. Our Q3 GAAP and non-GAAP gross margin was 69%, reflecting the continued stability of our gross margin despite the overall market softness. Q3 non-GAAP operating expenses were flat with the prior quarter at $54 million and down 7% compared to the year-ago quarter. This is a result of our continued discipline in managing our operating expenses, particularly SG&A. As Ford told you earlier, we implemented a workforce reduction of 14% last week, which resulted in a one-time GAAP charge of $6.5 million for the third quarter 2024. This action better aligns our resources to support the current business level. Our Q3 non-GAAP operating margin was 26.6% compared to 25.4% in the prior quarter, driven by stability in our gross margin, coupled with disciplined management of operating expenses. Q3 EBITDA margin…

[Operator Instructions] Our first question here is from Tristan Gerra from Robert W. Baird. Please go ahead.

Hi, good afternoon. And just a couple of high level questions. The first one is regarding Nexus, which you launched in December 2019. Obviously, it's been a resounding success since then and the typical ramp of an FPGA historically has been seven years before revenue peak. And that suggests, unless there's something really different about Nexus, that Nexus revenue could peak sometime late ‘26. So the question is, given that it takes obviously some time between designing and volume ramp for a new product, should we expect a new product line? I know you have new iterations of Nexus every six months, but I'm thinking of a new node or something that will be different, very different architecturally that could potentially succeed Nexus at a time when the WAMP starts slowing down.

Thank you, Tristan. This is Ford. Yeah, we're very excited about the Nexus and Avant ramps. The current revenue growth, the first three quarters of 2024 are well over the first three quarter of 2023 as far as new product. And it’s driven primarily by Nexus and secondarily by Avant. So we continue to see that ramp as you’re suggesting. We are actually doubling down on both the small and large and mid-range FPGA segments. You will hear more of this leadership position at our Developer Conference in December. But we're very pleased with the differentiation that our customers are indicating we have and the benefits that small power, small size, differentiation like security and video streaming and Edge AI are providing with both Nexus and Avant.

Okay, thanks. That's very useful and great to hear. And then I wanted to see if you're able to elaborate a little bit on the traction that you're seeing in AI. It was previously quantified, but at the same time we know that traditional data center inventory digestion had a bit of an impact on everybody's top line a year ago. And could you elaborate, now you seem to have a lot of design win traction, and elaborate a little bit on the dollar content for FPGA, the adoption rate, and what makes you believe that this is sustainable, and of course, as a derivative, how should we be looking at computing and data center revenue going forward given this very promising traction that you're now getting in AI?

Excellent, Tristan. Yeah, So we in the past have broken up that number to be about $100 million. And we believe we're about slightly in the same range or slightly above that. So as a percent of revenue, you could see our AI revenue is growing. We just talked about engagement, new engagement opportunities with server and clients. So on the client side, we announced on my script, the Dell XPS design opportunity that is increasing our footprint above the Dell Latitude that was already shipping. On the server side, we started shipment of our latest NVIDIA Edge AI boards. And we did discuss the phenomenal progress we had at OCP, the Open Compute Conference with many OEMs where at one data center server platform we had in excess of a 50, 5-0, Lattice devices in one of these platforms. And then finally on my prepared remark we also discussed the fact that we are in the top five LiDAR Tier-1s and they were into many industrial display panels. So we are excited about the continued progress we're making on the client, on the servers, on the automotive, and on industrial with Edge AI. And please stay tuned for more. We encourage you to come see the many demos that we're going to have and the many partners we'll have at the Developer Conference in December. A very exciting development for us.

Great. Thank you very much.

Our next question is from Melissa Weathers from Deutsche Bank. Please go ahead.

Hi guys. Thank you for letting me ask a question. Ford, welcome to the call. I'm excited to work with you going forward. I guess I wanted to double click on your U-shaped recovery that you're talking about. Should we be thinking about the December quarter as kind of the bottom of the cycle? And do you believe that you're shipping to true end demand now, or is there still some inventory in the channel so that maybe you could -- that burn should end at some point and you would see a snap back. Just any more color on your U-shaped recovery would be helpful.

Yeah, thank you, Melissa. Yes, we do believe that what we're seeing is consistent with a broader market that's also indicating a U-shaped versus a V-shaped recovery. Overall, we continue to see softness in our largest end market, which is industrial and automotive. And in that market, we're four quarters in what's typically an eight quarter recovery. So you could see that that would point to a flattish Q4 through sort of mid-year 2025 for this inventory to sort of clear itself up. And on purpose, what we've done, we've worked with our channel partner to glide down that inventory position in the channel to where it goes back to normal inventory by sort of Q2, Q3 of 2025. And we're being applauded by this channel partner for being good partners and helping them do that and sort of getting inventory levels in the channel to normal level, which is about two to three months. So when we look at our long-term fundamentals, the demand recovers in sort of around the second half and then starts driving back to our regular run rates of 15% to 20% revenue growth in ‘26. And then if you combine all this with the sort of operating expense action we've taken, we do believe that the financial discipline that Lattice has shown in the past will shine again and show double-digit earning growth expansion in ‘25 and definitely beyond that in ‘26. Hopefully that answers the question. I'm happy to give you a lot of data. We've obviously spent a lot of time on this topic and we could spend a lot of time on this topic and we could spend a lot of time on this if needed.

Yeah, thank you so much. Maybe a little bit more color on that. Is there anything you're seeing from a pricing perspective or from a competitive perspective that could be weighing on your outlook into 2025 or do you think this is mostly market-wide dynamics?

Yeah, we believe it's mostly market-wide. We have been very disciplined and we believe more disciplined than our peers in price and supply assurance. We've talked about our pricing optimization strategy and pricing ability in the past. We -- during this difficult supply situation, we strike the right balance to ensure that our broad-based 10,000 customer had mineral disruption for their supply chain and were able to continue to operate without disruption and meet their obligations. And this was very important to us to be customer-friendly as opposed to just focusing on a few large customers aligned with certain segments. So we did a really good job, we believe, in a supply constrained world, to see it really be a very strong trusted partner for our customer and ensure that they didn't see any disruption. And so we, at this point, you could see from our gross margin that our, the stability of our gross margin, despite a product mix that's gone more towards a compute and comms which is typically harder than industrial automotive, and despite a lower revenue trend, we've been able to maintain our gross margin, which shows the durability and strength of our financial model.

Thank you, Ford.

Our next question is from Christopher Rolland from Susquehanna International Group. Please go ahead.

Hi, guys. Thanks for the question. So, Ford, welcome aboard, I guess, for the second time. But I just wanted to kind of bigger picture ask you, just given your heritage in kind of AI and networking, did you have some early thoughts on how FPGAs, either low end or mid-tier, could have a role there? I don't know if it could ever make it into a transceiver, if it could ever be paired with, I don't know, a DSP or something like that, I don't see a logical fit, but just anywhere in these interconnects or maybe some AI applications that we haven't thought about and/or even IOT at the Edge, AI IOT at the Edge, I don't know. But just given your heritage, maybe you can talk to these opportunities and are these some of the brightest you see for Lattice?

Thank you, Chris. I appreciate the question. So maybe I'll divide the answer into two parts. Since joining, I've been talking about self, and you've got a bit of background, if you don't mind muting, Chris, or I don't know if that's you, but can you mute us? Okay, thank you so much. So I'll answer the question in two parts. Number one, since I joined, I've been talking about self, S-E-L-F, which says we control our own destiny. And what that is, is stabilize, execute, lead, and focus. So stabilize, we've got good team, good product, good strategy. E, execute on the roadmap that we currently have. L, lead with low power, small size, differentiation like security, video and AI. And number 4, F for focus. And here we're focused on really Nexus and Avant. So that's what we're doing. Coming to AI now, we're actually above all the trends you're discussing. So for example, when you talk about a transceiver, the device that sits between that switch and the many optical modules to light the LED and provide things like telemetry and all kinds of measurement function as sort of this bridge between if you wish to switch and these optical transceiver. We're sitting in there providing this bridging and sort of LED and control type of function. If you look at the server, we've got many application on servers And we're designing the top 10 server in the world today. So that's many applications on server. Same with IOT, same with clients, same with -- all the applications you mentioned were designed then doing things like pre-processing, HMI, user and object detection, gesture and gaze, defect detection, security, 3D audio with head tracking. So many applications of AI were not always on data paths. Sometimes we are, and most of the time, we're probably quite 20-80, 20% in the data paths and 80% more of a sort of supporting function, not the main chip. But you're going to see as in all of the applications and given our current focus on AI, you're going to see us in more application. So I do expect our percent of revenue coming from AI to grow over time, Chris. And you're on mute if you have another question.

Yes, thank you for that, Ford, I appreciate. And maybe for a follow-up, some of your FPGA competitors have married their kind of FPGA fields with a hardened arm core. I think there's also the potential for even a microcontroller. I think the last management team didn't seem particularly interested in this. I was wondering if maybe you would revisit this and whether you think this is interesting at all. Thank you.

Yeah, thank you, Chris. You should come to our Developer Conference, which I think you'd be attending and see the many partners we have on the microcontroller side. And, so whether it's a long list, whether it's NXP or ST or Renaissance or many of the other ones, we're going to have many microprocessor partners that are designed in with us. So instead of having our own, we partner with them. And again, instead of having our own AI accelerator, we partner with companies like NVIDIA and others, including Habana and AMD to provide companionships on all of these. So we believe that not having our own is actually an advantage because we end up being sort of the friendly partner. And furthermore, we have developed and delivered to our partners SOC development tools. It's called Propel, P-R-O-P-E-L. That is our development tool that actually enables some of these designs to go to market.

Thank you.

Our next question is from Quinn Bolton from Needham and Company. Please go ahead.

Hey, Ford, welcome to Lattice. I guess a couple of questions. Ford, it sounds like you're describing a lot of the headwinds that the company's facing as being more industry-wide, but I guess I look at your competitors, Xilinx, Altera, both of those companies saw revenue trough in the March quarter and they saw sequential growth throughout the rest of 2024. Lattice is seeing sort of the opposite pattern where it looks like Q1 may be the highest revenue in the quarter and Q4 is the lowest And so you're showing a different trend than the two largest competitors. And so I'm wondering if you had any thoughts why you may be seeing something different than your big competitors. And then I've got a follow-up question as well.

Yeah, Quinn, look, it's a good question. We've got very detailed data. I've got a graph right in front of me here that tracks this back to Q1 of 2023. And if you track this back to Q1 of 2023, our performance is twice as good as the worst one of these two and 50% better than the other guys. So we're doing based on sort of tracking a longer term view from where the peak was. So if you take a 2023 view, you'll see us do much better. If, of course, you can always, take data and come up with any trends you want. So, sure, if you map this over the past six months, you may see something different. But we believe the really fair way to do this is to track this over a longer term period and you see us do better than competitors by a long shot. We're not even close as far as our performance. And we have been taking shares. So if you look at our view of the share, against these two companies, we believe that we have continued to expand our share. We're introducing new products And especially if you track this and the small to mid-range FPGA without SOC, because we're not into that market, we don't have SOC. So if you look in the apple-to-apple SAM, which is small and mid-range, no SOC, we'll show you we're taking shares.

Got it, okay. Thanks for that, Ford. And then I just wanted to maybe follow up on Melissa's question just about sort of where do you think consumption is? If I take your guidance for fiscal ‘25, looks like revenue up low single-digits year-on-year, probably puts you at about $525 million for the year, something like $130-or-so million a quarter. Is that the right level to be thinking about what end consumption or POS data supports or would you -- are you looking at POS even though revenues below that level as POS sort of higher than that $130-or-so million a quarter level?

Yeah, I think those numbers for revenue are right. I'm going to let Tonya chime in here. Tonya, do you want to take this question?

Sure. And that's a great question. And you're exactly right. When we look forward to 2025, as you heard in Ford's prepared remarks, we believe that disti inventory currently is at the high end of the pre-pandemic levels and we believe through 2025 that will get more to the mid-range of our target range. So as a result of that, we do believe our revenue will be lower than the actual end consumption, depending on, of course, the specific market.

So POS should be sort of at $130 million or higher next year, it sounds like, since you're going to be consuming inventory at least. Yeah, certainly it looks like through the first half of the year.

That's correct. That's correct, Quinn.

Okay. Thank you.

Our next question is from Srini Pajjuri from Raymond James. Please go ahead.

Thank you. A couple of questions. Ford, for the very near term, as we look out to the next quarter and also into the first half of next year, I look at your two different segments, one obviously going through a cyclical correction in auto and industrial, fairly well known. But the other one, you're basically doing quite well when it comes to servers because of the content increases. Those are, I believe, secular. And also you talked about AI design wins. So I'm a little surprised as to why we're seeing the weakness in the short term. Is it primarily still auto industrial correcting or are you seeing some correction in the comms and compute as well?

Srini, I think the -- let me share with you numbers that are public that you know. So if you were to go back, let's say to Q1 of 2023, at that time in Q1 of 2023, industrial auto was 59% of revenue and comms compute was 36% of revenue. And so if you fast forward now to this quarter we just announced in Q3, industrial auto is 43% and comms and compute is 48%. So you could see a pretty big shift from one to the other. And so despite that, despite this product mix and despite lower revenue, we have been able to maintain a solid cross margin and solid financial operating metrics on the EPS, EBITDA, free cash flow, which jumped nicely quarter-on-quarter. And furthermore, going forward into ‘25 and ‘26, we should be back up into the right and back in good shape. But you've had a pretty big change here from -- in these end segments that they would have been able to weather because of the growth in the compute and comms. And again, if you look at compute and comms, obviously comms has not been very strong because of 5G being delayed. So you could even read further into that that compute is actually quite strong.

Okay, and you expect that to continue in the next few quarters, Ford? Are you seeing any changes there as well?

No, we do expect that to continue. And as Tonya just answered that we do expect the POS now being higher than revenue and so we continue to glide down that inventory to mid-year 2025 and then after that we're back up to the right. It's just, we're a couple of quarters away from this. And in the meantime, we'll have the financial discipline to continue to drive good earnings expansion.

Fair enough. And then a quick follow-up on the workforce reduction. The guidance for next quarter, $52 million to $54 million, does that fully reflect the 14% workforce reduction? And then, Ford, I think at the Analyst Day, you're still maintaining that 15% to 20% that was communicated at the Analyst Day. And at that time, I think the management communicated about 30% OpEx. Is that still valid or given the cost cuts should we expect something below the 30% longer term? Thank you.

Yeah, and I'll take that. This is Tonya. Your first question on our OpEx guidance, of course the workforce reduction isn't done at the beginning of the quarter and takes time to fully implement, but our operating expense guidance does contemplate our assumptions around that workforce reduction. And we do expect that to continue to benefit our 2025 results as well. So if you're thinking about our 2025 model, Ford mentioned in his prepared remarks that we expect low single-digit revenue growth in 2025 compared to ‘24, improving as the year goes on. And we come out of the inventory digestion cycle about mid-2025. We expect margin to be primarily flat year-over-year, But we expect sort of high single digit OpEx reduction compared to ‘24, mid to high, compared to ‘24 as a result of both the headcount and non-headcount OpEx reductions and it's a 14% reduction in our headcount and our higher OpEx run rate. We also, you saw, guided our non-GAAP tax rate. It's expected to be in the mid to high single-digits then as we carry forward into 2025. And all of those factors provides a low double-digit EPS earnings expansion, outpacing revenue growth. So that's kind of how we're thinking about it.

Got it. Thank you.

[Operator Instructions] And our next question here is from Ruben Roy from Stifel. Please go ahead.

Yeah, hey, thank you. Hi, Ford. I wanted to ask for just on new products, and it's great to hear that the new product growth has continued. But when I think about 2025, obviously, we've got these industry headwinds which are well known, I guess, at this point. But we're also expecting higher [ISP] (ph) Avant to kind of roll into the model. I guess the question is, the incremental from Avant, has anything changed given what's going on with the end market, in the way you're thinking about the Avant rollout for next year? Is it maybe delayed a little bit from sort of earlier expectations or no changes there and it's really just the core products and the core markets that are creating these sort of headwinds that are driving the U-shaped recovery expectations?

Yeah, no, thank you, Ruben. Nice to reconnect. Yeah, no change on Avant. We're pleased with the traction of Avant. We continue to drive increased design win with revenue from new product expect to be in the double digits for ‘24 and continue to grow from there led by Avant. So the opportunity for the Avant is bigger as shown from the funnel opportunity that we're seeing for Avant is quite bigger than the same time ramp in Nexus. So we're seeing early revenue for Avant E which is what we have introduced some time ago. Avant G and X are on track for productization in Q4 and early revenue. And then we expect Avant revenue in the second half, the second year of the platform launch will exceed what we sell for Nexus in that second year. And so we're excited about Avant and we'll tell you more about them at the Developer Conference.

Okay, thanks for that, Ford. And then if I could just ask a quick follow-up on the comment you made in reference to the communications part of communications and computing. We've seen sort of the progress and the success in the compute part as you mentioned. On the communications part, we are starting to hear some data points that would suggest that there's a bottoming on comm infrastructure and maybe even a little bit of improvement here exiting the year. Is that kind of the way you're thinking about that business or is the comm part still a potential area of headwind as we look ahead to 2025? Thank you.

Yes, I mean, Ruben, I think your characterization is correct. And so we do expect comps to normalize and second half of ‘25 be on track to grow along with the rest of the portfolio.

Okay. Thank you, Ford.

Thank you, Ruben.

Our next question is from Joshua Buchalter from TD Cowen. Please go ahead.

Hey guys, congrats on the first earnings call at Lattice and thank you for taking my question. I wanted to ask about some of the assumptions and follow up on some of the earlier comments that are going into the low single-digit percent growth next year. I know you've given us a timeframe of when you expect digestion to cease. But anyway you can quantify the magnitude. And I guess the real reason to ask is, the prior management team had put out the 15% to 20% long-term growth target. Is that still the right number you're thinking about or is that under evaluation right now? Thank you.

Yeah, thank you, Josh. The prior target of 15% to 20% revenue growth is still the correct targets. We're not changing that. We're saying in my prepared remark, we did comment that we expect that -- we expect to come back to that guide of 15% to 20% in 2026. We also said this U-shaped recovery would probably, we expect the revenue to be flattish in Q4, Q1, Q2 of next year. And then as this inventory situation normalizes to start seeing growth in the second half of next year leading to this stronger growth into 2026.

Got it, thank you. And then for my follow-up, I think the prior management team had mentioned that inventory in the channel was a little at the high end, but still within a range that it was comfortable with, but they were more concerned about end customer inventory levels. Is that how you're seeing it too? It sounds like a little bit of a change in that you're trying to get the channel level down as well. And I'd be curious to hear how you feel about visibility and to end customer inventory in particular for pre-Nexus products as Nexus and Avant ramp to become more of a mix and you go through the digestion.

Yeah, thank you. I’ve been -- Josh, been pretty impressed with the amount of data the team has here on POS, on what's at the channel, what's at Lattice, what's at customer. So a lot of data and we've been tracking this. Our book-to-bill has steadily improved over the past four quarters from very low level to close to 1. And so we're seeing that normalization happen. It's taken a bit longer in industrial automotive than maybe prior expectations, but I think it's aligned with the broader market trends in our peers. And so again, we expect this channel inventory to be back to the midpoint in 2025. And, Tonya, I think you have a bit more data.

Yeah, I think it's consistent with what you said. I think we've always said that it, that the inventory can fluctuate on a quarterly basis. We have pretty good visibility into the disti inventory, as Ford said, tracking end consumption out of the disti. It is the inventory all the way at the end customer because, like Ford said, we have over 10,000 end customers that it's a little harder to see, But we think we now have a better handle on it. We're, like Ford said, looking to get to that disti inventory more to the midpoint of our target range through mid 2025.

That's helpful, color. Thank you. I appreciate it.

Thank you, Josh.

Our next question is from Duksan Jang from Bank of America. Please go ahead.

Hi, thank you for taking my question. You mentioned that Q1 and Q2, you expect revenue to be flattish. Is that a company overall number or is that industrial specific? Because I've heard from your peers and also other industrial exposed semis that Q1 tends to be pretty seasonal. So, any comment would be helpful. Thank you.

Yeah, thank you, Duksan. We're saying that the revenue will be flattish from Q4 of ‘24 through Q1, Q2 of ‘25. We are not obviously not guiding. Just these expectations we're not guiding to those quarters but that's the expectation.

I see. And then one on servers. The previous management team has been pretty big in talking about the content expansion gen over gen in the servers. Are you still seeing that sort of coming through in the current generation of CPUs and should we still expect this trend to continue into the next one as well?

Yes, thanks, Duksan. Yes, we were seeing it, as I said, at the Open Compute show where we had many OEMs and ODM designs on the show floor. Lattice was on display on many of these boards with over 50, 5-0 lattice FPGA was in each rack and expect these partners to have very significant demand for server racks in 2025. So, not only have we increased the content per server, we've also increased the design footprint where we now design into the top 10 server makers for this market. So very excited about both trends that should increase our revenue in 2025.

That's great, Thank you, Ford.

We have time for one additional question. Question here is from David Williams from Benchmark Company, please go ahead.

Hey, good afternoon. Thanks for letting me ask the question here. And Ford, let me also send my congrats and welcome. One I wanted to ask just quickly on the pipeline of design which you have seems quite strong. And just wondering if you think we'll see a potential inflection as the markets improve and just kind of how some customers are likely delaying their product launches. Are you seeing that? Are you hearing it? Just maybe any caution around their product launches and how that can inflect.

Yeah, thank you, David. I'm very excited about the footprint of these design wins because they range anywhere from the top 10 server and storage, the top 10 leading comms, the top 10 factory automation, the top tier auto OEMs, the top PC OEMs. Across many of the application, we talked about AGI, imaging and vision, robotics, motion control, various automotive both in car and ADAS type application, test and measurement, video broadcast, system control, power interfacing, security, sensor integration and fusion and then many in specialized harsh environment including avionics and defense type applications. So the applications are varied. We continue to be very pleasantly surprised about the wide range of applications that our customers are using Nexus and Avant for. And we're very confident that we continue to have some great differentiation from a low power and low size, small size and cost effective solutions and security, video streaming. So very excited about what the future brings across thousands of applications across 10,000 customer base. So stay tuned and please look forward to seeing you in person at the Developer Conference December 10, 11 in San Jose.

Thanks. Thanks so much for that. And then just one last one if I may here. It seemed like the prior leadership was, they ran a fairly lean organization and surprise here the 14% OpEx or headcount reduction there. Could you give maybe some color just around where you're able to define those cuts and what that means you think in terms of further development down the road, does it impact you at all?

Yeah, thank you, David. So we took action, we're done, it's behind us, and now we're back to execution. And we had to do it to maintain the financial discipline of our model, and you'll see the benefits and very strong EPS and EBITDA next year. You did hear us in Q3 of ‘24, talk about an EBITDA of 33.7%. And so if you grow this at low double-digit into next year, you could see we end up with very strong EBITDA next year. And so that's the financial discipline and benefit of doing this, but we're done. There's no impact on the product roadmap because we moved a lot of these resources from sort of high cost geography to lower cost geography. I just came back from Penang and Manila and I'd be on my way to Shanghai and Montreal and Austin and after this to Taiwan and Pune in India. And so we've done a good job sort of balancing the headcount between these geographies. And right now we feel like we've got the right level of investment to support our growth and the numbers we discussed with you on this call.

Thank you. I'd like to turn the floor back to Lattice Semiconductors CEO, Mr. Ford Tamer.

Thank you, operator, and thank you everyone for joining us on today's call. As you heard earlier, I am excited about the opportunity to build on Lattice's strong foundation, broad customer base, highly differentiated products, and strong partner ecosystem. We intend to leverage that foundation with our three-part strategy of continuing our diligent financial discipline to achieve the highest ROI, maintaining market leadership, and implementing our laser focus on AI applications. Thank you for being on today's call and for your continuous support. I look forward to sharing the company's progress with you in the coming quarters. Operator, that concludes today's call.

This concludes today's teleconference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you again for your participation.