Joseph H. Griffith
Management
Got it. Yeah. From a sensitivity perspective, you know, the $4 million of potential risk, it would be impactful. You know, if we do not land the $3 million or so in high probability orders anticipated from those federal and defense customers, and maybe the million dollars that need to export licenses. Then unless we can partially offset and get to the low end of our revenue range, it will be a challenge. You know, it's hard to offset the gross margin loss, and we need to be at the low end really to from the range to achieve our target. But we will look for ways to minimize the revenue risk but we do need to scale to get to our Q4 adjusted EBITDA positivity goal. So, I mean, just reiterate a bit, you know, we are holding our revenue guidance steady in our base case, which the $54 million to $56 million for the year. A minimum will need to be at that low end. Easier if Q4 revenues are near the midpoint of that range or even the higher, but at least at the minimum, the adjusted gross margins in the mid to high fifties we have been talking about. And on the Q4 OpEx, excluding noncash stock comp and intangibles in, call it, $11 million not far off from where we were in Q3, really benefiting from the impact of the facility transition and other cost savings we have done. So revenues are the most critical and crucial. As you might expect, you know, of those factors driving positive adjusted EBITDA in Q4, as we think about '26 and adjusted EBITDA, you know, we will be working towards getting there on a full-year adjusted EBITDA. You know, there is seasonality. So from a revenue perspective, I would expect it to flip back to negative earlier in the year we are not at the same scale as Q4. And I think our history has shown that there is, you know, a ramp in the back half typically. On the adjusted EBITDA.