Good afternoon and welcome to the Magnite Third Quarter 2023 Earnings Conference Call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. [Operator Instructions] After today's presentation, there'll be an opportunity to ask questions. [Operator Instructions] Please note this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Nick Kormeluk of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you, operator and good afternoon everyone. Welcome to Magnite's third quarter 2023 earnings conference call. As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded. Joining me on the call are Michael Barrett, CEO, and David Day, our CFO. I would like to point out that we have posted financial highlight slides on our Investor Relations website to accompany today's presentation. Before we get started, I will remind you that our prepared remarks and answers to questions will include information that may be considered to be forward-looking statements, including but not limited to statements concerning our anticipated financial performance and strategic objectives including the potential impacts of macroeconomic factors on our business. These statements are not guarantees of future performance. They reflect our current views with respect to future events and are based on assumptions and estimates, and subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from expectations or results projected or implied by forward-looking statements. A discussion of these and other risks, uncertainties, and assumptions is set forth in the company's periodic reports filed with the SEC including our third quarter 2023 quarterly report on Form 10-Q and our 2022 annual report on Form 10-K. We undertake no obligation to provide forward-looking statements or relevant risks. Our commentary today will include non-GAAP financial measures including contribution ex-TAC or less traffic acquisition cost, adjusted EBITDA, and non-GAAP income per share. Reconciliations between GAAP and non-GAAP metrics for our reported results can be found in our earnings press release and in the financial highlights deck that is posted on our Investor Relations website. At times in response to your questions, we may offer additional metrics to provide greater insights into the dynamics of our business. Please be advised that this additional detail may be one-time in nature and we may or may not provide an update on the future of these metrics. I encourage you to visit our Investor Relations' website to access our press release, financial highlights deck, periodic SEC reports, and the webcast replay of today's call to learn more about Magnite. I will now turn the call over to Michael. Please go ahead, Michael.

Thank you, Nick. I'm happy to report results for Q3 that exceeded our topline guidance for total CTV and DV+ contribution ex-TAC, while delivering strong profitability and free cash flow. Our DV+ business performed very well, delivering contribution ex-TAC growth of 12% despite a depressed CPM market. Moreover, in CTV, we continue to grow our market share with ad spend growing over 20% year-over-year, exceeding industry growth estimates. We were pleased with our execution in the quarter as we continue to solidify our position as the leading independent player in CTV. And as product mix shifts stabilize and macro ad spend returns to normal, we believe our CTV contribution ex-TAC growth will, over time, approach our ad spend growth. In this respect, it's important to remember that we are still in the early days of programmatic CTV. Marquee publishers are just now ramping AVOD and their inventory is limited and in high demand by advertisers. With this dynamic, pubs generally refer to sell programmatic deals through their direct sales teams. The good news is they are using our technology to execute those transactions. However, as we've explained previously, the programmatic direct business carries a lower take rate versus when we sell the inventory and layer on more services. We believe that as programmatic CTV scales, buyers will want to purchase the majority of their CTV programmatically, using advanced data targeting with embeddable environments, a process that can't be executed using a direct sales team. This evolution will attract a significantly broader advertiser base, increased ad spend, a more competitive CPM environment, and better ROI and COGS for both buyers and sellers We had some noteworthy customer wins this quarter, announcing that we'd be powering the Disney+ biddable marketplace via Magnite streaming as well as an expansion in our partnership with…

Thanks Michael. Total revenue for Q3 was $150 million, up 3% from Q3 of 2022. Contribution ex-TAC was $133 million, up 4%. CTV contribution ex-TAC was $52 million, down 6% from $56 million last year. DV+ contribution ex-TAC was $81 million, an increase from $72 million or 12% compared to last year. Both of these exceeded the high end of our guidance ranges. Our contribution ex-TAC mix for Q3 was 39% CTV, 41% mobile, and 20% desktop. Geographically, our international results outpaced our US results led by our DV+ business with new publisher wins and overall volume growth. From a vertical perspective, travel was our strongest performing category, while weaker performing categories included retail, financial services, and media and entertainment related to the actors and writers' strikes. CTV contribution ex-TAC was negatively impacted by expected softness in managed service and by the mix shift. As a reminder, tough political comps from last year negatively impacted Q3 CTV contribution ex-TAC results by roughly 3%. DV+ continued to be an area of strength, with up 12% growth in the quarter. We continue to innovate in and are excited with the launch of native ad formats across DV+, allowing programmatic demand to target key publishers that offer native formats. We expect to continue to bring new products to DV+ that will enable our publishers to better monetize their supply. Total operating expenses, which includes cost of revenue for the third quarter were $168 million, similar to the $167 million in the same period last year. Operating expenses for the third quarter this year includes the final $8 million of non-cash accelerated amortization resulting from our platform consolidation. Adjusted EBITDA operating expense was $93 million at the midpoint of our guidance range. Adjusted EBITDA operating expense for the third quarter of last year was…

We will now begin the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Jason Kreyer with Craig-Hallum. Please go ahead.

Michael can you just step back and maybe just talk about what you see as the evolution of the connected TV transaction model for the industry. And kind of curious on what you think how that migrates from the programmatic execution that seems to be dominating more of that spend today and how that maybe evolves into a more biddable environment down the road?

Yes. Sure Jason. Great question. Yes, here's how we look at the market. We're very, very early stages. I mean if you looked at our leading CTV revenue publishers on the Magnite platform two years ago, none of them would be the top guys that we're talking about today, the plus services, the broadcasters, et cetera. They were highly specialized CTV first players. And it's not surprising that the types of advertisers that the bigger services are talking to right now, are their legacy linear advertisers. And it's not surprising that they've sold to them direct their whole existence and that they'll want to continue that method in working with those advertisers. I think we're starting to see and you can see it with services that have been around for some time, take a look at Hulu, you're starting to see this openness to biddable just largely because the buyers are wanting that to occur and they want to use more data targeting and they want to use more audience definition that may be coming from the buy side, not just the sell side. So, I think that you have that occurring with that cohort of advertisers, the desire to do more automated, to do more data targeting, to do advanced biddable environments. But in addition, we really do believe that if all of this is just about converting a couple of hundred broadcast advertisers over to CTV, we've really missed the big picture. And the big picture is 10,000 new advertisers coming in, right? Advertisers that right now, predominantly advertise on social video environments. And they're going to -- with the increasing targeting and the hyper-targeting and the advanced functionality and features that you're going to find with the shoppable ads that are coming out, that you're going to find -- that they are going to find this to be a very performing environment, and they're always going to want to be in a biddable environment. And these are the types of advertisers that a direct sales team from a large broadcaster, they're going to hire people to go call on them. So, that's where we feel as though programmatic comes into play beautifully. And lastly, all sports will be streamed if they're already most of the contracts are. And sports is ideal for a programmatic environment, timeouts, overtime, et cetera, programmatic is ideally-suited to fill those kinds of ad gaps there. So, we really think that you're going to see a maturation in the CTV environment in the not-too-distant future where it's much more of the programmatic that we're accustomed to in the DV+ side of the business, with one exception, they're not going to be using 20 SSPs. It's going to be a winner take most, and we think we're perfectly positioned for that position.

Thanks Michael. I wanted to just follow-up on managed service, see if you can give any color on how that progressed through Q3? If there's any indications on how that's going in Q4? And then maybe along with that, just I think some of that spend perhaps has been impacted by some of the strikes that are going on. And so I'm curious if that will continue to pressure spend in that category or if there's any signs that, that could be alleviated?

Yes. I'll let David give some more color. But I would say, Jason, in general, no surprises there. It's behaving as we thought it would. Managed service is impervious to macro headwinds and I would say that we're not the only company citing a Q4 that's a bit weaker than we had anticipated going into Q4 for absolute. And so managed service not an outlier there. I don't know, David, if you have any more details to share.

No, that's right. It's stabilized. And I think what's important is we've tried to take a very cautious approach in our guidance for Q4.

Thank you, gentlemen.

Thanks Jason.

The next question is from Shyam Patil with Susquehanna. Please go ahead.

Hey guys. I had a couple of questions. You guys talked about high single-digit growth next year with CTV going faster than DV+, implying, I think, low double-digit growth for CTV, can you maybe just talk a little bit about just what would be the upside factors for CTV in that scenario? And then how you see the Hollywood strikes potentially impacting CTV next year as well? And then just a follow-up, Michael, in your prepared remarks, you talked about the new tech platform and that enabling new products, new offerings, can you just talk a little bit about some specifics there? And any kind of timing on when those might be launched and potentially start contributing to revenue?

Yes, sure. I'll take the latter first, and what David talked about the upside factors related to CTV. Yes. No, I think we'll be able to, throughout 2024, roll out some of the innovation that's occurring. I mean I think a general theme is you're going to see a tighter stitching of the SpringServe ad server with the programmatic platform that Magnet streaming is. We have multiple clients that use both of them and making it more of a harmonious experience for the -- our client end user, I think, is a big goal and that's just not aesthetic, that will lead to better monetization for publishers, but that's more of a 2024 discussion, and we'll certainly be keeping in abreast of developments on a quarterly basis. And David, perhaps you want to talk about CTV for next year?

Yes, sure. And I think what would be helpful is to talk about that would be just set a little background on our perspective for 2024 from a little higher level. We're giving this guidance for 2024. We certainly don't have the same degree of confidence or visibility in 2024, as we do in Q4, just because of the time lag. But we thought it would be super helpful to share some of our thinking around what our financial profile would look like, what our margin will look like and so forth. And so with that in mind, our 2024 revenue guidance certainly reflects caution around the macro, caution in our managed service business, modest expectations from the presidential year. And so if I think about upside from a CTV perspective, certainly, I think if the macro turns around, that certainly pushes more dollars into some of our longer tail, higher take rate channels in CTV. There could be upside from the presidential election as well. So, overall, we've just tried to take a very cautious approach with a focus on giving some visibility around our cost structure.

Great. Thank you guys.

The next question is from Dan Kurnos with The Benchmark Company. Please go ahead.

Thanks. Good afternoon. Michael, I mean, you talked about kind of the tighter stitching of SpringServe ad with the SSP and you spend a bunch of time talking about sort of winner take most. I know that we saw that sort of streams press release with the Yahoo! DSP full integration with the SSP and the ad server in addition to TradeDesk through their OpenPath solution. And so I know FreeWheel has been kind of pursuing that. It feels like a -- I want to call it golden handcuffs in a way, but it feels like an opportunity to gain ad share through kind of direct integrations. Is that sort of what you're talking about? And can you kind of maybe give a little bit more color on the thought process or economics behind those deals?

Yes, Dan. Yes, we thought it was a great development. I mean, obviously, it's not a huge regulatory trend. Some of the type DSPs wanting to get direct to publishers. In DV+ with an OpenPath product like the TradeDesk has, there's a pre-bid adapter that makes it possible to be able to plug into multiple publishers. In the CTV world, there really isn't that equivalent. And so we saw an opportunity because of SpringServe in its connections with every major publisher out there in the CTV world, to use -- to enable those connections through SpringServe. So, we retain kind of the economics of that connection while some of the largest DSPs are able to have a direct pipe and pitch their clients and the efficacy of that direct pipe. It should be noted that we have seen only increased spend with someone like the TradeDesk post-Open-Path through their normal channel through the pre-bid header bidder. So, we think that this is all accretive for our publishers. Our publishers wanted access to these different dollars because it's been explained to us and into marketers that these are kind of different budgets that if the publisher doesn't connect with the DSP in this fashion, they're going to be out that revenue. And so we were delighted to be able to help our publishers capture this revenue for them. At the same time, we kind of retain our economics. And yes, I think, Dan, is part of the winner take most. You're not going to see a head of bidding world where they need 10 SSPs to be able to run a unified auction even when things become biddable for the vast majority of the publishers is going to be an invite-only auction run by 1 or 1.5 SSPs. And we think we're in a terrific position to walk with our clients as that progresses.

Got it. That's helpful. And I know international is kind of tricky ground right now, given both the macro and the conflicts out there. But I mean there's some data out there that suggests you guys took some 10 points of share sequentially in EMEA. And I'm just kind of curious how you're thinking about kind of planting the seeds and continuing to grow kind of ex-US from here?

Yes. And I'll let David talk to some of the specifics, but I was just over there last week, and the team is on fire in London. Some of it, there was quite depressed comps given we're several years now into the Ukraine war and some of that has worked its way through the system in terms of CPM pricing. But we definitely invested in that marketplace. And we -- when you look at Telaria, post-merger with Rubicon now Magnite in SpotX. It was kind of a market that neither one we're playing in. And so now you have this legacy Rubicon team being able to take these new shiny tools in their toolkit out to market. And I think that largely explains why you're seeing an acceleration of success there. David, I don't know if you have anything else to add?

I think you've covered it. A couple of specific initiatives. We took over from a reseller in the Nordics. We've opened an office in Sweden. We're seeing some nice progress there. We've opened up an office in India. So, we're also making some modest investments globally that we're excited about and should have greater payoffs in the future.

All right. Great. Thanks very much guys. Appreciate it.

Thanks Dan.

The next question comes from Laura Martin with Needham. Please go ahead.

Hi there. Good morning.

Hey Laura.

Hi. So, my favorite chart is this net leverage chart where in two years, you've gone from six times levered to 1.8. So I know you hit your goal early of being at two times -- my question is, do you want to stop here? Are you going to keep de-levering? Are you going to zero leverage? Or are you going to do sort of like stay here and then use your capital to buy in shares. Can you tell me how low that leverage, what you're aiming for, for the net leverage now that you're under the 2x?

Yes, Laura, I think -- yes, it is great. We're super excited to achieve that initial goal. I think in the current economic environment, 1x might be the new 2x. And so I think we do have aspirations, I think to lower that somewhat. We don't necessarily have a 0x. There's some benefit cost of capital benefit to having some debt out there. So, I think we'll continue to lower that to some degree, but it won't be -- we won't have the same urgency around it that we've had in the past.

Okay, that's super helpful. And I have 10 more, but I'm going to sort of take it into two. So, upfronts were really weak for my traditional media companies. And so what I'm wondering is it a weak upfront where people didn't commit to as much -- advertisers didn't commit to as much in the upfront is good for you because that frees up more money and scatter that you guys have an option on, and I'm going to tie it into this Amazon ads to your question. So, Amazon, as you know, on January 1, is going to start adding ads sort of against your willingness, the consumer pays an extra $3 a month to not have that. Is that good for you? Or is that bad for you since Amazon sort of a log guarded, Does that take share away from you? So sort of those two things that aren't really related, but I didn't want to ask three questions.

Yes. So, on the first one, I think in a normal marketplace, the assumption that advertisers withholding from the upfronts committed dollars in having dollars that they have at their leisure, they can go in to the spot market. That probably would be a net benefit for streaming and for Magnite. I think that what you're seeing is the loss upfront necessarily wasn't folks reserving dollars or spot, it was folks not having dollars to commit because of the macros. So, I think it was a lousy upfront across the board. That said, programmatic played such a big role front and center with all the upfront presentations that I think that distinction between upfront being bad for streaming and spot being good is starting to very blur. So, let's just see how that plays out when the ad spend engine kicks back in from a macro standpoint. Amazon Ad here, I think that they're going to -- in a market like this with the muted spend world, those dollars are going to be firstly fought for. And it's possible that those dollars come at the expense of Paramount or a Disney or an NBC Universal. But I do think that, generally speaking, if you look at it in a slightly longer timeframe, having another AVOD mass global service out there is nothing but good for Magnite. The whole idea that you can't be successful in this environment without having an ad peer at scale is just music to our ears. So, we think in the longer term, it's going to be fine. And Amazon isn't exactly completely out of reach for us. We're able to work with them when partners like a Disney distribute programming on an Amazon, we're able to take their share that they get from an ad sales standpoint and help them monetize it. So, on the margins we can work with Amazon.

Thank you very much. Very helpful. Thank you.

Thank you.

The next question comes from Nick Zangler with Stephens. Please go ahead.

Yes, hey guys. Good to see the upside for the quarter. Just curious on -- last quarter, as you pointed to 3Q, you called about managed service you got out the mix shift to premium services, and you called out soft [Indiscernible] spend as I guess, pressure points in CTV for 3Q. And I think it was in that order. Curious on the guide for 4Q, down 4%. Are these the same pressure points? And is it again in that same order?

Yes. I think Yes, I think it's -- I mean, we're -- so let me -- I think it's an interesting dynamic in Q3 to Q4 in CTV first to call out. The midpoint of our guide, as you mentioned, 4% down in Q4 versus a 6% down actual in Q3. If you take out the political comps from 2022, we had a 3% impact in Q3 and actually a 6% impact in Q4. And so if you factor those out, the CTV growth goes from sort of an adjusted 3% down in Q3 to actually a 2% up in Q4 on kind of an apples-to-apples taking out that comp basis. And so the comps masked, I think, a little bit of the actual growth and acceleration that we're seeing in that CTV business. And as far as drivers, I think the -- yes, I think all of those drivers in about the same order are fairly accurate.

Got it. Helpful. And then obviously, Hulu goes to Disney, and this was pretty much expected. I'd imagine maybe just a relief in general, so it doesn't go to Comcast, but any benefit that you could point to that you might see as Hulu gets fully brought in by Disney going forward? Thanks.

Yes, Nick, I think it's -- you're right. We anticipated Hulu stay in the Disney family. And I think that it's more business as usual than that presenting a huge opportunity. But again, having a service that large and the idea that there possibly could extend the brand globally, and this is just my conjecture. I have no inside information as it relates to Disney, but there's upside to the extension of the Hulu footprint and the bundling of it with other properties that could lead to more ad opportunities for us.

Great. Thank you very much and good luck going forward.

The next question is from Shweta Khajuria with Evercore ISI. Please go ahead.

Okay. Thank you. Let me try one for Michael, please. Michael, what do you think would drive inflection. Is there a flection point that you think could drive the gap between ad spend and revenue narrower? And what would that be? What should we be looking out for that gives you confidence that outside of macro, all else equal, this is what's going to help narrow that gap? Thank you.

Yes, I think I just want to macro definitely plays enrollment as we kind of had said, especially last quarter that this kind of product mix shift wouldn't be nearly as severe in a normal spend environment because media plans will be more diversified. There'd be a lot more CTV native-first publications, OEMs on the buy. And they use that different product than, say, a direct sold programmatic by one of the plus services. So, -- so I think that macro helps for sure. But I do think that it's a buyer intention. In an environment when spending is down, every dollar can bring with it so much more cloud from an agency standpoint and they're universally spoke to us, spoke to our partners and the publishers at about a desire to do much more biddable, much more data targeting and much more programmatic. And so I think that it's just -- again, the buyers have a lot of cloud in the market where dollars are in short supply to go around. And I think that, that's probably an inflection point, whether that's in the near and not-too-distant future.

Sorry, let me follow up on that. If that's the case, why would you not be seeing that happening today?

Well, keep in mind, upfronts are just now being placed, right? And you have this paucity of content that because of the strikes. So, I think in terms of -- again, it's another kind of macro challenge, but a lot of those dollars are on pause right now. So, they've been talked about to be executed programmatically, but there's not really any home to put them in to execute programmatically. So, I think that, that's part of the lag, if that makes sense, Shweta.

Okay. Thanks Michael.

The next question is from Matt Swanson with RBC Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

Yes, thank you so much for taking my question. I kind of touches on point that we've heard quite a bit here. But I guess when you're thinking about the FY 2024 guidance framework around CTV growth -- can you just kind of help us think about what your assumptions are for take rates in 2024? Like, is it assumed no change? Does it assume lower? Does it assume higher as we're kind of trying to think of that two variable model with that and the volume growth, which remains really strong.

Do you want to handle that, David?

Yes, sure. Yes. No, I think it assumes, again, some of these -- the mix shifts that we're seeing we continue to expect very robust growth in these premium channels. And so I think overall take rates as an average, will decline somewhat. But the rate of ad spend growth is significant. We see great momentum there. And as we see -- and so as we move through the year, end and then particularly as we get the presidential -- the 2022 comps behind us and into 2024, you'll see that will lead us to the kind of -- as was mentioned earlier, probably low to mid-single -- low to mid double-digit growth in CTV. In other words, the CTV growth as we guided to, is higher than DV+, and our average is high single-digits, you'll see something with a double-digit growth in CTV next year?

Yes, that's helpful. And then the context when you're giving on the adjusted EBITDA margins, I know that you pointed out to say specifically at those revenue numbers. You always seem to get a lot of leverage and to deliver that upside to the topline. Can you just help us think a little bit about that? Like are there a bunch of other investment opportunities that you'd like to go after if revenue growth ends up being better than expected? Or do you think we should expect to kind of see that drop straight to leverage?

I think you'll see if we have greater top line growth, I think you'll see a more of that drop to the bottom-line. There are a few investments on the margin that we would make. But we're making all the most important investments that we need, and that is embedded in this model. I think the other thing I'd like to call out is -- and I think we briefly mentioned it last quarter. But we will have a one-time event in Q1. We're bringing the whole company together that has cost of $4 million plus. And that actually -- it's a super important event for us. We see a lot of value in it. That will lower margins in Q1, but it also represents almost 100 basis points of margin as you look at our profile next year. And so we do that one-time event. And so the core business, we're still seeing nice flow-through even at the lower top line growth rates than what we think we'll have in the future.

Thank you.

The next question is from Dan Day with B. Riley FBR. Please go ahead.

Yes, guys, appreciate taking the questions. Michael, I wanted to come back to the point you made earlier on live sports. I agree, it feels like we're at a tipping point there, especially 2024 potential direct-to-consumer ESPN -- you've got this live sports accelerator product out there. Just wondering how active the pipeline is for new business there. and whether that's a significant piece of the business at all today immaterial? Or how much of a revenue driver you think that can be in 2024.

In 2024, it's a tricky one, right? Because all of the services aren't made available just yet -- we think it will be a contributor. There's no question. There's a little bit of a disconnect right now between piping the programmatic dollars into that environment. If you think about a way the DSPs work, generally speaking, they pace campaigns over an X period of time and they try to balance it, right, so that you're not firing off is the $1 million campaign, no one wants to spend $1 million on day 1. You want to spread over the period of time. Sports is completely different, right? It's a huge spike on a Saturday afternoon, and it's gone. And if you miss that opportunity. So, there's tweaking of the algorithms that have to work but everyone is hard at work making it work better. I think from a consumer experience, if you watch sports streaming, you understand what I'm saying, here, you're you see one more just billboard that says, will we return to programming soon, you're going to pull your hair out. So yes, I think it's a huge opportunity. I think it's one of those areas where there's much more openness from a publisher standpoint, from a premium publisher standpoint to engage with programmatic because it just makes so much sense.

Thanks. And then just another one on the DV+ post just the strength there, 12% growth, is that all mostly volume-driven? What's happening with CPMs on the Disney+, was it a pulse or a minus right now?

Yes, it -- go ahead, David.

You're going to say the same thing. Yes, CPMs are still depressed. And so it's on the volume side.

Okay. So, volume better than the growth offset by maintenance on CPM, that's what's going on

Yes.

Okay. Thanks guys. Appreciate it.

That’s sort of a lower volume, and a lower price, yes.

Okay. Thank you.

The next question is from Tim Nollen with Macquarie. Please go ahead.

Hi, thanks for taking the question and I apologize in advance, I joined the call a little bit late, so I hope this question wasn't answered, but most of my others already have been. I was curious about this news about the Disney Campaign Manager using its own ad server for automated insertion orders. I'm just curious, if you could remind us what role is your -- are you playing with Disney. So, Disney-wide, you've got Disney+, you've got Hulu, of course, and ESPN+. Can you just remind us what you're doing in terms of being the SSP for Disney if Disney uses its own ad server, if that somehow pushes you to the side if that is negative for you in any way? And lastly, on that point, it seems like the campaign manager using its own ad server is targeting local audiences, somewhere maybe that's not kind of your game anyway. So, I know it's kind of a lot of points in there. I hope you could just clarify for me. Thanks.

Yes. Tim, good question. I'll answer to the degree that I can in terms of working with Disney and some of the restrictions and talking about it. But the simple fact is the ad server, generally speaking, is out of touch for us even if it's SpringServe, right? If it publish yourselves a campaign directly, and it's delivered by the ad server unless it's SpringServe, we don't kind of participate in those economics. Now, if a publisher sells a deal directly, but it's a programmatic deal, that's when we interact. And so if anything is done programmatically within the Disney Empire, Magnite has a role in that. But direct sold, and I think what you're referring to is they were talking about a self-service tool that they have launched to try to get those local dollars, right? That's probably a step beyond our purview anyway, like our managed service business isn't necessarily a local, local business. It's oftentimes you refer to kind of a Tier 2 where you're talking about not just the car dealer, but you're talking about the car dealer with multiple locations in a region that's kind of more what we're focused upon. And so it's not necessarily cannibalistic of our advertising efforts in that area.

Okay. That's something I was hoping you were going to say is that it's more of a local effort, so it's not really your thing. Okay. Could I ask one related question, this news -- and I'm sorry, again, if this was already asked, but you discussed this already in the prepared remarks. But this news several weeks ago about FreeWheel and you integrating more with FreeWheel. I'm just curious if you could just give us a bit more color on any kind of advances you might be making with other publishers in terms of getting SpringServe a bit more integrated into their businesses? I know you're not going to overtake FreeWheel, but kind of chipping away at the business in some way, if you could provide a bit more color on that, please?

Yes. So, Tim, as we talked about the ideas and replace it it's to provide publishers with an alternative to state-of-the-art -- with state-of-the-art programmatic tools with using an ad server that was born for streaming and a platform that was born for streaming. And it's had quite a bit of success and uptake. So, FreeWheel -- a connection to FreeWheel just helps that piece of it. It used to be a little clue if you were a publisher, you used FreeWheel as your ad server, you wanted to use Magnite for your programmatic efforts, there was a bit of stitching together that fell on the publisher that created extra workload. Now, what you're dealing with is just kind of the seamless integration that allows for a publisher that uses FreeWheel to choose to use Magnite as their programmatic partner with not having to lift a finger because it's already integrated. So, we have high hopes for that. Certainly, from a buyer standpoint, buyers that are creating these marketplaces on Magnite streaming are excited about that because it gives them access to all the publishers that may not be using a SpringServe ad server. So, yes, we think it's a great deal for both companies. We've been talking with them for quite some time and happy we're able to get it to the hoop.

Okay, great. Thanks a lot.

This concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Michael Barrett for any closing remarks.

Thank you, Debbie. I would like to thank the Magnite team for their diligent effort required to deliver another strong quarter. I really like the business that we built and how well we're positioned in both CTV and DV+. We remain hard at work delivering solid financial results, building more tech, growing share, and working vigorously with our partners to prepare for the growth that we all know lies ahead. We look forward to speaking with many of you at our upcoming investor events. Macquarie will host our post-Q3 meetings tomorrow. We have a busy conference schedule in November. We'll be attending the Stephens Conference in Nashville on November 14th and 15th; the RBC Conference in New York on the 15th of November; the Craig-Hallum Conference in New York on November 16th. And the Macquarie International Conference in Sydney on November 29th and 30th. We will be hosting an Evercore Bus Tour Meeting at our office in New York on November 29th. Nick will be participating in the Wolfe Research Conference in New York on December 7th, and marketing in San Francisco on December 20th. And a little further out, we will be participating in the Needham Conference in New York on January 18th. Thank you again for joining and have a great evening.

The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.