Good morning, everyone, and thank you for participating in the Fourth Quarter 2024 Earnings Conference Call. My name is Megan, and I will be your moderator for today's call. At this time, all participants will be placed in a listen-only mode as our call is being recorded. I will now turn the call over to Magnolia's management for their prepared remarks, which will be followed by a brief question and answer session.

Thank you, Megan, and good morning, everyone. Welcome to Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation's fourth quarter 2024 earnings conference call. Participating on the call today are Chris Stavros, Magnolia's President and Chief Executive Officer, and Brian Corales, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. As a reminder, today's conference call contains certain projections and other forward-looking statements. The meeting of the federal securities laws. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in these statements. Additional information on risk factors that could cause results to differ is available in the company's annual report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC. The full Safe Harbor can be found on slide two of the conference call slide presentation with the supplemental data on our website. You can download Magnolia's fourth quarter 2024 earnings press release as well as the conference call slides from the Investors section of the company's website, at www.magnoliaoilgas.com. I will now turn the call over to Mr. Chris Stavros.

Thanks, Tom, and good morning, everyone. We appreciate you joining us for our discussion of our fourth quarter and full year 2024 financial and operating results. I plan to briefly speak to our full year results in the fourth quarter, which closed out another year of strong, reliable performance and execution aligned with Magnolia's business model. This was helped by some conscious actions taken around reducing our field-level operating costs. I'll briefly highlight how our business model and core principles can continue to deliver results that compound per share value, as evidenced through Magnolia's performance since its founding. Finally, I'll conclude by providing an outlook of Magnolia's 2025 capital and operating plan, which is expected to deliver moderate growth with a similar level of capital spending while providing additional capture of low-cost resource opportunities. Brian will then review our financial results in greater detail and provide some additional guidance before we take your questions. Starting on slide three of the investor presentation and looking at the highlights, Magnolia ended 2024 on a high note with across-the-board strength both financially and in our operations. Record quarterly production volume during the fourth quarter of 93.1 thousand barrels of oil equivalent per day lifted full-year 2024 total production to 89.7 thousand BOE per day. This amounted to annual total company production growth of 9% for a second consecutive year, with full-year oil production growth of 11% exceeding our original expectations. Our total production at Giddings grew 16%, with oil growing 21%, partially supported by a prior year acquisition in addition to strong well productivity and a continued expansion of our development area in Nassau. Total adjusted net income for the year was approximately $401 million. Adjusted EBITDA was $953 million, and our D&C capital spending of $477 million led to a reinvestment rate…

Thanks, Chris, and good morning, everyone. I'll review some items from our fourth quarter and full-year results and refer to the presentation slides found on our website. I'll also provide some additional guidance for the first quarter of 2025 and the remainder of the year before turning it over for questions. Magnolia ended 2024 on a strong note highlighted by steady and consistent execution. During the fourth quarter, we generated total net income of $89 million, with total adjusted net income of $95 million, or $0.49 per diluted share. Our adjusted EBITDAX for the quarter was $236 million, with total capital associated with drilling completions and associated facilities of $132 million. For the full year, adjusted EBITDAX was $953 million, with D&C capital representing 50% of EBITDAX. Fourth-quarter production volumes grew 9% year-over-year to 93.1 thousand barrels of oil equivalent a day. For the full year, production volumes grew 9% to 89.7 thousand barrels of oil equivalent a day, with oil growth of 11%. During the year, we repurchased a total of 11 million shares, and our diluted share count fell by 5% year-over-year. Looking at the quarterly cash flow waterfall chart on slide eleven, we started the year with $401 million of cash. Cash flow from operations before changes in working capital was $919 million, with working capital changes and other small items impacting cash by $11 million. During the year, we paid dividends of $107 million and allocated $273 million toward share repurchases. We added $165 million of bolt-on acquisitions through the year. We incurred $487 million on drilling completions, facilities, and leasehold, and ended the year with $260 million of cash. Looking at slide twelve, this chart illustrates the progress in reducing our total outstanding shares since we began our repurchase program in the second half of…

We will now begin the question and answer session. Please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. The first question comes from Neal Dingmann with Truist Securities. Please go ahead.

Congratulations, guys, another great quarter. Chris, my first question is just on your well cost, specifically one time I know you all had a good bit of your well cost included a number of tests that you performed downhole before actually producing the well. I'm just wondering, you know, now when you look at the plan, are you still doing a fair amount of science as you drill some of these Giddings wells, or is it now just strictly a development program?

Morning, Neal. Thanks. You know, we're sort of down the path pretty good here. We've been doing this for a while, several years in Giddings certainly after COVID fairly consistently. So you know, the science now is probably far and away more limited maybe to some of the newer areas. And I would tell you that we're more down the development path in Giddings other than maybe some of the appraisal activity, which is a bit different. But as far as, you know, pouring actual science down wells, it's more limited right now, so it's really more pure development.

No. That's great to hear. And then second on shareholder return, I believe, you know, I continue to think you all want more appropriate dividend and buyback policies. I'm just wondering assuming you don't probably spend too much terribly on bolt-on and other opportunities, and the cash position continues to grow to, I don't know, five, six hundred million. Are you comfortable keeping that on the balance sheet or would there be various other strategic plans?

Thanks. Well, we've seen this happen before. You know, where the cash built to seven hundred million for a little bit of time, I call it the winnings during a period of very high product prices and then with a little bit of patience, not believing that it would burn a hole in our pocket for too long. You know, we deployed it when the time was right. You know? Or, you know, when we saw attractive opportunities come along. So I'm not averse to seeing it happen and holding on to the cash for a little bit of time. But not a lengthy period of time. I just don't think that it would occur for that long. So, anyway, I think there'll be things that always come up.

Our next question comes from Oliver Huang with TPH.

Good morning, Chris and Brian, and thanks for taking the questions. I know you all are fairly conservative when it comes to booking of reserves, but it would appear that you all have quite a bit of gassy inventory that gets very low credit from the market. So just kind of wondering what it would take to just lean into that acreage a bit more just kind of given the trajectory of gas prices in the near term to maybe unlock some of that value there.

Yeah. I guess part of the answer is that, you know, I think our cost structure has seen quite a bit of improvement. So, you know, it all starts with well economics and some of the actions that we've taken the last couple of years around reducing our well costs may have improved the returns in certain areas that might have been previously a little bit more marginal and puts us in a much better position. You know, we continuously revisit, review these areas to see if they could work. And revisit them again as we further optimize just in terms of other efficiencies. So look, I think, you know, built exactly the same within our extensive position in Giddings, the five hundred fifty thousand acres. You know, probably not. There's probably some variability in the performance or whatnot or any acreage. But you know, will more of it work out over time? Probably, yes. Because we're learning more every day, and that's part of the gonna be part of the appraisal work that we're doing this year and so I think it's more along the lines of stay tuned. Probably have more to say about it or you'll just see it happen with a little bit of time.

Okay. Makes sense. And maybe for a follow-up question just on well cost. I know you all have done a good job of lowering well cost over the past couple of years, first starting with the completion side, then moving to the drilling side last year. But just kind of wondering, are there any immediate levers or line of sight to things that you could potentially do maybe along the lines of longer laterals just given how contiguous the acreage is? And if not, is there anything in particular that's keeping you all from kind of taking that step?

No. Nothing that's preventing us from taking the step. I mean, again, you know, we continue as I said, it really all starts with the economics and that we're in a much better position right now. So you know, we're examining different parts of the field and trying to test some new things. And you know, push the boundaries a little bit around the field. So I, you know, it seems to me before we go out and pay, you know, four or five, six million or whatever per undrilled location, that we should probably take a closer look within the acreage that we already own. So as I mentioned, we gathered a lot of data, subsurface, and also from some of the assets that we've acquired, in the northern part of Giddings, southern part of Giddings, and as we integrate and optimize some of the learnings from those assets, it should allow us to expand some of the boundaries of the field and actions that we've already taken around not just the cost, but also some of the optimization around inventory, etcetera, I think it's led to us adding tens of thousands of incremental lateral feet to our drilling inventory. And over time, it'll likely amount to multiples of that. So we continue to test some concepts. And think it's gonna go well for us over time.

Awesome. Thanks for the time.

The next question comes from Carlos Escalante with Wolfe Research. Please go ahead.

Hi. It's McKinley in for Carlos. So it's good. Saw four fifteen. Thank you guys for taking my questions. So my question is, what does your 2025 capital program afford to say? It's saying capital say about your long-term sustained capital? And, my second question is, how close are you guys to dropping a rig? Even if partial is going forward? Thank you.

Yeah. I feel very comfortable with the range of capital spending, the $460 million to $490 million that we gave. You know, sort of the midpoint is right around, you know, certainly at current product prices, what it'll take to generate the type of growth that we talked about, the 5% to 7% and lower single-digit oil growth. I wouldn't imagine that we'd have to if your question was around slowing activity or dropping a rig, I wouldn't and certainly at current product prices, it's not gonna happen. I would imagine that that would have to be something, you know, below $60 before we even thought about that. On oil, I don't see that happening right now, but, you know, we're prepared to do it. We have a lot of optionality and flexibility in the program. We've done a lot to improve our cost structure, and so we're well set up to achieve what we plan to achieve for this year. So I think I expect the plan to be fairly steady.

Thank you.

The next question comes from Zachary Parham with JPMorgan. Please go ahead.

Good morning. Just wanted to ask on the trajectory of your expected production through the year. You talked about 1Q CapEx being the high point of the year. Should that drive more growth in 2Q and then maybe flatten out in the back half? Just curious if you could provide some color there?

Thanks, Zach. Yes. So I expect it to grow ratably through the year. It may, you know, you may see some variability, but I expect it to grow fairly ratably through the year. You'll see growth in 4Q to 1Q, 1Q to 2Q generally. You know, the percentage between quarters may jump around a bit, you know, just depending on the pace of activity and as we said, the first quarter will be a little bit higher in the highest part of the year in terms of capital which, you know, should see good first-half volumes, but then I fully expect to end the year at a pretty good clip. You know? We could start to see likely, frankly, maybe triple digits on overall volumes or certainly getting close to that. And then, you know, certainly in the year, maybe 40 thousand a day of oil if not a little bit better. I think these numbers are more or less in line with consensus, maybe a little bit better.

Thanks for that color. My follow-up, I just wanted to ask about Karnes. You mentioned a little more color on what you're testing at Karnes?

Yeah. There was an opportunity that we got involved in about a year or so ago through a small acquisition, about 25 thousand acres. I've mentioned it on previous calls, and again, I would describe it as an exploitation or appraisal option. It's an oily area, and if we can make it work, it could go together with some of the activity that we typically pursue in Karnes. We have had a couple of recent wells there that have performed quite good. But I do think we still need to study it a bit further before moving forward, so we'll just have to see how it goes. It's still a little early. But I'm encouraged by what we've seen so far.

Thanks, Chris. Thanks.

The next question comes from Noah Hungness with Bank of America. Please go ahead.

Good morning, guys. My first question, I was hoping to get your latest take on the M&A opportunity set across the Eagle Ford and where you see that greatest opportunity set as it in the oily window or the natural gas or somewhere in the middle?

Yeah. You know, look, over the last six to twelve months, there have been several opportunities and assets or packages that have popped up in the Eagle Ford mainly west of Karnes and of varying quality and size. You know, as we've said, oftentimes, we look at everything. We take a lot of tires, and we may or may not participate in some actual processes. But anyway, we look at a lot of things. And we'll just sort of see how it goes. There isn't anything that I would describe as massive or huge, but it certainly does have a bearing degree of quality. And, you know, we've always talked about on M&A, not looking to just add existing volumes, but looking to add opportunities where we have the chance to improve our resource set and upside over time. So you know, we carefully look at those things too. But they are generally familiar. Oh, sorry. Yeah. They have tended to be a bit oilier as you would imagine in the Lower Eagle Ford.

Yeah. It makes sense. And then for my second question, I was just wondering, your current CapEx guidance has a range for splitting it out by area for Karnes between 20% and 25% and Giddings between 80% and 75%. How should we think about what would cause it to go one way or the other?

I don't think it's I don't think you're gonna see, you know, any subtleties that you might have appreciated or looked through into the wording of the remarks is really around the noise. I mean, it, you know, for Giddings, as an example, last year, it represented 76% of our overall company volumes. You know, I think it's within a range, 75% to 80%. Same for Karnes. It might be slanted a little bit more around some appraisal work that we do, in one area versus the other, etcetera. Could be partially timing. But I wouldn't tell you that there's gonna be a sizable or significant shift one way or the other. I mean, we still like both assets for what they're capable of delivering and providing to the organization, to the company, I wouldn't expect a big change.

Sounds good. Thank you. Thanks.

Our next question comes from Neil Mehta with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.

Yes. Good morning, team. And I apologize if this question was asked already. But just your perspective on the big focus areas around Giddings and in the year ahead, what are some of the operational milestones that the market should be looking for in terms of continuing to assess how that project is developing?

Well, I hope to be able to talk about, you know, some further expansion of the field in terms of our, you know, appraisal work and some of the things in terms of further developing it, and delineating it. You know, as I said before, it all starts with well economics and we're just in such a much better position or a really, really strong position from our cost side of things. And so more comes into the fold with some of that. And it provides us with more flexibility and optionality to pursue some things or take a little bit more risk around appraisal work and test some areas. You know, test the boundaries, expand the boundaries of the field, if you will. So I hope to have more color and maybe provide some more actual feedback or data around our results, second half of this year. We're really just starting to get at it. So, you know, in terms of this year. So, hopefully, back half of the year, we'll have more to say.

Oh, that's great. Well, stay tuned. And then the follow-up is you got a really solid track record of dividend growth. I mean, you're targeting $0.60 here in 2025. Which is differentiated relative to a lot of SMIC Cap E&P. And so just your perspective on the sustainability of that dividend growth and your ability to continue to achieve 10% type of numbers? And how do you balance whether dividends or buybacks are the right use of that incremental dollar?

Well, on the dividend, the safety and security of the dividend is a critical element of it. I don't want to be one of those, you know, small, mid-cap, or any E&P company for that matter that sort of, you know, promises dividend growth, implements a growing dividend, then it sort of somehow vanishes in the mid of deteriorating. Portion of the cycle, so I don't want to be one of those companies that sort of has to fall back on that promise. So the dividend I'll use is a promise to the shareholders. And so we thoroughly stress test the dividend at much lower product prices when we go to the board for an increase every year, whenever that happens. And so I'm comfortable knowing that we'll be able to grow it. And remember, we talk about growing this dividend per share payout capacity. So the share repurchase program and the consistency of that sort of builds into that and works for you in terms of reducing the share count. So your cash dollars outlay doesn't increase as much as the percentage increase in the per share of the dividend. So it's sort of a natural benefit that plays hand in hand in that growth. And so I think it's, you know, on the share repurchases, the consistency of the program really is a good mix of ingredients if you will, around the recipe of our overall shareholder return program. And I feel confident that it's, you know, we've done the right thing by our shareholders and sort of dollar cost averaging per share repurchases, and it's improved everything on a per share metric over time. So the balance of how we're doing it, I think, is a reasonable approach.

Thanks, team. Appreciate it.

Thanks.

The next question comes from Geoff Jay with Daniel Energy Partners. Please go ahead.

Hey, guys. I just was looking for some clarification around the Giddings appraisal work. If, you know, this works out and you find what you're looking for, how significant is it for, you know, your location count down there? I mean, is it incremental, or is this sort of a really big deal?

Well, it's a really big deal in terms of what, you know, what the potential is. Because you got, you know, as I said, five hundred fifty thousand acres and, you know, we always look to add more opportunistically if and when we can, and that might even include, you know, some additional lease opportunities with time and some bolt-ons as we've done in the past. You know, look, it doesn't take much. You know, we continue to, as I said, press on the boundaries of the field and, you know, by adding, as I mentioned, incremental lateral feet to that drilling inventory. It doesn't take much to make a sizeable impact on our overall resource relative to our annual drilling program. So I think about it that way. But over time, and over multiple years, it can be quite sizable.

Excellent. Thank you.

Thanks.

This concludes our question and answer session. The conference is now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.